DOCSLIB.ORG

Conceptualisation and Pilot Study of Shelled Compressed Earth Block for Sustainable Housing in Nigeria

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conceptualisation and Pilot Study of Shelled Compressed Earth Block for Sustainable Housing in Nigeria International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment (2014) 3, 72–86 HOSTED BY Gulf Organisation for Research and Development International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment ScienceDirect www.sciencedirect.com Original Article/Research Conceptualisation and pilot study of shelled compressed earth block for sustainable housing in Nigeria C. Egenti ⇑, J.M. Khatib 1, D. Oloke 2 Faculty of Science and Engineering, Dept. of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, United Kingdom Received 25 December 2013; accepted 20 May 2014 Abstract Meeting the housing needs in Nigeria is a long-standing task, yet to be realised. The economy of the country, as most developing coun- tries, is ailing with limited resources. Energy and infrastructures are inadequate, yet the use of cement dominated the construction industry. Earth construction is a sustainable option to housing with inherent characteristics that should be desirable in the ailing economy of hot trop- ical environment in Africa. However, most Nigerians are skeptical of taking a low cost option with less modern effects and uncertain dura- bility. This research explores the issues relating to this problem and aims to bridge the gap between Nigerians and earth, which exists in abundance in Africa. The emerging concept from the survey of public reaction to earth construction in Nigeria is of a shelled compressed earth block (SCEB) of an inner core of ‘earth’ with less stabilisation and an outer shell of the same earth composition but with higher ratio of cement stabilisation for adequate durability, compressed into a single piece. A mechanical kit was designed and fabricated for the produc- tion of sample shelled compressed earth block for laboratory tests. Basic preliminary tests were conducted on the model and results revealed that the concept was feasible thus paved the way for further research work in shelled compressed earth block (SCEB). Ó 2014 The Gulf Organisation for Research and Development. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license. Keywords: Sustainability; Social consciousness; Shelled compressed earth block; Durability; Surface texture 1. Introduction In Nigeria, the relics of earth buildings are seen in our tra- ditional city centres as reminiscence of history. These old Buildings of earth date back to 12,000 BC (Pacheco- earth buildings, associated with the Natives, are gradually Torgal and Jalali, 2012). It was a phase in the historic disappearing as illustrious sons and daughters of these fam- development of human shelter. The basic house walls in ilies are replacing them with modern structures. Where most traditional architecture in Nigeria were built of ‘earth’ there were no means of replacing them, Natives have in simple low-cost and self-help construction arrangement. traded them for good fortune to Commercial Banks and Companies who desired their strategic locations. Modern research has established that earth construction ⇑ Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 7405549455, +234 8034655073. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (C. Egenti), [email protected]. is sustainable with less drain on infrastructure (Minke, uk (J.M. Khatib), [email protected] (D. Oloke). 2000; Keefe, 2005; Real, 2010). The earth technology has 1 Tel.: +44 01902518588. advanced with a modern face of stabilised compressed 2 Tel.: +44 7789264899. earth blocks (CEBs) and rammed earth (RE) walls. The Peer review under responsibility of The Gulf Organisation for Research analysis made by Guillaud et al. (1985) revealed that a and Development. compressed earth brick wall cost 32 per cent less than http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.05.002 2212-6090/Ó 2014 The Gulf Organisation for Research and Development. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license. C. Egenti et al. / International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment 3 (2014) 72–86 73 sand–cement blocks. The analysis of Taylor and Luther these concerns. Common defects like in Fig. 1 are notice- (2004) showed that the large thermal capacity of earth able in even professionally executed earth walls. walls improves their thermal properties above that The most commonly used protection techniques were expected by consideration of R-values alone. Morton identified by various works in earth construction technol- (2010) revealed a sound reduction index of 46 db to ogy (Rigassi, 1985; Guillaud et al., 1985; Minke, 2000). 57 db; and that a 16 inch compressed earth brick wall has They are roof overhangs, cement, lime or bitumen stabilisa- a coefficient of acoustic attenuation (tested at 500 Hz) of tion, damp proof courses, surface coatings and rendering. 40 to 50 db. Earth improves indoor air quality and lowers Heath et al. (2012) suggested ‘appropriate detailing’ as a embodied energy (Minke, 2000). These characteristics of requirement for Modern Earth Construction. earth are highly desirable in the ailing economy of hot trop- ical environment. However, new houses built of earth are 2.1.1. Durability rare in urban environment in Nigeria, compared to the Durability in modern context should not be assessed by baked bricks in the United Kingdom and France. how long an earth wall stands without falling but also Sandcrete block-walls presently dominate the building con- how well the integrity of the original texture of exposed sur- struction industry in Nigeria with the attendant demerits of faces lasts with no deterioration. This probably explains the high cement utilisation, poor thermal performance and reason for a cold shoulder from Nigerians who under high cost. unpleasant financial strains strived to build with, the This research aims to enhance the compressed earth expensive, sand–cement blocks, which are widely known block by evolving a model that gives extra consideration for durability, reliability and pleasant aesthetic effect. to durability and surface texture within the framework of affordable housing and social consciousness of average 2.1.2. Planning Nigerians. A review and survey of housing in Nigeria were The planning of an adequate roof overhang to protect carried out. These were intended to practically identify rea- earth wall in Africa is very challenging. The cost of roof sons for non-acceptability and evolve possible solutions overhang in the contest of modernity can be enormous that may reverse the present trend of non-utilisation of (Egenti et al., 2013b). The microclimate of heavy driving earth. The contesting issue of durability against cost was rainfall in most parts of the continent and the low level analysed in a comparative assessment of cement content of infrastructural development like irregular supply of elec- needed for stabilisation. The emerging model is Shelled tricity make such planning difficult. The Architect goes compressed earth block (SCEB) for which a mechanical through the arduous task of balancing between creating kit was designed and fabricated to produce samples for lab- internal spaces of adequate natural lighting and ventilation oratory tests. Preliminary laboratory tests were conducted while avoiding an exposure of the external walls. The plan- on samples of SCEB specimens with feasible results. ning becomes almost impossible with storey buildings, which are most desirable in Africa for the factor of secu- rity, increased ventilation and social class factor. 2. Background/context for the study 2.1.3. Quality control Earth is an unstandardised building material with limi- This is applicable to material, methods and earth block tations which Minke (2000) identified as surface erosion presses. It is apparent that the state of quality control, for when exposed to weather and a need for frequent mainte- earth construction, hangs in critical balance with very lim- nance. Attempts have been made at solution to the limita- ited tolerance for satisfactory performance. It is worthy of tions of earth (Ngowi, 1997; Ikejiofor, 1998; Wekesa et al., note that the sand–cement wall system also has the quality 2010; Galan-Marin et al., 2010) with improved results. control element, but has been very successful in terms of However, overcoming the limitations of earth remained a durability in tropical environment because of a wider toler- subject of interest in modern research. ance for satisfactory performance. In other words, a small compromise in material and method may not result in very 2.1. Challenges of earth construction significant defect. This explains the reason why sand– cement wall has been very successful in the hands of all UNCHS Habitat (1986) observed from field experiences manners of artisans and funding statues of developers. It that majority of world’s earth houses in rural areas, all suf- is therefore important to advance earth construction fer from common defects identified as: Surface erosion, technology to a state of increased tolerance for satisfactory partial crumbling, unhealthy conditions due to constant performance where an architectural design with some humidity, and hallowed bases. Heathcote (1995) identified exposed walls or a small reduction in the effectiveness of durability of earth wall as one area that attracts the most a press may not result in very significant defects. Quality concern from the public and emphasised the importance control factor has been identified by field reports as reason of addressing this problem for earth to gain acceptance for defects in earth buildings (UN-HABITAT, 2012). as a modern building material. He concluded that there is These are probably the challenges militating against a no conclusive evidence based on field performance to alley wide acceptability of earth construction in urban environ- 74 C. Egenti et al. / International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment 3 (2014) 72–86 Figure 1. Common defects or imperfections in earth walls (Source: Walker et al., 2005). ment in Nigeria. This research aims to evolve a model that proof/washable surfaces for floors and walls. This was may increase the tolerance for satisfactory performance of apparently a progressive and positive development in compressed earth block. human shelter and living conditions – product of science and technological development.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unearthingbuilding
    BUILDING UNEARTHING POTENTIAL A DESIGN PRIMER FOR RAMMED EARTH AND CEBS Christopher Maurer UNEARTHING BUILDING POTENTIAL A DESIGN PRIMER FOR RAMMED EARTH AND CEBS For the Center for Architecture Foundation This manual was written as part of the 2014 Arnold W. Brunner Award Special Thanks to the Smart Shelter Foundation, Tania Afroz, Chris Rollins, Rueben Brambleby, MASS Deisgn Group, and Iwan Baan 2015 redhouse studio, 1455 W 29th St. Cleveland, OH 44113, www.redhousearchitecture.org re dhouse studio UNEARTHING BUILDING POTENTIAL Part 1 Introduc on 1.1 A Case for Using Earth 1.2 A Brief History of Earth Construc on 1.3 Overview of Methods Part 2 Soil 2.1 Soils 2.2 Tes ng Soils Part 3 Construc on Techniques 3.1 Rammed Earth 3.2 Compressed Earth Block 3.3 Tes ng the Units Part 4 Design 4.1 Design Principals 4.2 Founda ons, Walls, and Openings 4.3 Ringbeams, lintels, roofs 4.4 Lateral Stability Part 5 Case Study 5.1 Butaro Doctors’ Housing - MASS Design Group Part 6 Open Resources 6.1 Cinva Ram Block Press 6.2 Machine Press 6.3 Formwork schema cs 6.4 Tes ng Equipment This manual is a design primer for architects, designers, construc on workers, and students interested in working with earth construc on, specifi cally Rammed Earth and Compressed Earth Block, and for those that would like to expand their general knowledge of these construc on methods. The informa on here is provided so that the reader may learn more about the methods and materials involved in earth construc on but should not serve as a subs tute for using a qualifi ed engineer, architect, or builder when building a structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Modeling of Rammed Earth Constructions: Analysis and Recommendations R
    First International Conference on Bio-based Building Materials June 22nd - 24th 2015 Clermont-Ferrand, France NUMERICAL MODELING OF RAMMED EARTH CONSTRUCTIONS: ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS R. El Nabouch, Q.-B. Bui ,*, P. Perrotin, O. Plé, J.-P. Plassiard Université de Savoie, LOCIE – CNRS UMR 5271, 73376 Le Bourget du Lac, France. *Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Rammed earth (RE) material presents actually attracting interests in the context of sustainable development. In addition to low embodied energy, rammed earth constructions present interesting living comfort thanks to the substantial thermal inertia and the natural “moisture regulator” of the RE walls. This is why several researches have been recently carried out to study this material. However, comparing to other conventional materials (e.g. concrete), there is not yet sufficient results in the literature which enable to perform advanced studies in the case of extreme loadings (e.g. earthquake). The paper presents firstly a review of the existing studies on RE, from the material characteristics to the structural behavior, from the experimental results to the numerical models. An analysis of these results is presented. Secondly, numerical simulations using a finite element code (ASTER) are engaged. The Drucker-Prager elasto-plastic model is adopted. Experimental results, coming from the literature, are used to calibrate the numerical simulation. The variability of the parameters (Young modulus, friction angle, cohesion …) and the relevance of the used model will be discussed. Finally, recommendations for future numerical and experimental studies will be presented. Keywords: Rammed earth; mechanical characteristics; numerical modeling; Drucker-Prager model. material. The main objective of this article is to provide an accurate knowledge about the behavior and the 1 INTRODUCTION mechanical characteristics of this material in building Buildings constructed by local materials are construction.The first part of this article will mainly sustainable in the actual context.
    [Show full text]
  • Rammed Earth Structures – Code of Practice Thc 03
    SADCSTAN TC 1/SC 5/CD SAZS 724 SADC HARMONIZED STANDARD FOR RAMMED EARTH STRUCTURES – CODE OF PRACTICE THC 03 SADCSTAN TC 1/SC 5/CD SAZS 724 LOCAL FOREWORD This Standard SADC ZW HS 983:2014: Rammed earth structures – Code of practice, is the national adoption of Southern African Development Community Cooperation in Standardization’s (SADCSTAN) regional standard. This standard replaces ZWS 724:2000 which is now withdrawn. The SADCSTAN membership is open to National Standards Bodies (NSBs) of SADC Member States, or where a NSB has not been established by a Member State, any other institution designated by its Minister responsible for industry and trade. The Standards Association of Zimbabwe being the national standards body is a member of SADCSTAN. SADCSTAN promotes the coordination of standardization activities and services in the region with the purpose of achieving harmonization of standards and technical regulations (with the exception of legal metrology regulations) in support of the objectives of the SADC Protocol on trade. Zimbabwe’s participation in the development of this regional standard was through the Standards Association of Zimbabwe’s Technical Committee (TC) BC 042: Rammed Earth Structures, on which the following interests were represented: University of Zimbabwe, Department of Civil Engineering Civic Forum (Housing People of Zimbabwe) Construction Industry Federation of Zimbabwe Institute of Architects of Zimbabwe Intermediate Technology Development Group John Sisk and Son Julian Keable and Partners Ministry of National Housing and Social Amenities Ministry of Transport Infrastructural Development Scientific and Industrial Research and Development Centre Standards Association of Zimbabwe Zimbabwe Association of Consulting Engineers Rammed Earth Consulting CIC i SADCSTAN TC 1/SC 5/CD SAZS 724 Contents Page RAMMED EARTH STRUCTURES — CODE OF PRACTICE ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Assessing the Perception of Compressed
    THESIS ASSESSING THE PERCEPTION OF COMPRESSED EARTH BLOCK (CEB) AMONG CONTRACTORS IN THE PIEDMONT REGION OF NORTH CAROLINA Submitted by Evan G. Hughes Department of Construction Management In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Summer 2015 Masters Committee Advisor: Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez Jerry Vaske Jonathan Elliott Copyright by Evan G. Hughes 2015 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT ASSESSING THE PERCEPTION OF COMPRESSED EARTH BLOCK (CEB) AMONG CONTRACTORS IN THE PIEDMONT REGION OF NORTH CAROLINA The earliest earthen dwellings in the U.S were made by manually pressing a mixture of moist earth and straw into roughhewn blocks. This method, known as adobe, is durable and environmentally benign but requires more time and manual labor than most conventional materials, and as a result has been largely ignored by U.S. contractors with the exception of those working in New Mexico. This is true of most earthen building techniques, including compressed earth block (CEB). CEB retains many of the environmental benefits of adobe and can be produced with automated machinery, allowing for rapid and consistent block production in large volumes. With the advent of labor and time-saving technology, the practical barriers presented by traditional earth building methods have been greatly reduced, necessitating an exploration of the non-technical barriers to CEB acceptance and adoption in the U.S. Studies conducted in Africa and Southeast Asia have shown that home-buyers often associate earthen structures with poverty, transience, and poor performance. Research performed in Midwestern states have indicated similar results. The current study seeks to determine what, if any, perception barriers to CEB acceptance and adoption exist among contractors in the North Carolina Piedmont region, which lies between the Appalachian Mountains and the Atlantic coastal plain and possesses ideal soil for earth building.
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness of the Repair of Unstabilised Rammed Earth with Injection of Mud Grouts
    Effectiveness of the repair of unstabilised rammed earth with injection of mud grouts R.A. Silva 1, D.V. Oliveira 2, L. Schueremans 3, T. Miranda 4, J. Machado 5 1-2, 4-5 ISISE, University of Minho, Guimarães, Portugal 3 Department of Civil Engineering, KU Leuven / Frisomat, Belgium Abstract: The presence of cracks debilitates the structural performance of rammed earth. Grout injection is a repair solution put forward recently, where compatibility issues demand using mud grouts. Little is known on this topic, whereby an experimental program on the mechanical effectiveness of grout injection for repairing cracks in rammed earth was performed. Specimens tested under bending and diagonal compression were retested after repair with injection of mud grouts. Mud grouts incorporating the original soil of the rammed earth are shown to perform better and their injection achieves satisfactory shear strength recovery, but is less effective in recovering initial shear stiffness. Keywords: Earth construction, rammed earth, repair, injection, mud grout, diagonal compression, shear strength, three-point bending, bending strength, experimental program Highlights: - The repair effectiveness of mud grouts is tested; - The shear behaviour of rammed earth depends on binding, friction and interlocking; - Mud grouts incorporating the same soil of the rammed earth perform better; - Grout injection provides satisfactory strength recovery; - Grout injection is incapable of recovering the initial shear stiffness. 1PhD, Post-doc researcher, ISISE, University of Minho, Department of Civil Engineering, Azurém, P-4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal. Phone: +351 253 510 200, fax: +351 253 510 217, email: [email protected] 2PhD, Professor, ISISE, University of Minho, Department of Civil Engineering, Azurém, P-4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Cost Analysis Between Interlocking Bricks and Sandcrete Blocks for Residential Buildings in Ghana
    MOJ Civil Engineering Research Article Open Access Comparative cost analysis between interlocking bricks and sandcrete blocks for residential buildings in Ghana Abstract Volume 4 Issue 4 - 2018 The extensive use of Sandcrete blocks (SBs) for residential buildings as compared to Emmanuel Nana Jackson, Zakari Mustapha, interlocking bricks (IBs) has significantly increased its cost and has therefore affected the cost of housing delivery in Ghana. The research aimed at comparing the cost of Addobea Joyce Aburam, Jeriscot Henry SBs and IBs for residential buildings in Ghana. The study adopted qualitative and Quayson physical measurement methods of data collection on a two bedroom self–contain floor Department of Building Technology, School of Engineering, Cape Coast Technical University, Ghana plan building. The findings revealed that lesser construction time was required for IBs. It was also established from the study that a total cost of GH¢14,268.54 and Correspondence: Zakari Mustapha, Department of Building GH¢ 18,869.64 were observed for IBs and SBs respectively. The difference in cost Technology, School of Engineering, Cape Coast Technical of SBs were found to be GH¢4,601.10, representing 24.38%. The consequence is University, Cape Coast, Ghana, P. O. Box AD.50, Cape Coast, reduction in laborer force, limited finishing time and minimum running cost, without Ghana, Tel 2335 0416 6674, compromising the aesthetic and strength value. The study therefore recommends the Email [email protected] use of IBs for prospective building developers, entrepreneurs and individuals due to its cost saving, time and running cost. Received: November 08, 2017 | Published: July 19, 2018 Keywords: affordable housing, environmental friendliness, design flexibility, housing policy, housing problems, population, shelter Introduction percentage cost difference in putting up a building using sandcrete blocks and interlocking bricks are known.
    [Show full text]
  • Flexural Behavior of Interlocking Compressed Earth Block Shear Walls Subjected to In-Plane Loading
    FLEXURAL BEHAVIOR OF INTERLOCKING COMPRESSED EARTH BLOCK SHEAR WALLS SUBJECTED TO IN-PLANE LOADING A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering by Bradley James Stirling July 2011 © 2011 BRADLEY JAMES STIRLING ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP TITLE: Flexural Behavior of Interlocking Compressed Earth Block Shear Walls Subjected to In-plane Loading AUTHOR: Bradley James Stirling DATE SUBMITTED: July 2011 COMMITTEE CHAIR: Bing Qu, Assistant Professor COMMITTEE MEMBER: Daniel Jansen, Associate Professor COMMITTEE MEMBER: Peter Laursen, Assistant Professor iii ABSTRACT Flexural Behavior of Interlocking Compressed Earth Block Shear Walls Subjected to In-Plane Loading Bradley James Stirling This thesis investigates the flexural behavior of interlocking compressed earth block (ICEB) shear walls. In-plane cyclic tests were conducted to evaluate the performance of three flexure dominant large scale ICEB specimens: a slim wall with a 2:1 height to width aspect ratio, a flanged wall, and a wall with an opening at the center. Following the experimental investigation, two types of analyses were conducted for calculating the ultimate strength of flexure dominant ICEB walls: a nonlinear static analysis model assuming lumped plasticity and a plastic analysis model. In addition, incremental dynamic analysis was conducted to address the seismic performance of flexure dominant ICEB buildings. Based on the database from the incremental dynamic analysis, the collapse potential of demonstration ICEB buildings were compared for the countries of interest. Keywords: interlocking compressed earth block, flexural behavior, cyclic testing; nonlinear analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • D a N I E L J O H N B U T
    D A N I E L J O H N B U T K O AIA, NCARB, LEED AP, ASA Division of Architecture Associate Director & Gibbs Research Fellow Christopher C. Gibbs College of Architecture The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019 tel: 405.325.9411 email: [email protected] TEACHING + RESEARCH SUMMARY § Materials, Architectural Acoustics, Design Studios, Earthen Design & Construction, Design-Build § 39 published & presented papers, articles, posters, and invited conference session synopses including 16 journal entries (of the 39, 31 are uniquely published and 25 are blind peer-reviewed) § $350k+ in financial and in-kind contributions for research (internal and external sources) § Advisor to five students awarded the Newman Medal for excellence in Architectural Acoustics EDUCATION Master of Architecture - College of Design, Construction, and Planning in Architecture (DCP), The University of Florida (UF), May 2005. Emphasis in natural acoustics and lighting. Bachelor of Design in Architecture – College of Architecture, UF, High Honors, May 1998. TEACHING ASSIGNMENTS 1,275+ UG & Grad students: 23 semesters (F/S/Su) at OU and adjunct positions UF & K-State § Architectural Acoustics (developed course at OU and K-State from research initiatives) § Architecture Design Studios & coordinator: I, II, IV, V, VI, and VII with acoustics integration § Architectural Materials and Methods courses § CASA Playhouse: Design-Build Summer Course § Independent Study / Directed Reading courses (Compressed Earth Block, Materials, & Acoustics) § Earthen Design and Construction (developed course from research initiatives) § Environmental Technologies I and II (while adjunct at UF and K-State) § Introduction to Building Technology § Methods III and IV – Materials and Form (developed course from curriculum requirement) § Methods VII – Advanced Systems (developed course from curriculum requirement) § Precollegiate Mini-College (1st – 6th grade students) 2015 and 2016 Summers PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS + AFFILIATIONS § Registered Architect, State of Kansas, since 2007 License No.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Arabic and Chinese Rammed Earth Techniques in the Himalayan Region
    Sustainability 2012, 4, 2650-2660; doi:10.3390/su4102650 OPEN ACCESS sustainability ISSN 2071-1050 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Article Influence of Arabic and Chinese Rammed Earth Techniques in the Himalayan Region Paul Jaquin Integral Engineering Design, Tollbridge Studios, Bath, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] Received: 14 August 2012; in revised form: 24 September 2012 / Accepted: 8 October 2012 / Published: 15 October 2012 Abstract: This paper discusses different rammed earth construction technique in Asia. Rammed earth construction techniques from China, Indian, Nepal and Bhutan are examined. It is shown that these techniques are demonstrably different from each other, and argued that the techniques may have developed independently. Case study structures are discussed and it is shown that with care it is possible to chart the development of both techniques both chronologically and geographically. Keywords: rammed earth; formwork; rammer; Asia; Bhutan; Ladakh; Mustang, Hakka 1. Introduction In this paper we compare different aspects of rammed earth construction, focusing mainly on the formwork support and the rammer. The findings presented in this paper are a result of the author’s observations of a number of sites in Asia, and it is believed this is the first time such similarities and differences have been described. However, a detailed survey of many rammed earth structures has not been undertaken, and thus the conclusions, at this point, are tentative. 2. Rammed Earth Rammed earth is a simple construction technique based on compacting earth between formwork to make a homogeneous wall. It has recently become popular in Australia, the USA and other parts of the world because it is recognized as a sustainable building material.
    [Show full text]
  • Compressed Earth Blocks (CEB) with No Added Cement ENVIRONMENT
    Seguridad y Medio Ambiente - Nº 115 Page 1 of 15 Year 29 Nº 115 third quarter 2009 Compressed earth blocks (CEB) with no added cement ENVIRONMENT This article analyses the behaviour of compressed earth blocks (CEB) with no added cement, using various tests to do so. CEBs are an alternative wall building material offering significant economic and environmental advantages over traditional cement-based materials. This makes them a promising option for the construction industry. Por FERNANDO GALÍNDEZ. Universidad Católica de Salta. Facultad de Arquitectura This research project studies an alternative wall-building material called compressed earth block (CEB) with no added cement. Two main advantages accrue from removing cement from the basic CEB mixture: firstly, an economic benefit, because the price of cement makes the cost of the block much higher, and secondly an environmental benefit due to the impact of the cement manufacturing process. CEBs have a lower environmental burden than bricks because they are not kiln fired, but the addition of cement as stabiliser forfeits some of this environmental advantage. Generally, earth with a high clay content is considered unsuitable for making CEBs since clayey soil calls for more added cement than sandy soil to achieve acceptable strength. This is reflected in the IRAM (Argentinian Standardisation and Certification Institute) rules, which specify that up to 15% cement has to be added for making cement-stabilised earth blocks from clayey soils. This rules out a wide range of soils for making CEBs, unless there is the possibility of adding sand or, as a worse option, increasing the amount of cement.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study Into the Standard of Precast Sandcrete Blocks Produced by the Commercial Manufacturers in Sekondi-Takoradi
    University of Education,Winneba http://ir.uew.edu.gh UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, WINNEBA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, KUMASI A STUDY INTO THE STANDARD OF PRECAST SANDCRETE BLOCKS PRODUCED BY THE COMMERCIAL MANUFACTURERS IN SEKONDI/TAKORADI METROPOLIS SELASSIE KOFI FIAHAGBE 7151190008 A Dissertation in the Department of CONSTRUCTION AND WOOD TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, Faculty of TECHNICAL EDUCATION, submitted to the School of Graduate Studies, University of Education, Winneba, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for award of the Master of Technology (Construction Technology) degree DECEMBER, 2018 i University of Education,Winneba http://ir.uew.edu.gh DECLARATION STUDENT’S DECLARATION I, SELASSIE KOFI FIAHAGBE, declare that this Dissertation, with the exception of references quotations and references contained in published works which have all been identified and duly acknowledged, is entirely my own original work, and it has not been submitted, either in part or whole, for another degree elsewhere. SIGNATURE:………………………………………………………………………….. DATE:…………………………………………………………………..……………… SUPERVISOR’S DECLARATION I hereby declare that the preparation and presentation of this work was supervised in accordance with the guidelines for supervision of Dissertation as laid down by the University of Education, Winneba. NAME OF SUPERVISOR: PETER PAA-KOFI YALLEY (PhD CEng, UK) SIGNATURE:………………………………………………………………………….. DATE:…………………………………………………………………..……………… ii University of Education,Winneba http://ir.uew.edu.gh ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My first and foremost gratitude goes to the Almighty God for seeing me through this programme successfully. I am indebted to Peter Paa-Kofi Yalley (PhD CEng, UK), my supervisor and Mr. Jacob Ayamga Akumsigeya for their tireless effort, time and patience throughout the entire period of writing this dissertation. My appreciation also goes to Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Strawbale Vs Cob: Choosing the Best Natural Building Materials to Build Durably in Cold and Wet Climates
    Strawbale vs Cob: Choosing the best natural building materials to build durably in cold and wet climates Presented by: Sigi Koko Down to Earth Design natural building design hands-on workshops www.buildnaturally.com “Meet the present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” --UN definition of “sustainable” Down to Earth design WHAT are natural building materials? • locally available • rapidly renewable • non-toxic • use technology appropriately • provide multiple benefits Down to Earth design Inexpensive Materials + Simple Recipe for Construction Community Techniques = + “Barn- Labor Raising” Intensive Down to Earth design Understand Material Properties: insulation vs. thermal mass Down to Earth design INSULATION… …slows down how fast heat flows Down to Earth design USE INSULATION WHEN… …you have long periods of time where your desired temperature inside differs significantly from the temperature outside Down to Earth design INSULATING MATERIALS INCLUDE: straw hemp clay-slip straw pumice cotton wool air Down to Earth design INSULATION VALUES TO SHOOT FOR: Below a slab = R-10 If slab is heated = R-15 Crawl space floor = R-24 Walls = R-30 Roof envelope = R-48 Down to Earth design Don’t forget the detailing! Seal air spaces to avoid leakage. Down to Earth design THERMAL MASS IS… …a battery that stores heat energy Down to Earth design THERMAL MASS can be used to store heat Down to Earth design THERMAL MASS can be used to store coolness Down to Earth design USE THERMAL MASS WHEN… …you want to moderate
    [Show full text]