Reining in the Imperial Presidency

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reining in the Imperial Presidency REINING IN THE IMPERIAL PRESIDENCY Lessons and Recommendations Relating to the Presidency of George W. Bush House Committee on the Judiciary Majority Staff Final Report to Chairman John Conyers, Jr. March 2009 Reining in the Imperial Presidency: Lessons and Recommendations Relating to the Presidency of George W. Bush Table of Contents Foreword ................................................... ................9 Executive Summary ................................................... ...... 16 Preface: Deconstructing the Imperial Presidency ................................24 I. The September 25, 2001 War Powers Memorandum . ............... 27 II. Critique of John Yoo’s Flawed Theory of Presidential Supremacy. 33 III. The Need for a Judiciary Committee Staff Report ....................... 40 Section 1 – Politicization of the Department of Justice ............................41 I. Politicization of the Prosecution Function . ...................... 43 A. Hiring and Firing of U.S. Attorneys and other Department Personnel . 43 B. Selective Prosecution ............................ ........... 50 II. Politicization of the Civil Rights Division . ........................ 55 A. Factual Background ............................... ......... 55 B. Committee Actions ................................ ........ 58 III. Findings ....................................... ................ 66 Politicization of the Prosecution Function . .............. 66 Politicization of the Civil Rights Division and Voting Rights Enforcement........................................ 72 Section 2 – Assault on Individual Liberty: Detention, Enhanced Interrogation, Ghosting and Black Sites, Extraordinary Rendition, Warrantless Domestic Surveillance, and National Security and Exigent Letters ................................................... ........... 75 I. Detention ........................................ .............. 77 A. Factual Background ............................... ......... 77 November 2001 Decision to Try Detainees, Including U.S. Citizens, in Military Commissions ............................... 78 December 2001 Decision to Hold Detainees at Guantanamo ........ 81 The Administration’s Public Defense of Its Guantanamo Policies . 82 B. The Bush Administration’s Detention Policies in the Courts ........ 85 The President’s Power to Detain an American Citizen Captured in 1 Afghanistan Without Judicial Review ( Hamdi )............. 85 The President’s Power to Establish Military Commissions to Determine Validity of Detention ( Hamdan ) ........................89 The President’s Power to Order Detention of Persons Without Access to Federal Courts – Rasul and Boumediene .................. 91 The President’s Power to Order the Military Detention of an American Citizen Seized by Civilian Authorities in the United States (Padilla )...........................................93 The President’s Power to Order Military Detention of Lawfully Admitted Alien Seized by Civilian Authorities in the United States ( al- Marri )............................................107 C. Committee Action ................................ ........ 111 II. Interrogation.................................. ................. 114 A. Factual Background ............................. .......... 114 December 2001 to February 2002 – Determinations That the Protections of the Geneva Conventions, Including Common Article III, Do Not Apply to Guantanamo Detainees . 114 The August 1, 2002 Torture Memorandum . ....... 116 August 1, 2002 – Waterboarding Approved for CIA Use .......... 118 October 2002 to March 2003 – Development of Techniques for Use at Guantanamo ....................................... 119 John Yoo’s March 14, 2003 Torture Memorandum . ....... 122 Use of Harsh Interrogation at Guantanamo . .......... 124 Migration of Guantanamo Interrogation Techniques to Abu Ghraib . 126 Role of High-level Officials ....................... .......... 127 The Congress and the President Battle over Interrogation Techniques .................................................128 Destruction of CIA Waterboarding Videotapes . .......... 132 B. Committee Action ................................. ....... 133 Effectiveness of Enhanced Interrogation . ........... 133 Potential Criminal Liability for Destruction of Videotapes ......... 135 OLC Opinions Concerning Enhanced Interrogation and Potential Legal Liability Thereto.................................. 136 III. Extraordinary Rendition, Ghosting and Black Sites .................... 143 A. Factual Background for Legal Memoranda . .......... 143 B. Committee Action ................................. ....... 147 IV. Warrantless Surveillance ....................... ................. 152 A. The Genesis of the Bush Administration’s Warrantless Surveillance Program ............................................ 152 B. Internal Disagreements as to the Program’s Legality; Disclosure of the Program by The New York Times in December 2005 ............. 154 C. Bush Administration’s Public Statements Concerning Warrantless Surveillance ....................................... ...... 160 2 D. Concerns About Legality and Effectiveness of the President’s Warrantless Surveillance ....................................... ...... 162 E. Additional Scrutiny and Legislative Activity in the 110 th Congress . 167 V. National Security Letters (NSLs) and Exigent Letters................... 172 A. The Increased use of NSLs Subsequent to 9/11 and the Enactment of the PATRIOT Act and PATRIOT Reauthorization Act . ...... 172 B. March 2007 Justice Department Inspector General Report and Subsequent Committee Hearings ...................... ....... 173 C. March 2008 Justice Department IG “Assessment of Corrective Action” Report and Subsequent Committee Hearings . ........ 177 VI. Findings ........................................ .............. 180 Detention .......................................... ..... 180 Interrogation...................................... ....... 181 Extraordinary Rendition, Ghosting and Black Sites . ............ 183 NSLs and Exigent Letters ........................... ....... 188 Section 3 – Misuse of Executive Branch Authority ............................... 191 I. Presidential Signing Statements .................. .................. 191 A. Historical Background ............................ ......... 192 B. The Bush Administration’s Use of Signing Statements............ 193 The McCain Amendment on Treatment of Detainees . ........ 194 USA PATRIOT Act .................................... 194 Affirmative Action................................. ....... 194 Whistleblower Protections .......................... ........ 195 C. Committee Actions ................................ ....... 195 II. Rulemaking Process.............................. ............... 197 A. Factual Background ............................... ........ 197 B. Executive Control by the Bush Administration . ............. 199 Executive Order 13422: Expanding White House Political Control Over Rulemaking ....................................... 199 Greater Specificity and Market Analysis Requirements ........... 200 Heightened Scrutiny of Significant Guidance Documents ......... 200 Greater Emphasis on Cost-Benefit Analysis . .......... 201 Greater Role for Political Appointees in the Rulemaking Process . 202 C. Efforts by OIRA to Control Rulemaking . ........... 202 Direct Intervention by the Administration to Control Rulemaking . 203 Using Directives and Other Means to Circumvent Formal Rulemaking .................................................204 Midnight Rulemaking ................................ ..... 205 D. Lack of Transparency............................. ......... 207 III. Findings ....................................... ............... 209 Abuse of Presidential Signing Statements . ........... 209 3 Rulemaking Process ................................. ...... 211 Section 4 – Retribution Against Critics ........................................214 I. The Leak of Valerie Plame Wilson’s Covert CIA Identity and Its Aftermath ................................................... .......... 214 A. The July 2003 Disclosure by the Press ............ ............ 214 B. The Bush Administration’s Response to the Leak . ............. 215 C. The Libby Indictment and Trial: Evidence of a White House Leak . 217 D. Mr. Libby’s Conviction, Sentence, and Presidential Grant of Clemency ................................................... 222 E. Committee Actions ................................ ....... 224 The Leak ........................................... 224 The White House’s Response to the Leak . ......... 226 The President’s Grant of Clemency . ......... 228 II. Retaliation Against Other Administration Critics ...................... 231 Military Officers – Including Former General Eric Shinseki ........ 231 Former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill and Economic Advisor Lawrence Lindsey...........................................232 Counter-terrorism Czar Richard Clarke . .......... 233 Army Core of Engineers Chief Contracting Office Bunnatine Greenhouse .................................................234 III. Findings ....................................... ............... 234 The Leak of Valerie Plame Wilson’s Covert CIA Identity ......... 234 Section 5 – Government in the Shadows: Executive Privilege, Secrecy, and the Manipulation of Intelligence ........... 239 I. Executive Privilege ............................. ................ 240 A. Formal Assertions of Executive Privilege . ............. 240 Pushing the Boundaries
Recommended publications
  • President's Message
    President’s Message his is perhaps the most exciting academic year ever on Hofstra’s campus, as we prepare to host the third and final presidential debate of the 2008 Telection season on October 15, and again present Educate ’08, our unprecedented series of lectures, conferences, exhibitions and events focused on the presidency, history, politics and social issues. For the fall Educate ’08 series, we host nationally known figures such as Robert Rubin and Paul O’Neill, George Stephanopoulos, Dee Dee Myers and Ari Fleischer, Mario Cuomo and the Council on Foreign Relations’ Richard Haass, and many other scholars, journalists and policymakers. The Center for Civic Engagement presents its sixth Day of Dialogue, with nearly 50 sessions on critical issues of the day for Democracy in Performance, a live performance featuring actors portraying historic figures. Many of our academic departments and centers, such as the Peter S. Kalikow Center for the Study of the American Presidency, the National Center for Suburban Studies, and Hofstra Entertainment, will also present events with a presidential theme. The Hofstra Cultural Center’s popular Joseph G. Astman International Concert Series features All American Music, while the Hofstra Cultural Center joins the Hofstra University Museum in presenting a reunion of the directors of Hofstra’s series of renowned presidential conferences for On the Record: A Hofstra Presidential Conference Retrospective. In addition to our exciting political series, the Hofstra Cultural Center and the academic departments continue to present a variety of lectures, concerts, dramatic performances and events that will engage and delight the entire Hofstra and surrounding communities.
    [Show full text]
  • IMPEACHMENT: WEEK FIVE What Mattered
    IMPEACHMENT: WEEK FIVE What mattered The most momentous and consequential vote of this Congress – or any Congress in recent memory – went down not with a bang, but with a quick and quiet, almost under-the-radar vote. After 12 hours of contentious and often factually disconnected debate of proposed amendments to the two articles of impeachment, the committee reconvened at 10 a.m. Friday and by 10:09 had been gaveled to a close after a party line vote to approve the articles of impeachment. The end of a heck of a week. "IMAGINATION IS THE ONLY LIMIT TO WHAT HE MAY DO NEXT" The reason we have not heard from all the witnesses and documents is because President Trump has obstructed the investigation. " – Barry Berke " Things progressed pretty much as expected last week. On Monday, the House Judiciary Committee released a 55-page report detailing the Constitutional basis for impeaching President Trump. Check out Section 6, page 41 for responses to Republicans' "inaccurate claims" about the legality or fairness of the process itself. The fireworks came when the panel questioned both the Democratic and Republican counsel. There was several hours of questioning for both the witnesses, but Barry Berke's four-minute dissection of the "excuses" for Trump's actions clearly laid out the facts. “HOW WOULD YOU BE REMEMBERED?” By Tuesday, two articles of impeachment had been prepared: Abuse of Power and Obstruction of Congress. Markup began on Wednesday with an evening session where each of the 41 committee members made their opening statements, setting the hyper-partisan tone for the next three days.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-0035-S Finding
    Presidential Materials Division 700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Room G-7 Washington, DC 20408-0001 Phone: (202) 357-5200 Fax: (202) 357-5941 [email protected] Records of the White House Photograph Office Vice Presidential Photographs taken at Camp David and the White House, September 12, 2001 Extent 455 photographs Access Collection is open to all researchers. Access to Cheney Vice Presidential records is governed by the Presidential Records Act (PRA) (44 USC 22, as amended) and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 USC 552, as amended) and therefore may be restricted in whole or in part in accordance with legal restrictions and exemptions. Copyright Records in this collection that were prepared by officials of the United States Government as part of their official duties are in the public domain. Researchers are advised to consult the copyright law of the United States (Title 17, USC) which governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Provenance Official records of the Richard Cheney vice presidency are in the custody of the Presidential Materials Division in Washington, DC and are administered by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) under the provisions of the Presidential Records Act (PRA). Processed By Staff Archivists, October 2015. Previously restricted materials are added as they are released. Scope and Content This body of records consists of photographs of Vice President Cheney abroad Marine Two and his activities at Camp David and the White House the day after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center in New York City.
    [Show full text]
  • President Biden Appeals for Unity He Faces a Confluence of Crises Stemming from Pandemic, Insurrection & Race by BRIAN A
    V26, N21 Thursday, Jan.21, 2021 President Biden appeals for unity He faces a confluence of crises stemming from pandemic, insurrection & race By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – In what remains a crime scene from the insurrection on Jan. 6, President Joe Biden took the oath of office at the U.S. Capitol Wednesday, appealing to all Americans for “unity” and the survival of the planet’s oldest democ- racy. “We’ve learned again that democracy is precious,” when he declared in strongman fashion, “I alone can fix Biden said shortly before noon Wednesday after taking the it.” oath of office from Chief Justice John Roberts. “Democ- When Trump fitfully turned the reins over to Biden racy is fragile. And at this hour, my friends, democracy has without ever acknowledging the latter’s victory, it came prevailed.” after the Capitol insurrection on Jan. 6 that Senate Minor- His words of assurance came four years to the day ity Leader Mitch McConnell said he had “provoked,” leading since President Trump delivered his dystopian “American to an unprecedented second impeachment. It came with carnage” address, coming on the heels of his Republican National Convention speech in Cleveland in July 2016 Continued on page 3 Biden’s critical challenge By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – Here is the most critical chal- lenge facing President Biden: Vaccinate as many of the 320 million Americans as soon as possible. While the Trump administration’s Operation Warp “Hoosiers have risen to meet Speed helped develop the CO- VID-19 vaccine in record time, these unprecedented challenges. most of the manufactured doses haven’t been injected into the The state of our state is resilient arms of Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitics, Oil Law Reform, and Commodity Market Expectations
    OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW VOLUME 63 WINTER 2011 NUMBER 2 GEOPOLITICS, OIL LAW REFORM, AND COMMODITY MARKET EXPECTATIONS ROBERT BEJESKY * Table of Contents I. Introduction .................................... ........... 193 II. Geopolitics and Market Equilibrium . .............. 197 III. Historical U.S. Foreign Policy in the Middle East ................ 202 IV. Enter OPEC ..................................... ......... 210 V. Oil Industry Reform Planning for Iraq . ............... 215 VI. Occupation Announcements and Economics . ........... 228 VII. Iraq’s 2007 Oil and Gas Bill . .............. 237 VIII. Oil Price Surges . ............ 249 IX. Strategic Interests in Afghanistan . ................ 265 X. Conclusion ...................................... ......... 273 I. Introduction The 1973 oil supply shock elevated OPEC to world attention and ensconced it in the general consciousness as a confederacy that is potentially * M.A. Political Science (Michigan), M.A. Applied Economics (Michigan), LL.M. International Law (Georgetown). The author has taught international law courses for Cooley Law School and the Department of Political Science at the University of Michigan, American Government and Constitutional Law courses for Alma College, and business law courses at Central Michigan University and the University of Miami. 193 194 OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 63:193 antithetical to global energy needs. From 1986 until mid-1999, prices generally fluctuated within a $10 to $20 per barrel band, but alarms sounded when market prices started hovering above $30. 1 In July 2001, Senator Arlen Specter addressed the Senate regarding the need to confront OPEC and urged President Bush to file an International Court of Justice case against the organization, on the basis that perceived antitrust violations were a breach of “general principles of law.” 2 Prices dipped initially, but began a precipitous rise in mid-March 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Affairs Programming at a Glance 2016
    Congressional Affairs Programming At A Glance 2016 - 2020 Congressional Delegations Congress-Bundestag Forum 2020 February 15-20, 2020 Elmau and Munich, Germany The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) and the Robert Bosch Stiftung Foundation (Bosch) hosted the 17th Annual Congress-Bundestag Forum. A bipartisan delegation of members of the U.S. House of Representatives met with members of the German Bundestag for a series of discussions on areas of mutual concern, such as: Asia in the transatlantic space, challenges to the West, European reunification after the end of communism, social cohesion, energy issues, and workforce development. Participants of the Congress-Bundestag Forum 2020 included Representatives Rob Bishop (R-UT), Bill Flores (R-TX), Mark Green (R-TN), Robin Kelly (D-IL), Brenda Lawrence (D-MI), Barbara Lee (D-CA), Debra Lesko (R-AZ), C. A. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-MD), Eric Swalwell (D- CA), Mike Turner (R-OH), as well as fifteen members of the German Bundestag. Transatlantic Technology Congressional Delegation 2019 November 3-8, 2019 Berlin, Germany and Brussels, Belgium GMF held, with Software.org, The Transatlantic Technology Congressional Delegation (TTCD), held in Brussels, Belgium and Berlin, Germany, enabled members of Congress to engage directly with stakeholders on topics relating to the transatlantic digital space. TTCD 2019 covered issues such as data protection, data ownership, cybersecurity, workforce development, digital trade, and digital entrepreneurship, among other issues. Participants of TTCD 2019 included Representatives Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE), Charlie Crist (D-FL), Glen Grothman (R-WI), James Sensenbrenner (R-WI), Greg Walden (D-OR), and four senior congressional staffers.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 153 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2007 No. 47 Senate The Senate met at 2 p.m. and was appoint the Honorable MARK L. PRYOR, a After all, this was a President who called to order by the Honorable MARK Senator from the State of Arkansas, to per- won two elections by the barest of mar- L. PRYOR, a Senator from the State of form the duties of the Chair. gins, first by the Supreme Court. Yet Arkansas. ROBERT C. BYRD, after 9/11, instead of uniting the coun- President pro tempore. try, he has chosen to push the envelope PRAYER Mr. PRYOR thereupon assumed the of his authority. On everything from The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- chair as Acting President pro tempore. the runup to the war in Iraq, to the fered the following prayer: f plan to destroy Social Security, to the Let us pray: RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY use of warrantless wiretapping, this ad- Lord, You have promised to work for LEADER ministration has governed without the good of those who love You. Work compromise. in the lives of our lawmakers, The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- The political purge of U.S. attorneys strengthening them for every problem, pore. The majority leader is recog- is only the latest example of this Presi- trial, and temptation they face. Open nized. dent’s unhealthy disregard for checks their eyes to see Your hand at work f and balances.
    [Show full text]
  • Intentional Disregard: Trump's Authoritarianism During the COVID
    INTENTIONAL DISREGARD Trump’s Authoritarianism During the COVID-19 Pandemic August 2020 This report is dedicated to those who have suffered and lost their lives to the COVID-19 virus and to their loved ones. Acknowledgments This report was co-authored by Sylvia Albert, Keshia Morris Desir, Yosef Getachew, Liz Iacobucci, Beth Rotman, Paul S. Ryan and Becky Timmons. The authors thank the 1.5 million Common Cause supporters whose small-dollar donations fund more than 70% of our annual budget for our nonpartisan work strengthening the people’s voice in our democracy. Thank you to the Common Cause National Governing Board for its leadership and support. We also thank Karen Hobert Flynn for guidance and editing, Aaron Scherb for assistance with content, Melissa Brown Levine for copy editing, Kerstin Vogdes Diehn for design, and Scott Blaine Swenson for editing and strategic communications support. This report is complete as of August 5, 2020. ©2020 Common Cause. Printed in-house. CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................ 3 President Trump’s ad-lib pandemic response has undermined government institutions and failed to provide states with critically needed medical supplies. .............5 Divider in Chief: Trump’s Politicization of the Pandemic .................................... 9 Trump has amplified special interest-funded “liberate” protests and other “reopen” efforts, directly contradicting public health guidance. ...................9 Trump and his enablers in the Senate have failed to appropriate adequate funds to safely run this year’s elections. .........................................11 President Trump has attacked voting by mail—the safest, most secure way to cast ballots during the pandemic—for purely personal, partisan advantage. ..............12 The Trump administration has failed to safeguard the health of detained and incarcerated individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • The SEC and the Failure of Federal, Takeover Regulation
    Florida State University Law Review Volume 34 Issue 2 Article 2 2007 The SEC and the Failure of Federal, Takeover Regulation Steven M. Davidoff [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Steven M. Davidoff, The SEC and the Failure of Federal, Takeover Regulation, 34 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. (2007) . https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol34/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW THE SEC AND THE FAILURE OF FEDERAL TAKEOVER REGULATION Steven M. Davidoff VOLUME 34 WINTER 2007 NUMBER 2 Recommended citation: Steven M. Davidoff, The SEC and the Failure of Federal Takeover Regulation, 34 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. 211 (2007). THE SEC AND THE FAILURE OF FEDERAL TAKEOVER REGULATION STEVEN M. DAVIDOFF* I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 211 II. THE GOLDEN AGE OF FEDERAL TAKEOVER REGULATION.................................. 215 A. The Williams Act (the 1960s) ..................................................................... 215 B. Going-Privates (the 1970s)......................................................................... 219 C. Hostile Takeovers (the 1980s)..................................................................... 224 1. SEC Legislative
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligence Legalism and the National Security Agency's Civil Liberties
    112 Harvard National Security Journal / Vol. 6 ARTICLE Intelligence Legalism and the National Security Agency’s Civil Liberties Gap __________________________ Margo Schlanger* * Henry M. Butzel Professor of Law, University of Michigan. I have greatly benefited from conversations with John DeLong, Mort Halperin, Alex Joel, David Kris, Marty Lederman, Nancy Libin, Rick Perlstein, Becky Richards, and several officials who prefer not to be named, all of whom generously spent time with me, discussing the issues in this article, and many of whom also helped again after reading the piece in draft. I would also like to extend thanks to Sam Bagenstos, Rick Lempert, Daphna Renan, Alex Rossmiller, Adrian Vermeule, Steve Vladeck, Marcy Wheeler, Shirin Sinnar and other participants in the 7th Annual National Security Law Workshop, participants at the University of Iowa law faculty workshop, and my colleagues at the University of Michigan Legal Theory Workshop and governance group lunch, who offered me extremely helpful feedback. Jennifer Gitter and Lauren Dayton provided able research assistance. All errors are, of course, my responsibility. Copyright © 2015 by the Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College and Margo Schlanger. 2015 / Intelligence Legalism and the NSA’s Civil Liberties Gaps 113 Abstract Since June 2013, we have seen unprecedented security breaches and disclosures relating to American electronic surveillance. The nearly daily drip, and occasional gush, of once-secret policy and operational information makes it possible to analyze and understand National Security Agency activities, including the organizations and processes inside and outside the NSA that are supposed to safeguard American’s civil liberties as the agency goes about its intelligence gathering business.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of the Imperial Presidency and the Framework for Executive Power, 1933-1960
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Dissertations Graduate College 4-2013 Building A House of Peace: The Origins of the Imperial Presidency and the Framework for Executive Power, 1933-1960 Katherine Elizabeth Ellison Western Michigan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations Part of the Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Ellison, Katherine Elizabeth, "Building A House of Peace: The Origins of the Imperial Presidency and the Framework for Executive Power, 1933-1960" (2013). Dissertations. 138. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/138 This Dissertation-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BUILDING A HOUSE OF PEACE: THE ORIGINS OF THE IMPERIAL PRESIDENCY AND THE FRAMEWORK FOR EXECUTIVE POWER, 1933-1960 by Katherine Elizabeth Ellison A dissertation submitted to the Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History Western Michigan University April 2013 Doctoral Committee: Edwin A. Martini, Ph.D., Chair Sally E. Hadden, Ph.D. Mark S. Hurwitz, Ph.D. Kathleen G. Donohue, Ph.D. BUILDING A HOUSE OF PEACE: THE ORIGINS OF THE IMPERIAL PRESIDENCY AND THE FRAMEWORK FOR EXECUTIVE POWER, 1933-1960 Katherine Elizabeth Ellison, Ph.D. Western Michigan University, 2013 This project offers a fundamental rethinking of the origins of the imperial presidency, taking an interdisciplinary approach as perceived through the interactions of the executive, legislative, and judiciary branches of government during the 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the Federal Securities Laws
    Florida International University College of Law eCollections Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 2003 Accountants Make Miserable Policemen: Rethinking the Federal Securities Laws Jerry W. Markham Florida International University College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ecollections.law.fiu.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Banking and Finance Law Commons Recommended Citation Jerry W. Markham, Accountants Make Miserable Policemen: Rethinking the Federal Securities Laws, 28 N.C.J. Int'l L. & Com. Reg. 725, 812 (2003). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at eCollections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of eCollections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +(,121/,1( Citation: Jerry W. Markham, Accountants Make Miserable Policemen: Rethinking the Federal Securities Laws, 28 N.C.J. Int'l L. & Com. Reg. 725 (2003) Provided by: FIU College of Law Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline Tue May 1 11:26:02 2018 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at https://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: Copyright Information Use QR Code reader to send PDF to your smartphone or tablet device Accountants Make Miserable Policemen: Rethinking the Federal
    [Show full text]