DOCSLIB.ORG

Whisper and Phonation: Aerodynamic Comparisons Across Adduction And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Whisper and Phonation: Aerodynamic Comparisons Across Adduction And WHISPER AND PHONATION: AERODYNAMIC COMPARISONS ACROSS ADDUCTION AND LOUDNESS LEVELS Ramya Mohan Konnai A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2012 Committee: Ronald C. Scherer, Advisor Lewis Fulcher Graduate Faculty Representative Roger Colcord Alexander Goberman © 2012 Ramya Konnai All Rights Reserved iii Ronald Scherer, Advisor ABSTRACT The purpose of the present project was to compare the aerodynamics of whisper and phonation. The novel aspect was to have subjects produce both whisper and phonation for nine different conditions, three qualities relative to levels of adduction (breathy, normal, and pressed) and three levels of loudness (soft, medium, and loud). The study reports subglottal pressure (Ps), airflow (F), and laryngeal flow resistance (Rf, the ratio Ps/F) for all conditions. Three males and five females between 20 and 30 years of age whispered and phonated smooth syllable strings of /baep/. This resulted in 18 treatment combinations (i.e., 3 adductions x 3 loudness levels x 2 genders). A regression analysis was performed using a Proc-mixed procedure with SAS statistical software. Results relative to laryngeal source (phonation vs. whisper): Ps was not significantly different between whisper and phonation (except for the breathy soft condition in females, where Ps was greater in phonation). Flow typically was higher for whisper than phonation (except for soft conditions, where flow was about the same). Rf tended to be greater for phonation than for whisper for females, but not for males (where Rf was about the same between phonation and whisper). Results relative to loudness: Ps increased with loudness (soft, medium, loud) at each of the three adduction levels for both phonation and whisper. Flow tended to increase with loudness in whisper at each level of adduction, but flow results were varied for phonation. In phonation, Rf increased with loudness at each level of adduction, but there was no general pattern for whisper (being relatively constant across loudness levels for each gender). iv Results relative to adduction: Ps increased from normal to breathy to pressed at each level of loudness for phonation, and similarly for whisper (except Ps was about the same for normal and breathy whisper productions). Breathy adduction had the greatest flow at each level of loudness for both phonation and whisper. Flow was about the same in both phonation and whisper for normal and pressed productions. Rf increased from breathy to normal to pressed at each level of loudness (although for whisper, Rf was similar for breathy and normal productions) Results relative to gender: Ps tended to be higher in males than females for all nine conditions for phonation and whisper. Males tended to have greater flow for phonation but lower flow for whisper for all conditions. Males produced greater Rf values for whisper across adduction, but lower Rf values (relatively small differences, however) for phonation across adduction levels. While there are some clear and understandable trends for the aerodynamic measures relative to changes in loudness and adduction for whisper, phonation, and gender, the results are best taken as testable hypotheses for future research. v This dissertation is dedicated to: The memory of my beloved grandfather, M. Elumalai. You encouraged me to pursue my dreams. My husband, Asai. You make my dreams come true! vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project would not have been possible without the guidance of Dr. Scherer, my advisor. Dr. Scherer, you took a genuine interest in my learning and challenged me in my academic program. I will always remember our lengthy brainstorming discussions (not necessarily all the content), the long hours spent making figures on excel, and above all our ability to laugh away even at the eleventh hour of meeting a deadline. You taught me not just about the larynx but lessons for life. Thank you! Sincere thanks to my committee members- Dr. Goberman, Dr. Colcord, and Dr. Fulcher for their time and input on my project. I am grateful to Amy Peplinski and Dr. Kenneth Ryan from the Statistical Consulting Center, BGSU for their immense help with the data analysis. A big “Thank you” to Jason Whitfield for assisting me with data collection. Special thanks to Dr. Fari Alipour, University of Iowa, for providing solutions with technology issues in the lab whenever we needed. Thanks also go to Dr. Hewitt for supporting my transition from University of Cincinnati and helping me throughout my program at BGSU. I am thankful to the College of Health Sciences and the Graduate College, BGSU and University of Cincinnati for the financial support of my education. I am indebted to my husband, Asai, for being patient, supporting, and encouraging throughout this tough and long journey. Special thanks to my son, Aarya, for bringing absolute joy into my life and constantly reminding me to enjoy the simple moments every day! I cannot thank my brother and parents enough for all their care and support throughout my life. Thanks to my cohorts- Haidee Tan, Biji Philip, Emily Rusnak, Scott Palasik, Eric Swartz, Farzan Irani, Charlie Hughes, and Stephanie Hughes for lending their ears day and night and helping me to get to the end of this program. Friends, Sabiha Parveen, Purnima Gopalakrishnan, Siva “akka,” vii Sethu Karthikeyan, and Vijay Ramachandra deserve special thanks for accommodating my needs at Bowling Green when I needed it the most. Thanks also go to friends from Cincinnati, Venkat, Prodipto, Ritesh, Renuka, Anu “didi”, Rohit, and Chris for making me feel at home when I was 10,000 miles away from home. Last but not the least, thanks to Dr. Alice Silbergleit, Henry Ford Health System for her encouraging comments and being flexible with my work schedule. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………1 1.1 Phonation types ...........................................................................................1 1.2 Whisper vs. phonation.................................................................................3 1.3 Significance of whisper ..............................................................................3 1.4 Loudness and intensity ...............................................................................5 1.5 Aerodynamics .............................................................................................6 1.6 Whisper characteristics ...............................................................................9 1.7 Proposed research .....................................................................................13 CHAPTER 2. METHODOLOGY .....................................................................................14 2.1 Subjects ....................................................................................................14 2.2 Equipment .................................................................................................14 2.3 Syllables for analysis ................................................................................15 2.4 Procedure ..................................................................................................15 2.5 Data analysis .............................................................................................20 2.6 Significance ..............................................................................................22 CHAPTER 3. RESULTS .................................................................................................23 3.1 Research question 1 ..................................................................................30 3.2 Within-subject and between-subjects variability ......................................42 3.3 Research question 2 ..................................................................................44 3.4 Research question 3 ..................................................................................55 3.5 Values for variables ..................................................................................65 ix CHAPTER 4. DISCUSSION ...........................................................................................66 4.1 Subglottal pressure ....................................................................................66 4.2 Airflow .....................................................................................................69 4.3 Flow resistance ........................................................................................72 4.4 Other observations ....................................................................................74 CHAPTER 5. SUMMARY ..............................................................................................75 CHAPTER 6. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................90 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................95 APPENDIX I. Table of physical characteristics of subjects............................................105 APPENDIX II. Flow mask and oral pressure calibrations ..............................................106 APPENDIX III. Figures of pressure vs. flow for each subject ........................................113 APPENDIX IV. Consent form.........................................................................................133 x LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Proc Mixed Model Terms for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Larynx Anatomy
    LARYNX ANATOMY Elena Rizzo Riera R1 ORL HUSE INTRODUCTION v Odd and median organ v Infrahyoid region v Phonation, swallowing and breathing v Triangular pyramid v Postero- superior base àpharynx and hyoid bone v Bottom point àupper orifice of the trachea INTRODUCTION C4-C6 Tongue – trachea In women it is somewhat higher than in men. Male Female Length 44mm 36mm Transverse diameter 43mm 41mm Anteroposterior diameter 36mm 26mm SKELETAL STRUCTURE Framework: 11 cartilages linked by joints and fibroelastic structures 3 odd-and median cartilages: the thyroid, cricoid and epiglottis cartilages. 4 pair cartilages: corniculate cartilages of Santorini, the cuneiform cartilages of Wrisberg, the posterior sesamoid cartilages and arytenoid cartilages. Intrinsic and extrinsic muscles THYROID CARTILAGE Shield shaped cartilage Right and left vertical laminaà laryngeal prominence (Adam’s apple) M:90º F: 120º Children: intrathyroid cartilage THYROID CARTILAGE Outer surface à oblique line Inner surface Superior border à superior thyroid notch Inferior border à inferior thyroid notch Superior horns à lateral thyrohyoid ligaments Inferior horns à cricothyroid articulation THYROID CARTILAGE The oblique line gives attachement to the following muscles: ¡ Thyrohyoid muscle ¡ Sternothyroid muscle ¡ Inferior constrictor muscle Ligaments attached to the thyroid cartilage ¡ Thyroepiglottic lig ¡ Vestibular lig ¡ Vocal lig CRICOID CARTILAGE Complete signet ring Anterior arch and posterior lamina Ridge and depressions Cricothyroid articulation
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Laryngeal Features
    6. Laryngeal features Before you study this chapter, check whether you are familiar with the following terms: allomorph, allophone, aspiration, devoicing, frequency, glottalization, glottal stop, glottis, hiatus, larynx, organs of speech, phoneme, pulmonic egressive airstream, root, sibilant, suffix, syllabic consonant, utterance, vocal cords/folds, voice assimilation, voiced, voiceless, voicing In this chapter we take a look at the articulatory role of the glottis, the vocal cords/folds and all the different phenomena that are related to the operation of the larynx. This includes voicing and voicelessness, (a comparison of English and Hungarian) voice assimilation, devoicing, aspiration and glottalization, and the effect of voicelessness on preceding vowels, Pre-fortis Clipping. Recall from Chapter 1 that the basic mechanism that is used to produce speech sounds in English and Hungarian is a pulmonic egressive airstream mechanism. Having left the lungs, the air continues upward in the windpipe up to the larynx – the front, shield-like part of which is called Adam's apple – then into the pharynx and the supraglottal cavities, the oral and nasal cavities. In the larynx it has to pass between the vocal cords/folds, two bundles of muscle, which may produce numerous different effects. Before discussing these, let us take a look at the structure and parts of the larynx and their different configurations. As it can be seen in the diagram, the larynx consists of some cartilages – one fixed in the front and two movable ones in the back, plus one more on the top not shown in the diagram, the epiglottis, which can close the windpipe, and a circular one serving as the frame for the larynx –, the Laryngeal features vocal cords connecting the cartilages, and the opening between them, the glottis.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Larynx (Voice Box) Works
    How the Larynx (Voice Box) Works Charles R. Larson, PhD If you love opera, or if you admire the voices of pop singers such as Celine Dion or Barbra Streisand, you may have wondered how it is these marvelous singers are able to create such beautiful music with this instrument we call the human voice. You may also know of someone who has a bad voice or has had to have their voice box, or larynx, removed because of illness or injury. The larynx is a critical organ of human speech and singing, and it serves important biological functions as well. Let's have a look at the larynx to understand its functions, what it looks like and how it works. It is thought that the same factors that favored the evolution of air‐breathing animals on earth led to the evolution of the larynx. Lungs are comprised of very delicate tissues that must be maintained within strict biological limits, that is, temperature, humidity and freedom from foreign particles. Thus, along with the first air‐breathing animals, there appeared a primitive sort of larynx, whose one and only function was protection of the lung. This function remains the most important of those the larynx has assumed in subsequent evolutionary developments. Now, of course we recognize that the larynx is critical for human speech and singing. But we also should realize that the larynx is important for swallowing, coughing, vomiting and eliminating contents of the abdomen. If you have ever felt your 'Adam's Apple', then you know where the larynx is.
    [Show full text]
  • Larynx 2017‐2018 Naaccr Webinar Series
    NAACCR 2017-2018 Webinar Series 11/2/2017 COLLECTING CANCER DATA: LARYNX 2017‐2018 NAACCR WEBINAR SERIES Q&A • Please submit all questions concerning webinar content through the Q&A panel. • Reminder: • If you have participants watching this webinar at your site, please collect their names and emails. • We will be distributing a Q&A document in about one week. This document will fully answer questions asked during the webinar and will contain any corrections that we may discover after the webinar. 2 Larynx 1 NAACCR 2017-2018 Webinar Series 11/2/2017 Fabulous Prizes 3 AGENDA • Anatomy • Epi Moment • Quiz 1 • Staging • Treatment • Quiz 2 • Case Scenarios 4 Larynx 2 NAACCR 2017-2018 Webinar Series 11/2/2017 ANATOMY LARYNX 5 LARYNX ANATOMY • Voice Box • Passageway of air • Extends from C3 to C6 vertebrae 6 Larynx 3 NAACCR 2017-2018 Webinar Series 11/2/2017 LARYNX ANATOMY • Divided into 3 Sections • Supraglottis • area above vocal cords, contains epiglottis • arytenoids, aryepiglottic folds and false cords • Glottis • containing true vocal cords, anterior and posterior commissures • Subglottis • below the vocal cords 7 LARYNX ANATOMY • Epiglottis • Aryepiglottic Folds • Anterior and Posterior • False vocal cords Commissure • True vocal cords • Arytenoids 8 Larynx 4 NAACCR 2017-2018 Webinar Series 11/2/2017 LARYNX ANATOMY • Thyroid cartilage • Arytenoid cartilage • Adam’s apple • Influence position and tension of the • Thyrohyoid membrane vocal cords • Cricoid cartilage • Corniculate cartilage • Inferior wall of larynx • Horn shaped pieces located
    [Show full text]
  • Epiglottis Reconstruction with Auricular Free Flap For
    ISSN: 2572-4193 Bottini et al. J Otolaryngol Rhinol 2017, 3:032 DOI: 10.23937/2572-4193.1510032 Volume 3 | Issue 2 Journal of Open Access Otolaryngology and Rhinology CASE REPORT Epiglottis Reconstruction with Auricular Free Flap for Re- habilitation of Dysphagia: A Case Study Battista Bottini G1*, Brandtner C1, Rasp G2 and Gaggl A1 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital, Private Medical University Paracelsus, Austria 2Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, University Hospital, Private Medical University Paracelsus, Check for updates Austria *Corresponding author: Gian Battista Bottini, MD, DMD, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Uni- versity Hospital, Private Medical University Paracelsus, 48 Muellner Hauptstrasse, 5020 Salzburg, Austria, Tel: +43(0)57255-57230, Fax: +43(0)57255-26499, E-mail: [email protected] and requires a coordinated activity of nerves, muscles, Abstract the hyoid bone and the larynx [1]. The process can be Supraglottic laryngectomy for laryngeal cancer aims to remove divided in stages: oral pharyngeal and oesophageal [1]. cancer of the larynx whilst preserving its functions of airway protection, breathing and voice production. A well-known long- During the pharyngeal stage, the vocal cords adduct term complication of this procedure is aspiration. to seal the glottis and the arytenoid tilt forward to con- We present a case of a delayed epiglottis reconstruction tact the epiglottis base. with auricular free flap for surgical rehabilitation of dyspha- gia. Primarily the patient underwent supraglottic laryngecto- When the hyo-laryngeal complex is pulled in anterior my, bilateral neck dissection and radiotherapy. She had a and superior direction against the base of the tongue, permanent tracheostoma because of a complete paralysis the epiglottis, acting like a shield, tilts backwards and of the right vocal cord and a residual minimal mobility of the covers completely the glottis [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Learning [Voice]
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations Fall 2010 Learning [Voice] Joshua Ian Tauberer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the First and Second Language Acquisition Commons Recommended Citation Tauberer, Joshua Ian, "Learning [Voice]" (2010). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 288. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/288 Please see my home page, http://razor.occams.info, for the data files and scripts that make this reproducible research. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/288 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Learning [Voice] Abstract The [voice] distinction between homorganic stops and fricatives is made by a number of acoustic correlates including voicing, segment duration, and preceding vowel duration. The present work looks at [voice] from a number of multidimensional perspectives. This dissertation's focus is a corpus study of the phonetic realization of [voice] in two English-learning infants aged 1;1--3;5. While preceding vowel duration has been studied before in infants, the other correlates of post-vocalic voicing investigated here --- preceding F1, consonant duration, and closure voicing intensity --- had not been measured before in infant speech. The study makes empirical contributions regarding the development of the production of [voice] in infants, not just from a surface- level perspective but also with implications for the phonetics-phonology interface in the adult and developing linguistic systems. Additionally, several methodological contributions will be made in the use of large sized corpora and data modeling techniques. The study revealed that even in infants, F1 at the midpoint of a vowel preceding a voiced consonant was lower by roughly 50 Hz compared to a vowel before a voiceless consonant, which is in line with the effect found in adults.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerodynamic and Durational Cues of Phonological Voicing in Whisper Yohann Meynadier, Yulia Gaydina
    Aerodynamic and durational cues of phonological voicing in whisper Yohann Meynadier, Yulia Gaydina To cite this version: Yohann Meynadier, Yulia Gaydina. Aerodynamic and durational cues of phonological voicing in whisper. Interspeech, Aug 2013, Lyon, France. pp.335-339. hal-01211117 HAL Id: hal-01211117 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01211117 Submitted on 5 Oct 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Aerodynamic and durational cues of phonological voicing in whisper Yohann Meynadier, Yulia Gaydina Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS UMR 7309, LPL, Aix-en-Provence, France [email protected], [email protected] consonants and pre-consonant vowels has long been observed: Abstract (i) vowels are longer before voiced than before voiceless This paper presents analyses on the phonological voicing consonants and, (ii) voiceless obstruents are longer than contrast in whispered speech, which is characterized by the voiced ones [2], see [35, 36] for a review. absence of vocal fold vibrations. In modal speech, besides While the voiced-voiceless difference in duration of pre- glottal vibration, the contrast between voiced and unvoiced consonantal vowels is not still well understood [2, 37, 38], the consonants is realized by other phonetic correlates: e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Larynx Prof
    The Larynx Prof. Dr.Mohammed Hisham Al-Muhtaseb The Larynx • Extends from the middle of C3 vertebra till the level of the lower border of C6 • Continue as Trachea • Above it opens into the laryngo-pharynx • Suspended from the hyoid bone above and attached to the trachea below by membranes and ligaments Functions • 1. acts as an open valve in respiration • 2. Acts as a closed valve in deglutition • 3. Acts as a partially closed valve in the production of voice • 4. During cough it is first closed and then open suddenly to release compressed air Parts • 1. Cartilage • 2. Mucosa • 3. Ligaments • 4. Muscles Cartilage • A. Single : Epiglottis Cricoid Thyroid B. Pairs: Arytenoid Cuneiform Corniculate Cricoid cartilage • The most inferior of the laryngeal cartilages • Completely encircles the airway • Shaped like a 'signet ring' • Broad lamina of cricoid cartilage posterior • Much narrower arch of cricoid cartilage circling anteriorly. Cricoid cartilage • Posterior surface of the lamina has two oval depressions separated by a ridge • The esophagus is attached to the ridge • Depressions are for attachment of the posterior crico-arytenoid muscles. • Has two articular facets on each side • One facet is on the sloping superolateral surface and articulates with the base of an arytenoid cartilage; • The other facet is on the lateral surface near its base and is for articulation with the inferior horn of the thyroid cartilage Thyroid cartilage • The largest of the laryngeal cartilages • It is formed by a right and a left lamina • Widely separated posteriorly,
    [Show full text]
  • Laryngeal Physiology and Terminology in CCM Singing
    Faculty of Education Ingvild Vestfall Master’s thesis Laryngeal physiology and terminology in CCM singing A thesis investigating research on the underlying laryngeal physiology of CCM singing techniques, and experiences of teaching CCM genres to adolescents Stemmefysiologi og terminologi i CCM/rytmisk sang En studie av forskning på stemmefysiologi knyttet til sangteknikker i CCM/rytmiske sjangere, og erfaringer med å undervise ungdommer i CCM/rytmisk sang Master in Culture and Language 2018 Consent to lending by University College Library YES ☒ NO ☐ Consent to accessibility in digital archive Brage YES ☒ NO ☐ ii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS.................................................................................................................. III LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................... V LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ VI ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................. VII SAMMENDRAG (IN NORWEGIAN) .............................................................................................. VIII PREFACE ..................................................................................................................................... IX 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • English Is a Purely [Spread Glottis] Language
    English is a purely [spread glottis] language Dániel Huber (Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris 3, France) & Katalin Balogné Bérces (PPKE University, Piliscsaba, Hungary) Aims: to show that: the received view, that English has a phonological opposition between voiceless and voiced obstruents, is mistaken (spelling?? other (truly voice) languages??) the correct characterization of the opposition: aspirated ([spread glottis] – [sg] for short) vs. unaspirated using a privative [sg] feature not only for plosives, but fricatives, too London, 14-17 July 2009 ICLCE3 2 Aims: to account for: the “lack” of aspiration in tautosyllabic s+C[obs] the devoicing of the sonorant in both C[sg]+C[son] and s+C[son] the "devoicing" of non-intersonorant lenis stops "bidirectional voice assimilation" the identical distribution of plosive aspiration and the segment /h/ London, 14-17 July 2009 ICLCE3 3 Laryngeal systems one-way contrast two-way contrast + three/four-way contrast... London, 14-17 July 2009 ICLCE3 4 Two-way laryngeal contrast in obstruents: [voice] vs. [spread glottis] languages* ("laryngeal realism" – Honeybone 2005): in what follows: arguments that voice and aspiration ([sg]) are two totally different mechanisms defining the two types of system and incompatible within two-way systems * cf. Iverson & Salmons 1995 (and subsequent publications), etc. London, 14-17 July 2009 ICLCE3 5 Two totally different mechanisms voice totally inactive in [sg] languages (English, German, etc.): no assimilation! instead: "bidirectional devoicing": => nothing happens!
    [Show full text]
  • States of the Glottis for Voiceless Plosives
    STATES OF THE GLOTTIS FOR VOICELESS PLOSIVES Jimmy G. Harris University of Victoria, Canada ABSTRACT stricture and the voicing onset of the following vowel has been While the state of glottis of voiceless aspirated stops has been called Voice Onset Time (VOT). The results of the VOT studies well documented, the state of the glottis of voiceless unaspirated have added another important acoustic dimension to the study of stops has not. We have therefore concentrated on the states of the overlapping stricture release phase of oral stops and the glottis of voiceless unaspirated stops including glottal stop. stricture closing (or onset) phase of following voiced vowels. Breath and nil phonation are traditionally regarded as the The results concerning voiceless oral stops point to a direct phonation types of voicelessness. Catford has described both as correlation between the degree of opening of the glottis and the having a wide open glottis, but differing in airflow turbulence. amount of positive VOT lag. The wider open they are, the longer By contrast, stops made with either the glottis closed or no air the VOT lag. passing through it he termed ÒunphonatedÓ. We consider existing Our purpose in this article is to provide a more detailed and definitions of nil phonation, breath, and unphonated to be systematic description of the states of the glottis during the inappropriate for describing the state of the glottis during the closure phase of the articulatory strictures of voiceless articulatory stricture phase of voiceless unaspirated oral stops. unaspirated oral stops and glottal stop. We have mainly limited We describe that state of the glottis and propose the term our discussion to our fiberoptic laryngoscopy study of the states prephonation be used to refer to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Ingressive Phonation in Contemporary Vocal Music, Works by Helmut Lachenmann, Georges Aperghis, Michael Baldwin, and Nicholas
    © 2012 Amanda DeBoer Bartlett All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Jane Schoonmaker Rodgers, Advisor The use of ingressive phonation (inward singing) in contemporary vocal music is becoming more frequent, yet there is limited research on the physiological demands, risks, and pedagogical requirements of the various ingressive phonation techniques. This paper will discuss ingressive phonation as it is used in contemporary vocal music. The research investigates the ways in which ingressive phonation differs acoustically, physiologically, and aesthetically from typical (egressive) phonation, and explores why and how composers and performers use the various ingressive vocal techniques. Using non-invasive methods, such as electroglottograph waveforms, aerodynamic (pressure, flow, flow resistance) measures, and acoustic analyses of recorded singing, specific data about ingressive phonation were obtained, and various categories of vocal techniques were distinguished. Results are presented for basic vocal exercises and tasks, as well as for specific excerpts from the repertoire, including temA by Helmut Lachenmann and Ursularia by Nicholas DeMaison. The findings of this study were applied to a discussion surrounding pedagogical and aesthetic applications of ingressive phonation in contemporary art music intended for concert performance. Topics of this discussion include physical differences in the production and performance of ingressive phonation, descriptive information regarding the various techniques, as well as notational and practical recommendations for composers. iv This document is dedicated to: my husband, Tom Bartlett my parents, John and Gail DeBoer and my siblings, Mike, Matt, and Leslie DeBoer Thank you for helping me laugh through the process – at times ingressively – and for supporting me endlessly. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I have endless gratitude for my advisor and committee chair, Dr.
    [Show full text]