DOCSLIB.ORG

SLR I14 Jan-Feb03.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SLR I14 Jan-Feb03.Indd scottishleftreview Issue 14 January/February 2003 The voice of Scotland? What's to be done with our media? Paul Holleran on a Scottish Media Commission Gregor Gall on the state of the trade unions £1.50 £1.00 Claimants scottishleftreview comment Issue 14 January/February 2003 A journal of the left in Scotland brought about since the formation of the Scottish Parliament in July 1999 ike so many other ‘debates’ at the start of this century, Lthe debate about our media has conveniently ossified. Just like ‘free’ trade, the divine right of markets to exist, the relativity of human rights, the need for ‘just’ war or the Contents relentless requirement to ‘modernise’, discussion begins from a base which is so loaded in one direction that Comment ...............................................................2 making sense of where we are becomes difficult. Simply by repeating a few apparent axioms enough times they An open letter to our MSPs ...................................4 become the only possible starting point and then, because of the narrow alley down which they direct questions, the A socialist media policy for Scotland?...................5 only possible end point. If we begin by accepting that all Chris Atton, Robert Beveridge, Gregor Gall, Henry McCubbin, apples are red, what happens to green apples? David Miller, Roz Patterson And so it is with press freedom. When we start talking Lots of noise, but how many voices? ...................12 about what we might do about the abusive power that David Hutcheson the media wields over public life, we seem required to Holding the unaccountable to account................14 do so from a starting point of accepting that the need for the press to be ‘free’ is unquestionable. This is not to Paul Holleran suggest that we should be considering a state controlled Last left writing....................................................16 media, it is to suggest that we need to think more carefully William Bonner interviews Ian Bell about what ‘free’ means. Free to tell lies? Free to ignore Behind the braziers .............................................18 anything a proprietor doesn’t want to be known? Free to pursue a monopoly strategy? Indeed, do we really mean Gregor Gall that the ‘freedom’ of the press should be linked only to the The nuclear option...............................................20 financial ability to buy that freedom? Corrina Thomson So if we choose not to start from that point, where might Diary.....................................................................23 we start? How about if we pose the question ‘what do we want from our media?’ Despite the dumbing-down process, despite the scepticism many feel towards the Cover Illustration: Tommy Perman, [email protected] www.surfacepressure.co.uk media, despite enormous flaws, the media is one half of the absolute conditions necessary for a democracy to exist (education being the other). Democracy is another of the great untested axioms of our age. It is assumed that nothing but democracy can be countenanced, but that all that is needed is a right to vote. It is not. The right to Editorial Committee vote is no more sufficient to make someone a citizen than Aamer Anwar Henry McCubbin the right to cut someone open is to make them a doctor. Bill Bonnar Tom Nairn Unless someone is capable of understanding what the Moira Craig Andrew Noble real impact of their vote is and the extent to which it is Roseanna Cunningham Jimmy Reid (editor) achieving the outcomes they want to see for their society, John Kay Tommy Sheppard it is not expressing their will. Multiply this by millions Isobel Lindsay Alex Smith and we might be less smug in the west about assuming John McAllion Elaine Smith that our electoral system can reasonably be described as reflecting the will of its people. The worst political system Robin McAlpine Bob Thomson apart from all the rest indeed. Articles for publication should be emailed to: [email protected] To understand how a ‘free’ press can entirely negate Letters and comments should be emailed to: [email protected] democracy we need only take a glance to Venezuela. A Website: www.scottishleftreview.org Tel/Fax 0141 424 0042 democratically elected leader who connected with the Scottish Left Review, 741 Shields Road, Pollokshields, Glasgow G41 4PL sentiments of the vast numbers of dispossessed and who 2 3 represented the expression of their desire for a change in more dangerous, a small vial of ricin or a kitchen knife their society ought to be the epitome of democracy. And which, after all, is capable of killing a lot more people a lot yet, because part of his agenda for making his society more quickly? (Of course, “Kitchen Knife Found in Asylum fairer challenges the financial interests of the powerful, Seeker’s House” isn’t really going to rally much support the powerful have flipped this picture upside down. Those for a Blair speech in support of an extremist American who demand a perpetuation of poverty and starvation are regime.) those who are currently rich and sated; by no coincidence, also the people who own all of the media. By telling There is a dual strategy being pursued by the market capitalist the tale as one of a corrupt leader ignoring the almost ideologues who own our ‘free’ press. Firstly, make sure that unanimous wishes of his people they are not rewriting people don’t have the information and evidence with which history, they are rewriting now. If democracy is about the to answer any of the above questions in a way which might will of the people, Venezuela is an almost perfect example challenge the rights of a minority to entrench their privilege, of how a ‘free’ press is one of the most effective ways to but supply them with edited information and the drip-drip of ensure there is no democracy. opinion to ensure the right answer. Secondly, try to get them to opt out of these decisions altogether. Don’t be fooled into We don’t face quite the same problem in Britain or in thinking that the senior managers at Northcliffe (owners Scotland, but we are certainly in no position to be smug. of the Mail group) actually want poor people to vote. Led, The Daily Mail has made a nation with paedophilia, violent worryingly, by the Herald’s new owners Gannett, the ‘90s crime and immigration at levels below those of recent saw a process of cutting back on hard news in the American decades believe that our society is coming apart at the press and its replacement with ‘lifestyle’ copy on things such seams. In pursuit of a reactionary policy of spreading as celebrity gossip and recipes. The message is clear - your panic, the Daily Mail spends every day of the year filling fate is not actually interesting, so lets have a look at Brad our minds with fear and hatred - take a look at a week’s and Jennifer’s new baby. The analogy with the control of the Mail editorials and see if you can find one Gammas by the Alphas in Huxley’s Brave which is actually positive about something. Do we really New World is direct and complete. Make no mistake, this is an attempt to mean that undermine democracy. So we might be able to agree that a ‘free’ the ‘freedom’ media can be a pretty worrying thing, but We have the same problem in Scotland. of the press then there really isn’t any alternative, is Everyone has seen the hostility of large should be there? Not if we start from the assumption parts of the print media to the Scottish that there is no alternative. So let us for Parliament. The ordinary people of Scotland linked only to a few sentences start from a different actually think the Scottish Parliament has the financial assumption. What if all media was free spent a lot of time discussing fox hunting. ability to buy in the sense that there was no editorial Seven hours over the course of four years, control by the State, but that it could not actually. Nobody is in any doubt that the that freedom? be owned by individuals or that it could not will of the Scottish people is opposed be profit making? What if the number of to fox hunting (this is one of those clear moral issues media outlets were to be quadrupled and funded by the in which we don’t need a vast amount of information to State but contracted out to a diverse range of trusts which come to a decision - the torture of a defenceless animal controlled content, all with different political and cultural for the pleasure of a few doesn’t require much supporting viewpoints? What if all media had a public interest clause evidence), but the Mail, the Scotsman and even the Daily ensuring that distortion of fact was illegal? What if Record were not content to let it rest at that. They genuinely advertising was banned? Impossible, right? So how come believe that their will is more important. the BBC exists? But to return to the question of what we want from our This is only to say that there are alternatives, and that media, we really do have to support the right of people criticising the ‘free’ press as a dangerous thing as to express different opinions, and if the owners of currently constituted in western democracies does not newspapers want to rip foxes to shreds they have a right equate you as a Stalinist. The media has far too much to put forward their case. Trying to persuade people of power and it is painting the world in its own image with their case is not the big problem.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SLR I27.Indd
    Issue 27 March/April 2005 scottishleftreview £1.50 / £1.00 claimants Really, why bother? salvaging something from the general election scottishleftreviewIssue 27 March/April 2005 Contents Feedback.........................................................2 Old age poverty .............................................16 Ian Tasker Comment ........................................................4 What’s going on in America? ........................18 Briefing ...........................................................6 Bernie Sanders You’re a socialist; can you vote Labour? ........9 Politics is a joke ............................................20 John Flint Tommy Sheppard, Elaine Smith An MOT for MP hopefuls...............................12 Atomised science..........................................22 Jim and Margaret Cuthbert Henry McCubbin Reviews .........................................................24 feedback Letters for publication should be emailed to [email protected] he current Labour government is deeply unpopular but precisely because it is a weak Labour government. Then the Tit is more than likely to be re-elected but with a reduced extent of ordinary people’s participation in politics may be more majority. than just voting once every five years, or not even voting at all in many cases. The Conservatives offer little in the way of a serious challenge because they are still despised and internally fractious. The Professor Gregor Gall, University of Stirling Liberal Democrats are a more serious challenge in terms of ideas and policies but lack the critical mass to make a breakthrough. Parties to the left of Labour without PR are no he report commissioned by the Federation of Small more than clutches of protest votes. TBusinesses and the Sunday Herald reveals that Scotland is Does this amount to a democratic deficit, or even a crisis of not “the best small country in the world”, as claimed by Jack democracy, in Britain? Whether it does will depend upon two McConnell.
    [Show full text]
  • SLR I15 March April 03.Indd
    scottishleftreview comment Issue 15 March/April 2003 A journal of the left in Scotland brought about since the formation of the t is one of those questions that the partial-democrats Scottish Parliament in July 1999 Imock, but it has never been more crucial; what is your vote for? Too much of our political culture in Britain Contents (although this is changing in Scotland) still sees a vote Comment ...............................................................2 as a weapon of last resort. Democracy, for the partial- democrat, is about giving legitimacy to what was going Vote for us ..............................................................4 to happen anyway. If what was going to happen anyway becomes just too much for the public to stomach (or if Bill Butler, Linda Fabiani, Donald Gorrie, Tommy Sheridan, they just tire of the incumbents or, on a rare occasion, Robin Harper are actually enthusiastic about an alternative choice) then End of the affair .....................................................8 they can invoke their right of veto and bring in the next lot. Tommy Sheppard, Dorothy Grace Elder And then it is back to business as before. Three million uses for a second vote ..................11 Blair is the partial-democrat par excellence. There are David Miller two ways in which this is easily recognisable. The first, More parties, more choice?.................................14 and by far the most obvious, is the manner in which he Isobel Lindsay views international democracy. In Blair’s world view, the If voting changed anything...................................16 purpose of the United Nations is not to make a reasoned, debated, democratic decision but to give legitimacy to the Robin McAlpine actions of the powerful.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewing Economic Democracy
    Issue 30 September/October 2005 scottishleftreview £2.00 WHAT NEXT FOR EUROPE? scottishleftreviewIssue 30 September/October 2005 Contents Comment ........................................................2 Do we need Europe anyway? ........................12 André Brie Feedback .........................................................4 Power/imbalance ..........................................16 Ian Davidson Five years of SLR ............................................6 Sanctuary in Europe? ....................................18 Robin McAlpine Bob Thomson Another constitution .......................................8 Renewing economic democracy ...................20 Henry McCubbin Andy Cumbers The motor of neoliberalism ..........................10 Uncle Sam hasn’t lost the plot... ..................22 Bob Crow Derrick White Blair in the lead). That we got there under the propulsion of Comment this coalition is all we need to know to assume that this isn’t over. Blair has defiantly told us all that he is going to address o many it may feel like having a debate about the future shape the concerns of those who voted know by giving them a double Tof Europe is like having a debate about whether a dead mouse helping of what they didn’t want in the first place. He is like would have preferred cheese or chocolate. Surely the decisive a Victorian schoolmaster pouring twice as much cod liver oil rejections of the proposed European constitution in France and down the throat of the child who complained. Holland – along with the almost certain rejection
    [Show full text]
  • SLR Apr-May 2001.Indd
    scottishleftreview Issue 4 April/May 2001 WHY VOTE? The triumph of cynicism Donald Gorrie and Elaine Smith on housing stock transfer Phil McGarry on re-nationalisation of the railways £1.50 £1.00 Claimants comment scottishleftreview Issue 2 December 2000 Jimmy Reid A journal of the left in Scotland brought about since the formation of the undits of all kinds are voicing fears that the impending Scottish Parliament in July 1999 PGeneral Election will see the lowest turnout of voters in a UK election since the last war. Cynicism is Contents widespread, it is claimed, about the two main parties in Comment ................................................................ 2 the UK and the political system, and the electoral system. I believe that the British first past the post elections Cynics colluding with idealists ............................... 4 have consistently distorted the voting intentions of the Joyce McMillan is a writer and broadcaster. electorate but stoutly deny it’s a factor in voter reluctance to vote. The same goes, in my opinion, for the political No choice, no point, no vote.................................... 6 system, flawed though it is. The cynicism, though I would Henry McCubbin worked for BBC and Grampian television before call it disillusionment, among the electorate emanates becoming Labour MEP for North East Scotland and whip for the from the manifest and rampant cynicism among the two Socialist Group in the European Parliament. main UK parties. Some say they are without vision. Maybe it’s nearer the truth to say that they have the same Meet the new radicals ............................................ 9 vision. New Labour has left intact the Thatcherite State.
    [Show full text]
  • PARLEMENT EUROPEEN F
    DIRECTEUR INFO-MEMO REDACTION: DE LA PUBLICATION, BELLIARD 5027 ÉDITEUR RESPONSABLE: ÎÉL.:+322.284 2860 y;JJ,ô;;<f, Gurno NAETS FAx:+322.284 3321 REDACTEUR EN CHEF: 97-113 R. BELLIARD STR. JACQUES NANCY B-1047 BRUXELLES ' Direction de la presse ,JJElo 2)ci b: 5t'CJ'_ • Epistel/Oride:+322.522 3720 - Europlzone:+322.284 2800 Direction générale de l'information et des relations publiques PARLEMENT EUROPEEN f ,. L'INFO MEMO EDITERA DESORMAIS DES NUMEROS "SPECIAL ELECTIONS" . Ce Numéro Révisé vise à faire le point sur l'évolution des groupes politiques de 1989 à 1994 et sur les premières listes. PREMIERE PARTIE 1. TABLEAUX GLOBAUX SUR L'EVOLUTION 1989 A 1994 L'ensemble des tableaux a été élaboré en étroite coopération avec les services d'Eurostat que nous tenons à remercier. Cette coopération se poursuivra jusqu'aux élections. - Les sigles des groupes politiques du PE (p. 3, 4 et 5) - Les 4 premiers tableaux (p. 6 et 7) permettent aux lecteurs de suivre l'évolution : . session constitutive de juillet 1989 et état du parlement au 31 janvier 1994. On constate que le parlement qui avait 10 groupes en 1989 en comporte 8 au 31 janvier 1 994. députés au PE en avril 1992 et en janvier 1993 Ces deux tableaux permettent de constater : qu'en avril 1992, les 34 députés du Groupe des Démocrates Européens ont adhérés au PPE. qu'en janvier 1993, sur les 28 députés du groupe de la Gauche Unitaire Européenne, 20 PDS italiens ont adhérés au Groupe Socialiste et le 8 autres au Non Inscrits.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEWS (Composite).Qxd 1/9/04 1:38 AM Page 53
    REVIEWS (Composite).qxd 1/9/04 1:38 AM Page 53 53 Reviews Espiocracy John Le Carré, A Most Wanted Man, Hodder & Stoughton, 350 Pages, cloth ISBN 9780340977064, £18.99 James Rubin, during his brief and ill-starred career as an ‘anchor’ man for Sky News, defined ‘extraordinary rendition’ as an operation when the authorities in the country from which the US was rendering its captives didn’t know what was happening. When the authorities did know what was going on, that was simply ‘rendition’ as usual. Madeleine Albright’s junior at the Department of State during President Clinton’s second term seemed to have some direct experience of rendition and how it is practised by United States agencies. According to Rubin’s definition, the pending rendition of Issa and Abdullah, innocent and ‘five per cent bad’ respectively, at the conclusion of John Le Carré’s new novel would appear to be not at all ‘extraordinary’. Their snatch in Hamburg is facilitated by regional and Federal German agencies, even to the extent of disabling the plans of Günther Bachmann, experienced spook, who thought he had the support of German foreign intelligence. Bachmann contends that Hamburg was 9/11’s second ground zero. Mohamed Atta, who flew one of planes into New York’s Twin Towers on that sunny September morning, came from Cairo to Hamburg in 1992 to continue his architectural studies. In due course, he joined with others to plan the attacks on the United States. How had German intelligence failed to stop this? The answer lies in part in the failure to recruit influential persons in the Muslim community, according to Bachmann.
    [Show full text]
  • SLR I23.Indd
    Issue 23 July/August AFTER THE WAR peace, protest and human rights in Scotland scottishleftreviewIssue 23 July/August 2004 Contents Comment ........................................................2 Human rights in Scotland.............................12 Amnesty International Feedback.........................................................4 The world thing.............................................14 Briefing ...........................................................5 Tom Nairn A permanent state of terror?..........................6 Pill tax ...........................................................16 Colin Fox Aamer Anwar Scotland the grave ..........................................8 A Europe against workers?...........................18 Bob Thomson Liz Law Prepare to protest.........................................10 That was the Euro election that was ............20 Henry McCubbin Gill Hubbard of great change in one direction or the other, and it is the US Comment presidential election which is at the heart of it. But it would be wrong to think that what has been done will be easily undone. he Greeks think there are too many Albanians coming to Kerry might be more subtle about it, but he isn’t about to let Ttheir country. The Germans worry about too many former America lose out to China in the battle for the soon-to-peak Eastern Bloc economic migrants. The French seem to be global oil supply. And global fury and humiliation are not getting increasingly hostile to their large Muslim community. about to disappear because of the election
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter School Club June 2009
    Allan Glen's Newsletter School Club June 2009 President - Gregor Egan In This Issue 15 Lowndes Street Barrhead Glasgow G78 2QX 0141 881 5101 New Committee - Page 3 [email protected] The Two Bills - Page 4 Vice-President - Ronnie Wright 134 Boghead Road 2 Illustrious OB's - Pages 6 & 7 Kirkintilloch Glasgow G66 4EN Teacher's contacted - Page 8 Secretary - Dr Ian Dale Minutes of 2009 AGM- Page 11 & 12 112 Speirs Road Bearsden G61 2NU tel 0141 563 8055 [email protected] Introducing the new President - Gregor Egan Treasurer - Mike McCreery 1 Duart Drive, Newton Mearns Gentlemen, it is customary for the incoming President to state what Glasgow G77 5DS [email protected] an honour and a privilege is it to accept this role and I am no different when I tell you that I am genuinely honoured and privileged Editor to take up the role of President of this important Club. However, Alan McLellan 3 First Avenue Netherlee these words are quite inadequate to express the full depth of my Glasgow G44 3UA feelings towards the Allan Glen’s School Club. When I look at the [email protected] list of important people who have carried out the duties of President Lunch Club - Gordon Day in the past, I am truly both humbled and proud. One name that has 34 Lomond Drive Bishopbriggs always jumped out at me from the list is George H. Sommerfield G64 3BZ tel 0141 772 3756 who was instrumental in starting me off on a career in engineering. I and - George Smith Newhouse Farm Barrhead owe him a tremendous debt of gratitude as well as the School.
    [Show full text]
  • Houses of Straw Pfi Blows Our Future Scottishleftreviewissue 33 March/April 2006 Contents Comment
    Issue 33 March/April 2006 scottishleftreview £2.00 houses of straw pfi blows our future scottishleftreviewIssue 33 March/April 2006 Contents Comment ........................................................2 Living with PFI ..............................................18 A midwife The private finance illusion ............................4 Incapacitated Scotland .................................20 Dave Watson Margaret and Jim Cuthbert Only the profit is healthy ...............................10 Birth of a phantom revolution .......................22 Mark Hellowell Aileen Orr The profit myth ..............................................14 Restoring wisdom .........................................24 Andy Cumbers Chris Thomson The strange case of the Ayrshire schools ....16 Fairness in action ..........................................28 Henry McCubbin/Campbell Martin Molly Scott Cato Comment he sensation of PFI is like the sensation of watching your driver behind PFI. Understanding the real attraction of PFI is Tdrink get knocked over but in slow motion – you know that difficult for most people; most of us simply don’t think in terms by the time you grab it, it’s really too late. The evidence against of how to ensure that the very rich become richer at the expense contracting private companies to build public buildings and of the rest. But that’s the thing about PFI. Business expansion then leasing them back over 30 years is overwhelming. They – in the eyes of the true believer – is hampered by no-go clearly cost more – much more. The need to squeeze profits areas, prime among them the public sector. Almost everything out of these public buildings results in cuts – hospitals typically the Blair Government has done has been about enabling big lose 30 per cent of their beds when rebuilt in this manner. commercial interests to more efficiently exploit markets, The contracting out process simply does not transfer risk as particularly markets that were closed to them.
    [Show full text]
  • SLR I222.Indd
    scottishleftreviewIssue 22 May/June 2004 Contents Comment ........................................................2 What’s a vote worth?.....................................14 Gordon Morgan Feedback.........................................................4 Making a corpse of habeas corpus...............16 Briefing ...........................................................5 Duncan McFarlane Pre-selective memories .................................6 Labouring the point on immigration ............18 Henry McCubbin Isobel Lindsay Spending for now and the future ....................8 A worker wins ...............................................20 James Higney Mark Ballard Ending poverty means paying.......................10 The supporter ...............................................22 Derrick White William Bonnar Spender bias .................................................12 Beating Liblaboryism....................................24 Joe Middleton Scottish Woman’s Budget Group Comment t makes no sense whatsoever to evaluate a car on the basis of things were happening which hadn’t been predicted. This is a Iits nutritional value just as it is pointless to measure a sandwich process which is usually known as ‘side effects’. The problem according to its fuel consumption. In the same way, there is no is that there is no such thing as a side effect, only effects. A pill point in trying to assess Jack McConnell as a national leader which cures baldness but kills you kills you just as surely as a on the basis of how successfully he has transformed Scotland pill which is designed to kill you but accidentally also prevents into a better country; Jack simply isn’t in the transformation baldness. And so if Blair’s NHS targets meant that waiting lists business. He came to power with the aim of taking a firm grip dropped but waiting times increased then the target failed. of the wheel of a vessel which he felt had been blown off course Equally, asking the public if the government is doing well is by events.
    [Show full text]
  • Foot and Mouth Disease in Scotland July 2002 Donors to the RSE Inquiry Into Foot and Mouth Disease in Scotland
    Inquiry into Foot and Mouth Disease in Scotland July 2002 Donors to the RSE Inquiry into Foot and Mouth Disease in Scotland The Buccleuch Estate Ltd The Institute of Auctioneers and Appraisers The Carnegie United Kingdom Trust The MacRobert Trust Colin Strang Steel New Scientist Frank Parkinson Agricultural Trust Snowie Group Glenrath Farms Ltd The Robertson Trust plus a number of anonymous donations from several individuals and Charitable Trusts In undertaking public meetings in Dumfries and Galloway, and the Borders, the Inquiry also acknowledges the support and assistance of: Scottish Enterprise, Dumfries and Galloway Stagecoach Ltd Scottish Borders Council Dumfries and Galloway Council The Royal Society of Edinburgh (RSE) is Scotland’s National Academy. Born out of the intellectual ferment of the Scottish Enlightenment, the RSE was founded in 1783 by Royal Charter for the “advancement of learning and useful knowledge”. As a wholly independent, non-party-political body with charitable status, the RSE is a forum for informed debate on issues of national and international importance and draws upon the expertise of its multidisciplinary Fellowship of men and women of international standing, to provide independent, expert advice to key decision-making bodies, including Government and Parliament. The multidisciplinary membership of the RSE makes it distinct amongst learned Societies in Great Britain and its peer-elected Fellowship encompasses excellence in the Sciences, Arts, Humanities, the Professions, Industry and Commerce. The Royal Society of Edinburgh is committed to the future of Scotland’s social, economic and cultural well-being. RSE Inquiry into Foot and Mouth Disease in Scotland i Foreword The Foot and Mouth outbreak which first occurred in Scotland in early 2001 had widespread and far-reaching consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland the What?
    Issue 43 November/December 2007 scottishleftreview £2.00 Scotland the What? Identity and politics in 2007 dour scottishleftreviewIssue 43 November/December 2007 Contents Comment ........................................................2 Lifting the lid on PFI .....................................13 Feedback ........................................................3 Jim and Margaret Cuthbert This is the Scottish Programme ...................17 Briefing ...........................................................4 Henry McCubbin Isobel Lindsay Prison works .................................................20 Not scared to be ourselves .............................6 Gary Fraser Jimmy Reid Policies have personalities .............................8 Web Review ...................................................22 Robin McAlpine Kick Up The Tabloids.....................................23 A slogan for Scotland... .................................11 Various Comment hat is the Scottish character? People worry about dealing of the US, the long-standing bigotry of the Orange Order and Wwith lazy stereotypes, but Scottish identity matters. The in return the violent reaction of parts of the ‘Celtic-minded’ jumping-off point for this issue of the Scottish Left Review was population. The racism and suspicion of some others (including the scrapping of the ‘Best Small Country in the World’ slogan our closest neighbours…). The colonialism and the national and the ranks of people who were ready to say that it wasn’t drive for Big Profit (from the Darien Project
    [Show full text]