ACADEMIC JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING, VOL.18, ISSUE 3/2020 COMPARISON BETWEEN SINGLE- AND MULTI- DIMENSIONAL SITE SELECTION METHODS FOR REGIONAL AQUATIC PRODUCTS COLD CHAIN LOGISTICS CENTER Youli Wang1,2 1 School of Business Administration, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China 2 Applied Economics Postdoctoral Research Station of Jiangxi Publishing Group, Nanchang 330013, China E-mail:
[email protected] ABSTRACT: This paper innovatively employs the quantified Boston matrix to reassess the regional fishery competitiveness of Fujian, a southeastern province of China, using the indices and weights in the six-dimensional quantitative assessment of the sites for APs cold chain logistics center. In light of the assessment results, the quantified Boston matrix under multiple dimensions were compared with the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) under a single dimension. The comparison shows that the single-dimensional method achieved basically the same results with the multi-dimensional method, with some differences arising from government strategies. The multi-dimensional method can depict the competition between APs cold chain logistics centers more scientifically, intuitively, comprehensively and accurately than the single-dimensional method. KEYWORDS: AP cold chain logistics center; technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS); quantified the Boston matrix; dimension. Among them, the analytic hierarchy process, the 1 INTRODUCTION multi-objective programming approach and the grey Since the Central Document No. 1, issued in correlation analysis are commonly used (Akbulut et 2004, put up the concern of fresh product logistics, al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2019; Omrani et al., 2018; this is the 10th times that relevant industries were Birgün and Güngör, 2014; Li et al., 2018; Li eta l., mentioned in No.