Alive and Thrive Ethiopia Baseline Report 2011.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alive and Thrive Ethiopia Baseline Report 2011.Pdf Alive & Thrive is a six-year (2009-2014) initiative to improve infant and young child feeding practices by increasing rates of exclusive breastfeeding and improving complementary feeding practices. The first two years provide a window of opportunity to prevent child deaths and ensure healthy growth and brain development. Alive & Thrive (A&T) aims to reach more than 16 million children under two years old in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Viet Nam through various delivery models. Learning will be shared widely to inform policies and programs throughout the world. Alive & Thrive is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and managed by FHI 360. Other members of the A&T consortium include BRAC, GMMB, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Save the Children, University of California-Davis, and World Vision. Suggested citation: Ali D, Tedla M, Subandoro A, Bamezai A, Rawat R, Menon P. Alive & Thrive Baseline Survey Report: Ethiopia. Washington, D.C.: Alive & Thrive, 2011. Alive & Thrive FHI 360 1825 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite S680 Washington, DC 20009-5721 Tel: (202) 884-8000 Fax: (202) 464-3966 [email protected] www.aliveandthrive.org Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................ vi List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................. viii List of Annex Tables ..................................................................................................................................... ix List of Annex Figures ..................................................................................................................................... x Acronyms .................................................................................................................................................... xii Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... xiv 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Brief Overview of the Nutrition Situation in Ethiopia ........................................................................ 1 1.2 Description of Alive & Thrive Program in Ethiopia ............................................................................ 1 1.3 Objectives of the Impact Evaluation .................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Structure of the Report ...................................................................................................................... 4 2. Methods ................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Conceptual Framework ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Evaluation Design ............................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Description of evaluation design ................................................................................................ 6 2.2.2 Sample size .................................................................................................................................. 8 2.2.3 Sampling and selection of eligible households ........................................................................... 8 2.3 Data Collection Methods ................................................................................................................. 10 2.3.1 Design and content of survey questionnaires .......................................................................... 10 2.4 Training of Personnel ....................................................................................................................... 13 2.4.1 Training of interviewers ............................................................................................................ 13 2.4.2 Training and standardization in anthropometric measurements ............................................. 15 2.5 Fieldwork Logistics ........................................................................................................................... 16 2.5.1 Composition of survey team ..................................................................................................... 16 2.5.2 Administration of the household survey and anthropometric measurements ........................ 16 2.5.3 Administration of the community and health staff questionnaires ......................................... 17 2.5.4 Supervision and quality control ................................................................................................ 17 2.5.5 Fieldwork constraints ................................................................................................................ 17 2.5.6 Data management ..................................................................................................................... 18 2.5.7 Data analysis ............................................................................................................................. 18 2.5.8 Limitation of the survey ............................................................................................................ 18 3. Results: Sample Characteristics ............................................................................................................. 20 3.1 Variables ........................................................................................................................................... 20 3.2 Results of Sample Characteristics .................................................................................................... 20 iii 4. Results: Key Impact Indicators ............................................................................................................... 23 4.1 Variables ........................................................................................................................................... 23 4.2 Results: Core A&T Impact Indicators ............................................................................................... 23 4.3 Results: Anthropometric Outcomes................................................................................................. 24 4.3.1 Mean anthropometric indices ................................................................................................... 24 4.3.2 Stunting, underweight, and wasting ......................................................................................... 29 4.4 Results: IYCF Indicators .................................................................................................................... 32 4.4.1 Overall patterns of IYCF ............................................................................................................ 32 4.4.2 Breastfeeding-related practices ................................................................................................ 34 4.4.3 Complementary feeding-related practices ............................................................................... 36 4.5 Chapter Summary ............................................................................................................................ 38 5. Results: IYCF Practices, Challenges, and Child Feeding Knowledge ....................................................... 40 5.1 Variables ........................................................................................................................................... 40 5.2 Breastfeeding Challenges ................................................................................................................. 41 5.3 Complementary Practices and Challenges ....................................................................................... 42 5.4 Knowledge about IYCF Practices ...................................................................................................... 45 5.5 Awareness, Trial, and Adoption of Key IYCF Practices ..................................................................... 50 5.6 Chapter Summary ............................................................................................................................ 51 6. Results: Use of A&T Platform ................................................................................................................. 52 6.1 Variables ........................................................................................................................................... 52 6.2 Community/Health System Platform ............................................................................................... 52 6.3 Exposure to Media ........................................................................................................................... 57 6.4 Access and Use of Markets .............................................................................................................. 59 6.5 Chapter Summary ............................................................................................................................ 60 7. Results: Child, Caregiver, and Household Characteristics That Influence
Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Sidama Indigenous Institutions in Conflict Resolution: in the Case of Dalle Woreda, Southern Ethiopia
    American Journal of Sociological Research 2016, 6(1): 10-26 DOI: 10.5923/j.sociology.20160601.02 The Role of Sidama Indigenous Institutions in Conflict Resolution: In the Case of Dalle Woreda, Southern Ethiopia Abebe Demewoz Mengesha Anthropology, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia Abstract The major goal of this study was to assess the role of indigenous institutions in handling/ settling conflicts in the Sidama Society. Sidama Communities are found in Sidama Zone, Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples Regional State (SNNPRS). The research was conducted in Dalle woreda, Sidama Zone and it was purposively selected. Qualitative research methodology was employed in the study for its appropriateness to assess the role of indigenous institutions in handling/ settling conflicts in the study area and data was collected through the use of interview, key informant interview, focus group discussion, personal observation and document review. The results obtained from the study suggest that Conflicts in Sidama, as in anywhere else, may vary from trivial interpersonal disagreements to a serious dispute which might eventually lead to homicide. The most common conflict issues in Sidama are grazing land, water, farmland and borderland. There are many deeds and accounts in the daily activities of the society which are considered to be crimes with regard to the norms and traditions of the Sidama community. However, the most serious ones are: beating a man with a slump and/or thin stick, Beating elderly, raping, murder, Physical damage, Adultery. Sidama indigenous institutions have played a great role to solve different local conflicts and for the development of modern institutions. The modern institutions (Courts) have and took a strong base from the indigenous institutions in resolving conflict and preserving peace and security.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Length Research Article DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH
    Available online at http://www.journalijdr.com International Journal of DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH ISSN: 2230-9926 International Journal of Development Research Vol. 07, Issue, 01, pp.11119-11130, January, 2017 Full Length Research Article DETERMINANTS OF RURAL HOUSEHOLDS’ VULNERABILITY TO POVERTY IN CHENCHA AND ABAYA DISTRICTS, SOUTHERN ETHIOPIA *Fassil Eshetu Abebe Department of Economics, College of Business and Economics, Arba Minch University ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article History: This study primarily aimed to examine the determinants of rural households’ vulnerability to Received 27th October, 2016 poverty and to profile the households according to their level of vulnerability using Feasible Received in revised form Generalized Least Square (FGLS) and Logistic Regression analysis with the help of data collected 28th November, 2016 from a sample of 500 households in two Woredas. The general poverty line of the study area was Accepted 14th December, 2016 determined to be Birr 248 per month per adult equivalent and 29.8 percent of the population in the th Published online 30 January, 2017 study areas were found to be poor. The projected consumption percapita after the three step FGLS estimation revealed that, the incidence of vulnerability to poverty in the area was 34.2 percent and Key Words: therefore, vulnerability was more spread in the study areas than ex post poverty. Using the two Poverty, Vulnerability, vulnerability thresholds, observed poverty rate (0.298) and vulnerability of 0.5, about 28.6%, Feasible Generalized Least Square, 5.6% and 65.8% of households were highly vulnerable, low vulnerable and not vulnerable Logit Model and Ethiopia. respectively. Most importantly, from the total poor households about 81.75%, 3.25% and 15% were highly vulnerable, low vulnerable and not vulnerable respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Patterns and Its Implication for Climate Change: the Case of Gamo Gofa, Southern Ethiopia
    Defaru Debebe. et al., IJSRR 2013, 2(3), 155-173 Research article Available online www.ijsrr.org ISSN: 2279–0543 International Journal of Scientific Research and Reviews Land Use Patterns and its Implication for Climate Change: The Case of Gamo Gofa, Southern Ethiopia Defaru Debebe* and Tuma Ayele Arba Minch University P.O.Box 21, Arba Minch, Ethiopia ABSTRACT Land is one of three major factors of production in classical economics (along with labor and capital) and an essential input for housing and crop production. Land use is the backbone of agriculture and it provides substantial economic and social benefits. Assessing past-to present land use patterns associated with the crop production helps to understand which climatic effects might arise due to expanding crop cultivation. This study was conducted to evaluate the land use pattern and its implication for climate change in Gamo Gofa, Southern Ethiopia. For evaluation, correlation and time series trend analysis were used. Results revealed that a significant reduction in cultivable land, which was converted into cropland and might increase deforestation and greenhouse gas emission, in turn induce climate change. The correlation between cropland and fertile (cultivable) land (r=0.22674) in 2005 improved to (r=0.75734) in 2012 indicating major shift of fertile land to cropland in seven years interval. On other side, twelve years (1987-1999 and 2000-2011) average maximum temperature difference in Gamo Gafa was increased 0.425oC with standard deviation 0.331. It is statistically significant (t =1.284, alpha=0.10) at 10% level of error. Moreover, the spatial differences in climate change are likely to imply a heterogeneous pattern of land use responses.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Worm Infestation in SNNP and Oromia Regions As of 24 May
    Army worm infestation in SNNP and Oromia Regions As of 24 May, some 8,368 hectares of belg cropland was reportedly destroyed by army worms in Wolayita zone of SNNPR - an area that suffered from late onset of the 2013 belg rains and subsequent heavy rains that damaged belg crops. The damage caused by the army worms will further reduce the expected harvest this season. Similar incidents were also reported from Boricha, Bona Zuria, Dara, Dale, Hawassa Zuria and Loko Abaya woredas of Sidama zone; Loma and Mareka woredas of Dawro zone (SNNPR), as well as from drought prone areas of East and West Hararge zones of Oromia Region; and quickly spreading to neighbouring areas. In Boricha woreda, for example, more than 655 hectares of belg cropland was destroyed in the course of one week, this is indicative of the speed that damage is being caused. Immediate distribution of spraying containers and chemicals to the farmers is required to prevent further loss of belg crops. For more information, contact: [email protected] Health Update The number of meningitis cases has gradually declined since the outbreak was declared in January. To date, 1,371 cases were reported from 24 woredas in five zones of SNNP and Oromia Regions. The Government, with support from health partners, is conducting a reactive vaccination in the affected areas, with 1, 678,220 people vaccinated so far. Next week, the number of people vaccinated during the Addis Ababa City Administration meningitis vaccination campaign, conducted from 20 to 26 May, will be released. Meanwhile, the number of kebeles reporting cases of Yellow Fever in South Ari, Benatsemay and Selmago woredas of South Omo zone, SNNPR, increased.
    [Show full text]
  • New Intestinal Schistosomiasis Transmission Foci and Soil
    New Intestinal Schistosomiasis Transmission Foci and Soil-transmitted Helminths Infection After Five Years of Preventive Chemotherapy and Associated Risk Factors Among School-aged Children in Two Districts in Southern Ethiopia Zerihun Zerdo ( [email protected] ) Arba Minch University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6509-4672 Hilde Bastiaens University of Antwerp Drie Eiken Campus: Universiteit Antwerpen Campus Drie Eiken Sibyl Anthierens University of Antwerp Drie Eiken Campus: Universiteit Antwerpen Campus Drie Eiken Fekadu Massebo Arba Minch University Matewos Masne Arba Minch University Gelila Biresaw Arba Minch University Misgun Shewangizaw Arba Minch University Abayneh Tunje Arba Minch University Yilma Chisha Arba Minch University Tsegaye Yohannes Arba Minch University Jean-Pierre Van geertruyden University of Antwerp Drie Eiken Campus: Universiteit Antwerpen Campus Drie Eiken Research Article Keywords: new foci, Intestinal Schistosomiasis, Soil-Transmitted Helmenthiasis, factors, SAC, Southern Ethiopia Page 1/27 Posted Date: December 3rd, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-118298/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 2/27 Abstract Background: Preventive chemotherapy (PC), is the main elimination strategy against Soil-Tansmitted Helmenthiasis (STH) and Schistosomiasis (SCH) recommended by the world health organization (WHO), should be strengthened through identication of the remaining SCH transmission foci and evaluating its impact to get lesson. This study was aimed to assess the prevalence of STH/SCH infections, intensity of infections and associated factors among School Age Children (SAC) in two districts, previously not known to be endemic for SCH in Southern Ethiopia, October to December 2019. Methods: Structured interview questionnaire was used to collect data, the record of treatment coverage against STH was reviewed and stool samples collected from 2114 children were diagnosed using Kato- Katz technique.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article Impact of Community-Led Total Sanitation and Hygiene
    Hindawi Advances in Public Health Volume 2020, Article ID 8237101, 12 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8237101 Research Article Impact of Community-Led Total Sanitation and Hygiene on Prevalence of Diarrheal Disease and Associated Factors among Under-Five Children: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study in Selected Woredas of Gamo Gofa Zone, Southern Ethiopia Agune Ashole Alto , Wanzahun Godana , and Genet Gedamu Department of Public Health, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia Correspondence should be addressed to Agune Ashole Alto; [email protected] Received 1 May 2019; Revised 10 December 2019; Accepted 31 January 2020; Published 24 February 2020 Academic Editor: Carol J. Burns Copyright © 2020 Agune Ashole Alto et al. 'is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Background. Diarrheal diseases are still one of the major causes of morbidity in under-five children in sub-Saharan Africa. In Ethiopia, diarrhea is responsible for 9% of all deaths and is the major cause of under-five mortality. Objective. To assess the impact of community-led total sanitation and hygiene on the prevalence of diarrheal disease and factors associated among under-five children in Gamo Gofa Zone. Methods. Community-based comparative cross-sectional study design was used to compare the impact of community-led total sanitation and hygiene intervention on under-five diarrheal disease. Multistage sampling method was employed. 'e data were collected by using pretested structured questionnaires. Data quality was ensured by daily supervision completeness and consistency.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Seroprevalence and Associated Risk Factors Of
    ary Scien in ce r te & e T V e Malicha, et al., J Vet Sci Technol 2017, 8:5 f c h o Journal of Veterinary Science & n n l o o a a DOI: 10.4172/2157-7579.1000471 l l n n o o r r g g u u y y o o J J Technology ISSN: 2157-7579 Research Article Open Access Study of Seroprevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia in Sidama Zone, Southern Ethiopia Gelgelo Malicha1, Sisay Alemu1*, Fasil Aklilu2 and Ashebr Abraha1 1College of Veterinary Medicine, Haramaya University, P.O. Box 138, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia 2National Animal Health Diagnostic & Investigation Center (NAHDIC), P.O. Box 04, Sebeta, Ethiopia *Corresponding author: Sisay Alemu, Haramaya University College of Veterinary Medicine, P.O. Box 138, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia, Tel: +251-25-5530334; E-mail: [email protected] Rec date: May 31, 2017; Acc date: September 18, 2017; Pub date: September 19, 2017 Copyright: © 2017 Malicha G, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia (CBPP), a disease contributes significantly to cattle morbidity and mortality, remains the most important infectious disease of cattle in Ethiopia. Hence, a cross-sectional study was carried out in nine districts of Sidama Zone, to estimate animal level seroprevalence of CBPP in cattle, and to assess risk factors associated with its occurrence using competitive enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (c-ELISA).
    [Show full text]
  • Explanatory Notes
    GEOLOGICAL HAZARDS AND ENGINEERING GEOLOGY MAPS OF DILA NB 37-6 EXPLANATORY NOTES Habtamu Eshetu (Chief Compiler) Vladislav Rapprich (Editor) The Main Project Partners The Czech Development Agency (CzDA) cooperates with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on the establishment of an institutional framework of Czech development cooperation and actively participates in the creation and financing of development cooperation programs between the Czech Republic and partner countries. www.czda.cz The Geological Survey of Ethiopia (GSE) is accountable to the Ministry of Mines and Energy, collects and assesses geology, geological engineering and hydrogeology data for publication. The project beneficiary. www.gse.gov.et The Czech Geological Survey collects data and information on geology and processes it for political, economical and environmental management. The main contractor. www.geology.cz AQUATEST a.s. is a Czech consulting and engineering company in water management and environmental protection. The main aquatest subcontractor. www.aquatest.cz Copyright © 2014 Czech Geological Survey, Klarov 3, 118 21 Prague 1, Czech Republic First edition AcknowledgmentAcknowledgment Fieldwork and primary compilation of the map and explanatory notes was done by a team from the Geological Survey of Ethiopia (GSE) consisting of staff from the Geo Hazard Investigation Directorate, Groundwater Resources Assessment Directorate and Czech experts from AQUATEST a.s. and the Czech Geological Survey in the framework of the Czech Development Cooperation Program. We would like to thank the SNNPR Regional Water Bureau, the Dila, Sidamo and Sodo- Woleita Zone Administrations, Water, Mines and Energy offices for their hospitality, guidance and relevant data delivery. The team is grateful to the management of the Geological Survey of Ethiopia, particularly to Director General (GSE) Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Partners for Water Supply and Sanitation (Pfws) and Wateraid
    Partners for Water and Sanitation Note on project reports The following report has been prepared by Partners for Water and Sanitation in response to a project Terms of Reference. The content of the report is based on the opinion of the author(s) and does not necessarily represent the opinions of the wider PfWS partnership, or the project funders. Any extracts from the report should only be used with prior permission of the report author(s). Partners for Water and Sanitation, July 2010 Partners for Water and Sanitation Joint Capacity Building Support to the Gamo Gofa Zone, Konso and Derashe Special Woreda Water Resources Development Office (WRDO), Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples Region (SNNPR), Ethiopia, on Rehabilitation of Water Supply Schemes. Partners for Water and Sanitation (PfWS) and WaterAid Ethiopia (WAE) Report Submitted by: Paul Stanfield (Wessex Water Services Ltd) Mike Fray (Information and Performance Services Ltd) Melkamu Jelata (Partners for Water and Sanitation) February 2010 Contents amendment record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Revision Description Date Signed 1 Draft for PfWS and February Paul WaterAid Ethiopia 2010 Stanfield Comment 2 Draft Final 25th Feb Paul 2010 Stanfield Joint Capacity Building Support to the Gamo Gofa Zone, Konso and Derashe Special Woreda Water Resources Development Office (WRDO), Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples Region (SNNPR), Ethiopia, on Rehabilitation of Water Supply Schemes. 1. Introduction In January 2010, Partners for Water Supply and Sanitation (PfWS) and WaterAid Ethiopia (WAE) conducted a joint capacity building training, workshop and needs assessment event with the Water Resources Development Office (WRDO) in Arba Minch, Gamo Gofa Zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopian Coffee Buying Guide
    Fintrac Inc. www.fintrac.com [email protected] US Virgin Islands 3077 Kronprindsens Gade 72 St. Thomas, USVI 00802 Tel: (340) 776-7600 Fax: (340) 776-7601 Washington, D.C. 1436 U Street NW, Suite 303 Washington, D.C. 20009 USA Tel: (202) 462-8475 Fax: (202) 462-8478 USAID’s Agribusiness and Trade Expansion Program 4th Floor, Ki-Ab Building Alexander Pushkin Street Kebele 23 Addis Ababa Ethiopia Tel: + 251-(0)11-372-0060/61/62/63/64 Fax: + 251-(0)11-372-0102 () parenthesis indicate use within Ethiopia only Author Willem J. Boot Photography All photos by Willem J. Boot March 2011 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Willem J. Boot for Fintrac Inc., the U.S. contractor implementing USAID/Ethiopia’s Agribusiness and Trade Expansion Program. March 2011 The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENT INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 PART ONE: THE MOTHERLAND OF COFFEE ...................................................................... 2 Culture and Geography ................................................................................................ 2 Coffee Characteristics ................................................................................................. 3 Processing: Sun-dried Natural Coffees vs. Washed Coffees
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated to Skin Diseases in Small Ruminants in Gamo Gofa Zone, South-Western Ethiopia
    Vol. 9(8), pp. 228-234, August 2017 DOI: 10.5897/JVMAH2015.0375 Article Number: E9251B465489 Journal of Veterinary Medicine and ISSN 2141-2529 Copyright © 2017 Animal Health Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/JVMAH Full Length Research Paper Prevalence and risk factors associated to skin diseases in small ruminants in Gamo Gofa zone, south-Western Ethiopia Bereket Molla1*, Haba Haile2,3 and Sefinew Alemu2 1The Donkey Sanctuary Working Worldwide, Ethiopia Program, Ethiopia. 2 University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. 3 Gofa Universal College, Department of Animal Health, Sawla, Ethiopia. Received 25 February 2015; Accepted 27 May 2015 A cross-sectional study was employed to estimate the prevalence of skin diseases in small ruminant and risk factors associated to its occurrence in Gamo Gofa zone from July, 2012 to April, 2014. The study areas were clustered into two agro-ecological zones; lowland and highland area. A total of nine hundred (450 sheep and 450 goats) were examined. Detailed physical examinations and systemic examinations, followed by skin scraping and laboratory tests were carried out to diagnose skin diseases. The Pearson’s chi-square (χ2) test was used to assess the degree of association between skin diseases and risk factors. The overall prevalence was found to be 42.33% (381/900). Significantly higher prevalence (p<0.05) of small ruminant skin disease was observed in goats (52.22%) than sheep (38.66%). Furthermore, the study also revealed significantly higher prevalence (p<0.05) in unvaccinated (42.92%) than vaccinated (29.52%) group of animals. The occurrence of skin diseases was statistically significantly associated with age and sex of animals.
    [Show full text]