DOCSLIB.ORG

Rössing Desalination Plant

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rössing Desalination Plant Rössing Uranium Limited SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED RÖSSING URANIUM DESALINATION PLANT NEAR SWAKOPMUND, NAMIBIA FINAL SEIA REPORT PROJECT REFERENCE NO: 110914 DATE: JANUARY 2015 PREPARED BY ON BEHALF OF Rössing Uranium Desalination Plant: Final SEIA Report PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT: Social and Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Rössing Uranium Desalination Plant, near Swakopmund, Namibia AUTHORS: Andries van der Merwe (Aurecon) Patrick Killick (Aurecon) Simon Charter (SLR Namibia) Werner Petrick (SLR Namibia) SPECIALISTS: Birds –Mike and Ann Scott (African Conservation Services CC) Heritage – Dr John Kinahan (Quaternary Research Services) Marine ecology – Dr Andrea Pulfrich (Pisces Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd) Noise - Nicolette von Reiche (Airshed Planning Professionals) Socio-economic - Auriol Ashby (Ashby Associates CC) - Dr Jonthan Barnes (Design and Development Services CC)1 Visual – Stephen Stead (Visual Resource Management Africa) Wastewater discharge modelling – Christoph Soltau (WSP Group) Shoreline dynamics - Christoph Soltau (WSP Group) PROPONENT: Rio Tinto Rössing Uranium Limited REPORT STATUS: Final Environmental Impact Report REPORT NUMBER: 9408/110914 STATUS DATE: 27 January 2015 .......................................... .......................................... Patrick Killick Simon Charter Senior Practitioner: Aurecon Environment and Advisory Senior Practitioner: SLR Environmental Consulting .......................................... …………………………… Werner Petrick Andries van der Merwe Director: SLR Environmental Consulting Technical Director: Aurecon Environment and Advisory This report is to be referred to in bibliographies as: Aurecon and SLR. 2014. Social and Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Rössing Uranium Desalination Plant, near Swakopmund, Namibia. Final SEIA Report, Report No. 9408/110914. Note: All significant changes to the SEIA affected between the draft and final versions of the report are denoted by the underlining of text, as used here. 1 Dr Jonathan Barnes sadly passed away during the course of the project. The project team would like to acknowledge his contribution and extend our condolences to his family, friends, and colleagues. Page II Rössing Uranium Desalination Plant: Final SEIA Report TABLE OF CONTENTS NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. I 1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................................. 1 2 LEGAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 The Constitution of the Republic of Namibia (Act 1 of 1990) ................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Environmental Management Act (Act 7 of 2007) ....................................................................................................................... 4 2.2.1 Content of SEIA Report ............................................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Water Resources Management Act (Act 24 of 2004)................................................................................................................. 7 2.4 The National Heritage Act (Act 27 of 2004) ................................................................................................................................ 8 2.5 The Soil Conservation Act (Act 76 of 1969) ............................................................................................................................... 8 2.6 The National Policy on Coastal Management for Namibia (2013)............................................................................................ 8 2.7 The Marine Resources Act (2000) ............................................................................................................................................... 9 2.8 The Aquaculture Act (2002) ......................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.9 The Integrated Coastal Management Bill (2014)...................................................................................................................... 10 2.10 The National Policy on Human-Wildlife Conflict Management (2009) ................................................................................... 10 2.11 Proposed Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan (2009).................................................................................................. 10 2.12 The Namibia Vision 2030 ........................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.13 COASTAL SEAS ......................................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.14 Water Quality Guidelines ........................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.15 Biodiversity Legislation and Policies ....................................................................................................................................... 15 2.15.1 Rio Tinto Environmental and Sustainability Policies ................................................................................................................................. 15 2.15.2 Rössing Uranium Limited Policies ............................................................................................................................................................. 16 2.16 Social Policies ............................................................................................................................................................................ 17 2.16.1 The MET Policy on HIV and AIDS ............................................................................................................................................................ 17 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................. 18 3.1 A background to desalination ................................................................................................................................................... 18 3.2 Project Need and Desirability ................................................................................................................................................... 22 3.3 Project Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................ 23 3.3.1 Pre-construction phase ............................................................................................................................................................................. 23 3.3.2 Construction phase ................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 3.3.3 Operations phase ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 3.3.4 Decommissioning phase ........................................................................................................................................................................... 28 3.4 Project location .......................................................................................................................................................................... 28 3.5 Project Components .................................................................................................................................................................. 30 3.5.1 Seawater intake system ............................................................................................................................................................................ 34 3.5.2 Seawater pre-treatment system ................................................................................................................................................................ 35 3.5.3 Desalination plant ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 3.5.4 Electrical supply system ............................................................................................................................................................................ 39 3.5.5 Product water system and pipeline ........................................................................................................................................................... 40 3.5.6 Effluent treatment and disposal system .................................................................................................................................................... 41 4 SCREENING OF PROJECT OPTIONS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2011 SEMP Report
    Ministry of Mines and Energy Geological Survey of Namibia Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (BGR) Strategic Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) for the Central Namib Uranium Rush 2011 Annual Report February 2013 Prepared by Geological Survey of Namibia Financial Support: The Ministry of Mines and Energy, through the Geological Survey of Namibia (GSN) and the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, through the Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR) Project Management: The Division of Engineering and Environmental Geology in the Geological Survey of Namibia, Ministry of Mines and Energy Status of Data Received: April 2012 Compiled by: Kaarina Ndalulilwa (GSN), Alina Haidula (GSN), Rosina Leonard (GSN), Israel Hasheela (GSN), Mary Hikumuah (GSN), Oscar Shaningwa (GSN), Dr Rainer Ellmies (BGR-GSN), Theo Wassenaar (NERMU), Mark Gardiner (Stanford University) Edited: Dr Gabi Schneider (GSN), Theo Wassenaar, Dr Joh Henschel (NERMU – Namib Ecological Restoration and Monitoring Unit) © Geological Survey of Namibia, Ministry of Mines and Energy 2012 Citation Geological Survey of Namibia (2012). Strategic Environmental Management Plan (SEMP) for the Central Namib Uranium Rush, 2011 Annual Report. Ministry of Mines and Energy, Windhoek, Republic of Namibia. Additional Information and queries to: The SEMP Office Dr Gabi Schneider Mr Israel Hasheela Geological Survey of Namibia Geological Survey of Namibia Ministry of Mines and Energy Ministry of Mines and Energy Private Bag 13297 Private
    [Show full text]
  • Riau Natural Gas Power Project ESIA Vol.5 Technical Appendices Part F
    DRAFT Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report Project Number: 50182-001 November 2018 INO: Riau Natural Gas Power Project ESIA Vol.5_Technical Appendices Part F Prepared by ESC for the Asian Development Bank The environmental and social impact assessment is a document of the project sponsor. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “Terms of Use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of or any territory or area. Volume 5: Technical Appendices Appendix E. KA-ANDAL Approval Letter 6 AM039100-400-GN-RPT-1014 Volume 5: Technical Appendices Appendix F. The Ministry of Agraria and Spatial Planning issued Recommendation Letter 7 AM039100-400-GN-RPT-1014 Volume 5: Technical Appendices Appendix G. Comparison of WBG EHS Guidelines with Indonesian Regulations 8 AM039100-400-GN-RPT-1014 Appendix A. Comparisons of Standards Comparison of World Bank Group IFC Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) Guidelines with Indonesian Environmental Standards Table A1: Gaseous emission for Natural Gas (all turbine types) IFC Guidelines for Thermal Power Plant Indonesian Standard** Parameter Remark Non DA (mg/m3) DA (mg/m3) Limit (mg/Nm3) Particulate Indonesian standards are N/A N/A 30 mg/Nm3 Matter stricter CO NA NA NA - NOx 51* 51* 400 mg/Nm3 IFC guidelines are stricter Indonesian standards are SO2 NA NA 150 mg/Nm3 stricter Opacity NA NA N/A - Note: The figures in red are the more stringent requirements **At dry gas, excess O2 content 15% **Gas volume counted on standard (25 deg C and 1 bar atm) **this is for 95% normal operation in 3 (three) months period ***Source: Ministry of Environmental Regulation No.
    [Show full text]
  • Social and Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Rössing Uranium Desalination Plant Near Swakopmund, Namibia
    Rössing Uranium Limited SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED RÖSSING URANIUM DESALINATION PLANT NEAR SWAKOPMUND, NAMIBIA DRAFT SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN PROJECT REFERENCE NO: 110914 DATE: NOVEMBER 2014 PREPARED BY ON BEHALF OF Rössing Uranium Desalination Plant: Draft SEMP PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT: Social and Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Rössing Uranium Desalination Plant, near Swakopmund, Namibia AUTHORS: Andries van der Merwe (Aurecon) Patrick Killick (Aurecon) Simon Charter (SLR Namibia) Werner Petrick (SLR Namibia) SEIA SPECIALISTS: Birds –Mike and Ann Scott (African Conservation Services CC) Heritage – Dr John Kinahan (Quaternary Research Services) Marine ecology – Dr Andrea Pulfrich (Pisces Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd) Noise - Nicolette von Reiche (Airshed Planning Professionals) Socio-economic - Auriol Ashby (Ashby Associates CC) - Dr Jonthan Barnes (Design and Development ServicesCC) Visual – Stephen Stead (Visual Resource Management Africa) Wastewater discharge modelling –Christoph Soltau (WSP Group) Shoreline dynamics - Christoph Soltau (WSP Group) PROPONENT: Rio Tinto Rössing Uranium Limited REPORT STATUS: Draft Social and Environmental Management Plan REPORT NUMBER: 9408/110914 STATUS DATE: 28 November 2014 .......................................... .......................................... Patrick Killick Simon Charter Senior Practitioner: Aurecon Environment and Advisory Senior Practitioner: SLR Environmental Consulting .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Wood Combustion Technology Review Appendices
    EPA-600/R-98-174b December 1998 Residential Wood Combustion Technology Review Volume 2. Appendices Prepared by: James E. Houck and Paul E.Tiegs OMNI Environmental Services, Inc. 5465 SW Western Avenue, Suite G Beaverton, OR 97005 EPA Purchase Order 7C-R285-NASX EPA Project Officer: Robert C. McCrillis U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (MD-61) National Risk Management Research Laboratory Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Prepared for: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Washington, D.C. 20460 A-i Abstract A review of the current states-of-the-art of residential wood combustion (RWC) was conducted. The key environmental parameter of concern was the air emission of particles. The technological status of all major RWC categories was reviewed. These were cordwood stoves, fireplaces, masonry heaters, pellet stoves, and wood-fired central heating furnaces. Advances in technology achieved since the mid-1980's were the primary focus. These study objectives were accomplished by reviewing the published literature and by interviewing nationally recognized RWC experts. The key findings of the review included: (1) The NSPS certification procedure only qualitatively predicts the level of emissions from wood heaters under actual use in homes, (2) Wood stove durability varies with model and a method to assess the durability problem is controversial, (3) Nationally the overwhelming majority of RWC air emissions are from non-certified devices (primarily from older non-certified woodstoves), (4) New technology appliances and fuels can reduce emissions significantly, (5) The ISO and EPA NSPS test procedures are quite dissimilar and data generated by the two procedures would not be comparable, and, (6) The effect of wood moisture and wood type on particulate emission appears to be real but to be less than an order of magnitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiparty Democracy and Elections in Namibia
    MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA ––––––––––––– ❑ ––––––––––––– Published with the assistance of NORAD and OSISA ISBN 1-920095-02-0 Debie LeBeau 9781920 095024 Edith Dima Order from: [email protected] EISA RESEARCH REPORT No 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 i MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA ii EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 iii MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA BY DEBIE LEBEAU EDITH DIMA 2005 iv EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 Published by EISA 2nd Floor, The Atrium 41 Stanley Avenue, Auckland Park Johannesburg, South Africa 2006 P O Box 740 Auckland Park 2006 South Africa Tel: 27 11 482 5495 Fax: 27 11 482 6163 Email: [email protected] www.eisa.org.za ISBN: 1-920095-02-0 EISA All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of EISA. First published 2005 EISA is a non-partisan organisation which seeks to promote democratic principles, free and fair elections, a strong civil society and good governance at all levels of Southern African society. –––––––––––– ❑ –––––––––––– Cover photograph: Yoruba Beaded Sashes Reproduced with the kind permission of Hamill Gallery of African Art, Boston, MA USA EISA Research Report, No. 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 v CONTENTS List of acronyms viii Acknowledgements x Preface xi 1. Background to multiparty democracy in Namibia 1 Historical background 1 The electoral system and its impact on gender 2 The ‘characters’ of the multiparty system 5 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authority Elections Results and Allocation of Seats
    1 Electoral Commission of Namibia 2020 Local Authority Elections Results and Allocation of Seats Votes recorded per Seats Allocation per Region Local authority area Valid votes Political Party or Organisation Party/Association Party/Association Independent Patriots for Change 283 1 Landless Peoples Movement 745 3 Aranos 1622 Popular Democratic Movement 90 1 Rally for Democracy and Progress 31 0 SWANU of Namibia 8 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 465 2 Independent Patriots for Change 38 0 Landless Peoples Movement 514 3 Gibeon 1032 Popular Democratic Movement 47 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 433 2 Independent Patriots for Change 108 1 Landless People Movement 347 3 Gochas 667 Popular Democratic Movement 65 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 147 1 Independent Patriots for Change 97 1 Landless peoples Movement 312 2 Kalkrand 698 Popular Democratic Movement 21 0 Hardap Rally for Democracy and Progress 34 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 234 2 All People’s Party 16 0 Independent Patriots for Change 40 0 Maltahöhe 1103 Landless people Movement 685 3 Popular Democratic Movement 32 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 330 2 *Results for the following Local Authorities are under review and will be released as soon as this process has been completed: Aroab, Koës, Stampriet, Otavi, Okakarara, Katima Mulilo Hardap 2 Independent Patriots for Change 180 1 Landless Peoples Movement 1726 4 Mariental 2954 Popular Democratic Movement 83 0 Republican Party of Namibia 59 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 906 2 Independent Patriots for Change 320 0 Landless Peoples Movement 2468 2 Rehoboth Independent Town
    [Show full text]
  • PISC ES Env Ir Onmental Serv Ices (Pt Y) Lt D Namparks Coastal National Parks Development Programme – Cape Cross Desalination Plant
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR A CONTAINERISED DESALINATION PLANT AT THE CAPE CROSS RESERVE MARINE ECOLOGY SPECIALIST ASSESSMENT Prepared for SLR Environmental Consulting (Namibia) (Pty) Ltd On behalf of Lund Consulting Engineers Prepared by Andrea Pulfrich September 2020 PISC ES Env ir onmental Serv ices (Pt y) Lt d NamParks Coastal National Parks Development Programme – Cape Cross Desalination Plant OWNERSHIP OF REPORTS AND COPYRIGHTS © 2020 Pisces Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd. All Rights Reserved. This document is the property of the author. The information, ideas and structure are subject to the copyright laws or statutes of South Africa and may not be reproduced in part or in whole, or disclosed to a third party, without prior written permission of the author. Copyright in all documents, drawings and records, whether produced manually or electronically, that form part of this report shall vest in Pisces Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd. None of the documents, drawings or records may be used or applied in any manner, nor may they be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means whatsoever for or to any other person, without the prior written consent of Pisces, except when they are reproduced for purposes of the report objectives as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) undertaken by SLR Environmental Consulting (Namibia) (Pty) Ltd. Andrea Pulfrich Pisces Environmental Services PO Box 302, McGregor 6708, South Africa, Tel: +27 21 782 9553 E-mail: [email protected] Website:
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Good Neighbor Environmental Board
    Annual Report of the Good Neighbor Environmental Board A Presidential and Congressional Advisory Committee on U.S.-Mexico Border Environmental and Infrastructure Issues April 1997 THE GOOD NEIGHBOR ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD AN ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON U.S.- MEXICO BORDER ENVIRONMENTAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES The President The Speaker of the House of Representatives The Vice President The Good Neighbor Environmental Board advisory committee was established by Congress in 1994, to address U.S.-Mexico border environmental and infrastructure issues and needs. The Board is comprised of a broad spectrum of individuals from business, nonprofit organizations, and state and local governments from the four states which border Mexico. The Board also has representation from eight U.S. departments and agencies. The legislation establishing the Board requires it to submit an annual report to the President and the Congress. On behalf of the Good Neighbor Environmental Board, I am happy to present this second annual report. During the past year, the Board has had extensive discussions about critical issues facing the border region, including receiving input from citizens in each of the communities where we met, and has developed a series of recommendations reflected in the enclosed report. The report and recommendations focus on changing the development paradigm along the U.S.-Mexico border--to begin to establish a sustainable development vision for the region. In addition to conventional environmental issues, the Board is also addressing health, transportation, housing, and economic development issues. The current recommendations relate largely to implementation of the new binational Border XXI framework and plan, coordination and leveraging of federal programs in the border region, encouragement of greater private sector participation, and development of needed infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roads Authorty Annual Report
    THE ROADS AUTHORTY ANNUAL REPORT CONTACT US WEB PHYSICAL ADDRESS Telephone: +264 61 284 7000 www.ra.org.na Corner of Mandume Ndemufayo Email: [email protected] and David Meroro Street, Southern Industrial Area THE ROADS AUTHORITY (RA) ANNUAL REPORT The Roads Authority, whose core business is to plan, design, construct and maintain Namibia's road sector and the operation of vehicles on national roads, plays a pivotal role in road safety in Namibia. Namibia's road network has been ranked among the safest, most efficient and sustainable, in Africa and is the envy of many countries. The growth of the road infrastructure and the expansion of the road network have contributed immensely to the economic development of Namibia and the SADC sub- region as a whole. TABLE OF CONTENTS VISION, MISSION AND VALUES 4 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 6 CHAIRPERSON'S STATEMENT 8 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 10 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 12 CEO'S STATEMENT 14 SUMMARY: RA PERFORMANCE 16 ENGINEERING SERVICES 18 TRANSPORT REGULATORY AND INSPECTORATE 32 CORPORATE SERVICES 52 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 56 VISION MISSION VALUES BRAND PROMISE OUR CORE VALUES R O RESPECT OPEN COMMUNICATION We believe that there is We believe that people who strength in diverse teams. connect and share information Therefore, we respect people freely are enabled to align THE ROADS AUTHORITY from all walks of life. towards achieving shared goals. Therefore, we commit DEFINED FIVE (5) CORE to share relevant information VALUES, ILLUSTRATED BY in an open and transparent manner. THE ACRONYM ROADS: 04 THE ROADS AUTHORITY ANNUAL REPORT 2018/19 OUR VISION A sustainable road sector which is ahead of national and regional socio-economic needs in pursuit of Namibia’s Vision 2030.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY IN SOILS OF THE WALVIS BAY – HENTIES BAY COASTAL AREA, NAMIBIA. A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NAMIBIA BY SIMON ANDREW SHIMBOYO JANUARY 2013 Supervisor: Professor James Akindele Oyedele (University of Namibia) ii ABSTRACT Naturally occurring radionuclides such as 238U, 232Th and 40K are present in the soil where they disintegrate spontaneously releasing ionizing radiation which could pose health hazards to the inhabitants of a given location especially when the concentrations of the radionuclides are high. In Namibia, the Walvis Bay – Henties Bay coastal area is known to have many mineral resources including uranium and therefore the concentrations of the radionuclides in the soils and the associated radioactivity may be high in some towns in the area. It is therefore important to study the concentrations of radionuclides and the radioactivity in the soils of the major towns in the area. In this study, the concentrations of the radionuclides 238U, 232Th and 40K and their progeny, and their contribution to natural radioactivity in the soils of six major towns in the Walvis Bay – Henties Bay coastal area have been determined. These towns are Usakos, Arandis, Swakopmund, Walvis Bay, Wlotzkasbaken and Henties Bay. A total of 305 soil samples were collected across the six towns and dried under laboratory temperature for 72 hours. These samples were pulverised and passed through a 2 mm mesh screen and sealed in 500 ml polythene bottles. The specific activities of the radionuclides 238U, 232Th and 40K in the samples were subsequently analysed using a well-shielded high-purity germanium (HPGe) detector.
    [Show full text]
  • For Proposed Exploration of Dimension Stone on EPL 5161, Erongo Region, Namibia
    Environmental Assessment and Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for proposed exploration of dimension stone on EPL 5161, Erongo Region, Namibia Date: 04 June 2020 Ecc App No.: APP-001762 Prepared for: Best Cheer Investments Namibia (Pty) Ltd Prepared by: OMAVI Geotechnical & Geo-Environmental Consultants CC (OGGC) Tel.: +264 81 300 3872 or +264 81 478 6303 Email: [email protected] 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Best Cheer Investments Namibia (Pty) Ltd (the client or Best Cheer hereafter) intends to carry out exploration activities to investigate the potential of granites and granitoid bodies on Exclusive Prospecting License (EPL) no. 5161, for use as dimension stones. The EPL is located about 25 km northeast of Arandis and covers an area of about 5059 ha. The area falls under the Karibib Constituency jurisdiction and extends across three (3) commercial farms namely Vergenoeg (no. 92), Valencia (no. 122), Namibplaas (no. 93) and one (1) communal farm Trekkopje (no. 120), however work will focus on Farm Trekkopje, particularly the middle and western parts. In order to undertake these exploration activities, an environmental clearance certificate (ECC) is required in terms of the Environmental management Act (Act No.7 of 2007) and its 2012 EIA regulations. As such, Best Cheer appointed Omavi Geotechnical and Geo-environmental Consultants CC to conduct the necessary assessments including public participation, and prepare this environmental scoping assessment (ESA) report. Best Cheer intends to adopt a systematic prospecting approach starting with desktop study, which will mostly be office based, focusing on historical data, followed by field evaluation and mapping, whereby a qualified geologist will walk the area and map it to produce a geological map with rocks of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Management in Mining: a Selection of Case Studies
    Report Water management in mining: a selection of case studies Environment May 2012 Contents Foreword 3 Flows of water to and from a mine site 4 Introduction 5 Anglo American 10 eMalahleni Water Reclamation Plant, Republic of South Africa Minera Esperanza 12 Minera Esperanza Antofagasta, Chile AREVA 14 Trekkopje uranium mine, Namibia Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold 16 Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde copper mine, Peru BHP Billiton 18 Olympic Dam, Australia Xstrata Copper 20 Lomas Bayas mine, Chile Rio Tinto22 Argyle Diamond Mine, Western Australia JX Nippon Mining & Metals 24 Toyoha mine, Japan Barrick 26 Homestake mine, United States of America AngloGold Ashanti 28 Cerro Vanguardia S.A, Argentina Acknowledgements 30 Front cover: Mandena, Madagascar Copyright © 2010 Rio Tinto www.icmm.com/our-work/projects/water Foreword d r o w e r o F 3 Water is a fundamental resource for life. Whether from groundwater or surface water sources, availability of and access to water that meets quality and quantity requirements, is a critical need across the world. We all share responsibility for meeting this need now and in the future. In mining, water is used within a broad range of activities including mineral processing, dust suppression, slurry transport, and employee requirements. Over the last several decades, the industry has made much progress in developing close-circuit approaches that maximize water conservation. At the same time, operations are often located in areas where there are not only significant competing municipal, agricultural and industrial demands but also very different perspectives on the role of water culturally and spiritually. Together, these characteristics lead to tough challenges and there is no simple recipe for water management in mining particularly because the local environments of mines range from extremely low to the highest rainfall areas in the world.
    [Show full text]