DOCSLIB.ORG

Rebellions Against William

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rebellions Against William REBELLIONS AGAINST WILLIAM REVOLT OF EDWIN & MORCAR (1068) REBELLIONS IN THE NORTH (1069) HEREWARD THE WAKE (1070-71) REVOLT OF THE EARLS (1075) Edwin and Morcar (earls of Mercia and One of William’s supporters, Robert The Danes returned to England in This rebellion was different - Normans rebelled as well as Anglo-Saxons. Northumbria) started an uprising in Cumin (earl of northern Northumbria), 1070 and set up in the Fens. The revolt was planned by three earls: Ralph de Gael (Norman), Roger de the north of England; supported by was murdered in Durham. They were helped by local thegn Breteuil (Norman) and Waltheof (Anglo-Saxon). They plotted at Ralph’s Edgar. Then, there was an uprising in York, Hereward the Wake, who was wedding feast. They were upset because William had supported by Edgar (but William’s army fighting a guerrilla war against the Waltheof had links with Denmark – they expected Danish support. made their lands smaller, and they stopped it). Normans. The revolt happened while William was away in Normandy, leaving hated his castles and heavy geld tax. Sep 1069: Edgar joined forces with Sweyn Hereward and the Danes raided Archbishop Lanfranc in charge of England. William stopped the rebellion by of Denmark and attacked York. Their Peterborough Abbey, but the Danes They were angry with William for making their earldoms smaller and chasing after the rebels, building forces scattered, causing small rebellions went back to Denmark with its giving some of their powers to sheriffs. castles as he went. Edwin and Morcar all over the country. treasures! Things went wrong: Waltheof backed out and told Lanfranc, who surrendered. William knew he couldn’t defeat them so The rebellion ended when the threatened to excommunicate Roger; other earls across the country used William forgave the earls but kept he paid the Danes to leave! He then Normans captured Ely. Hereward their troops to block Ralph and Roger in their earldoms; the Danes didn’t them as ‘guests’ in his court. Edgar punished the North to stop future escaped and was never heard of dare fight William! fled to Scotland. rebellion. again. After the revolt, Ralph escaped, Roger was put in prison and Waltheof was executed. Significance: THE SUBMISSION OF THE EARLS (1066) HARRYING OF THE NORTH (1069-70) The revolt showed that some Normans disliked William’s rule, not just After Hastings, the Witan named Edgar king Campaign of destruction to punish the North and Anglo-Saxons. (teenager – weak!) stop them rebelling again. SECURING The earls coming together to stop the revolt shows that many people did support William. William marched towards London, destroying William’s troops destroyed villages, burned crops, NORMAN homes and farms along the way. killed animals and even salted the earth. After the revolt, William continued to come down hard on the Anglo- Important Anglo-Saxon nobles submitted to Many people starved and lost their homes, so had CONTROL Saxons (e.g. Waltheof was executed). William at Berkhamstead (including Edgar, Edwin to leave the region. The threat of a Danish invasion scared William; in 1085, he went to and Morcar). The area was ruined for years afterwards – still extreme lengths to boost England’s defences. William was crowned king Christmas Day 1066. classed as wasteland in Domesday Book 1086! William later regretted being so cruel. MILITARY FORCE MARCHER EARLDOMS HOW WILLIAM KEPT CONTROL LANDHOLDING REWARDING FOLLOWERS William used force 3 new earldoms on the Land was taken off Anglo- CASTLES LEGITIMATE KING when necessary; he Welsh border (trouble- Saxons and given to William encouraged was a feared warrior. spot – history of attacks). Normans, who were less loyalty by rewarding Around 500 motte and bailey William stressed that He forced people to Each was centred on a likely to rebel. followers. castles were built by the Normans. Edward had promised him submit on his way from large town: Hereford, By 1087 less than 5% of land He let Anglo-Saxon This type of castle was new to the throne therefore he Hastings to London, by Shrewsbury & Chester. England. was the rightful king. was held by Anglo-Saxons. earls like Edwin & destroying their homes All 3 were given as 3 ways of taking land: Morcar keep their Built in key locations (e.g. rivers, He travelled around England and farms. rewards to people who forfeit; land grabs; creating land (to start with). borders). so his power was visible. He dealt with had been loyal to William. new earldoms (e.g. He gave land to Quick to build and hard to attack. He held royal ceremonies rebellions harshly, e.g. Marcher earls had special Marchers). family friends, e.g. Physical reminder of Norman (e.g. oath-taking) just as Harrying of the North, rights: could build castles William owned all the land in Odo of Bayeux. power. Anglo-Saxons kings had execution of Waltheof. without asking the king; the country – Anglo-Saxons After Hastings he Key features: bailey, motte done. Using force made paid less tax; more had to pay to keep using it. sent gifts to the (mound), keep, gatehouse, His official seal was put on people afraid to control of the law; smaller When a landholder died Pope and Church palisade fence, ditch. coins and official challenge his rule. & easier to manage than supporters in documents. without an heir, the land other earldoms. went back to William. Normandy. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Odo, Bishop of Bayeux and Earl of Kent
    ( 55 ) ODO, BISHOP OF BAYEUX AND EARL OF KENT. BY SER REGINALD TOWER, K.C.M.G., C.Y.O. IN the volumes of Archceologia Cantiana there occur numerous references to Bishop Odo, half-brother of William the Conqueror ; and his name finds frequent mention in Hasted's History of Kent, chiefly in connection with the lands he possessed. Further, throughout the records of the early Norman chroniclers, the Bishop of Bayeux is constantly cited among the outstanding figures in the reigns of William the Conqueror and of his successor William Rufus, as well as in the Duchy of Normandy. It seems therefore strange that there should be (as I am given to understand) no Life of the Bishop beyond the article in the Dictionary of National Biography. In the following notes I have attempted to collate available data from contemporary writers, aided by later historians of the period during, and subsequent to, the Norman Conquest. Odo of Bayeux was the son of Herluin of Conteville and Herleva (Arlette), daughter of Eulbert the tanner of Falaise. Herleva had .previously given birth to William the Conqueror by Duke Robert of Normandy. Odo's younger brother was Robert, Earl of Morton (Mortain). Odo was born about 1036, and brought up at the Court of Normandy. In early youth, about 1049, when he was attending the Council of Rheims, his half-brother, William, bestowed on him the Bishopric of Bayeux. He was present, in 1066, at the Conference summoned at Lillebonne, by Duke William after receipt of the news of Harold's succession to the throne of England.
    [Show full text]
  • Hereward and the Barony of Bourne File:///C:/Edrive/Medieval Texts/Articles/Geneaology/Hereward.Htm
    hereward and the Barony of Bourne file:///C:/EDrive/Medieval Texts/Articles/Geneaology/hereward.htm Lincolnshire History and Archaeology, 29 (1994), 7-10. Hereward 'the Wake' and the Barony of Bourne: a Reassessment of a Fenland Legend [1] Hereward, generally known as 'the Wake', is second only to Robin Hood in the pantheon of English heroes. From at least the early twelfth century his deeds were celebrated in Anglo-Norman aristocratic circles, and he was no doubt the subject of many a popular tale and song from an early period. [2] But throughout the Middle Ages Hereward's fame was local, being confined to the East Midlands and East Anglia. [3] It was only in the nineteenth century that the rebel became a truly national icon with the publication of Charles Kingsley novel Hereward the Wake .[4] The transformation was particularly Victorian: Hereward is portrayed as a prototype John Bull, a champion of the English nation. The assessment of historians has generally been more sober. Racial overtones have persisted in many accounts, but it has been tacitly accepted that Hereward expressed the fears and frustrations of a landed community under threat. Paradoxically, however, in the light of the nature of that community, the high social standing that the tradition has accorded him has been denied. [5] The earliest recorded notice of Hereward is the almost contemporary annal for 1071 in the D version of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. A Northern recension probably produced at York,[6] its account of the events in the fenland are terse. It records the plunder of Peterborough in 1070 'by the men that Bishop Æthelric [late of Durham] had excommunicated because they had taken there all that he had', and the rebellion of Earls Edwin and Morcar in the following year.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo- Saxon England and the Norman Conquest, 1060-1066
    1.1 Anglo- Saxon society Key topic 1: Anglo- Saxon England and 1.2 The last years of Edward the Confessor and the succession crisis the Norman Conquest, 1060-1066 1.3 The rival claimants for the throne 1.4 The Norman invasion The first key topic is focused on the final years of Anglo-Saxon England, covering its political, social and economic make-up, as well as the dramatic events of 1066. While the popular view is often of a barbarous Dark-Ages kingdom, students should recognise that in reality Anglo-Saxon England was prosperous and well governed. They should understand that society was characterised by a hierarchical system of government and they should appreciate the influence of the Church. They should also be aware that while Edward the Confessor was pious and respected, real power in the 1060s lay with the Godwin family and in particular Earl Harold of Wessex. Students should understand events leading up to the death of Edward the Confessor in 1066: Harold Godwinson’s succession as Earl of Wessex on his father’s death in 1053 inheriting the richest earldom in England; his embassy to Normandy and the claims of disputed Norman sources that he pledged allegiance to Duke William; his exiling of his brother Tostig, removing a rival to the throne. Harold’s powerful rival claimants – William of Normandy, Harald Hardrada and Edgar – and their motives should also be covered. Students should understand the range of causes of Harold’s eventual defeat, including the superior generalship of his opponent, Duke William of Normandy, the respective quality of the two armies and Harold’s own mistakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancestors and Descendants
    ANC ESTO RS AND D ESC END ANTS JO SEPH PAYNE THE SI'TH F E T RIN N Y O W S U . T , ’ Co mpiled by fi ‘ A ’ Edw ard Payri e S che icl l eman ’ ’ “ h Pi rim s faith t he Pi rim s co ur a e T e lg , lg g r ant u s g , St ill Shines t he truth that fo r t he Pilgrim sho ne . A W ORD TO THE CLAN Inasmuch as we have been holding reunions since 32 w d s eem 1 9 , it oul that a genealogical record of this f m w branch of the P ayne a ily ould be of some interest . In collecting data it has been necessary to make nu I f v mer ou s inquiries . have always ound e eryone cour t eous and willing to do their bit . “ Much time and p a tience has been expended in the endeavor to make a correct record and if an error ' is i found vour t olerance s reques ted . In some instances it wa s m b m t i possi le to obtain co ple e dates , therefore blank i pages have been nserted for your convenience . By loaningb old papers letters and legal documents , n Y an r P a . d M s . e . Fannie y Lovej oy , Copenhagen , N , r n nP l t . s . Va e M Martha Pay e , Antwerp , N Y have been esp eci a l l v instrumental in helping us estab lish our line e a e M L over m age .
    [Show full text]
  • Securing the Kingdom 1066-87
    HISTORY – YEAR 10 – WILLIAM I IN POWER: SECURING THE KINGDOM 1066- 1087 A KEY DATES C KEY TERMS The outer part of the castle, surrounding the motte and protected by 1 Bailey 1 1068 Revolt of Edwin and Morcar. a fence or wall. When one country encourages the migration of its people to another 2 Colonisation 2 1069 Rebellions in the north. country. The governor of a castle and its surrounding lands (castlery); its lord Castellan 3 1069-70 The Harrying of the North. 3 or a steward of the local lord. Cutting someone off from the church community so that they are 4 1070-71 Hereward the Wake and the revolt at Ely. unable to confess their sins before they die, which people believed 4 Excommunication would stop them from going to heaven. It was not intended to be 5 1075 The Revolt of the Earls. permanent but to punish someone to make them act correctly to rejoin the church. 1077-80 William in conflict with his son Robert. To lose something as a punishment for committing a crime or bad 6 Forfeit 5 action. 1087 Death of William I. A deliberate and organized attempt to exterminate an entire group of 7 Genocide 6 people. 8 1088 Rebellions against William II. When small bands attack a larger force by surprise and then Guerilla War 7 disappear back into the local population. It is a modern term. 9 1088 Rebellions failed. Odo exiled and disinherited. An archaic (old) word meaning to lay waste to something and to Harrying 8 devastate it.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Origins of Lordship
    THE ANCIENT ORIGINS OF THE LORDSHIP OF BOWLAND Speculation on Anglo-Saxon, Anglo-Norse and Brythonic roots William Bowland The standard history of the lordship of Bowland begins with Domesday. Roger de Poitou, younger son of one of William the Conqueror’s closest associates, Roger de Montgomery, Earl of Shrewsbury, is recorded in 1086 as tenant-in-chief of the thirteen manors of Bowland: Gretlintone (Grindleton, then caput manor), Slatebourne (Slaidburn), Neutone (Newton), Bradeforde (West Bradford), Widitun (Waddington), Radun (Radholme), Bogeuurde (Barge Ford), Mitune (Great Mitton), Esingtune (Lower Easington), Sotelie (Sawley?), Hamereton (Hammerton), Badresbi (Battersby/Dunnow), Baschelf (Bashall Eaves). William Rufus It was from these holdings that the Forest and Liberty of Bowland emerged sometime after 1087. Further lands were granted to Poitou by William Rufus, either to reward him for his role in defeating the army of Scots king Malcolm III in 1091-2 or possibly as a consequence of the confiscation of lands from Robert de Mowbray, Earl of Northumbria in 1095. 1 As a result, by the first decade of the twelfth century, the Forest and Liberty of Bowland, along with the adjacent fee of Blackburnshire and holdings in Hornby and Amounderness, had been brought together to form the basis of what became known as the Honor of Clitheroe. Over the next two centuries, the lordship of Bowland followed the same descent as the Honor, ultimately reverting to the Crown in 1399. This account is one familiar to students of Bowland history. However, research into the pattern of land holdings prior to the Norman Conquest is now beginning to uncover origins for the lordship that predate Poitou’s lordship by many centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo–Saxon and Norman England
    GCSE HISTORY Anglo–Saxon and Norman England Module booklet. Your Name: Teacher: Target: History Module Booklet – U2B- Anglo-Saxon & Norman England, 1060-88 Checklist Anglo-Saxon society and the Norman conquest, 1060-66 Completed Introduction to William of Normandy 2-3 Anglo-Saxon society 4-5 Legal system and punishment 6-7 The economy and social system 8 House of Godwin 9-10 Rivalry for the throne 11-12 Battle of Gate Fulford & Stamford Bridge 13 Battle of Hastings 14-16 End of Key Topic 1 Test 17 William I in power: Securing the kingdom, 1066-87 Page Submission of the Earls 18 Castles and the Marcher Earldoms 19-20 Revolt of Edwin and Morcar, 1068 21 Edgar Aethling’s revolts, 1069 22-24 The Harrying of the North, 1069-70 25 Hereward the Wake’s rebellion, 1070-71 26 Maintaining royal power 27-28 The revolt of the Earls, 1075 29-30 End of Key Topic 2 Test 31 Norman England, 1066-88 Page The Norman feudal system 32 Normans and the Church 33-34 Everyday life - society and the economy 35 Norman government and legal system 36-38 Norman aristocracy 39 Significance of Odo, Bishop of Bayeux 40 William I and his family 41-42 William, Robert and revolt in Normandy, 1077-80 43 Death, disputes and revolts, 1087-88 44 End of Key Topic 3 test 45 1 History Module Booklet – U2B- Anglo-Saxon & Norman England, 1060-88 2 History Module Booklet – U2B- Anglo-Saxon & Norman England, 1060-88 KT1 – Anglo-Saxon society and the Normans, 1060-66 Introduction On the evening of 14 October 1066 William of Normandy stood on the battlefield of Hastings.
    [Show full text]
  • Hie Est Wadard: Vassal of Odo of Bayeux Or Miles and Frater of St Augustine's, Canterbury?'
    Reading Medieval Studies XL (20 14) Hie est Wadard: Vassal of Odo of Bayeux or Miles and Frater of St Augustine's, Canterbury?' Stephen D. White Emory University On the Bayeux Embroidery, the miles identified as Wadard by the accompanying inscription (W 46: Hie est Wadarcf) has long been known as a 'vassal' of William l's uterine brother, Odo of Bayeux (or de Conteville), who was Bishop of Bayeux from 104911050 until his death in 1097; earl of Kent from e. 1067 until hi s exile in 1088; and prior to his imprisonment in 1082, the greatest and most powerful landholder after the king.' Wadard appears just after Duke William's invading army has landed at Pevensey (W 43) and four of his milites have hurried to Hastings to seize food (W 44-5: Et hie milites festinaverunt hestinga lit eibum raperentur).' On horseback, clad in a hauberk and armed with a shield and spear, Wadard supervises as animals are brought to be slaughtered by an axe-wielding figure (W 45) and then cooked (W 46). Writing in 1821, Charles Stoddard was unable to identify Wadard, because written accounts of the conquest never mention him .4 Nevertheless, he cited his image, along with those of two other men called Turold (W 11) and Vital (W 55), as evidence that the hanging must have dated from 'the time of the Conquest', when its designer and audience could still have known of men as obscure as Wadard and the other two obviously were.' In 1833, Wadard was first identified authoritatively as Odo's 'sub-tenant' by Henry Ellis in A General introduction to Domesday Book, though as far back as 1821 Thomas Amyot had I am deeply indebted to Kate Gilbert fo r her work in researching and editing this article and to Elizabeth Carson Pastan for her helpful suggestions and criticisms.
    [Show full text]
  • ECTD 284 TITLE: a Survey of English Beekeeping in 1086
    ECTD_284 TITLE: A survey of English beekeeping in 1086 SOURCE: Bee Craft: 82(12): 359 - 360 DATE: 1999 Reproduced with permission © Eva Crane Trust k. A survey of English beekeeping in 1086 Dr Eva Crane looks at In East Anglia, a hive was referred to as Vasa apum, probably a coiled-straw beekeeping records in the skep, or as rusca apum, possibly a skep Domesday Book woven from stems of Butcher's Broom, he survey of England recorded in Ruscus apum. Elsewhere, the hives were Domesday Book was made in mentioned only in Huntingdonshire - and T 1086 by the order of King Wil­ in Herefordshire where the word used was liam I who had conquered the country in vasculum, a small hive which was probably 1066. In the 1920s, Graham Burtt of a wicker skep. Several centuries earlier, Gloucester copied out a number of extracts around 705, Aldhelm, the abbot of Mal- that related to beekeeping, using county mesbury in Wiltshire and later bishop of translations then available, and the extracts Sherborne in Dorset, had mentioned hives were later deposited in the Library of the in his writings. He said that they were little International Bee Research Association. A huts constructed of osiers, or made from complete English translation of Domesday bark stitched together to make a hollow. Book was published from 1970 onwards The first description suggests that wicker and this contains the widest survey of skeps were in use and that straw skeps had beekeeping made in England until the pre­ not yet reached Wiltshire. No other refer­ sent century.
    [Show full text]
  • Domesday Book
    Domesday Book (Liber de Wintonia "Book of Winchester") is a manuscript record of the "Great Survey" of much of England and parts of Wales completed in 1086 by order of King William the Conqueror. The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle states: Then, at the midwinter [1085], was the king in Gloucester with his council ... After this had the king a large meeting, and very deep consultation with his council, about this land; how it was occupied, and by what sort of men. Then sent he his men over all England into each shire; commissioning them to find out "How many hundreds of hides were in the shire, what land the king himself had, and what stock upon the land; or, what dues he ought to have by the year from the shire." When the Domesday Survey was made in 1086, most of Cumbria was in Strathclyde (eventually part of Scotland) outside his realm - and North Lancashire and South Westmorland were treated as part of the West Riding of Yorkshire. [See wikipedia entry Strathclyde] The only parts of Cumbria to be included in Domesday were the southernmost parts, south- west of Cumberland, Lancashire (North of the Sands) and the south of Westmorland. Places in the Furness peninsula were listed under the lost name of "Hougun", which was held by Earl Tosti, and rated at four carucates of land. Other names in this area include Sourebi (Sowerby), Daltune (Dalton), Rosse (Roose) and Glasserton (Gleaston). The rest of Cumbria was not considered part of England until 1092 when William the Conqueror's son, William Rufus, took control of Cumberland and Westmorland.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NORMAN CONQUEST Late Jan 1066 – William Started to Build a Fleet Year the French-Speaking William of Normandy Was in and Gathered His Army Together Charge
    OVERVIEW HISTORY KNOWLEDGE 1066 TIMELINE In 1066 the King of England, Edward the Confessor, ORGANISER 5th Jan 1066 – Edward the Confessor died died without an heir. Three men all competed for the th YEAR 7 – TERM 2 6 Jan 1066 – Godwinson crowned King throne, resulting in two key battles. By the end of the THE NORMAN CONQUEST Late Jan 1066 – William started to build a fleet year the French-speaking William of Normandy was in and gathered his army together charge. th 12 Aug 1066 – William was ready to depart Many Saxons rebelled against their new King as he Late May 1066 – Tostig arrived in England was an invading foreigner. William had to work hard 18th Sept 1066 – Hardrada arrived to gain full control of his new kingdom, and it took 25th Sept 1066 – Battle of Stamford Bridge him 5 years to gain control over the whole country. 28th Sept 1066 – William arrived in England He used various methods, including terror as well as nd rewarding loyalty. A new system of taxation also 2 Oct 1066 – Godwinson began marching south made him a rich and powerful king. 13th Oct 1066 – Godwinson arrived at Hastings KEY TERMS 14th Oct 1066 – Battle of Hastings KEY INDIVIDUALS Bayeux Tapestry – a Norman embroidery 25th Dec 1066 – William crowned at Edward the Confessor - Saxon King of England who depicting the events of 1066 Westminster Abbey died in 1066 without an heir Cavalry – soldiers on horseback Claimants – people who believed they had Harold Godwinson - Saxon noble who became King a right to the throne WILLIAM’S METHODS OF CONTROL when Edward died Conquest – to take over a country The Harrying of the North – the destruction of villages Harald Hardrada - King of Norway who invaded in Coronation – ceremony to crown a and crops in the North of England where rebellions 1066 and lost the Battle of Stamford Bridge monarch Heir – a person who inherits something.
    [Show full text]
  • Norman Consolidation of Power Level
    Key Words, Week 1: Key Individuals, Week 2: History, Y9 T1b: Norman Consolidation of Power Revolt A rebellion against the ruler of a country William the Norman king of England, ruled from 1066 (those rebelling are known as rebels). Conqueror to 1087. Level: Grade 5 (compulsory) Regent A trusted advisor to the king that was allowed Edwin and Morcar Anglo-Saxon earls of Mercia and to run the country while he was absent. Northumbria. Submitted in 1066, but later Key dates, Week 3: th Motte and A castle which was easy to build, used by the rebelled multiple times. 25 Dec William crowned king at Westminster bailey Normans to control England soon after the Edgar Atheling An Anglo-Saxon claimant to the throne. 1066 Abbey. Conquest. Allied with the Scots and the Danes to Aug A major rebellion in the north, led by Landholder The person that lives on the land, effectively fight William. 1068 Edwin and Morcar. renting it from the king. Robert de A Norman earl, given the job of subduing Jan 1069 Robert de Comines was burned to death Landowner The person who actually owns the land. After Comines Northumbria. Burned to death by rebels. by rebels in Durham. 1066, the king was the only landowner in Hereward the An Anglo-Saxon thegn and rebel who took Sept The Danes invaded and supported the England. Wake Ely. 1069 Anglo-Saxon rebellion, led by Edgar. Tenure The process by which you held land from the William fitzOsbern Loyal followers of William and his regents Oct 1069 William paid off the Danes and defeated king.
    [Show full text]