Bayeux Tapestry: Some Key Scenes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Odo, Bishop of Bayeux and Earl of Kent
( 55 ) ODO, BISHOP OF BAYEUX AND EARL OF KENT. BY SER REGINALD TOWER, K.C.M.G., C.Y.O. IN the volumes of Archceologia Cantiana there occur numerous references to Bishop Odo, half-brother of William the Conqueror ; and his name finds frequent mention in Hasted's History of Kent, chiefly in connection with the lands he possessed. Further, throughout the records of the early Norman chroniclers, the Bishop of Bayeux is constantly cited among the outstanding figures in the reigns of William the Conqueror and of his successor William Rufus, as well as in the Duchy of Normandy. It seems therefore strange that there should be (as I am given to understand) no Life of the Bishop beyond the article in the Dictionary of National Biography. In the following notes I have attempted to collate available data from contemporary writers, aided by later historians of the period during, and subsequent to, the Norman Conquest. Odo of Bayeux was the son of Herluin of Conteville and Herleva (Arlette), daughter of Eulbert the tanner of Falaise. Herleva had .previously given birth to William the Conqueror by Duke Robert of Normandy. Odo's younger brother was Robert, Earl of Morton (Mortain). Odo was born about 1036, and brought up at the Court of Normandy. In early youth, about 1049, when he was attending the Council of Rheims, his half-brother, William, bestowed on him the Bishopric of Bayeux. He was present, in 1066, at the Conference summoned at Lillebonne, by Duke William after receipt of the news of Harold's succession to the throne of England. -
Anglo- Saxon England and the Norman Conquest, 1060-1066
1.1 Anglo- Saxon society Key topic 1: Anglo- Saxon England and 1.2 The last years of Edward the Confessor and the succession crisis the Norman Conquest, 1060-1066 1.3 The rival claimants for the throne 1.4 The Norman invasion The first key topic is focused on the final years of Anglo-Saxon England, covering its political, social and economic make-up, as well as the dramatic events of 1066. While the popular view is often of a barbarous Dark-Ages kingdom, students should recognise that in reality Anglo-Saxon England was prosperous and well governed. They should understand that society was characterised by a hierarchical system of government and they should appreciate the influence of the Church. They should also be aware that while Edward the Confessor was pious and respected, real power in the 1060s lay with the Godwin family and in particular Earl Harold of Wessex. Students should understand events leading up to the death of Edward the Confessor in 1066: Harold Godwinson’s succession as Earl of Wessex on his father’s death in 1053 inheriting the richest earldom in England; his embassy to Normandy and the claims of disputed Norman sources that he pledged allegiance to Duke William; his exiling of his brother Tostig, removing a rival to the throne. Harold’s powerful rival claimants – William of Normandy, Harald Hardrada and Edgar – and their motives should also be covered. Students should understand the range of causes of Harold’s eventual defeat, including the superior generalship of his opponent, Duke William of Normandy, the respective quality of the two armies and Harold’s own mistakes. -
Anglo–Saxon and Norman England
GCSE HISTORY Anglo–Saxon and Norman England Module booklet. Your Name: Teacher: Target: History Module Booklet – U2B- Anglo-Saxon & Norman England, 1060-88 Checklist Anglo-Saxon society and the Norman conquest, 1060-66 Completed Introduction to William of Normandy 2-3 Anglo-Saxon society 4-5 Legal system and punishment 6-7 The economy and social system 8 House of Godwin 9-10 Rivalry for the throne 11-12 Battle of Gate Fulford & Stamford Bridge 13 Battle of Hastings 14-16 End of Key Topic 1 Test 17 William I in power: Securing the kingdom, 1066-87 Page Submission of the Earls 18 Castles and the Marcher Earldoms 19-20 Revolt of Edwin and Morcar, 1068 21 Edgar Aethling’s revolts, 1069 22-24 The Harrying of the North, 1069-70 25 Hereward the Wake’s rebellion, 1070-71 26 Maintaining royal power 27-28 The revolt of the Earls, 1075 29-30 End of Key Topic 2 Test 31 Norman England, 1066-88 Page The Norman feudal system 32 Normans and the Church 33-34 Everyday life - society and the economy 35 Norman government and legal system 36-38 Norman aristocracy 39 Significance of Odo, Bishop of Bayeux 40 William I and his family 41-42 William, Robert and revolt in Normandy, 1077-80 43 Death, disputes and revolts, 1087-88 44 End of Key Topic 3 test 45 1 History Module Booklet – U2B- Anglo-Saxon & Norman England, 1060-88 2 History Module Booklet – U2B- Anglo-Saxon & Norman England, 1060-88 KT1 – Anglo-Saxon society and the Normans, 1060-66 Introduction On the evening of 14 October 1066 William of Normandy stood on the battlefield of Hastings. -
Hie Est Wadard: Vassal of Odo of Bayeux Or Miles and Frater of St Augustine's, Canterbury?'
Reading Medieval Studies XL (20 14) Hie est Wadard: Vassal of Odo of Bayeux or Miles and Frater of St Augustine's, Canterbury?' Stephen D. White Emory University On the Bayeux Embroidery, the miles identified as Wadard by the accompanying inscription (W 46: Hie est Wadarcf) has long been known as a 'vassal' of William l's uterine brother, Odo of Bayeux (or de Conteville), who was Bishop of Bayeux from 104911050 until his death in 1097; earl of Kent from e. 1067 until hi s exile in 1088; and prior to his imprisonment in 1082, the greatest and most powerful landholder after the king.' Wadard appears just after Duke William's invading army has landed at Pevensey (W 43) and four of his milites have hurried to Hastings to seize food (W 44-5: Et hie milites festinaverunt hestinga lit eibum raperentur).' On horseback, clad in a hauberk and armed with a shield and spear, Wadard supervises as animals are brought to be slaughtered by an axe-wielding figure (W 45) and then cooked (W 46). Writing in 1821, Charles Stoddard was unable to identify Wadard, because written accounts of the conquest never mention him .4 Nevertheless, he cited his image, along with those of two other men called Turold (W 11) and Vital (W 55), as evidence that the hanging must have dated from 'the time of the Conquest', when its designer and audience could still have known of men as obscure as Wadard and the other two obviously were.' In 1833, Wadard was first identified authoritatively as Odo's 'sub-tenant' by Henry Ellis in A General introduction to Domesday Book, though as far back as 1821 Thomas Amyot had I am deeply indebted to Kate Gilbert fo r her work in researching and editing this article and to Elizabeth Carson Pastan for her helpful suggestions and criticisms. -
Norman Consolidation of Power Level
Key Words, Week 1: Key Individuals, Week 2: History, Y9 T1b: Norman Consolidation of Power Revolt A rebellion against the ruler of a country William the Norman king of England, ruled from 1066 (those rebelling are known as rebels). Conqueror to 1087. Level: Grade 5 (compulsory) Regent A trusted advisor to the king that was allowed Edwin and Morcar Anglo-Saxon earls of Mercia and to run the country while he was absent. Northumbria. Submitted in 1066, but later Key dates, Week 3: th Motte and A castle which was easy to build, used by the rebelled multiple times. 25 Dec William crowned king at Westminster bailey Normans to control England soon after the Edgar Atheling An Anglo-Saxon claimant to the throne. 1066 Abbey. Conquest. Allied with the Scots and the Danes to Aug A major rebellion in the north, led by Landholder The person that lives on the land, effectively fight William. 1068 Edwin and Morcar. renting it from the king. Robert de A Norman earl, given the job of subduing Jan 1069 Robert de Comines was burned to death Landowner The person who actually owns the land. After Comines Northumbria. Burned to death by rebels. by rebels in Durham. 1066, the king was the only landowner in Hereward the An Anglo-Saxon thegn and rebel who took Sept The Danes invaded and supported the England. Wake Ely. 1069 Anglo-Saxon rebellion, led by Edgar. Tenure The process by which you held land from the William fitzOsbern Loyal followers of William and his regents Oct 1069 William paid off the Danes and defeated king. -
The Bayeux Tapestry and the Vikings
Peregrinations: Journal of Medieval Art and Architecture Volume 2 Issue 4 9-50 2009 The Bayeux Tapestry and the Vikings Shirley Ann Brown York University Follow this and additional works at: https://digital.kenyon.edu/perejournal Part of the Ancient, Medieval, Renaissance and Baroque Art and Architecture Commons Recommended Citation Brown, Shirley Ann. "The Bayeux Tapestry and the Vikings." Peregrinations: Journal of Medieval Art and Architecture 2, 4 (2009): 9-50. https://digital.kenyon.edu/perejournal/vol2/iss4/3 This Feature Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Art History at Digital Kenyon: Research, Scholarship, and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Peregrinations: Journal of Medieval Art and Architecture by an authorized editor of Digital Kenyon: Research, Scholarship, and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Brown 1 The Bayeux Tapestry and the Vikings By Shirley Ann Brown, York University, Toronto In 1958, Hollywood produced The Vikings, a blockbuster featuring first-rank stars like Kirk Douglas, Tony Curtis, Janet Leigh, and Ernest Borgnine. The director, Richard Fleischer, wanted the utmost authenticity, so he filmed the action in the fjords of Norway. One of the intriguing aspects of the film’s visuals was the rolling credits at the beginning and end of the movie for which the Bayeux Tapestry served as the basis. Figure 1: Opening credits from The Vikings, Metro Goldwyn Mayer, 1958. 1 This article is an expansion of a paper originally read in French for the colloquium “La Tapisserie de Bayeux: une chronique des temps vikings?” held 29-30 March 2007 in Bayeux, organized by Sylvette Lemagnen, Conservateur of the Bayeux Tapestry. -
Anglo-Saxon and Norman England, C.1060-1088 Paper 2 British Depth Study
Paper 2 – Anglo-Saxon and Norman England, c.1060-1088 Paper 2 British Depth Study: Anglo-Saxon and Norman England c.1060-88 Name ………………………………………………….. 1 Paper 2 – Anglo-Saxon and Norman England, c.1060-1088 Anglo-Saxon and Norman England – Revision Checklist How well do I know each topic? 3 Anglo-Saxon England and the Norman Conquest 4 What was England like in Anglo-Saxon times? 8 Edward the Confessor’s last years 11 1066 and the rival claimants for the throne 13 The Norman invasion 15 Topic Test – Theme 1: Anglo-Saxon England and the Norman Conquest 16 William I in Power: Securing the Kingdom, 1066-87 17 Establishing control 20 Anglo-Saxon resistance, 1068-71 22 The legacy of resistance to 1087 25 Revolt of the Earls, 1075 27 Topic Test – Theme 2: Securing the Kingdom, 1066-87 29 Norman England, 1066-88 30 The feudal system 32 The Church 35 Norman government 37 Norman aristocracy 39 William I and his sons 41 Topic Test – Theme 3: Norman England, 1066-88 Produced by J. Harris, Sir Harry Smith Community College 2 Paper 2 – Anglo-Saxon and Norman England, c.1060-1088 Theme 1: Anglo-Saxon England and the Norman Conquest, 1060-66 3 Paper 2 – Anglo-Saxon and Norman England, c.1060-1088 What was England like in Anglo-Saxon times? England had a population of about 2 million people (less than half of London today!) Almost everyone farmed land. England was a Christian country, and religion played a large role in everyday life. For centuries England had been under threat from the Vikings, and parts of northern England had Viking settlers. -
The Geographic Origins of the Norman Conquerors of England
The Geographic Origins of the Norman Conquerors of England Christopher Macdonald Hewitt escended from Vikings, the Norman armies of the eleventh and twelfth centuries spread out from their home in Northern France on a quest to conquer and explore new lands beyond their duchy.1 The Dmost famous of these quests was the Norman Conquest of England in 1066. After many months of planning and preparation, this quest climaxed on Saturday, October 14, 1066 at the Battle of Hastings. Here, the Normans crushed the Anglo-Saxon rulers of England with the power and might of their knights. While much has been written about this epic battle, few studies have focused squarely on the importance of some of the more fundamental char- acteristics of the primary combatants themselves—the Norman knights. In an attempt to partially address this deficiency, this study focuses on one particular aspect of this armed cohort: its geographic origins. Following a discussion of Duke William’s leadership role and the Norman Army’s or- ganization at Hastings, the study moves to focus squarely on the as yet un- examined geographical allegiances of the Norman knights and how this might shed light on both the motivation of the combatants and their ulti- mate success in mobilizing the resources required to win at Hastings. Literature review There is no shortage of scholarly work chronicling key aspects of the Battle of Hastings. Temporally, these accounts range from the time of the battle itself until the modern era. One of the oldest and best-known sources is the Bayeux Tapestry. This account depicts the Conquest graphically from the Norman perspective,2 in the form of pictures or diagrams.3 It is be- lieved to have been funded by Bishop Odo of Bayeux, Duke William’s half brother. -
The Bayeux Tapestry As a Medieval Educational Tool
OUR Journal: ODU Undergraduate Research Journal Volume 6 Article 1 2019 It’s Elementary: The Bayeux Tapestry as a Medieval Educational Tool Sarah Bulger Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/ourj Part of the Ancient, Medieval, Renaissance and Baroque Art and Architecture Commons, and the Medieval Studies Commons Recommended Citation Bulger, Sarah (2019) "It’s Elementary: The Bayeux Tapestry as a Medieval Educational Tool," OUR Journal: ODU Undergraduate Research Journal: Vol. 6 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/ourj/vol6/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in OUR Journal: ODU Undergraduate Research Journal by an authorized editor of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. It’s Elementary: The Bayeux Tapestry as a Medieval Educational Tool Cover Page Footnote Thesis Advisor: Dr. Anne H. Muraoka This article is available in OUR Journal: ODU Undergraduate Research Journal: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/ourj/ vol6/iss1/1 Bulger: The Bayeux Tapestry as a Medieval Educational Tool IT’S ELEMENTARY: THE BAYEUX TAPESTRY AS A MEDIEVAL EDUCATIONAL TOOL By Sarah Bulger Published by ODU Digital Commons, 2019 1 OUR Journal: ODU Undergraduate Research Journal, Vol. 6 [2019], Art. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ……………………………………………………………………… ii Introduction ……………………………………………………………………….... 1 State of Scholarship ……………………………………………………………....... 2 The -
Shirley Ann Brown
Shirley Ann Brown The Bayeux Tapestry and the Song of Roland RITING AROUND 1067, Guy of Amiens described in his Carmen de W Hastingae Proelio how a certain "mimus" rode before the assem- bled French troops at Hastings and juggled with his sword. The purpose of this bravado performance was to hearten the French and terrify the English. An infuriated English knight rode forward to rid the field of this arrogant intruder, but he was swept from his horse by the lance of "Incisor-ferri" and, losing his head, became instead the first trophy of the battle.1 Some sixty years later the incident had assumed a different dimension when William of Malmesbury indicated that the story of Roland was sung before the French at Hastings to serve as an example of valour to those who were about to face a fight that could end only in victory or death.2 It is not surprising that Wace, writing between 1160 and 1174, combined the two stories, and that the juggling knight "Taillefer" was said to have had the Song of Roland on his lips as he faced the army. All that this proves, of course, is that the story of Roland's valor and death at Roncevaux was a popular model of military heroism during the twelfth century. It is difficult to imagine how the poem, as we have it, could have been performed while two armies were poised and ready to attack each other. Nevertheless, the Song of Roland has been associated with the Normans and Hastings by many subsequent historians. -
What Caused Edwin (Mercia) and Morcar (Northumbria) to Revolt in 1068? Reasons Key
What caused Edwin (Mercia) and Morcar (Northumbria) to revolt in 1068? Reasons key: • LAND = L • PERSONAL = P • UNFAIR LEADERSHIP BY WILLIAM & THE NORMANS = X William had promised to let Edwin marry his daughter William’s geld tax (tax to the King) annoyed Anglo and went back on his word. This annoyed Edwin. Saxon Earls, especially when William took it back to Normandy in spring 1067. The Anglo-Saxon earls realised they were paying it and it would not benefit them or the people of England. When William came back from Normandy in 1067 he William’s half-brother Odo of Bayeux took land gave land away to his loyal followers. Anglo-Saxons had illegally. their land grabbed by Normans. Castles were a symbol of Norman power and Powerful Normans such as Odo of Bayeux and dominance. They were hated by Anglo-Saxons as they William FitzOsbern raped Anglo-Saxon women showed the Normans had control. Homes had to be without punishment. cleared for castles to be built and castellans (governor of the castle) called on the people of the area to provide things for the castle. Morcar’s earldom (Northumberland) was also reduced William let Edwin keep his earldom after he in size and some of it given to Copsi an old thegn of conquered England, it was Mercia. However he Tostig’s. This meant loss of power and money for made it smaller and much less important. Morcar. What caused Edwin (Mercia) and Morcar (Northumbria) to revolt in 1068? Reasons key: • LAND = L • PERSONAL = P • UNFAIR LEADERSHIP BY WILLIAM & THE NORMANS = X William had promised to let Edwin marry his daughter William’s geld tax (tax to the King) annoyed Anglo and went back on his word. -
Anglo-Saxon and Norman England 1060-88
Anglo-Saxon and Norman England 1060-88 Key topic 1 – 1060-66 Anglo Saxon England and the Norman Conquest Anglo-Saxon Society population was 2 million, low life expectancy because of infant mortality, almost everyone farmed The King role was to protect his people from attack and make laws for safety at home. Created new laws and ensured they were enforced, controlled the production of silver pennies, owned large estates and granted land to loyal followers and took away land from those who had acted against him. Could raise an army and fleet and decided when taxes were needed. Edward was a respected law maker as he kept peace at home. He was also very pious which many believed would bring God’s blessing to England and that God would direct his actions. In return the duties of the people were to obey the law, no forging of coins, pay tax and fight in return for land, equip fighters. Every boy swore an oath of loyalty to the king when he became 12. Limits to the King’s power half the country was Anglo – Danish – descendants of Vikings – called the Danelaw, accepted Edward’s rule but had more loyalty to their local rulers and customs. Edward also had to deal with the power of the Godwins (see later) Earls – most important after the King – competed against each other to win favour of the King for rewards and honour, sometimes challenged the King to get more power. Controlled huge areas of land for the king – called Earldoms. Responsible for collecting taxes, kept a third of them which was supposed to be used to ensure the earldom was well defended and well run.