DOCSLIB.ORG

Methods for Ecological Monitoring of Coral Reefs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Methods for Ecological Monitoring of Coral Reefs METHODS FOR ECOLOGICAL MONITORING OF CORAL REEFS JOS HILL AND CLIVE WILKINSON VERSION 1 A RESOURCE FOR MANAGERS This compendium of methods contains those known to be in common use for coral reef monitoring or were provided by coral reef resource managers and researchers from around the world. Much of the information is based on questionnaires distributed widely and from the coral reef literature. This should not be considered as a definitive list. Interested persons are invited to contact the authors for information or to indicate errors and omissions. © Australian Institute of Marine Science, 2004 Australian Institute of Marine Science PMB No 3 Townsville MC Qld 4810 Australia Telephone +61 7 4753 4444 Facsimile +61 7 4772 5852 [email protected] www.aims.gov.au Reef Check C/o Institute of the Environment 1362 Hershey Hall, Box 951496 University of California at Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA 90095-1496 USA Telephone +1-310-794-4985 Facsimile +1-310-825-0758 email: [email protected] www.reefcheck.org ISBN 0 642 322 376 Acknowledgements Special thanks go to those people who provided method descriptions and assessments from a management perspective through discussions and responses to questionnaires. We are particularly grateful to those who provided financial support for the GCRMN and this publication: the US Department of State, the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs of the UK, through the International Coral Reef Initiative, IUCN The World Conservation Union, CRC Reef Research Centre, the Total Foundation and the International Coral Reef Action Network. Scientific and technical advice was received from AIMS, AGRRA (Atlantic Gulf Rapid Reef Assessment), CARICOMP, NOAA, ReefBase, Reef Check, CORAL The Coral Reef Alliance, The Nature Conservancy and the GCRMN Management Group (UNEP, IOC-UNESCO, IUCN, the World Bank, The Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity). Personnel from IMPAC (International Marine Project Activities Centre), CRC Reef Research Centre and Alison Green provided advice and support. Tim Prior, Michael Phelan and Madeleine Nowak are thanked for their suggestions and proof reading. Finally special thanks go to the production staff at AIMS, Wendy Ellery and Tim Simmonds; again a very professional job under a tight schedule. Cover photographs were provided by Jos Hill, Dean Miller and Katerina Kupcikova. Contact Jos Hill at [email protected] ii CONTENTS Preface. .1 1: Introduction to monitoring . .2 2: What type of monitoring to use? . .4 3: General monitoring methods . 16 4: Mapping and Site Selection. 21 Manta tow . 22 Video towed diver (video manta tow) . 24 Random swim . 26 5: Benthic communities . 27 General observations . 30 Timed swims . 31 Line intercept transect . 33 Point intercept transect (PIT) . 36 Video transect . 38 Visual quadrat. 41 Permanent photo quadrat . 43 Coral health general observations . 45 Bleaching general observations. 46 Bleaching belt transect . 47 Disease belt transect . 49 Line transect (Bleaching, Disease) . 51 Tagging coral colonies . 53 Chain intercept transect . 54 Coral recruitment tiles . 56 Coral recruitment quadrats . 58 6: Macro-invertebrates . 63 Belt transect . 64 Diadema belt transect . 68 Collection of Diadema . 70 7: Fishes . 73 Towed diver (manta tow) . 76 Fish roving diver technique . 78 Fish belt transect . 79 Fish stationary plot survey . 86 Fish rapid visual census . 88 Butterfly fish method . 89 Fish spawning aggregations methods. 91 8: Monitoring physical parameters . 95 Water quality . 96 Sedimentation traps . 96 9: Monitoring programs . 98 How do you put a monitoring program together? . 98 Major programs . 98 Global Coral Reef Monitoring Program. 99 Reef Check . 100 Atlantic and Gulf Rapid Reef Assessment . 101 Caribbean Coastal Marine Productivity Program . 102 Coral Reef Degradation in the Indian Ocean . 103 Commission de l’Ocean Indien/Indian Ocean Commission . 104 Mesoamerican Barrier Reef System – Synoptic Monitoring Program . 105 Reef Condition (RECON) Monitoring Program . 106 Appendices . 107 1: How to do a pilot study? . 107 2: Generic monitoring equipment . 107 References. 112 Glossary of terms . 116 iii v Preface vi Potential methods to use for monitoring disturbance impacts. It is recommended that monitoring is done of the damage sites and control sites, preferably before the damage, during and after damaging impacts have ceased. Monitoring sites for success of recovery is a measure of the success of management intervention. Threat Impacts What to monitor (few resources) Pages Over-fishing m Fisheries - catch per unit effort – fishery dependent monitoring; 51, 64, 78, m Impacts on populations of target species: abundance & size - fishery independent monitoring 79, 86, 88 Over-exploitation of Hunting e.g. turtles & dugong m For suspected ecosystem over-fishing, monitor impacts on non-target species - cover of algae, coral, prey species etc. marine resources m Physical damage to habitat - broken coral; live and dead coral cover; Destructive fishing practices 22, 31, 33 m Impacts of over-fishing - see above. Coral mining See habitat destruction below — Habitat destruction: coastal m Area of habitat lost; 22, 27, 31, development; dredging & filling; coral m Impacts on adjacent coral communities - cover, diversity, and health. 33 mining Point source pollution: e.g. sewage, m Water quality - measure relevant pollutant e.g. sediments, nutrients, fertilisers, pesticides at source and receiving waters; 22, 31, 33, Land based impacts industry outfalls etc. m Impacts on coral communities - cover, diversity, and health. 95 m Water quality - measure relevant pollutant e.g. sediments, nutrients, fertilisers, pesticides in delivery mechanism (rivers/ Non-point source pollution: land 22, 31, 33, streams during floods) and receiving waters; clearing, agriculture, septic systems etc. 95 m Impacts on coral communities - cover, diversity, and health. m Type, quantity and distribution of pollutant; 33, 36, 51, Pollution e.g. fuel spills m Impacts on benthic communities, particularly cover of coral and algae, diversity and health of coral communities and other 64 indicator species e.g. clams, urchins. m Physical damage to habitat - area of broken/smashed coral; changes to hydrology of area e.g. new channels; Groundings/wrecks 22, 31, 51 Shipping based m Type, quantity and distribution of pollutants e.g. oil, diesel, antifouling paint & and impacts on benthic communities (see above). impacts m Diversity, size and abundance of introduced species; Introduced species in ballast water etc. 31, 64, 68 m Impacts on native species e.g. due to competition or predation; m Physical damage to habitat - area of broken/smashed coral; area of habitat lost; changes to local hydrology; and Navigation aids: lighthouses etc. 22, 31, 33 m Impact on adjacent coral communities. Coastal development: resorts, marinas, See habitat destruction above — jetties etc. m Physical damage to coral communities - broken coral; area of habitat lost; Tourism & 22, 31, 33, Offshore structures e.g. pontoons m Impacts on adjacent coral reef communities from shading - coral cover, diversity, and health; Recreation 79 m Impacts from fish feeding – fish abundance, size and diversity. Diving and snorkelling m Broken coral and coral cover at key sites. 33 m Sea surface temperatures; m Extent, severity and recovery of coral communities - cover, diversity, size structure, changes in relative abundance of growth 22, 33, 51, Coral bleaching forms; 95 m Identify bleaching resilient species and sites. Major storms, cyclones, hurricanes and m Physical damage - broken coral; and changes to coral communities - cover, diversity and relative abundance of growth forms. 22, 33 typhoons Large scale m Abundance and size of corallivores; Population outbreaks of corallivores: 22, 33, disturbances m Impacts of coral community - coral cover, diversity, and relative abundance of growth forms. COTs, Drupella etc. 51,64, 68 m Area of habitat lost or destroyed e.g. buried by lava and ash; Geologic activity: earthquakes, m Physical damage - broken coral in coral communities; 22, 27, 33, volcanoes, tsunamis m Type, quantity and distribution of pollutants e.g. lava, ash, pumice and impacts on coral reef communities - coral cover, diversity and 51 relative abundance of growth forms. PREFACE The aim of this book is to help managers of coral reefs select appropriate ecological monitoring programs, protocols and methods for your coral reef management needs. This book was written in response to requests from coral reef managers for advice on monitoring, especially: m How monitoring can help management; m How to choose the best methods to suit your needs; and m The good and bad points and associated costs of a wide range of monitoring methods. Monitoring can be specifi c or general. There are different management information needs for each coral reef area, so monitoring programs must be designed to include a selection of protocols and methods to meet those needs. The protocols and methods outlined in this book represent the ones most commonly used on coral reefs around the world. Our advice is to use the standard and frequently used methods to monitor your reefs because these have been extensively tested. Using standard methods also means that you will be able to.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Experimental Study of Nearshore Dynamics on a Barred Beach with Rip Channels Merrick C
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 107, NO. C6, 3061, 10.1029/2001JC000955, 2002 Experimental study of nearshore dynamics on a barred beach with rip channels Merrick C. Haller1 Cooperative Institute for Limnology and Ecosystems Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA Robert A. Dalrymple and Ib A. Svendsen Center for Applied Coastal Research, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA Received 4 May 2001; revised 17 October 2001; accepted 6 November 2001; published 28 June 2002. [ 1 ] Wave and current measurements are presented from a set of laboratory experiments performed on a fixed barred beach with periodically spaced rip channels using a range of incident wave conditions. The data demonstrate that the presence of gaps in otherwise longshore uniform bars dominates the nearshore circulation system for the incident wave conditions considered. For example, nonzero cross-shore flow and the presence of longshore pressure gradients, both resulting from the presence of rip channels, are not restricted to the immediate vicinity of the channels but instead are found to span almost the entire length of the longshore bars. In addition, the combination of breaker type and location is the dominant driving mechanism of the nearshore flow, and both are found to be strongly influenced by the variable bathymetry and the presence of a strong rip current. The depth-averaged currents are calculated from the measured velocities assuming conservation of mass across the measurement grid. The terms in both the cross-shore and longshore momentum balances are calculated, and their relative magnitudes are quantified. The cross-shore balance is shown to be dominated by the cross-shore pressure and radiation stress gradients in general agreement with previous results, however, the rip current is shown to influence the wave breaking and the wave-induced setup in the rip channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Inquest Finding
    Coroners Act 1996 [Section 26(1)] Western Australia RECORD OF INVESTIGATION INTO DEATH Ref No: 18/17 I, Barry Paul King, Coroner, having investigated the death of Jarrod Arthur Hampton with an inquest held at the Perth Coroner’s Court on 15 May 2017 to 18 May 2017 and on 22 May 2017 to 26 May 2017, find that the identity of the deceased person was Jarrod Arthur Hampton and that death occurred on 14 April 2012 in the waters of the Indian Ocean approximately 90 nautical miles south of Broome from drowning secondary to incapacitation from air embolism in the following circumstances: Counsel Appearing: Sergeant L Housiaux assisted the Coroner Ms G A Archer SC (instructed by Corrs Chambers Westgarth) and Mr N D Ellery appeared for Paspaley Pearling Company Pty Ltd Mr A Coote appeared for the deceased’s family Mr P Hopwood appeared for the Pearl Producers Association Ms H C Richardson (State Solicitors Office) appeared for WorkSafe Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 2 THE EVIDENCE ................................................................................................................ 4 THE DECEASED ............................................................................................................... 8 THE DECEASED’S DIVING BACKGROUND ....................................................................... 9 THE DECEASED’S SHOULDER AND PECTORALIS MAJOR .............................................. 10 THE DECEASED JOINS
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (2012)
    FGDC-STD-018-2012 Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard Marine and Coastal Spatial Data Subcommittee Federal Geographic Data Committee June, 2012 Federal Geographic Data Committee FGDC-STD-018-2012 Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard, June 2012 ______________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS PAGE 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Need ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Scope ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Application ............................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Relationship to Previous FGDC Standards .............................................................. 4 1.6 Development Procedures ......................................................................................... 5 1.7 Guiding Principles ................................................................................................... 7 1.7.1 Build a Scientifically Sound Ecological Classification .................................... 7 1.7.2 Meet the Needs of a Wide Range of Users ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ctenophore Relationships and Their Placement As the Sister Group to All Other Animals
    ARTICLES DOI: 10.1038/s41559-017-0331-3 Ctenophore relationships and their placement as the sister group to all other animals Nathan V. Whelan 1,2*, Kevin M. Kocot3, Tatiana P. Moroz4, Krishanu Mukherjee4, Peter Williams4, Gustav Paulay5, Leonid L. Moroz 4,6* and Kenneth M. Halanych 1* Ctenophora, comprising approximately 200 described species, is an important lineage for understanding metazoan evolution and is of great ecological and economic importance. Ctenophore diversity includes species with unique colloblasts used for prey capture, smooth and striated muscles, benthic and pelagic lifestyles, and locomotion with ciliated paddles or muscular propul- sion. However, the ancestral states of traits are debated and relationships among many lineages are unresolved. Here, using 27 newly sequenced ctenophore transcriptomes, publicly available data and methods to control systematic error, we establish the placement of Ctenophora as the sister group to all other animals and refine the phylogenetic relationships within ctenophores. Molecular clock analyses suggest modern ctenophore diversity originated approximately 350 million years ago ± 88 million years, conflicting with previous hypotheses, which suggest it originated approximately 65 million years ago. We recover Euplokamis dunlapae—a species with striated muscles—as the sister lineage to other sampled ctenophores. Ancestral state reconstruction shows that the most recent common ancestor of extant ctenophores was pelagic, possessed tentacles, was bio- luminescent and did not have separate sexes. Our results imply at least two transitions from a pelagic to benthic lifestyle within Ctenophora, suggesting that such transitions were more common in animal diversification than previously thought. tenophores, or comb jellies, have successfully colonized from species across most of the known phylogenetic diversity of nearly every marine environment and can be key species in Ctenophora.
    [Show full text]
  • Features of Formation of Reefs and Macrobenthos Communities in the an Thoi Archipelago the Gulf of Thailand (South China Sea)
    id7363687 pdfMachine by Broadgun Software - a great PDF writer! - a great PDF creator! - http://www.pdfmachine.com http://www.broadgun.com EEnnvviirroonnImSmSN : e0e97nn4 - 7tt45aa1 ll SSccViioleeumnne 8 Iccssuee 8 An Indian Journal Current Research Paper ESAIJ, 8(8), 2013 [297-307] Features of formation of reefs and macrobenthos communities in the An Thoi archipelago the Gulf of Thailand (South China Sea) Yuri Ya.Latypov A.V.Zhirmunsky Institute of Marine Biology, Far Eastern BranchRussian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, 690059, (RUSSIA) E-mail : [email protected] ABSTRACT KEYWORDS Macrobenthos communities studied on fringing reefs of the AnThoj Coral; archipelago using SCUBA-diving equipment. The islands are located in Reef; the turbid and highly eutrophic waters of the eastern Gulf of Thailand. We Macrobenthos; researched species composition and settlements densities and biomasses Community; in common species of algae, coelenterates, mollusks and echinoderms, as AnThoi archipelago; well as the degree of substrate coverage by macrophytes and coral. Clear Vietnam. vertical zonation identified in the change of the various communities in macrobenthos. The dominance of massive Porites on almost all reefs of the Gulf of Thailand is due to their ability to survive in stressful for many corals. They predominate over other scleractinian for the productivity of organic matter, the degree of substrate coverage and species diversity. They also constitute the reef skeleton and play a significant role of the expansion of its area in themuddy bottom of the Gulf of Thailand. 2013 Trade Science Inc. - INDIA INTRODUCTION phological zoning and developed powerful reef depos- its, common in structural reefs of the Indo- Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dietary Preferences, Depth Range and Size of the Crown of Thorns Starfish (Acanthaster Spp.) on the Coral Reefs of Koh Tao, Thailand by Leon B
    The dietary preferences, depth range and size of the Crown of Thorns Starfish (Acanthaster spp.) on the coral reefs of Koh Tao, Thailand By Leon B. Haines Author: Leon Haines 940205001 Supervisors: New Heaven Reef Conservation Program: Chad Scott Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences: Peter Hofman 29/09/2015 The dietary preferences, depth range and size of the Crown of Thorns Starfish (Acanthaster spp.) on the coral reefs of Koh Tao, Thailand Author: Leon Haines 940205001 Supervisors: New Heaven Reef Conservation Program: Chad Scott Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences: Peter Hofman 29/09/2015 Cover image:(NHRCP, 2015) 2 Preface This paper is written in light of my 3rd year project based internship of Integrated Coastal Zone management major marine biology at the Van Hall Larenstein University of applied science. My internship took place at the New Heaven Reef Conservation Program on the island of Koh Tao, Thailand. During my internship I performed a study on the corallivorous Crown of Thorns starfish, which is threatening the coral reefs of Koh Tao due to high density ‘outbreaks’. Understanding the biology of this threat is vital for developing effective conservation strategies to protect the vulnerable reefs on which the islands environment, community and economy rely. Very special thanks to Chad Scott, program director of the New Heaven Reef Conservation program, for supervising and helping me make this possible. Thanks to Devrim Zahir. Thanks to the New Heaven Reef Conservation team; Ploy, Pau, Rahul and Spencer. Thanks to my supervisor at Van Hall Larenstein; Peter Hofman. 3 Abstract Acanthaster is a specialized coral-feeder and feeds nearly solely, 90-95%, on sleractinia (reef building corals), preferably Acroporidae and Pocilloporidae families.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Fish and Macrobenthos Along the Sand Island Ocean Outfall Using Remote Video: Vi
    HANAU-S-96-002 C2 AN ANALYSIS OF THE FISH AND MACROBENTHOS ALONG THE SAND ISLAND OCEAN OUTFALL USING REMOTE VIDEO: VI. 1995 DATA Richard E. Brock PROJECT REPORT PR-96-06 March 1996 WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH CENTER UNIlVERSlTY OF HAWAI'I AT MANOA Honolulu, Hawai'i 96822 AUTHOR: Dr. Richard E. Brock AssociateResearcher and FisheriesSpecialist Sea Grant Extension Service Marine Science Building 204 University of Hawai'i at Mhtoa Honolulu, Hawai'i 96822 Tel.: 808/956-2859 FAX: 808/956-2858 $5.0O/copy Please make remittance in U.S. dollars fmm a U.S. bank or internationalmoney order to: ResearchCorporatha ot the Uaiverekyot Hawaii Mail to. Water Resources Research Center University of Hawai'i at Mmnoa 2540 Dole St., Holmes Hall 283 Honolulu, Hawai'i 96822 ~ U.S.A. Attn: Publications Of6ce NOTE: Pleaseindicate PR-9646 on checkor moneyorder for our reference. AN ANALYSIS OF THE FISH AND MACROBKNTHOS ALONG THE SAND ISLAND OCEAN OUTFALL USING REMOTE VIDEO: VI. 1995 DATA Richard E. Brock Project Report PR-9644 March 1996 PREPARED FOR Departmentof WastewaterManagement City and County of Honolulu Project Report for "The Assessmentof the Impact of OceanSewer Outfalls on the Marine Environment off Oahu, Hawaii" ProjectNo.: C39805 ProjectPeriod: 1 January1995-31 August 1996 Principal Investigator: RogerS. Fujioka WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH CENTER University of Hawai'i at Minoa Honolulu, Hawai'i 96822 Any opinions.findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in thispublication are those of the author and do not necessarilyreflect the view of the Water ResourcesResearch Center, ABSTRACT Becausethe diffuser of theSand Island Ocean Outfall lies below safe diving depths, a remotely controlled video camerasystem was used to determinethe statusof the fish and diurnallyexposed macrobenthos resident to thediffuser.
    [Show full text]
  • Birkbeck College – University Marine
    CORAL REEF MONITORING METHODS Prof Rupert Ormond Heriot-Watt University Marine Conservation International International Society for Reef Studies Introduction Surveying & monitoring – key principle Typically use transects & quadrats – but why? Must quadrats be square, must transects be straight? Experimental design & statistics Typically looking for significant differences between times or places Or for significant trends in abundance Marine methods (protocols) originally adapted from terrestrial ones often more suited site-specific scientific studies Marine conservation and management tends to need methods practicable in the marine or coastal environment cost-effective in terms of information gain per available time (especially where time available limited by use of SCUBA) usable by staff with simple gear or limited specialist qualifications Also require methods suitable for use over very large areas (of coastline or sea-bed) Problems Measuring the Amounts of Coral Colonies vary greatly in size and shape and often fragment into semi- separate colonies, so you can not simply count them Quantitative methods attempt estimate percentage cover of substrate (coral cover) by different coral species, and by other substrate types (reef rock, algae, encrusting organisms) Planar area of corals as viewed from above usually adopted as measure of abundance, but not in all methods Are several difficulties with approach: Exact measurement complex shape difficult e.g. For branching corals: how to cope with gaps between or layering of branches? Relationship between area of coral viewed from above, and actual surface area also varies greatly with growth form Methods have been tried (wrapping in foil, absorbing dye) but provides estimate only for typical specimens of particular size (diameter) Even if could estimate surface area of coral biomass of tissue per unit area varies with hugely with genus Identifying Corals Identification of less common genera difficult, & identification to species very difficult, especially nderwater May be 200-300 spp.
    [Show full text]
  • A Detailed Assessment of Snow Accumulation in Katabatic Wind Areas on the Ross Ice Shelf, Antarctica
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 102, NO. D25, PAGES 30,047-30,058, DECEMBER 27, 1997 A detailed assessment of snow accumulation in katabatic wind areas on the Ross Ice Shelf, Antarctica David A. Braaten Departmentof Physicsand Astronomy,University of Kansas,Lawrence Abstract. An investigationof time dependentsnow accumulation and erosiondynamics in a wind-sweptenvironment was undertakenat two automaticweather stations sites on the RossIce Shelf betweenJanuary 1994 andNovember 1995 usingnewly developedinstrumentation employinga techniquewhich automatically disperses inert, colored (high albedo) glass microspheresonto the snowsurface at fixed intervalsthroughout the year. The microspheresact as a time markerand tracerto allow the accumulationrate and wind erosionprocesses to be quantifiedwith a high temporalresolution. Snow core and snowpit samplingwas conducted twice duringthe studyperiod to identify microspherehorizons in the annualsnow accumulation profile, allowing the snowaccumulation/erosion events to be reconstructed.The two siteschosen for thisinvestigation have characteristically different mean wind speedsand therefore allow a comparativeexamination on the role of wind on ice sheetgrowth. Mass accumulationrate at the twosites for the 14-dayintegration periods available ranged from 0.0 to >2.0 kg m-2 d -l. The meanmass accumulation rate duringthe studyperiod was greaterat the site with strongerwinds (0.69kg m -2 d-1) than the site with lower mean wind speeds (0.61 kg m-2 d-l); however,the differencebetween the two meansis not statisticallysignificant. Accumulationrates derived from an ultrasonicsnow depth gauge operated at one of the sitesare comparedto the actualtracer-derived accumulationrates and show the limitationsof only having a measureof snow surfaceheight with no instantaneousmeasurements of the snowdensity profile. Snow depthgauge derived accumulationrates were foundto be greatlyoverestimated during high-accumulation periods and were greatlyunderestimated during low-accumulation periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Composition, Diversity and Trophic Ecology of Sediment Macrofauna at Vents, Seeps and Organic Falls
    Review Comparative Composition, Diversity and Trophic Ecology of Sediment Macrofauna at Vents, Seeps and Organic Falls Angelo F. Bernardino1*, Lisa A. Levin2, Andrew R. Thurber3, Craig R. Smith4 1 Departamento de Oceanografia e Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Espı´rito Santo, Goiabeiras, Vito´ ria, Esp´ı rito Santo, Brazil, 2 Center for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation; Integrative Oceanography Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California, United States of America,3 College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America,4 Department of Oceanography, School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America communities. Sulfide is toxic to most metazoan taxa [1,2], Abstract: Sediments associated with hydrothermal vent- although some sediment-dwelling taxa have adapted to conditions ing, methane seepage and large organic falls such as of low oxygen and appear capable of tolerating the presence of whale, wood and plant detritus create deep-sea networks sulfide. Due to high local production, metazoans in reducing of soft-sediment habitats fueled, at least in part, by the sediments in the deep sea are often released from the extreme food oxidation of reduced chemicals. Biological studies at limitation prevalent in the background community (e.g. [3]). deep-sea vents, seeps and organic falls have looked at Instead, chemical toxicity may drive infaunal community macrofaunal taxa, but there has yet to be a systematic comparison of the community-level attributes of sedi- structure. In this meta-analysis we ask which taxa are common ment macrobenthos in various reducing ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Supervised Dive
    EFFECTIVE 1 March 2009 MINIMUM COURSE CONTENT FOR Supervised Diver Certifi cation As Approved By ©2009, Recreational Scuba Training Council, Inc. (RSTC) Recreational Scuba Training Council, Inc. RSTC Coordinator P.O. Box 11083 Jacksonville, FL 32239 USA Recreational Scuba Training Council (RSTC) Minimum Course Content for Supervised Diver Certifi cation 1. Scope and Purpose This standard provides minimum course content requirements for instruction leading to super- vised diver certifi cation in recreational diving with scuba (self-contained underwater breathing appa- ratus). The intent of the standard is to prepare a non diver to the point that he can enjoy scuba diving in open water under controlled conditions—that is, under the supervision of a diving professional (instructor or certifi ed assistant – see defi nitions) and to a limited depth. These requirements do not defi ne full, autonomous certifi cation and should not be confused with Open Water Scuba Certifi cation. (See Recreational Scuba Training Council Minimum Course Content for Open Water Scuba Certifi ca- tion.) The Supervised Diver Certifi cation Standards are a subset of the Open Water Scuba Certifi cation standards. Moreover, as part of the supervised diver course content, supervised divers are informed of the limitations of the certifi cation and urged to continue their training to obtain open water diver certifi - cation. Within the scope of supervised diver training, the requirements of this standard are meant to be com- prehensive, but general in nature. That is, the standard presents all the subject areas essential for su- pervised diver certifi cation, but it does not give a detailed listing of the skills and information encom- passed by each area.
    [Show full text]
  • Drowning and Near Drowning
    Drowning and Near Drowning Drowning – Near Drowning – an asphyxiation resulting incident of potentially from submersion in fatal submersion in liquid with death liquid that did not occurring within 24 result in death or in hours of submersion which death occurred more than 24 hours after submersion Other medical conditions can be associated with near drowning − Possible trauma (caused before or during) − Hypothermia − Hypoxia Need to Know! Dry drowning – a Wet Drowning – no simulated simulated laryngospasm (airway laryngospasm occurs, obstruction) prevents resulting in the lungs large amounts of filling with water water from entering the lungs Dry vs. Wet Drowning Although the pathophysiology of fresh - water and salt water drownings differs, there is no difference in the end result or in prehospital management. Fresh vs. Salt water Drowning Mammalian diving reflex – resulting from A cold-water the submersion of the drowning face and nose in patient is water, a complex not dead cardiovascular reflex until they that constricts blood are warm flow everywhere and dead! except the brain. Factors Affecting Survival Remove patient from the water as soon as possible (this should be done by a trained rescue swimmer) Initiate ventilation while patient is still in the water. Rescue personnel should wear protective clothing in water less than 70 degrees F. In addition, attach a safety line to the rescue swimmer. In fast water, it is ESSENTIAL to use personnel trained for this type of rescue. Suspect head and neck injury if the patient experienced a fall or was diving. Rapidly place the victim on a long backboard and remove them from the water.
    [Show full text]