Attachment Member Richard Northey Report Sept
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Annual Report 2013/14
ANNUAL REPORT 2013/14 HAMILTON’S 2013/14 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS MESSAGE FROM YOUR MAYOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE 2 YOUR COUNCIL 3 OUR VISION FOR HAMILTON 5 COUNCIL'S BOOKS ARE IN GOOD SHAPE 8 SERVICE PERFORMANCE 14 ARTS AND RECREATION: Libraries, pools, Hamilton Zoo, Waikato Museum, 16 theatres, sports parks, arts promotion, indoor recreation CITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT: Planning guidance and compliance, 23 city planning CITY PROSPERITY: Economic development, strategic property investment, 26 Claudelands, Waikato Stadium, Seddon Park CITY SAFETY: Animal control, building control, environmental health and 29 public safety COMMUNITY SERVICES: Emergency management, community investment, 33 housing, cemeteries, crematorium DEMOCRACY: Governance, civic functions, partnership with Maaori 38 PARKS AND OPEN SPACES: Amenity parks, Hamilton Gardens, natural areas, 42 streetscapes SOLID WASTE: Rubbish and recycling collection, waste minimisation, landfill 46 site management STORMWATER: Stormwater network, catchment management 48 TRANSPORTATION: Transport network, travel demand management, 50 parking management WASTEWATER: Wastewater collection, treatment and disposal 56 WATER SUPPLY: Treatment, storage, distribution, demand management 59 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 62 Statement of Comprehensive Income 63 Statement of Changes in Equity 63 Statement of Financial Position 64 Statement of Cash Flows 65 Notes to the Financial Statements 66 Funding Impact Statements 115 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 128 INFORMATION ON COUNCIL CONTROLLED ORGANISATIONS 133 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE 140 AUDIT REPORT 141 H A M I L T O N C I T Y C O U N C I L From your MAYOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE We are pleased to report that in 2013/14 Decisions released in July 2014 have resulted in a Council has continued to deliver on its number of changes to rules around development. -
Insert Committee Name
STRATEGY AND POLICY COMMITTEE 22 MAY 2008 REPORT 8 (1215/52/IM) COMMUNITIES FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION FORUM, HAMILTON, 2 APRIL 2008 1. Purpose of Report To report on the attendance of the Mayor and Councillors’ Ahipene-Mercer and Wade-Brown at the ‘Communities for Climate Change Protection’ Forum in Hamilton on 2 April 2008. 2. Recommendations It is recommended that the Committee: 1. Receive the information. 3. Background The Communities for Climate Protection New Zealand (CCP–NZ) programme aims to empower local Councils to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from their operations and communities. CCP-NZ is supported by the International Council for Local Environment Initiatives (ICLEI) and is part of the international Cities for Climate Protection campaign. Since CCP-NZ was launched in 2004, Councils representing over 80% of the country’s population, including Wellington City Council, have joined the programme. The second national Forum for Communities for Climate Protection was hosted by Hamilton City Council on Wednesday 2 April 2008 at Le Grand Hotel Conference Centre. Mayor Bob Simcock opened the Forum, which was attended by over 100 delegates including representatives from 30 New Zealand councils1. 4. Discussion The Forum was broken into five sessions: • Global view • New Zealand carbon neutrality 1 CCP-NZ Participant councils: Auckland City, Auckland Regional, Carterton District, Christchurch City, Dunedin City, Environment Canterbury, Environment Waikato Regional, Franklin District, Greater Wellington Regional, Hamilton City, Hawke’s Bay Regional, Kapiti Coast District, Manukau City, Masterton District, Nelson City, New Plymouth District Council, North Shore City, Papakura District, Porirua City, Rodney District, Rotorua District, South Waikato District, Waipa District, Waitakere City, Wellington City Other councils: Environment Bay of Plenty, Hutt City, Otorohanga District, Taupo District, Tauranga City, Western Bay of Plenty District (not currently CCP-NZ) • Parallel interactive workshops • Big picture approaches • Plenary sessions. -
Long Term Plan 2018-2028
ISSN 1173-4477 Napier City Council Long Term Plan 2018-2028 Adopted 29 June 2018 Napier City Council Phone: 06 835 7579 215 Hastings Street Email: [email protected] Private Bag 6010 Website: napier.govt.nz Napier 4142 Contents Other Rating Matters �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������166 Fees and Charges ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������166 Mayor’s Message ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 Indicative Rates ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������167 2018-2028 Long Term Plan �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������2 Examples of Rates for 2018/19 ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������169 Napier City ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 5 Financial Prudence Benchmarks ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������170 Strategic Priorities ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 9 Council Controlled Organisations �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������174 -
Inquiry Into the 2014 General Election
EMC Submission No 15 Part E Inquiry into the 2014 general election Report of the Justice and Electoral Committee Fifty-first Parliament (Jacqui Dean, Chairperson) April 2016 Presented to the House of Representatives 1 I.7A INQUIRY INTO THE 2014 GENERAL ELECTION 2 INQUIRY INTO THE 2014 GENERAL ELECTION I.7A Contents Summary of recommendations 5 1 Introduction 8 2 The Electoral Commission 10 3 Participation and turnout 12 Declining voter participation 12 Initiatives for improving voter participation in the 2014 general election 13 Improving voter participation for the future 14 4 Enrolment 17 The one-month rule 17 Accuracy and completeness of the roll, and automatic enrolment 18 Election day enrolment 19 Availability of the roll 20 Electronic roll look-up and roll mark-off 21 Closing the roll 21 5 Voting and election day processes 22 Advance voting 22 Preliminary count 24 Voter identification 24 Special vote processing 25 Overseas voting 25 Dictation voting 26 Online voting 27 Services to voters 27 Administrative and operational matters 30 6 Broadcasting and election advertising 31 The broadcasting regime 31 Restrictions on campaigning: advance voting and election day 33 Social media and election day 35 7 Regulatory framework 36 MMP 36 Nominations 36 Electoral finance 37 Electorate boundaries 37 8 Minority view 39 3 I.7A INQUIRY INTO THE 2014 GENERAL ELECTION New Zealand Labour Party minority view 39 Appendices 40 Appendix A: Committee procedures and members 40 Appendix B: List of submitters 41 4 INQUIRY INTO THE 2014 GENERAL ELECTION I.7A Summary of recommendations Summary of recommendations The Justice and Electoral Committee recommends to the Government that it consider the following: The Electoral Commission Updating the Electoral Act 1993 and Regulations to remove references in the Act to the historical separation of services between the Chief Electoral Office, the Electoral Enrolment Centre, and the Electoral Commission. -
Comparative Local Governance: Lessons from New Zealand for Japan
Comparative Local Governance: Lessons from New Zealand for Japan by Harufumi Shiba A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Public Policy School of Government Victoria University of Wellington 2008 Abstract This study concerns local governance in Japan and whether lessons can be derived from New Zealand and other countries. There are significant differences in the constitutional arrangements of Japan and New Zealand and the history and cultural influences that shape local governance in each country. The case studies, which compare three different policy areas in both countries, confirm, however, the usefulness of the comparative analysis. This is not a parallel comparison; the focus is more on lesson learning from different systems and styles of local administrations. The Japanese local government sector is more subject to control and guidance from the centre. A premise of this study is that that a greater degree of autonomy for local government in Japan will be beneficial. ‘Governance’ is a term used in different ways in many contexts. In this study emphasis is placed on the ‘means for achieving direction, control and coordination of individual or organizational units on behalf of their common interests’ (Hill and Lynn Jr, 2004, p. 6). It is associated with the notion of ‘steering’ rather than ‘rowing (Osborne and Gaebler, 1993). Governance is not synonymous with government . In a decentralised environment, local governance concerns the way different interests are settled among, broadly, central government , local authorities and communities . The power balance among central government, local authorities and communities is at the centre of analysis in this study. -
Roll of Members of the New Zealand House of Representatives, 1854 Onwards
Roll of members of the New Zealand House of Representatives, 1854 onwards Sources: New Zealand Parliamentary Record, Newspapers, Political Party websites, New Zealand Gazette, New Zealand Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), Political Party Press Releases, Appendix to the Journal of the House of Representatives, E.9. Last updated: 17 November 2020 Abbreviations for the party affiliations are as follows: ACT ACT (Association of Consumers and Taxpayers) Lib. Liberal All. Alliance LibLab. Liberal Labour CD Christian Democrats Mana Mana Party Ch.H Christian Heritage ManaW. Mana Wahine Te Ira Tangata Party Co. Coalition Maori Maori Party Con. Conservative MP Mauri Pacific CR Coalition Reform Na. National (1925 Liberals) CU Coalition United Nat. National Green Greens NatLib. National Liberal Party (1905) ILib. Independent Liberal NL New Labour ICLib. Independent Coalition Liberal NZD New Zealand Democrats Icon. Independent Conservative NZF New Zealand First ICP Independent Country Party NZL New Zealand Liberals ILab. Independent Labour PCP Progressive Coalition ILib. Independent Liberal PP Progressive Party (“Jim Anderton’s Progressives”) Ind. Independent R Reform IP. Independent Prohibition Ra. Ratana IPLL Independent Political Labour League ROC Right of Centre IR Independent Reform SC Social Credit IRat. Independent Ratana SD Social Democrat IU Independent United U United Lab. Labour UFNZ United Future New Zealand UNZ United New Zealand The end dates of tenure before 1984 are the date the House was dissolved, and the end dates after 1984 are the date of the election. (NB. There were no political parties as such before 1890) Name Electorate Parl’t Elected Vacated Reason Party ACLAND, Hugh John Dyke 1904-1981 Temuka 26-27 07.02.1942 04.11.1946 Defeated Nat. -
Voting in New Zealand Local Government Elections: the Need to Encourage Greater Voter Turnout
RESEARCH and EVALUATION (PEER REVIEWED) Voting in New Zealand local government elections: the need to encourage greater voter turnout Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance Issue 24: June 2021 http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/ojs/index.php/cjlg Andy Asquith School of Management Massey University Palmerston North 4442 New Zealand Email: [email protected] Karen Webster School of Clinical Sciences Auckland University of Technology Auckland 0632 New Zealand Email: [email protected] Andrew Cardow School of Management Massey University Palmerston North 4442 New Zealand Email: [email protected] Abstract Within a global context, local government in New Zealand occupies an enviable position: it enjoys both a statutorily-defined ‘power of general competence’ and financial autonomy from central government. However, despite this, voter turnout rates in New Zealand local elections continue to fall as ever fewer New Zealanders engage in this fundamental act of civic engagement. This review article examines the decline in voting over the last four New Zealand local government elections (2010/13/16/19). It aims to do three things: plot the decline; identify and analyse the causes of this decline; and suggest ways in which the decline might be countered. The authors reach the conclusion that local government in New Zealand is at a crossroads – it will either be rejuvenated as a source of local democracy and prosper, or decline into an administrative arm of central government. Keywords: Local government, elections, citizen engagement, New Zealand DOI: https://doi.org/10.5130/cjlg.vi24.7541 Article History: Received 18/12/20; Accepted 31/05/21; Published 28/06/21 Citation: Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance 2021, 24: 79-97, https://doi.org/10.5130/cjlg.vi24.7541 © 2021 Andy Asquith, Karen Webster and Andrew Cardow. -
Blogs, Political Discussion and the 2005 New Zealand General Election
Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Blogs, Political Discussion and the 2005 New Zealand General Election Kane Hopkins A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD in Communication at Massey University February 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This whole thing was Susan Fountaine's idea - for that, along with her wisdom and kindness, I will be eternallygra teful- I think. I would like to thank my supervisors, Dr Nikki Hessell and Dr Donald Matheson, for their support throughout the research project. Their competence and insights were important and they have both shown themselves to be almost saintly by their ability to put up with my frustrations and confusion, and somehow turnthat into a structure to work from. Kudos goes to all my colleagues and friends at Massey University, Palmerston North, notably Robyn Mason, Elspeth Tilley, Doug Ashwell, Elizabeth Gray, Nigel Lowe and Marianne Tremaine, fo r your support, assistance, and especially your understanding. A special mention needs to go to Sharon Benson and Christine I Morrison for their support and keeping me sane. \ I need to thank my parents Jenny and Doug Elliott fo r their support and my friends fo r I enduring my long periods of social absence and regular irritability. Extra special thanks need to go to Anna, my understanding wife, who has supported me all the way through. -
Brochure GLOBE
Global Legislators for a Balanced Environment (GLOBE) ‘Unlocking New Zealand’s Mitigation Opportunities’ GLOBE-NZ Consultancy Project As part of its work, GLOBE-NZ is contracting a London-based consultancy firm, Vivid Economics Ltd, to complete an independent report on alternative pathways for New Zealand’s transformation toward a low-emission economy. Drawing from New Zealand information sources and international best practice, the report will assess mitigation opportunities, costs and co-benefits; barriers to progress; and integrated policy options for unlocking mitigation opportunities. Vivid has conducted previous work on climate change mitigation and green growth in New Zealand. This project covers the period Sept. 2016 to February 2017. To enable engagement with New Zealand experts and sector representatives, it will include a series of visits to New Zealand by members of Vivid over that period. The first visit (21- 29 Sept.) involved the Director of Vivid, John Ward. It was Mr Ward’s intention to gain an initial insight into the current (post-Paris) climate policy situation in New Zealand, brief key experts and sector groups on the project, and set the stage for more in-depth engagement during a visit by members of Vivid’s broader team starting in late November. The funding for the project is provided by New Zealand-based foundations, companies and individuals, and also by Wellington-based embassies.1 By enabling an independent synthesis of the latest information on climate change mitigation opportunities in New Zealand and international best practice, we hope that this project will help to inform parliamentary debate and deliberation and future decision-making by government, business and civil society. -
2019 Local Elections Preliminary Results – Mayor, Local Board
Result: LGE 2019 - Preliminary Result Type: Preliminary Candidates sorted by: Votes Generated on: Sunday 13 October 2019 Elections: Auckland Council Election: 01 - Auckland Council Issue: Mayor - Auckland Council Number of vacancies: 1 Candidate Voting ID Candidate Name Affiliation Votes Received Rank 105 GOFF, Phil Independent 176599 1 118 TAMIHERE, John JT for Mayor.co.nz 79551 111 LORD, Craig Independent 29032 108 HONG, John Independent 15965 109 JOHNSTON, Ted 15401 119 VAUGHAN, Peter 6127 102 COOTE, Michael Independent 5530 101 CHEEL, Tricia STOP Trashing Our Planet 4013 114 O'CONNOR, Phil Christians Against Abortion 3917 110 KRUGER, Susanna Justice for Families 2840 104 FORDE, Genevieve 2824 115 SAINSBURY, Tom Independent 2804 116 SNELGAR, Glen Old Skool 2576 117 STOPFORD, Tadhg Tim The Hemp Foundation 2380 107 HENRY, Jannaha 2356 103 FEIST, David John LiftNZ 2259 112 MADDERN, Brendan Bruce Independent 1430 121 YOUNG, Wayne Virtual Homeless Community 1388 120 VERMUNT, Annalucia Communist League 1030 113 NGUYEN, Thanh Binh Independent 941 106 HENETI, Alezix 507 122 Informal 1558 123 Blank 6982 Election: 01 - Auckland Council Issue: Albany Ward Number of vacancies: 2 Candidate Voting ID Candidate Name Affiliation Votes Received Rank 224 WATSON, John Putting People First 28073 1 223 WALKER, Wayne Putting People First 24371 2 222 PARFITT, Julia Independent 19884 221 HENETI, Alezix 3167 225 Informal 23 226 Blank 2989 Election: 01 - Auckland Council Issue: Albert-Eden-Puketāpapa Ward Number of vacancies: 2 Candidate Voting ID Candidate -
An Overview of Genetic Modification in New Zealand 1973–2013: the First Forty Years
September 2013 Report 16 2058 An Overview of Genetic Modification in New Zealand 1973–2013 The first forty years Project 2058: Report 16 September 2013 ŶKǀĞƌǀŝĞǁŽĨ'ĞŶĞƟĐ DŽĚŝĮĐĂƟŽŶŝŶ EĞǁĞĂůĂŶĚϭϵϳϯʹϮϬϭϯ dŚĞĮƌƐƚĨŽƌƚLJLJĞĂƌƐ This report forms part of Project 2058, ƚŚĞ/ŶƐƟƚƵƚĞ͛ƐŇĂŐƐŚŝƉƉƌŽũĞĐƚ Title An Overview of Genetic Modification in New Zealand 1973–2013: The First Forty Years Published Copyright © McGuinness Institute Limited, 30 September 2013 ISBN 978-1-972193-35-8 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-972193-36-5 (PDF) This document is available at www.mcguinnessinstitute.org and may be reproduced or cited provided the source is acknowledged. Prepared by The McGuinness Institute, as part of Project 2058 Authors Wendy McGuinness and Renata Mokena-Lodge Research team Niki Lomax, Hannah Steiner and Grace White For further information McGuinness Institute Phone (04) 499 8888 Level 2, 5 Cable Street PO Box 24222 Wellington 6142 New Zealand www.mcguinnessinstitute.org Disclaimer The McGuinness Institute has taken reasonable care in collecting and presenting the information provided in this publication. However, the Institute makes no representation or endorsement that this resource will be relevant or appropriate for its readers’ purposes and does not guarantee the accuracy of the information at any particular time for any particular purpose. The Institute is not liable for any adverse consequences, whether they be direct or indirect, arising from reliance on the content of this publication. Where this publication contains links to any website or other source, such links are provided solely for information purposes and the Institute is not liable for the content of such website or other source. Publishing This publication has been produced by companies applying sustainable practices within their businesses. -
Public Understandings of Biotechnology in New Zealand: Nature, Clean Green Image and Spirituality
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Lincoln University Research Archive Public Understandings of Biotechnology in New Zealand: Nature, Clean Green Image and Spirituality Fiona J Coyle Crystal Maslin John R Fairweather and Lesley M Hunt Research Report No. 265 October 2003 u '0101 U. u~'ou U~IV[lSlTr, c.~nRlu.v IISO. /lEW UAUIID Studies in Innovation and Change Public Understandings of Biotechnology in New Zealand: Nature, Clean Green Image and Spirituality Fiona J Coyle Crystal Maslin John R Fairweather and Lesley M Hunt November 2003 Research Report No. 265 Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit P O Box 84 Lincoln University Canterbury New Zealand Ph: (64) (3) 325 2811 Fax: (64) (3) 325 3847 http://www.lincoln.ac.nz/AERU/ ISSN 1170-7682 ISBN 0-909042-XX-X i ii Contents LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................V PREFACE.............................................................................................................................VII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................. IX SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... XI CHAPTER 1 BIOTECHNOLOGY IN NEW ZEALAND: ISSUES AND CHALLENGES........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Biotechnology .........................................................................................................1