Incidence of Soybean Dwarf Virus and Identification of Potential Vectors in Illinois

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Incidence of Soybean dwarf virus and Identification of Potential Vectors in Illinois Barbara Harrison and Todd A. Steinlage, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; Leslie L. Domier, USDA-ARS, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; and Cleora J. D’Arcy, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801 has been used to further subdivide the ABSTRACT dwarfing and yellowing strains (32). Harrison, B., Steinlage, T. A., Domier, L. L., and D’Arcy, C. J. 2005. Incidence of Soybean SbDV-DS strains are transmitted by A. dwarf virus and identification of potential vectors in Illinois. Plant Dis. 89:28-32. solani, and SbDV-DP strains are transmit- ted by Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) and Soybean dwarf virus (SbDV), which causes an important disease of soybeans in Japan, is persis- Nearctaphis bakeri (Cowen). Similarly, tently transmitted by aphids and is endemic in forage legumes in the United States. To determine SbDV-YS strains are transmitted by A. the incidence of SbDV in Illinois, we collected clovers and forage legumes in a total of 49 Illi- solani, and SbDV-YP strains are transmit- nois counties in 2001 and 2002 and tested them for the presence of SbDV by reverse- ted by Acyrthosiphon pisum, N. bakeri, transcription–polymerase chain reaction. SbDV was detected in 43% of red clover (Trifolium pratense), 10% of white clover (T. repens), and 3% of yellow sweet clover (Melilotus officinalis) and very rarely by Aphis glycines Matsu- plant samples. The dwarfing strain (SbDV-D) was the predominant strain detected in Illinois. In mura (16). SbDV isolates from different 2000, Aphis glycines, an aphid species that colonizes soybeans, was reported for the first time in geographic regions also can display differ- North America. To determine whether A. glycines or aphid species found colonizing clover were ent transmission specificities. Japanese vectors of SbDV, transmission studies were conducted. Aphids of the species Nearctaphis bakeri SbDV isolates were transmitted by A. so- reproducibly vectored SbDV among red clovers, and from red clover to soybean. A. glycines did lani, Acyrthosiphon pisum, and N. bakeri, not transmit SbDV; neither did two other clover-infesting aphid species, Acyrthosiphon pisum but not by Myzus persicae (Sulzer) or and Therioaphis trifolii. Aphis craccivora Koch (16,26). In New Zealand and Tasmania, Acyrthosiphon pisum, Aulacorthum solani, and Macrosi- phum euphorbiae (Thomas) vectored Soybean dwarf virus (SbDV), a member In Japan, the polyphagous Aulacorthum white-clover infecting isolates of SbDV, of the Luteoviridae, was first identified in solani (Kaltenbach) is the principal vector but as in Japan, M. persicae and Aphis association with outbreaks of dwarfed of SbDV (15). In northern Japan, A. solani craccivora did not transmit SbDV (19). In soybean (Glycine max L.) plants that had is holocyclic, and its eggs overwinter on the United States, SbDV isolates from severe yield losses in northern Japan in red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) and white clover were transmitted by both 1969 (29). Subsequently, similar viruses white clover (T. repens L.) plants, many of Acyrthosiphon pisum and M. persicae, but were identified in Australia, Ethiopia, Iran, which are infected with SbDV (2,15). In not by Aulacorthum solani (9,12,19). New Zealand, Syria, and the United States the spring, viruliferous winged aphids This specificity of transmission is en- (1,20,22–25,33). In northern regions of develop on these hosts and fly to soybean, gendered by interactions between aphid Japan, SbDV is one of the most important where feeding of viruliferous aphids leads membrane barriers and virus proteins. virus diseases of soybean (15). Yield losses to SbDV infections. The disease is spread Gildow et al. (12) examined the movement from SbDV have been shown to be linearly in the field by parthenogenic apterous of transmissible and nontransmissible correlated with percent SbDV infection in aphids throughout the summer, until sexual SbDV isolates through M. persicae and soybean fields, with a 50% infection caus- generations emerge again in autumn and observed that a nontransmissible SbDV ing a 40% yield loss that results from a migrate back to clover to lay eggs and isolate could not penetrate the salivary reduced number of pods set (2,28). Due to complete their life cycle (2,15). basal lamina of M. persicae. The salivary the persistent nature of its transmission, Many species from several plant fami- basal plasmalemma, the cell layer adjacent SbDV is transmitted efficiently only by lies are susceptible to SbDV, but the most to the basal lamina, served as the barrier colonizing aphids (26). In the United common hosts of SbDV are members of for transmission for an isolate that was not States, SbDV has been detected primarily the Fabaceae (4,8,30). Based on the symp- transmitted by A. solani. SbDV-D and in clover plants and rarely infects soybean, toms they produce in soybean, SbDV iso- SbDV-Y strains share 83% amino acid presumably because of the absence of lates have been divided into two strains: sequence identity (32). The greatest se- aphid vectors that colonize soybean (9,10). dwarfing (SbDV-D) and yellowing (SbDV- quence variability between the two strains Y) (27). SbDV-D symptoms in soybean of SbDV is found in the C-terminal half of plants include shortened internodes and the coat protein readthrough domain and Corresponding author: L. L. Domier petioles and dark colored, brittle leaves the 3′ noncoding region (32). Yet amino E-mail: [email protected] that curl downward. SbDV-Y causes less acid sequence variation in the N-terminal Mention of a trademark, proprietary product, or stunting, but the symptoms tend to be more region of the readthrough domain has been vendor does not constitute a guarantee or warranty severe and include interveinal chlorosis, reported to be related to specificity of of the product by the USDA or the University of thickened and brittle mature leaves, and aphid transmission of SbDV (31). Illinois and does not imply its approval to the leaflets that do not fully develop and be- Aphis glycines was identified in the exclusion of other products or vendors that may come rugose (30). Dwarfing and yellowing United States for the first time in 2000 (13) also be suitable. strains of SbDV show differences in host and subsequently has spread throughout Accepted for publication 26 July 2004. range. Dwarfing strains infect red clover much of the soybean growing region of but not white clover, while yellowing North America (17). The introduction of A. strains infect white clover but not red clo- glycines, an aphid species that colonizes DOI: 10.1094/PD-89-0028 ver (8,26). soybean plants, has the potential to in- This article is in the public domain and not copy- Like other members of the Luteoviridae, rightable. It may be freely reprinted with custom- crease the incidence in North America of ary crediting of the source. The American Phyto- SbDV isolates can show differential trans- persistently and nonpersistently transmit- pathological Society, 2005. mission by different aphid species, which ted viruses in soybean. A. glycines has 28 Plant Disease / Vol. 89 No. 1 been reported to transmit several viruses, Fig. 1) was synthesized that flanked a re- the Illinois Natural History Survey. To including Alfalfa mosaic virus, Bean com- gion in the 3′ NCR that was diagnostically clean the field-collected aphids of persis- mon mosaic virus, Bean yellow mosaic variable between dwarfing and yellowing tently transmitted viruses, they were virus, Cucumber mosaic virus, Indonesian strains. RT-PCR reactions were performed placed on greenhouse-grown healthy red soybean dwarf virus (ISDV), Peanut stripe as above with an annealing temperature of clover leaves and new-borne nymphs were virus, Peanut stunt virus, Soybean mosaic 55°C. immediately transferred to leaves of virus (SMV), and Tobacco ringspot virus Incidence of SbDV infection. Clover healthy plants. Aphis craccivora was (3,7,14,18). ISDV is another member of and other plants were collected from reared on healthy Vicia faba L. cv. Im- the Luteoviridae that causes symptoms ditches and field borders during the grow- proved Long Pod. Aphis glycines was similar to SbDV in soybean but is sero- ing seasons of 2001 and 2002 from an reared on healthy soybean cv. Williams 82. logically distinct from SbDV (18). While average of two locations per county. In Acyrthosiphon pisum, N. bakeri, and T. in one instance A. glycines was reported to 2001, entire plants were dug up from 35 trifolii were reared on healthy red clover. transmit SbDV rarely (15), other reports counties, brought back to the greenhouse, All colonies were maintained in cylindrical have found no transmission of Japanese and replanted in pots. Plants that tested acrylic cages in growth chambers main- isolates of SbDV by A. glycines (28,29). positive for SbDV by RT-PCR were used tained at 23°C and 17-h day length. This is the first study of SbDV in Illi- as sources of inoculum for transmission Transmission of SbDV by aphids. nois. Our objectives were to determine the studies described below. In 2002, leaf tis- SbDV-D isolates were used for transmis- distribution of SbDV in Illinois in forage sue from clover plants was collected from sion studies because they were the most legumes that border soybean fields, deter- an average of two locations in 36 Illinois prevalent in Illinois. Five SbDV-positive mine the prevalent strain(s) of the virus, counties. All plants were analyzed for clover samples, two from Champaign and identify potential vectors of the virus SbDV infection using RT-PCR. In 2001, a County and one each from Coles, Cumber- in Illinois. subset of plants negative for SbDV infec- land, and Douglas counties in Illinois, tion with primers SbDV-3248F and SbDV- were used as source tissue in initial aphid MATERIALS AND METHODS 3529R were retested by RT-PCR using transmission tests for SbDV-D.
Recommended publications
  • Soybean Mosaic Virus

    Soybean Mosaic Virus

    -- CALIFORNIA D EP AUM ENT OF cdfa FOOD & AGRICULTURE ~ California Pest Rating Proposal for Soybean mosaic virus Current Pest Rating: none Proposed Pest Rating: C Kingdom: Orthornavirae; Phylum: Pisuviricota Class: Stelpaviricetes; Order: Patatavirales Family: Potyviridae; Genus: Potyvirus Comment Period: 6/15/2020 through 7/30/2020 Initiating Event: On August 9, 2019, USDA-APHIS published a list of “Native and Naturalized Plant Pests Permitted by Regulation”. Interstate movement of these plant pests is no longer federally regulated within the 48 contiguous United States. There are 49 plant pathogens (bacteria, fungi, viruses, and nematodes) on this list. California may choose to continue to regulate movement of some or all these pathogens into and within the state. In order to assess the needs and potential requirements to issue a state permit, a formal risk analysis for Soybean mosaic virus is given herein and a permanent pest rating is proposed. History & Status: Background: The family Potyviridae contains six genera and members are notable for forming cylindrical inclusion bodies in infected cells that can be seen with light microscopy. Of the six genera, the genus Potyvirus contains by far the highest number of important plant pathogens Named after Potato virus Y, “pot-y-virus” particles are flexuous and filamentous and composed of ssRNA and a protein coat. Most diseases caused by potyviruses appear primarily as mosaics, mottling, chlorotic rings, or color break on foliage, flowers, fruits, and stems. Many cause severe stunting of young plants and drastically reduced yields with leaf, fruit, and stem malformations, fruit drop, and necrosis (Agrios, 2005). Soybean is one of the most important sources of edible oil and proteins for people and animals, and a source of biofuel.
  • Role of Soybean Mosaic Virus–Encoded Proteins in Seed and Aphid Transmission in Soybean

    Role of Soybean Mosaic Virus–Encoded Proteins in Seed and Aphid Transmission in Soybean

    Virology e-Xtra* Role of Soybean mosaic virus–Encoded Proteins in Seed and Aphid Transmission in Soybean Sushma Jossey, Houston A. Hobbs, and Leslie L. Domier First and second authors: Department of Crop Sciences, and third author: United States Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801. Accepted for publication 2 March 2013. ABSTRACT Jossey, S., Hobbs, H. A., and Domier, L. L. 2013. Role of Soybean transmissibility of the two SMV isolates, and helper component pro- mosaic virus–encoded proteins in seed and aphid transmission in teinase (HC-Pro) played a secondary role. Seed transmission of SMV was soybean. Phytopathology 103:941-948. influenced by P1, HC-Pro, and CP. Replacement of the P1 coding region of SMV 413 with that of SMV G2 significantly enhanced seed transmis- Soybean mosaic virus (SMV) is seed and aphid transmitted and can sibility of SMV 413. Substitution in SMV 413 of the two amino acids cause significant reductions in yield and seed quality in soybean (Glycine that varied in the CPs of the two isolates with those from SMV G2, G to max). The roles in seed and aphid transmission of selected SMV-encoded D in the DAG motif and Q to P near the carboxyl terminus, significantly proteins were investigated by constructing mutants in and chimeric reduced seed transmission. The Q-to-P substitution in SMV 413 also recombinants between SMV 413 (efficiently aphid and seed transmitted) abolished virus-induced seed-coat mottling in plant introduction 68671. and an isolate of SMV G2 (not aphid or seed transmitted).
  • Viral Diseases of Soybeans

    Viral Diseases of Soybeans

    SoybeaniGrow BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Chapter 60: Viral Diseases of Soybeans Marie A.C. Langham ([email protected]) Connie L. Strunk ([email protected]) Four soybean viruses infect South Dakota soybeans. Bean Pod Mottle Virus (BPMV) is the most prominent and causes significant yield losses. Soybean Mosaic Virus (SMV) is the second most commonly identified soybean virus in South Dakota. It causes significant losses either in single infection or in dual infection with BPMV. Tobacco Ringspot Virus (TRSV) and Alfalfa Mosaic Virus (AMV) are found less commonly than BPMV or SMV. Managing soybean viruses requires that the living bridge of hosts be broken. Key components for managing viral diseases are provided in Table 60.1. The purpose of this chapter is to discuss the symptoms, vectors, and management of BPMV, SMV, TRSV, and AMV. Table 60.1. Key components to consider in viral management. 1. Viruses are obligate pathogens that cannot be grown in artificial culture and must always pass from living host to living host in what is referred to as a “living or green” bridge. 2. Breaking this “living bridge” is key in soybean virus management. a. Use planting dates to avoid peak populations of insect vectors (bean leaf beetle for BPMV and aphids for SMV). b. Use appropriate rotations. 3. Use disease-free seed, and select tolerant varieties when available. 4. Accurate diagnosis is critical. Contact Connie L. Strunk for information. (605-782-3290 or [email protected]) 5. Fungicides and bactericides cannot be used to manage viral problems. 60-541 extension.sdstate.edu | © 2019, South Dakota Board of Regents What are viruses? Viruses that infect soybeans present unique challenges to soybean producers, crop consultants, breeders, and other professionals.
  • Iáe Comparative Host Plant Range Studies Ofthebluealfaifa

    Iáe Comparative Host Plant Range Studies Ofthebluealfaifa

    STMSÍ^- ^ iáe Comparative Host Science and Education Administration Plant Range Studies Technical Bulletin oftheBlueAlfaifa Number 1 639 Aphiid, Acyrthosiphon Kon do/Sh in ji, and the Pea Aphid, Acyrthosiphon Pisum (l-iarris) (IHomoptera: Aphid idae) O :"-.;::>-"' C'" p _ ' ./ -• - -. -.^^ ■ ■ ■ ■ 'Zl'-'- CO ^::!:' ^. ^:"^"^ >^. 1 - «# V1--; '"^I I-*"' Í""' C30 '-' C3 ci :x: :'— -xj- -- rr- ^ T> r-^- C".' 1- 03—' O '-■:: —<' C-_- ;z: ë^GO Acknowledgments Contents Page The authors wish to thank Robert O. Kuehl and the staff Introduction -| of the Center for Quantitative Studies, University of Materials and methods -| Arizona, for their assistance in statistical analysis of Greenhouse studies -| these data. We are also grateful to S. M. Dietz, G. L Jordan, A. M. Davis, and W. H. Skrdia for providing seed Field studies 2 used in these studies. Statistical analyses 3 Resultsanddiscussion 3 Abstract Greenhouse studies 3 Field studies 5 Ellsbury, Michael M., and Nielsen, Mervin W. 1981. Classification of hosts studied in field and Comparative Host Plant Range Studies of the Blue greenhouse experiments 5 Alfalfa Aphid, Acyrthosiphon kondoi Shinji, and the Pea Conclusions Q Aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) (Homoptera: Literature cited 5 Aphididae). U.S. Departnnent of Agriculture, Technical Appendix 7 Bulletin No. 1639, 14 p. Host plant ranges of the blue alfalfa aphid (BAA), Acyrthosiphon kondoi Shinji, and the pea aphid (PA), Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris), were investigated on leguminous plant species. Fecundities of BAA and PA were determined on 84 plant species from the genera Astragalus, Coronilla, Lathyrus, Lens, Lotus, Lupinus, Medicago, Melilotus, Ononis, Phaseolus, Pisum, Trifolium, Vicia, and Vigna in greenhouse studies. Both aphids displayed a broad reproductive host range extending to species in all genera tested except Phaseolus.
  • Characterization of Seed Transmission of Soybean Mosaic Virus in Soybean

    Characterization of Seed Transmission of Soybean Mosaic Virus in Soybean

    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 4-24-2015 12:00 AM Characterization of Seed Transmission of Soybean Mosaic Virus in Soybean Tanvir Bashar The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr. Aiming Wang The University of Western Ontario Joint Supervisor Dr. Mark Bernards The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Biology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Science © Tanvir Bashar 2015 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Virology Commons Recommended Citation Bashar, Tanvir, "Characterization of Seed Transmission of Soybean Mosaic Virus in Soybean" (2015). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 2791. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/2791 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHARACTERIZATION OF SEED TRANSMISSION OF SOYBEAN MOSAIC VIRUS IN SOYBEAN (Thesis format: Monograph) by TANVIR BASHAR Graduate Program in Biology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Tanvir Bashar 2015 ABSTRACT Infection by Soybean mosaic virus (SMV) is recognized as a serious, long-standing threat in most soybean (Glyince max (L.)Merr.) producing areas of the world. The aim of this work was to understand how SMV transmits from infected soybean maternal tissues to the next generation by investigating the possible routes and amounts of seed transmission of SMV.
  • Taxonomy Geographical Distribution

    Taxonomy Geographical Distribution

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Beiträge zur Entomologie = Contributions to Entomology... Beitr. Ent., Berlin 25 (1975) 2, S. 2 57 -2 6 0 W i l h e l m PiECK-Universität R ostock Sektion Biologie Eorschungsgruppe Phyto-Entomologie Rostock F r i t z P a u l M u l l e r Incidence of the aphid Acyrthosiphon gossypii M o r d v i l k o on legumes and on cotton (Homoptera: Aphididae) With 2 text figures Some recently published papers have shown the aphid Acyrthosiphon sesbaniae K a s a - k a r a j D a v i d to he an efficacious vector for viruses of cultivated Fabaceae. K a i s e r & S o h a l k (1973) carried out transmission experiments with the circulative pea leaf roll virus which can cause serious losses in food legume crops in Iran and obtained high trans­ mission rates with A. sesbaniae. In the Northern Province of the Sudan A b ij S a l i h et al. (1973) ascertained the efficient transmissibility of the Sudanese broad bean mosaic virus by A. sesbaniae on Vida faba. The book of S chmtjtterer (1963) relates A. sesbaniae as an effective vector of the pea mosaic virus in central Sudan. During a visit in the Hudeiha Research Station in the Northern Province of the Sudan the present author found Vicia faba crops heavily infested by A. sesbaniae. Despite of the considerable virus transmitting ability and the mass infestation of particularly suitable host plants there exists no survey on the biology, host range and geographical distribution of the aphid.
  • Genetic Analysis of Soybean Mosaic Virus (SMV) Resistance Genes in Soybean [Glycine Max (L.) Merr.] Mariola Klepadlo University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

    Genetic Analysis of Soybean Mosaic Virus (SMV) Resistance Genes in Soybean [Glycine Max (L.) Merr.] Mariola Klepadlo University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 5-2016 Genetic Analysis of Soybean Mosaic Virus (SMV) Resistance Genes in Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] Mariola Klepadlo University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Plant Breeding and Genetics Commons, and the Plant Pathology Commons Recommended Citation Klepadlo, Mariola, "Genetic Analysis of Soybean Mosaic Virus (SMV) Resistance Genes in Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]" (2016). Theses and Dissertations. 1451. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1451 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Genetic Analysis of Soybean Mosaic Virus (SMV) Resistance Genes in Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences by Mariola Klepadlo University of Szczecin, Poland Bachelor of Science in Biotechnology, 2007 University of Szczecin, Poland Master of Science in Biotechnology, 2009 The Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania, Greece Master of Science in Horticultural Genetics and Biotechnology, 2011 May 2016 University of Arkansas This dissertation is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. ___________________________________ Dr. Pengyin Chen Dissertation Director ____________________________________ ___________________________________ Dr. Kenneth L. Korth Dr. Richard E. Mason Committee Member Committee Member ____________________________________ ___________________________________ Dr. Vibha Srivastava Dr. Ioannis E. Tzanetakis Committee Member Committee Member ABSTRACT Soybean mosaic virus (SMV) causes the most serious viral disease in soybean worldwide.
  • Aphid Transmission of Potyvirus: the Largest Plant-Infecting RNA Virus Genus

    Aphid Transmission of Potyvirus: the Largest Plant-Infecting RNA Virus Genus

    Supplementary Aphid Transmission of Potyvirus: The Largest Plant-Infecting RNA Virus Genus Kiran R. Gadhave 1,2,*,†, Saurabh Gautam 3,†, David A. Rasmussen 2 and Rajagopalbabu Srinivasan 3 1 Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA 2 Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]. † Authors contributed equally. Received: 13 May 2020; Accepted: 15 July 2020; Published: date Abstract: Potyviruses are the largest group of plant infecting RNA viruses that cause significant losses in a wide range of crops across the globe. The majority of viruses in the genus Potyvirus are transmitted by aphids in a non-persistent, non-circulative manner and have been extensively studied vis-à-vis their structure, taxonomy, evolution, diagnosis, transmission and molecular interactions with hosts. This comprehensive review exclusively discusses potyviruses and their transmission by aphid vectors, specifically in the light of several virus, aphid and plant factors, and how their interplay influences potyviral binding in aphids, aphid behavior and fitness, host plant biochemistry, virus epidemics, and transmission bottlenecks. We present the heatmap of the global distribution of potyvirus species, variation in the potyviral coat protein gene, and top aphid vectors of potyviruses. Lastly, we examine how the fundamental understanding of these multi-partite interactions through multi-omics approaches is already contributing to, and can have future implications for, devising effective and sustainable management strategies against aphid- transmitted potyviruses to global agriculture.
  • Parasitoids Induce Production of the Dispersal Morph of the Pea Aphid, Acyrthosiphon Pisum

    Parasitoids Induce Production of the Dispersal Morph of the Pea Aphid, Acyrthosiphon Pisum

    OIKOS 98: 323–333, 2002 Parasitoids induce production of the dispersal morph of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum John J. Sloggett and Wolfgang W. Weisser Sloggett, J. J. and Weisser, W. W. 2002. Parasitoids induce production of the dispersal morph of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. – Oikos 98: 323–333. In animals, inducible morphological defences against natural enemies mostly involve structures that are protective or make the individual invulnerable to future attack. In the majority of such examples, predators are the selecting agent while examples involving parasites are much less common. Aphids produce a winged dispersal morph under adverse conditions, such as crowding or poor plant quality. It has recently been demonstrated that pea aphids, Acyrthosiphon pisum, also produce winged offspring when exposed to predatory ladybirds, the first example of an enemy-in- duced morphological change facilitating dispersal. We examined the response of A. pisum to another important natural enemy, the parasitoid Aphidius er6i, in two sets of experiments. In the first set of experiments, two aphid clones both produced the highest proportion of winged offspring when exposed as colonies on plants to parasitoid females. In all cases, aphids exposed to male parasitoids produced a higher mean proportion of winged offspring than controls, but not significantly so. Aphid disturbance by parasitoids was greatest in female treatments, much less in male treatments and least in controls, tending to match the pattern of winged offspring production. In a second set of experiments, directly parasitised aphids produced no greater proportion of winged offspring than unparasitised controls, thus being parasitised itself is not used by aphids for induction of the winged morph.
  • Seasonal Abundance of Acyrthosiphon Pisum (Harris) (Homoptera: Aphididae) and Therioaphis Trifola (Monell) (Homoptera: Callaphididae) on Lucerne in Central Greece1

    Seasonal Abundance of Acyrthosiphon Pisum (Harris) (Homoptera: Aphididae) and Therioaphis Trifola (Monell) (Homoptera: Callaphididae) on Lucerne in Central Greece1

    ENTOMOLOGIA ÌIELLENICA 8 ( 1990): 41-46 Seasonal Abundance of Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) (Homoptera: Aphididae) and Therioaphis trifola (Monell) (Homoptera: Callaphididae) on Lucerne in Central Greece1 D. P. LYKOURESSIS and CH. P. POLATSIDIS Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 lera Odos, GR 118 55 Athens, Greece ABSTRACT Acyrthosiphonpisum (Harris) and Therioaphis trifolii (Monell) were the most abun­ dant aphid species on lucerne at Kopais, Co. Boiotia in central Greece from April 1984 to November 1986. Population fluctuations for A. pisum showed two peaks, the first during April-May and the second in November. Low numbers or zero were found during summer and till mid October as well as during winter and March. The abundance of this species during the year agrees generally with the effects of pre­ vailing temperatures in the region on aphid development and reproduction. T. tri­ fola also showed two population peaks but at different periods. The first occurred in July and the second from mid September to mid October. The first peak was higher than the second. The sharp decline in population densities that occurred in early August and lasted till mid September is not accounted for by adverse climatic conditions, but natural enemies and/or other limiting factors are possibly respon­ sible for that population reduction. Numbers were zero from December till March. while they kept at low levels during the rest of spring and part of June as well as from mid October till the end of November. Introduction species occurring quite frequently on lucerne in Several aphid species are known to attack temperate regions.
  • Characterization and Epidemiology of Soybean Vein Necrosis Associated Virus Jing Zhou University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

    Characterization and Epidemiology of Soybean Vein Necrosis Associated Virus Jing Zhou University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 12-2012 Characterization and Epidemiology of Soybean Vein Necrosis Associated Virus Jing Zhou University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Botany Commons, Molecular Biology Commons, and the Plant Pathology Commons Recommended Citation Zhou, Jing, "Characterization and Epidemiology of Soybean Vein Necrosis Associated Virus" (2012). Theses and Dissertations. 643. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/643 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. CHARACTERIZATION AND EPIDEMIOLOGY OF SOYBEAN VEIN NECROSIS ASSOCIATED VIRUS CHARACTERIZATION AND EPIDEMIOLOGY OF SOYBEAN VEIN NECROSIS ASSOCIATED VIRUS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Cell and Molecular Biology By Jing Zhou Qingdao Agriculture University, College of Life Sciences Bachelor of Science in Biotechnology, 2008 December 2012 University of Arkansas ABSTRACT Soybean vein necrosis disease (SVND) is widespread in major soybean-producing areas in the U.S. The typical disease symptoms exhibit as vein clearing along the main vein, which turn into chlorosis or necrosis as season progresses. Double-stranded RNA isolation and shot gun cloning of symptomatic tissues revealed the presence of a new tospovirus, provisionally named as Soybean vein necrosis associated virus (SVNaV). The presence of the virus has been confirmed in 12 states: Arkansas, Illinois, Missouri, Kansas, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, Maryland, Delaware, Virginia and New York.
  • Proposal to Sequence the Genome of the Pea Aphid (Acyrthosiphon Pisum)

    Proposal to Sequence the Genome of the Pea Aphid (Acyrthosiphon Pisum)

    Proposal To Sequence the Genome of the Pea Aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) The International Aphid Genomics Consortium (IAGC) Steering Committee (in alphabetical order): Marina Caillauda, Owain Edwardsb, Linda Fieldc, Danièle Giblot- Ducrayd, Stewart Graye, David Hawthornef, Wayne Hunterg, Georg Janderh, Nancy Morani, Andres Moyaj, Atsushi Nakabachik, Hugh Robertsonl, Kevin Shufranm, Jean- Christophe Simond, David Sternn, Denis Tagud Contact: D. Stern; Ph. 609-258-0759; FAX 609-258-7892; [email protected] Abstract We propose sequencing of the 300Mb nuclear genome of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Aphids display a diversity of biological problems that are not easily studied in other genetic model systems. First, because they are the premier model for the study of bacterial endosymbiosis and because they vector many well-studied plant viruses, aphids are an excellent model for studying animal interactions with microbes. Second, because their normal life cycle displays extreme developmental plasticity as well as both clonal and sexual reproduction, aphids provide the opportunity to understand the basis of phenotypic plasticity as well as the genomic consequences of sexual versus asexual reproduction. Their alternative reproductive modes can also be exploited in genetic experiments, because clones can be maintained indefinitely in the laboratory with sexual generations induced at will1,2. Third, aphids provide some of the best studied instances of adaptation, in the form of both insecticide resistance, which has evolved through several molecular mechanisms, and host plant adaptation, which has repeatedly generated novel aphid lineages specialized to particular crop plant cultivars and which is presumably the basis for the radiation of aphids onto many specialized host plants during their long evolutionary history.