Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)

Japanese Journal of Systematic Entomology, 25 (2): 207–211. December 30, 2019.

Reexamination of Type Specimens of Longhorned Beetles Preserved in the Shujiro Hirayama Collection (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)

Tatsuya NIISATO 1), Kiyoshi MATSUDA 2) and Takeo YAMAUCHI 3) 1) Bioindicator Co., Ltd., Nikkô-Kagurazaka Building, Iwato-chô 18, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 162‒0832 Japan 2) Museum of Nature and Human Activities, Hyogo, Yayoigaoka, Sanda, Hyogo, 669–1546 Japan 3) Laboratory of Entomology, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada, Obihiro, Hokkaido, 080–8555 Japan

Abstract We report the results of our reexamination of type specimens of longhorned beetles in the Shujiro Hirayama collection preserved in the Museum of Nature and Human Activities, Hyogo. Eight holotypes were reidentified, and their habitus and labels were photographed. Of these, seven were originally described by Matsushita (1941) and one by Ohbayashi (1941a). The following taxonomic changes were proposed in accordance with the results of our reexamination of these holotypes: Acrocyrtidus longipes (Matsushita, 1941) is treated as a junior synonym of Acrocyrtidus elegantulus elegantulus (Matsushita, 1933); Novorondonia bisignata (Hayashi, 1974) is treated as a junior synonym of Novorondonia hirayamai (Matsushita, 1941), comb. nov.; Eutaenia formosana Matsushita, 1941 is treated as a junior synonym of Peblephaeus ziczac (Matsushita, 1940).

Introduction label are demarcated by double quotations (“ ”), and English translation for Japanese notation follows immediately after in Shujiro Hirayama (1887–1954) was a famous entomologist parentheses. Two types of appended labels are provided for all active in early days of the Japanese entomology. He operated type specimens, of which, the holotype label clearly indicates the Hirayama Museum in Inokashira Park, Tokyo, and “holotype” in red letters with the original name, and the published the entomological journal “Mushi no Sekai” as determination label shown with the updated scientific name. well as colour illustrated books such as “Illustrated Guide of Thousand Insects in Color (Hirayama, 1933, 1937 (2nd Type Specimens of Longhorned Beetles in ed.))” and “Illustrated Guide of Beetles in Color (Hirayama, Hirayama Collection 1940)”. His insect collection was organized for the purpose of exhibition at the museum, but specimens of longhorned Dymasius hirayamai Matsushita, 1941 beetles are especially numerous because his close colleague, (Fig. 1) Kazuo Ohbayashi, an excellent specialist of the group, had assisted him in sorting and classification (Suda, 2009, 2011). Dymasius hirayamai Matsushita, 1941: 153; type locality: In addition, Masaki Matsushita and K. Ohbayashi studied this “Formosa: Nanjin-san”. collection and published several papers including descriptions Dymasius (s. str.) hirayamai: Gressitt, 1951: 144 [status of new taxa (Matsushita, 1941; Ohbayashi, 1941b, 1948). (subgenus)]. After Hirayama’s death, his collection was transferred to the Dymasius (Elydnus) hirayamai: Nakamura, Makihara & Saito, Chigusagawa Green Life Insect Museum, Hyogo, and then, 1992: 25 [status (subgenus)]. with the closing the museum in 2008, to the Museum of Nature and Human Activities, Hyogo (Suda, 2009; Matsuda & Type specimen examined. Dymasius hirayamai Matsushita, Yamauchi, 2019). 1941: ♀ (holotype; MNHA), “Nanzinzan” “Formosa” “10. 4. 平山コレクション As mentioned above, the longhorned beetle specimens in 1939” / “Type” / “ (Hirayama Collection)” the Hirayama collection are very valuable and include type “15. C 17” / “HOLOTYPE” “Dymasius hirayamai” specimens, but no researchers had reexamined them during “Matsushita, 1941” “Appended label by” “Matsuda,” “Niisato the succeeding generations, so the actual taxonomic situation & Yamauchi, 2019” / “Dymasius” “hirayamai” “Matsushita, of these taxa remains unknown. Recently, we reexamined 1941” “Det. K. Matsuda, T. Niisato” “& T. Yamauchi, 2019”. these specimens in the Museum of Nature and Human Distribution. Taiwan; Japan (Yonaguni Is., Ryukyus). Activities, Hyogo, and reconfirmed a total of eight holotypes of the longhorned beetles described by Matsushita (1941) and Acrocyrtidus elegantulus elegantulus Ohbayashi (1941a). In the following paragraphs, we report the (Matsushita, 1933) results of our reexamination. (Fig. 2)

Lautitia elegantula Matsushita, 1933: 226, pl. 2, fig. 12; type Materials and methods locality: “Formosa (Kuskus)”. Materials used in the present study are all from the Acrocyrtidus elegantulus: Hayashi, 1962: 10 [combination]. collection preserved in the Museum of Nature and Human Acrocyrtidus elegantulus elegantulus: Löbl & Smetana, 2010: Activities, Hyogo (MNHA). 201 [status (subspecies)]. Label data of specimens examined are quoted verbatim, Mausaridaeus longipes Matsushita, 1941: 152; type locality: attached labels are separated by a slash (/), lines of the same “Formosa”. Syn. nov.

Type specimen examined. Mausaridaeus longipes Type specimen examined. Ropica formosana var. Matsushita, 1941: ♂ (holotype; MNHA), “Kuraru” “Formosa” hirayamai Matsushita, 1941: ♀ (holotype; MNHA), “Mt. “11. 4. 1939” / “Type” / “HOLOTYPE” “Mausaridaeus Taihei” “Formosa” “27. 7. 1935” / “Type” / “Ropica longipes” “Matsushita, 1941” “Appended label by” formosana” “Schwarzer var.” “hirayamai mihi.” “det. “Matsuda,” “Niisato & Yamauchi, 2019” / “Acrocyrtidus” Matsushita” / “ 平山修次郎 (Shujiro Hirayama)” “ コレクション “elegantulus elegantulus” “(Matsushita, 1933)” “Det. K. (Collection)” / “HOLOTYPE” “Ropica formosana” “Schwarzer Matsuda, T. Niisato” “& T. Yamauchi, 2019”. var. hirayamai” “Matsushita, 1941” “Appended label by” Distribution. Taiwan. “Matsuda,” “Niisato & Yamauchi, 2019” / “Novorondonia” Notes. Based on the original description, Mausaridaeus “hirayamai” “(Matsushita, 1941)” “Det. K. Matsuda, T. longipes Matsushita, 1941 is very similar to the male of Niisato” “& T. Yamauchi, 2019”. Lautitia elegantula Matsushita, 1933 (= Acrocyrtidus Distribution. Taiwan. elegantulus elegantulus (Matsushita, 1933)) and had Notes. In addition to the holotype of Ropica formosana suspected it to be its junior synonym. However, this problem var. hirayamai Matsushita, 1941, there is one specimen had remained because the holotype of the former had not identified as this taxon in the Hirayama collection. According been reexamined. Our examination resolves this longstanding to the original description by Matsushita (1941), this taxon is concern and identifies Mausaridaeus longipes as the male of distinguished from the nominotypical form of R. formosana Lautitia elegantula. by “1. Die Flügeldecken sind rotbraun, ungefleckt”, “2. Die Fühler sind verhältnismässig dicker als bei der Stammform”, Chlorophorus kanekoi Matsushita, 1941 “3. Der Körper viel Kleiner: 4 mm”, and the data of “Typus” (Fig. 3) is “Berg Taihei, 27. VII, 1935, im Museum HIRAYAMA zu Tokyo”. The original description strongly corresponds to the Chlorophorus diadema Motschulsky var. kanekoi Matsushita, characteristics of the specimen shown in Fig. 4, and there is 1941: 154; type locality: “Formosa: Kayahara”. no doubt that this specimen is the holotype from the data of Chlorophorus kanekoi: Hayashi, 1974: 30 [status (species)]. the attached label. Another specimen with a determination label written by the author (Masaki Matsushita) is different Type specimen examined. Chlorophorus diadema var. from the original description in colouration and body length kanekoi Matsushita, 1941: ♀ (holotype; MNHA), “Kayahara” as well as in collection label data. “Formosa” “29. 5. 1938” / “Type” / “Chlorophorus” “diadema This taxon was described as a variety of Ropica formosana var.” “kanekoi mihi.” “det. Matsushita” / “平山修次郎 (Shujiro Bates, 1866, but according to the generic definitions (Breuning, Hirayama)” “ コレクション (Collection)” / “HOLOTYPE” 1962; Rondon & Breuning, 1970), it belongs to the genus “Chlorophorus diadema var.” “kanekoi” “Matsushita, 1941” Novorondonia Özdikmen, 2008 based on the markedly thick “Appended label by” “Matsuda,” “Niisato & Yamauchi, 2019” antennae and distinctly longer antennomere III than in IV. / “Chlorophorus” “kanekoi” “Matsushita, 1941” “Det. K. Rondonia bisignata Hayashi, 1976 (= Novorondonia bisignata Matsuda, T. Niisato” & T. Yamauchi, 2019”. (Hayashi, 1976)) is treated as a junior synonym of this taxon Distribution. Taiwan. based on the description and figures in Hayashi (1976) and Notes. The correct identification of Chlorophorus kanekoi Chou (2008) . Matsushita, 1941 through reexamination of the holotype is very important for the taxonomic study of clytine beetles from Peblephaeus ziczac (Matsushita, 1940) Taiwan. Hayashi (1974) upgraded this taxon to an independent (Fig. 5) species from C. diadema (Motschulsky, 1854) without reexamining the holotype in the Hirayama collection. It had Etymestia ziczac Matsushita, 1940: 54; type locality: “Formosa long been questioned whether his treatment was truly correct (Musha)”. since there are several species of the genus Chlorophorus from Cereopsius ziczac: Breuning, 1961 : 350 [combination]. Taiwan, which are similar in maculation on the pronotum and Blephephaeus ziczac: Yokoyama, 1971: 97, 99, fig. 2 elytra. Our reexamination supports Hayashi’s (1974) treatment [combination]. without doubt. Peblephaeus ziczac: Kusama & Takakuwa, 1984: 13 [combination]. Novorondonia hirayamai (Matsushita, 1941), Eutaenia formosana Matsushita, 1941: 156; type locality: comb. nov. “Formosa: Kuskus”. Syn. nov. (Fig. 4) Type specimen examined. Eutaenia formosana Matsushita, Ropica formosana Schwarzer var. hirayamai Matsushita, 1941: ♂ (holotype; MNHA), “Kusukusu” “Formosa” “13. 平山修次郎コレクショ 1941: 154; type locality: “Berg Taihei”. 4. 1939” / “ (Shujiro Hirayama)” “ Rondonia bisignata Hayashi, 1976: 16; type locality: “Kenting ン (Collection)” / “HOLOTYPE” “Eutaenia formosana” Park, Pingtung Hsien”. Syn. nov. “Matsushita, 1941” “Appended label by” “Matsuda,” “Niisato Novorondonia bisignata: Özdikmen, 2008: 678 [combination]. & Yamauchi, 2019” / “Peblephaeus” “ziczac” “(Matsushita, Rhondonia [sic] bisignta: Niisato, Akiyama & Takakuwa, 1940)” “Det. K. Matsuda, T. Niisato” “& T. Yamauchi, 2019”. 2013: 312 [misspelling]. Distribution. Taiwan.

December 30, 2019, JJSE 25 (2) Type Specimens of Longhorned Beetles in Hirayama Collection 209

Figs. 1‒8. Type specimens with labels of longhorned beetles in the Hirayama collection preserved in Museum of Nature and Human Activities, Hyogo. ―― 1, Dymasius hirayamai Matsushita, 1941; 2, Mausaridaeus longipes Matsushita, 1941 (= Acrocyrtidus elegantulus elegantulus (Matsushita, 1933)); 3, Chlorophorus diadema var. kanekoi Matsushita, 1941 (= Chlorophorus kanekoi Matsushita, 1941); 4, Ropica formosana var. hirayamai Matsushita, 1941 (= Novorondonia hirayamai (Matsushita, 1941), comb. nov.); 5, Eutaenia formosana Matsushita, 1941 (= Peblephaeus ziczac (Matsushita, 1940)); 6, Rarasanus subfasciatus Matsushita, 1941 (= Nanohammus subfasciatus (Matsushita, 1941)); 7, Dihammus ohzui Ohbayashi, 1941 (= Acalolepta (Acalolepta) marianarum (Aurivillius, 1908)); 8, Oberea bicoloripes var. ishigakiana Matsushita, 1941 (= Oberea ishigakiana Matsushita, 1941).

December 30, 2019, JJSE 25 (2) 210 Niisato, T., K. Matsuda and T. Yamauchi

Notes. Eutaenia formosana Matsushita, 1941 had long 山修次郎 (Shujiro Hirayama)” “ コレクション (Collection)” remainded unidentified, because no species belonging to the / “HOLOTYPE” “Dihammus ohzui” “Ohbayashi, 1941” genus Eutaenia Thomson, 1857 had so far been rediscovered “Appended label by” “Matsuda,” “Niisato & Yamauchi, 2019” from Taiwan. Our reexamination has revealed that this taxon / “Acalolepta (Acalolepta)” “marianarum” “(Aurivillius, correctly belongs to the genus Peblephaeus Kusama et 1908)” “Det. K. Matsuda, T. Niisato” “& T. Yamauchi, 2019”. Takakuwa, 1984 and is a junior synonym of Etymestia ziczac Distribution. Mariana Isls. (Saipan, Tinian, Rota, and Matsushita, 1940 (= Peblephaeus ziczac (Matsushita, 1940)). Guam). The collecting data “19. IV, 1930” written in the original Notes. According to the original description, the holotype description is different from “13. 4. 1939” on the label of of Dihammus ohzui Ohbayashi, 1941 was thought to be in the this specimen, but the former date seems to be incorrect. Kazuo Ohbayashi collection, but we found and reexamined We considered this specimen as the holotype of Eutaenia it from the Hirayama collection. However, the holotypes formosana, since its characteristics are in agreement with the of Necydalis (s. str.) hirayamai and N. (s. str.) marginalis original description and there are no other specimens of this described by the same author (Ohbayashi, 1948) were clearly species in the Hirayama collection. stated in the original description as being preserved in the Hirayama Museum (Hirayama collection), though these Nanohammus subfasciatus (Matsushita, 1941) specimens are now in the Smithsonian Institution, Washington (Fig. 6) D. C (Lingafelter et al., 2014). It is unclear how these specimens were transferred from the Hirayama collection to Rarasanus subfasciatus Matsushita, 1941: 157; type locality: the foreign institute. “Formosa: Rarasan”. Nanohammus subfasciatus: Hayashi, 1962: 17, pl. 3, fig. 17 Oberea ishigakiana Matsushita, 1941 [combination, synonym and distribution]. (Fig. 8) Nanohammus taiyal Gressitt, 1951: 628; type locality: “Sankakuho, alt. 2,250 meters, above Musha, central Oberea bicoloripes Pic var. ishigakiana Matsushita, 1941: Formosa”. [synonymised by Hayashi, 1962: 17]. 158; type locality: “Ryukyu: Ishigaki-zima”. Nanohammus taiyai [sic]: Breuning, 1961: 353 [misspelling]. Obereopsis bicoloripes m. ishigakiana: Breuning, 1957: 87 [combination and status (morpha)]. Type specimen examined. Rarasanus subfasciatus Oberea ishigakiana: Breuning & Ohbayashi, 1961: 35 [status Matsushita, 1941: ♀ (holotype; MNHA), “Rarasan” “Formosa” (species)]. “15. 6. 1939” / “Type” / “Rarasanus” “subfasciatus “ ”mihi“ Oberea (Oberea) ishigakiana: Löbl & Smetana, 2010: 298 “ ララサンヒゲボソカミキリ (Rarasan-higeboso-kamikiri)” “det [status (subgenus)]. Matsushita” / “ 平山修次郎 (Shujiro Hirayama)” “ コレクション (Collection)” / “HOLOTYPE” “Rarasanus subfasciatus” Type specimen examined. Oberea bicoloripes Pic var. “Matsushita, 1941” “Appended label by” “Matsuda,” ishigakiana Matsushita, 1941: ♀ (holotype; MNHA), “Niisato & Yamauchi, 2019” / “Nanohammus” “subfasciatus” “Ishigaki” “Okinawa” “13, 4, 1939” / “HOLOTYPE” “Oberea “(Matsushita, 1941)” “Det. K. Matsuda, T. Niisato” “& T. bicoloripes” “Pic var. ishigakiana” “Matsushita, 1941” Yamauchi, 2019”. “Appended label by” “Matsuda,” “Niisato & Yamauchi, Distribution. Taiwan. 2019” / “Oberea” “ishigakiana” “Matsushita, 1941” “Det. K. Notes. Hayashi (1962) transferred Rarasanus subfasciatus Matsuda, T. Niisato” “& T. Yamauchi, 2019”. Matsushita, 1941 to the genus Nanohammus Bates, 1884 Distribution. Japan (Ryukyus: Ishigaki Is.). without examination of the holotype or any additional Notes. There was a mistake in label placement on the specimens of this species. In our present reexamination, this holotype of this taxon. In the Hirayama collection, a specimen species definitely belongs to Nanohammus. with morphological feature of Oberea bicoloripes Pic var. ishigakiana Matsushita, 1941 (= O. ishigakiana in present Acalolepta (Acalolepta) marianarum sense) was labeled as follows: “Mt. Sobo, Koonbaru” “Ooita- (Aurivillius, 1908) ken Kyushu” “11. viii. 1939” “Atsushi Kira” / “Oberea (Fig. 7) sp. nov. (handwriting by Kazuo Ohbayashi)”. On the other hand, a specimen with the characteristics of Oberea Monochamus (Haplohammus) Marianarum Aurivillius, 1908: sobosana Ohbayashi, 1956 was labeled as follows: “Ishigaki” 216; type locality: “Marianen-Inseln”. “Okinawa” “13, 4, 1939”. These two species can be easily Dihammus Marianarum: Aurivillius, 1922: 98 [combination]. distinguished from one another by the colouration of the Acalolepta marianarum: Breuning, 1961: 376 [combination]. elytra; almost entirely reddish yellow in O. ishigakiana, Dihammus ohzui Ohbayashi, 1941 a: 224; type locality: “Rota whereas reddish yellow only near the bases in O. sobosana. Is.” [synonymised by Gressitt, 1956: 113]. Furthermore, there are no specimens in the Hirayama collection with morphological features of O. ishigakiana other Type specimen examined. Dihammus ohzui Ohbayashi, than this specimen in question. Under these circumstances, it 1941: ♂ (holotype; MNHA), “Is. Rota” “Mariana Archip.” “24. is reasonable to assume that the labels of these two specimens XII. 1937” “Coll. N. Ohzu” / “niphohammus” “ohzui sp. nov.” have been accidentally switched, and the specimen with / “ 平山コレクション (Hirayama Collection)” “18. C 27” / “ 平

December 30, 2019, JJSE 25 (2) Type Specimens of Longhorned Beetles in Hirayama Collection 211 reddish yellow elytra is the holotype of Oberea bicoloripes Japanese.) var. ishigakiana. We returned these two labels to their correct Hirayama, S., 1940. [Illustrated Guide of Beetles in Color specimens. (Genshoku Kôchû Zufu).] 1–2 + 1–172 + 1–12 + 1–3 + 1–34 + 1–27, 52 pls. Sanseido, Tokyo. (In Japanese.) Kusama, K. & Y. Oda, 1979. Researches for Cerambycidae at Hui- Acknowledgements Sun Experimental Forest (Nantou Hsien, Central Taiwan) We wish to express our hearty thanks to Kiyoshi Ando in June, 1978. Reports of Faculty of Science, Shizuoka University, 13: 73–96. (Ehime University, Ehime, Japan), Michiaki Hasegawa Kusama, K. & M. Takakuwa, 1984. Descriptions of the new (Toyohashi Museum of Natural History, Aichi, Japan), genera, species and subspecies. Pp. 9–15. In Japanese Society Nobuo Ohbayashi (Kanagawa, Japan) and Junsuke Yamasako of Coleopterology (ed.), The Longicorn-Beetles of Japan in (Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, NARO, Tsukuba, Color. 565 pp. Kodansha, Tokyo. Japan) for the identifying the type specimens in the Hirayama Lingafelter, S. W., E. H. Nearns, G. L. Tavakilian, M. A. Monné collection and their kind helps with our study. Thanks are & M. Biondi, 2014. Longhorned Woodboring Beetles again due to Michiaki Hasegawa, Alyssa Suzumura (Hokkaido (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae and Distenidae): Primary Types University Museum, Sapporo, Japan) and Junsuke Yamasako of the Smithsonian Institution (Smithsonian Contribution to Knowkedge). 390 pp. Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press, for reviewing the original draft of this paper. Washington D.C. Löbl, I. & A. Smetana, 2010. Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, 6. References Chrysomeloidea. 924 pp. Apolo Book, Stenstrup. Matsuda, K. & T. Yamauchi, 2019. Longicorn beetles collection Aurivillius, C., 1908. Neue Coleoptera Longicornia (Col.) aus einer in the Museum of Nature and Human Activities, Hyogo. vom Herrn Gouverneur von Bennigsen zusammengebrachten Sayabane, Tokyo, (n. ser.), (34): 29–35. (In Japanese with Sammlung. Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift, Berlin, English title.) 1908: 211–224. Matsushita, M., 1933. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Cerambyciden des Aurivillius, C., 1922. Cerambycidae: Lamiinae. I. Coleopterorum Japanischen Reichs. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, of Catalogus pars 73 [vol. 23] I: 1–322. W. Junk & S. Schenkling, Hokkaido Imperial University, Sapporo, 34: 157–445 + i–ix, 5 Berlin. pls. Breuning, S., 1957. Révision du genre Obereopsis Chvrl. (Insecta: Matsushita, M., 1940. Zur Kenntnis der Japanischen Cerambyciden Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae). Indian Forest Records (V). Insecta Matsumurana, Sapporo, 14: 52–55. (n. ser.), Entomology, 9 [1955]: i–iii + 17–122. Matsushita, M., 1941. Zur Kenntnis der Japanischen Cerambyciden Breuning, S., 1961. Catalogue des Lamiaires du Monde. Verlag des (6). Insecta Matsumurana, Sapporo, 15: 151‒158. Museums G. Frey, Tutzing bei München, (5): 287–382. Nakamura, S., H. Makihara & A. Saito, 1992. Check-list of Breuning, S., 1962. Contribution à la connaissance des Lamiens Longicorn-beetles of Taiwan. 126 pp. Hiba Society of Natural du Laos Coll. Céramb (Coll. Céramb.). Deuxième Partie. History, Shobara. Bulletin de la Société Royale des Sciences Naturelles du Laos, Niisato, T., H. Akiyama & M. Takakuwa, 2013. Palausybra chibi Vientiane, 3: 7–10. (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) found on southeastern coast of Breuning, S. & K. Ohbayashi, 1961. Nouveaux Lamiaires du Japon the mainland of Taiwan. Elytra, Tokyo, (n. ser.), 3: 310–312. (3e partie) (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). Bulletin of the Japan Ohbayashi, K., 1941 a. Longicorn beetles from Mariana. Tenthredo Entomological Academy, Nagoya, 2: 31–36. Acta Entomologica, Kyoto, 3: 223–229. Chou, W.-I., 2008. The Atlas of Taiwanese Cerambycidae (2nd ed.). Ohbayashi, K., 1941 b. Note on some longicorn-beetles of Japan. 408 pp. Owl Publishing House, Taipei. Mushi no Sekai, Tokyo, 4: 1–8, pl. 3. Gressitt, J. L., 1951. Longicorn beetles of China. Longicornia, 2. Ohbayashi, K., 1948. Studies of longicornia. Entomological Review 667 pp, 22 pls. Paul Lechevalier, Paris. of Japan, Osaka, 1: 12–14, pl. 1. Gressitt, J. L., 1956. Coleoptera: Cerambycidae. Insects of Özdikmen, H., 2008. Substitute names for some preoccupied Micronesia, Honolulu, 17: 61–183. longhorned beetles genus group names described by S. Hayashi, M., 1962. The Cerambycidae from Amami-Ôshima Breuning (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Munis Entomology & Islands. II, Additions to the cerambycid-fauna of the Loochoo- Zoology, Ankara, 3: 677–681. Archpelago. 2 (Col.). Entomological Review of Japan, Osaka, Rondon, J. A. & S. Breuning, 1970. Lamiines du Laos. Pacific 14: 8–18. Insects Monograph, Honolulu, 24: 315–571. Hayashi, M., 1974. New and unrecorded longicorn beetles from Suda, M., 2009. [Raise and decline of the museum in Inokashira Taiwan (Coleoptera; Cerambycidae) I. Bulletin of the Osaka Park Zoo; Focusing on insect collection.] 11 pp. (In Japanese.) Jonan Women's Junior College, (9): 1–36. Suda, M., 2011. [A boy’s memory of insects; Raise and decline of Hayashi, M., 1976. Studies on Asian Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) insects in Tokyo (Lecture record).] Kachôfûgetsu, Odawara, I. Bulletin of the Osaka Jonan Women's Junior College, (11): (146): 2–16. (In Japanese.) 1–24. Yokoyama, H., 1971. The Cerambycidae from Ryukyu and Hirayama, S., 1933. [Illustrated Guide of Thousand Insects in Color Satsunan Islands, II. (Coleoptera). Entomological Review of (Genshoku Senshu Konchû Zufu).] 1–2 + 1–2 + 1–186 + 1–18 Japan, Osaka, 23: 93–101. + 1–23 + 1–23, 104 pls. Sanseido, Tokyo. (In Japanese.) Hirayama, S., 1937. [Illustrated Guide of Thousand Insects in Color (Sequel ed.) (Genshoku Senshu Zoku Konchû Zufu).] 1–2 + [Received: September 30, 2019; accepted: November 19, 2019] 1–194 + 1–28 + 1–3 + 1–40 + 1–2, 88 pls. Sanseido, Tokyo. (In

December 30, 2019, JJSE 25 (2)