DOCSLIB.ORG

Elk River Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A 13.2 EL 5/8 / states .. ient of Management Plan AgriculIture Forest Service Elk Wild and Scenic River Pacific Northwest Region Siskiyou National Forest State Parks and Recreation State of Oregon Department 1994 In order to conserve our AW, natural resources, this Qt document has been printed on recycled paper United States Forest Siskiyou 200 NE Greenfield Road Department of Service National PO Box 440 Agriculture Forest Grants Pass, OR 97526-0242 Reply to: 1920 Date: September 22, 1994 Dear Reader, Enclosed is the Elk River Wild and Scenic River Plan. The Environmental Assessment and Decision Notice are located in Appendix A. This plan is a joint effort with the State of Oregon. The Oregon Department of Parks and Recreation has the lead responsibility for the State for the planning for Elk River as a state designated scenic waterway. Implementation of this plan will not occur until 30 days following the publication of the legal notice of the decision in the Grants Pass Daily Courier. I appreciate the sincere efforts made by many people to help us develop the management plan for this valuable river. My thanks to each of you. J. MICHAEL LUNN Forest Supervisor BOUTMlRNQBlGit4 $TATi OLLEGE uBRARY 38 4903~ 5 Summary - Project Location SISKIYOU NATIONAL FOREST Figure S-1, Vicinity Map ELKRIVER WILD AND SCENIC RIYERPIANNING AREA VICINITY' MA - Mak., :-'-:.," CAT JOWT'.Lfl t.)~~~~~~~~~~~FS fi I 12 ..._ W< ., '.'.'2: --- CZI f. ;- . v , _ ASS-Y- .Xi. , ,- :NO s*....--.- /;. : . ~. 31- (FF :S.3l i. - HA Ey5R I,..',' mt r' - ' 5..'-' ; - n(STAT{) ..........S:S ; I w _ . ]i I / - x-t I ?.- - -.7: -IT! _ >, 4 A , Is*;-1 _ * _ * t .* o - . _ r: ,,. YJLDEN Z', I - I * _ 1: , , _ 1 t. .,- / -.- M . I - -. .5-..- 0* '5-. *. -. tz-1.,;X ' 4 .1 --1-A lz 'N -1 I"'I; I ::-: I' .. .:::.' ..aM:. .- : ' I Pearse Pk ~~~~~SUN(S N ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ I Purple 1 L g ~~~~~~~~~~'-I*, N . .. _r6E ?I ~~~~~~~;Pt 23 C!Z~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~5 9~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\ .-'t ,lo' .,5 . 'I,'01I- :- t4 "IO A .27- 11 25 /I\ I l -.1 I : ABM 1,56 eaJtra.4 \0 5- -N. _A / 3ald Mtn .AI ! i- - q .- I I ~~~~, R. 1 _ IckJR W~~~~~~0-5 4'VABP 7K~ ~~217 :R Pkw I ' mmm il \ S - 2 Elk Wild and Scenic River Management Plan - DEIS Summary - Project Location KEY MAP i . '---I N tC i] \X V. _ I. _t 11 ' \ JA... .. _I_'l7l - IarBM-17 2-- 512t-l3W|~~~~~in-- I WN ?. - F% I 0*Ww - -L, rr-, trn __ -1-I -N - N 1~ I *. W ;_ '_S, I . I J 2. I2>q "e_-- 2".1 26 011, t B~~~~~~~tler.,~~~~~~~~ . qe TJ5 / Lf - I 27 ' 3l-'ig ,2 ; _ . , Cr 4, ,tneg,2K; '~~G ra n i 3 5 : I ..... E. --. - ^ - ''f' tn 7 . 'iik.3 )" + s ..I.. 0- .... 9 xI r' :J i osi1 II ...,WC .,-et II, jJ _, * I L L. _ J I - J8 1 I Copper N, -u<( t4_; C~~~~~~~~i' i5I 2 4 ,I \ 'lM t n,,, 1,2 :3 i :: . :.'. .. 7r I S-,@t -, *--.%::: . .. - 6 i00I ,_ - --5S3- - . I ,f I NTHEPA;._ alrd4. EEK 2 1 2 Z-, PM 2 2-11 Hlt 20 bu'ryn L Xrzm 3 0 29 28 2 7 2 6 TOA 35 C-W-61unfain I c itui:2 D.Y-.r-Am Ol % 4 2SCA4 A C 10K ETf . 'El Wild and Scenic River Management Plan 0 - 0 ELK RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ELK RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Title Page THE RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN: PURPOSE AND NEED, VALUES AND ISSUES, AND RIVER DESCRIPTION 1-1 Purpose and Need 1-1 A Word About Terminology 1-1 Federal and State Designations for the Elk River 1-2 Wild and Scenic River Designation 1-2 Oregon State Scenic Waterway Designation 1-3 Relationship of the Plan to the Forest Plan 1-3 Values 1-4 Outstandingly Remarkable Values and Special Attributes 1-4 Description of River Corridor 1-5 Access 1-5 River Use 1-7 Land Ownership and Land Use 1-7 Navigability of the Elk River 1-8 County Land Use Regulations 1-8 11 MANAGEMENT GOALS AND DESIRED FUTURE CONDITION 11-1 Federal Management Goals 11-1 State Management Goals 11-2 Desired Future Condition of the River Corridor 11-2 III STATE SCENIC WATERWAY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 111-1 Overview 111-1 Classifications 111-1 State Classifications for the Elk Scenic Waterway 111-2 Land Management Rules for the Elk Scenic Waterway 111-3 Land Management Rules for Individual Segments of the Elk 111-4 Scenic Waterway 111-4 Minimum Flow Requirements for the Elk River Scenic Waterway 1114 IV FEDERAL WILD AND SCENIC RIVER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IV-1 Overview IV-1 Management Actions IV-1 Fish Habitat Enhancement IV-1 Facilities IV-1 Mining Impacts IV-2 Enhancement of Scenery IV-2 Maintaining Ecological and Botanical Integrity IV-2 Watershed Restoration Projects IV-2 Private Property IV-2 Boundary Location IV-2 Elk River Management Plan i-1 Table of Contents Standards and Guidelines IV-3 Monitoring Plan IV-10 V IMPLEMENTATION V-1 Roles and Responsibilities of Management Partners V-1 Federal Agencies V-1 State Agencies V-2 Management Actions V-4 Appendix Title Page A DECISION NOTICE DN-1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Al-1 B ELK RIVER WILD AND SCENIC BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION B-1 C STATE SCENIC WATERWAY GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE RULES C-1 D ELK RIVER RESOURCE ASSESSMENT D-1 E ELK RIVER WATERSHED ANALYSIS E-1 Elk River Management Plan ELK RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN CHAPTER I Purpose and Need CHAPTER I PURPOSE AND NEED, VALUES AND ISSUES, AND RIVER DESCRIPTION PURPOSE AND NEED The Elk River from its confluence with Anvil Creek upstream to a point on the North Fork approximately two miles above the confluence of the North and South Forks was designated by Congress as a National Wild and Scenic River in 1988. The Elk River from the Hatchery to the headwaters of the north and south forks was also designated as an Oregon Scenic Waterway in 1988. The Forest Service and Oregon State Parks and Recreation Department agreed to develop a joint federal-state management plan for the designated portions of the Elk River. The federal legislation required the Forest Service to develop a management plan for the Wild and Scenic River within three years. However, due to regional controversy surrounding protection of the spotted Owl, marbled murrelet, old growth forests, anadromous fisheries and other old-growth dependent species, development of this plan was postponed until now. Further details of plan development can be found in the Environmental Assessment attached to this plan. This joint plan - the Elk River Management Plan - will guide management of both the federal and state designated portions of the Elk River until the plan is revised. The River Management Plan will provide for protection and enhancement of resource values in the river corridor, and allow public use and enjoyment of those resource values. This River Management Plan is accompanied by an Environmental Assessment. The Environmental Assessment gives the public information about the planning process used and the environmental analysis done by the river planning team for the federally designated segments of the River Management Plan. The document describes alternative methods for managing National Forest Lands within the Elk River and describes the environmental effects posed by such management to the resources and values in the federally designated segments. The alternative chosen as the 'Proposed Action" alternative (Alternative 1), from the Environmental Assessment is the framework for this River Management Plan. Prior to the development of the Elk River Management Plan, the Elk River watershed has been managed according to the Siskiyou Land and Resource Management Plan (1989). The Elk River Management Plan results in non-significant changes to the Siskiyou Land and Resource Management Plan as amended by the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement on Management of Habitat for Late-Successional and Old-Growth Forest Related Species Within the Range of the Northern Spotted Owl (1994) and thereby amends the previous plan to reflect the changes identified in this plan. A Word About Terminology Several terms will be used throughout this document in reference to the Elk River and river corridor above the fish hatchery. To avoid confusion, these terms are defined here. * Scenic Waterway The parts of the Elk River designated as an Oregon Scenic Waterway * Wild and Scenic River or Wild and Scenic Corridor The federally designated Wild and Scenic Elk River * The Siskiyou Forest Plan The Siskiyou National Forest Land and Resource Man- agement Plan (1989) * The President's Forest Plan The Final Supplemental Environmental Impact State- ment on Management of Habitat for Late-Successional and Old-Growth Forest Related Species Within the Range of the Northern Spotted Owl (February, 1994) Elk River Management Plan I - 1 Purpose and Need * The ROD and S & G's The Record of Decision for Amendments to Forest Serv- ice and Bureau of Land Management Planning Docu- ments Within the Range fo the Northern Spotted Owl and the Standards and Guidelines for Management of Habitat for Late-Successional and Old-Growth Related Species Within the Range of the Northern Spotted Owl (April 13, 1994) * The Watershed Analysis The Elk River Watershed Analysis (1994) completed in accordance with the Aquatic Conservation Strategy in the President's Plan. * MA-2 - Wild River The Wild River area as defined and mapped as the Proposed Action Alternative * MA-1 OA - Scenic Recreation River The Scenic/Recreation River area as defined and mapped as the Proposed Action alternative.
Recommended publications
  • 2019 Oregon Administrative Rules Compilation

    2019 Oregon Administrative Rules Compilation

    2019 OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES COMPILATION CHAPTER 736 Parks and Recreation Department Published By DENNIS RICHARDSON Secretary of State Copyright 2019 Office of the Secretary of State Rules effective as of January 01, 2019 DIVISION 1 PROCEDURAL RULES 736-001-0000 Notice of Proposed Rules 736-001-0005 Model Rules of Procedure 736-001-0030 Fees for Public Records DIVISION 2 ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES 736-002-0010 State Park Cooperating Associations 736-002-0015 Working with Donor Organizations 736-002-0020 Criminal Records Checks 736-002-0030 Definitions 736-002-0038 Designated Positions: Authorized Designee and Contact Person 736-002-0042 Criminal Records Check Process 736-002-0050 Preliminary Fitness Determination. 736-002-0052 Hiring or Appointing on a Preliminary Basis 736-002-0058 Final Fitness Determination 736-002-0070 Crimes Considered 736-002-0102 Appealing a Fitness Determination 736-002-0150 Recordkeeping, Confidentiality, and Retention 736-002-0160 Fees DIVISION 3 WILLAMETTE RIVER GREENWAY PLAN 736-003-0005 Willamette River Greenway Plan DIVISION 4 DISTRIBUTION OF ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE FUNDSTO PUBLIC AND PRIVATELY OWNED LANDMANAGERS, ATV CLUBS AND ORGANIZATIONS 736-004-0005 Purpose of Rule 736-004-0010 Statutory Authority 736-004-0015 Definitions 736-004-0020 ATV Grant Program: Apportionment of Monies 736-004-0025 Grant Application Eligibility and Requirements 736-004-0030 Project Administration 736-004-0035 Establishment of the ATV Advisory Committee 736-004-0045 ATV Operating Permit Agent Application and Privileges 736-004-0060
  • Environmental Conditions Appendix II

    Environmental Conditions Appendix II

    Environmental Conditions Environmental Conditions Appendix II The unique geology, hydrology and climates of the Deschutes River Subbasin create a diverse mix of habitat conditions for fish and wildlife. These populations are linked to the ecosystems in which they live and their health, individual characteristics and abundance reflect the diversity ― and quality ― of their environments. Fish populations, for instance, developed complex life histories through time that responded to the subbasin’s considerable variation in habitat conditions. Stream flows, water temperatures, substrate characteristics and other combined attributes affected anadromous fish distribution within the subbasin and timing of migration. Wildlife population abundance and distribution also developed in response to habitat conditions. Native grasslands once covered vast areas and supported species such as sage grouse, which once occurred exclusively in this habitat. Loss of grassland habitat greatly reduced such populations. Today subbasin habitat conditions continue to influence fish and wildlife production, distribution and survival. These habitats and their attributes ― as well as the aquatic and terrestrial populations they support ― are affected by both natural watershed processes and human activities that influence flow, water quality, upland and riparian conditions and instream habitat. This chapter examines how environmental conditions in the Deschutes watershed affect the subbasin’s fish and wildlife populations. Building on the more general review provided in the Overview, the discussion characterizes the environmental conditions within three watershed areas: the Lower Deschutes watershed (below RM 100), Crooked River watershed, and Upper Deschutes watershed (above RM 100). It characterizes the natural watershed environments, such as geology, climate and hydrology, and the focal fish species they support.
  • Oregon Historic Trails Report Book (1998)

    Oregon Historic Trails Report Book (1998)

    i ,' o () (\ ô OnBcox HrsroRrc Tnans Rpponr ô o o o. o o o o (--) -,J arJ-- ö o {" , ã. |¡ t I o t o I I r- L L L L L (- Presented by the Oregon Trails Coordinating Council L , May,I998 U (- Compiled by Karen Bassett, Jim Renner, and Joyce White. Copyright @ 1998 Oregon Trails Coordinating Council Salem, Oregon All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Oregon Historic Trails Report Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Project history 3 Introduction to Oregon's Historic Trails 7 Oregon's National Historic Trails 11 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail I3 Oregon National Historic Trail. 27 Applegate National Historic Trail .41 Nez Perce National Historic Trail .63 Oregon's Historic Trails 75 Klamath Trail, 19th Century 17 Jedediah Smith Route, 1828 81 Nathaniel Wyeth Route, t83211834 99 Benjamin Bonneville Route, 1 833/1 834 .. 115 Ewing Young Route, 1834/1837 .. t29 V/hitman Mission Route, 184l-1847 . .. t4t Upper Columbia River Route, 1841-1851 .. 167 John Fremont Route, 1843 .. 183 Meek Cutoff, 1845 .. 199 Cutoff to the Barlow Road, 1848-1884 217 Free Emigrant Road, 1853 225 Santiam Wagon Road, 1865-1939 233 General recommendations . 241 Product development guidelines 243 Acknowledgements 241 Lewis & Clark OREGON National Historic Trail, 1804-1806 I I t . .....¡.. ,r la RivaÌ ï L (t ¡ ...--."f Pðiräldton r,i " 'f Route description I (_-- tt |".
  • Metolius River LLID: 1212861445954

    Metolius River LLID: 1212861445954

    ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT STREAM REPORT STREAM: Metolius River LLID: 1212861445954 BASIN: Deschutes River HUC NUMBER: 17070301 DATES: June 21 - July 14, 2011 SURVEY CREWS: Frank Drake / Mark McLaughlin REPORT PREPARED BY: Staci Stein USGS MAPS: Black Butte, Candle Creek, Prairie Spring Farm ECOREGION: Cascade Eastern North BASIN AREA: 795 km2 FIRST ORDER TRIBUTARIES: 50+ GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Metolius River habitat survey began at the confluence of Jefferson Creek and continued upstream 21,049 meters to end at the headwater springs surfacing from the hillside. Nine reaches were designated based on changes in channel morphology and contributions from major tributary junctions. The river channel was constrained by terraces and hillslopes. Land uses were mature trees (50-90cm dbh), large timber (30-50cm dbh), rural residential property, and second growth timber (15-30cm dbh). The crew floated the river with inflatable kayaks in the lower reaches (Reaches 1-4) where the river was too swift and deep for safe and accurate measurements by foot. The upper reaches (Reaches 5-9) of the river were surveyed by foot. Overall stream substrate was a combination of gravel (36%), sand (24%), cobble (18%), and silt and organic fines (11%). The stream habitat types were predominately riffles (50%), scour pools (28%), and rapids (14%). Large wood debris volume ranged from 1.5-17.8m3/100m. The trees observed most frequently in the riparian zones were conifers ranging from 3-50cm dbh (based on thirty-one riparian transects). REACH DESCRIPTIONS: Reach 1: (T12S-R09E-S02NE) Length 3029 meters. Reach 1 began at the confluence with Jefferson Creek and continued to Bridge 99.
  • Interpreting Landscape Change in High Mountains of Northeastern Oregon from Long-Term Repeat Photography

    Interpreting Landscape Change in High Mountains of Northeastern Oregon from Long-Term Repeat Photography

    United States Department of Interpreting Landscape Change in High Agriculture Forest Service Mountains of Northeastern Oregon from Pacific Northwest Research Station Long-Term Repeat Photography General Technical Report Jon M. Skovlin, Gerald S. Strickler, Jesse L. Peterson, PNW-GTR-505 May 2001 and Arthur W. Sampson Photo by Harley Richardson 1920 Photo by David Jensen 1992 Authors Jon M. Skovlin (retired) was a principal research scientist, Forestry and Range Sciences Laboratory, 1401 Gekeler Lane, La Grande, OR 97850. He now is a consultant on renewable natural resources, P.O. Box 121, Cove, OR 97824. Gerald S. Strickler (deceased) was a range scientist, Forestry and Range Sciences Laboratory, 1401 Gekeler Lane, La Grande, OR 97850. Jesse L. Peterson (deceased) was range examiner, Wallowa National Forest, Wallowa, OR, and later chief range examiner, Whitman National Forest, Baker City, OR. Arthur W. Sampson (deceased) was the pioneer range scientist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, and later Professor of Forestry, University of California, Berkeley, CA. This publication was prepared under contract with the Blue Mountains Natural Resources Institute, La Grande, OR. All photos not otherwise credited were taken by the senior author. Cover Photos Glacier Peak is a satellite point along Eagle Cap Ridge, which is the central watershed feature of the Wallowa Mountain batholith. Upper–This photo of Benson Glacier looking south from Glacier Lake was taken in about 1920. The conspicuous glacier flow lines and crevasses affirm its activity, which had been in recession since about 1870 after the end of the Little Ice Age in about 1850. Harley Richardson captured the Benson Glacier on film when it was in rapid retreat.
  • Jefferson County General Reports

    Jefferson County General Reports

    JEFFERSON COUNT¥ ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY STUDY Geologist (125 days@ $125/day) • $ 15,600 * Editing (65 days@ $77/day) • 5,000 * Cartography. 4,000 * Supplies. • 750 * Printing. • 4,900 Travel and per diem Per diem - $27.50 x 60 days •••••••••• • $1,650 Travel to job - 566 (mi. round trip) x 12 x 14¢. 948 Travel on job - 100 x 60 x 14¢ • • •••• 840 3,438 * Overhead on* items above - $28,788 x 20%. 5,757 TOTAL. • • • $ 39,445 Maps: (1) Geology - 4 or 5 color (1 inch= 3 miles) (2) Mineral deposits (combine with geology?) (3) Urban - 7~' - 1:24,000 (black and white) Bulletin Start August 1 if no ERDA uranit.nn study Start March 1, 1978, if ERDA uranium study Contract for flat fee - 60% from county •••••••••••••• $ 24,000 )< Gs-C!J~C-/j' ~ )( -· /-J t:Cl rT,; >-J c; .,, /~ 6DO ;,, Cdjvz To_; 5;0CJO ;Jl(d-, p F J' cL..,.-'.=. 5 ~ (;Yoo -:? / rtZ,, ✓ J /; ✓ (-; -7so y/- ) <",,,..., •..f10 -0, 4 / 9 CJO 77.o, v _, /-O,.tz: T ;,s ... ~ /.J; L:>Vt 7e.,, u 7o JD";, z 8 3 fl? ,. ,. 2- x: / z. ,c /~ ~ , ' Q ,,,-1 ;;;;-~ / ,,...,,c"? )('. 5 y / 2- )C / ,3. ~ /L~/-'.,'/~5 /4 G'~?--8~·-r - 4 -c,-r 5°' Cr?n-c;;,.>c - ~"'--,s ;' /./'I.,.,,, ✓ ~ "'1L /JJSPc,s,-,s Cc ~&-rs/--. i-v~ ,,'-( qco <- oc,-r- •;,; LJ «: ~,e,o,/ - 7£/ / - - ✓, ~,.G ~ t' )OO -/3Ch/ . • . C),,..J t:,..._,?. ~s "7? .)(/ -0.,...-e:. ~~r. T>m1,~ --<--. ~$r ', 1 ,·? J y ~ /tf. tr--0 ro.. A Jz.&.o If/. IJO '1.i,,,,{ • /tJ.oo /'J.-6-C)O 3, Cf I 00 tJ(tt':ll' 5! 00 ,, .:2,..S~ .56',oo ·' .5t' ro ')..&,/, 00 ,, ~)-1, (co ,.
  • Monitoring Wolverines in Northeast Oregon – 2011

    Monitoring Wolverines in Northeast Oregon – 2011

    Monitoring Wolverines in Northeast Oregon – 2011 Submitted by The Wolverine Foundation, Inc. Title: Monitoring Wolverine in Northeast Oregon – 2011 Authors: Audrey J. Magoun, Patrick Valkenburg, Clinton D. Long, and Judy K. Long Funding and Logistical Support: Dale Pedersen James Short Marsha O’Dell National Park Service Norcross Wildlife Foundation Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Seattle Foundation The Wolverine Foundation, Inc. U.S. Forest Service Wildlife Conservation Society Special thanks to all those individuals who provided observations of wolverines in the Wallowa- Whitman National Forest and other areas in Oregon. We also thank Tim Hiller, Mark Penninger, and Glenn McDonald for their assistance in the field work. This document should be cited as: Magoun, A. J., P. Valkenburg, C. D. Long, and J. K. Long. 2011. Monitoring wolverines in northeast Oregon – 2011. Final Report. The Wolverine Foundation, Inc., Kuna, Idaho, USA. 2 INTRODUCTION The Oregon Conservation Strategy lists “species data gaps” and “research and monitoring needs” for some species where basic information on occurrence and habitat associations are not known (ODFW 2006; pages 367-368). For the Blue Mountains, East Cascades, and West Cascades Ecoregions of Oregon, the Strategy lists wolverine as a species for which status is unknown but habitat may be suitable to support wolverines. ODFW lists the wolverine as Threatened in Oregon and the USFWS has recently placed the species on the candidate list under the federal Endangered Species Act. Wolverine range in the contiguous United States had contracted substantially by the mid-1900s, probably because of high levels of human-caused mortality and very low immigration rates (Aubry et al.
  • O R E G O N North Pacific Ocean

    O R E G O N North Pacific Ocean

    412 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 7, Chapter 9 31 MAY 2020 Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 7—Chapter 9 124° 123° NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage 18520 C O L http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml U M B I A 126° 125° 18521 R Astoria I V E R 46° Seaside Tillamook Head NEHALEM RIVER 18556 Vancouver 18558 TILLAMOOK BAY Portland Cape Lookout Cascade Head 45° SILETZ RIVER YAQUINA RIVER ALSEA RIVER 18581 18561 NORTH PA CIFIC OCEAN OREGON Heceta Head 44° 18583 SIUSLAW RIVER 18584 UMPQUA RIVER 18587 Coos Bay Cape Arago 18588 COQUILLE RIVER 43° 18589 Cape Blanco 18600 18580 Port Orford ROUGE RIVER 18601 CHETCO RIVER 42° 18602 CALIFORNIA 31 MAY 2020 U.S. Coast Pilot 7, Chapter 9 ¢ 413 Chetco River to Columbia River, Oregon (1) This chapter describes 200 miles of the Oregon coast rare clear skies; it is more likely in early winter. Winter from the mouth of the Chetco River to the mouth of the and spring winds are moderately strong, particularly south Columbia River. Also described are the Chetco and Rogue of Newport. From North Bend southward, winds reach 17 Rivers, Port Orford, Coquille River, Coos Bay, Umpqua knots or more about 5 to 15 percent of the time and 28 and Siuslaw Rivers, Yaquina Bay and River, Nehalem knots or more about 1 to 3 percent of the time. Extreme River and Tillamook Bay. The cities of Coos Bay and wind speeds usually occur in either winter or early spring North Bend on Coos Bay and Newport on Yaquina Bay and have climbed to around 50 knots.
  • Monitoring Wolverines in Northeast Oregon

    Monitoring Wolverines in Northeast Oregon

    Monitoring Wolverines in Northeast Oregon January 2011 – December 2012 Final Report Authors: Audrey J. Magoun Patrick Valkenburg Clinton D. Long Judy K. Long Submitted to: The Wolverine Foundation, Inc. February 2013 Cite as: A. J. Magoun, P. Valkenburg, C. D. Long, and J. K. Long. 2013. Monitoring wolverines in northeast Oregon. January 2011 – December 2012. Final Report. The Wolverine Foundation, Inc., Kuna, Idaho. [http://wolverinefoundation.org/] Copies of this report are available from: The Wolverine Foundation, Inc. [http://wolverinefoundation.org/] Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife [http://www.dfw.state.or.us/conservationstrategy/publications.asp] Oregon Wildlife Heritage Foundation [http://www.owhf.org/] U. S. Forest Service [http://www.fs.usda.gov/land/wallowa-whitman/landmanagement] Major Funding and Logistical Support The Wolverine Foundation, Inc. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Oregon Wildlife Heritage Foundation U. S. Forest Service U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Wolverine Discovery Center Norcross Wildlife Foundation Seattle Foundation Wildlife Conservation Society National Park Service 2 Special thanks to everyone who provided contributions, assistance, and observations of wolverines in the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest and other areas in Oregon. We appreciate all the help and interest of the staffs of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Oregon Wildlife Heritage Foundation, U. S. Forest Service, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wildlife Conservation Society, and the National Park Service. We also thank the following individuals for their assistance with the field work: Jim Akenson, Holly Akenson, Malin Aronsson, Norma Biggar, Ken Bronec, Steve Bronson, Roblyn Brown, Vic Coggins, Alex Coutant, Cliff Crego, Leonard Erickson, Bjorn Hansen, Mike Hansen, Hans Hayden, Tim Hiller, Janet Hohmann, Pat Matthews, David McCullough, Glenn McDonald, Jamie McFadden, Kendrick Moholt, Mark Penninger, Jens Persson, Lynne Price, Brian Ratliff, Jamie Ratliff, John Stephenson, John Wyanens, Rebecca Watters, Russ Westlake, and Jeff Yanke.
  • Volcanic Vistas Discover National Forests in Central Oregon Summer 2009 Celebrating the Re-Opening of Lava Lands Visitor Center Inside

    Volcanic Vistas Discover National Forests in Central Oregon Summer 2009 Celebrating the Re-Opening of Lava Lands Visitor Center Inside

    Volcanic Vistas Discover National Forests in Central Oregon Summer 2009 Celebrating the re-opening of Lava Lands Visitor Center Inside.... Be Safe! 2 LAWRENCE A. CHITWOOD Go To Special Places 3 EXHIBIT HALL Lava Lands Visitor Center 4-5 DEDICATED MAY 30, 2009 Experience Today 6 For a Better Tomorrow 7 The Exhibit Hall at Lava Lands Visitor Center is dedicated in memory of Explore Newberry Volcano 8-9 Larry Chitwood with deep gratitude for his significant contributions enlightening many students of the landscape now and in the future. Forest Restoration 10 Discover the Natural World 11-13 Lawrence A. Chitwood Discovery in the Kids Corner 14 (August 4, 1942 - January 4, 2008) Take the Road Less Traveled 15 Larry was a geologist for the Deschutes National Forest from 1972 until his Get High on Nature 16 retirement in June 2007. Larry was deeply involved in the creation of Newberry National Volcanic Monument and with the exhibits dedicated in 2009 at Lava Lands What's Your Interest? Visitor Center. He was well known throughout the The Deschutes and Ochoco National Forests are a recre- geologic and scientific communities for his enthusiastic support for those wishing ation haven. There are 2.5 million acres of forest including to learn more about Central Oregon. seven wilderness areas comprising 200,000 acres, six rivers, Larry was a gifted storyteller and an ever- 157 lakes and reservoirs, approximately 1,600 miles of trails, flowing source of knowledge. Lava Lands Visitor Center and the unique landscape of Newberry National Volcanic Monument. Explore snow- capped mountains or splash through whitewater rapids; there is something for everyone.
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement

    Final Environmental Impact Statement

    United States Department of Agriculture Final Forest Service July 2003 Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision Metolius Basin Forest Management Project Sisters Ranger District, Deschutes National Forest Jefferson County, Oregon The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion. age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Metolius Basin Forest Management Project Final Environmental Impact Statement METOLIUS BASIN FOREST MANAGEMENT PROJECT Final Environmental Impact Statement Jefferson County, Oregon Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible Official: Leslie Weldon Deschutes National Forest 1645 Highway 20 E Bend, OR 97701 For Information Contact: Kris Martinson, Project Leader Sisters Ranger District P.O. Box 249 Sisters, OR 97759 541-549-7730 Abstract: The USDA Forest Service is proposing to implement fuel reduction and forest health management activities in order to meet the goals of reducing the risk of catastrophic wildfire, insect or disease events in the project area; protecting people, property and tribal and natural resource values; restoring old-growth forests, and protecting water and soil quality.
  • State Highway Department

    State Highway Department

    Description of WOrk of the State Highway Department in the Counties of the State 1923 -1924 BAKER COUNTY There was less activity in highway constructjon in Baker County dur- ing the biennium just past than in previousyears. However, the main trunk line highway known as the Old Oregon Trailwas completed during this period, and some work was doneon the Baker-Cornucopia and the Baker-Unity Highways. The work on the Baker-Cornucopia Highway involved theconstruction of the grade down the Powder River Canyon, which eliminated the high Sparta summit and materially improved existing communicationbetween the Eagle and Pine Valleys and Baker.However, there still remains a very bad section between Middle Bridge and Love Bridge, and the section between Black Bridge and Richland, through the Dry Gulch country, is impassable to automobile traffic during the spring of theyear. On the Baker-Unity Highway the gradeon both sides of Dooley Moun- tain was completed. Those who were forced to travel the old mountain grade, which was narrow, crooked, and in places reacheda gradient of 22 per cent, will appreciate traveling over thenew highway now open to traffic. The total length of grading completed in Baker County during the past biennium was 18.11 miles, of which 8.95 mileswere surfaced. in addition to this work there were 25.90 miles surveyed. The Baker County bond issue of 1918, amounting to $500,000,was in- sufficient to meet the State in cooperating to complete the state highways through the county, and on November 4, 1924,an additional $500,00G was voted to complete the Baker-Cornucopia and the Baker-Unity High- ways.