DOCSLIB.ORG

Adoption Resolution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Adoption Resolution ADOPTION RESOLUTION Town of Boonsboro, Maryland RESOLUTION 97-04 WHEREAS, Article 66B of the Annotated Code of Maryland empowers local municipalities to provide for the orderly growth and development of their respective jurisdictions; AND WHEREAS, the Town of Boonsboro Mayor and Council, in conjunction with the Town of Boonsboro Planning Commission, have recently completed an update and revision of their Comprehensive Plan. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Boonsboro, Maryland that the document known as "Comprehensive Development Plan for the Town of Boonsboro, Maryland" is hereby adopted and to be placed into effect the 23th day of June, 1997. Charles. F. Kauffman, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Barbara Rodenhiser, Town Clerk This Comprehensive Development Plan for the Town of Boonsboro is designed to guide the physical development of the Town of Boonsboro pursuant to the provisions of Article 66B of the Annotated Code of Maryland. The Plan is recommended to the Mayor and Town Council for adoption by resolution of the Boonsboro Planning Commission on May 27, 1997 after a duly advertised public hearing conducted on May 20, 1997. Robert L. Snyder, Chairman Boonsboro Planning Commission ATTEST: Richard W. Gross, Secretary COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE TOWN OF BOONSBORO, MARYLAND BOONSBORO PLANNING COMMISSION and the BOONSBORO MAYOR AND COUNCIL TOWN OF BOONSBORO Charles F. Kauffman, Jr., Mayor Howard W. Long, Assistant Mayor Kevin M. Chambers Richard W. Gross Raymond D. Grove Richard E. Hawkins, Sr. Gene W. Smith BOONSBORO MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION Robert L. Snyder, Chairman David E. Ambrose, Vice Chairman Richard W. Gross, Council Representative Julie S. Green Jeffery B. Harrison Peggy E. Mark Robert L. Wetzel Eldon A. Jones, Town Manager C. Richard Grimm, Zoning Administrator Technical Assistance Provided by the WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Robert C. Arch, Director James P. Brittain, Associate Planner - Town Planner Jennifer L. Diehl, Assistant Planner - GIS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Preface........................................................................................................................................ i Part I Background Studies Population.......................................................................................................................... 1 Natural Environment....................................................................................................... 13 Land Use.......................................................................................................................... 22 Transportation ................................................................................................................. 37 Community Facilities...................................................................................................... 46 Economy.......................................................................................................................... 62 Downtown Business District .......................................................................................... 66 Part II Comprehensive Plan Land Use & Future Growth ............................................................................................ 70 Transportation ................................................................................................................. 92 Community Facilities.................................................................................................... 104 Economy........................................................................................................................ 111 List of Maps Map 1 Sensitive Areas ........................................................................................................ 18A Map 2 Land Use 1996 ......................................................................................................... 22A Map 3 Zoning Map .............................................................................................................. 22B Map 4 Town Study Areas.................................................................................................... 22C Map 5 Town Growth Area Boundaries............................................................................... 30A Map 6 Community Facilities............................................................................................... 46A Map 7 Generalized Land Use.............................................................................................. 73A Map 8 TGA Generalized Land Use .................................................................................... 73B Map 9 TGA Roads - Functional Classification .................................................................. 93A PREFACE The Boonsboro Comprehensive Plan was last updated in 1990-1991 and adopted by the Mayor and Council on August 5, 1991. The Maryland Office of Planning was requested to help the Planning Commission and Town Council update its 1975 Plan due to growth-related issues and problems facing the Town in the near future. The 1996-97 Update of the Boonsboro Comprehensive Plan was mandated via the Maryland Economic Growth, Resource Protection and Planning Act of 1992 henceforth referred to as the 'Planning Act of 1992'. The Town of Boonsboro receives its authority and guidance for planning and zoning from the State of Maryland through enabling legislation know as Article 66B. Article 66B specifies areas that a comprehensive plan should address to provide for orderly and economical growth of a community. The Planning Act of 1992 added several new requirements for local government comprehensive plans. The new requirements of Article 66B are as follows: Section 3.05(a)(1)(iii) The transportation plan element shall also provide for bicycle and pedestrian access and travelways. An estimate of the probable utilization of any proposed improvements shall be included. Section 3.05(a)(1)(vi) 1. Streamlined review of applications for development, including permit review and subdivision plat review within the areas designated for growth in the plan; 2. The use of flexible development regulations to promote innovative and cost-saving site design and protect the environment; and 3. Economic development in areas designated for growth in the plan through the use of innovative techniques. Section 3.05(a)(1)(viii) A Sensitive Area element that contains goals, objectives, principles, policies, and standards designed to protect, from the adverse effects of development, sensitive areas, including the following: 1. Streams and their buffers; 2. 100-Year Floodplains; 3. Habitats of Threatened and endangered Species; and 4. Steep slopes Section 3.05(a)(2) The sensitive areas element adopted under paragraph (1)(viii) of this subsection may also include other areas in need of special protection, as determined in the local plan. Section 3.06(b) In addition to the requirements of subsection (a) of this section, the Commission shall implement the following "Visions" through the plan described in 3.05 of the Article: -i- 1. Development is concentrated in suitable area; 2. Sensitive areas are protected; 3. In rural areas, growth is directed to existing population centers and resource areas are protected; 4. Stewardship of the Chesapeake Bay and the Land is a universal ethic; 5. Conservation of resources, including a reduction in resource consumption, is practiced; 6. To assure the achievement of paragraphs (1) through (5) of this subsection, economic growth is encouraged and regulatory mechanisms are streamlined; and 7. Funding mechanisms are addressed to achieve these visions. Section 3.06(c) 1. Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection, the authority to adopt regulations concerning the implementation of subsection (B) of the section in a plan shall be vested solely in the legislative Body of the jurisdiction that has adopted the plan. 2. This subsection does not limit the Office of Planning, the State Economic Growth, Resource Protection, and Planning Commission, or any subcommittee of the Commission, from exercising any authority granted under the State Finance and Procurement Article. In addition to addressing the State mandates, the 1996-97 Update provides the Town with an opportunity to update background data (Part I) and to make revisions and additions to the goals, objectives, and recommendations to the Comprehensive Plan (Part II) outlined in the 1991 Plan. The update to Part I and II of the Plan, other than those required by the Planning Act of 1992, are the result of reflecting upon accomplishments by the public and private sector and the re-evaluation of the Town's goals resulting from changes in philosophy and environs that have occurred over the past five years. Changes in most of the goals of the Town's comprehensive plan will be subtle in many instances as the Visions are not a new concept. The inclusion of the Visions offers an opportunity to enhance the Plan in areas previously only touched upon in a broad sense. HISTORICAL INFLUENCE PAST AND PRESENT Boonsboro is a town steeped in history and yet stalked by the future. This historic old Western Maryland municipality began as a small settlement in the late 1700's and was incorporated 1831. The completion of the National Pike (now U.S. 40 Alternate) to Boonsboro in 1810 at the terminus of Shepherdstown Pike (now Maryland Route 34) gave the Town the beginnings of a regional -ii- accessibility that made it a major commercial center. Other major roads were
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’S Civil War Battlefields
    U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service American Battlefield Protection Program Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields State of Maryland Washington, DC January 2010 Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields State of Maryland U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service American Battlefield Protection Program Washington, DC January 2010 Authority The American Battlefield Protection Program Act of 1996, as amended by the Civil War Battlefield Preservation Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-359, 111 Stat. 3016, 17 December 2002), directs the Secretary of the Interior to update the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission (CWSAC) Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields. Acknowledgments NPS Project Team Paul Hawke, Project Leader; Kathleen Madigan, Survey Coordinator; Tanya Gossett and January Ruck, Reporting; Matthew Borders, Historian; Kristie Kendall, Program Assistant. Battlefield Surveyor(s) Lisa Rupple, American Battlefield Protection Program Respondents Ted Alexander and John Howard, Antietam National Battlefield; C. Casey Reese and Pamela Underhill, Appalachian National Scenic Trail; Susan Frye, Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park; Kathy Robertson, Civil War Preservation Trust; John Nelson, Hager House Museum; Joy Beasley, Cathy Beeler, Todd Stanton, and Susan Trail, Monocacy National Battlefield; Robert Bailey and Al Preston, South Mountain Battlefield State Park. Cover: View of the sunken
    [Show full text]
  • Md Cracker Barrel 2005.Pdf
    • Bird's-Eye View Of Hagerstown's Golden Years • • Memories Of Washington County's "Town That Was" • MARYLAND l$2.50 • Sentinel of Washington County's Heritage • Feb./March 2005 P oi C> H n H c V Meet Us at the Friendly MARYLAND Cracker Barrel Bi-Monthly! Gather around the pot-bellied stove Grader Bar rel and the checkerboard with a barrel of Our 33rd year common crackers within easy reach and Volume 33 -- No. 4 enjoy the Maryland Cracker Barrel. Since June of 1971 this magazine has Published bi-monthly by been a gathering place for folks interested MARYLAND CRACKER in preserving the heritage of Washington BARREL, INC. 7749 Fairplay Road County. Boonsboro, MD 21713-2322 It is our goal to present the story of the (301)582-3885 individuals who have striven to give this region a heritage worthy of preservation. Editor and Publisher Frank Woodring Associate Editor Suanne Woodring Attention: Former Fairchild Employees Chad Woodring This summer we plan to focus on Fairchild Aircraft in Washing­ Donald Dayhoff ton County. We would appreciate if you would submit your fa­ Janet Dayhoff vorite memory of your association with Fairchild by June 1. Fred Kuhn Please include your name, address, department, and number of Bonnie Kuhn years spent with Fairchild. Bob Waring Betty Waring Contributing Writers Coming Richard Clem Jessie Robinette Spring of 2005 Blair Williamson Order Prior to March 1 Printed by to Receive Oak Printing, Inc. Pre-Publication Special 952 Frederick Street Hagerstown, MD 21740 $19.99 (Includes Tax and Shipping) Subscription Rate: $13.65 per year Orders Received Maryland Cracker Barrel After March 1 7749 Fairplay Road $22.99 Boonsboro, MD 21713 301-582-3885 Maryland Cracker Barrel 7749 Fairplay Road [email protected] Boonsboro, MD 21713 Images of America 301-582-3885 FRONT COVER: The photo PEN MAR depicts the east side of the first Images of America, PEN MAR contains 128 pages with more than block of North Potomac Street 200 pictures of historic Pen Mar Park along with the Western in Hagerstown.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification
    F-687 Nov-08-2004 14:45 From-ANTI RM 4 LE 3014320313 T-911 P.002 / .. - UNITED STATtS DtPAjtTMHNTOFTHb INTtKIOR FOR NFS USE ONLY NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ,ATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES RECEIVED / INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM DATE ENTERED FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS_____ NAME HISTORIC An tier am National Battlefield AND/OR COMMON " • • '• ' [LOCATION STREET ft NUMBER P. 0. Box 158 —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Sharsburg VICINITY OF Sixth STATE m " „ COUNTY Maryland B Washington CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE ^DISTRICT _PUBUC JKOCCUPIED JXAGRICULTUHE —MUSEUM —BUILDINGIS) —PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL JKPARK .STRUCTURE 2BOTH .WORK IN PROGRESS .EDUCATIONAL ^PRIVATE RESIDENCE ^.SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE .ENTERTAINMENT ^RELIGIOUS —OBJECT JCIN PROCESS _~YE5: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT ^SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED JSYES: UNRESTRICTED .INDUSTRIAL .TRANSPORTATION —MILITARY MOTHER: AGENCY REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS: i National Capital Beginn/Mat-'fonal Park STREET & NUMBER 1100 Ohio Drive, S.W. CITY. TOWN, . STATE Washington, D.C,_20242 LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY Of DEEO&ETC. Waahingt(m County STREET & NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE Hageretown, Maryland H REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Partial representation lo State Historic Sites Survey OATE .FEDERAL &STATE —COUNTY _LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Maryland Historic Trust, 21 State Circle CITY. TOWN STATE Awtapolls, Maryland Nov-08-Z004 14:45 From-ANT I RM & LE 3014320313 T-911 P.003/009 F-687 H DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT ^DETERIORATED _UN ALTER ED X.GOOO _RUINS JLALTERED —FAIR __UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL OF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Antietam National Battlefield is located near the Maryland hank, of the Potomac River and along Antietam Creek north and east of the village of Sharpsburg, Maryland.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Lights & Lore Media
    Media Kit Table of Contents About the Heart of the Civil War Heritage Area ................................................................................. 3 About this Media Kit ......................................................................................................................... 4 Winter Lights & Lore: Selected Events ............................................................................................... 5 Memorial Illumination ................................................................................................................................5 Newcomer House Illumination ...................................................................................................................5 Captain Flagg’s US Quartermaster City, 1864: Prospects of Peace ................................................................5 Civil War Christmas in Shepherdstown ........................................................................................................6 Battle of Shepherdstown Illumination .........................................................................................................6 Civil War Encampment ...............................................................................................................................7 Traditional Village Christmas ......................................................................................................................7 While Visions of Sugar Plums Danced in Their Heads ...................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • America's Natural Nuclear Bunkers
    America’s Natural Nuclear Bunkers 1 America’s Natural Nuclear Bunkers Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................... 10 Alabama .............................................................................................................. 12 Alabama Caves .................................................................................................. 13 Alabama Mines ................................................................................................. 16 Alabama Tunnels .............................................................................................. 16 Alaska ................................................................................................................. 18 Alaska Caves ..................................................................................................... 19 Alaska Mines ............................................................................................... 19 Arizona ............................................................................................................... 24 Arizona Caves ................................................................................................... 25 Arizona Mines ................................................................................................... 26 Arkansas ............................................................................................................ 28 Arkansas Caves ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Highway Bridges in Maryland: 1631-1960: Historic Context Report
    HISTORIC HIGHWAY BRIDGES IN MARYLAND: 1631-1960: HISTORIC CONTEXT REPORT Prepared for: Maryland State Highway Administration Maryland State Department of Transportation 707 North Calvert Street Baltimore, Maryland 21202 Prepared by: P.A.C. Spero & Company 40 West Chesapeake Avenue, Suite 412 Baltimore, Maryland 21204 and Louis Berger & Associates 1001 East Broad Street, Suite 220 Richmond, Virginia 23219 July 1995 Revised October 1995 Acknowledgements "Historic Highway Bridges in Maryland: 1631-1960: Historic Context Report" has been prepared with the generous assistance of the Maryland Department of Transportation, State Highway Administration's Environmental Management Section and Bridge Development Division, and the historic and cultural resources staff of the Maryland Historical Trust. The preparers of this report would like to thank Cynthia Simpson, Rita Suffness, and Bruce Grey of the State Highway Administration Environmental Management Section, and Jim Gatley, Alonzo Corley, and Chris Barth of the State Highway Administration Bridge Development Division for their aid in providing access to key research materials. Thanks are also extended to Ron Andrews, Beth Hannold, Bill Pencek, Mary Louise de Sarran, and Barbara Shepard--all of the staff of the Maryland Historical Trust, and to the members of the Advisory Committee appointed to review this report. In addition we extend special appreciation to Rita Suffness, Architectural/Bridge Historian for the Maryland State Highway Administration, for providing us with numerous background materials, analyses, research papers, histories, and a draft historic bridge context report which she authored, for use in preparing this report. The final report was prepared by P.A.C. Spero & Company. Research, analysis, graphics preparation, and report writing were conducted by Paula Spero, Michael Reis, James DuSel, Kate Elliot, Laura Landefeld, and Deborah Scherkoske of P.A.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-2026 Capital Improvement Plan
    Fiscal Year 2017 Ten Year Capital Improvement Plan Washington County, Maryland Table of Contents Table of Contents Page Introduction County Commissioners of Washington County ................................................................................ 1 Vision and Mission Statement .......................................................................................................... 3 Table of Organization ..................................................................................................................... 5 Community Profile ......................................................................................................................... 7 Capital Improvement Plan Development Capital Improvement Program ....................................................................................................... 15 Capital Improvement Plan Process ................................................................................................ 15 Components of the Capital Program .............................................................................................. 16 Capital Project Definition .............................................................................................. 16 Capital Project Priority Ranking System .......................................................................... 16 Capital Improvement Plan Funding Sources ................................................................... 18 Fiscal Year 2017 Overview FY17 Capital Improvement Budget Overview .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WA-I-042 Ralph B. Wyand Farm (Funk Farm, Beaver Creek Estates)
    WA-I-042 Ralph B. Wyand Farm (Funk Farm, Beaver Creek Estates) Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 03-21-2013 Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties Addendum MIHP Number: WA-I-042 Property Name: Ralph B. Wyand (Funk Farm, Beaver Creek Estates) Property Address: 10702 Mapleville Road (MD-66) Smithsburg, Maryland Survey Date: April 2007 This Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties (MIHP) Addendum was prepared in accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) negotiated among H.B. Mellott Estate, Inc., the Water Management Administration Mining Program Maryland Department of the Environment, and the Maryland Historical Trust. A stipulation of the MOA required that an MIHP Addendum be prepared for each of the 14 properties nearby to the John Lung Farmstead (WA-II-149), which have a history or potential significance similar to the John Lung Farmstead.
    [Show full text]
  • National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory Newcomer
    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 2012 Newcomer Farmstead Antietam National Battlefield Table of Contents Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Concurrence Status Geographic Information and Location Map Management Information National Register Information Chronology & Physical History Analysis & Evaluation of Integrity Condition Treatment Bibliography & Supplemental Information Newcomer Farmstead Antietam National Battlefield Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Inventory Summary The Cultural Landscapes Inventory Overview: CLI General Information: Purpose and Goals of the CLI The Cultural Landscapes Inventory (CLI) is an evaluated inventory of all significant landscapes in units of the national park system in which the National Park Service has, or plans to acquire any enforceable legal interest. Landscapes documented through the CLI are those that individually meet criteria set forth in the National Register of Historic Places such as historic sites, historic designed landscapes, and historic vernacular landscapes or those that are contributing elements of properties that meet the criteria. In addition, landscapes that are managed as cultural resources because of law, policy, or decisions reached through the park planning process even though they do not meet the National Register criteria, are also included in the CLI. The CLI serves three major purposes. First, it provides the means to describe cultural landscapes on an individual or collective basis at the park, regional, or service-wide level. Secondly, it provides a platform to share information about cultural landscapes across programmatic areas and concerns and to integrate related data about these resources into park management. Thirdly, it provides an analytical tool to judge accomplishment and accountability. The legislative, regulatory, and policy direction for conducting the CLI include: National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (16 USC 470h-2(a)(1)).
    [Show full text]
  • WA-II-1145 Keedysville Historic District
    WA-II-1145 Keedysville Historic District Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 03-12-2004 NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct.1990) United States Department of the Interior -1tional Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "NIA" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions.
    [Show full text]
  • Porch Program” Series to Begin at Newcomer House in April
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Date: March 29, 2016 Contact: Rachel Nichols, Newcomer House Manager: [email protected] Web: www.heartofthecivilwar.org New “Porch Program” Series to Begin at Newcomer House in April Keedysville, MD – The Heart of the Civil War Heritage Area (HCWHA) will begin a new series of monthly public programs at the Newcomer House, HCWHA’s Exhibit & Visitor Center at Antietam National Battlefield, in April. These programs will be free and family-friendly, taking place on the porch of the historic house if weather permits. The first three programs of the 2016 season will cover diverse topics including music of the Civil War era, the role of women at Antietam, and fostering a love for history across generations. Programs taking place July-December are currently under development. April 23: Songs and Stories of the Civil War (11:00 AM, 1:30 PM & 4:00 PM) Through period songs, excerpts from actual letters, and anecdotes both humorous and poignant, Matthew Dodd takes listeners back in time to feel what it was like to be a soldier, civilian, loved-one-at-home or escaped slave in the Civil War era. Dodd will bypass the stories of the generals and the battle movements and concentrate on the feelings of individuals on the home front and seeking freedom. Dodd will play acoustic guitar, harmonica, banjo and mandolin in an informal, story circle setting. May 7: Women of Antietam (11:30 AM and 1:30 PM) Civil War medicine expert Betsy Estilow will discuss the role of nurses and other women at the September 1862 Battle of Antietam on the porch of the Newcomer House.
    [Show full text]
  • WA-Mt. Aetna.Pdf
    Phase II and Phase III Project Cover Sheet All information contained within the individual site database and inventory sheets is solely the work of the researchers and authors noted below. The data provided has been culled from the original site reports noted below and in many cases has been lifted directly from them with little or no editing. The database and inventory sheets are meant to serve as a synopsis of the report findings and a finding aid and are not intended to replace or republish the research of the authors noted below. REPORT INFORMATION: Research Firm/Institutution: 2005 Lowthert, W., A.L. Fehr, A.B. Markell, and M.R. Williams R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. Phase I Archeological Survey of the Maryland Route 66 and Mt. Aetna Road Roundabout 241 E. Fourth Street, Suite 100 and Phase III Data Recovery Investigations at Site 18WA487, Washington County, Maryland. Frederick, MD 21701 Submitted to the Maryland State Highway Administration Library ID No: 97002123 Catalog/Shelving ID: WA 128 Sites examined: 18WA487 NRHP Eligible: Y http://apps.planninJustification Project Details: Phase I X Project Justification: Project Objectives: The archeological investigations were conducted in anticipation of Phase I/II Phase II X the proposed construction of a traffic circle at the intersection of -Identify archeological resources within the project’s Area of Route 66 and Mt. Aetna Roads in Washington County, Maryland. Potential Effects (APE). Phase III X One multi-component archeological site (18WA487) was identified during the Phase I/II stage and recommended for Phase III data -Locate the boundaries of all identified sites.
    [Show full text]