On the Thermodynamic Efficiency of a Multiferroic Thermomagnetic Generator

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

On the Thermodynamic Efficiency of a Multiferroic Thermomagnetic Generator University of California Los Angeles On the thermodynamic efficiency of a multiferroic thermomagnetic generator: From bulk to atomic scale A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering by Samuel Mancilla Sandoval 2014 c Copyright by Samuel Mancilla Sandoval 2014 Abstract of the Dissertation On the thermodynamic efficiency of a multiferroic thermomagnetic generator: From bulk to atomic scale by Samuel Mancilla Sandoval Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering University of California, Los Angeles, 2014 Professor Gregory P. Carman, Chair A unique multiferroic type of thermomagnetic generator is being investigated in order to establish its thermodynamic efficiency at different size scales. This device generates electricity when a magnetic material interacts with a thermal gradient by means of a spring-magnet mechanism. This unique technology is compared to other thermal-electric energy harvesting technologies to show that these devices have a similar goal of achieving a maximum theoretical efficiency of around 50% relative to Carnot. The first approach towards achieving improved performance relies on the analytical modeling, and experimental verification, of several sub- systems stemming from the original design, which include the optimization of the magnetic force component, the optimization of the heat transfer process and the efficiency of the energy conversion process. The method to improve the magnetic force component is not recommended and neither is the method to improve the heat transfer process. Nevertheless, the energy conversion subsystem is success- fully modeled and verified; thereby suggesting that an electromagnetic induction coil may be better suited for the energy conversion process over a ferroelectric transduction mechanism at bulk scale. A cascade design is also investigated as a method to improve device efficiency; though analysis reveals a design flaw, which ii leads to other methods for improving efficiency. Two models of thermomagnetic generator thermodynamic efficiency are devel- oped, which are based on distinct approaches taken by Solomon and Brillouin in order to compare this unique system to a Carnot engine. The model based on a modified form of Solomon's approach results in a relative efficiency of 0.5%, which compares well with an estimate of efficiency based on provided data from the orig- inal design. This representative model of efficiency was then applied to a survey of pure elements for comparison, which confirms gadolinium as the best material for use as a working body with a relative efficiency of around 20% . The model based on Brillouin's approach represents a more rigorous thermodynamic analysis, which qualitatively agrees with the results based on Solomon's approach, though it predicts larger values of efficiency for most of the materials in the survey. The conservative model based on Solomon's approach is then applied to a hypothetical system that uses a single-domain magnetic material as a working body. This effort is pursued since single-domain nanostructures exhibit a remanent magnetization, which is shown to increase magnetic energy density. The resulting analysis pre- dicts efficiencies on the order of 30% relative to Carnot for this nanoscale system, though the effects of size are not considered in this model. A model is developed to correlate the effects of size on thermodynamic effi- ciency for this device. Considering a nanoscaled nickel structure as a working body, this model combines three existing models to predict relative efficiency values that are comparable to the bulk scale, although this system may operate closer to room-temperature. This result is unexpected since the absolute efficiency is shown to increase as a function of decreasing size, though this discrepancy is explained as a consequence of Curie point suppression. The combined model is also applied to a hypothetical composite made of separated layers of nickel with distinct thicknesses. This composite material is predicted to spread the ferro- magnetic transition across a much larger temperature range as compared to bulk iii nickel, such that this material may be better suited for different applications; for example, as a sensor or as a thermal switch. Moreover, this combined model is also shown to be a lower-bound estimate of thermodynamic efficiency, since the actual performance depends on material characterizations that have yet to be determined. The magnetization of ferromagnetic nanostructures as a function of both ap- plied field, and temperature represents a current engineering challenge. This may be due to current manufacturing techniques that produce defects, and may also be due to resolution limitations of commercially available magnetometers. These challenges also affect a proposed hypothesis regarding the existence of a distri- bution of transition temperatures within a single nanostructure. This hypothesis aims to resolve whether the diffuse transition behavior of ferromagnetic nanostruc- tures is due to volume-averaged magnetometer measurement techniques, and/or due to surface effects from defects resulting from imperfect manufacturing tech- niques. These issues would need to be resolved before considering a nanoscale design, which may potentially be useful as a secondary energy recycling device in thermally-assisted magnetic recording applications. Nevertheless, a proof-of- concept experimental setup is offered that may be useful for future designs at the smallest relevant scales. iv The dissertation of Samuel Mancilla Sandoval is approved. Chistopher S. Lynch Adrienne S. Lavine Bruce S. Dunn Gregory P. Carman, Committee Chair University of California, Los Angeles 2014 v Dedico esta tesis a mis maravillosos padres Marcia y Narciso, mi bella esposa Dayna y nuestra querida Foxy, mis incre´ıbleshermanos Sandra, Monica y Ernesto, y a todos mis amigos. vi Table of Contents 1 Introduction :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 1 2 Thermal-Electric Energy Harvesting Review ::::::::::: 6 2.1 Introduction . .6 2.2 Thermoelectrics based on the Seebeck effect . .7 2.3 Thermomagnetic Generators . 10 2.3.1 Ferromagnetic Phase Transition . 12 2.3.2 Energy Harvesting based on Electromagnetic Induction . 19 2.3.3 Energy Harvesting based on Multiferroics . 20 2.4 Pyroelectric Generators . 22 2.5 Summary . 23 3 Experimental Approach to Improve Performance :::::::: 24 3.1 Introduction . 24 3.2 Magnetic Energy . 25 3.3 Heat Transfer . 29 3.4 Harvest by Electromagnetic Induction . 33 3.4.1 Analytical Modeling . 34 3.4.2 Experimental Test Setup & Results . 37 3.4.3 Other Considerations . 42 3.5 Summary . 45 4 Thermodynamic Efficiency Analysis of a Multiferroic Thermo- magnetic Generator ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 46 vii 4.1 Introduction . 46 4.2 Solomon Efficiency . 47 4.2.1 Process 1 − 2: Heat rejection at constant field . 50 4.2.2 Process 2 − 3: Applied field at constant temperature . 51 4.2.3 Process 3 − 4: Heat input at constant field . 53 4.2.4 Process 4 − 1: Spring restoration at constant temperature 53 4.2.5 Cycle Analysis . 54 4.3 Brillouin efficiency . 59 4.4 Magnetic Single Domain Considerations . 63 4.5 Summary . 66 4.6 Appendix . 67 5 Size Effects on Efficiency :::::::::::::::::::::::: 75 5.1 Introduction . 75 5.2 Background . 76 5.2.1 Model 1 - Thermodynamic Efficiency . 76 5.2.2 Model 2 - Ferromagnetic Transition . 77 5.2.3 Model 3 - BOLS Correlation . 80 5.3 Combined Model . 85 5.4 Results & Discussion . 87 5.5 Summary . 93 6 Other Considerations :::::::::::::::::::::::::: 94 6.1 Introduction . 94 6.2 Transition Temperature Distribution . 94 viii 6.3 Design of a NanoMTMG . 100 6.4 Summary . 102 7 Conclusion ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 103 References ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 106 ix List of Figures 1.1 Multiferroic thermomagnetic generator (MTMG) with restoring spring mechanism (Images borrowed from Ujihara et al., 2007 [UCL07]); (a) Actual device, (b) cross-section during cooling, (c) cross-section during heating. .2 1.2 Illustration of a ATP synthase (Image borrowed from Stock et al., 1999 [SLW99]) to harvest energy (left) compared with our fun- damental study element (Images borrowed from T. Chung et al., 2009 [CKC09]) Ni nanobar (i.e. 150nm x 30 nm x 50nm) as a po- tential working body in thermomagnetic generator system (right); note that the size scale is similar, and that both involve a transfer mechanism . .3 2.1 Schematic for generic thermal-electric energy harvesting device. .6 2.2 Thermoelectric device relative efficiency as a function of figure of merit for various operating temperatures. .8 2.3 Plot of ideal efficiency for a Seebeck effect based thermoelectric device, as a function of operating temperature difference, with cold- side temperature at Tcold = 300K and Z = 1. 10 2.4 Reduced saturation magnetization of iron, nickel and cobalt, as a function of reduced temperature, for various values of net atomic angular momentum (Image borrowed from Cullity et.al. 2011 [CG11]). 15 2.5 Graphical technique for computing reduced magnetization for the case of non-zero applied field (Image borrowed from Cullity et.al. 2011 [CG11]); curve 1 represents the case of J = 1=2. 16 2.6 Bulk behavior of a ferromagnetic material in the vicinity of its Curie point (Image borrowed from Cullity et.al. 2011 [CG11]). 18 x 3.1 ANSY S R modeling of the magnetic force of attraction between gadolinium (top rectangle) and NdFeB (bottom rectangle). 26 3.2 Simulation results revealing an anomaly between magnetic force and gadolinium thickness. 27 3.3 Polishing process to determine gadolinium
Recommended publications
  • Charles Kittel Solid-State Physicist Charles Kittel, a Professor Emeritus
    Charles Kittel Solid-state physicist Charles Kittel, a professor emeritus at the University of California, Berkeley, passed away peacefully at his home in Berkeley on 15 May 2019, two months before his 103rd birthday. Born in New York City on 18 July 1916, Charlie entered MIT in 1934. He moved to Cambridge University in 1936 and received his BA there two years later. He earned his PhD degree in 1941 from the University of Wisconsin–Madison, where his adviser was Gregory Breit. From 1940 to 1942, Charlie did research on problems in degaussing and magnetic mine warfare at the Naval Ordnance Laboratory. He served in the US Navy as a research physicist at a British Admiralty research establishment in Scotland and as a naval attaché at the US Embassy in London; he went on to work on antisubmarine warfare and operations research in Washington, DC, and London. In 1945 he returned to MIT as a researcher at the Research Laboratory of Electronics. Charlie was a research physicist in the solid-state physics group at Bell Labs in Murray Hill, New Jersey, from 1947 to 1951. His work ranged over much of solid-state theory, including magnetism, ultrasonics, and thermal properties. His association with the physics department at Berkeley began in 1950 with a visiting associate professorship. He joined the faculty as professor of physics the next year and became emeritus in 1978. Among Charlie’s many honors were the American Physical Society’s Oliver E. Buckley Condensed Matter Physics Prize in 1957, the University of California Distinguished Teaching Award in 1970, and the Oersted Medal from the American Association of Physics Teachers in 1978.
    [Show full text]
  • Structuring American Solid State Physics, 1939–1993 A
    Solid Foundations: Structuring American Solid State Physics, 1939–1993 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Joseph Daniel Martin IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Michel Janssen, Co-Advisor Sally Gregory Kohlstedt, Co-Advisor May 2013 © Joseph Daniel Martin 2013 Acknowledgements A dissertation is ostensibly an exercise in independent research. I nevertheless struggle to imagine completing one without incurring a litany of debts—intellectual, professional, and personal—similar to those described below. This might be a single-author project, but authorship is just one of many elements that brought it into being. Regrettably, this space is too small to convey full appreciation for all of them, but I offer my best attempt. I am foremost indebted to my advisors, Michel Janssen and Sally Gregory Kohlstedt, for consistent encouragement and keen commentary. Michel is one of the most incisive critics it has been my pleasure to know. If the arguments herein exhibit any subtlety, clarity, or grace it is in no small part because they steeped in Michel’s witty and weighty marginalia. I am grateful to Sally for the priceless gift of perspective. She has never let my highs carry me too high, or my lows lay me too low, and her selfless largess, bestowed in time and wisdom, has challenged me to become a humbler learner and a more conscientious colleague. My committee has enriched my scholarly life in ways that will shape my thinking for the rest of my career. Bill Wimsatt, a true intellectual force multiplier, lent me his peerless ability to distill insight from scholarship in any field.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: Pioneers of Semiconductor Physics Remember
    Appendix: Pioneers of Semiconductor Physics Remember... Semiconductor physics has a long and distinguished history. The early devel- opments culminated in the invention of the transistor by Bardeen, Shockley, and Brattain in 1948. More recent work led to the discovery of the laser diode by three groups independently in 1962. Many prominent physicists have con- tributed to this fertile and exciting field. In the following short contributions some of the pioneers have recaptured the historic moments that have helped to shape semiconductor physics as we know it today. They are (in alphabetical order): Elias Burstein Emeritus Mary Amanda Wood Professor of Physics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Editor-in-chief of Solid State Communications 1969–1992; John Price Wetherill Medal, Franklin Institute 1979; Frank Isakson Prize, American Physical Society, 1986. Marvin Cohen Professor of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Oliver Buckley Prize, American Physical Society, 1979; Julius Edgar Lilienfeld Prize, American Physical Society, 1994. Leo Esaki President, Tsukuba University, Tsukuba, Japan. Nobel Prize in Physics, 1973. Eugene Haller Professor of Materials Science and Mineral Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Alexander von Humboldt Senior Scientist Award, 1986. Max Planck Research Award, 1994. Conyers Herring Professor of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Oliver Buckley Prize, American Physical Society, 1959; Wolf Prize in Physics, 1985. 554 Appendix Charles Kittel Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. Oliver Buckley Prize, American Physical Society, 1957; Oersted Medal, American Association of Physics Teachers, 1978. Neville Smith Scientific Program Head, Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Impurity Band Conduction in Reduced Samples of Bismuth Iron Molybdate
    Lakehead University Knowledge Commons,http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca Electronic Theses and Dissertations Retrospective theses 1995 Impurity band conduction in reduced samples of bismuth iron molybdate McIntyre, Shawn M. http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/2137 Downloaded from Lakehead University, KnowledgeCommons IMPURITY BAND CONDUCTION IN REDUCED SAMPLES OF BISMUTH IRON MOLYBDATE by SHAWN M. M*'INTYRE© A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Degree of Master of Science Department of Physics Lakehead University Thunder Bay, Ontario Canada June 14, 1995 ProQuest Number: 10611907 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Pro ProQuest 10611907 Published by ProQuest LLC (2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.Q. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 - 1346 National Library Biblioth6que nationale 14^1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Direction des acquisitions et Bibliographic Services Branch des services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa (Ontario) K1A0N4 K1A0N4 Your file Votre r^f^rence Our file Notre r^f^rence The author has granted an L’auteur a accorde une licence irrevocable non-exclusive licence irrevocable et non exclusive allowing the National Library of permettant a la Bibliotheque Canada to reproduce, loan, nationale du Canada de distribute or sell copies of reproduire, preter, distribuer ou his/her thesis by any means and vendre des copies de sa these in any form or format, making de quelque maniere et sous this thesis available to interested quelque forme que ce soit pour persons.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Kittel 1916–2019
    Charles Kittel 1916–2019 A Biographical Memoir by Marvin L. Cohen and Morrel H. Cohen ©2021 National Academy of Sciences. Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. CHARLES KITTEL July 18, 1916–May 15, 2019 Elected to the NAS, 1957 Charles “Charlie” Kittel, famous for his research and teaching in the field of solid state physics (now commonly known as condensed matter physics), passed away peace- fully at his home in Berkeley on May 15, 2019, two months before his 103rd birthday. Beyond his pioneering research, Charlie had a major influence on his field through his textbooks, his award-winning teaching activities, and the outstanding cadre of people who studied under him or were attracted to him as colleagues, postdocs, and many senior visitors. His text Introduction to Solid State Physics (ISSP), originally published in 1953 and now in its eighth edition, was not only the dominant text for teaching in this field, it was on the bookshelf of researchers in academia By Marvin L. Cohen and industry throughout the world. By the fifth edition, it and Morrel H. Cohen had been translated into fifteen languages. His choice of content defined so-called “modern solid state physics” for many years, and the subject matter and basic concepts he focused on are still considered to be the core of the field. Early Life, Education, and Muriel Charlie was born in New York City on July 18, 1916. His father, George Paul Kittel (1887-1971), a Protestant, was born in Germany and emigrated to San Francisco around 1906.
    [Show full text]
  • GREGORY BREIT July 14, 1899 – September 11, 1981
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES GRE G O R Y B R E I T 1899—1981 A Biographical Memoir by M CALLISTER HULL Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1998 NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS WASHINGTON D.C. Courtesy of Alburtus—Yale News Bureau GREGORY BREIT July 14, 1899 – September 11, 1981 BY MCALLISTER HULL OR NEARLY FIFTY YEARS, Gregory Breit was a leading figure Fin the development of physics in the twentieth century. John Wheeler in Some Men and Moments in Nuclear Physics wrote, “Insufficiently appreciated in the 1930’s, he is today the most unappreciated physicist in America.” This was written in 1979, when Gregory was in physical decline, and he prob- ably never saw it, but if public recognition was slight (but by no means absent), he was appreciated very well (in spite of a difficult personality) by his students, collaborators, and colleagues. The range of his interests and duration of his active career made this cadre a large one. Trained as an electrical engineer, Breit did his early work in radio, including the definition of the characteristics of early tubes and finite coils. The most important of this work, with Merle Tuve, was the use of radio to demonstrate the existence of the postulated ionosphere by receiving return signals of a pulsed radio beam sent from the earth’s sur- face. Ranging with a pulsed signal is, of course, the prin- ciple of radar. He also inspired and worked with the pro- duction of high voltages to accelerate charged particles (protons) to use as probes of the nucleus—the first man- made probes in the United States (Cockroft and Walton at Cambridge, England, had a beam of protons and deuterons 3 4 BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIRS first, but at a lower voltage than the Carnegie team).
    [Show full text]
  • Recollections from the Early Years of Solid‐State Physics
    RECOLLECTIONS FROM THE EARLY YEARS OF SOLID-STATE PHYSICS Bardeen's devotion to solid-state physics began in the mid-1930s, when he was a graduate student and the field was young. By 1951 he had helped to discover the transistor and had set the stage for his later studies of superconductivity. Conyers Herring I first met John Bardeen in the fall of 1934, when I arrived dinner discussion, and as neither John nor I was particu- at Princeton as a second-year graduate student in astron- larly lively at initiating conversations, our acquaintance omy. John was then a graduate student in mathematics, didn't develop very fast at mealtime. but considerably more experienced than I. He had taken a Fortunately we had other contacts. Especially inter- bachelor's and a master's degree in electrical engineering esting was a series of informal meetings Edward Condon, several years earlier at the University of Wisconsin and then an associate professor, had initiated for the discus- had worked for about three years at Gulf Research and sion of currently interesting topics in physics. In the Development Laboratories as a geophysicist, concentrat- academic year 1934-35, to the best of my memory, the ing particularly on electromagnetic means of prospecting. attendees usually consisted of Condon himself, Seitz, He had become interested in physics during his years at Bardeen, me and John Blewett, who, though primarily an Wisconsin, where he had heard lectures by John H. Van experimentalist, had a great talent for and interest in Vleck, Peter J. W. Debye and Paul A.
    [Show full text]
  • Transparent Nanostructured Metal Oxides for Chemical Biosensors: Towards Point-Of-Care Environments
    Transparent nanostructured metal oxides for chemical biosensors: towards point-of-care environments Raquel Pruna Morales ADVERTIMENT. La consulta d’aquesta tesi queda condicionada a l’acceptació de les següents condicions d'ús: La difusió d’aquesta tesi per mitjà del servei TDX (www.tdx.cat) i a través del Dipòsit Digital de la UB (diposit.ub.edu) ha estat autoritzada pels titulars dels drets de propietat intel·lectual únicament per a usos privats emmarcats en activitats d’investigació i docència. No s’autoritza la seva reproducció amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva difusió i posada a disposició des d’un lloc aliè al servei TDX ni al Dipòsit Digital de la UB. No s’autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX o al Dipòsit Digital de la UB (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant al resum de presentació de la tesi com als seus continguts. En la utilització o cita de parts de la tesi és obligat indicar el nom de la persona autora. ADVERTENCIA. La consulta de esta tesis queda condicionada a la aceptación de las siguientes condiciones de uso: La difusión de esta tesis por medio del servicio TDR (www.tdx.cat) y a través del Repositorio Digital de la UB (diposit.ub.edu) ha sido autorizada por los titulares de los derechos de propiedad intelectual únicamente para usos privados enmarcados en actividades de investigación y docencia. No se autoriza su reproducción con finalidades de lucro ni su difusión y puesta a disposición desde un sitio ajeno al servicio TDR o al Repositorio Digital de la UB.
    [Show full text]