DOCSLIB.ORG

Report of the SIXTH FAO EXPERT ADVISORY PANEL for the ASSESSMENT of PROPOSALS to AMEND APPENDICES I and II of CITES CONCERNING COMMERCIALLY-EXPLOITED AQUATIC SPECIES

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report of the SIXTH FAO EXPERT ADVISORY PANEL for the ASSESSMENT of PROPOSALS to AMEND APPENDICES I and II of CITES CONCERNING COMMERCIALLY-EXPLOITED AQUATIC SPECIES FIAF/R1255 (En) FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report ISSN 2070-6987 Report of the SIXTH FAO EXPERT ADVISORY PANEL FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF PROPOSALS TO AMEND APPENDICES I AND II OF CITES CONCERNING COMMERCIALLY-EXPLOITED AQUATIC SPECIES Rome, 21‒25 January 2019 FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report No. 1255 FIAF/R1255 (En) Report of the SIXTH FAO EXPERT ADVISORY PANEL FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF PROPOSALS TO AMEND APPENDICES I AND II OF CITES CONCERNING COMMERCIALLY-EXPLOITED AQUATIC SPECIES Rome, 21‒25 January 2019 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2019 Required citation: FAO. 2019. Report of the Sixth FAO Expert Advisory Panel for the Assessment of Proposals to Amend Appendices I and II of CITES Concerning Commercially Exploited Aquatic Species, Rome, 21–25 January 2019. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report No. 1255. Rome. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-131315-2 © FAO, 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that FAO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the FAO logo is not permitted. If the work is adapted, then it must be licensed under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If a translation of this work is created, it must include the following disclaimer along with the required citation: “This translation was not created by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original [Language] edition shall be the authoritative edition.” Disputes arising under the licence that cannot be settled amicably will be resolved by mediation and arbitration as described in Article 8 of the licence except as otherwise provided herein. The applicable mediation rules will be the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/mediation/rules and any arbitration will be conducted in accordance with the Arbitration Rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). Third-party materials. Users wishing to reuse material from this work that is attributed to a third party, such as tables, figures or images, are responsible for determining whether permission is needed for that reuse and for obtaining permission from the copyright holder. The risk of claims resulting from infringement of any third-party-owned component in the work rests solely with the user. Sales, rights and licensing. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/publications) and can be purchased through [email protected]. Requests for commercial use should be submitted via: www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request. Queries regarding rights and licensing should be submitted to: [email protected]. iii PREPARATION OF THIS DOCUMENT This is the report of the Sixth FAO Expert Advisory Panel for the Assessment of Proposals to Amend Appendices I and II of CITES Concerning Commercially-Exploited Aquatic Species (Expert Panel), held at FAO headquarters from 21 to 25 January 2019. The meeting of the Expert Panel was funded by the FAO Regular Programme with extra assistance from the Governments of Japan and the European Union. The figures presented in this document are reproduced as they appear in the source materials from which they were obtained: there is thus some variability in terms of languages, image quality and labelling styles. iv ABSTRACT The Sixth FAO Expert Advisory Panel for the Assessment of Proposals to Amend Appendices I and II of CITES Concerning Commercially Exploited Aquatic Species was held at FAO headquarters from 21 to 25 January 2019. The Expert Panel was convened in response to the agreement by the Twenty-Fifth session of the FAO Committee on Fisheries (COFI) on the terms of reference for an expert advisory panel for assessment of proposals to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), and following endorsement from the Twenty-Sixth session of COFI to convene the Expert Panel for relevant proposals to future CITES Conference of the Parties. The objectives of the Expert Panel were to: i. assess each proposal from a scientific perspective in accordance with the CITES biological listing criteria (Resolution Conf. 9.24 [Rev. CoP17]); ii. comment, as appropriate, on technical aspects of the proposal in relation to biology, ecology, trade and management issues, as well as, to the extent possible, the likely effectiveness for conservation. The Expert Panel considered the following four proposals submitted to the eighteenth Conference of the Parties to CITES: • CoP18 Prop. 42. Proposal to include the mako shark, Isurus oxyrinchus in Appendix II in accordance with Article II paragraph 2(a) and Isurus paucus in Appendix II in accordance with Article II paragraph 2(b). The Expert Panel assessment of Proposal 42 concluded that the available data do not provide evidence that the species meets the CITES Appendix II listing criteria. • CoP18 Prop. 43. Proposal to include blackchin guitarfish Glaucostegus cemiculus and the sharpnose guitarfish, Glaucostegus granulatus in Appendix II in accordance with Article II paragraph 2(a) and inclusion of all other giant guitarfish, Glaugostegus spp. in accordance with Article II paragraph 2(b). The Expert Panel assessment of Proposal 43 concluded that there was insufficient evidence to make a decision in relation to CITES criteria, recommending that CITES Parties take note of the one example of extirpation, the widespread lack of management and the very high value of guitarfish fins in international trade. • CoP18 Prop. 44. Proposal to include white-spotted wedgefish, Rhynchobatus australiae and Rhynchobatus djiddensis in Appendix II in accordance with Article II paragraph 2(a). If listed, this would include Rhynchobatus cooki, Rhynchobatus immaculatus, Rhynchobatus laevis, Rhynchobatus luebberti, Rhynchobatus palpebratus, Rhynchobatus springeri, Rhynchorhina mauritaniensis, Rhina ancylostoma, and all other putative species of the Rhinidae (wedgefish) family in Appendix II in accordance with Article II paragraph 2(b). The Expert Panel assessment of Proposal 44 concluded that there was insufficient evidence to make a decision in relation to CITES criteria, recommending that CITES Parties take note of the widespread lack of management and the very high value of wedgefish fins in international trade. • CoP18 Prop. 45. Proposal to include the subgenus Holothuria (Microthele): Holothuria fuscogilva, Holothuria nobilis and Holothuria whitmaei in Appendix II in accordance with Article II paragraph 2(a). The Expert Panel assessment of Proposal 45 concluded that the available data for Holothuria fuscogilva does not meet the CITES Appendix II listing criteria, that there was insufficient evidence to make a determination for Holothuria nobilis, but that Holothuria whitmaei does meet the CITES Appendix II listing criteria. The report includes an assessment of each of the four proposals in-line with the objectives outlined above, highlighting the Expert Panel’s determination of whether information on the species in question meet the CITES Appendix criteria, and noting biology, ecology, trade and management issues, as well as, to the extent possible, the likely effectiveness of a listing for conservation. v CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Background and purpose of the Expert Panel ................................................................................................ 1 The Expert Panel meeting .............................................................................................................................. 1 Proposals of commercial aquatic species for CoP 18 .................................................................................... 2 FAO EXPERT ADVISORY PANEL ASSESSMENT REPORT: COP18 PROPOSAL 42 ............................. 5 Assessment summary .................................................................................................................................... 5 Scientific assessment in accordance with CITES biological listing criteria .................................................. 5 Comments on technical aspects relating to management, trade and likely effectiveness of implementation of a CITES
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shark and Ray Products in the Processing Centres Of
    S H O R T R E P O R T ALIFA BINTHA HAQUE BINTHA ALIFA 6 TRAFFIC Bulletin Vol. 30 No. 1 (2018) TRAFFIC Bulletin 30(1) 1 May 2018 FINAL.indd 8 5/1/2018 5:04:26 PM S H O R T R E P O R T OBSERVATIONS OF SHARK AND RAY Introduction PRODUCTS IN THE PROCESSING early 30% of all shark and ray species are now designated as Threatened or Near Threatened with extinction CENTRES OF BANGLADESH, according to the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. This is a partial TRADEB IN CITES SPECIES AND understanding of the threat status as 47% of shark species have not CONSERVATION NEEDS yet been assessed owing to data deficiency (Camhi et al., 2009;N Bräutigam et al., 2015; Dulvy et al., 2014). Many species are vulnerable due to demand for their products Alifa Bintha Haque, and are particularly prone to unsustainable fishing practices Aparna Riti Biswas and (Schindler et al., 2002; Clarke et al., 2007; Dulvy et al., Gulshan Ara Latifa 2008; Graham et al., 2010; Morgan and Carlson, 2010). Sharks are exploited primarily for their fins, meat, cartilage, liver oil and skin (Clarke, 2004), whereas rays are targeted for their meat, skin, gill rakers and livers. Most shark catch takes place in response to demand for the animals’ fins, which command high prices (Jabado et al., 2015). Shark fin soup is a delicacy in many Asian countries—predominantly China—and in many other countries (Clarke et al., 2007). Apart from the fins being served in high-end restaurants, there is a demand for other products in different markets and by different consumer groups, and certain body parts are also used medicinally (Clarke et al., 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • COVER PAGE: Title: Genomics to Aid Species Delimitation and Effective
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/767186; this version posted September 12, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. COVER PAGE: Title: Genomics to aid species delimitation and effective conservation of the Sharpnose Guitarfish (Glaucostegus granulatus). Authors: Shaili Johri1 (First Author) Sam Fellows1 Jitesh Solanki2 Anissa Busch1 Isabella Livingston1 Maria Fernanda Mora1 Anjani Tiwari3 Asha Goodman1 Adrian Cantu1 Michael P. Doane4 Megan Morris5 Robert A. Edwards1 Elizabeth A. Dinsdale 1 Author information: 1. Department of Biology 5500 Campanile Dr. San Diego State University San Diego, CA 92128 2. College of Fisheries Science Rajendra Bhuvan Road, Junagadh Agricultural University Veraval, Gujarat 362266, India. 3. Dept. of Biochemistry Maharaja Sayajirao University Baroda, India. 380015. 4. Sydney Institute of Marine Sciences 19 Chowder Bay Rd, Mosman, NSW 2095 5. Dept. of Biology Stanford University 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/767186; this version posted September 12, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Author Contributions: SJ contributed to concept, sampling, sequencing, Bioinformatics and wrote the manuscript, JS contributed to sampling, DNA extractions and sequencing, MMora, IL, AG and AB contributed to PCR and BOLD sequence alignments, ED contributed to concept and editing of the manuscript, SF did the phylogenetic analyses, AT contributed to molecular analyses, and community networks, to understand fisheries practices and for sampling logistics, AC and RE assisted with bioinformatics including basecalling and assembly, MMorris and MD assisted with sequence analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Philippine Chondrichthyes
    CSIRO MARINE LABORATORIES Report 243 CHECKLIST OF PHILIPPINE CHONDRICHTHYES Compagno, L.J.V., Last, P.R., Stevens, J.D., and Alava, M.N.R. May 2005 CSIRO MARINE LABORATORIES Report 243 CHECKLIST OF PHILIPPINE CHONDRICHTHYES Compagno, L.J.V., Last, P.R., Stevens, J.D., and Alava, M.N.R. May 2005 Checklist of Philippine chondrichthyes. Bibliography. ISBN 1 876996 95 1. 1. Chondrichthyes - Philippines. 2. Sharks - Philippines. 3. Stingrays - Philippines. I. Compagno, Leonard Joseph Victor. II. CSIRO. Marine Laboratories. (Series : Report (CSIRO. Marine Laboratories) ; 243). 597.309599 1 CHECKLIST OF PHILIPPINE CHONDRICHTHYES Compagno, L.J.V.1, Last, P.R.2, Stevens, J.D.2, and Alava, M.N.R.3 1 Shark Research Center, South African Museum, Iziko–Museums of Cape Town, PO Box 61, Cape Town, 8000, South Africa 2 CSIRO Marine Research, GPO Box 1538, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001, Australia 3 Species Conservation Program, WWF-Phils., Teachers Village, Central Diliman, Quezon City 1101, Philippines (former address) ABSTRACT Since the first publication on Philippines fishes in 1706, naturalists and ichthyologists have attempted to define and describe the diversity of this rich and biogeographically important fauna. The emphasis has been on fishes generally but these studies have also contributed greatly to our knowledge of chondrichthyans in the region, as well as across the broader Indo–West Pacific. An annotated checklist of cartilaginous fishes of the Philippines is compiled based on historical information and new data. A Taiwanese deepwater trawl survey off Luzon in 1995 produced specimens of 15 species including 12 new records for the Philippines and a few species new to science.
    [Show full text]
  • Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997
    The IUCN Species Survival Commission Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997 Edited by Sarah L. Fowler, Tim M. Reed and Frances A. Dipper Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 25 IUCN The World Conservation Union Donors to the SSC Conservation Communications Programme and Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management: Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997 The IUCN/Species Survival Commission is committed to communicate important species conservation information to natural resource managers, decision-makers and others whose actions affect the conservation of biodiversity. The SSC's Action Plans, Occasional Papers, newsletter Species and other publications are supported by a wide variety of generous donors including: The Sultanate of Oman established the Peter Scott IUCN/SSC Action Plan Fund in 1990. The Fund supports Action Plan development and implementation. To date, more than 80 grants have been made from the Fund to SSC Specialist Groups. The SSC is grateful to the Sultanate of Oman for its confidence in and support for species conservation worldwide. The Council of Agriculture (COA), Taiwan has awarded major grants to the SSC's Wildlife Trade Programme and Conservation Communications Programme. This support has enabled SSC to continue its valuable technical advisory service to the Parties to CITES as well as to the larger global conservation community. Among other responsibilities, the COA is in charge of matters concerning the designation and management of nature reserves, conservation of wildlife and their habitats, conservation of natural landscapes, coordination of law enforcement efforts as well as promotion of conservation education, research and international cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Glaucostegus Granulatus) T ⁎ Shaili Johria,F, , Sam R
    Meta Gene 24 (2020) 100648 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Meta Gene journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mgene Mitochondrial genome to aid species delimitation and effective conservation of the Sharpnose Guitarfish (Glaucostegus granulatus) T ⁎ Shaili Johria,f, , Sam R. Fellowsa, Jitesh Solankib, Anissa Buscha, Isabella Livingstona, Maria Fernanda Moraa, Anjani Tiwaric, Vito Adrian Cantua, Asha Goodmana, Megan M. Morrise, Michael P. Doaned, Robert A. Edwardsa, Elizabeth A. Dinsdalea a Department of Biology, 5500 Campanile Dr., San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92128, United States of America b College of Fisheries Science, Rajendra Bhuvan Road, Junagadh Agricultural University, Veraval, Gujarat 362266, India c Dept. of Biochemistry, Maharaja Sayajirao University, Baroda 380015, India d Sydney Institute of Marine Sciences, 19 Chowder Bay Rd, Mosman, NSW 2095, Australia e Dept. of Biology, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, United States of America f Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, 120 Ocean View Blvd, Pacific Grove 93950, United States of America ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: We present the complete mitochondrial genome of the Sharpnose/Granulated Guitarfish Glaucostegus granulatus, Sharks obtained with whole genome shotgun sequencing of genomic DNA. The 16,547 bp long circular genome con- Conservation sisted of 13 protein-coding genes, 22 tRNA genes, 2 rRNA genes, and a non-coding control region. A few protein- fi Guitar shes coding genes ended with incomplete stop codons. Phylogenetic analysis provided strong support for the spe- Critically-endangered cimen to be identified as G. granulatus and improved resolution of phylogeny within the genus Glaucostegus such Nanopore as placing G. thouin in a sister group with G.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Coral
    Australia’s Coral Sea: A Biophysical Profile 2011 Dr Daniela Ceccarelli 2011 Dr Daniela Ceccarelli Coral Sea: A Biophysical Profile Australia’s Australia’s Coral Sea A Biophysical Profile Dr. Daniela Ceccarelli August 2011 Australia’s Coral Sea: A Biophysical Profile Photography credits Author: Dr. Daniela M. Ceccarelli Front and back cover: Schooling great barracuda © Jurgen Freund Dr. Daniela Ceccarelli is an independent marine ecology Page 1: South West Herald Cay, Coringa-Herald Nature Reserve © Australian Customs consultant with extensive training and experience in tropical marine ecosystems. She completed a PhD in coral reef ecology Page 2: Coral Sea © Lucy Trippett at James Cook University in 2004. Her fieldwork has taken Page 7: Masked booby © Dr. Daniela Ceccarelli her to the Great Barrier Reef and Papua New Guinea, and to remote reefs of northwest Western Australia, the Coral Sea Page 12: Humphead wrasse © Tyrone Canning and Tuvalu. In recent years she has worked as a consultant for government, non-governmental organisations, industry, Page 15: Pink anemonefish © Lucy Trippett education and research institutions on diverse projects requiring field surveys, monitoring programs, data analysis, Page 19: Hawksbill turtle © Jurgen Freund reporting, teaching, literature reviews and management recommendations. Her research and review projects have Page 21: Striped marlin © Doug Perrine SeaPics.com included studies on coral reef fish and invertebrates, Page 22: Shark and divers © Undersea Explorer seagrass beds and mangroves, and have required a good understanding of topics such as commercial shipping Page 25: Corals © Mark Spencer impacts, the effects of marine debris, the importance of apex predators, and the physical and biological attributes Page 27: Grey reef sharks © Jurgen Freund of large marine regions such as the Coral Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Information for Wedgefishes (Rhinidae) and Giant Guitarfishes (Glaucostegidae)
    Supplementary Information for wedgefishes (Rhinidae) and giant guitarfishes (Glaucostegidae) Generation lengths There is a general lack of age and growth data for wedgefishes (Rhinidae) and giant guitarfishes (Glaucostegidae). Maximum age given by White et al. (2014) for female Rhynchobatus spp. (mixed samples of R. australiae and R. palpebratus) was 12 years. However, this figure alone is not useful to estimate generation length as White et al. (2014) did not provide female age at maturity, and the maximum age estimate was for a 183 cm total length (TL) individual, whereas R. palpebratus grows to 262 cm TL and R. australiae to ~300 cm TL (Last et al. 2016). To provide a more realistic generation length estimate for large rhinid species as well as large glaucostegid species (those species reaching ≥200 cm TL), data can be used from White et al. (2014) for the Giant Guitarfish (Glaucostegus typus): • Female age at maturity: 7 years (taken from the growth curve) • Female maximum age: 19 years (for a 250 cm TL individual which is under but close to the maximum size of 270 cm TL; Last et al. 2016) • Calculated generation length: 13 years • Estimated generation length: 15 years (to account for the larger maximum size of the species compared with the largest individual aged) For Glaucostegus cemiculus, Enajjar et al. (2012) found a female age at maturity of 5.1 years, and a maximum age of 14 years, which gives a generation length of 9.5 years. The largest specimen examined in this study was 198 cm TL, while the species reaches a maximum size of 265 cm TL; 9.5 years would therefore be an underestimate of generation length.
    [Show full text]
  • Guitarfishescop18 Prop
    GuitarfishesCoP18 Prop. 43 to include the blackchin guitarfish (Glau- costegus cemiculos) and the sharpnose guitarfish (Glaucostegus granulatus) in Appendix II in accordance with Article II paragraph 2a, and all other giant guitarfish - family Glau- costegidae - in Appendix II in accordance with Article II paragraph 2b. Sponsored by: Bangladesh, Benin, Bhutan, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Chad, Cote d’Ivoire, Egypt, European Union, Gabon, Gambia, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Monaco, Nepal, Niger, Nigeria, Palau, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Togo, and Ukraine. © Anne Hoggett RECOMMEND: SUPPORT ADOPTION OF PROPOSAL The proposal to include the blackchin guitarfish (Glau- costegus cemiculos), sharpnose guitarfish (Glaucostegus granulatus), and other giant guitarfish in the family Glaucostegidae in Appendix II is necessary to regulate international trade and prevent future declines driven by the demand from the international fin trade. Ac- cording to the IUCN/TRAFFIC Analyses of Propos- als to CoP18, all species in the Family Glaucostegidae have been recently re-classified as Critically Endan- gered on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Figure 3. Distribution of blackchin guitarfish DISTRIBUTION Glaucostegus cemiculus. Source: IUCN, 2018. Blackchin guitarfish are found in the eastern Atlantic from Portugal, throughout the Mediterranean, and as far south as Angola (Last et al., 2016). Sharpnose guitarfish are found in the north Western Indian Ocean, from the United Arab Emir- ates to Myanmar (Marshall and Last, 2016). THREATS International demand for fins drives much of the targeted and unsustainable catch of Glaucostegidae across their ranges, and consequential depletion of stocks. Blackchin guitarfish are consumed domesti- Figure 4. Distribution of sharpnose guitarfish cally in West Africa as fresh or dried fish, known as Glaucostegus granulatus.
    [Show full text]
  • Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997
    The IUCN Species Survival Commission Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997 Edited by Sarah L. Fowler, Tim M. Reed and Frances A. Dipper Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 25 IUCN The World Conservation Union Donors to the SSC Conservation Communications Programme and Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management: Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997 The IUCN/Species Survival Commission is committed to communicate important species conservation information to natural resource managers, decision-makers and others whose actions affect the conservation of biodiversity. The SSC's Action Plans, Occasional Papers, newsletter Species and other publications are supported by a wide variety of generous donors including: The Sultanate of Oman established the Peter Scott IUCN/SSC Action Plan Fund in 1990. The Fund supports Action Plan development and implementation. To date, more than 80 grants have been made from the Fund to SSC Specialist Groups. The SSC is grateful to the Sultanate of Oman for its confidence in and support for species conservation worldwide. The Council of Agriculture (COA), Taiwan has awarded major grants to the SSC's Wildlife Trade Programme and Conservation Communications Programme. This support has enabled SSC to continue its valuable technical advisory service to the Parties to CITES as well as to the larger global conservation community. Among other responsibilities, the COA is in charge of matters concerning the designation and management of nature reserves, conservation of wildlife and their habitats, conservation of natural landscapes, coordination of law enforcement efforts as well as promotion of conservation education, research and international cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • AC26 Doc. 16.2, Annex IL
    AC26 Doc. 16.2, Annex Israel – p. 1 Israel Nature and Parks Authority www.parks.org.il Science Division, Department of Ecology Scientific Authority for Israel for the CITES Convention Response of Israel to Notification No. 2011/049 Information to be submitted for the 26th meeting of the Animals Committee Prepared by Dr. Simon C. Nemtzov, Israel's Scientific Authority for CITES Sharks and Rays Domestic measures Israel has included the elasmobranchs in its list of protected species. Specifically listed as protected in the latest (2005) regulations, are all sharks (Order Selachii) and all rays (Order Batoidae). They may not be captured, harmed, traded or kept, without a specific permit from the Israel Nature and Parks Authority (INPA). The INPA had begun a recent campaign to increase awareness of the need to protect these species and has increased enforcement efforts against fishing of these species. A new information sheet about the importance of sharks in the ecosystem and the regulations against fishing them, was prepared in Hebrew and Arabic (Israel's two official languages) and is attached at the end of this report. Similarly, any import or export of sharks and rays (alive or dead), or any parts and derivatives of these species requires an import or export permit from the INPA. Live specimens also require a permit from the Fishery Department of the Ministry of Agriculture. Species of Concern for Possible Consideration by the Animals Committee Israel has concern over the conservation status of guitarfish of the genus Glaucostegus; Israel is a range state for two of these species.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Edition
    TRAFFIC 1 BULLETIN VOL. 30 NO. 1 30 NO. VOL. TRAFFIC is the leading non-governmental organisation working globally on trade in wild animals and plants in the context of both biodiversity conservation and sustainable development. For further information contact: The Executive Director TRAFFIC David Attenborough Building Pembroke Street Cambridge CB2 3QZ UK Telephone: (44) (0) 1223 277427 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.traffic.org SUMATRA’S CAGE BIRD TRADE CHINA’S GREEN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT SHARKS AND RAYS IN BANGLADESH is a strategic alliance of is a APRIL 2018 The journal of the TRAFFIC network disseminates information on the trade in wild animal and plant resources 30(1) COVER FINAL.indd 1 5/1/2018 3:17:37 PM INTERNATIONAL Headquarters Office David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, TRAFFIC was established Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK. Tel: (44) 1223 277427; E-mail: [email protected] in 1976 to perform what remains a unique role as a AFRICA Central Africa Regional Office c/o IUCN, Regional Office for Central Africa, global specialist, leading and PO Box 5506, Yaoundé, Cameroon. Tel: (237) 2206 7409; Fax: (237) 2221 6497; E-mail: [email protected] supporting efforts to identify East/Southern Africa Regional Office c/o IUCN ESARO, 1st Floor, Hatfield Gables 484 Hilda Street, Hatfield, Pretoria 0083, SouthAfrica. and address conservation Tel: (27) 12 342 8304/5; Fax: (27) 12 342 8289; E-mail: [email protected] challenges and solutions Tanzania Office c/o WWF-Tanzania Country Office, 350 Regent Estate, Mikocheni, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. linked to trade in wild Tel/Fax: (255) 22 2701676; E-mail: [email protected] NATURE PICTURE LIBRARY / WWF PICTURE LIBRARY NATURE animals and plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy of Exploited Demersal Finfishes of India: Lizardfishes, Pigface Breams, 4 Eels, Guitar Fishes and Pomfrets T.M
    Taxonomy of Exploited Demersal Finfishes of India: Lizardfishes, Pigface breams, 4 Eels, Guitar fishes and Pomfrets T.M. Najmudeen and P.U. Zacharia Demersal Fisheries Division Demersal fishes are those fishes which live and feed on or near the bottom of seas. They occupy the sea floors, which usually consist of mud, sand, gravel or rocks. In coastal waters they are found on or near the continental shelf, and in deep waters they are found on or near the continental slope or along the continental rise. In India, demersal finfishes contribute about 26% to the total marine fish landings of the country, which is dominated by perches, croakers, catfishes, silverbellies, elasmobranchs, lizardfishes, flat fishes, pomfrets, etc., in order of abundance. Most of the demersal finfishes in India are exploited by mechanised trawlers. Taxonomic research on fishes in general and other taxa of the animal kingdom was conducted extensively in the earlier periods by various research and survey organisation of the country. The Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), which is primarily concerned with research and development of marine organisms, from the production point of view, made several taxonomic contributions on marine Training Manual on Species Identification invertebrates, fishes, reptiles and mammals, mostly in the decade of 60s and 70s. However, the taxonomic research in general in the country appears neglected and it is imperative to bring back the subject in order to conserve and rational utilisation of exploited marine fishery resource of the country. In the following sections, the classification of some of the demersal finfish resources such as pigface breams, lizardfishes and eels exploited along the coastal waters of India are described.
    [Show full text]