A Selection of Historical Maps of Afghanistan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Selection of Historical Maps of Afghanistan A Selection of Historical Maps of Afghanistan By Cynthia Smith August 2004 Persia Arabia & c. G7620 1855 .J2 This presentation consists of a brief history of Afghanistan, from the Persian Empire to the early 20th Century, as well as images of related maps from the collections of the Geography and Map Division, Library of Congress. Persian Empire to Mughul Dynasty Afghanistan was an important crossroads, dominated by other civilizations throughout its history. By 522 BC. Darius the Great extended the boundaries of the Persian Empire into most of the region. By 330 BC. Alexander the Great conquered Persia and Afghanistan. Buddhism was introduced in 50 AD, when Afghanistan became part of the Kushanid Empire. Hephtatlites (White Huns) invaded in the 5th century and destroyed the Buddhist culture. From 225 to 600 AD, Sassanians (Persians) established control. The first Muslim-Arab conquests occurred from 652 to 654. A succession of dynasties, the Ghaznavid, Ghorid and Timurid ruled the area from 997 to 1506 AD. Babur, the founder of India’s Mughul Dynasty governed Kabul in 1504 and in time much of the territory that is present day Afghanistan.[1] “Persarum Imperium” published in 1721 by Pierre Moulard Sanson. G7621.S23 1721 .S2 TIL The provinces (satrapies) of Bactriana and Ariana are shown on the map. Present day Mazar-e-Sharif is located in the former province of Bactriana. Herat is located in the former province of Ariana. 17th Century to the Early 19th Century Khushhal Khan Khattak, a famous Afghan warrior poet, led a rebellion against the Mughul Dynasty in the 1600s. Mir Wais Khan Hotaki revolted against Safavid rule and took over Kandahar in 1708. By 1736 Afsharid ruler, Nadir Shaw, gained control of the region. In 1747 Nadir was assassinated. Later that year Ahmad Durrani was elected king by a council of tribal leaders. During the 1760s, Ahmad Shah Durrani extended Afghanistan’s borders into part of India. The nation of Afghanistan finally began to take shape under the leadership of Ahmad Shah Durrani after centuries of invasions.[2] “A New & Accurate Map of Persia” by Emanuel Bowen reflects the boundaries of Persia in 1747. G7620 1747 .B6 Kandahar is shown within Persia. Kabul is shown outside of Persia’s boundaries within the “Kingdom of Balk.” Timur, Ahmad Shah Durrani’s son, succeeded to the throne in 1773. He ruled Afghanistan until his death in 1793, leaving over 20 sons. Timur’s descendants were later engaged in a struggle for power. His son Zaman Shah became king in 1793. Zaman Shah’s brother Mahmud captured the throne in 1800. In 1803, another brother Shah Shuja reigned after replacing Mahmud. Mahmud forced Shuja to flee in 1809 and remained king until he was driven from the throne in 1817. From 1818 until 1826, Afghanistan disintegrated into a group of small units each ruled by a different Durrani leader.[3] During this time the “Great Game” between Great Britain and Russia was beginning to be played out. “The Great Game” involved not only the confrontation of two great empires whose spheres of influence moved steadily closer to one another until they met in Afghanistan, but also the repeated attempts by a foreign power to impose a puppet government in Kabul.[4] First Anglo-Afghan War The next leader, Dost Muhammad, ascended to the throne in 1826. Concerned about growing Persian and Russian influences, the British, along with former King Shuja, invaded Afghanistan in late 1838 while Dost Muhammad was still in power. Shuja was killed a few years later and the British were defeated. Dost Muhammad returned to the throne in 1843.[5] Lithograph titled “Surrender of Dost Mahommed Khan to Sir William Hay Macnaghten Bart, at the entrance into Caubul [sic] from Killa-Kazee.” Illus. in DS352.A8 Case Y [P&P] The lithograph is from “Sketches in Afghaunistan” [sic] by James Atkinson, published in 1842 by H. Graves & Company. Treaty of Peshawar During the years after the First Anglo-Afghan War the Russians, interested in the territories of Central Asia, advanced southward. The British, hoping to stop Russian advances, resumed relations with Dost Muhammad in 1854. In 1855 the Treaty of Peshawar proclaimed respect for Afghanistan’s and Britain’s territorial integrity and declared each to be friends of each other’s friends and enemies of each other’s enemies. In 1856 the Anglo-Persian War broke out and the Qajar Dynasty took Herat back into its control.[6] Second Anglo-Afghan War During the 1860s the Russians intensified their southeastern advances. “The Russian foreign minister claimed the Russian movements in Central Asia were taken simply to unite Russia, not to oppose any other government.”[7] In 1872, Russia signed an agreement with Great Britain consenting to respect the northern boundaries of Afghanistan.[8] King Sher Ali permitted an uninvited Russian delegate to enter Kabul in July 1878. Hoping to retain the British influence, British Viceroy Lord Lytton ordered a diplomatic mission to travel to Kabul on August 14th. When no reply was received the British sent a military force to cross the Khyber Pass. Afghan authorities refused the British permission to cross. This incident triggered the Second Anglo- Afghan War. On November 21, 1878 approximately 40,000 British soldiers entered Afghanistan. The British withdrew two years later after facing strong resistance from the Afghan forces.[9] “Seat of War in Asia, Map of Afghanistan.” G7630 1875 .U5 TIL The map is dated 1878 and was taken from surveys made by British and Russian Officers. Treaty of Gandomak At the end of the Second Anglo-Afghan War, the Treaty of Gandomak was completed between the British government and Amir Yaqub Khan. The treaty was to establish peace and friendship between both countries. It provided amnesty for Afghan collaborators with the British occupational forces and committed the amir to conduct his foreign relations with advice from the British Government. Great Britain, in exchange, promised to support the amir against any foreign aggression.[10] Russian Advances 1885 Abdur Rahman Khan ruled Afghanistan from 1880-1901. He modernized the country, formed a strong army, brought in foreign professionals and imported machinery. “Caught between the Russians and the British, Abdur Rahman turned his formidable energies to what turned out to be virtually the creation of the modern state of Afghanistan, while the British and the Russians, with the Afghans as bystanders, determined the borders of the Afghan State.”[11] Russian forces seized the Merve Oasis inhabited by the Turkoman people in 1884. In 1885 they took possession of the Panjdeh Oasis. Afghan attempts to retake the territory failed. In 1886 the Anglo-Russian Boundary Commission agreed on a border along the Amu Darya River. The Russian-British agreement resulted in a permanent northern frontier, however, much territory was lost in the Panjdeh region. [12] “Map illustrative of the march of the Indian Section of the Boundary Commission from Quetta to Olerat and Badkis; of the frontier as proposed and actually demarcated, and of the author’s return journey from Herat to the Caspian.” G7631.F2 1885 .M3 The map, published in 1885, shows the western half of Afghanistan, “Russian Dominions,” “Persia” and “Belochistan.” The colored lines indicate “Boundary as actually demarcated,” “Boundary as required by the Russians,” and “Boundary as required by the Afghans.” The Durand Line On November 12, 1893, Abdur Rahman Khan, and the Foreign Secretary of the Colonial Government of India, Sir Mortimer Durand, agreed to mark the boundary between Afghanistan and British India. The Durand Line cut through Pashtun tribal areas and villages. It was a cause of dispute between the governments of Afghanistan and British India and later between Afghanistan and Pakistan.[13] “Afghanistan, Beloochistan, etc.” G7630 1893 .H8 TIL A map of Afghanistan, published in 1893, the year Abdur Rahman Khan and Sir Mortimer Durand agreed to mark the boundary between Afghanistan and British India. Early 20th Century Abdur Rahman’s son, Habibullah, reigned from 1901-1919. In 1904 a boundary commission determined the border between Iran and Afghanistan. The boundary was accepted by both countries. The Anglo-Russian Convention of 1907 divided Afghanistan into areas of Russian and British influence. Habibullah wanted full Afghan independence and Great Britain’s assistance in an attempt to regain lands taken by the Russians. “Britain far more interested in the European power struggle and the defense of India through an Afghan buffer state was uninterested in such a scheme.”[14] Habibullah was assassinated in 1919. His son Amanullah succeeded him. During his reign the month long Third Anglo-Afghan War of 1919 resulted in complete Afghan independence. Amanullah established diplomatic relationships with Russia in 1919, Iran in 1921 and Great Britain in 1922.[15] Images of other historical maps of Afghanistan and Southwest Asia are available on Map Collections 1500-2004, www.loc.gov/rr/geogmap. Additional maps will be added periodically. Endnotes 1 Adamec, Ludwig W. Historical Dictionary of Afghanistan. 2nd ed. London: The Scarecrow Press, Inc., 1997. 122, 125, 198, 331-332. 2 Nystrop, Richard F. And Donald M. Seekins, eds. Afghanistan a Country Study. Washington: Library of Congress, 1986. 13-14. 3 Nystrop, 22. 4 Nystrop, 23. 5 Nystrop, 28-30. 6 Nystrop, 30-31. 7 Reshtia, Sayed Qassem. Between Two Giants: Political History of Afghanistan in the Nineteenth Century. Peshawar: Afghan Jehad Works Translation Centre, 1990. 285. 8 Nystrop, 32. 9 Nystrop, 33. 10 Adamec, 114. 11 Nystrop, 34-35. 12 Nystrop, 36. 13 Nystrop, 38. 14 Nystrop, 39-40. 15 Nystrop, 41-42. .
Recommended publications
  • Afghan Women at the Crossroads: Agents of Peace—Or Its Victims?
    AFGHAN WOMEN AT THE CROSSROADS: AGENTS OF PEACE—OR ITS VICTIMS? ORZALA ASHRAF NEMAT A CENTURY FOUNDATION REPORT The Century Foundation Headquarters: 41 East 70th Street, New York, New York 10021 D 212.535.4441 D.C.: 1333 H Street, N.W., 10th floor, Washington, D.C. 20005 D 202.387.0400 THE CENTURY FOUNDATION PROJECT ON AFGHANISTAN IN ITS REGIONAL AND MULTILATERAL DIMENSIONS This paper is one of a series commissioned by The Century Foundation as part of its project on Afghanistan in its regional and multilateral dimensions. This initiative is examining ways in which the international community may take greater collective responsibility for effectively assisting Afghanistan’s transition from a war-ridden failed state to a fragile but reasonably peaceful one. The program adds an internationalist and multilateral lens to the policy debate on Afghanistan both in the United States and globally, engaging the representatives of governments, international nongovernmental organizations, and the United Nations in the exploration of policy options toward Afghanistan and the other states in the region. At the center of the project is a task force of American and international figures who have had significant governmental, nongovernmental, or UN experience in the region, co-chaired by Lakhdar Brahimi and Thomas Pickering, respectively former UN special representative for Afghanistan and former U.S. undersecretary of state for political affairs. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors. Nothing written here is to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of The Century Foundation or as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Nation Building Process in Afghanistan Ziaulhaq Rashidi1, Dr
    Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Abbreviated Key Title: Saudi J Humanities Soc Sci ISSN 2415-6256 (Print) | ISSN 2415-6248 (Online) Scholars Middle East Publishers, Dubai, United Arab Emirates Journal homepage: http://scholarsmepub.com/sjhss/ Original Research Article Nation Building Process in Afghanistan Ziaulhaq Rashidi1, Dr. Gülay Uğur Göksel2 1M.A Student of Political Science and International Relations Program 2Assistant Professor, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Turkey *Corresponding author: Ziaulhaq Rashidi | Received: 04.04.2019 | Accepted: 13.04.2019 | Published: 30.04.2019 DOI:10.21276/sjhss.2019.4.4.9 Abstract In recent times, a number of countries faced major cracks and divisions (religious, ethnical and geographical) with less than a decade war/instability but with regards to over four decades of wars and instabilities, the united and indivisible Afghanistan face researchers and social scientists with valid questions that what is the reason behind this unity and where to seek the roots of Afghan national unity, despite some minor problems and ethnic cracks cannot be ignored?. Most of the available studies on nation building process or Afghan nationalism have covered the nation building efforts from early 20th century and very limited works are available (mostly local narratives) had touched upon the nation building efforts prior to the 20th. This study goes beyond and examine major struggles aimed nation building along with the modernization of state in Afghanistan starting from late 19th century. Reforms predominantly the language (Afghani/Pashtu) and role of shared medium of communication will be deliberated. In addition, we will talk how the formation of strong centralized government empowered the state to initiate social harmony though the demographic and geographic oriented (north-south) resettlement programs in 1880s and how does it contributed to the nation building process.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Game to 9/11
    Air Force Engaging the World Great Game to 9/11 A Concise History of Afghanistan’s International Relations Michael R. Rouland COVER Aerial view of a village in Farah Province, Afghanistan. Photo (2009) by MSst. Tracy L. DeMarco, USAF. Department of Defense. Great Game to 9/11 A Concise History of Afghanistan’s International Relations Michael R. Rouland Washington, D.C. 2014 ENGAGING THE WORLD The ENGAGING THE WORLD series focuses on U.S. involvement around the globe, primarily in the post-Cold War period. It includes peacekeeping and humanitarian missions as well as Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom—all missions in which the U.S. Air Force has been integrally involved. It will also document developments within the Air Force and the Department of Defense. GREAT GAME TO 9/11 GREAT GAME TO 9/11 was initially begun as an introduction for a larger work on U.S./coalition involvement in Afghanistan. It provides essential information for an understanding of how this isolated country has, over centuries, become a battleground for world powers. Although an overview, this study draws on primary- source material to present a detailed examination of U.S.-Afghan relations prior to Operation Enduring Freedom. Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. government. Cleared for public release. Contents INTRODUCTION The Razor’s Edge 1 ONE Origins of the Afghan State, the Great Game, and Afghan Nationalism 5 TWO Stasis and Modernization 15 THREE Early Relations with the United States 27 FOUR Afghanistan’s Soviet Shift and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • My Memoirs Shah Wali Khan
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Digitized Books Archives & Special Collections 1970 My Memoirs Shah Wali Khan Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/ascdigitizedbooks Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Khan, Shah Wali, "My Memoirs" (1970). Digitized Books. 18. http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/ascdigitizedbooks/18 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Archives & Special Collections at DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Digitized Books by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MY MEMOIRS ( \ ~ \ BY HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS SARDAR SHAH WALi VICTOR OF KABUL KABUL COLUMN OF JNDEPENDENCE Afghan Coll. 1970 DS 371 sss A313 His Royal Highness Marshal Sardar Shah Wali Khan Victor of Kabul MY MEMOIRS BY HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS MARSHAL SARDAR SHAH WALi VICTOR OF KABUL KABUL 1970 PRINTED IN PAKISTAN BY THE PUNJAB EDUCATIONAL PRESS, , LAHORE CONTENTS PART I THE WAR OF INDEPENDENCE Pages A Short Biography of His Royal Highness Sardar Shah Wali Khan, Victor of Kabul i-iii 1. My Aim 1 2. Towards the South 7 3. The Grand Assembly 13 4. Preliminary Steps 17 5. Fall of Thal 23 6. Beginning of Peace Negotiations 27 7. The Armistice and its Effects 29 ~ 8. Back to Kabul 33 PART II DELIVERANCE OF THE COUNTRY 9. Deliverance of the Country 35 C\'1 10. Beginning of Unrest in the Country 39 er 11. Homewards 43 12. Arrival of Sardar Shah Mahmud Ghazi 53 Cµ 13. Sipah Salar's Activities 59 s:: ::s 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Creativity Strategies in the Hazara Struggle Toward Identity and Healing
    Confronting Misconstrued Histories: Creativity Strategies in the Hazara Struggle toward Identity and Healing Farzana Marie This paper explores creative means of nonviolent social struggle among the Hazara people of Afghanistan as an effective and widespread response to the violence and oppression they have endured for more than a century both in and outside of Afghanistan. Systematic eth- nic and religious persecution against Hazaras, who are majority Shi’a, by extremist Sunni, usually Pashtun groups has attempted to destroy their culture and belittle their identity. However, despite available means of armed resistance, most Hazaras have seen violence as a last resort and have chosen to creatively confront their situation in more subtle yet powerful ways such as education, academic research, political activism, and the arts. At their core, these strategies serve not only as means of resistance, but more importantly as a way to collectively acknowledge and remember lost history, recreate lost identity, and thereby open the way for healing. Acknowledgments The nature of the subject naturally led to a unique research approach. While a variety of written primary and secondary sources provided an essential understanding of historical narratives and debates, the lifeblood of my argument and insights flows from interviews with a number of Hazara leaders, public figures, and activists in several fields and diverse locations from Kabul to Australia and Norway. I am indebted to these consultants for their insights and thankful for the time spent in discussion of these topics, leading to a much-refined understanding. All 86 | Arizona Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies | Volume 2 | Spring 2013 material is used by permission.
    [Show full text]
  • <H1>The Afghan Wars 1839-42 and 1878-80 by Archibald Forbes</H1>
    The Afghan Wars 1839-42 and 1878-80 by Archibald Forbes The Afghan Wars 1839-42 and 1878-80 by Archibald Forbes Produced by Eric Eldred, Thomas Berger, and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team. [Illustration: Sir Frederick Roberts] * * * * * THE AFGHAN WARS 1839-42 AND 1878-80 by ARCHIBALD FORBES With Portraits and Plans * * * * * CONTENTS page 1 / 337 PART I.--THE FIRST AFGHAN WAR CHAP. I.--PRELIMINARY II.--THE MARCH TO CABUL III.--THE FIRST YEAR OF OCCUPATION IV.--THE SECOND YEAR OF OCCUPATION V.--THE BEGINNING OF THE END VI.--THE ROAD TO RUIN VII.--THE CATASTROPHE VIII.--THE SIEGE AND DEFENCE OF JELLALABAD IX.--RETRIBUTION AND RESCUE page 2 / 337 PART II.--THE SECOND AFGHAN WAR I.--THE FIRST CAMPAIGN II.--THE OPENING OF THE SECOND CAMPAIGN III.--THE LULL BEFORE THE STORM IV.--THE DECEMBER STORM V.--ON THE DEFENSIVE IN SHERPUR VI.--AHMED KHEL VII.--THE AMEER ABDURRAHMAN VIII.--MAIWAND AND THE GREAT MARCH IX.--THE BATTLE OF CANDAHAR * * * * * LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS AND PLANS page 3 / 337 PORTRAIT OF SIR FREDERICK ROBERTS _Frontispiece_ PLAN OF CABUL, THE CANTONMENT PORTRAIT OF SIR GEORGE POLLOCK PORTRAIT OF SIR LOUIS CAVAGNARI AND SIRDARS PLAN OF CABUL SHOWING THE ACTIONS, DEC. 11-14 PLAN OF ACTION, AHMED KHEL PORTRAIT OF THE AMEER ABDURRAHMAN PLAN OF THE ACTION OF MAIWAND PLAN OF THE ACTION OF CANDAHAR _The Portraits of Sir G. Pollock and Sir F. Roberts are engraved by permission of Messrs Henry Graves & Co._ page 4 / 337 * * * * * THE AFGHAN WARS PART I: _THE FIRST AFGHAN WAR_ CHAPTER I: PRELIMINARY Since it was the British complications with Persia which mainly furnished what pretext there was for the invasion of Afghanistan by an Anglo-Indian army in 1839, some brief recital is necessary of the relations between Great Britain and Persia prior to that aggression.
    [Show full text]
  • British Interventions in Afghanistan and the Afghans' Struggle To
    University of Oran 2 Faculty of Foreign Languages Doctoral Thesis Submitted in British Civilization Entitled: British Interventions in Afghanistan and the Afghans’ Struggle to Achieve Independence (1838-1921) Presented and submitted Publicaly by by: Mr Mehdani Miloud in front of a jury composed of Jury Members Designation University Pr.Bouhadiba Zoulikha President Oran 2 Pr. Lahouel Badra Supervisor Oran 2 Pr. Moulfi Leila Examiner Oran 2 Pr. Benmoussat Smail Examiner Tlemcen Dr. Dani Fatiha Examiner Oran 1 Dr. Meberbech Fewzia Examiner Tlemcen 2015-2016 Dedication To my daughter Nardjes (Nadjet) . Abstract The British loss of the thirteen colonies upon the American independence in 1783 moved Britain to concentrate her efforts on India. Lying between the British and Russian empires as part of the Great Game, Afghanistan grew important for the Russians, for it constituted a gateway to India. As a result, the British wanted to make of Afghanistan a buffer state to ward off a potential Russian invasion of India. Because British-ruled India government accused the Afghan Amir of duplicity, she intervened in Afghanistan in 1838 to topple the Afghan Amir, Dost Mohammad and re-enthrone an Afghan ‗puppet‘ king named Shah Shuja. The British made their second intervention in Afghanistan (1878-1880) because the Anglo-Russian rivalry persisted. The result was both the annexation of some of the Afghans‘ territory and the confiscation of their sovereignty over their foreign policy. Unlike the British first and second interventions in Afghanistan, the third one, even though short, was significant because it was instigated by the Afghan resistance. Imbued with nationalist and Pan-Islamist ideologies, the Afghans were able to free their country from the British domination.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan - Nuristanis
    Afghanistan - Nuristanis minorityrights.org/minorities/nuristanis/ June 19, 2015 Profile Nuristanis arrived in Afghanistan fleeing the eastward spread of Islam. They speak an unique Indo-European-language. Nuristanis were conquered by Amir Abdur Rahman Khan in 1895-96 and were obliged to abandon their ancient religious belief in favour of Islam. They reside mainly in the east of the country – between the Pashtun tribes of Kunar, Kalash in Pakistan's Chitral, and Tajiks of Badakhshan in the north. Nuristan (land of light) is located on the southern slope of the Hindu Kush mountain range and is spread over four valleys, with each valley having its own distinct language/dialect: Kati, Waigali, Ashkun and Parsun. Nuristan has very little arable land, the vast majority of the territory being covered by forest. The main base of the economy is animal husbandry – mostly goat-herding. While maize and barley are grown in small quantities, the Nuristani people survive mainly on subsistence agriculture, wheat, fruit and goats. Very few Nuristanis have had access to education. Yet, among those who have travelled to Kabul and been able to gain access to schools, some have gained prominence as well-known figures in the army and the government in Kabul. Historical context The Nuristanis' scattered settlement is another result of Amir Abdul Rahman's late-nineteenth- century expansionism. During his rule, what was then called Kafiristan (Kafir meaning infidel as Nuristanis did not convert to Islam until the twentieth century) was renamed as Nuristan (‘land of light') after the forced Islamization of the tribe. Nuristanis are still sometimes referred to as ‘Kafir'.
    [Show full text]
  • State-Building, Migration and Economic Development on the Frontiers of Northern Afghanistan and Southern Tajikistan
    Journal of Eurasian Studies 3 (2012) 69–79 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Eurasian Studies journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/euras State-building, migration and economic development on the frontiers of northern Afghanistan and southern Tajikistan Christian Bleuer* Centre for Arab and Islamic Studies – The Middle East and Central Asia, The Australian National University, 127 Ellery Crescent, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia article info abstract Article history: The Kunduz River Valley of northern Afghanistan and the Vakhsh River Valley of southern Received 12 August 2011 Tajikistan followed what initially appear to be vastly different trajectories. Despite these Accepted 14 September 2011 two adjacent areas having had much in common throughout many periods of history, the present-day region of northern Afghanistan was eventually taken under the control of the Keywords: Afghan state while the areas north of the Amu Darya and Panj River were to become part of Central Asia the Soviet Union. However, instead of a divergent course of development and state- Forced migration building, these two regions were subjected to very similar patterns of agricultural devel- Agriculture “ ” Ethnic relations opment and migration policies. Empty areas were to be populated, by force if necessary, State-building wetlands were to be drained for agriculture, and cotton farming was to become pre- eminent. The end result in both areas was the creation of a socially diverse and economically significant region that was fully integrated into the modern state’s economy and politics. This article analyzes and compares the motives and implementation of the state-building projects in both of these now domestically important regions and finds remarkable similarities despite the obvious differences in the structure of the Afghan and Soviet states.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taliban, Foreign Occupation, and Afghan
    1 RESISTANCE BY OTHER MEANS: THE TALIBAN, FOREIGN OCCUPATION, AND AFGHAN NATIONAL IDENTITY A dissertation presented by Mariam Atifa Raqib to The Law, Policy and Society Program In partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the field of Law, Policy and Society Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts April, 2011 2 RESISTANCE BY OTHER MEANS: THE TALIBAN, FOREIGN OCCUPATION, AND AFGHAN NATIONAL IDENTITY by Mariam Atifa Raqib Policy analysts frequently portray the Taliban resistance as an exclusively Islamic movement. Culturally deterministic notions regarding Islamic societies have negatively influenced western governments’ policies towards Muslim states. The research here advances the hypothesis that the current conflict in Afghanistan is not about “Islam.” At its core the Taliban resistance is a nationalist challenge to foreign forces and their Afghan allies. Furthermore, the roots of this movement are foreign occupation, continued years of war and violence, and a lack of genuine effort on the part of the incumbent regime to implement necessary socio-economic and political reforms. This work claims that the success of the Taliban movement is firmly rooted in their appropriation of religious symbols, discourse and terminology — particularly Shariat, or Islamic law — to channel the frustrations of a grieving population. Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the field of Law, Policy and Society in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Northeastern University, April 2011 3 Acknowledgements This dissertation has culminated from many years of research. I am privileged to have a group of people who have been supportive to me.
    [Show full text]
  • South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal , Free-Standing Articles Shah Shuja’S ‘Hidden History’ and Its Implications for the Historiography of
    South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal Free-Standing Articles | 2012 Shah Shuja’s ‘Hidden History’ and its Implications for the Historiography of Afghanistan Shah Mahmoud Hanifi Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/samaj/3384 DOI: 10.4000/samaj.3384 ISSN: 1960-6060 Publisher Association pour la recherche sur l'Asie du Sud (ARAS) Electronic reference Shah Mahmoud Hanifi, « Shah Shuja’s ‘Hidden History’ and its Implications for the Historiography of Afghanistan », South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal [Online], Free-Standing Articles, Online since 14 May 2012, connection on 03 May 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/samaj/3384 ; DOI : 10.4000/samaj.3384 This text was automatically generated on 3 May 2019. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Shah Shuja’s ‘Hidden History’ and its Implications for the Historiography of ... 1 Shah Shuja’s ‘Hidden History’ and its Implications for the Historiography of Afghanistan Shah Mahmoud Hanifi Introduction: Locating Shuja in the first Anglo-Afghan war and in the context of the Pashtun domination hypothesis 1 The first Anglo-Afghan war of 1839-1842 sets the stage for this examination of Shah Shuja, and the large volume of literature on the war itself requires attention before we can turn to the Afghan monarch who is most intimately associated with the catastrophic colonial failure in Pashtun dominated Afghanistan. The first Anglo-Afghan war is well documented yet poorly understood. It is well documented from the diplomatic and military perspectives, but questions still remain about what is generally viewed as the most consequential defeat suffered by colonial forces in the history of the British Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the War in Afghanistan Part 2
    A. P. THORNTON. ED M OND & S PARk< Presented to the LIBRARY of the UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO from the library of A. P. Thornton HISTORY THE WAR IN AFGHANISTAN. HISTORY OF THE WAR IN AFGHANISTAN. Br JOHN WILLIAM KAYE, F.K.S. THIRD EDITION, IN THREE VOLUMES. VOL. II. LONDON: WM. H. ALLEN & CO., 13, WATEELOO PLACE, ^u&ltsfjcrs to tfje Iniiia ©ffirc. 1874. LONDON . l-RINTKD BY W. CIOWES AND SOKS, STAMFORD STREET am; CilAKlNG CBOSS. U'i- V O X' AUB %\ mi CONTENTS. BOOK IV. CHAPTER I. [August—December, 1839.] PAGE l)a,wn of the Restoration—Difficulties of our Position—Proposed Withdrawal of the Army—Arrival of Colonel Wade—His Operations —Lord on the Hindoo- Koosh—Evils of our Policy— Defective Agency—MooUah Shikore—Our Political Agents— Operations in the Khybur Pass—The Fall of Khelat . 1 CHAPTER II. [January—September, 1840.] The Great Game in Central Asia—The Russian Expedition to Khiva —Apprehensions of Burnes —Colonel Stoddart—Affairs on the Hindoo-Koosh—Failure of the Russian Expedition—Con- duct of the Sikhs—Herat and Yar Mahomed—Mission of Abbott and Shakespear—Disturbances in the Ghilzye Country —Fall of Khelat—Arthur Conolly 32 CHAPTER III. [June—November, 1840.] The last Struggles of Dost Mahomed—The British in the Hindoo- Koosh —The Ameer's Family—Occupation of Bajgah—Disaster of Kamurd—Escape of Dost Mahomed —Feverish State of Caubul—Dannie's 13rigade—Defeat of the Ameer—Sale in the Kohistan— The Battle of Purwandurrah—Sui'render of Dost Mahomed ......... 73 VI CONTENTS. CHAPTER IT. [November, 1840—September, 1841.] — — PAGE Yar Mahomed and—the Douranees Season of Peace— Position of the Douranees— The Zemindawer Outbreak— Conduct of Yar Mahomed Departure— of Major Todd Risings of the Dou- ranees —and Ghilzyes Engagements with Aktur Khan and the Gooroo Dispersion of the Insurgents ....
    [Show full text]