<<

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS week ending PRL 100, 024301 (2008) 18 JANUARY 2008

Scattering Theory Derivation of a 3D Acoustic Cloaking Shell

Steven A. Cummer,1,* Bogdan-Ioan Popa,1 David Schurig,2 David R. Smith,1 John Pendry,3 Marco Rahm,1 and Anthony Starr4 1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA 2Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA 3Department of , The Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College , London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom 4SensorMetrix, Inc., San Diego, California 92121, USA (Received 26 September 2007; revised manuscript received 16 November 2007; published 14 January 2008) Through acoustic theory we derive the mass density and bulk modulus of a spherical shell that can eliminate scattering from an arbitrary object in the interior of the shell—in other words, a 3D acoustic cloaking shell. Calculations confirm that the pressure and velocity fields are smoothly bent and excluded from the central region as for previously reported electromagnetic cloaking shells. The shell requires an anisotropic mass density with principal axes in the spherical coordinate directions and a radially dependent bulk modulus. The existence of this 3D cloaking shell indicates that such reflectionless solutions may also exist for other systems that are not isomorphic with electromagnetics.

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.024301 PACS numbers: 43.20.+g Pendry et al. [1] have shown that arbitrary coordinate outset. With a expi!t time dependence, these equa- transformations of Maxwell’s equations can be interpreted tions of motion are in terms of an electromagnetic material in the original

rp i! r v; (1) coordinates with transformed permittivity and permeabil- 0 ity values. Consequently, the bending and stretching of

i!p r rv; (2) electromagnetic fields specified by coordinate transforma- 0 tions can be implemented with electromagnetic materials, where p is scalar pressure, v is vector fluid velocity, is the enabling unexpected and interesting solutions such as elec- inhomogeneous fluid bulk modulus relative to 0, and is tromagnetic cloaking [1,2]. an inhomogeneous generalized fluid mass density tensor The degree to which this cloaking concept can be ex- relative to 0. These equations are the fluid version of the tended to other classes of is not known in general. more general elastodynamic equations considered in [5]. Miller [3] described an active approach for general wave Although anisotropic mass density is not a property com- cloaking based on sensing and nonlocal retransmission of monly encountered in natural materials, it naturally arises signals on the surface of an object. Leonhardt [4] has in the analysis of elastodynamics of strongly inhomoge- described how a 2D object can be cloaked in the short neous composite materials [8]. It is important to note that wavelength limit in a way that also applies to different the anisotropic mass density in (1) is an effective dynamic classes of waves. Milton et al. [5] showed that the coor- mass density that is not necessarily tied to the physical dinate transform approach cannot be extended in general to mass density of any of the individual elements of a com- elastic media. Cummer and Schurig [6] showed, however, posite material [9,10]. Milton et al. [5] describe a simple an exact analogy exists between 2D electromagnetics and conceptual model based on mass-loaded springs embedded acoustics for anisotropic materials and therefore that a 2D in a host matrix that is described by an anisotropic mass acoustic cloaking shell exists. This isomorphism does not density. An applied force near the internal resonant fre- extend to three dimensions, however, which means that a quency of such an inclusion will produce large motions 3D acoustic cloaking shell, if it exists, is different from its thereby giving the medium a small effective mass density. electromagnetic counterpart. If the internal springs vary with direction, the effective Chen et al. [7] performed a spherical harmonic scatter- mass density will also vary with direction and thus be ing analysis of the 3D spherical cloaking shell described in anisotropic. A composite material containing anisotropic [1] and confirmed that this shell renders any object in its mechanically resonant inclusions in a fluid host matrix will interior free of scattering in all directions. Here we use obey the scalar stress-strain relation because of the fluid scattering analysis as the starting point to derive a set of matrix yet will have an anisotropic dynamic response, and acoustic material parameters for a shell that renders a 3D therefore an anisotropic dynamic mass density, when object in the interior of the shell free of acoustic scattering. forces are applied. For an inviscid fluid with zero shear modulus, the small We consider these fields in a domain shown in Fig. 1,in perturbation dynamics are described by conservation of which a uniform fluid of isotropic density 0 and bulk and the stress-strain relation. Because [6] modulus 0 is present for r>band r

0031-9007=08=100(2)=024301(4) 024301-1 © 2008 The American Physical Society PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS week ending PRL 100, 024301 (2008) 18 JANUARY 2008 2 @ r @f 2 2 k0 r nn 1 f 0; (5) @r r @r where we have used the wave number in the background 2 2 2 medium k0 ! =vp0. The resulting equations for g and h are in standard form (e.g., [11]) and their solu- tions are the associated Legendre functions g m K0Pn cos (the other Legendre function has been ex- cluded because of the domain) and the azimuthal harmon- ics hK1 cosm K2 sinm.However,(5) is not in general the spherical Bessel equation because of the r dependence of the acoustic properties of the shell. Chen et al. [7] showed that an important element in making the 3D electromagnetic cloaking shell scatter- free is a radial shift from r to r a in the equation for FIG. 1. The problem domain, in which a compressional uni- fr (which is the Riccati-Bessel equation in the electro- form plane wave propagating along the 0 direction is incident on a material shell with inner radius a and outer radius magnetic case) that is produced by the radially dependent b. parameters of the medium. Recognizing this as one poten- tial path for realizing a scatter-free shell, we now find the the shell from the 0 direction, without loss of conditions on r, , and that transform (5) into the generality. standard spherical Bessel equation in r a. These con- Symmetry dictates that if a cloaking shell exists, its ditions are scattering parameters must be independent of the incident r2 r a2 wave direction. Therefore, its material properties must ; (6) depend only on radius, and the principal axes of the mass r k1 density tensor must be aligned with spherical coordinate directions. The material properties to be determined are k1; (7) rr, r, r, and r. Moreover, symmetry implies that r r . These parameters are all assumed to be 2 2 2 2 k0r kshr a ; (8) normalized with respect to the background density 0 and bulk modulus 0. It is straightforward to show that p satisfies the equation where k1 and ksh are constants to be determined later. Under these conditions (5) becomes !2 1 @ 2 @f 2 2 r rp p 0: (3) r a k r a nn 1f 0; (9) @r @r sh

We first focus on the solution to (3) inside the anisotropic which has the solution frbnkshr a, where bnx shell. In this region and in spherical coordinates, this is a spherical Bessel or Hankel function of order n. equation becomes The total pressure field in all regions can now be ex- pressed. For r>b, the spherical expansion of the incident 2 2 ! 2 @ r @p @ @p compressional plane wave gives 2 r p sin vp0 @r r @r sin @ @ X1 inc p K j k rP cos; (10) @2p n n 0 n 0; n0 2 @2 sin n where Kn i 2n 1 and Pncos is the nth degree (4) Legendre polynomial. The scattered field is subject to the condition and, because of the azimuthal invari- where we have used the compressionalp wave velocity in the ance of the source and geometry, can be written as background medium vp0 0=0 and rr. X1 The azimuthal mass density elements have been moved scat 1 p A h k rP cos; (11) outside their derivatives because of their purely radial n n 0 n n0 dependence. 1 Letting pr; ; frgh through separation with hn k0r the spherical Hankel function of the first of variables and after multiplying all terms by kind, and An are constants to be determined by the bound- 1 sin, the ordinary differential equation for fr ary conditions. For a

X1 X1 sh scat k0 10 p Bnjnkshr aPncos; (12) vr Anhn k0rPncos; (16) n0 i!0 n0 X1 where the jn spherical is used to ensure the sh ksh 0 v B j k r aP cos; (17) fields remain finite at r a. This assumption will have to r n n sh n i!0r n0 be slightly modified below to handle subtleties associated X1 with the n 0 harmonic. In the interior of the shell where int k0 0 vr Cnjnk0rPncos; (18) r

k j0 k bj k b a ksh j k bj0 k b a An 0 n 0 n sh rb n 0 n sh

: (21) 10 ksh 1 0 Kn k hn k bj k b a hn k bj k b a 0 0 n sh rb 0 n sh

The An can be made identically zero if two conditions are fields in the shell and interior regions. From the r b met, namely, boundary conditions we have Bn Kn, and thus continuity of p and vr at the r a interface give, with r ! a and k b k b a; (22) 0 sh using (24),

k bk : (23) 0 r sh Knjnkshr a Cnjnk0r; (27) Physically, (22) says that the number of wavelengths in the shell over a distance b a must be the number of wave- 6 lengths in the background medium over a distance b. This wavelength compression is exactly what is produced by 1 coordinate transformation cloaking [1]. Equation (23) sim- 4 ply says that the wave impedances must be appropriately matched at the outer edge of the shell to eliminate reflec- 2 tions. When combined with (6), these expressions deter- mine the two unknown constants in the specification of the 1 0 0 acoustic cloaking shell, namely, k1 b b a and 1 ksh bb a k0. A complete material shell specifica- tion that renders the interior acoustically invisible is thus −2 b a distance (wavelengths) ; (24) b −4 −1 b a r2

r ; (25) −6 b r a2 −6 −4 −2 0 2 4 6 distance (wavelengths) b a3 r2

: (26) b3 r a2 FIG. 2 ( online). The real part of the pressure field in the r plane of the problem domain computed from the series We must now ensure that this solution yields meaningful solution. The plane wave is incident from the left. 024301-3 PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS week ending PRL 100, 024301 (2008) 18 JANUARY 2008

2 2 b r a 0 0 been made in theoretical and experimental acoustic meta-

K j k r a C j k r: (28) b a2r2 n n sh n n 0 materials [14,15]. Specifically, Milton et al. [5] describe conceptually how anisotropic effective mass can be 2 Because of the r a term from r, the left hand side of achieved with spring loaded masses, and Torrent and (28) is zero for all n, giving Cn 0 and thus zero internal Sanchez-Dehesa [10] have shown how effective density fields from the continuity of vr. Physically, this is because and bulk modulus can be controlled in an acoustic meta- the radial mass density tends to infinity at the inner edge of material by embedding inclusions in a fluid matrix. the shell which reduces all radial particle motion to zero. There is thus some hope that such an acoustic cloak could Equation (26) is consistent with this solution except for the be physically realized. Because the strong limits on wave n 0 term for which j00 does not vanish. However, it velocity and thus causal relations for electro- can be shown that C0 does vanish in the limit of the ideal magnetic materials do not apply to acoustic materials, acoustic cloaking parameters by following an argument certain properties, such as a wide bandwidth, may be easier employed by Ruan et al. [12] in analyzing the 2D electro- to realize in practice for an acoustic cloak. The existence of magnetic cloak. We only need to modify the expressions this 3D cloaking shell indicates that related reflectionless for the n 0 fields (remember that scattering vanishes for solutions may also exist for other wave systems that are not all higher order harmonics without any tricks) in the cloak- isomorphic with electromagnetics. ing shell by including the Hankel function solution that Note added.—Chen and Chan [16] recently reported the was removed on account of its singularity at the origin. By same material specifications for a 3D spherical acoustic including this term, it is straightforward to show that C0 cloaking shell through a different approach that relies on tends to zero as the shell approaches the ideal cloak. the isomorphism between the acoustic equations and the Figure 2 shows the real part of the pressure field for the electric conductivity equation. incident plane wave in the entire domain of Fig. 1 com- puted from the series solution. The real part is plotted so that the individual fronts are visible. As for the 2D [13] and 3D [7] electromagnetic solutions, the cloaking *To whom correspondence should be addressed. shell smoothly bends the phase fronts around the interior [email protected] with no scattering in any direction, including the forward [1] J. B. Pendry, D. Schurig, and D. R. Smith, Science 312, direction. 1780 (2006). Thus the material specifications in (24)–(26) are analyti- [2] D. Schurig, J. B. Pendry, and D. R. Smith, Opt. Express 14, cally an ideal 3D acoustic cloak that excludes all incident 9794 (2006). fields from the interior of the shell and does not scatter in [3] D. A. B. Miller, Opt. Express 14, 12457 (2006). any direction. We note that, because the same limiting [4] U. Leonhardt, Science 312, 1777 (2006). argument employed in [12] is needed here, the n 0 [5] G. W. Milton, M. Briane, and J. R. Willis, New J. Phys. 8, scattered fields may decrease slowly as the ideal cloak 248 (2006). [6] S. A. Cummer and D. Schurig, New J. Phys. 9, 45 (2007). parameters are approached. It is also interesting to note [7] H. Chen, B.-I. Wu, B. Zhang, and J. A. Kong, Phys. Rev. that the ideal 3D acoustic cloaking parameters (24)–(26) Lett. 99, 063903 (2007). are similar in structure to the 2D electromagnetic and 2D [8] J. R. Willis, Int. J. Struct. 21, 805 (1985). acoustic [6] parameters in that they contain singularities at [9] Z. Liu, C. T. Chan, and P. Sheng, Phys. Rev. B 71, 014103 the interior edge of the cloak. This is in contrast to the 3D (2005). electromagnetic cloak [1], which does not contain singu- [10] D. Torrent and J. Sanchez-Dehesa, New J. Phys. 9, 323 larities and for which scattering analysis does not require (2007). limiting arguments to show that the scattering is identically [11] J. A. Stratton, Electromagnetic Theory (McGraw-Hill, zero [7]. This is because the 2D electromagnetic, 2D New York, 1941). acoustic, and 3D acoustic cases directly involve solutions [12] Z. Ruan, M. Yan, C. W. Neff, and M. Qiu, Phys. Rev. Lett. of the Helmholtz equation and therefore Bessel functions 99, 113903 (2007). [13] S. A. Cummer, B.-I. Popa, D. Schurig, D. R. Smith, and and spherical Bessel functions that do not all go to zero at J. Pendry, Phys. Rev. E 74, 036621 (2006). the origin. The 3D electromagnetic case involves Riccati- [14] J. Li and C. T. Chan, Phys. Rev. E 70, 055602 (2004). Bessel functions that do all go to zero at the origin. [15] N. Fang, D. Xi, J. Xu, M. Ambati, W. Srituravanich, Physical realization of the mass anisotropy needed for C. Sun, and X. Zhang, Nat. Mater. 5, 452 (2006). such an acoustic cloak will require some type of engi- [16] H. Chen and C. T. Chan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 183518 neered material. We note that significant progress has (2007).

024301-4