DOCSLIB.ORG

SETTLEMENT; MEMORANDUM of 21 POINTS and AUTHORITIES Defendants

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SETTLEMENT; MEMORANDUM of 21 POINTS and AUTHORITIES Defendants 1 Xavier Becerra Attorney General of California 2 Kathleen Foote Senior Assistant Attorney General 3 Michael Jorgenson Supervising Deputy Attorney General 4 Cheryl Lee Johnson (SBN 66321) Esther La (SBN 160706) 5 Emilio Varanini (SBN 163952) Deputy Attorneys General 6 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 7 Tel 415.510.3541 / Fax 415.703.5480 E-mail: [email protected] 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff, People of the State of California 9 Richard L. Grossman (SBN 112841) 10 Philip L. Pillsbury Jr. (SBN 072261) Pillsbury & Coleman, LLP 11 600 Montgomery Street, 31st Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 12 Tel 415.433.8000 / Fax 415.433.4816 Email: [email protected] 13 Lead Counsel for Plaintiff UFCW & Employers Benefit Trust and the Class (Additional Counsel not listed) 14 15 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 16 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 17 UFCW & Employers Benefit Trust, on behalf Case No. CGC 14-538451 of itself and all others similarly situated Consolidated with 18 Case No. CGC-18-565398 Plaintiffs, 19 vs. NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR 20 PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF Sutter Health, et al., SETTLEMENT; MEMORANDUM OF 21 POINTS AND AUTHORITIES Defendants. (REDACTED) 22 Date: February 25, 2020 23 People of the State of California, ex. rel. Time: 10:00 a.m. Xavier Becerra, Dept.: 304 24 Hon. Anne-Christine Massullo Plaintiff, 25 Action Filed: April 7, 2014 vs. 26 PUBLIC – REDACTS MATERIAL FROM Sutter Health, CONDITIONALLY SEALED RECORD 27 Defendant. 28 Farella Braun + Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 (415) 954-4400 MOT. FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT; MPA - Case No. CGC 14-538451 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION ...........................................................................................7 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................8 4 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................9 5 A. Procedural History ......................................................................................................9 6 B. Settlement Negotiations ...........................................................................................11 7 C. The Settlement Agreement and Proposed Final Judgment ......................................11 8 D. Proposed Plans of Notice, Allocation, and Distribution ..........................................16 9 LEGAL STANDARD ......................................................................................................................19 10 ARGUMENT ...................................................................................................................................21 11 I. THE SETTLEMENT IS THE PRODUCT OF SERIOUS, INFORMED, 12 NONCOLLUSIVE NEGOTIATIONS. ...............................................................................21 13 II. THE SETTLEMENT IS INDISPUTABLY WITHIN THE RANGE OF POSSIBLE APPROVAL. ........................................................................................................................23 14 A. Plaintiffs’ All-Cash Monetary Recovery Is Substantial. ..........................................23 15 B. The Injunctive Relief Also Warrants Preliminary Approval. ..................................24 16 C. The Costs, Risks, and Length of Trial and Appeal Favor Preliminary 17 Approval. ..................................................................................................................25 18 III. THE COURT SHOULD APPROVE PLAINTIFFS’ PROPOSED PLAN OF NOTICE AND CLAIM FORM. ..........................................................................................28 19 A. Plaintiffs’ Proposed Form and Plan of Notice Adequately Apprise Class 20 Members of the Settlement Terms and the Available Options. ...............................28 21 B. The Proposed Plan of Allocation Fairly Distributes the Settlement Fund. ..............31 22 C. The Proposed Plan of Distribution Provides a Fair Opportunity to Submit Claims and Informs Class Members of the Consequences of Not Doing So. ..........32 23 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................33 24 25 26 27 28 Farella Braun + Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 2 (415) 954-4400 MPA ISO MOT. FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT - Case No. CGC 14-538451 1 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES 2 Page(s) 3 FEDERAL CASES 4 In re Am. Bank Note Holographics, Inc., 5 127 F. Supp. 2d 418 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) ........................................................................................27 6 In re Baby Prods. Antitrust Litig., 708 F.3d 163 (3rd Cir. 2013) ......................................................................................................24 7 In re Bluetooth Headset Prod. Liab. Litig., 8 654 F.3d 935 (9th Cir. 2011) ......................................................................................................22 9 Bui v. Sprint Corp., 2016 WL 727163 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2016) ..............................................................................29 10 11 California v. eBay, Inc., 2014 WL 4273888 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2014) ...........................................................................22 12 Carnegie v. Household Int’l, Inc., 13 445 F. Supp. 2d 1032 (N.D. Ill. 2006) .......................................................................................23 14 In re: Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig., 2015 WL 9266493 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2015) .....................................................................31, 32 15 16 Chun-Hoon v. McKee Foods Corp., 716 F. Supp. 2d 848 (N.D. Cal. 2010) .......................................................................................22 17 In re: CRT Antitrust Litig., 18 2016 WL 3648478 (N.D. Cal. July 7, 2016) ..............................................................................24 19 Cty. of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co., 907 F.2d 1295 (2d Cir. 1990) .....................................................................................................23 20 In re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust Litig., 21 2006 WL 3247396 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 8, 2006) .............................................................................24 22 Denney v. Deutsche Bank AG, 23 443 F.3d 253 (2d Cir. 2006) .......................................................................................................30 24 Detroit v. Grinnell Corp., 495 F.2d 448 (2d Cir. 1974) .......................................................................................................23 25 Glass v. UBS Fin. Servs., Inc., 26 2007 WL 221862 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2007), aff’d, 331 Fed. Appx. 452 (9th Cir. 27 2009) ...........................................................................................................................................24 28 Farella Braun + Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 3 (415) 954-4400 MPA ISO MOT. FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT - Case No. CGC 14-538451 1 Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006) ...................................................................................................................30 2 In re Ikon Office Solutions, Inc., 3 194 F.R.D. 166 (E.D. Pa. 2000) .................................................................................................27 4 Jaffe v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., 5 2008 WL 346417 (N.D. Cal., Feb. 7, 2008) ...............................................................................32 6 Klein v. O’Neal, Inc., 705 F. Supp. 2d 632 (N.D. Tex. 2010) .......................................................................................31 7 In re Lorazepam Antitrust Litig., 8 205 F.R.D. 369 (D.D.C. 2002) .............................................................................................22, 23 9 Low v. Trump Univ., LLC, 10 246 F. Supp. 3d 1295 (S.D. Cal. 2017) ..........................................................................20, 22, 24 11 Low v. Trump Univ., LLC, 881 F.3d 1111 (9th Cir. 2018) ....................................................................................................... 12 Montoya v. PNC Bank, N.A., 13 2016 WL 1529902 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 13, 2016) .............................................................................25 14 In Re: N.C.A.A. Athletic Grant-In-Aid Cap Antitrust Litig., 15 2017 WL 6040065 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2017), aff’d, 768 F. App’x 651 (9th Cir. 2019) ...........................................................................................................................................24 16 In re Omnivision Techs., Inc., 17 559 F. Supp. 2d 1036 (N.D. Cal. 2008) ...............................................................................24, 32 18 In re Optical Disk Drive Prods. Antitrust Litig., 2016 WL 7364803 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2016) ...........................................................................33 19 In re Payment Card Interchange Fee & Merch. Disc. Antitrust Litig., 20 330 F.R.D. 11 (E.D.N.Y. 2019) ...........................................................................................25, 26 21 Rieckborn v. Velti PLC, 22 2015 WL 468329 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2015) ................................................................................31 23 Rodriguez v. West Publ’g Corp., 563 F.3d 948 (9th Cir. 2009) ................................................................................................23,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BOMA Bulletin Marble West Mcmillan Electric Co
    SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2006 www.bomasf.org B OMA S a n F r a n c i s c o a d v a n c e s t h e c o m m e r c i a l r e a l e s t a t e i n d u s t r y t h r o u g h a d v o c a c y , p r o f e s s i o n a l d e v e l o p m e n t , a n d i n f o r m a t i o n e x c h a n g e Support our Associate Members: Buying BOMA Benefits Us All By Kathy Mattes, CPM, CCIM, Flynn Properties Inc. On the Inside good portion of our membership and involved with the local BOMAs there, has spent the past few months as well. If I’m doing business elsewhere working on their 2007 budgets. and don’t know the market but need some ELMER JOHNSON RECAP This process, arduous as it may seem, assistance, I know where to turn. And • •• 4 •• • reminds us where we spend our valuable that’s comforting. Adollars, and what expenditures give us the best return on investment. As a Principal Our Associate members are a great UILDING OUR 2006 B T BOMA member, I know the value received resource to BOMA San Francisco. • •• 6 •• • for my dues investment. I know that, as a Associate members contribute not only result of BOMA’s advocacy efforts, my dues and sponsorship support to our dues of approximately $0.01638 activities; they also actively CALENDAR per square foot per year saves serve on many committees that • •• 7 •• • 1.54 per square foot per year in do the work of our association.
    [Show full text]
  • Mckesson HBOC, Inc. Securities Litigation 99-CV-20743-US District
    US District Court Civil Docket as of February 8, 2013 Retrieved from the court on February 11, 2013 U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Jose) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:99-cv-20743-RMW Aronson, et al v. McKesson HBOC, Inc., et al Date Filed: 04/28/1999 Assigned to: Judge Ronald M. Whyte Date Terminated: 03/26/2008 Referred to: Magistrate Judge Patricia V. Trumbull Jury Demand: Both Demand: $0 Nature of Suit: 850 Case in other court: Ninth Circuit, 06-15987 Securities/Commodities Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act Jurisdiction: Federal Question Plaintiff Andrew Aronson represented by D. Brian Hufford on behalf of himself and all others Pomerantz Haudek Block Grossman & similarly situated Gross LLP 100 Park Ave 26th Flr New York, NY 10017-5516 (212) 661-1100 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Daniel L. Berger Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann 1285 Avenue of the Americas 33rd Flr New York, NY 10019 (212) 554-1400 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Gerald J. Rodos Barrack Rodos & Bacine 2001 Market St 3300 Two Commerce Sq Philadelphia, PA 19103 (215) 963-0600 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jeffrey W. Golan Barrack Rodos & Bacine 2001 Market St 3300 Two Commerce Sq Philadelphia, PA 19103 (215) 963-0600 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Joseph J. Tabacco , Jr. Berman DeValerio One California Street Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94111 415-433-3200 Fax: 415-433-6382 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Leonard Barrack Barrack Rodos & Bacine 2001 Market St 3300 Two Commerce Sq Philadelphia, PA 19103 (215) 963-0600 Email: [email protected] LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Max W.
    [Show full text]
  • November 23, 2004 Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal
    November 23, 2004 By ELECTRONIC FILING Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Written Ex Parte Presentation, Unbundled Access to Network Elements; Review ofthe Section 251 Unbundling Obligations ofIncumbent Local Exchange Carriers, WC Docket No. 04-313, CC Docket No. 01-338 Dear Ms. Dortch: On November 16, 2004, Verizon filed an ex parte letter in this docket, attaching a recent filing by MCI in a California state regulatory proceeding. As Verizon expressly acknowledges, MCI's pleading was submitted in response to a request by the California Public Utilities Commission "for comment on whether it should revise traditional retail regulation of ILECs.,,1 Verizon contends that this filing amounts to an admission by MCI "that the arguments it advanced in this proceeding no longer are valid,,2 - a claim that misstates the facts and ignores the context in which the California pleading was filed. Even a cursory review of the MCI submission shows that MCI did not contradict the facts or contentions that it has advanced in this proceeding concerning the state of intermodal competition. More fundamentally, the California proceeding and this Commission's pending Triennial Remand proceeding involve very different issues. The California Public Utilities Commission is examining in two concurrent proceedings the retail regulatory framework applicable to the state's foremost ILECs, and the application of intrastate switched access charges. In the instant proceeding, the FCC is charged with examining impairment in the absence ofthe availability of Letter from Dee May, Verizon, to Marlene H. Dortch, FCC, WC Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • Y\5$ in History
    THE GARGOYLES OF SAN FRANCISCO: MEDIEVALIST ARCHITECTURE IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 1900-1940 A thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University A5 In partial fulfillment of The Requirements for The Degree Mi ST Master of Arts . Y\5$ In History by James Harvey Mitchell, Jr. San Francisco, California May, 2016 Copyright by James Harvey Mitchell, Jr. 2016 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read The Gargoyles of San Francisco: Medievalist Architecture in Northern California 1900-1940 by James Harvey Mitchell, Jr., and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History at San Francisco State University. <2 . d. rbel Rodriguez, lessor of History Philip Dreyfus Professor of History THE GARGOYLES OF SAN FRANCISCO: MEDIEVALIST ARCHITECTURE IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 1900-1940 James Harvey Mitchell, Jr. San Francisco, California 2016 After the fire and earthquake of 1906, the reconstruction of San Francisco initiated a profusion of neo-Gothic churches, public buildings and residential architecture. This thesis examines the development from the novel perspective of medievalism—the study of the Middle Ages as an imaginative construct in western society after their actual demise. It offers a selection of the best known neo-Gothic artifacts in the city, describes the technological innovations which distinguish them from the medievalist architecture of the nineteenth century, and shows the motivation for their creation. The significance of the California Arts and Crafts movement is explained, and profiles are offered of the two leading medievalist architects of the period, Bernard Maybeck and Julia Morgan.
    [Show full text]
  • Buletin Oficial
    AGENŢIA DE STAT PENTRU PROTECŢIA PROPRIETĂŢII INDUSTRIALE CHIŞINĂU - REPUBLICA MOLDOVA BULETIN OFICIAL DE PROPRIETATE INDUSTRIALĂ Oficial journal on industrial property 1995 Publicat la 31 mai 1995 Atenţie - abonarea ! Continuă abonarea la Buletinul Oficial de Proprietate Industrială. Indicele publicaţiei - 22200 Vă puteţi abona la orice oficiu poştal din Republica Moldova. în atenţia mandatarilor autorizaţi şi solicitanţilor străini începând cu 1 ianuarie 1995 contul bancă valută forte al AGEPI este: 840071026/840, Banca Socială. AVIZ BOPI oferă persoanelor interesate spaţiu pentru reclamă şi publicitate în condiţii avantajoase. Redacţia Relaţii la tel.: 44-02-55(4) 47-61-49 2 Buletin Oficial de Proprietate Industrială CUPRINS Informaţie generală 5,76 I. Invenţii 7,78 Cereri de brevet 9,80 Brevete de invenţii acordate 11^1 Lista brevetelor de invenţii acordate, aranjate în ordinea numerelor de brevet Lista brevetelor de invenţii acordate, aranjate în ordinea clasificării inter­ Nr. 5 naţionale Modificări intervenite în statutul ju­ ridic al cererilor de brevet de invenţii 31 mai 1995 sau al brevetelor acordate Decăderi Agenţia de Stat II. Modele de utilitate 23,92 pentru Cereri de înregistrare 25,94 Modele de utilitate înregistrate Protecţia Proprietăţii Lista modelelor de utilitate în­ registrate, aranjate în ordinea nu­ Industriale mărului de certificat Modificări intervenite în statutul ju­ Str. Andrei Doga, 24, bloc 1 ridic al modelelor de utilitate Tel.: 44-01-19 Decăderi 44-02-55 (4) III. Mărci 26 47-61-49 28 Fax: 44-01-19 Cereri de înregistrare Mărci înregistrate 36 Chişinău - Republica Moldova Lista mărcilor înregistrate 68 Lista mărcilor înregistrate în R.M. pe baza certificatelor de înregistrare ale fostei U.R.S.S., aranjate în ordinea numerelor de înregistrare Lista mărcilor înregistrate în R.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Sites
    WF1 BIG BANK BRANCHES BA1 Bank of America SF Main Branch ACTION SITES 345 Montgomery Street BA2 Bank of America One Market Branch JANUARY 20, 2012 One Market Plaza, 1 Market Street BA3 Bank of America California Street Branch 50 California Street BA4 Bank of America Golden Gateway Branch 500 Battery Street BA5 Bank of America New Montgomery Branch 33 New Montgomery Street TOP SITES RECOMMENDED BY OCCUPYSF BA6 Bank of America Mortgage $ BIG BANKS 225 Bush St #130 WELLS FARGO CH1 Chase Bank California Street Branch 420 Montgomery Street 401 California Street BANK OF AMERICA CH2 Chase Bank Market Street Branch 555 California Street 700 Market Street CITIBANK CB1 Citibank International Banking Center 451 Montgomery Street 1 Sansome Street CB2 Citibank Market Street Branch JP MORGAN CHASE 590 Market Street 560 Mission Street CB3 Citibank Post Street Branch KEY WALL STREET CORPORATIONS 99 Post Street CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL ML1 Merrill Lynch California Street Branch (CAPITAL GROUP COMPANIES) 101 California St # 2575 Steuart Tower, 1 Market Street, Suite 2000 WF1 Wells Fargo Bank SF Main Branch 464 California Street CHARTIS GROUP/ AIG 1 Market Street, 36th Floor WF2 Wells Fargo Bank Bush Street Branch 225 Bush Street Suite 200 MORGAN STANLEY 555 California Street #2200 WF3 Wells Fargo Bank Crocker Branch 1 Montgomery Street GOLDMAN SACHS WF4 Wells Fargo Bank Embarcadero Center Branch 555 California Street 292 Battery Street LEHMAN BROS./BARCLAYS CAPITAL WF5 Wells Fargo Bank Kearny Street Branch 555 California Street 120 Kearny Street BEAR STEARNS
    [Show full text]
  • Meet Your 2014 Queen's Bench Board of Directors and Officers
    Queen’s Bench Bar Association Founded 1921 of the San Francisco Bay Area Winter 2014 PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE Meet Your 2014 Queen’s Bench Ready, Set, Go Board of Directors and Officers by Vanessa Hierbaum Vanessa Hierbaum, President entities, receivers and individuals. In always love the [email protected] addition to Queen’s Bench, Jaime is I b e g i n n i n g o f Vanessa has been a partner with actively involved in the Bar Association the year and the KAYE•MOSER•HIERBAUM LLP of San Francisco Barristers Club, which promise it holds for since 2007, and has practiced with comprises members in their first 10 years reflection, resolu- former KAYE•MOSER since 2000. of practice. She previously served on tion and renewed Vanessa’s practice includes all aspects the Board of Directors for the Barristers energy. As the 2014 of family law including marital dissolu- Club and assisted with creation of the President of Queen’s Bench, I hope tions, support, complex as set character- Barristers Club’s 2009, 2010 and 2011 that I, along with the rest of the Board ization and division and high conflict editions of the Pro Bono Resource and Committee Chairs, can continue custody disputes. She was named a Guide, A Guide to San Francisco Bay to harness some of that New Year vigor Northern California Super Lawyer Area Volunteer Opportunities for and energy and turn it into unstoppable Rising Star in Family Law in 2009, Lawyers and Law Firms. Jaime gradu- momentum for the duration of 2014! 2010 and 2011, and a Super Lawyer ated from the University of Colorado To that end, the Board held its an- in 2012 and 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • 3700 SF for Lease Prime San Francisco Restaurant
    ± 3,700 SF 424 Clay Street For Lease Prime San Francisco restaurant opportunity in highly trafficked Financial District Jones Lang LaSalle Brokerage, Inc. Real Estate License #: 01856260 Financial District • Highly trafficked area • Strong hotel and office driven demand: 2,500 hotel rooms and 15,534,764 SF of office space • Highly visible storefront CLUB QUARTERS HOTEL TRANSAMERICA PYRAMID • Existing liquor license • Kitchen equipment in place • Attached to a 346 room hotel • Strong partners: Blackstone owned and Club Quarters operated since 2003 • Robust neighborhood: Jackson Square, North Beach, Ferry Building • Co-tenancy: Popular restaurants such as Cotogna and Kokkari, famed galleries, and OMNI HOTEL EMBARCADERO CENTER emerging retailers such as Shinola Area Profile 0.5 miles 0.75 miles 1 mile Daytime Population 192,479 265,367 322,305 LE MERIDIEN HOTEL ONE MARITIME PLAZA DUNNE'S BROADWAY Offices NOTTINGHAM OSGOOD PL. DAVIS ST. DAVIS FRONT ST. BATTERY ST. BATTERY SANSOME ST. THE EMBARCADERO 1 444 Washington Street (415,805 SF) MONTGOMERY ST. MONTGOMERY PACIFIC AVE. 2 One Maritime Plaza (526,464 SF) ACSON 3 600 Montgomery Street (501,456 SF) SQUARE 4 655 Montgomery Street (445,500 SF) 5 1 Embarcadero Center (907,560 SF) JACKSON ST. COLUMBUS ST. 6 2 Embarcadero Center (708,300 SF) 424 Clay Street 7 3 Embarcadero Center (767,340 SF) 8 4 Embarcadero Center (973,575 SF) HOTALING PL. HOTALING 1 CUSTOM HOUSE PL. CUSTOM 9 50 California Street (703,000 SF) WASHINGTON ST. 10 100 California Street (273,988 SF) 4 2 11 505 Montgomery Street (348,000 SF) MARK TWAIN ST. MERCHANT ST.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Civic Center Historic District Cultural Landscape Inventory SITE HISTORY EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS & EVALUATION
    San Francisco Civic Center Historic District Cultural Landscape Inventory SITE HISTORY EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS & EVALUATION AUGUST 2014 815 SW 2ND AVENUE SUITE 200 | PORTLAND OR 97204 503.297.1005 | WWW.MIGCOM.COM IN ASSOCIATION WITH A+H ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING, LLC SAN FRANCISCO CIVIC CENTER HISTORIC DISTRICT CULTURAL LANDSCAPE INVENTORY CIVIC CENTER HISTORIC DISTRICT CULTURAL LANDSCAPE INVENTORY SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA PUBLICATION CREDITS COVER PHOTOS FOR MORE INFORMATION AUGUST 2014 Information in this report may be copied and used with the Clockwise from top left: c. 1945 Aerial of Civic Center (University San Francisco Planning Department Prepared by: Laurie Matthews, Rachel Edmonds, Heather condition that credit is given to authors and other contributors. of California Berkeley, WBE Collection, College of Environmental 1650 Mission Street #400 San Francisco, California 94103 Buczek & Steve Leathers, MIG, Inc., and The primary authors meet the criteria set by The Secretary of Design Library), 1945 War Memorial Court (San Francisco sfplanning.org | 415-558-6378 the Interior’s Guidelines for the Treatment of Historic Properties History Center, San Francisco Public Library), 1964 Aerial of Bridget Maley, a+h architecture + history, llc, MIG, Inc. | 815 SW 2nd Avenue, #200, Portland, Oregon 97204 for qualified professionals, as outlined in Appendix A of the Civic Center (University of California Berkeley, WBE Collection, migcom.com | 503-297-1005 with assistance from Dr. Jeffrey T. Tilman, University of Cincinnati Guide to Cultural
    [Show full text]
  • Bank of Italy Building Exhibits a Number of Original Features, Chiefly in the First Floor and Basement Banking Areas
    Form No 10-3OO (Rev. 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTME^DF*» THE NATIONAL PARK-SERVICE-SERVI NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS QNAME HISTORIC Bank of Italy RiiHdlng AND/OR COMMON Clay -Montgomery Building LOCATION STREETS. NUMBER 552 Montgomery Street _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT San Francisco __. VICINITY DF STATE CODE COUNTY CODE California 06 San Francisco 075 HCLASSIFI c ATI ON CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE _ DISTRICT _ PUBLIC X-OCCUPIED _ AGRICULTURE _ MUSEUM X-BUILDING(S) 2LPRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED X-COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESb _ EDUCATIONAL _ PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE _ ENTERTAINMENT _ RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS — YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC _ BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY —OTHER QjOWNER OF PROPERTY (Contact: Jean Hagen, Manager of Properties) NAME The Lurie .Cc/mroanx- STREET & NUMBER 555 California Street. Suite 5100 CITY. TOWN STATE ___ San Francisco _ VICINITYOF California LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC. R ecorders Qffjce-City Hall STREETS. NUMBER Market and Qth Streets CITY. TOWN STATE San Francisco California REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE None DATE —FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY. TOWN STATE DESCRIPTION w CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE JSEXCELLENT ^DETERIORATED _UNALTERED Jk)RIGINAL SITE _GOOD _RUINS _XALTERED _MOVED DATE- _FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE This little-altered, eight-story, Second Renaissance Revival structure, situated in San Francisco's financial district, served as headquarters for A.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Film Locations in San Francisco
    Film Locations in San Francisco Title Release Year Locations A Jitney Elopement 1915 20th and Folsom Streets A Jitney Elopement 1915 Golden Gate Park Greed 1924 Cliff House (1090 Point Lobos Avenue) Greed 1924 Bush and Sutter Streets Greed 1924 Hayes Street at Laguna The Jazz Singer 1927 Coffee Dan's (O'Farrell Street at Powell) Barbary Coast 1935 After the Thin Man 1936 Coit Tower San Francisco 1936 The Barbary Coast San Francisco 1936 City Hall Page 1 of 588 10/02/2021 Film Locations in San Francisco Fun Facts Production Company The Essanay Film Manufacturing Company During San Francisco's Gold Rush era, the The Essanay Film Manufacturing Company Park was part of an area designated as the "Great Sand Waste". In 1887, the Cliff House was severely Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) damaged when the schooner Parallel, abandoned and loaded with dynamite, ran aground on the rocks below. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) Warner Bros. Pictures The Samuel Goldwyn Company The Tower was funded by a gift bequeathed Metro-Goldwyn Mayer by Lillie Hitchcock Coit, a socialite who reportedly liked to chase fires. Though the tower resembles a firehose nozzle, it was not designed this way. The Barbary Coast was a red-light district Metro-Goldwyn Mayer that was largely destroyed in the 1906 earthquake. Though some of the establishments were rebuilt after the earthquake, an anti-vice campaign put the establishments out of business. The dome of SF's City Hall is almost a foot Metro-Goldwyn Mayer Page 2 of 588 10/02/2021 Film Locations in San Francisco Distributor Director Writer General Film Company Charles Chaplin Charles Chaplin General Film Company Charles Chaplin Charles Chaplin Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) Eric von Stroheim Eric von Stroheim Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) Eric von Stroheim Eric von Stroheim Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) Eric von Stroheim Eric von Stroheim Warner Bros.
    [Show full text]
  • Bright Horizons at San Francisco California Street
    Bright Horizons at San Francisco California Street At Bright Horizons at San Francisco California Street, your child will be Bright Horizons is trusted by parents around the country to care safe, well cared for, loved and for their children. We’ve implemented enhanced COVID-19 supported by our skilled teachers. Our safety protocols to ensure that all of our health and safety practices in every center are informed by guidance from the CDC carefully crafted back-up care program and state and local municipalities, and have the well-being of is there for every step, with age children, families, and staff at their core. appropriate programs to encourage curious, happy, and confident children Enhanced Operating Protocols at every age and stage. Nonessential visitors are not permitted in the center View our virtual tour! Posted health notice restricting entry Drop-offs/pick-ups are restricted to the lobby or outside the Our center has be en welcoming center families since 1996 for their back-up, Reduced class sizes – determined with reference to school vacation, and summer care applicable local guidance needs. Throughout the year, we offer Consistent groupings in separate classrooms virtual family information sessions and Outdoor time limited to one group at a time, with limited workshops, themed program weeks, back-to-back use of the play area and many other events for children from 3 months to 12 years of age. Enhanced Health and Hygiene Protocols Daily temperature and health check conducted on arrival If you would like a virtual visit prior to Social distancing is practiced as much as possible care, we would be more than happy to Bright Horizons staff wear face masks/coverings schedule one at your convenience; our Frequent cleaning and disinfecting of high-touch surfaces, center administrative team can be toys, and laundered items reached at 415-392-7531 or Enhanced COVID-19 exclusion policy restricting center [email protected].
    [Show full text]