DOCSLIB.ORG

Planet X” Pluto in 1930, Lowell Observatory, Flagstaff, Arizona and Confirmation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planet X” Pluto in 1930, Lowell Observatory, Flagstaff, Arizona and Confirmation The discovery of two new satellites of Pluto Max Mutchler Space Telescope Science Institute Open Night 3 January 2006 Andy Lubenow 1956 - 2005 Hubble Pluto Satellite Search Team Overview reporting the discovery to the New Horizons Science Team on November 2, 2005 at the Kennedy Space Center • Discovery of Pluto, Charon, and the Kuiper Belt •Early Hubble observations of Pluto • Hubble mission support for New Horizons: discovery of two more Pluto satellites • Confirming and following-up the discovery • Implications, and recent related discoveries Left to Right: • New Horizons mission update by Hal Weaver Hal Weaver (JHU/APL), Andrew Steffl (SwRI), S. Alan Stern (SwRI), Leslie Young (SwRI), John Spencer (SwRI), Marc Buie (Lowell Observatory), • Questions? Bill Merline (SwRI), Max Mutchler (STScI), and…Eliot Young (SwRI) The discovery of The search for “Planet X” Pluto in 1930, Lowell Observatory, Flagstaff, Arizona and confirmation Percival Lowell Vesto Slipher Clyde Tombaugh 1 The discovery of Pluto’s moon Charon in 1978 James Christy and Robert Harrington, U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, D.C. • 1950 Kuiper & Humason, didn’t find Charon • 1978 Christy & Harrington, serendipitous discovery of Charon (above) • 1991 Stern: found no more satellites beyond ~100,000 km from Pluto • 2005 Gladman et al. paper -- seemed to doom this Hubble search The slowly emerging picture of Pluto Charon 1200 km Earth Pluto Moon 12,800 km 2300 km 3000 km 2 Everything we know about Pluto 1 • 1930 Pluto discovered; eccentric orbit * • 1955 rotation period 6.4 days Pluto has not • 1965 stable 3:2 resonant orbit with Neptune given up it’s secrets • 1973 obliquity > 90 deg * • 1976 methane ice on surface; size constrained very easily over • 1978 Charon discovered; “binary planet” * the first 75 years… • 1980 Occultation reveals Charon radius to be 600 km • 1985 Pluto-Charon mutual events begin Everything we know about Pluto 2 • 1986 Pluto & Charon radii, albedos, colors • 1987 Pluto density is 2 g/cm3 • 1988 Pluto orbit chaotic; atmosphere, polar caps • 1989 Pluto & Triton similar, structure in atmosphere • 1992 Nitrogen and CO ice, density disparity • 1992 Discovery of the Kuiper Belt • 2001 Binary Kuiper Belt objects (KBOs) • 2005 Two more moons discovered! P1 and P2. Early Hubble observations of Pluto and Charon Discovery of two new moons of Pluto New satellite discovery observations • Hubble proposal designed by Weaver, Stern, et al., initially rejected, then accepted when STIS died • Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) Wide Field Channel (WFC) covers entire orbital stability zone • Pluto-Charon near chip gap: peek-a-boo! • 4 long exposures on May Press release image for new moons: the 15 and May 18, 2005, using only 2 orbits discovery was surprisingly easy for Hubble with • Hal’s request, June 13… ACS… but not quite as easy as it looks here. 3 Calibrating and drizzling ACS images Hubble Servicing Mission 3B Advanced Camera for Surveys The Whirlpool Galaxy M51 15 May 2005, frame 1 15 May 2005, frame 2 15 May 2005, frame 3 4 15 May 2005, frame 4 15 May 2005, sum 4 frames 15 May 2005, median 4 frames 18 May 2005, frame 1 18 May 2005, frame 2 18 May 2005, frame 3 5 18 May 2005, frame 4 18 May 2005, sum 4 frames 18 May 2005, median 4 frames 15 May 2005, median 4 frames Finding needles in the haystack… S/2005 P 1 Charon S/2005 P 2 15 and 18 May 2005, sum 8 frames 15 and 18 May 2005, median 8 frames 6 Initial thoughts • Too easy ?!? Well-designed program • Surprised they are so close to Pluto: expecting moons much farther out • Surprised there were two – one would have been amazing enough, odds small for even one object • Two objects help “confirm” each other, help validate assumptions? Confirmation and follow-up The “checklist” of possible explanations • Independent discovery in Aug 2005 by Andrew Steffl • Search other existing data: Hubble, Subaru… • Hubble follow-up: impossible until Feb 2006 (2 gyros) • Ground-based attempts to image the new moons in Sep/Oct: Keck, VLT, Gemini (difficult until spring 2006) • Artifacts from the detector or optics: hot • Checklist of alternate explanations: rule them out? pixels, optical ghosts, scattered light, etc • Confident enough to announce on 31 October 2005 • Real foreground/background objects: asteroids? binary KBO? Plutinos? • New moons of Pluto! Preliminary assumptions Pre-discovery observations in 2002 and conclusions • Hubble program by Buie & Young • Orbits are co-planar with Charon, nearly circular, • ACS High Resolution Channel possibly in stable resonances with each other • Primarily designed to map • Probably formed primordially with Charon surface features of Pluto and (collision), not later (captured) Charon • New moons marginally • No other moons of similar magnitude (unless detected artifacts hid them in June; we’d find them in Feb • Further observations will 2006); very compact system definitively determine orbits, and hopefully confirm these • Pluto first KBO with multiple satellites: implies detections: are the satellites there are probably many more where they should be? 7 The “quadruple planet” Pluto Relative sizes of Pluto, Charon, and the two new moons (P1 and P2) Visual Diameter Orbital Orbital magnitude radius * period * (barycentric) Pluto 14.2 2328 km 6.387 days +/- 42 km Charon 16.2 1208 km 6.387 days P1 +/- 4 km P2 S/2005 P 1 22.93 61-167 km 64,700 km 38.2 days P2 +/- 0.12 (3.7x Charon) (~6x Charon) 2300 km 1200 km ~100 km S/2005 P 2 23.38 46-137 km 49,400 km 25.5 days +/- 0.17 (2.8x Charon) (~4x Charon) New moons are 5000x fainter, 12x smaller, and 3-4x farther out than Charon, with possible 6:4:1 orbital resonances What does a “quadruple planet” look like? Announcement and publications Weaver et al, 2005, IAU Circular 8625 Weaver et al., 2006, Nature (accepted) Stern et al., 2006, Nature (accepted) Steffl et al., Astronomical Journal (submitted) Pre-prints available online at: http://arxiv.org/archive/astro-ph “Xena & Gabrielle” Xena The 10th planet? Pluto Moon Earth 8 Should we call Pluto a planet? • I’m neutral. But some things to consider… • Is Pluto the first of many Kuiper Belt “ice dwarf” planets discovered? • Is larger Xena the 10th planet? • Are slightly smaller Sedna, Quaoar planets? • Ceres was called a planet for ~50 years, then “demoted” to asteroid (a precedent) • Will we have only 8 planets, or hundreds of them? • Is this a problem? Seems like progress to me. • The IAU is working on it…in the meanwhile, it is a harmless and healthy “non-controversy” Voyagers http://pluto.jhuapl.edu Launched in 1977 Good luck to New Horizons, the next great Voyage of Discovery… It’s greatest discoveries will surely be the unexpected ones. It will surely inspire the next generation of math and science students… 13 17 00 00 Launch currently set for: January 17, 2006 2:11 PM EST Pluto: A Little Background Distant Pluto was discovered in 1930, by Clyde Tombaugh at Lowell Hal Weaver Observatory, Arizona. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab and New Horizons Project Scientist Until the 1990s, Pluto seemed to be a misfit 9 An Historic Journey Large KBOs Abound The Initial Reconnaissance of The Solar System’s Icy Dwarf Planets, or Planetary Embryos “Third Zone” KBOs Pluto-Charon Jupiter System 2016-2020 July 2015 March 2007 Launch Jan 2006 The Kuiper Belt Was Unknown Before the 1990s Pluto-Charon: What we know Pluto Continues to Surprise Us Two New Moons Discovered The Best Hubble Images of Pluto Are Still Crude Toward New Horizons New Horizons Launch Vehicle The Highest Priority New Frontiers New Start Recommendation of the Planetary Decadal Survey Centaur Forward 5-meter Short Payload Load Reactor Fairing (68 ft) Payload Centaur Interstage Adapter (PLA) A Reconnaissance Expedition Adapter (12.5 ft Dia) To the Kuiper Belt & Pluto-Charon Centaur Conical Interstage Adapter CCB Cylindrical Interstage Adapter Solid Rocket Boosters Centaur Upper Aft Transition Centaur Single Stage Skirt/Heat Shield Aft Stub RL10 Engine Adapter 5-Meter RD-180 Engine Common Core Payload Fairing BoosterTM (CCB) Boattail 10 New Horizons to the Pad New Horizons Launch Site Baseline Mission Design New Horizons Science Team Pluto arrival year 2021 Launch Period: Jan 11 - Feb 14, 2006 (35 days) 2d 2020 4 d 2019 6 d 2018 2d 2017 3 d 2016 18 d 2015 2014 Pluto-direct 2013 JGA 2012 2/1 2/2 2/3 2/4 2/5 2/6 2/7 2/8 2/9 1/11 1/12 1/13 1/14 1/15 1/16 1/17 1/18 1/19 1/20 1/21 1/22 1/23 1/24 1/25 1/26 1/27 1/28 1/29 1/30 1/31 2/10 2/11 2/12 2/13 2/14 Launch date (2006) 2007 launch : 14 days; All arrivals 2019-2021 Pluto-Charon Encounter Two Hour Daily Launch Window Pluto-Charon Encounter Geometry – Arrival July 14, 2015 Launch Window Opens Launch Time (EST) Charon-Earth Occultation Pluto-Earth Occultation 14:17:50 17:30 12:49:50 16:30 Charon 13:40 15:30 14:30 Pluto 12:40 Sun 13:30 Earth Charon-Sun Occultation 0.24° 12:30 14:15:41 11:30 Pluto-Sun Occultation 11:40 12:49:00 Charon C/A 10:30 • S/C trajectory time ticks: 10 min 12:12:52 • Charon orbit time ticks: 12 hr 26,937 km • Occultation: center time Pluto C/A 13.87 km/s 2/2/06 2/4/06 2/6/06 2/8/06 • Position and lighting at Pluto C/A 11:59:00 1/11/06 1/13/06 1/15/06 1/17/06 1/19/06 1/21/06 1/23/06 1/25/06 1/27/06 1/29/06 1/31/06 2/10/06 2/12/06 2/14/06 • Distance relative to body center 11,095 km Launch Date 13.77 km/s 11 Encounter Highlights New Horizons “Firsts” ¾ Over six months of encounter science at Pluto ¾ First mission to Pluto.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planetary Research Center Lowell Observatory Flagstaff, Arizona 86002
    N 8 4 - °1* R 7 <• PLANETARY RESEARCH CENTER LOWELL OBSERVATORY FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA 86002 NASA GRANT NSG-7530 POST-MISSION VIKING DATA ANALYSIS FINAL REPORT ; SUBMITTED: 26 APRIL M-A,- BAUM-- ' KARI_LUMME .__ PRINCIPAL-INVESTIGATOR< -? CO-^INVESTIGATOR J, .WTIN -• LAWRENCE H, WASSERMAN CO-INVESTIGATOR CO-INVESTIGATOR Page 2 PERSONNEL—" Averaged over the time interval (3.7 years) that funds were expended under this grant, the following staff devoted the indicated percentages of their time to it: W. A. Baum, Principal Investigator, 18$ time L. J. Martin, Co-Investigator, 52% K. Lumme, Co-Investigator, 19% L. H. Wasserman, Co-Investigator, S% T. J. Kreidl, Computer Programmer, 5% Others (combined), ResearctuAssistants, 7-$ • ~ -> "Others" include H. S. Horstman, M. L. Kantz, and S. E. Jones. In addition, there are several Observatory employees paid through overhead who provide services such as library, bookkeeping, and maintenance. BACKGROUND Work under this grant was a continuation of our participation in the Viking Mission. That participation commenced in 1970 with Baum's membership on the Viking Orbiter Imaging Team and continued through the end of team operations in 1978. This grant then commenced in 1979 at the start of the Mars Data Analysis Program (MDAP). MDAP was planned by NASA as a 5-year program, and our initial MDAP proposal was scaled to that expectation and to a funding level consistent with the Mars research projects in which we were already engaged. As it turned out, there were subsequent reductions in MDAP funds, and we (like many of our colleagues at other institutions) had to adjust the scope of our Mars research projects accordingly.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Report Report
    The PLANETARYPLANETARY REPORT REPORT Volume XXI Number 2 March/April 2001 Farewell, Mir Inside— The Planetary Society’s Cosmos 1: The First Solar Sail On the Cover: Volume XXI When Mir launched in February 1986, it was a show- Table of Number 2 case of Russian technology. But after 15 years of hard work, the aged space station has ended its run. Contents March/April 2001 This view of Mir over Earth’s blue skies was imaged during a fly-around by the space shuttle Atlantis follow- ing the joint docking activities between the two crews. Image: JSC/NASA Features Farewell to a Cold Warrior: Mir Station Obituary 4 As head of the Space Research Institute of the Soviet Academy of Sciences, Roald Sagdeev was there at the birth of the Mir space station. As an adviser to Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, he watched Mir’s changing role in international space policy. Then, after marrying From Susan Eisenhower, the American president’s granddaughter, he moved to the United States The and saw Mir from a different perspective. A member of The Planetary Society’s Board of Editor Directors, he shares with Society members his memories of the long-lived space station. 8 A Bold New Voyage: he Planetary Society is preparing to The Planetary Society Prepares to Fly a Solar Sail It’s the first time a membership organization has undertaken an actual space mission, and launch its first space mission: the T only The Planetary Society is audacious enough to do it. This is the story of how we plan to Cosmos 1 solar sail.
    [Show full text]
  • Lowell Observatory Communications Office 1400 W. Mars Hill Rd
    Lowell Observatory Communications Office 1400 W. Mars Hill Rd. Flagstaff, AZ 86001 www.lowell.edu PRESS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE MAY 12, 2015 ***Contact details appear below*** Image attached LOWELL OBSERVATORY TO HOST PLUTO AND BEYOND GALA ON JUNE 13 Flagstaff, Az- Lowell Observatory will host its fourth annual fundraising gala, Pluto and Beyond, on June 13. Sponsored by APS, it will take place on the campus of Northern Arizona University in Flagstaff and feature experts sharing the latest Pluto news, auctions showcasing a variety of travel packages and astronomy-themed collectibles, and live music. Proceeds support Lowell’s mission of astronomical research and outreach. Lisa Actor, Lowell’s Deputy Director for Development, said, “This will be an exciting event in this year when we’re celebrating the 85th anniversary of the discovery of Pluto at Lowell Observatory! I’m anxious to meet and personally thank the many Flagstaff area supporters of the observatory.” Pluto and Beyond kicks off with the Kuiper VIP Reception at 5:30 p.m. Presented by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona, this champagne and cocktail gathering will meet in the 1899 Bar & Grill. The main event happens in the High Country Conference Center, with doors opening at 6 p.m. and a sit-down dinner served at 7:30 p.m. Afterward, experts from Lowell Observatory will discuss the astronomy news story of the year—the New Horizons spacecraft’s July approach to Pluto after an incredible nine-year journey. This program will start with a look at Clyde Tombaugh’s improbable discovery of this icy world at Lowell in 1930 and continue with the latest news from New Horizons as it prepares to capture the first-ever close-up images of Pluto’s surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Pluto's Long, Strange History — in Pictures : Nature News & Comment
    Pluto's long, strange history — in pictures Nature marks the 85th anniversary of the dwarf planet's discovery. Alexandra Witze 18 February 2015 Even at a distance of 5 billion kilometres, Pluto has entranced scientists and the public back on Earth. Nature looks at the history of this enigmatic world, which in July will get its first close-up visit by a spacecraft. First glimpse Lowell Observatory 18 February 1930: Farmer-turned-astronomer Clyde Tombaugh (pictured), aged 24, discovers Pluto while comparing photographic plates of the night sky at Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, Arizona. The discovery, announced on 13 March 1930, is the culmination of observatory founder Percival Lowell’s obsessive quest to find a ‘Planet X’, the existence of which was suspected based on perturbations in Neptune’s orbit. Name game Galaxy Picture Library 1 May 1930: The Lowell Observatory announces that its favoured name for the discovery is Pluto, suggested by 11-year-old Venetia Burney (pictured) from Oxford, UK, after the Roman god of the underworld. Venetia later becomes the namesake of a student-built dust counter on NASA's New Horizons spacecraft, which is currently on its way to Pluto. Pair bond US Naval Observatory 22 June 1978: James Christy and Robert Harrington, of the US Naval Observatory's Flagstaff Station, discover Pluto’s largest moon, Charon. It is visible as a bulge (at top in left image) that regularly appears and disappears in observational images as the two bodies orbit their mutual centre of gravity1. The moon is so large relative to Pluto that the two are sometimes referred to as a binary planet.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Composition of Pluto's Aerosols Analogues
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 13, EPSC-DPS2019-941-1, 2019 EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC Attribution 4.0 license. Chemical composition of Pluto’s aerosols analogues Lora Jovanovic (1), Thomas Gautier (1), Nathalie Carrasco (1), Véronique Vuitton (2), Cédric Wolters (2), François-Régis Orthous-Daunay (2), Ludovic Vettier (1), Laurène Flandinet (2) ([email protected]) (1) Laboratoire Atmosphères, Milieux, Observations Spatiales (LATMOS), Guyancourt, France (2) Institut de Planétologie et d’Astrophysique de Grenoble (IPAG), Grenoble, France Abstract Table 1: Types of Pluto’s aerosols analogues produced with the PAMPRE experiment. The discovery of haze in Pluto’s atmosphere on July 14th, 2015, has raised lots of questions. To help Corresponding understand the data provided by the New Horizons Composition of the gas mixture altitude on spacecraft, Pluto’s aerosols analogues were Pluto [2] synthetized and their chemical composition was 99% N2 : 1% CH4 : 500 ppm CO 400 km determined by high-resolution mass spectrometry 95% N2 : 5% CH4 : 500 ppm CO 600 km (Orbitrap technique). 2.2. High-resolution mass spectrometry 1. Introduction (HRMS) study On July 14th, 2015, when Pluto was flown by the New Horizons spacecraft, aerosols were detected in its We analyzed the soluble fraction of Pluto’s aerosols atmosphere, mainly composed of molecular nitrogen analogues, dissolved in a 50:50 (v/v)% methanol:acetonitrile mixture. The analytical N2, methane CH4, with around 500 ppm of carbon monoxide CO [1,2,3]. These aerosols aggregate into instrument used was the LTQ Orbitrap XL several thin haze layers that extend at more than (ThermoFisher Scientific).
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2001.00125V1 [Astro-Ph.EP] 1 Jan 2020
    Draft version January 3, 2020 Typeset using LATEX default style in AASTeX61 SIZE AND SHAPE CONSTRAINTS OF (486958) ARROKOTH FROM STELLAR OCCULTATIONS Marc W. Buie,1 Simon B. Porter,1 et al. 1Southwest Research Institute 1050 Walnut St., Suite 300, Boulder, CO 80302 USA To be submitted to Astronomical Journal, Version 1.1, 2019/12/30 ABSTRACT We present the results from four stellar occultations by (486958) Arrokoth, the flyby target of the New Horizons extended mission. Three of the four efforts led to positive detections of the body, and all constrained the presence of rings and other debris, finding none. Twenty-five mobile stations were deployed for 2017 June 3 and augmented by fixed telescopes. There were no positive detections from this effort. The event on 2017 July 10 was observed by SOFIA with one very short chord. Twenty-four deployed stations on 2017 July 17 resulted in five chords that clearly showed a complicated shape consistent with a contact binary with rough dimensions of 20 by 30 km for the overall outline. A visible albedo of 10% was derived from these data. Twenty-two systems were deployed for the fourth event on 2018 Aug 4 and resulted in two chords. The combination of the occultation data and the flyby results provides a significant refinement of the rotation period, now estimated to be 15.9380 ± 0.0005 hours. The occultation data also provided high-precision astrometric constraints on the position of the object that were crucial for supporting the navigation for the New Horizons flyby. This work demonstrates an effective method for obtaining detailed size and shape information and probing for rings and dust on distant Kuiper Belt objects as well as being an important source of positional data that can aid in spacecraft navigation that is particularly useful for small and distant bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy Educator Profiles
    Astronomy Educator Profiles Alexis Ann Acohido graduated of the University of Hawaii at Manoa in 2015, where she obtained her Bachelor’s of Science in mathematics. Born and raised on Oahu, she moved to Hawai‘i island last year and is currently part of the Public Information and Outreach department at Gemini Observatory in Hilo, Hawai‘i. In 2013, she was part of the Akamai Workforce Initiative and interned at the Institute for Astronomy on Maui where she worked on parallax ranging methods for point source objects. Alexis Ann Acohido Gemini Observatory Contact: [email protected] Christian Andersen is the Operations Manager at the Pacific International Space Center for Exploration Systems (PISCES), and leads the agency’s additive manufacturing & construction projects at its Laser Lava Lab. Andersen started his career conducting research in inertial confinement fusion at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Ecole Polytechnique, and Rutherford Appleton Laboratories. As Operations Manager, he’s worked on a variety of PISCES projects in transitioning aerospace technologies to terrestrial applications and analogue field testing. Andersen is also a Lecturer and Affiliate Faculty in the Physics & Astronomy Department at the University of Hawaii at Hilo, and the Vice- Chair of the Space Resources Technical Committee for the AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics). He holds a B.S. in Physics from San Jose State University and a M.S. in Engineering from Christian Andersen U.C. Davis. PISCES Contact: [email protected] Virginia Aragon-Barnes had a passion for science and a natural curiosity about how and why things worked from a very early age.
    [Show full text]
  • + New Horizons
    Media Contacts NASA Headquarters Policy/Program Management Dwayne Brown New Horizons Nuclear Safety (202) 358-1726 [email protected] The Johns Hopkins University Mission Management Applied Physics Laboratory Spacecraft Operations Michael Buckley (240) 228-7536 or (443) 778-7536 [email protected] Southwest Research Institute Principal Investigator Institution Maria Martinez (210) 522-3305 [email protected] NASA Kennedy Space Center Launch Operations George Diller (321) 867-2468 [email protected] Lockheed Martin Space Systems Launch Vehicle Julie Andrews (321) 853-1567 [email protected] International Launch Services Launch Vehicle Fran Slimmer (571) 633-7462 [email protected] NEW HORIZONS Table of Contents Media Services Information ................................................................................................ 2 Quick Facts .............................................................................................................................. 3 Pluto at a Glance ...................................................................................................................... 5 Why Pluto and the Kuiper Belt? The Science of New Horizons ............................... 7 NASA’s New Frontiers Program ........................................................................................14 The Spacecraft ........................................................................................................................15 Science Payload ...............................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Atmosphere of Pluto As Observed by New Horizons G
    The Atmosphere of Pluto as Observed by New Horizons G. Randall Gladstone,1,2* S. Alan Stern,3 Kimberly Ennico,4 Catherine B. Olkin,3 Harold A. Weaver,5 Leslie A. Young,3 Michael E. Summers,6 Darrell F. Strobel,7 David P. Hinson,8 Joshua A. Kammer,3 Alex H. Parker,3 Andrew J. Steffl,3 Ivan R. Linscott,9 Joel Wm. Parker,3 Andrew F. Cheng,5 David C. Slater,1† Maarten H. Versteeg,1 Thomas K. Greathouse,1 Kurt D. Retherford,1,2 Henry Throop,7 Nathaniel J. Cunningham,10 William W. Woods,9 Kelsi N. Singer,3 Constantine C. C. Tsang,3 Rebecca Schindhelm,3 Carey M. Lisse,5 Michael L. Wong,11 Yuk L. Yung,11 Xun Zhu,5 Werner Curdt,12 Panayotis Lavvas,13 Eliot F. Young,3 G. Leonard Tyler,9 and the New Horizons Science Team 1Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78238, USA 2University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA 3Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO 80302, USA 4National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Center, Space Science Division, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 5The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723, USA 6George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA 7The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 8Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence Institute, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA 9Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 10Nebraska Wesleyan University, Lincoln, NE 68504 11California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 12Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, 37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany 13Groupe de Spectroscopie Moléculaire et Atmosphérique, Université Reims Champagne-Ardenne, 51687 Reims, France *To whom correspondence should be addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018: Aiaa-Space-Report
    AIAA TEAM SPACE TRANSPORTATION DESIGN COMPETITION TEAM PERSEPHONE Submitted By: Chelsea Dalton Ashley Miller Ryan Decker Sahil Pathan Layne Droppers Joshua Prentice Zach Harmon Andrew Townsend Nicholas Malone Nicholas Wijaya Iowa State University Department of Aerospace Engineering May 10, 2018 TEAM PERSEPHONE Page I Iowa State University: Persephone Design Team Chelsea Dalton Ryan Decker Layne Droppers Zachary Harmon Trajectory & Propulsion Communications & Power Team Lead Thermal Systems AIAA ID #908154 AIAA ID #906791 AIAA ID #532184 AIAA ID #921129 Nicholas Malone Ashley Miller Sahil Pathan Joshua Prentice Orbit Design Science Science Science AIAA ID #921128 AIAA ID #922108 AIAA ID #761247 AIAA ID #922104 Andrew Townsend Nicholas Wijaya Structures & CAD Trajectory & Propulsion AIAA ID #820259 AIAA ID #644893 TEAM PERSEPHONE Page II Contents 1 Introduction & Problem Background2 1.1 Motivation & Background......................................2 1.2 Mission Definition..........................................3 2 Mission Overview 5 2.1 Trade Study Tools..........................................5 2.2 Mission Architecture.........................................6 2.3 Planetary Protection.........................................6 3 Science 8 3.1 Observations of Interest.......................................8 3.2 Goals.................................................9 3.3 Instrumentation............................................ 10 3.3.1 Visible and Infrared Imaging|Ralph............................ 11 3.3.2 Radio Science Subsystem.................................
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Color of Pluto? - Universe Today
    What is the Color of Pluto? - Universe Today space and astronomy news Universe Today Home Members Guide to Space Carnival Photos Videos Forum Contact Privacy Login NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft captured this high-resolution enhanced color view of http://www.universetoday.com/13866/color-of-pluto/[29-Mar-17 13:18:37] What is the Color of Pluto? - Universe Today Pluto on July 14, 2015. Credit: NASA/JHUAPL/SwRI WHAT IS THE COLOR OF PLUTO? Article Updated: 28 Mar , 2017 by Matt Williams When Pluto was first discovered by Clybe Tombaugh in 1930, astronomers believed that they had found the ninth and outermost planet of the Solar System. In the decades that followed, what little we were able to learn about this distant world was the product of surveys conducted using Earth-based telescopes. Throughout this period, astronomers believed that Pluto was a dirty brown color. In recent years, thanks to improved observations and the New Horizons mission, we have finally managed to obtain a clear picture of what Pluto looks like. In addition to information about its surface features, composition and tenuous atmosphere, much has been learned about Pluto’s appearance. Because of this, we now know that the one-time “ninth planet” of the Solar System is rich and varied in color. Composition: With a mean density of 1.87 g/cm3, Pluto’s composition is differentiated between an icy mantle and a rocky core. The surface is composed of more than 98% nitrogen ice, with traces of methane and carbon monoxide. Scientists also suspect that Pluto’s internal structure is differentiated, with the rocky material having settled into a dense core surrounded by a mantle of water ice.
    [Show full text]
  • TENURE-TRACK Or TENURED ASTRONOMER Lowell Observatory
    TENURE-TRACK or TENURED ASTRONOMER Lowell Observatory invites applications for one or more tenure-track or tenured research positions in astronomy or planetary science. We invite applicants at any career level who can build on current strengths or open new areas for Lowell. A Ph.D. in astronomy, planetary science, or a related field is required, as is an outstanding record of research and demonstrated ability or potential to obtain external research funding. Candidates are invited to describe how they would make use of our observational facilities, but we will give equal consideration to all research areas. The start date for this position is flexible but desired by Fall 2016. Lowell Observatory is an independent, non-profit research institution. Our astronomers have access to our new 4.3-meter Discovery Channel Telescope, operated in partnership with Boston University, the University of Toledo, the University of Maryland/GSFC, Northern Arizona University, Yale University, and Discovery Communications. Lowell also maintains 1.8-m, 1.1-m, and 0.9-m telescopes equipped with optical and IR imagers and spectrographs. We partner with the US Naval Observatory and the Naval Research Laboratory in the Navy Precision Optical Interferometer. Lowell offers numerous opportunities for involvement in education and outreach as well. To apply: Send applications electronically to [email protected]. Applications should include (1) a cover letter and CV, (2) a research plan of 3 pages or less, and (3) names and mail/email addresses of three individuals who have agreed to serve as references. Do not ask for reference letters to be sent in advance.
    [Show full text]