EXHIBIT 9:1 Request for Production, Inspection, and Copying Of
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Discovery Traps… & How to Get out of Them
DISCOVERY TRAPS… & HOW TO GET OUT OF THEM KRISTAL C. THOMSON WILSON, PENNYPACKER & THOMSON, L.L.P. 8620 N. New Braunfels, Suite 101 San Antonio, Texas 78217 State Bar of Texas 37TH ANNUAL ADVANCED FAMILY LAW COURSE August 1-4, 2011 San Antonio CHAPTER 19 Kristal Cordova Thomson WILSON, PENNYPACKER & THOMSON, L.L.P. 8620 N. New Braunfels, Suite 101 San Antonio, Texas 78217 210.826.4001 [email protected] LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS: State Bar of Texas; 2002 United States District Courts, Western District; 2003 Board Certified – Family Law, Texas Board of Legal Specialization; 2009 EDUCATION: Juris Doctorate, St. Mary’s University School of Law; 2002 Bachelor of Arts, University of Texas; 1995 CURRENT PROFESSIONAL Director, St. Mary’s Law Alumni Association ACTIVITIES: *Elected, 2005 – 2010 * Former Treasurer & Secretary Council Member Class of 2014, Family Law Council, State Bar of Texas * Elected, 2009 *Web Site Chair *Amicus Committee Treasurer, San Antonio Family Lawyers Association * Elected 2010-2011 COMMUNITY/NON-PROFIT Board of Directors, Special Olympics Texas; 2009-2011 ACTIVITIES: Appointed Committee Member, Alamo Bowl; 2005-2011 Volunteer, Junior League San Antonio; 2004-2011 Volunteer, Community Justice Program; 2003-2011 PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS: Member, Texas Academy of Family Law Specialists; since 2010 Member, San Antonio Bar Association; since 2002 * Former Board Member, 2008-2010 Member, San Antonio Young Lawyers Association; since 2002 * Former President, 2005-2006 Member, Bexar County Women’s Bar Association; since -
Case 2:05-Cv-04182-SRD-JCW Document 6050 Filed 06/27/07 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-04182-SRD-JCW Document 6050 Filed 06/27/07 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CIVIL ACTION CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION NO. 05-4182 PERTAINS TO: LEVEE, MRGO SECTION "K" (2) ORDER AND REASONS ON MOTION Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel seeking additional answers to interrogatories from defendant, the Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans ("SWB"). Record Doc. No. 5424. Specifically, the motion seeks additional answers to plaintiffs' Requests for Production Nos. 4, 6, 9, 11, 14, 15 and 16; Requests for Admissions Nos. 2, 5, 6, 15 through 22, 25 through 30, 32 through 36, 38, 44 and 49; and Interrogatories Nos. 1, 4, 7, 8, 9 and 13. Id. at ¶ 3. Defendant filed a timely opposition memorandum. Record Doc. No. 5624. At the request of defendant, Record Doc. No. 5625, oral argument was conducted on June 27, 2007. Participating were: Darlene Jacobs, Richard Martin and Lewis Lusco, representing plaintiffs, and Charles Lanier, representing defendant. Having considered the written submissions of counsel, the record and the applicable law, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: Case 2:05-cv-04182-SRD-JCW Document 6050 Filed 06/27/07 Page 2 of 11 I. REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS Plaintiffs make essentially no argument in their memorandum in support of this motion and make no specific arguments concerning any of the contested responses. Plaintiffs argue only generally that the SWB has information readily available to enable it to admit questions concerning commonality and typicality of the plaintiffs, and that an objection is not a proper answer to a Request for Admissions. -
Chapter 6: Litigation Documents
Chapter 6: Litigation Documents Chapter 6: Litigation Documents Chapter Outline: § 6.1 Legal Writing: Litigation Documents § 6.2 The Summons § 6.3 The Complaint § 6.4 Claims for Relief – Causes of Action § 6.5 The Complaint: General Allegations § 6.6 The Complaint: Establishing the Claims (Assignment) § 6.7 The Answer (Optional Assignment) § 6.8 Discovery o Assignment: Interrogatories o Assignment: Request for Admissions o Assignment: Request for Production § 6.9 Depositions o Assignment: Deposition Summary § 6.10 E-Discovery § 6.1 LEGAL WRITING: LITIGATION DOCUMENTS Litigation documents demonstrate the need for a paralegal to possess strong writing skills. These are documents created during the pre-trial, trial, and post-trial stages of the litigation process. The skills in creating these documents are transferable to many other areas of legal writing. The most common litigation documents include: Summons Interrogatories Complaints Request for Admissions Motions Request for Production of Documents Notices Request for Medical Examination Briefs (or Independent Medical Examination – IME) Subpoenas Deposition Summaries 143 Essential Skills for Paralegals: Volume II | Barber/Navallo Essential Skills for Paralegals: Volume II § 6.2 THE SUMMONS Process is the summons and complaint. Service of process, then, is the presenting of the summons and complaint to a defendant in a legal action. (Preparing a complaint is discussed on the following pages.) Technically, a summons is not a pleading. It is an instrument. However, it is usually placed in the pleading portion of a client’s file. Serving the summons and complaint fulfills one of the due process requirements of a lawsuit. Everyone has a due process right to know why and by whom he or she is being sued. -
Texas Rules of Civil Procedure
Texas Rules of Civil Procedure Table of Contents PART I - GENERAL RULES RULE 1. OBJECTIVE OF RULES RULE 2. SCOPE OF RULES RULE 3. CONSTRUCTION OF RULES RULE 3a. LOCAL RULES RULE 4. COMPUTATION OF TIME RULE 5. ENLARGEMENT OF TIME RULE 6. SUITS COMMENCED ON SUNDAY RULE 7. MAY APPEAR BY ATTORNEY RULE 8. ATTORNEY IN CHARGE RULE 9. NUMBER OF COUNSEL HEARD RULE 10. WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RULE 11. AGREEMENTS TO BE IN WRITING RULE 12. ATTORNEY TO SHOW AUTHORITY RULE 13. EFFECT OF SIGNING PLEADINGS, MOTIONS AND OTHER PAPERS; SANCTIONS RULE 14. AFFIDAVIT BY AGENT RULE 14b. RETURN OR OTHER DISPOSITION OF EXHIBITS RULE 14c. DEPOSIT IN LIEU OF SURETY BOND PART II - RULES OF PRACTICE IN DISTRICT AND COUNTY COURTS Section 1 - General Rules RULE 15. WRITS AND PROCESSES RULE 16. SHALL ENDORSE ALL PROCESS RULE 17. OFFICER TO EXECUTE PROCESS RULE 18. WHEN JUDGE DIES DURING TERMS, RESIGNS OR IS DISABLED RULE 18a. RECUSAL OR DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGES RULE 18b. GROUNDS FOR DISQUALIFICATION OR RECUSAL OF JUDGES RULE 18c. RECORDING AND BROADCASTING OF COURT PROCEEDINGS RULE 19. NON-ADJOURNMENT OF TERM RULE 20. MINUTES READ AND SIGNED RULE 21. FILING AND SERVING PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS RULE 21a. METHODS OF SERVICE RULE 21b. SANCTIONS FOR FAILURE TO SERVE OR DELIVERY A COPY OF PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS RULE 21c. PRIVACY PROTECTION FOR FILED DOCUMENTS Section 2 - Institution of Suit RULE 22. COMMENCED BY PETITION RULE 23. SUITS TO BE NUMBERED CONSECUTIVELY RULE 24. DUTY OF CLERK RULE 25. CLERK'S FILE DOCKET RULE 26. CLERK'S COURT DOCKET RULE 27. -
United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana
Case 2:05-cv-04182-SRD-JCW Document 6053 Filed 06/27/07 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CIVIL ACTION CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION NO. 05-4182 PERTAINS TO: LEVEE, MRGO SECTION "K" (2) ORDER AND REASONS ON MOTION Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel seeking additional responses to written discovery from defendant, the United States of America. Record Doc. No. 5427. Specifically, the motion seeks additional responses to plaintiffs' Requests for Production Nos. 1 through 5 and 7 through 16; Requests for Admissions Nos. 9 through 14, 15(1), 15(2),1 16 through 22, and 25 through 49; and Interrogatories Nos. 2 through 9 and 11 through 13. Defendant filed a timely opposition memorandum. Record Doc. No. 5626. Having considered the written submissions of counsel, the record and the applicable law, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART and DEFERRED IN PART, as follows. 1Plaintiffs' Request for Admissions erroneously included two requests numbered 15, which they have now re-numbered as 15(1) and 15(2). Case 2:05-cv-04182-SRD-JCW Document 6053 Filed 06/27/07 Page 2 of 22 I. REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS Plaintiffs' "motion to compel" seeks additional responses to their Request for Admissions Nos. 9 through 14, 15(1), 15(2), 16 through 22, and 25 through 49. This motion is properly viewed, not as a motion to compel, but as a motion "to determine the sufficiency of the answers or objections" to the requests. Fed. -
Of 2 SCAC MEETING AGENDA Friday, February 15, 2019 9:00 Am
SCAC MEETING AGENDA Friday, February 15, 2019 9:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Location: Texas Association of Broadcasters 502 E. 11th Street, #200 Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 322-9944 1. WELCOME (Babcock) 2. STATUS REPORT FROM CHIEF JUSTICE HECHT Chief Justice Hecht will report on Supreme Court actions and those of other courts related to the Supreme Court Advisory Committee since the September 28 and 29, 2018 meetings. 3. COMMENTS FROM JUSTICE BOYD 4. FORMS FOR AN APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF IN CYBERBULLYING CASES 735-822 Sub-Committee Members: The Hon. Stephen Yelenosky - Chair Lamont Jefferson – Vice Chair Frank Gilstrap Pete Schenkkan (a) June 11, 2018 Memo re: Cyberbullying (b) Cyberbullying Restraining Order (2-8-2019) (c) Cyberbullying Petition (2-8-2019) (d) Cyberbullying Instructions (2-8-2019) (e) Cyberbullying Statute (f) S.B. No. 179 (g) Cyberbullying Constitutional Precedents on Student Speech 5. DISCOVERY RULES 171-205 Sub-Committee Members: Mr. Robert Meadows - Chair The Hon. Tracy Christopher – Vice Chair Prof. Alexandra Albright The Hon. Jane Bland The Hon. Harvey Brown David Jackson The Hon. Ana Estevez Kent Sullivan Kimberly Phillips (h) 2019-2-11 R. Meadows Letter to C. Babcock (i) Discovery Subcommittee Proposed Amendments (2-6-2019) (j) Rule 215 Sanctions Albright Working Document (k) Revised Spoliation Rule (2-6-2019) (l) Spoliation Draft Rule (Texas) Page 1 of 2 21545057v.1 SCAC Agenda Friday, February 15, 2019 6. TEXAS RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 244 216-299a Sub-Committee Members: Prof. Elaine Carlson – Chair Thomas C. Riney – Vice Chair The Hon. David Peeples Alistair B.