DOCSLIB.ORG

Smart Motorways Programme Environmental Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Smart Motorways Programme Environmental Assessment Report Smart Motorways Programme Environmental Assessment Report M62 Junctions 20 to 25 (Preliminary Design – PCF Stage 3) HE551534-WSP-EGN-SG-RP-LE-00025 July 2020 Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Highways England’s information and use in relation to the Smart Motorways Programme. Environmental Assessment Report January 2020 Smart Motorways Programme M62 Junctions 20 to 25 Environmental Assessment Report Revision history Job number: HE551534 Document ref: HE551534-WSP-EGN-SG-RP-LE- 00025 Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Approved Date P01 S4 – Issue for final 01/07/20 sign-off P02 S4 – Issue for final 03/07/20 sign-off Client signoff Client Highways England Project M62 Junctions 20-25 Document title Environmental Assessment Report Job no. HE551534 Document HE551534-WSP-EGN-SG-RP-LE-00025 reference Environmental Assessment Report July 2020 Table of Contents Executive Summary i 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background to the Smart Motorway Programme 1 The Proposed Scheme 2 Purpose of this Environmental Assessment Report 2 Reporting 4 Regulation and Guidance 4 Expertise used to undertake the assessment 7 Stakeholder Engagement 9 2. The Proposed Scheme 10 Need for the Proposed Scheme 10 Existing Motorway 11 Description of the Proposed Scheme 14 Rectification, mitigation and enhancement 34 Construction Works 40 Forecast Traffic Characteristics 52 3. Alternatives Considered 64 Programme Level Alternatives 64 Scheme Specific Alternatives 64 4. Approach to Assessment 66 Introduction 66 Screening 66 Methodology 74 5. Air Quality 78 Introduction 78 Methodology 79 Baseline Conditions 89 Assessment of Effects 95 Residual Effects 99 Summary 99 Recommendations 100 6. Biodiversity 101 101 Introduction 101 Scoping 102 Methodology 103 Baseline Conditions 115 Assessment of Effects 125 Design, Mitigation and Enhancement Measures 132 Environmental Assessment Report July 2020 Smart Motorways Programme M62 Junctions 20 to 25 Environmental Assessment Report Residual Effects 139 7. Landscape and Cultural Heritage 140 Introduction 140 Scoping 141 Methodology 144 Baseline Conditions 156 Assessment of Effects 184 Design, Mitigation and Enhancement Measures 193 Residual Effects 196 Summary 197 8. Noise and Vibration 199 Introduction 199 Scoping 200 Methodology 201 Baseline Conditions 208 Assessment of Effects 214 Design, Mitigation and Rectification Measures 229 Residual Effects 250 Summary 251 Cumulative Impacts 252 9. Road Drainage and the Water Environment 254 Introduction 254 Scoping 255 Methodology 257 Baseline Conditions 266 Assessment of construction effects 287 Assessment of operational effects 290 Design, mitigation and enhancement measures 294 Residual effects 295 Summary 295 10. Assessment of Combined and Cumulative Effects 296 10.1 Introduction 296 Scoping 297 Methodology 298 Potential Effects 303 11. Abbreviations 315 Environmental Assessment Report July 2020 Smart Motorways Programme M62 Junctions 20 to 25 Environmental Assessment Report List of Tables Table 1-1 - Report Structure ......................................................................................................... 4 Table 1-2 - Fulfilment of the amended EIA Directive (2014/52/EU) ............................................... 5 Table 1-3 - Professional Competency ........................................................................................... 8 Table 2-1 - Existing Structures.................................................................................................... 12 Table 2-2 - Proposed Carriageway Configurations ..................................................................... 17 Table 2-3 - Proposed and Existing Rigid Concrete Barrier Locations .......................................... 19 Table 2-4 - Proposed New Emergency Area Locations .............................................................. 22 Table 2-5 - Gantry and Signing Provision ................................................................................... 23 Table 2-6 - Roadside Devices..................................................................................................... 27 Table 2-7 - Proposed Signs and Signals ..................................................................................... 28 Table 2-8 - Proposed Works to Overbridges .............................................................................. 29 Table 2-9 - Proposed Works to Underbridges ............................................................................. 31 Table 2-10 - Potential Locations for New or Upgrade Power Supply ............................................. 31 Table 2-11 - Priority Outfalls and Culvert Locations (High Priority or Above) ................................ 35 Table 2-12 - Drainage Works at Flooding Hotspots ...................................................................... 38 Table 2-13 - Works to Noise Barriers ............................................................................................ 38 Table 2-14 - Estimated Vegetation Clearance Requirements ....................................................... 42 Table 2-15 - Site Clearance Assumptions ..................................................................................... 44 Table 2-16 - Estimated Number of Portal and Cantilever Structures Requiring Removal .............. 46 Table 2-17 - Potential Total Traffic Flows 2300-0500 .................................................................... 49 Table 2-18 - Estimate of number of carriageway or full motorway closures................................... 50 Table 2-19 - RIS Schemes – Likely Region of Influence ............................................................... 52 Table 2-20 - Local Authority Schemes – Likely Region of Influence .............................................. 54 Table 2-21 - Summary of Developments ...................................................................................... 56 Table 3-1 - Principal Design Changes between DF1 to DF3 ....................................................... 65 Table 4-1 - Scoping Conclusions ................................................................................................ 66 Table 5-1 - Magnitude of Change Criteria for Local Air Quality ................................................... 87 Table 5-2 - Guideline to Number of Receptors Constituting a Significant Effect ........................... for Air Quality............................................................................................................ 88 Table 5-3 - AQMA within the Proposed Scheme’s Study Area .................................................... 91 Table 5-4 - Local Authority Diffusion Tubes in Exceedance within the ........................................... Proposed Scheme’s Study Area ............................................................................... 93 Table 5-5 - Highways England Diffusion Tubes in Exceedance within the Proposed Scheme’s Study Area ............................................................................................... 94 3 Table 5-6 - Summary of Modelled Annual Mean NO2 at Worst Case Receptors (μg/m ) ............. 96 Table 5-7 - Number of Receptors with Perceptible Changes in Air Quality Above the Objective Value ........................................................................................................ 99 Table 5-8 - Overall Evaluation of Local Air Quality Significance .................................................. 99 Table 6-1 - Study Area and EZol for Each Ecological Receptor ................................................ 103 Table 6-2 - Results of Second Run of the Natural England Rapid Risk Assessment ................ 107 Table 6-3 - Resource Valuation, Adapted from IAN 130/10 ..................................................... 109 Table 6-4 - Magnitude of Impact for Biodiversity ...................................................................... 111 Table 6-5 - Significance of Effects (IAN 130/10) ....................................................................... 112 Table 6-6 - Significance of Effects Matrix for Biodiversity Categories........................................ 112 Table 6-7 - Summary of Assumptions and Limitations .............................................................. 113 Table 6-8 - Sites of Biological Importance within 1km of the Proposed Scheme ....................... 117 Table 6-9 - Phase 1 Habitats within the study area and their listing as Habitats of.......................... Principal Importance and Local Biodiversity Action Plan Habitat ............................. 119 Table 6-10 - Potential for Bat Roots in Structures, 2018 Surveys ............................................... 120 Table 6-11 - Summary of Baseline Conditions and Value of Ecological Features ....................... 124 Table 6-12 - Loss of Habitats of Principal Importance ................................................................. 128 Table 6-13 - Design, Mitigation and Enhancement Measures ..................................................... 133 Environmental Assessment Report July 2020 Smart Motorways Programme M62 Junctions 20 to 25 Environmental Assessment Report Table 7-1 - Change to Potentially Susceptible Visual Receptors Recorded in Environmental Scoping Report ............................................................................... 142 Table 7-2 - Landscape and Visual Sensitivity Criteria ............................................................... 147 Table 7-3 - Magnitude of Impact – Landscape
Load more

Recommended publications
  • All Latest Website Burial Work
    YEAR FORENAME MIDDLE NAME SURNAME ABODE DATE AGE PLOT NO BURIAL REGISTER, GRAVESTONE DETAILS & COMMENTS 1950 Henry Moore Lindley 24/02/50 86 y A01 24 Thornhill Avenue (exhumed 7th June 1975) 1840 Hannah Booth Rastrick 18/05/40 13y a02 1847 Samuel Kitchen Rastrick 10/10/47 1y A03 1879 Rebecca Kitchen Rastrick 30/12/79 2y 11m a04 1845 Sally Kitchen Rastrick 09/02/45 8m A04 1880 Edward Kitchen Rastrick 13/09/80 1y 10m a04 1939 Clara Letitia Kitchen Dewsbury 14/08/39 75 y a04 full 58 Healas Road 1865 Mary Marshall Rastrick 18/04/65 82y a06 1841 Edwin Thornton Rastrick 01/06/41 29y a06 s. of Richard Frederick Thornton (carpenter & Mary his wife), all buried together in Plot a06 1828 Thomas Frederick Thornton Rastrick 12/07/28 18y 9m a06* s. of Richd. Frederick & Mary Thornton, carpenter, (buried in plot a06 as identified by Edwin Thornton's burial register entry) 1833 Charles Thornton Rastrick 10/01/33 25y a06* Carpenter, s. of Richard Frederick Thornton, carpenter & Mary his wife 1832 Richard Frederick Thornton Rastrick 20/03/32 45y a06* Carpenter, husband of Mary & father of Thomas Frederick Thornton (who died 1828) 1847 EliZabeth Cheetham Elland 29/01/47 29y A07 1838 Richard Rouse Brighouse 04/02/38 17y a09 1851 George Henry Aspinall Southowram 02/04/51 7y A10 s. of Squire & Ann Aspinall 1872 Ann Aspinall Brighouse 19/03/72 69y a10 wife of Squire Aspinall, mother of Samuel & John 1874 Squire Aspinall Brighouse 01/07/74 73y a10 Husband of Ann, father of Samuel & John 1832 Samuel Aspinall Rastrick 07/11/32 1y A10* s.
    [Show full text]
  • SPOC | Central Pennines Strategic
    This document is Not for Publication - On-going Research Central Pennines: Strategic Development Corridor - Strategic Programme Outline Case Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................. 7 Strategic Dimension ........................................................................... 15 2 Introduction ................................................................................ 15 3 The Case for Change .................................................................... 26 4 The Need for Intervention ........................................................... 66 5 Wider Context ............................................................................. 70 6 Option Assessment Process ......................................................... 72 7 Strategic Dimension Summary ..................................................... 87 Economic Dimension........................................................................... 89 8 Introduction ................................................................................ 89 9 Approach to Cost Estimation ........................................................ 95 10 Quantified SDC Programme Impacts ............................................ 98 11 Economy Impacts ...................................................................... 104 12 Environment Impacts ................................................................ 106 13 Social Impacts........................................................................... 111 14
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Confirmation of a Compulsory Purchase Order
    NOTICE OF CONFIRMATION OF A COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER THE HIGHWAYS ENGLAND (M621 MOTORWAY JUNCTIONS 1 TO 7 IMPROVEMENTS) COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER 2019 COMPULSORY PURCHASE OF LAND AND NEW RIGHTS IN THE PARISHES OF BEESTON & HOLBECK AND HUNSLET & RIVERSIDE IN THE CITY OF LEEDS THE HIGHWAYS ACT 1980 AND THE ACQUISITION OF LAND ACT 1981 1. Notice is hereby given that the Secretary of State for Transport, in exercise of his powers under the above Acts, on 27 November 2020 confirmed ‘The Highways England (M621 Motorway Junctions 1 to 7 Improvements) Compulsory Purchase Order 2019’ (“the Order”) submitted by Highways England Company Limited (“Highways England”). 2. The Order as confirmed provides for the purchase for the purposes of: (a) the improvement of the M621 Motorway from its junction with the M62 Motorway Junction 27 to approximately 1.1Km south of the centre of the M621 Motorway Junction 7 roundabout; (b) the construction and improvement of highways and the provision of new means of access to premises in pursuance of The Highways England (M621 Motorway Junctions 1 to 7 Improvements) (Side Roads) Order 2019; and (c) use by the acquiring authority in connection with the construction and improvement of highways and the provision of private means of access to premises as aforesaid of land and new rights in the parishes of Beeston & Holbeck and Hunslet & Riverside in the City of Leeds, described in Schedule 1 hereto. 3. A copy of the Order as confirmed by the Secretary of State for Transport and the Map referred to therein may be inspected on the Highways England website at www.highwaysengland.co.uk/projects/m621-junctions-1-to-7/ or a copy requested free of charge by email to [email protected] or by Telephone: 0300 123 5000.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Pattern of Wards for the Electoral Review of Rochdale Borough
    Electoral Review of Rochdale__________________________________________________________ Proposed Pattern of Wards for the Electoral Review of Rochdale Borough Introduction 1. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE) informed the Council, in early 2019, of its decision to carry out an Electoral Review of the Council size (number of elected Councillors) and the number of wards and ward boundaries for Rochdale Borough Council. 1.1 This report sets out the Council’s response to the invitation from the LGBCE to put forward its preferred future pattern of wards for Rochdale Borough. 1.2 All of the proposed warding patterns within this submission adhere to the statutory criteria governing electoral reviews set out by the LGBCE: The new pattern of wards should mean that each councillor represents roughly the same number of voters as elected members elsewhere in the authority to secure equality of representation. Ward patterns should, as far as possible, reflect community interests and identities and boundaries should be identifiable. The electoral arrangements should promote effective and convenient local government and reflect the electoral cycle of the council. 1.3 In developing the future pattern of wards, the Council has recognised the importance of electoral equality to a fair democratic process and has understood and considered that delivering Rochdale’s priorities relies on ward boundaries which reflect the communities they serve, bringing partners and communities with common interests and identities within clearly recognised geographical boundaries. 1.4 The proposed ward boundaries within this submission seek to capture the characteristics of Rochdale’s established and emerging communities whilst reflecting the important role these boundaries will play in supporting the delivery of public service from 2022 onwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Wakefield, West Riding: the Economy of a Yorkshire Manor
    WAKEFIELD, WEST RIDING: THE ECONOMY OF A YORKSHIRE MANOR By BRUCE A. PAVEY Bachelor of Arts Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 1991 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS May, 1993 OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY WAKEFIELD, WEST RIDING: THE ECONOMY OF A YORKSHIRE MANOR Thesis Approved: ~ ThesiSAd er £~ A J?t~ -Dean of the Graduate College ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am deeply indebted to to the faculty and staff of the Department of History, and especially the members of my advisory committee for the generous sharing of their time and knowledge during my stay at O.S.U. I must thank Dr. Alain Saint-Saens for his generous encouragement and advice concerning not only graduate work but the historian's profession in general; also Dr. Joseph Byrnes for so kindly serving on my committee at such short notice. To Dr. Ron Petrin I extend my heartfelt appreciation for his unflagging concern for my academic progress; our relationship has been especially rewarding on both an academic and personal level. In particular I would like to thank my friend and mentor, Dr. Paul Bischoff who has guided my explorations of the medieval world and its denizens. His dogged--and occasionally successful--efforts to develop my skills are directly responsible for whatever small progress I may have made as an historian. To my friends and fellow teaching assistants I extend warmest thanks for making the past two years so enjoyable. For the many hours of comradeship and mutual sympathy over the trials and tribulations of life as a teaching assistant I thank Wendy Gunderson, Sandy Unruh, Deidre Myers, Russ Overton, Peter Kraemer, and Kelly McDaniels.
    [Show full text]
  • 272 Cowcliffe Hill Road Fixby Huddersfield HD2 2NE £350,000
    272 Cowcliffe Hill Road Fixby Huddersfield HD2 2NE £350,000 Professionalism with Independence 14 St Georges Square, Huddersfield, HD1 1JF t: 01484 530361 Deceptively spacious, having been extended by the present owners the property now provides a most spacious 4 bedroom, 2 bathroom, family home. Enjoying far reaching views to the rear, the property is situated in the popular and much sought after residential area of Fixby. Located approximately 2 miles from Huddersfield town centre and a similar distance to the M62, the property provides an ideal base for those wishing to commute to the major trading centres of West Yorkshire and East Lancashire. Situated near Huddersfield golf club, the property boasts 4 good sized bedrooms, with en-suite facilities to the master bedroom and in addition to the formal living accommodation, the property is enhanced by a lower ground floor games room/gym, study and utility room. Having gas fired central heating, uPVC double glazing, security alarm system and detached single garage, the property must be viewed internally to truly appreciate the size, flexibility and position of this outstanding family home. Energy Rating: D The accommodation briefly comprises:- Dining Area 3.00m x 2.92m (9'10" x 9'7") GROUND FLOOR: Having a central heating radiator and uPVC double A uPVC entrance door with leaded and double glazed glazed window. There is spindle rail balustrade. panels gives access to the entrance hall. Entrance Hall Having a central heating radiator, built-in cloak cupboard with fixture shelving, fitted double cupboard with mirror fronted doors and access into:- Cloakroom/WC Having a 2 piece suite comprising concealed flush WC, vanity wash basin with cupboards beneath, central heating radiator and uPVC double glazed window.
    [Show full text]
  • For Publication Report To: Heywood Township Planning Committee Date
    Subject: Submitted Planning Applications Status: For Publication Report to: Heywood Township Planning Date: 7 July 2015 Committee Report of: Director of Economy and Environment Author: See individual agenda reports 1. PURPOSE OF REPORT 1.1 To provide recommendations to the Committee on planning applications or related consents submitted to the Council and requiring the consideration and/or determination of the Committee in accordance with the Council’s approved Scheme of Delegation. 1.2 To provide information on any other planning or development related matters which may affect the work of the Committee. 2. RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 Recommendations in respect of individual planning applications are as detailed in the following papers. 3. STATUTORY IMPLICATIONS 3.1 The submitted applications on this agenda are to be determined in accordance with the provisions of relevant legislation, including the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, Planning and Compensation Act 1991, Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, Planning Act 2008, Localism Act 2011 and the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015 together with any Directions and Regulations which support that legislation. 3.2 Planning law requires that applications be determined in accordance with the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. Where relevant, any such material considerations will be referred to in the report. The Development Plan 3.3 All planning applications referred to in this report have been assessed against the relevant policies and proposals of the development plan for the Borough (currently the adopted Rochdale Unitary Development Plan 2006) and any Supplementary Planning Documents or Guidance adopted by the Council.
    [Show full text]
  • CONFERENCE and EVENTS a Signature Venue for Your Event WELCOME to LEEDS UNITED HIRES REQUIRED FOOTBALL CLUB, a SIGNATURE VENUE for YOUR EVENT
    LEEDS UNITED FOOTBALL CLUB CONFERENCE AND EVENTS A signature venue for your event WELCOME TO LEEDS UNITED HIRES REQUIRED FOOTBALL CLUB, A SIGNATURE VENUE FOR YOUR EVENT. One of the UK’s leading Conference & Events venues and We can cater for: the home of Leeds United Football Club; our passion on the pitch is matched by the passion of our world class Conferences, Meetings & AGM’s Product Launches Conference & Events Team off the pitch. Gala Dinners Training At Elland Road we are able to host a With over 100 years combined Award Ceremonies Interviews wide range of events, from sell-out pop experience, our dedicated, award concerts inside the stadium, to private winning team will take care of every Christmas Parties Networking Events one-to-one business meeting - we can detail, providing support and expertise cater for your every need. throughout the planning Exhibitions Car Launches and delivery. Fashion Shows Pitch Events Private Celebrations Sporting Events To find out more please call our dedicated events team: Weddings Team Building 0871 334 1919 (OPTION 2) or email: [email protected] Asian Weddings Proms To find out more please call our dedicated events team: 0871 334 1919 (OPTION 2) or email: [email protected] 02/03 - Conference and Events The Centenary Pavilion provides one of the biggest WELCOME TO THE Conference & Events spaces in the North of England - CENTENARY PAVILION with over 2000 square metres of space. Purpose built, provides With a clear span, it’s the perfect venue exhibitions, to live music, fashion and for product launches, exhibitions and sporting events’.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Middleton Township Committee, 14
    Public Document Pack Meeting of: Middleton Township Committee Date: Thursday, 14th March, 2019 Time: 6.00 pm. Venue: Junction Library and Community Centre, Grimshaw Lane, Middleton, M24 2AA This agenda gives notice of items to be considered in private as required by Regulations 5 (4) and (5) of The Local Authorities (Executive Arrangements) (Meetings and Access to Information) (England) Regulations 2012. Item AGENDA Page No No. 1. APOLOGIES To receive any apologies for absence. 2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Members are required to declare any disclosable pecuniary, personal or personal and prejudicial interests they may have and the nature of those interests relating to items on this agenda and/or indicate if S106 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 applies to them. 3. URGENT ITEMS OF BUSINESS To determine whether there are any additional items of business which, by reason of special circumstances, the Chair decides should be considered at the meeting as a matter of urgency. 4. ITEMS FOR EXCLUSION OF PUBLIC AND PRESS To determine any items on the agenda, if any, where the public are to be excluded from the meeting. 5. OPEN FORUM Half an hour has been set aside for members of the public to raise any issues relevant to the business of the Committee and the Township. 6. METRO MONEYWISE CREDIT UNION 4 - 11 Presentation by representatives of Metro Moneywise Credit Union 7. MINUTES - MIDDLETON TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE 12 - 19 To consider the Minutes of the meeting of Middleton Township Committee held on 11th October 2018. 8. MINUTES - MIDDLETON TOWNSHIP DEVOLVED FUNDING AND 20 - 22 DEVOLVED SERVICES SUB COMMITTEE To note the Minutes of the meeting of the Middleton Township Devolved Funding and Devolved Services Sub Committee held on 13th February 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Belfield Context Plan.Pdf
    Site Context Plan The Belfield Project Rochdale, Greater Manchester Regeneration Benefits Belfield Project • Transform 37 hectares of damaged and neglected, previously developed brownfield land (DUNL PDL) in to community woodland, managed in perpetuity by the Forestry Commission • Improve 14 SOA’s in Rochdale that are within the top 5% of the National Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) through environmental change • Deliver environmental improvements on DUN land within the East Central Rochdale Housing Market Renewal Pathfinder • Contribute to changing regional and local perceptions of Rochdale • Create a zone of influence around the project area that will make it a more competitive choice for business investment • Improve and create safe, non-vehicular access routes to local businesses, schools and residential areas by creating and improving the green infrastructure into Rochdale Town Centre • Improve the visual impact of derelict land within major transport corridors in Rochdale • Contribute to the image enhancement of the strategic sphere of influence around the Kingsway Business Park and the Stanney Brook Corridor • Encourage greater participation in healthy lifestyle activities by providing and supporting health related features and activities • Contribute to Greater Manchester’s Biodiversity Action Plan (GMBAP) targets ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! " ! P ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Belfield Site ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! BELFIELD STRATEGIC LOCATION PLAN ! ! ! ! Belfield Project Strategic
    [Show full text]
  • The M621 Motorway (Speed Limit) Regulations 2000
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2000 No. 1811 ROAD TRAFFIC The M621 Motorway (Speed Limit) Regulations 2000 Made - - - - 10th July 2000 Laid before Parliament 20th July 2000 Coming into force - - 11th August 2000 The Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 17(2) and (3) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984(1), and of all other powers enabling him in that behalf, after consultation with representative organisations in accordance with section 134(2) of that Act, hereby makes the following Regulations:— Citation and Commencement 1. These Regulations may be cited as the M621 Motorway (Speed Limit) Regulations 2000 and shall come into force on 11th August 2000. Imposition of Speed Limit 2.—(1) No person shall drive any motor vehicle at a speed exceeding 50 miles per hour on the lengths of road specified in Schedule 1 to these Regulations; (2) No person shall drive any motor vehicle at a speed exceeding 40 miles per hour on the lengths of road specified in Schedule 2 to these Regulations; (3) No person shall drive any motor vehicle at a speed exceeding 30 miles per hour on the lengths of road specified in Schedule 3 to these Regulations. Revocation and Amendment 3.—(1) The Motorways Traffic (Speed Limit) Regulations 1974(2) shall be amended by the omission of paragraphs 16 to 26 in Schedule 2 to those Regulations; (2) The Motorways Traffic (M621 Motorway) (Speed Limit) Regulations 1983(3) and the Motorways Traffic (Leeds South East Urban Motorway) (Speed Limit) Regulations 1973(4) are hereby revoked.
    [Show full text]
  • R4 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    R4 bus time schedule & line map R4 Rochdale - Ladyhouse Via Milnrow View In Website Mode The R4 bus line (Rochdale - Ladyhouse Via Milnrow) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Lady House: 10:05 AM - 6:25 PM (2) Rochdale: 10:32 AM - 4:42 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest R4 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next R4 bus arriving. Direction: Lady House R4 bus Time Schedule 28 stops Lady House Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 10:05 AM - 6:25 PM Rochdale Interchange, Rochdale River Street, Rochdale Tuesday 10:05 AM - 6:25 PM Oldham Road, Rochdale Wednesday 10:05 AM - 6:25 PM Pickup Street, Rochdale Thursday 10:05 AM - 6:25 PM Chichester Street, Rochdale Friday 10:05 AM - 6:25 PM Moss Street, Newbold Saturday 10:05 AM - 6:05 PM Stamford Street, Newbold Worsley Place, Rochdale Newbold Post O∆ce, Newbold R4 bus Info Pine Street, Rochdale Direction: Lady House Stops: 28 Roseƒeld Crescent, Newbold Trip Duration: 27 min Line Summary: Rochdale Interchange, Rochdale, Palatine Street, Newbold Oldham Road, Rochdale, Chichester Street, Rochdale, Moss Street, Newbold, Stamford Street, Kingsway, Firgrove Newbold, Newbold Post O∆ce, Newbold, Roseƒeld Kingsway, Rochdale Crescent, Newbold, Palatine Street, Newbold, Kingsway, Firgrove, Hartley Street, Firgrove, Crown & Hartley Street, Firgrove Shuttle, Firgrove, Princess Road, Firgrove, Upper Hartley Street, Rochdale Stone Drive, Firgrove, Leyƒeld Road, Milnrow, The Cray, Milnrow, Tim Bobbin, Milnrow, Silver Hill, Crown & Shuttle,
    [Show full text]