<<

Guidance for the Clinician in Rendering Pediatric Care

CLINICAL REPORT Surfactant Replacement Therapy for Preterm and Term Neonates With Respiratory Distress

Richard A. Polin, MD, FAAP, Waldemar A. Carlo, MD, FAAP, abstract and COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN Respiratory failure secondary to surfactant deficiency is a major cause KEY WORDS surfactant, antenatal steroids, respiratory distress syndrome, of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Surfactant therapy sub- meconium aspiration syndrome, neonatal pneumonia, neonatal stantially reduces mortality and respiratory morbidity for this popu- sepsis, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, pulmonary hemorrhage, lation. Secondary surfactant deficiency also contributes to acute persistent pulmonary hypertension, preterm, term respiratory morbidity in late-preterm and term neonates with meco- ABBREVIATIONS nium aspiration syndrome, pneumonia/sepsis, and perhaps pulmonary BPD—bronchopulmonary dysplasia hemorrhage; surfactant replacement may be beneficial for these in- CI—confidence interval CPAP—continuous positive airway fants. This statement summarizes the evidence regarding indications, ECMO—extracorporeal membrane oxygenation administration, formulations, and outcomes for surfactant-replacement INSURE—intubation, surfactant administration, and extubation therapy. The clinical strategy of intubation, surfactant administra- LOE—level of evidence — fi tion, and extubation to continuous positive airway pressure and NNTB number needed to bene t RDS—respiratory distress syndrome the effect of continuous positive airway pressure on outcomes RR—relative risk and surfactant use in preterm infants are also reviewed. Pediatrics SP-B—surfactant protein B 2014;133:156–163 This document is copyrighted and is property of the American Academy of Pediatrics and its Board of Directors. All authors have filed conflict of interest statements with the American Academy of Pediatrics. Any conflicts have been resolved through INTRODUCTION a process approved by the Board of Directors. The American Academy of Pediatrics has neither solicited nor accepted any Surfactant replacement was established as an effective and safe commercial involvement in the development of the content of therapy for immaturity-related surfactant deficiency by the early this publication. 1990s.1 Systematic reviews of randomized, controlled trials confirmed The guidance in this report does not indicate an exclusive that surfactant administration in preterm infants with established course of treatment or serve as a standard of medical care. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) reduces mortality, decreases the appropriate. incidence of pulmonary air leak (pneumothoraces and pulmonary interstitial emphysema), and lowers the risk of chronic disease or death at 28 days of age (Table 1).2–11 Subsequent trials indicated that prophylactic or early administration of surfactant resulted in fewer pneumothoraces, less pulmonary interstitial emphysema, and improved survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). How- ever, recent randomized clinical trials indicate that the benefits of prophylactic surfactant are no longer evident in groups of infants when continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is used routinely.5 This clinical report updates a 2008 report from the American Academy of www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2013-3443 Pediatrics.1 As in the previous report, a number of clinically important doi:10.1542/peds.2013-3443 topics are reviewed surrounding use of surfactant, including pro- All clinical reports from the American Academy of Pediatrics phylactic versus rescue replacement, preparations and administration automatically expire 5 years after publication unless reaffirmed, techniques, the synergistic effects of surfactant and antenatal steroids, revised, or retired at or before that time. and surfactant therapy for respiratory disorders other than RDS. In PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005; Online, 1098-4275). addition, the effect of CPAP on RDS and surfactant replacement and the Copyright © 2014 by the American Academy of Pediatrics

156 FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on September 29, 2021 FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS

TABLE 1 Meta-analyses of Surfactant Replacement: Prophylaxis and Rescue Treatment With prophylactic surfactant versus rescue 2,3,8,11 Animal-Derived and Synthetic Surfactant surfactant.14 However, when the studies Outcome Prophylactic Surfactant Rescue Surfactant that allowed for routine application of Animal Derived Synthetic Animal Derived Synthetic CPAP were included in the meta-analysis N RR (95% CI) N RR (95% CI) N RR (95% CI) N RR (95% CI) (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development SUPPORT Trial and Neonatal mortality 8 0.60 (0.47–0.77) 7 0.70 (0.58–0.85) 10 0.68 (0.57–0.82) 6 0.73 (0.61–0.88) Pneumothorax 9 0.40 (0.29–0.54) 6 0.67 (0.50–0.90) 12 0.42 (0.34–0.52) 5 0.64 (0.55–0.76) Vermont Oxford Network Delivery Room PIE 6 0.46 (0.36–0.59) 2 0.68 (0.50–0.93) 8 0.45 (0.37–0.55) 4 0.62 (0.54–0.71) Management Trial), the benefits of pro- a BPD 8 0.91 (0.79–1.05) 4 1.06 (0.83–1.36) 12 0.95 (0.84–1.08) 5 0.75 (0.61–0.92) phylactic surfactant on mortality (RR BPD/deatha 8 0.80 (0.72–0.88) 4 0.89 (0.77–1.03) 12 0.83 (0.77–0.90) 4 0.73 (0.65–0.83) 0.89; 95% CI 0.76–1.04) and air leak (RR N, number; PIE, pulmonary interstitial emphysema. a Defined at 28 d. 0.86; 95% CI 0.71–1.04) could no longer be demonstrated.5 Furthermore, infants receiving prophylactic surfactant had efficacy of the INSURE approach (intuba- born at less than 27 weeks’ gestation, tion, surfactant administration, and ex- may be increased with surfactant a higher incidence of BPD or death than tubation to CPAP) are reviewed. therapy. Surfactant replacement is did infants stabilized on CPAP (RR 1.12; 95% CI 1.02–1.24). Secondary analyses effective for larger and more mature of studies that did or did not use CPAP PRETERM INFANTS AND preterm infants with established RDS. SURFACTANT EFFECTIVENESS IN to stabilize infants demonstrated a trend to a lower risk of intraventricular CLINICAL TRIALS PROPHYLACTIC VERSUS RESCUE – SURFACTANT hemorrhage (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.82 1.00) Surfactant trials have included infants and severe intraventricular hemorrhage born between 23 and 34 weeks’ ges- A prophylactic, or preventive, surfactant (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.70–1.04) with pro- tation and/or with birth be- strategy is defined as intubation and phylactic surfactant. That finding cannot tween 500 and 2000 g.1–12 The results surfactant administration to infants at be explained; however, there was con- of subgroup analyses from such stud- high risk of developing RDS for the siderable heterogeneity in the trials in- ies indicated that surfactant therapy primary purpose of preventing wors- cluded in the meta-analysis. The risks of decreased mortality rates most effec- ening RDS rather than treatment of developing other complications of pre- tively in infants born at less than 30 established RDS; this has been oper- maturity, such as retinopathy of pre- weeks’ gestation or with birth weight ationalized in clinical studies as sur- maturity, patent ductus arteriosus, and <1250 g.12 In addition, surfactant re- factant administration in the delivery periventricular leukomalacia, were not placement reduced the incidence of room before initial resuscitation efforts significantly different. pneumothorax, pulmonary interstitial or the onset of respiratory distress or, When studies investigating infants born emphysema, and the combined out- most commonly, after initial re- at <30 weeks’ gestation were analyzed come of death or BPD, compared with suscitation but within 10 to 30 minutes separately,5 similar findings were no surfactant replacement12;these after birth. This contrasts with a rescue noted. However, there was a trend for findings suggest that lung injury is or treatment surfactant strategy, in an increased risk of chronic lung dis- mitigated after surfactant replace- which surfactant is given only to pre- ease in infants born at <30 weeks’ ment. The incidence of other medical term infants with established RDS. gestation who received prophylactic morbidities, such as BPD, intraven- Rescue surfactant is most often ad- surfactant (RR 1.13; 95% CI 1.00–1.28) tricular hemorrhage, necrotizing en- ministered within the first 12 hours and a significant increase in death or terocolitis, health care–associated after birth, when specified threshold chronic lung disease (RR 1.13; 95% CI infections, retinopathy of prematurity, 1.02–1.25) with use of prophylactic and patent ductus arteriosus, has not criteria of severity of RDS are met. surfactant. changed with surfactant replacement, The meta-analysis of studies conducted but this may be attributable, in part, before routine application of CPAP EARLY VERSUS DELAYED to the large reduction in mortality demonstrated a lower mortality rate SELECTIVE SURFACTANT with surfactant replacement ther- (relative risk [RR] 0.69; 95% confidence TREATMENT OF RDS apy.13 The onset of clinical signs of interval [CI] 0.56–0.85; number needed patent ductus arteriosus may occur to benefit [NNTB] 20) and a decrease in Although there are no statistically earlier, and the incidence of pulmo- the risk of air leak (RR 0.79; 95% CI significant benefits to prophylactic use nary hemorrhage, especially in infants 0.63–0.98) in preterm infants receiving of surfactant when compared with

PEDIATRICS Volume 133, Number 1, January 2014 157 Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on September 29, 2021 prophylactic CPAP, several studies have CPAP without surfactant.15 When com- of surfactant protein B (SP-B). SP-B investigated whether administration of pared with the group of infants re- enhances the rate of of surfactant early in the course of re- ceiving prophylactic surfactant and at the air-water inter- spiratory insufficiency improves clini- continued ventilation, the RR of death face, is involved in the formation of tu- cal outcomes. Early rescue is defined or BPD was 0.78 (95% CI 0.59–1.03) for bular myelin, and has antiinflammatory as surfactant treatment within 1 to 2 the INSURE group and 0.83 (95% CI properties. However, it is unclear hours of birth, and late rescue is de- 0.64–1.09) for the CPAP group. How- whether significant differences in fined as surfactant treatment 2 or ever, in the nasal CPAP group, 48% clinical outcomes exist among the more hours after birth. A recent meta- were managed without intubation and available animal-derived products. analysis of early (within 2 hours) 54% without surfactant treatment. A A synthetic surfactant (lucinactant) that versus delayed surfactant treatment recent meta-analysis demonstrated contains a 21-amino acid peptide that concluded that the risks of mortality that prophylactic surfactant (with mimics SP-B activity has recently been (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.74–0.95), air leak rapid extubation to CPAP) was associ- approved for the prevention and (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.48–0.78), chronic ated with a higher risk of death or BPD treatment of RDS in preterm infants.18,19 lung disease (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.55– (RR 1.12; 95% CI 1.02–1.24; number When compared with animal-derived 0.86), and chronic lung disease or needed to harm of 17) when compared surfactant (beractant or poractant), death (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.75–0.91) were with early stabilization with CPAP and lucinactant was shown to be equiva- significantly decreased. There were no selective surfactant administration.5 In lent.18,19 Neonatal morbidities (intra- differences in other complications of infants with birth weight ≥1250 g and ventricular hemorrhage, periventricular prematurity.7 mild to moderate RDS, elective intuba- leukomalacia, pulmonary hemorrhage, tion and administration of surfactant sepsis, patent ductus arteriosus, ret- EARLY ADMINISTRATION OF decreased the need for mechanical ven- inopathy of prematurity, necrotizing SURFACTANT FOLLOWED BY BRIEF tilation but had no effect on the du- enterocolitis, and BPD) were not sig- VENTILATION AND EXTUBATION TO ration of therapy, ventilator nificantly different between preterm CPAP (INSURE STRATEGY) therapy, or hospital stay.16 infants treated with animal-derived The INSURE strategy is widely used surfactants and those treated with ANIMAL-DERIVED VERSUS throughout the world. In randomized synthetic surfactants. SYNTHETIC SURFACTANT clinical trials performed before 2008, SURFACTANT ADMINISTRATION the INSURE approach, compared with A wide variety of animal-derived and rescue surfactant administration in synthetic surfactants are available Surfactant administration strategies infants with RDS, was associated with commercially (Table 2); both are ben- have been based on manufacturer asignificantly reduced need for me- eficial as therapy for RDS in preterm guidelines for individual surfactants.1 chanical ventilation (RR 0.67; 95% CI infants. Animal-derived surfactants The dose of surfactant, frequency of 0.57–0.79) and a reduced need for ox- are modified or purified from bovine administration, and treatment proce- ygen at 28 days.6 In an analysis strati- or porcine . Treatment with dures have been modeled after re- fied by fraction of inspired oxygen animal-derived surfactants (beractant search protocols. Furthermore, repeated requirement at study entry, a signifi- [Survanta; Abbvie Inc, North Chicago, doses of surfactants given at intervals cantly higher frequency of patent duc- IL], calfactant [Infasurf; ONY Inc, for predetermined indications have tus arteriosus was observed among Amherst, NY], and poractant [Curosurf; decreased mortality and morbidity infants in the rescue surfactant group, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Parma, Italy]) has compared with placebo or single who required a fraction of inspired several advantages over first-generation, surfactant doses.10 However, given the oxygen greater than 0.45 (RR 2.15; 95% protein-free synthetic surfactants long half-life for surfactant in preterm CI 1.09–4.23). The Vermont Oxford Net- (eg, colfosceril palmitate [Exosurf; infants with RDS,20 redosing should work Delivery Room Management Trial GlaxoSmithKline, Middlesex, UK]).3 not be needed more often than every (n = 648) randomly assigned infants These include lower mortality rates 12 hours, unless surfactant is being born at 26 to 29 weeks’ gestation to 1 (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.76–0.98; number inactivated by an infectious process, of 3 treatment groups: prophylactic needed to harm of 40) and fewer meconium, or blood. Dosing intervals surfactant and continued ventilation, pneumothoraces (RR 0.63; 95% CI shorter than 12 hours recommended prophylactic surfactant and rapid ex- 0.53–0.75; NNTB 22).4 Animal-derived by some manufacturers are not based tubation to CPAP (INSURE), or nasal surfactants contain variable amounts on human pharmacokinetic data.

158 FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on September 29, 2021 FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS

TABLE 2 Composition and Dosage of Surfactants17 Surfactant Main Proteins Suggested Phospholipid per Phospholipids Dose Dose Animal-derived Beractant (Survantaa) minced bovine lung DPPC and PG (<0.1%) SP-B and (1%) 25 mg/mL 4 mL/kg 100 mg/kg extract SP-C Calfactant (Infasurfb) bovine calf lung lavage DPPC and PG (0.7%) SP-B and (1%) SP-C 35 mg/mL 3 mL/kg 105 mg/kg Poractant (Curosurfc) minced porcine lung DPPC and PG (0.6%)SP-B and (1%) SP-C 80 mg/mL 2.5 mL/kg and 100-200 mg/kg extract 1.25 mL/kg 100 mg/kg Synthetic Colfosceril (Exosurfd) DPPC (100%) None 13.5 mg/mL 5 mL/kg 67.5 mg/kg Synthetic, protein analog Lucinactant (Surfaxine) DPPC and POPG KL4 peptide as SP-B 30 mg/mL 5.8 mL/kg 175 mg/kg DPPC, dipalmitoyl ; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; POPG, palmitoyloleyl phosphatidylglycerol; SP-C, surfactant protein C. a Abbvie Inc, North Chicago, IL. b ONY Inc, Amherst, NY. c Chiesi Farmaceutici, Parma, Italy. d GlaxoSmithKline, Middlesex, UK. e Discovery Laboratories, Warrington, PA.

Surfactant administration procedures endotracheal tube occurred more of- All infants were maintained on CPAP. may be complicated by transient air- ten when the infusion technique was The administration of surfactant way obstruction, oxygen desaturation, used. Similar clinical outcomes were through a thin plastic catheter sig- bradycardia, and alterations in cere- also found when surfactant was ad- nificantly reduced the need for me- bral blood flow and brain electrical ministered as a bolus or as a 1-minute chanical ventilation and decreased activity. The delivery of surfactant can infusion through a side-hole adapter.24 the need for at 28 also result in rapid improvement in Because data are conflicting and lim- days. More data are needed to rec- lung volume, functional residual ca- ited, the optimal method of surfactant ommend any of the alternative tech- pacity, and compliance. Thus, expedi- administration in preterm infants has niques for surfactant administration. tious changes in mechanical ventilator yet to be clearly proven. Additionally, settings may be necessary to minimize there is insufficient evidence to rec- SURFACTANT REPLACEMENT the risks of lung injury and air leak. ommend the optimal number of frac- THERAPY FOR RESPIRATORY Clinicians with expertise in these tional doses of surfactant or what DISORDERS OTHER THAN RDS procedures should be responsible for body position is best when surfactant surfactant administration whenever is administered. Surfactant inactivation and secondary dysfunction may occur with conditions surfactant is given. A number of alternatives to intratracheal such as meconium aspiration syndrome, Surfactant has traditionally been ad- administration of surfactant have been persistent pulmonary hypertension of ministered through an endotracheal evaluated in clinical trials.25–32 These the newborn, neonatal pneumonia, and tube either as bolus, in smaller aliquots,21 include use of aerosolized surfactant pulmonary hemorrhage.33,34 Surfactant or by infusion through an adaptor preparations, laryngeal mask airway- administration techniques, surfactant port on the proximal end of the en- aided delivery of surfactant, instillation dosage, patient populations, entry cri- dotracheal tube.19 In an animal model, of pharyngeal surfactant, and adminis- teria, and study outcomes in the small administration of surfactant as an in- tration of surfactant using thin intra- tratracheal bolus while disconnected tracheal catheters. Theoretically, each randomized trials and case series of from the mechanical ventilator re- of these methods could allow adminis- surfactant replacement in neonates fi sulted in more uniform distribution tration of surfactant without intubation with secondary surfactant de ciency 35–42 than an infusion administered over 30 in spontaneously infants. In vary considerably. minutes through a side-hole adapter.22 a recent study, Göpel et al25 randomized Meconium aspiration syndrome with However, a small clinical trial of human 220 preterm infants born at 26 to 28 severe respiratory failure and persis- preterm infants showed no signifi- weeks’ gestation to receive either sur- tent pulmonary hypertension may be cant differences in clinical outcomes factant administered via a thin plastic complicated by surfactant inactivation. between methods.23 During surfac- catheter (using laryngoscopy) or surfac- Surfactant replacement by bolus or tant administration, reflux into the tant administered as a rescue therapy. slow infusion in infants with severe

PEDIATRICS Volume 133, Number 1, January 2014 159 Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on September 29, 2021 meconium aspiration syndrome im- outcomes. In fact, the need for ECMO, exposed to antenatal steroids at 23 to proved oxygenation and reduced the the incidence of chronic lung disease, 25 weeks’ gestation.49 Infants born be- need for extracorporeal membrane and mortality rate were increased fore 32 weeks’ gestation who received oxygenation (ECMO) (RR 0.64; 95% CI with surfactant administration.41,42 both antenatal steroids and postnatal 0.46–0.91; NNTB 6).35 Surfactant did not surfactantwerefoundonsubgroup reduce mortality or decrease the fre- ANTENATAL STEROIDS AND analyses to have significant reductions quency of air leaks (pneumothoraces SURFACTANT REPLACEMENT in mortality, severity of respiratory dis- or pulmonary interstitial emphysema). tress, and air leaks when compared Surfactant trials that proved efficacy In a blinded randomized clinical trial of with subgroups that received neither were performed at a time when an- infants receiving ECMO, administration steroids nor surfactant, antenatal ste- tenatal steroid therapy was given in- of surfactant shortened the duration of roids only, or surfactant only.50–52 This frequently.43 By the late 1990s, most the ECMO. Notably, there were no finding corroborates evidence from an- mothers of preterm infants born at infants with congenital diaphragmatic imal models of RDS that the combina- less than 30 weeks’ gestation had re- hernia in that study.36 tion of antenatal steroids and postnatal ceived antenatal steroids (58% to surfactant improves lung function more Surfactant inactivation may be asso- 92%).44–46 Antenatal steroids signifi- than either treatment alone.53–55 ciated with pneumonia.37,38 In a small cantly reduce mortality (RR 0.62; 95% fi randomized trial of surfactant rescue CI 0.51–0.77; NNTB 23), RDS (RR 0.65; An important additional bene tofan- therapy, the subgroup of infants with 95% CI 0.47–0.75; NNTB 12), and sur- tenatal steroids is a reduction in risk sepsis showed improved oxygenation factant use in preterm infants (RR of intraventricular hemorrhage, an and a reduced need for ECMO com- 0.45; 95% CI 0.22–0.93; NNTB 9),47 most advantage not found with surfactant 56 pared with a similar group of control consistently in those born between 28 replacement alone. The effects of infants.37 Newborn infants with pneu- and 34 weeks’ gestation. antenatal steroids on other neonatal morbidities, such as necrotizing en- monia or sepsis receiving rescue surfac- Results of observational studies and terocolitis and patent ductus arterio- tant also demonstrated improved gas clinical trials have inferred that ante- sus, have been inconsistent. However, exchange compared with infants natal steroids may reduce the need for antenatal steroids have not signifi- without surfactant treatment. The prophylactic and early rescue surfac- cantly decreased the incidence of number of neonates who received tant replacement in infants born after BPD.50,51 surfactant for sepsis and pneumonia 27 to 28 weeks’ gestation,16,48 but no in these clinical reports is small, and randomized, controlled trials have CPAP AND SURFACTANT no recommendation can be made. addressed this issue. In infants born at Surfactant treatment of pulmonary or earlier than 27 weeks’ gestation, the Randomized clinical trials suggest that hemorrhage is plausible, because blood incidence of RDS is not reduced after nasal CPAP is acceptable as an alter- inhibits surfactant function. However, exposure to antenatal steroids; how- native to surfactant administration in only a few retrospective and observa- ever, in a recently published study, preterm infants with RDS. A clinical tional reports have documented the death or neurodevelopment impair- report from the American Academy of benefits of such therapy, and the mag- ment at 18 to 22 months was signifi- Pediatrics, “Respiratory Support of nitude of benefit remains to be estab- cantly lower for infants who had been the Preterm Infant,” is forthcoming.57 lished.39 Congenital diaphragmatic hernia may be associated with surfactant in- TABLE 3 Levels of Evidence59 sufficiency.40 Although measurements Recommendation LOE LOE Grade of Recommendation of disaturated phosphatidylcholine Preterm infants born at <30 wk of gestation who need 1 Strong Recommendation from lungs of infants with congenital mechanical ventilation because of severe RDS should be diaphragmatic hernia show synthetic given surfactant after initial stabilization. Using CPAP immediately after birth with subsequent selective 1 Strong Recommendation rates similar to those from infants surfactant administration should be considered as an without diaphragmatic hernia, pool alternative to routine intubation with prophylactic or early sizes and kinetics are altered.40 How- surfactant administration in preterm infants. Rescue surfactant may be considered for infants with hypoxic 2 Recommendation ever, surfactant treatment of a large respiratory failure attributable to secondary surfactant series of infants with congenital di- deficiency (eg, meconium aspiration syndrome or sepsis/ aphragmatic hernia did not improve pneumonia).

160 FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on September 29, 2021 FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS

SUMMARY OF SCIENCE hernia does not improve clinical or uncomfortable with surfactant outcomes (LOE 2). 1. Surfactant replacement, given as administration or managing an in- prophylaxis or rescue treatment, 8. Antenatal steroids and postnatal fant who has received surfactant reduces the incidence of RDS, air surfactant replacement indepen- should wait for the transport team leaks, and mortality in preterm dently and additively reduce mor- to arrive. infants with RDS (level of evidence tality, the severity of RDS, and air leaks in preterm infants (LOE 2). LEAD AUTHORS [LOE] 1). Richard A. Polin, MD, FAAP 2. Both animal-derived and newer CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS (TABLE 3) Waldemar A. Carlo, MD, FAAP synthetic surfactants with SP-B– like activity decrease acute respi- 1. Preterm infants born at <30 weeks’ COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN, 2012–2013 ratory morbidity and mortality in gestation who need mechanical ven- tilation because of severe RDS should Lu-Ann Papile, MD, FAAP, Chairperson preterm infants with RDS (LOE 1). Richard A. Polin, MD, FAAP be given surfactant after initial stabi- 3. Early rescue surfactant treatment Waldemar A. Carlo, MD, FAAP < lization (Strong Recommendation). Rosemarie Tan, MD, FAAP ( 2 hours of age) in infants with Praveen Kumar, MD, FAAP RDS decreases the risk of mortal- 2. Using CPAP immediately after birth William Benitz, MD, FAAP ity, air leak, and chronic lung dis- with subsequent selective surfactant Eric Eichenwald, MD, FAAP ease in preterm infants (LOE 1). administration should be considered James Cummings, MD, FAAP as an alternative to routine intuba- Jill Baley, MD, FAAP 4. Early initiation of CPAP with subse- tion with prophylactic or early sur- quent selective surfactant adminis- CONSULTANT factant administration in preterm tration in extremely preterm infants Roger F. Soll, MD, FAAP infants (Strong Recommendation). results in lower rates of BPD/death 3. Rescue surfactant may be consid- LIAISONS when compared with treatment – ered for infants with hypoxic respira- Tonse N. K. Raju, MD, FAAP National Institutes with prophylactic surfactant ther- of Health tory failure attributable to secondary apy (LOE 1). CAPT Wanda Denise Barfield, MD, FAAP – Centers surfactant deficiency (eg, pulmonary for Disease Control and Prevention 5. Surfactant replacement has not hemorrhage, meconium aspiration Erin Keels, MSN – National Association of been shown to affect the incidence syndrome, or sepsis/pneumonia) Neonatal Nurses of neurologic, developmental, be- Anne Jefferies, MD – Canadian Pediatric Society (Recommendation). Kasper S. Wang, MD, FAAP – AAP Section on havioral, medical, or educational 4. Preterm and term neonates who Surgery outcomes in preterm infants (LOE 2). George Macones, MD – American College of are receiving surfactant should Obstetricians and Gynecologists 6. Surfactant treatment improves oxy- be managed by nursery and trans- genation and reduces the need for port personnel with the technical STAFF ECMO without an increase in mor- and clinical expertise to administer Jim Couto, MA bidity in neonates with meconium surfactant safely and deal with DISCLOSURES aspiration syndrome (LOE 2). multisystem illness. Therefore, pedi- Dr Carlo is on the Mednax Board of Directors. 7. Surfactant treatment of infants atric providers who are without ex- Dr Polin is a consultant for Discovery Labora- with congenital diaphragmatic pertise, or who are inexperienced tories.

REFERENCES

1. Engle WA; American Academy of Pediatrics 3. Seger N, Soll R. Animal derived surfactant 5. Rojas-Reyes MX, Morley CJ, Soll R. Pro- Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Surfactant- extract for treatment of respiratory dis- phylactic versus selective use of surfactant replacement therapy for respiratory dis- tress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst in preventing morbidity and mortality in tress in the preterm and term neonate. Rev. 2009; (2):CD007836 preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Pediatrics. 2008;121(2):419–432 4. Soll RF, Blanco F. Natural surfactant extract Rev. 2012;3(3):CD000510 2. Soll RF. Synthetic surfactant for respiratory versus synthetic surfactant for neonatal 6. Stevens TP, Harrington EW, Blennow M, Soll distress syndrome in preterm infants. Cochrane respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane RF. Early surfactant administration with Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD001149 Database Syst Rev. 2001;(2):CD000144 brief ventilation vs. selective surfactant

PEDIATRICS Volume 133, Number 1, January 2014 161 Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on September 29, 2021 and continued mechanical ventilation for risk for respiratory distress syndrome. vention of morbidity and mortality in pre- preterm infants with or at risk for re- Pediatrics. 2005;115(4):1030–1038 term infants with or at risk of respiratory spiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane 19. Moya F, Sinha S, Gadzinowski J, et al; distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Database Syst Rev. 2007;(4):CD003063 SELECT and STAR Study Investigators. One- Syst Rev. 2011;(7):CD008309 7. Bahadue FL, Soll R. Early versus delayed year follow-up of very preterm infants who 30. Abdel-Latif ME, Osborn DA. Nebulised sur- selective surfactant treatment for neonatal received lucinactant for prevention of re- factant in preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane spiratory distress syndrome: results from respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11(11):CD001456 2 multicenter randomized, controlled trials. Database Syst Rev. 2012;(10):CD008310 8. Soll R, Ozek E. Prophylactic protein free Pediatrics. 2007;119(6). Available at: www. 31. Abdel-Latif ME, Osborn DA. Pharyngeal in- synthetic surfactant for preventing mor- pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/119/6/e1361 stillation of surfactant before the first bidity and mortality in preterm infants. 20. Cogo PE, Facco M, Simonato M, et al. breath for prevention of morbidity and Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(1): Pharmacokinetics and clinical predictors mortality in preterm infants at risk of re- CD001079 of surfactant redosing in respiratory dis- spiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane 9. Pfister RH, Soll R, Wiswell TE. Protein- tress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2011; Database Syst Rev. 2011;(3):CD008311 containing synthetic surfactant versus 37(3):510–517 32. Abdel-Latif ME, Osborn DA, Challis D. Intra- protein-free synthetic surfactant for the 21. Kendig JW, Ryan RM, Sinkin RA, et al. amniotic surfactant for women at risk of prevention and treatment of respiratory Comparison of two strategies for surfac- preterm birth for preventing respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database tant prophylaxis in very premature infants: distress in newborns. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(4):CD006180 a multicenter randomized trial. Pediatrics. Syst Rev. 2010;(1):CD007916 10. Soll R, Ozek E. Multiple versus single doses 1998;101(6):1006–1012 33. Finer NN. Surfactant use for neonatal lung of exogenous surfactant for the prevention 22. Ueda T, Ikegami M, Rider ED, Jobe AH. Dis- injury: beyond respiratory distress syn- or treatment of neonatal respiratory dis- tribution of surfactant and ventilation in drome. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2004;5(suppl tress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst surfactant-treated preterm lambs. J Appl A):S289–S297 Rev. 2009;(1):CD000141 Physiol (1985). 1994;76(1):45–55 34. Donn SM, Dalton J. Surfactant replacement 11. Soll RF. Prophylactic natural surfactant ex- 23. Zola EM, Gunkel JH, Chan RK, et al. Com- therapy in the neonate: beyond respiratory tract for preventing morbidity and mor- parison of three dosing procedures for distress syndrome. Respir Care. 2009;54(9): tality in preterm infants. Cochrane administration of bovine surfactant to 1203–1208 Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000511 neonates with respiratory distress syn- 35. El Shahed AI, Dargaville P, Ohlsson A, Soll 12. Suresh GK, Soll RF. Overview of surfactant drome. J Pediatr. 1993;122(3):453–459 RF. Surfactant for meconium aspiration replacement trials. J Perinatol. 2005;25 24. Valls-i-Soler A, López-Heredia J, Fernández- syndrome in full term/near term infants. (suppl 2):S40–S44 Ruanova MB, Gastiasoro E; Spanish Sur- Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(3): 13. Philip AG. Neonatal mortality rate: is fur- factant Collaborative Group. A simplified CD002054 ther improvement possible? J Pediatr. surfactant dosing procedure in respiratory 36. Lotze A, Knight GR, Martin GR, et al. Im- 1995;126(3):427–433 distress syndrome: the “side-hole” ran- proved pulmonary outcome after exoge- 14. Soll RF, Morley CJ. Prophylactic versus se- domized study. Acta Paediatr. 1997;86(7): nous surfactant therapy for respiratory lective use of surfactant in preventing 747–751 failure in term infants requiring extracor- morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. 25. Göpel W, Kribs A, Ziegler A, et al; German poreal membrane oxygenation. J Pediatr. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(2): Neonatal Network. Avoidance of mechanical 1993;122(2):261–268 CD000510 ventilation by surfactant treatment of 37. Tan K, Lai NM, Sharma A. Surfactant for 15. Dunn MS, Kaempf J, de Klerk A, et al; Ver- spontaneously breathing preterm infants bacterial pneumonia in late preterm and mont Oxford Network DRM Study Group. (AMV): an open-label, randomised, con- term infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Randomized trial comparing 3 approaches trolled trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9803):1627– 2012;(2):CD008155 to the initial respiratory management of 1634 38. Vento GM, Tana M, Tirone C, et al. Effec- preterm neonates. Pediatrics. 2011;128(5). 26. Schmölzer GM, Agarwal M, Kamlin CO, Davis tiveness of treatment with surfactant in Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/con- PG. Supraglottic airway devices during neo- premature infants with respiratory failure tent/full/128/5/e1069 natal resuscitation: an historical perspec- and pulmonary infection. Acta Biomed. 16. Escobedo MB, Gunkel JH, Kennedy KA, et al; tive, systematic review and meta-analysis 2012;83(suppl 1):33–36 Texas Neonatal Research Group. Early sur- of available clinical trials. Resuscitation. 39. Aziz A, Ohlsson A. Surfactant for pulmonary factant for neonates with mild to moderate 2013;84(6):722–730 haemorrhage in neonates. Cochrane Data- respiratory distress syndrome: a multicen- 27. Kribs A. How best to administer surfactant base Syst Rev. 2012;(7):CD005254 ter, randomized trial. J Pediatr. 2004;144(6): to VLBW infants? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neo- 40. Cogo PE, Zimmermann LJ, Meneghini L, 804–808 natal Ed. 2011;96(4):F238–F240 et al. disaturated- 17. Moya F, Javier MC. Myth: all surfactants are 28. Mehler K, Grimme J, Abele J, Huenseler C, phosphatidylcholine (DSPC) turnover and alike. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;16 Roth B, Kribs A. Outcome of extremely low pool size in newborn infants with congen- (5):269–274 gestational age newborns after in- ital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Pediatr 18. Sinha SK, Lacaze-Masmonteil T, Valls i Soler troduction of a revised protocol to assist Res. 2003;54(5):653–658 A, et al; Surfaxin Therapy Against Re- preterm infants in their transition to ex- 41. Van Meurs K; Congenital Diaphragmatic Her- spiratory Distress Syndrome Collaborative trauterine life. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101(12): nia Study Group. Is surfactant therapy bene- Group. A multicenter, randomized, con- 1232–1239 ficial in the treatment of the term newborn trolled trial of lucinactant versus poractant 29. Abdel-Latif ME, Osborn DA. Laryngeal mask infant with congenital diaphragmatic hernia? alfa among very premature infants at high airway surfactant administration for pre- JPediatr. 2004;145(3):312–316

162 FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on September 29, 2021 FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS

42. Lally KP, Lally PA, Langham MR, et al; Con- Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(3): cal trials of surfactant replacement. Am J genital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group. CD004454 Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173(1):286–290 Surfactant does not improve survival rate 48. Gortner L, Wauer RR, Hammer H, et al. Early 53. Seidner S, Pettenazzo A, Ikegami M, Jobe A. in preterm infants with congenital di- versus late surfactant treatment in pre- Corticosteroid potentiation of surfactant aphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 2004; term infants of 27 to 32 weeks’ gestational dose response in preterm rabbits. J Appl 39(6):829–833 age: a multicenter controlled clinical trial. Physiol (1985). 1988;64(6):2366–2371 43. Wright LL, Horbar JD, Gunkel H, et al. Evi- Pediatrics. 1998;102(5):1153–1160 54. Ikegami M, Jobe AH, Seidner S, Yamada T. dence from multicenter networks on the 49. Carlo WA, McDonald SA, Fanaroff AA, et al; Gestational effects of corticosteroids and use and effectiveness of antenatal Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of surfactant in ventilated rabbits. Pediatr corticosteroids in low birth weight infants. Child Health and Human Development – Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173(1):263–269 Neonatal Research Network. Association of Res. 1989;25(1):32 37 44. Chien LY, Ohlsson A, Seshia MM, Boulton J, antenatal corticosteroids with mortality 55. Gladstone IM, Mercurio MR, Devenny SG, Sankaran K, Lee SK; Canadian Neonatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes among Jacobs HC. Antenatal steroids, postnatal Network. Variations in antenatal cortico- infants born at 22 to 25 weeks’ gestation. surfactant, and pulmonary function in steroid therapy: a persistent problem de- JAMA. 2011;306(21):2348–2358 premature rabbits. J Appl Physiol (1985). spite 30 years of evidence. Obstet Gynecol. 50. Jobe AH, Mitchell BR, Gunkel JH. Beneficial 1989;67(4):1377–1382 2002;99(3):401–408 effects of the combined use of prenatal 56. National Institutes of Health. Effect of cor- 45. Horbar JD, Badger GJ, Carpenter JH, et al; corticosteroids and postnatal surfactant ticosteroids for fetal maturation on peri- Members of the Vermont Oxford Network. on preterm infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. natal outcomes. NIH Consens Statement. – Trends in mortality and morbidity for very 1993;168(2):508 513 1994;12(2):1–24 low birth weight infants, 1991-1999. Pedi- 51. Kari MA, Hallman M, Eronen M, et al. Prenatal 57. Carlo W, Polin RA; American Academy of atrics. 2002;110(1 pt 1):143–151 dexamethasone treatment in conjunction Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and New- 46. St John EB, Carlo WA. Respiratory distress with rescue therapy of human surfactant: born. Respiratory support in preterm syndrome in VLBW infants: changes in a randomized placebo-controlled multicen- management and outcomes observed by ter study. Pediatrics. 1994;93(5):730–736 infants at birth. Pediatrics. In press the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. 52. White A, Marcucci G, Andrews E, Edwards K, 58. US Preventive Services Task . Grade Semin Perinatol. 2003;27(4):288–292 Long W; The American Exosurf Neonatal definition recommendations after 2007. 47. Roberts D, Dalziel S. Antenatal cortico- Study Group I and The Canadian Exosurf Available at: www.uspreventiveservices- steroids for accelerating fetal lung matu- Neonatal Study Group. Antenatal steroids taskforce.org/uspstf/grades.htm. Accessed ration for women at risk of preterm birth. and neonatal outcomes in controlled clini- June 7, 2013

PEDIATRICS Volume 133, Number 1, January 2014 163 Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on September 29, 2021 Surfactant Replacement Therapy for Preterm and Term Neonates With Respiratory Distress Richard A. Polin, Waldemar A. Carlo and COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN Pediatrics 2014;133;156 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-3443 originally published online December 30, 2013;

Updated Information & including high resolution figures, can be found at: Services http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/133/1/156 References This article cites 56 articles, 10 of which you can access for free at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/133/1/156#BIBL Subspecialty Collections This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in the following collection(s): Committee on Fetus & Newborn http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/committee_on_fetus_ _newborn Fetus/Newborn Infant http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/fetus:newborn_infant_ sub Neonatology http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/neonatology_sub Pulmonology http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/pulmonology_sub Respiratory Tract http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/respiratory_tract_sub Permissions & Licensing Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or in its entirety can be found online at: http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissions.xhtml Reprints Information about ordering reprints can be found online: http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml

Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on September 29, 2021 Surfactant Replacement Therapy for Preterm and Term Neonates With Respiratory Distress Richard A. Polin, Waldemar A. Carlo and COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN Pediatrics 2014;133;156 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-3443 originally published online December 30, 2013;

The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the World Wide Web at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/133/1/156

Pediatrics is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it has been published continuously since 1948. Pediatrics is owned, published, and trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 345 Park Avenue, Itasca, Illinois, 60143. Copyright © 2014 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 1073-0397.

Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on September 29, 2021