Kevin Barron 1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
HC 676 Kevin Barron 1 Written evidence received by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards relating to Kevin Barron Written evidence received by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards 2 1. Self-referral letter from Rt Hon Sir Kevin Barron MP to the Commissioner, (undated) received 9 March 2016 2 2. Letter from the Commissioner to Rt Hon Sir Kevin Barron MP, 21 March 2016 4 3. Letter from Rt Hon Sir Kevin Barron MP to the Commissioner, 5 April 2016 6 4. Appendices to letter of 5 April 2016 7 5. Letter from the Commissioner to Rt Hon Sir Kevin Barron MP, 20 April 2016 28 6. Letter from the Commissioner to Rt Hon Sir Kevin Barron MP, 12 May 2016 29 7. Email from Sir Kevin’s office, 9 June 2016 29 8. Letter from the Commissioner to the Registrar of Members’ Financial Interests, 15 June 2016 32 9. Note of telephone call between the Chairman and the Co-ordinator of JPG with the Commissioner, 15 June 2016 33 10. Email from the Co-ordinator, JPG, to the Commissioner’s Office, 17 June 2016 33 11. Letter from the Registrar to the Commissioner, 29 June 2016 34 12. Letter from the Commissioner to Rt Hon Sir Kevin Barron MP, 30 June 2016 44 13. The Banqueting Regulations, February 2011 44 14. Letter from Rt Hon Sir Kevin Barron MP to the Commissioner, 24 August 2016 51 15. Letter from the Commissioner to Rt Hon Sir Kevin Barron MP, 30 August 2016 51 16. Interview with Sir Kevin Barron, 9 June 2016 54 HC 676 Kevin Barron 2 Written evidence received by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards 1. Self-referral letter from Rt Hon Sir Kevin Barron MP to the Commissioner, (undated) received 9 March 2016 You may be aware of an article published in the Daily Telegraph today entitled “MPs Standards Chief in breach of Rules” this refers to a position I held as a Parliamentary advisor to the Japanese Pharmaceutical Group. The article centres on the use of catering facilities in the house for one breakfast meeting and two dinners, where members of the group and Members of Parliament met to discuss the pharmaceutical industry in the UK. These three meetings were just a small proportion of the meetings I attended in this role but the only ones hosted in Parliament. The relationship I had as an advisor was for twenty hours a year and the agreement was that a direct payment would be made by the JPG to the [charity] in my constituency. My own understanding is that due to the fact that I made no personal gain and all the fees were paid to a charity, I had not breached the rules on usage of parliamentary facilities for personal or business use. It is a matter of record that I followed the rules in registering this interest and that I deposited an agreement for the provision of services, as the rules required. In light of the allegations that I may have breached House of Commons code of conduct or rules, I refer myself to you for you to consider whether any breaches of the rules or the code of conduct have taken place. Accompanied with this letter is copies of all correspondence with the JPG during the time in question. You may wish to know I have recused myself from both the Standards & Privileges committee until such time that this matter has been resolved. 9 March 2016 Extracts from the media article Sir Kevin enclosed “Commons watchdog chair Sir Kevin Barron hosted parliamentary events for drugs firm” 9:30pm GMT, 09 March 2016 “The Labour MP who oversees the ethical standards in the Commons agreed a contract with a group of companies that said he would arrange events in Parliament in return for payment - an apparent breach of the rules. Sir Kevin Barron, the chairman of the standards committee, undertook to provide “services”, including sponsoring events in the House of Commons, for the Japanese Pharmaceutical Group in return for thousands of pounds. Since beginning work for the organisation in 2011, Sir Kevin has organised two dinners and a breakfast in Parliament for the pharmaceutical organisation. Parliamentary rules prohibit MPs from using MPs Commons resources to “confer any undue personal or financial benefit on themselves or anyone else”.” “Sir Kevin told the Telegraph that his fees from the organisation had all been paid to charity, and therefore he had not breached the Code of Conduct. But last night, Sir Alistair Graham, the former chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, said that members of the committee needed to be “whiter than white” and even if Sir Kevin has not personally received the money, the arrangement was still a breach of the rules. “It’s incredible that the chairman of the Commons standards committee could get themselves into such a situation, even if he is giving the money to charity.” “Giving the money to charity is not the issue. The issue is that the rules are there to be complied with. He has power of judging whether other people have not met the rules, he can only do that if he is whiter than white in meeting the rules himself”.” HC 676 Kevin Barron 3 “Sir Kevin told the Telegraph that he did not believe had he broken any rules. He said that he had made “absolutely no personal gain” from the arrangement because the company had given the money to charity. The disclosure is likely to fuel calls for the standards committee, which Sir Kevin heads, to reform.” “Sir Kevin has lodged several contracts with the Parliamentary authorities regarding his work for the JPG. One, dated 14th September 2012, sets out that the MP will be paid up to £5,000 per annum. It then described the “services we expect Kevin Barron to provide”. This includes that they should be able to meet Sir Kevin three times a year to “discuss key topics” and that they “may look to hold the occasional event in the House of Commons which he may sponsor/host”. It concludes by saying that the firms do not expect Sir Kevin to engage in “any form of advocacy”. In June 2011, Sir Kevin arranged a breakfast meeting for five people in the House of Commons’ dining room for the Japanese Pharmaceutical Group. Four months later, he arranged a dinner for 10 people in the same place. This was followed by another dinner for 12 people in July 2013. House of Commons rules governing the conditions of hire for functions and events say that “no part of the venue ... may be used for direct or indirect financial or material gain”. Separately, the Commons code of conduct says that “members shall ensure their use of public resources is always in support of their parliamentary duties. It should not confer any undue personal or financial benefit on themselves or anyone else”. Sir Kevin declared his work for the JPS in the commons register of members’ interests. Sir Kevin said that he agreed the “arrangement” with the JPG because of his “long term interest in the pharmaceutical industry”. He said that the JPG had made three directly to a charity in his constituency, totalling £9,000.” Other attachments to Sir Kevin’s letter Sir Kevin enclosed 36 pages of evidence. I reproduce here only those which are not repeated elsewhere in the written evidence. Letter from Sir Kevin Barron to the Registrar, 3 May 2011 I have been asked to act as a parliamentary adviser to the Japanese Pharmaceutical Group, to which I agree. It is a remunerated role, all proceeds going to [name of charity] in my constituency. I enclose a signed agreement by the Group and a copy of the duties expected of me. Enclosure with letter of 3 May 2011: Agreement for provision of services Between Rt Hon Kevin Barron MP And the Japanese Pharmaceutical Group [name] Co-ordinator JPG [address] We pay up to £5,000 per annum The services we expect Kevin Barron to provide are the following: HC 676 Kevin Barron 4 that members meet with him approximately three times a year to discuss key topics. We expect such meetings to be in central London at a mutually convenient time and venue and an agenda to be set, with his input, in advance. In addition we may look to hold the occasional event at the House of Commons which he may sponsor/host. We do not expect Sir Kevin to engage in any form of advocacy as defined in the Resolution of the House of Commons of 6 November 1995. Signed [….] Letter from [name redacted] on behalf of JPG to Sir Kevin, dated 19 May 2011 On behalf of the Japanese Pharmaceutical Group, I am delighted to provide a cheque to the amount of £3,000 toward the [charity].1 I look forward to seeing you at the MP’s breakfast on 8 June at the House of Commons. [Name redacted] 2. Letter from the Commissioner to Rt Hon Sir Kevin Barron MP, 21 March 2016 Thank you for your letter of 9 March 2016. You asked me to consider whether any breach of the code or the rules has occurred in connection with your work for the Japanese Pharmaceutical Group (JPG). I have decided to begin a formal inquiry. In essence, I will investigate the allegation that you agreed, in return for payment to charity, to arrange access to Parliament and/or parliamentarians and that this was contrary to the rules of the House. My decision to begin an inquiry is based on the evidence you sent with your letter of 9 March and the Daily Telegraph article of the same date.