OFFICIAL RECORD of PROCEEDINGS Thursday, 1 March
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 1 March 2012 6665 OFFICIAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Thursday, 1 March 2012 The Council continued to meet at Nine o'clock MEMBERS PRESENT: THE PRESIDENT THE HONOURABLE JASPER TSANG YOK-SING, G.B.S., J.P. IR DR THE HONOURABLE RAYMOND HO CHUNG-TAI, S.B.S., S.B.ST.J., J.P. THE HONOURABLE LEE CHEUK-YAN DR THE HONOURABLE DAVID LI KWOK-PO, G.B.M., G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE FRED LI WAH-MING, S.B.S., J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE MARGARET NG THE HONOURABLE JAMES TO KUN-SUN THE HONOURABLE CHEUNG MAN-KWONG THE HONOURABLE CHAN KAM-LAM, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE MRS SOPHIE LEUNG LAU YAU-FUN, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE LEUNG YIU-CHUNG DR THE HONOURABLE PHILIP WONG YU-HONG, G.B.S. THE HONOURABLE WONG YUNG-KAN, S.B.S., J.P. 6666 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 1 March 2012 THE HONOURABLE LAU KONG-WAH, J.P. THE HONOURABLE LAU WONG-FAT, G.B.M., G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE MIRIAM LAU KIN-YEE, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE EMILY LAU WAI-HING, J.P. THE HONOURABLE ANDREW CHENG KAR-FOO THE HONOURABLE TAM YIU-CHUNG, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ABRAHAM SHEK LAI-HIM, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE LI FUNG-YING, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE AUDREY EU YUET-MEE, S.C., J.P. THE HONOURABLE VINCENT FANG KANG, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE WONG KWOK-HING, M.H. THE HONOURABLE LEE WING-TAT DR THE HONOURABLE JOSEPH LEE KOK-LONG, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE JEFFREY LAM KIN-FUNG, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE ANDREW LEUNG KWAN-YUEN, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHEUNG HOK-MING, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE WONG TING-KWONG, B.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE RONNY TONG KA-WAH, S.C. THE HONOURABLE CHIM PUI-CHUNG PROF THE HONOURABLE PATRICK LAU SAU-SHING, S.B.S., J.P. LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 1 March 2012 6667 THE HONOURABLE KAM NAI-WAI, M.H. THE HONOURABLE CYD HO SAU-LAN THE HONOURABLE STARRY LEE WAI-KING, J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE LAM TAI-FAI, B.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHAN HAK-KAN THE HONOURABLE PAUL CHAN MO-PO, M.H., J.P. THE HONOURABLE CHAN KIN-POR, J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE PRISCILLA LEUNG MEI-FUN, J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE LEUNG KA-LAU THE HONOURABLE CHEUNG KWOK-CHE THE HONOURABLE WONG SING-CHI THE HONOURABLE WONG KWOK-KIN, B.B.S. THE HONOURABLE IP WAI-MING, M.H. THE HONOURABLE IP KWOK-HIM, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE MRS REGINA IP LAU SUK-YEE, G.B.S., J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE PAN PEY-CHYOU THE HONOURABLE PAUL TSE WAI-CHUN, J.P. DR THE HONOURABLE SAMSON TAM WAI-HO, J.P. THE HONOURABLE ALAN LEONG KAH-KIT, S.C. THE HONOURABLE LEUNG KWOK-HUNG THE HONOURABLE TANYA CHAN 6668 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 1 March 2012 THE HONOURABLE ALBERT CHAN WAI-YIP THE HONOURABLE WONG YUK-MAN MEMBERS ABSENT: THE HONOURABLE ALBERT HO CHUN-YAN THE HONOURABLE TIMOTHY FOK TSUN-TING, G.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE TOMMY CHEUNG YU-YAN, S.B.S., J.P. THE HONOURABLE FREDERICK FUNG KIN-KEE, S.B.S., J.P. PUBLIC OFFICERS ATTENDING: THE HONOURABLE WONG YAN-LUNG, S.C., J.P. THE SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE THE HONOURABLE MRS CARRIE LAM CHENG YUET-NGOR, G.B.S., J.P. SECRETARY FOR DEVELOPMENT THE HONOURABLE RAYMOND TAM CHI-YUEN, J.P. SECRETARY FOR CONSTITUTIONAL AND MAINLAND AFFAIRS MISS ADELINE WONG CHING-MAN, J.P. UNDER SECRETARY FOR CONSTITUTIONAL AND MAINLAND AFFAIRS CLERKS IN ATTENDANCE: MRS JUSTINA LAM CHENG BO-LING, ASSISTANT SECRETARY GENERAL MRS PERCY MA, ASSISTANT SECRETARY GENERAL LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 1 March 2012 6669 MEMBERS' MOTIONS PRESIDENT (in Cantonese): Good morning, Council will now resume. Fourth Members' motion: Motion for the adjournment of the Council under Rule 16(2) of the Rules of Procedure. PRESIDENT (in Cantonese): Ms Cyd HO has proposed a motion for adjournment under Rule 16(2) of the Rules of Procedure for the purpose of debating the following issue: the integrity and probity of the Chief Executive and his responsibility for upholding the fairness and impartiality of the next Chief Executive Election to be held on 25 March. The mover of motion and other Members may each speak for up to 15 minutes. Members who wish to speak will please press the "Request to speak" button. I now call upon Ms Cyd HO to speak and move the motion. MOTION FOR THE ADJOURNMENT OF THE COUNCIL UNDER RULE 16(2) OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE MS CYD HO (in Cantonese): I move that this Council do now adjourn for the purpose of debating the integrity and probity of the Chief Executive and his responsibility for upholding the fairness and impartiality of the next Chief Executive Election to be held on 25 March. President, actually, the election to be held on 25 March is unfair from beginning to end. It is a small-circle election, in which only 1 200 people can vote. As the other 7.07 million people are excluded, how can it be fair? However, the Chief Executive is to be held accountable because he rolled out a retrogressive constitutional reform package in 2010. Therefore, he has broken his election pledge on this count. 6670 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 1 March 2012 President, the outcome really relies on the god's words whispered in one's ear. If one will only vote according to the voice one hears, how can this be called an election? However, with such a fierce battle vying for the post going on, at least we demand the Chief Executive to remain neutral and avoid showing favouritism towards either side in dealing with the two scandal-plagued candidates in order to maintain his impartiality. However, in such a sensitive moment, in such a fierce moment, the close association of the Chief Executive with an active supporter of one camp has been exposed. They are on such close terms that the Chief Executive can stay overnight on the tycoon's private yacht. Moreover, the yacht-stay in Macao revealed by the media is not a one-off incident. The Chief Executive has himself disclosed a three-night stay on a friend's yacht in Thailand. However, what is the identity of this friend? Will he get any benefits in business through his association with the Chief Executive? This has remained unknown so far. Moreover, the luxury apartment in Shenzhen where the Chief Executive has planned to live after retirement from office is, of course, another concern. According to the Chief Executive, he has paid an annual rental of $1 million for this luxury apartment of 6 000 sq ft. Mr WONG Cho-bau, a large shareholder of the group that owns this property, also has a major stake in the Digital Broadcasting Corporation (DBC). Upon the grant of the licence by the Chief Executive and the Executive Council, why can the Chief Executive completely shirk the responsibility by simply saying "he was careless"? In the past, when other civil servants were charged by the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC), could they also completely shirk the responsibility by simply saying "they were careless"? It is also reported that a D6 officer was reprimanded for the acceptance of a ferry ticket bought for him upon the insistence of the Macao Government for his return journey to Hong Kong. To these civil servants, how can their feeling bear such a blow? However, surprisingly, our Chief Executive has taken everything, big or small. Apart from a luxury apartment of 6 000 sq ft, and a flight on a private jet at the cost of economy class fare, a treadmill is also involved. Actually, a person with common sense ― a normal, reasonable person with general knowledge will never consider such behaviour of the Chief Executive as clean and impartial. However, recent reports have shown us that there is no most rotten but more and more rotten. LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ─ 1 March 2012 6671 As to the question of whether the Chief Executive has practised favouritism out of his personal interests in handling breaches of the candidates and the licensing of the DBC, there are many question marks in the minds of the public. The public may also ask: As the Chief Executive and the supporter of the TANG camp stayed on the same yacht for such a long time, would someone have asked him explicitly or implicitly to relax a bit here and tighten up a bit there? Therefore, at this sensitive moment, the Chief Executive absolutely should not mix with either of the two camps to give people a chance to query whether he has practised favouritism towards either side. Of course, the Chief Executive may say that he has known members of the three camps for a long time, so it is impossible for him not to meet them. It is true that one has to make sacrifices when one holds public office. As he has the highest authority in the SAR and the full responsibility for governing Hong Kong, it must have an impact on his private life. The same also applies to Members and civil servants. So, why should the Chief Executive be an exception? While the Chief Executive says that it is impossible for him not to meet these private friends of his, we can see that he totally evades communication with Members despite it is one of his official duties.