DOCSLIB.ORG

The Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area As Park Prototype

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area As Park Prototype SUPPLEMENTARY BOOKLET FOR: Re(create) Flux: The Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area as Park Prototype CORNELL UNIVERSITY’S ENTRY IN THE PARKS FOR THE PEOPLE COMPETITION FOR THE CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER NATIONAL RECREATION AREA SITE i TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface The National Park Service Analyzed via Six Topics Matrix for Site Selection Round-One Proposal: Disruptive Technologies Five Initial Strategies History and Context of the Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area Examples of Process Mid-Term Review Site Visit Proposal Summaries Conclusions Preface The Parks for the People competition, announced in the Summer of 2011 by the Van Alen Institute in collaboration with the National Park Service, aims to “reimagine America’s most spectacular public places — its national parks — by using design as a catalyst to creatively rethink their connections to people and their role as revered natural, social, and cultural destinations” (Van Alen Website). The Van Alen Institute, an independent nonprofit architectural organization, promotes innovative thinking about the role of architecture and design in civic life through activities such as design competitions, lectures and symposia, exhibitions, publications, research and advocacy (Van Alen Website). Five students from Cornell University’s Landscape Architecture Department, under the supervision of Marc Miller, decided to enter Van Alen’s competition in September of 2011, with the dual aim of completing the masters thesis and exploring the themes suggested by the competition, which were of great interest to each student. Before the first group meeting, each student considered the stated design principles on the competition website, which read: “reverence for place, engagement of all people, expansion beyond traditional boundaries, advancement of sustainability, informed decision-making, and an integrated research, planning, design, and review process” (Van Alen Website). These design principles guided the group throughout the following months of group and individual work. The five students, Bryan Harrison, Erik Jones, Chelsea Miller, Rebecca Montross and Christina Twomey, along with advisor Marc Miller, began the process in the Fall semester by reading and discussing texts related to the history of the National Park Service, the historic and contemporary role of “large parks” in the United States, and the role of landscape architects in shaping and imagining open space in the United States. The discussion of these more general themes, outlined in the following section, were fundamental to the conception of the first-round competition entry, entitled “Disruptive Technologies,” also included in this booklet. The Van Alen Institute and the National Park Service had identified seven sites nationwide which would be the focus of semester-long work by the chosen schools. Instead of selecting one of the seven sites based solely on geographic convenience, the Cornell students considered each site’s relevance to the themes they had identified as most significant, i.e. the thesis topics. The site which proved most robust in terms of applicability to the project themes was the Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area in Atlanta, Georgia. After being selected as one of the nine studios nationwide to continue on in the Van Alen’s “Parks for the People” competition, each student read and analyzed studies related to his or her chosen thesis topic. A group trip to the Chattahoochee River in March 2012 deepened the group’s understanding of conditions on the ground, and led each student to the selection of part of the park to be recommended for programming and design. Each student’s contribution to the design proposal seeks to address issues facing current or future users of the National Parks, and suggests that the National Park Service will benefit by privileging topics such as the role of technology in the park, the site’s cultural history, and the health and well-being of park users. The projects attempt to address the concerns of multiple organizations, including the National Park Service, the Van Alen Institute, and the Department of Landscape Architecture at Cornell University. Included in this supplementary booklet are summaries of the themes explored, discussed and debated throughout the year (and written by individual members), experiences of the team at Cornell and on the road, and several conclusions drawn. Each student’s individual thesis project is here presented in a protracted form for the purposes of this competition entry. The team is extremely grateful for the support and time of the Cornell Landscape Architecture Department, the Van Alen Institute and the National Park Service. 1 Fall Semester 2011 - The National Park System via Six Topics -Park as Curation: What is the role of the park and what determines its legibility? -Park as Lab: Can the park be seen as an experimental space, a field in flux and/or painterly space? -The Emergent Park: How are uncertainty and adaptive management incorporated into park planning? -Park as Economic Incubator: Can the park be a revenue generating entity and/or self-sustaining? -Park as Network: How does the park incorporate technology and create social, infrastructural, and natural networks? -Parkitecture: How does architecture influence park experience, legibility, and identity? Is it the sole means to designate place? -Park as Curation: What is the role of the park and what determines its legibility? Topic Summaries: Park as Curation One of the goals of the National Parks Service is to provide visitors with a memorable experience though image. The aesthetic inspiration provided by natural systems is extremely important for a park’s success and popularity and, like the technical workings of a park, is a primarily anthropocentric system. Within the context of the Chattahoochee National Recreation Area, what imaged experience should the Parks Service seek to provide? How should the vernacular qualities of the Chattahoochee National Recreation Area be expressed and exposed through design, in terms of landscape architecture and architecture? Can virtual interfaces create effective methods of experiencing the site? The concept of the Park as a work of “curation” evokes certain qualities that parks share with places more traditionally associated with “curation”: museums. Both parks and museums are inventions of a romantic age, places which display the mark of the human hand upon a variety of materials, from canvas to clay to soil to concrete. Both parks and museums have significant societal implications, both positive (as democratic, accessible sites of recreation and education) and negative (as exclusive, classist, elite institutions, at times stifling or stifled by rules). While some parks and museums face crowd-control problems (ie Yellowstone National Park or the Museum of Modern Art in New York City), others are essentially unknown and almost irrelevant. As a result of their association with relatively antiquated ways of living (read: pre-internet) both parks and museums today find themselves in something of an identity crisis. Though loved by many, the challenge before parks and museums is to reach out to and connect with a generation of potential visitors who understand “artifice” and “virtual realities” in a way that past generations never have. The challenge is therefore to integrate the active, participatory aspects of “virtual reality” with the park experience. Park “curation” must be “adaptive,” and responsive to the needs and desires of a growing generation of urban visitors. Landscape architects are now charged with the task of curating potential uses, or flexible park “programming.” Open space must be more open than ever, while maintaining qualities traditionally associated with parks: safety, tranquility, and ecology. One advantage of designers and planners is the prevalence of ideas of “sustainability” and “green-ness” in popular culture and educational curricula. This means that even if the romantic ideal of sublimity or inspiration via contemplation of the wilderness is less popular, young people are still interested in visiting parks for contact with vibrant ecologies, as well as for exercise and recreation. Curation now deals with the selection and juxtaposition not only of materials, but with the organization of experiences and programs, as well as the “curation” of ecological systems and cultural references. Of course, these various systems have always been considered, or at least documented, in park design. But the opportunity before landscape architects is to reveal and share the “curation” of these systems, thus making park design more coherent and engaging. Park as Lab To discuss the Park as a Laboratory the fall class looked at two landscapes that exemplify the park as a place of research. Parks, as manipulated and changed environments, allow humans to exert a level of control which allows for experimental methodology to be expressed. There is a need for data collection in order for the work of remediation in the future, and to understand natural/man-made ecological systems. Also critical is the understanding that large parks do not behave in the same manner even within cities. “Experimental landscapes” or experimental landscape interventions go beyond the idea of designer ecology, which has its place as an educational component and which can result in a paradigm shift in society. However, in thinking 2 of a park as a “lab,” large-scale parks have the potential for great effect (both positive and negative). The amount of space in a large park allows for variation and experimentation on a grand scale. Large parks can be utilized to contribute to the body of scientific knowledge in ecology, restoration, and human impacts on the environment, while serving the needs of the public in the land’s capacity as park. There is a need for analysis of the interventions that designers make upon the land. This knowledge will add to our ability to create adaptive ecological designs, which can be resilient to the changes that are both natural and human-induced. Two of the projects reviewed in the Fall semester were the ART@AMD park and the Pontine Marshes project. ART@ AMD refers to Acid Mine Drainage.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area Geologic
    GeologicGeologic Resource Resourcess Inventory Inventory Scoping Scoping Summary Summary Chattahoochee Glacier Bay National River NationalPark, Alaska Recreation Area Georgia Geologic Resources Division PreparedNational Park by Katie Service KellerLynn Geologic Resources Division October US Department 31, 2012 of the Interior National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior The Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) Program, administered by the Geologic Resources Division (GRD), provides each of 270 identified natural area National Park System units with a geologic scoping meeting, a scoping summary (this document), a digital geologic map, and a geologic resources inventory report. Geologic scoping meetings generate an evaluation of the adequacy of existing geologic maps for resource management. Scoping meetings also provide an opportunity to discuss park-specific geologic management issues, distinctive geologic features and processes, and potential monitoring and research needs. If possible, scoping meetings include a site visit with local experts. The Geologic Resources Division held a GRI scoping meeting for Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area on March 19, 2012, at the headquarters building in Sandy Springs, Georgia. Participants at the meeting included NPS staff from the national recreation area, Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park, and the Geologic Resources Division; and cooperators from the University of West Georgia, Georgia Environmental Protection Division, and Colorado State University (see table 2, p. 21). During the scoping meeting, Georgia Hybels (NPS Geologic Resources Division, GIS specialist) facilitated the group’s assessment of map coverage and needs, and Bruce Heise (NPS Geologic Resources Division, GRI program coordinator) led the discussion of geologic features, processes, and issues. Jim Kennedy (Georgia Environmental Protection Division, state geologist) provided a geologic overview of Georgia, with specific information about the Chattahoochee River area.
    [Show full text]
  • THE POWER's HOUSE (Site 9FU561) an Archaeological
    An Archaeological Assessment of THE POWER’S HOUSE (Site 9FU561) Morgan Falls Park, Sandy Springs, Fulton County, Georgia An Archaeological Assessment of the Power's House Site (9FU561), Morgan Falls Park, Sandy Springs Fulton County, Georgia Report submitted to: Sandy Springs Conservancy • 383 Morgan Falls Road • Atlanta, Georgia 30350 Report prepared by: New South Associates • 6150 East Ponce de Leon Avenue • Stone Mountain, Georgia 30083 J.W. Joseph PhD, RPA – Principal Investigator Wm. Matthew Tankersley – Archaeologist and Co-Author J.W. Joseph PhD, RPA – Archaeologist and Co-Author August 18, 2009 • Redacted Report New South Associates Technical Report 1775 I. INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of an archaeological assessment of the Power’s House Site, also known as the Adair Cottage, an archaeological ruin (9FU561) located within the boundaries of the City of Sandy Spring's Morgan Falls Overlook Park. The site was outside the study area of both a 2005 environmental assessment (EA) and the Georgia Power Relicensing Project, thus was not included in the findings of these reports. The home site was exposed when the City of Sandy Springs did preparatory clearing for the Morgan Falls Overlook Park. Its presence has sparked interest in the Sandy Springs community regarding the age and association of this site, as well as potential values that the chimney and house site, if preserved, could bring to the park. The Sandy Springs Conservancy (SSC) has a long- standing interest in the Morgan Falls area. As early as 1999, many saw the potential for a riverside park on what was an overgrown and abandoned county parcel.
    [Show full text]
  • 137 CHAPTER 5 NATURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT What Are
    Chapter 5 Natural Resources Element (June 20, 2005 Draft) 137 Roswell, Georgia, Comprehensive Plan 2025 CHAPTER 5 NATURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT What are the natural features which make a township handsome? A river, with its waterfalls and meadows, a lake, a hill, a cliff or individual rocks, a forest, and ancient trees standing singly. Such things are beautiful; they have a high use which dollars and cents never represent. If the inhabitants of a town were wise, they would seek to preserve these things, though at a considerable expense… Henry David Thoreau, Journal, 1861 (Quoted in Dramstad, Olson, and Forman 1996) The Natural Resources Element provides the City with the opportunity to inventory natural and environmentally sensitive resources; to consider the issues, problems and opportunities associated with those resources; and to develop goals, policies and strategies for their appropriate use, conservation and protection that are consistent with those established for other Plan elements. An assessment of natural resources must be conducted to consider how they can most wisely and responsibly be utilized, developed, managed or preserved in order to yield maximum long- range benefits to the community. The assessment should also consider the potential vulnerability of the community's natural resources to land development and other human activities and evaluate whether protecting them is important to the future health and economic well being of the community. Levels of community support for conservation of various natural resources should also be considered. The results of this assessment should be considered in the development of needs and goals and an associated implementation strategy that sets forth any special treatment or protection to be provided these resources over the planning period.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Upper Chattahoochee River Basin
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Water Resources Division Ft. Collins, CO Genetic integrity of an isolated population of shoal bass (Micropterus cataractae) in the upper Chattahoochee River basin Natural Resource Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR—2007/366 ON THE COVER A shoal bass (Micropterus cataractae) captured from Big Creek, Chattahoochee River National Recreation. Photograph by: James M. Long Genetic integrity of an isolated population of shoal bass (Micropterus cataractae) in the upper Chattahoochee River basin Natural Resource Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR—2007/366 Elizabeth E. Dakin Department of Biological Sciences Duquesne University 600 Forbes Avenue Pittsburg, PA 15282 Brady A. Porter Department of Biological Sciences Duquesne University 600 Forbes Avenue Pittsburg, PA 15282 Byron J. Freeman Institute of Ecology University of Georgia Athens, GA 30602 James M. Long National Park Service 1978 Island Ford Parkway Atlanta, GA 30350 April 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Water Resources Division Ft. Collins, CO i The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resources Technical Reports series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2012 2012’S Worst Offenses Against GEORGIA’S WATER
    Flat Creek Richland Creek Allen Creek Savannah River South River Ogeechee River Altamaha River Patchitla Creek Flint River Tired Creek November 2012 2012’s Worst Offenses Against GEORGIA’S WATER GEORGIA WATER COALITION’S DIRTY DOZEN 2012: A CALL TO ACTION Georgia Water Coalition’s “Dirty Dozen” list highlights the worst offenses to Georgia’s waters. What unites each of the “Dirty Dozen” is that public waters are being abused in ways that benefit a few, but harm many including property owners, downstream communities, fish and wildlife, hunters and anglers, and boaters and swimmers. Over the past decade, the health of Georgia’s waterways has been compromised by a lack of funding for environmental protection programs and political cronyism. Georgia’s Environmental Protection Division (EPD) has seen its funding cut by 44 percent and staff cut by 23 percent (250 positions) since 2008, seriously jeopardizing its ability to enforce the state’s environmental laws. More problematic is the political cronyism that puts campaign contributors and their business interests on the Department of Natural Resources Board, which oversees EPD—the agency that regulates those same businesses. Board members who have spoken up for the protection of waterways have been systematically removed from the board and replaced with political cronies. Of the 16 governor-appointed board members currently serving, 11 have ties to entities that EPD regulates. Even the current Director of EPD, a political-appointee of Gov. Nathan Deal, previously served as a lobbyist for a firm that represents industry and business groups. Too often in Georgia, the “fox is watching the hen house,” and the system gives polluters free passes while the rest of us get dirty water.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Nutrient Reduction Benefits for Policy Analysis Using Linked Non-Market Valuation and Environmental Assessment Models
    Measuring Nutrient Reduction Benefits for Policy Analysis Using Linked Non-Market Valuation and Environmental Assessment Models Final Report on Stated Preference Surveys Authors Daniel J. Phaneuf University of Wisconsin Roger H. von Haefen North Carolina State University Carol Mansfield and George Van Houtven RTI International Version Date: February 2013 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was funded by Grant #X7-83381001-0 from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water. Information contained in this report represents the opinion of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views and policies of the Agency. The authors of this report would like to thank a number of people for their contributions to the work presented in this report. First, we acknowledge research team members Dr. Ken Reckhow and Dr. Melissa Kenney for their contributions to the survey design and analysis that we discuss here. Dr. Kevin Boyle and Dr. John Whitehead served as peer reviewers for the survey instrument and provided valuable advice on the design. Ross Loomis, from RTI International, helped with the analysis and development of the spreadsheet tool discussed in the report. We also thank Dr. F. Reed Johnson, also from RTI International, for assistance in the experimental design aspect of the survey. Finally, we would like to thank James Glover and Emily Hollingsworth, from the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, for their help in developing the survey instrument. ii ABSTRACT This document summarizes the economic modeling component of the project Measuring Nutrient Reduction Benefits for Policy Analysis Using Linked Non-Market Valuation and Environmental Assessment Models.
    [Show full text]
  • April 4, 2020 - 10Th Annual SWEEP the HOOCH Site List
    April 4, 2020 - 10th Annual SWEEP THE HOOCH Site List Sponsor Sites Host Site Name CAP walker Paddler Wader Description county CRNRA Allenbrook 10 Walker Moderate to strenous hiking along Atlanta St and associated trails Fulton CRK Azalea Boat Ramp 25 Paddler Paddle Bull Sluice Lake (above the dam) from Azalea Park. Fulton YES CRNRA Bowman's Island South 30 Walker Moderate hiking for trash pickup Forsyth Tailwater TU Buford Dam West/Bowman Island 10 Walker Wader Wade the area of the dam down to Bowman Island and walk the west Forsyth side picking up trash from the water and bluffs. Newnan Paddlers Meetup & Friends Bush Head Shoals Park 30 Walker Paddler Part of CBSP but operated by Heard County. We have opportunities for Heard of Chattahoochee Bend State Park both paddlers and walkers, paddling to and from the islands, walking river banks (wooded), or through shoals to Franklin (5 mile). Chattahoochee Hills Parks Campbellton Park 20 Walker Clear trash and debris along river. Fulton YES CRNRA Cochran Shoals/Columns Drive 40 Walker Moderate hiking for trail maintenance Cobb Oconee River Chapter TU Crayfish Creek 25 Walker Wader Picking up trash along Crayfish Creek, the trail that leads to the stream, Gwinnett and near the parking area. Don Carter State Park Don Carter State Park 50 Walker Paddler Wader We will be cleaning up the shoreline of Lake Lanier on foot, via Hall canoes/kayaks and using our pontoon boat. CRK Garrard Landing to Island Ford 25 Paddler Easy paddle from Garrard Landing to Island Ford - 5 mile section. Fulton YES City of Sugar Hill and Gwinnett DWR Gary Pirkle Park 40 Walker This site covers a large area along Richland Creek, a tributary of the Gwinnett Chattahoochee River.
    [Show full text]
  • December 18, 2018 Langdale Project (FERC No. 2341)
    Southern Company Generation. 241 Ralph McGill Boulevard, NE Bin 10193 Atlanta, GA 30308-3374 404 506 7219 tel December 18, 2018 Langdale Project (FERC No. 2341) Application for Surrender of Minor Project License Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Room 1-A – Dockets Room Washington, DC 20427 Dear Secretary Bose: On behalf of Georgia Power Company, Southern Company is filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) an application to surrender the minor project license for the Langdale Project in compliance with the Commission’s regulations at 18 C.F.R. §§ 6.1 and 6.2. The current Langdale Project license expires December 31, 2023. This surrender application consists of this cover letter, the Notice to Intent to Surrender, Exhibit A, and Exhibit E (which contains the Draft Decommissioning Plan as an appendix). The surrender application will be available through the FERC’s e-library website, and, as requested, via email or U.S. mail. A complete hard copy of the surrender application will be available at the Southern Company street address provided in the letterhead. After January 7, 2019, copies of the surrender applications will be available at the H. Grady Bradshaw Library, located at 3419 20th Avenue, Valley, Alabama, 36854, in Chambers County, Alabama, and at the Troup-Harris Regional Library, located at 7511 Georgia Highway 116, Hamilton, Georgia, 31811 in Harris County, Georgia. If you have questions or comments, please feel free to contact me at 404.506.7219 or at [email protected] Sincerely, Courtenay R. O’Mara, P.E.
    [Show full text]
  • April 4, 2020 - 10Th Annual SWEEP the HOOCH Site List
    April 4, 2020 - 10th Annual SWEEP THE HOOCH Site List Sponsor Sites Host Site Name CAP walker Paddler Wader Description county CRNRA Allenbrook 10 Walker Moderate to strenous hiking along Atlanta St and associated trails Fulton CRK Azalea Boat Ramp 25 Paddler Paddle Bull Sluice Lake (above the dam) from Azalea Park. Fulton YES CRNRA Bowman's Island South 30 Walker Moderate hiking for trash pickup Forsyth Tailwater TU Buford Dam West/Bowman Island 10 Walker Wader Wade the area of the dam down to Bowman Island and walk the west Forsyth side picking up trash from the water and bluffs. Newnan Paddlers Meetup & Friends Bush Head Shoals Park 30 Walker Paddler Part of CBSP but operated by Heard County. We have opportunities for Heard of Chattahoochee Bend State Park both paddlers and walkers, paddling to and from the islands, walking river banks (wooded), or through shoals to Franklin (5 mile). Chattahoochee Hills Parks Campbellton Park 20 Walker Clear trash and debris along river. Fulton YES CRNRA Cochran Shoals/Columns Drive 40 Walker Moderate hiking for trail maintenance Cobb Oconee River Chapter TU Crayfish Creek 25 Walker Wader Picking up trash along Crayfish Creek, the trail that leads to the stream, Gwinnett and near the parking area. Don Carter State Park Don Carter State Park 50 Walker Paddler Wader We will be cleaning up the shoreline of Lake Lanier on foot, via Hall canoes/kayaks and using our pontoon boat. CRK Garrard Landing to Island Ford 25 Paddler Easy paddle from Garrard Landing to Island Ford - 5 mile section. Fulton YES City of Sugar Hill and Gwinnett DWR Gary Pirkle Park 40 Walker This site covers a large area along Richland Creek, a tributary of the Gwinnett Chattahoochee River.
    [Show full text]
  • Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area Historic Resource Study
    Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area Historic Resource Study February 2007 written by Marti Gerdes and Scott Messer additional material by Tommy Jones edited by Jody Cook and Tommy Jones The historic resource study presented here exists in two formats. A traditional, printed version is available for study at the park, the Southeast Regional Office of the NPS (SERO), and at a variety of other repositories. For more widespread access, this historic resource study also exists in a web- based format through the web site of the National Park Service. Please visit www.nps.gov for more information. Cultural Resources Division Southeast Regional Office National Park Service 100 Alabama Street, SW Atlanta, GA 30303 404.562.3117 Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area 1978 Island Ford Parkway Atlanta, GA 30350-3400 http://www.nps.gov/chat About the cover: The front cover shows a photograph of Jones Bridge taken in 2006 by Tommy H. Jones. The rear cover shows a collection of images including, top left, a view of Roswell Mill, courtesy of Roswell Historical Society; center right and left, three historic postcard views of the river from the collection of Jody Cook; and, bottom, a view of the James Power House, from the Vanishing Georgia Collection, Georgia Department of Archives and History. Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area Historic Resource Study Table of Contents Foreword - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ix Introduction Study Purpose and Scope - - - - - - - - - -
    [Show full text]
  • Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area Georgia
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area Georgia Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area Draft General Management Plan/ Environmental Impact Statement Draft General Management Plan/ Environmental Impact Statement Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area Atlanta, Georgia United States Department of the Interior National Park Service May, 2004 Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area Draft General Management Plan/EIS (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area Draft General Management Plan/EIS Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area Draft General Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER NATIONAL RECREATION AREA Atlanta, Georgia This Draft General Management Plan Amendment/Environmental Impact Statement evaluates four al- ternatives for the future management of the Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area. It de- fines the strategies that will allow for diverse visitor use of the Chattahoochee River National Rec- reation Area, protect park resources, and provide for the enjoyment of the people. The National Park Service is the lead agency for this project. The Centralized Access Alternative, the preferred alternative, would draw visitors toward a system of three hubs in which administrative and interpretive facilities would provide visitor information, rest rooms, parking lot and roads, trail heads, and access to the Chattahoochee River. The hubs would provide an opportunity to optimize the visitors’ experience and understanding of the park. The visi- tors’ experience would be focused on the interpretive activities and other facilities available while in the hubs, and provide for solitude and natural settings outside the hubs. This alternative would allow the National Park Service to concentrate limited resources in hubs, while maintaining a wide variety of visitor use.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Dirty Dozen Press Release
    Georgia Water Coalition names “Dirty Dozen” exposing the 12 worst offenses to Georgia’s water For more information contact: Joe Cook, 706‐409‐0128, [email protected]; or April Ingle, 706‐549‐4508, [email protected] Individual contacts for each site on the dirty dozen list are available at: www.garivers.org/gawater/dirtydozen.htm FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 11‐14‐12 – Today, Georgia’s leading water protection group named its “Dirty Dozen” for 2012, exposing the worst offenses to Georgia’s water. The sites range from an unnecessary reservoir in northeast Georgia to a tire dump in southwest Georgia. The Georgia Water Coalition is a consortium of 175 conservation and environmental organizations, hunting and fishing groups, businesses, and faith‐based organizations that have been working to protect Georgia’s water since 2002. Collectively, these organizations represent more than 300,000 Georgians. “This list not only highlights some of the most egregious water pollution problems in our state, but also calls attention to state policies that harm our rivers and waste our tax dollars,” said April Ingle, executive director at Georgia River Network. “The sites on this list are examples of Georgia’s failures to protect our water, our fish and wildlife and our communities.” Topping the list for the second year in a row is the Ogeechee River where a textile manufacturing plant’s toxic discharge led to the death of some 38,000 fish in May 2011. A hazardous waste site adjacent to Atlanta’s Hartsfield‐Jackson International Airport, Glades Reservoir proposed near Gainesville, a Flint River groundwater injection experiment near Albany, Richland Creek Reservoir proposed in Paulding County and Rayonier’s pulp mill in Jesup round out the top six.
    [Show full text]