DOCSLIB.ORG

US Ecology Nevada – Customer Audit Handbook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
US Ecology Nevada – Customer Audit Handbook CUSTOMER AUDIT HANDBOOK Operations Sales/Marketing Dan Church, General Manager Jim Hubbard, Sales Manager 800.239.3943 ext. 194118 800.959.8601 [email protected] [email protected] Bryan Greager, Operations Manager Jeremy Rosenfeld, Regional Sales Representative 800.239.3943 ext. 194103 858.231.3241 [email protected] [email protected] Stephanie Kranz, Western Environmental Austin Crone, Regional Sales Representative Program Manager 208.489.9061 208.506.7336 [email protected] [email protected] Kim Swanson, Western Regional Customer Shaun Russell, Regional Sales Representative Service Manager 323.607.2355 208.319.1639 [email protected] [email protected] Hwy 95, 11 Miles South of Beatty, Beatty, NV 89003 800.239.3943 775.553.2203 US Ecology, Beatty, Nevada – Customer Audit Handbook INTRODUCTION This customer audit handbook provides environmental information for current and potential customers of the US Ecology Nevada facility in Beatty, Nevada. Many customers require an audit handbook to provide an orientation to the company, the facility, and its specific permitted features. This handbook provides useful information in this regard, although customers may have additional questions. Please contact US Ecology Nevada for information on items not covered in this document. To facilitate communication, the document is formatted electronically to allow download from the company’s web page (http://www.usecology.com). Due to the large number of pages, the facility’s hazardous waste permits and other permits are available as separate pdf files on the web page. Customer contract forms, waste profile forms, and other documents may also be downloaded from the web page. USEN Audit Package 2021 Updated May 2021 Page 1 US Ecology, Beatty, Nevada – Customer Audit Handbook TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Location .................................................................................................................................. 4 2. General Facility Description ................................................................................................. 4 3. Site History ............................................................................................................................. 4 4. Health and Safety Program, and Training .......................................................................... 5 5. Geography and Climate ........................................................................................................ 6 6. Geology ................................................................................................................................... 6 6.1 Hydrogeology .................................................................................................................. 7 7. Site Design Features .............................................................................................................. 8 7.1 Treatment Systems ......................................................................................................... 8 7.2 Landfills ........................................................................................................................ 10 7.3 Containers and Tanks .................................................................................................. 11 8. Laboratory ........................................................................................................................... 12 9. Recycling Capabilities ......................................................................................................... 13 9.1 Aerosol Can Recycling ................................................................................................. 13 9.2 Container Re-Use Management .................................................................................. 13 10. Waste Treatment Capabilities ............................................................................................ 13 10.1 Chemical Stabilization ................................................................................................. 13 10.2 Chemical Fixation (Oxidation/Reduction) ................................................................. 14 10.3 Debris Management ..................................................................................................... 14 10.4 Processing Containerized Waste ................................................................................. 15 10.5 Processing Bulk Wastes ............................................................................................... 15 11. Waste Acceptance Procedures ............................................................................................ 15 11.1 Pre-Acceptance Protocol.............................................................................................. 16 11.2 WP Terms and Conditions and Contract Addendums and Amendments .............. 17 11.3 Approval Letters .......................................................................................................... 17 11.4 Waste Receipt Protocol ................................................................................................ 17 11.5 Post Treatment Testing Requirements ....................................................................... 17 11.6 Procedures for PCB Wastes ........................................................................................ 18 12. Groundwater Monitoring ................................................................................................... 18 13. Surface Water Controls ...................................................................................................... 19 14. Air Quality Controls ............................................................................................................ 20 15. Closure/Post-Closure ........................................................................................................... 20 USEN Audit Package 2021 Updated May 2021 Page 2 US Ecology, Beatty, Nevada – Customer Audit Handbook LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location Map ........................................................................................................... 4 Figure 2 Generalized Site Stratigraphy .......................................................................................... 7 Figure 3 PCB Transfer Operations ................................................................................................ 8 Figure 4 Outdoor Waste Stabilization............................................................................................ 9 Figure 5 Schematic of Trench 12 and 13 Design ......................................................................... 10 Figure 6 Land Disposal Operations, beginning of Trench 13 ...................................................... 11 Figure 7 Container Storage .......................................................................................................... 12 Referenced Permits and Plans 1. RCRA Permit 2. RCRA Permit: Contingency Plan 3. RCRA Permit: Waste Analysis Plan 4. RCRA Permit: Scheduled Closure Plan 5. RCRA Permit: Post-Closure Care Plan 6. TSCA Approval 7. Class II Air Quality Operating Air Permit 8. Industrial Storm Water Permit 9. Storm Water Pollution Plan 10. Health and Safety Plan 11. Laboratory Chemical Hygiene Plan USEN Audit Package 2021 Updated May 2021 Page 3 US Ecology, Beatty, Nevada – Customer Audit Handbook US ECOLOGY NEVADA DETAILS 1. Location US Ecology Nevada (USEN) is located in Nye County, Nevada, approximately 11 miles south of Beatty, Nevada, in the Amargosa Desert (Latitude - 36° 46’ 9”, Longitude - 116° 41” 23”). See Figure 1. The Amargosa Desert is in the northern Mojave Desert separated from Death Valley by the Amargosa Range and is one of the driest regions in the United States, with an average annual rainfall of about four inches. 2. General Facility Description The USEN hazardous waste management facility site is owned by the State of Nevada and operated by USEN. The facility covers approximately 480 acres, and the surrounding land is federally owned and administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) as rangeland. The topography in the immediate Figure 1 Site Location Map area is flat and extends across the desert for long distances to bordering mountain ranges, except on the east where the terrain rises gently to mountain ranges about three miles away. Death Valley is approximately 25 miles by air to the west. There are no parks, recreation areas or landmarks from which the facility is visible. The facility is not located on or adjacent to Indian Lands. Wastes accepted at the facility include RCRA hazardous wastes identified in 40 CFR Part 261, polychlorinated biphenyl waste regulated under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), industrial wastes, state-regulated wastes, and other non-hazardous wastes. The RCRA Part A lists the acceptable wastes and anticipated annual quantities. Wastes identified in the Part A include on-site generated waste managed at the facility. In addition to the active hazardous waste landfill unit (Trench 13), USEN operates six container management units and eleven tank management units. Wastes requiring treatment are stabilized or oxidized in indoor or outdoor stabilization tanks prior to disposal. The hazardous waste management areas are surrounded by chain link fence, with visible warning signs, and topped with three strands of barbed wire. 3. Site History Operations at the site began in October 1962 when
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DOCKETED 1516 Ninth Street 09-RENEW EO-1 Sacramento, CA 95814-5512 TN 75171 [email protected] FEB 23 2015
    PO Box 63 Shoshone, CA 92384 760.852.4339 www.amargosaconservancy.org February 23, 2015 California Energy Commission California Energy Commission Dockets Office, MS-4 Docket No. 09-RENEW EO-01 DOCKETED 1516 Ninth Street 09-RENEW EO-1 Sacramento, CA 95814-5512 TN 75171 [email protected] FEB 23 2015 Re: The DRECP and the Amargosa Watershed On behalf of the members and Board of Directors of the Amargosa Conservancy, please accept our comments herein on the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan. Please refer to our second comment letter, dated February 23, 2015, for our comments on National Conservation Lands and Special Recreation Management Areas. Please also refer to the letter from Kevin Emmerich and Laura Cunningham, dated January 30, 2015, which the Amargosa Conservancy is signatory to. This letter details the need for a new program alternative in the DRECP which properly evaluates rooftop solar. To sum the key points of this letter: No groundwater pumping should be permissible in the Amargosa Watershed, including Charleston View, Silurian Valley, and Stewart Valley. Such activities would cause direct mortality of endangered species such as the Amargosa vole. USFWS take permits should be required for any groundwater pumping, and such permits should not be issued given the precarious conservation status of the vole. No mitigation can adequately compensate the ecosystem for the damage done by groundwater withdrawal. Retirement of water rights is not sufficient, and monitoring and triggering schemes are completely inadequate to protect the resources of the Amargosa Wild and Scenic River. Due to numerous biological, cultural, and social resource conflicts, Charleston View is not an appropriate place for utility-scale solar, should not be designated as a Development Focus Area (DFA).
    [Show full text]
  • California State University, Northridge
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE THE CHANGING FACE OF TOURISM IN DEATH VALLEY A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Arts in Geography By Tina White December 2013 The thesis of Tina White is approved: ____________________________________ _____________________ Ronald Davidson, Ph.D. Date ____________________________________ _____________________ Edward Jackiewicz, Ph.D. Date ____________________________________ _____________________ Julie E. Laity, Ph.D., Chair Date California State University, Northridge ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I acknowledge, and most heartily thank, the CSUN faculty members who have continuously supported and encouraged me through the (too) many years I have spent working towards this degree. First and foremost, I am grateful for and to my thesis advisor, Professor Julie Laity, who has taught me about physical geography and academic success in the classroom, in the field, and during our talks in her office. And, of course, there is she from whom I have learned so much geomorphology and with whom I have had so much fun in the field: Professor Amalie Orme. To my thesis committee members Ron Davidson and Ed Jackiewicz, thank you so much for your time and assistance; I appreciate your expertise and input. Further, I have been fortunate to have taken classes with and/or had the opportunity to learn informally from the entire CSUN Geography Department faculty teaching from 1997 through the present at one time or another, as well as from some great folks in the CSUN Geology Department. I have learned something from each and every one of you, and will be eternally grateful. I also want to thank multiple employees at Death Valley National Park, in particular Terry Baldino and Alex Cabana and their numerous staff members, who took the time to speak with me about this topic; their input was invaluable and their insights intriguing.
    [Show full text]
  • T)Eath %Jaluy NATIONAL MONUMENT
    T)eath %JalUy NATIONAL MONUMENT CALIFORNIA NEVADA UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary DEATH VALLEY NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • Conrad L. Wirth, Director NATIONAL MONUMENT Contents Open all year • Regular season, October IS to May IS CLOUD FLAMES (Photo by FLOYD B. EVANS, A.P.S.A.) Cover BEFORE THE WHITE MAN CAME 3 The National Park System, of which Death Valley National Monument THE HISTORICAL DRAMA 4 is a unit, is dedicated to the conservation of America's scenic, scientific, TALES WRITTEN IN ROCK AND LANDSCAPE 5 and historic heritage for the benefit and enjoyment of the people. DESERT WILDLIFE . 10 DESERT PLANT LIFE 11 INTERPRETIVE SERVICES 12 DEATH VALLEY National Monument, other mountain in the 48 States. WHAT TO SEE AND DO WHILE IN THE MONUMENT 12 embracing nearly 2 million acres of primi­ The maximum air temperature of 134° F. HOW TO REACH DEATH VALLEY 13 tive unspoiled desert country, was estab­ in the shade recorded in Death Valley was lished by Presidential proclamation on a world record until 1922 when 136.4° F. MONUMENT SEASON 14 February 11, 1933. Famed as a scene of was reported from Azizia, Tripoli. Tempera­ WHAT TO WEAR 14 suffering in the gold-rush drama of 1849, tures near Badwater have probably been Death Valley has long been known to ACCOMMODATIONS 14 even hotter. These extreme temperatures scientist and layman alike as a region rich are known only during the summer ADMINISTRATION 15 in scientific and human interest. Its dis­ months. PLEASE HELP PROTECT THIS MONUMENT 15 tinctive types of scenery, its geological Through the winter season, from late phenomena, flora, fauna, and climate are October until May, the climate is usually unique.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimated Potentiometric Surface of the Death Valley Regional Groundwater Flow System, Nevada and California by Michael T
    U.S. Department of the Interior Prepared in cooperation with the Scientific Investigations Report 2016-5150 U.S. Geological Survey Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Sheet 1 (Interagency Agreement DE–AI52–01NV13944), and Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (Interagency Agreement DE–AI28–02RW12167), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Nye County, Nevada 650000 115° 117° 550000 116° 600000 118° 450000 500000 San Antonio Mts Monte Cristo Range Monitor Range Big Smokey Stone Valley Cabin Grant Range Valley Railroad 1600 Tonopah Valley Quinn Canyon Range Reveille Range 38° 38° Lincoln County Reveille Valley 4200000 4200000 Esmeralda County 1700 1500 1800 1500 Cactus Penoyer Valley Goldfield 00 00 16 Flat 16 (Sand Spring Worthington Range Hill Valley) Nye County 1600 Cactus Range Clayton Valley Stonewall Montezuma Range Flat Kawich Range Timpahute Range Hiko Range Kawich Fish Lake Valley 1700 1500 Gold Valley North Pahranagat Range 1600 Flat Palmetto Mts 1400 Stonewall 1400 4150000 4150000 1500 Mtn 1600 1500 East Pahranagat Range Pahranagat Range 1300 Magruder Mtn Tikaboo Valley Belted Range EmigrantValley Groom Range Last Chance Range 1500 Slate Ridge 1200 1300 Eureka Valley 1200 Pahute 1100 Black Mesa 1100 Mtn 1000 Gold Rainier Eleana 1500 Range Mtn Stonewall Mesa 1000 White Mts Pass Desert Range 900 Halfpint Range Shoshone Yucca 800 Grapevine Mts Flat 1300 Timber Mtn 1500 Sarcobatus Mtn 700 4100000 4100000 1700 Flat 37° 37° 1400 Desert 1600 Valley
    [Show full text]
  • Some Desert Watering Places
    DEPAETMENT OF THE INTEEIOE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DiRECTOK WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 224 SOME DESERT WATERING PLACES IN SOUTHEASTEEN CALIFORNIA AND SOUTHWESTERN NEVADA BY WALTER C. MENDENHALL WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1909 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR WATER-SUPPLY PAPEK 224 SOME DESERT WATERING PLACES IN SOUTHEASTEEN CALIFOKNIA AND SOUTHWESTEKN NEVADA BY WALTER C. MENDENHALL WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1909 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction______________________________________ 5 Area considered_________________________________ 5 Mineral resources and industrial developments______________ . 6 Sources of data__________________________________ 7 Physical features__________________________________ 8 General character of the region______________________ 8 Death Valley basin__________________________________ 9 Soda Lake_____________________________________ 30 Salton Sink______________________________________ 10 A great trough_______________________________ 30 Fault lines__________________.____ ______________ 11 Climate______________________. ____ ______________ 11 Water supply_________ _________________________ 13 Origin_________________________________________ 13 Rivers______________________________________ 13 Springs__________________________________________ 15 Finding water_______________________________ 16 Camping places_______________________________ 16 Mountain springs and tanks______________________ 17 Dry lakes____________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • EICHBAUM TOLL ROAD HISTORIC CONTEXT REPORT Towne Pass Curve Correction Project Inyo County, California 09-INY 190, PM 69.2/69.8 EA 09-35320 Contract No
    EICHBAUM TOLL ROAD HISTORIC CONTEXT REPORT Towne Pass Curve Correction Project Inyo County, California 09-INY 190, PM 69.2/69.8 EA 09-35320 Contract No. 06A2138 Project ID: 09-1200-0007 Prepared for: Prepared by: Trevor Pratt Steven J. “Mel” Melvin, Architectural Historian Caltrans District 9 Bryan Larson, Partner / Architectural Historian 500 South Main Street JRP Historical Consulting, LLC Bishop, CA 93514 2850 Spafford Street Davis, CA 95618 June 2018 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 2. RESEARCH METHODS ....................................................................................................... 1 3. DESCRIPTION OF RESOURCE........................................................................................... 1 4. HISTORIC CONTEXT .......................................................................................................... 2 4.1 Tourism and Recreation ................................................................................................ 2 4.2 Transportation ............................................................................................................... 6 4.2.1 Toll Roads ................................................................................................................. 6 4.2.2 Development of Roads in the Death Valley Region ................................................. 7 4.3 History of the Eichbaum Toll Road ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Amphibians and Reptiles at Death Valley National Park
    Inventory of Amphibians and Reptiles at Death Valley National Park Final Report Permit # DEVA-2003-SCI-0010 (amphibians) and DEVA-2002-SCI-0010 (reptiles) Accession # DEVA- 2493 (amphibians) and DEVA-2453 (reptiles) Trevor B. Persons and Erika M. Nowak Common Chuckwalla in Greenwater Canyon, Death Valley National Park (TBP photo). USGS Southwest Biological Science Center Colorado Plateau Research Station Box 5614, Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona 86011 May 2006 Death Valley Amphibians and Reptiles_____________________________________________________ ABSTRACT As part of the National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring Program in the Mojave Network, we conducted an inventory of amphibians and reptiles at Death Valley National Park in 2002- 2004. Objectives for this inventory were to: 1) Inventory and document the occurrence of reptile and amphibian species occurring at DEVA, primarily within priority sampling areas, with the goal of documenting at least 90% of the species present; 2) document (through collection or museum specimen and literature review) one voucher specimen for each species identified; 3) provide a GIS-referenced list of sensitive species that are federally or state listed, rare, or worthy of special consideration that occur within priority sampling locations; 4) describe park-wide distribution of federally- or state-listed, rare, or special concern species; 5) enter all species data into the National Park Service NPSpecies database; and 6) provide all deliverables as outlined in the Mojave Network Biological Inventory Study Plan. Methods included daytime and nighttime visual encounter surveys, road driving, and pitfall trapping. Survey effort was concentrated in predetermined priority sampling areas, as well as in areas with a high potential for detecting undocumented species.
    [Show full text]
  • Equestrian Trails, Inc. Offi Cial Publication of Equestrian Trails, Inc
    Equestrian Trails, Inc. Offi cial Publication of Equestrian Trails, Inc. Serving equestrians since 1944 Volume 14, Issue 12 December 2014 Inside this issue: Where’s the Party? Beach Fun with 8 Pg 10 Corral 357 Annual 9 Presidents Luncheon 2015 Convention 12 Dates Special Olympics 13 World Equestrian Competition Corral 14 - Fall 14 Drive ~ Trail of History Kids’ Corner 20 Corral News 22 Upcoming Events High Point Shows Gymkhanas Trail Trials & Rides See pages 5-7 To Blanket or Not to Blanket? Rosie Kraut, daughter of ETI staff, Michelle Kraut, ready for the holidays! ready for Michelle Kraut, daughter of ETI staff, Kraut, Rosie Pg 17 Dedicated to Equine Legislation, Good Horsemanship, and the Acquisition and Preservation of Trails, Open Space and Public Lands ETI Contact Info Equestrian Trails, Inc. www.etinational.com PRESIDENT: Bob Foster [email protected] (661) 309-7371 P.O. Box 1138 Acton, CA 93510 1st VICE PRESIDENT: Keelie Buck Phone: (818) 698-6200 [email protected] (805) 207-0218 Fax: (661) 269-2507 Offi ce Hours: 9:00 am—4:00 pm 2nd VICE PRESIDENT: Sarah Williams [email protected] (213) 400-2168 Monday—Thursday (closed Fri) IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT: Linda Fullerton Debbie Foster — Offi ce Manager, Web Master, Insur- [email protected] (818) 401-9089 ance, Jr. Ambassador Chair & Queen of All Things [email protected] NATIONAL TRAIL COORDINATOR: TBD Michelle Kraut — Membership/Offi ce Manager DEPUTY TRAIL COORDINATOR: Terry Kaiser [email protected] [email protected] (818) 262-0315 Sarah Williams - Magazine [email protected] AREA TRAIL COORDINATOR: Elaine Macdonald [email protected] (661) 946-1976 Contents BOARD OF DIRECTORS 3 MAU Update Area 3 (Corrals: 2, 3, 15, 35) Dottie Hilliard [email protected] (626) 335-7112 5 Coming Events Calendar 8 Beach Fun with Corral 357 and Area 4 (Corrals: 66, 70, 88, 103) VACANT A Friendly Reminder Area 5 (Corrals: 14, 65, 83, 99) Patty Hug pat- 10 National Holiday Party [email protected] (818) 367-2056 11 Heritage Junction at William S.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Valley National Monument
    DEATH VALLEY NATIONAL MONUMENT CALIFORNIA NEVADA UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DEATH VALLEY NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL MONUMENT Contents DEATH VALLEY FROM BREAKFAST CANYON Cover Open all year • Regular season, October 15 to May 15 BEFORE WHITE MEN CAME 3 THE HISTORICAL DRAMA 4 cipitation at headquarters during the past TALES WRITTEN IN ROCK AND LANDSCAPE 5 DEATH VALLEY National Monument is distinguished by its desert scenery— 15 years has been 2.03 inches. DESERT WILDLIFE 10 a combination of unusual geology, flora, Summer daytime temperatures in the DESERT PLANTLIFE 11 fauna, and climate. Famed as a scene of valley itself are quite high. The maxi­ suffering in the gold-rush drama of mum air temperature of 134° F. in the INTERPRETIVE SERVICES 12 1849, Death Valley has long been shade recorded in Death Valley was a WHAT TO SEE AND DO WHILE IN THE MONUMENT 12 known to scientist and layman alike as world record until 1922 when 136.4° F. HOW TO REACH DEATH VALLEY 13 a region rich in scientific and human was reported from El Azizia, Libya. interest. The monument was established Higher locations on the mountains in the MONUMENT SEASON 14 in 1933 and covers almost 3,000 square monument have comfortable daytime WHAT TO WEAR 14 miles. temperatures and cool nights. ACCOMMODATIONS 14 The monument is in the rugged desert From late October until May, the val­ ADMINISTRATION 15 region east of the Sierra Nevada in east­ ley climate is usually very pleasant. ern California and southwestern Nevada. Days are often warm and sunny, nights PLEASE HELP PROTECT THIS MONUMENT 15 The valley itself is about 140 miles long, cool and invigorating, with the temper­ with the forbidding Panamint Range ature seldom below freezing.
    [Show full text]
  • While Traveling Over the Little-Used Road Between Rhyolite, Nevada
    VOL. 21, 1935 GEOLOGY: STOCK AND BODE 571 OCCURRENCE OF LOWER OLIGOCENE MAMMAL-BEARING BEDS NEAR DEATH VALLEY, CALIFORNIA By CHESTER STOCK AND FRANCIS D. BODE BALCH GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES, CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Communicated September 19, 1935 Introduction.-It is a curious fact that while the White River deposits with their wealth of vertebrate fossils are widely distributed in the western Great Plains and occur also in certain of the intermontane basins of the Cordilleran province, no horizon, recognized on the basis of land mammals as equivalent in time to the lower Oligocene or Titanotherium Zone, has been found beyond these areas on the North American continent.' All the more unusual does this fact seem when it is realized that since the definition of the White River Group by Hayden in 1862 and the early researches on the White River fossil vertebrates by Leidy, Cope and Marsh, field investigations in the Tertiary have progressed broadly and intensively over the Far West. Discovery of a significant record of this stage of the Oligocene in the Amargosa range, adjacent to Death Valley, not only brings a welcome addition to our knowledge of the distribution and relationships of lower Oligocene faunas, but also possesses important implications with regard to the early Tertiary history of this portion of the western Great Basin. The region, due in large measure perhaps to its inaccessibility and desolateness, has received in the main only reconnaissance study. How- ever, the early investigations of the geology of the Grapevine and Funeral Mountains by Gilbert,2 Spurr and by Ball elucidated much important information as part of the noteworthy contributions made by these surveys to an understanding of the stratigraphy and structure of southem Nevada and eastern California.
    [Show full text]
  • 1995/08/25-Part 6-Corrected Attachment 14, Residence Without
    The water flowing from Texas Springs and Furnace Creek was used, among other purposes, to help cool the families' shelters: ... and they were living in the shelters made out of--bush shelters. They used the arrowweed a lot for their shelters ... and in order to keep cool, what my mother told me--they'd get water from the creek because they're very close to the creek. And they would wet down the shelters ...and then they would throw, also, water onto their gravel floors, and they would put canvas over it and that way they'd stay cool. She said it was really nice. Those were her words anyway--that it wa: good (PE, Tape 2:9). In addition to using arrowweed which grew along the streambeds, people gathered sunflowers and grapes which were plentiful. Some families planted gardens near the flowing water from Texas Springs: ... Bob Thompson had a little gardening site: .. that's the one that they always taiked about--Bob Thompson's gardening place ... they tell me that he grew a lot of squash and a lot of melons. They say this is good country for melon and squash (PE, tape 2: 13). The Visitor's Center Area. In the 1930s the Pacific Coast Borax Company requested that the Timbisha people move from the Sunset Campground location to a place where there was no water, the present location of the Park Service Visitor's Center. They were told they would have water piped in for their use. The people were also told they would not be.asked to move again, so they moved their families into the area, constructing permanent living quarters, and planting fruit and other kinds of trees.
    [Show full text]
  • AMARGOSA RIVER BASIN Inyo and San Bernardino Counties, California & Nye County, Nevada
    2012 STATE OF THE BASIN REPORT; AMARGOSA RIVER BASIN Inyo and San Bernardino Counties, California & Nye County, Nevada 01-AC-002 Prepared For: Amargosa Conservancy P.O. Box 63 Shoshone, California 92384 Prepared By: 3478 Buskirk Avenue, Suite 100 Pleasant Hill, California 94523 March 12, 2012 Prepared By: Reviewed By: Jon R. Philipp, P.G., C.HG. Paul Horton, P.G., C.HG. Senior Hydrogeologist Principal Hydrogeologist 2012 State of the Basin Report, Amargosa River Basin Inyo and San Bernardino Counties, California & Nye County, Nevada March 12, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................ iii LIST OF APPENDICES ....................................................................................................................... iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... v 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Scope of Work ........................................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.1 Water Chemistry Data Collection ................................................................. 1-2 1.1.2 Discharge, Water Level and
    [Show full text]