Contested Knowledges Water Conflicts on Large Dams and Mega- Hydraulic Development

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Contested Knowledges Water Conflicts on Large Dams and Mega- Hydraulic Development Contested Knowledges Water Conflicts on Large Dams and Mega- Hydraulic Development Edited by Esha Shah, Rutgerd Boelens and Bert Bruins Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Water www.mdpi.com/journal/water Contested Knowledges Contested Knowledges: Water Conflicts on Large Dams and Mega-Hydraulic Development Special Issue Editors Esha Shah Rutgerd Boelens Bert Bruins MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade Special Issue Editors Esha Shah Rutgerd Boelens Wageningen University Wageningen University The Netherlands The Netherlands Bert Bruins Wageningen University The Netherlands Editorial Office MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 4052 Basel, Switzerland This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal Water (ISSN 2073-4441) in 2019 (available at: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/water/special issues/ Water-Conflicts) For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Article Number, Page Range. ISBN 978-3-03897-810-7 (Pbk) ISBN 978-3-03897-811-4 (PDF) Cover image courtesy of Juan Pablo Hidalgo Bastidas, CEDLA, University of Amsterdam. c 2019 by the authors. Articles in this book are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book as a whole is distributed by MDPI under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND. Contents About the Special Issue Editors ..................................... vii Preface to ”Contested Knowledges: Water Conflicts on Large Dams and Mega- Hydraulic Development” ................................................ ix Rutgerd Boelens, Esha Shah and Bert Bruins Contested Knowledges: Large Dams and Mega-Hydraulic Development Reprinted from: Water 2019, 11, 416, doi:10.3390/w11030416 ..................... 1 Karen Bakker and Richard Hendriks Contested Knowledges in Hydroelectric Project Assessment: The Case of Canada’s Site C Project Reprinted from: Water 2019, 11, 406, doi:10.3390/w11030406 ..................... 28 Barbara Deutsch Lynch What Hirschman’s Hiding Hand Hid in San Lorenzo and Chixoy Reprinted from: Water 2019, 11, 415, doi:10.3390/w11030415 ..................... 46 Amelie Huber Hydropower in the Himalayan Hazardscape: Strategic Ignorance and the Production of Unequal Risk Reprinted from: Water 2019, 11, 414, doi:10.3390/w11030414 ..................... 64 Tuula Ter¨av¨ainen Negotiating Water and Technology—Competing Expectations and Confronting Knowledges in the Case of the Coca Codo Sinclair in Ecuador Reprinted from: Water 2019, 11, 411, doi:10.3390/w11030411 ..................... 87 Jeroen Warner, Sarunas Jomantas, Eliot Jones, Md. Sazzad Ansari and Lotje de Vries The Fantasy of the Grand Inga Hydroelectric Project on the River Congo Reprinted from: Water 2019, 11, 407, doi:10.3390/w11030406 .....................105 Coleen A. Fox and Christopher S. Sneddon Political Borders, Epistemological Boundaries, and Contested Knowledges: Constructing Dams and Narratives in the Mekong River Basin Reprinted from: Water 2019, 11, 413, doi:10.3390/w11030413 .....................119 Paul Hoogendam and Rutgerd Boelens Dams and Damages. Conflicting Epistemological Frameworks and Interests Concerning “Compensation” for the Misicuni Project’s Socio-Environmental Impacts in Cochabamba, Bolivia Reprinted from: Water 2019, 11, 408, doi:10.3390/w11030408 .....................137 Rinchu Doma Dukpa, Deepa Joshi and Rutgerd Boelens Contesting Hydropower Dams in the Eastern Himalaya: The Cultural Politics of Identity, Territory and Self-Governance Institutions in Sikkim, India Reprinted from: Water 2019, 11, 412, doi:10.3390/w11030412 .....................157 Juan Pablo Hidalgo-Bastidas and Rutgerd Boelens Hydraulic Order and the Politics of the Governed: The Baba Dam in Coastal Ecuador Reprinted from: Water 2019, 11, 409, doi:10.3390/w11030409 .....................180 v Bibiana Duarte Abad´ıa, Rutgerd Boelens and Lucas du Pr´e Mobilizing Water Actors and Bodies of Knowledge. The Multi-Scalar Movement against the R´ıo Grande Dam in Malaga,´ Spain Reprinted from: Water 2019, 11, 410, doi:10.3390/w11030410 .....................200 Esha Shah, Rutgerd Boelens and Bert Bruins Reflections: Contested Epistemologies on Large Dams and Mega-Hydraulic Development Reprinted from: Water 2019, 11, 417, doi:10.3390/w11030417 .....................221 vi About the Special Issue Editors Esha Shah is an Assistant Professor with the Water Resource Management Group at Wageningen University. She has held research and teaching positions at the Institute of Social and Economic Change (ISEC) in Bangalore, Institute of Development Studies (IDS) at University of Sussex, UK, and Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Maastricht University, the Netherlands. Between 2013 and 2015, she was a fellow at the Indian Institute of Advanced Study in Shimla. For 9 months, between October 2017 and October 2018, she was a fellow with the Nantes Institute of Advanced Study in Nantes, France. Her research interests include history and anthropology of science and technology, including water control infrastructure, debates on modernity and agrarian development in India, history and genealogy of development co-operation, debates on genetically modified crop biotechnology and, more recently, the role of subjectivity in shaping objective knowledge. https://www.wur.nl/en/Persons/Esha-E-Esha-Shah-PhD.htm https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Esha Shah6. Rutgerd Boelens is a Professor of ‘Water Governance and Social Justice’ at Wageningen University, a Professor of ‘Political Ecology of Water in Latin America’ with CEDLA, University of Amsterdam, and a Visiting Professor at the Catholic University of Peru and the Central University of Ecuador. He directs the international Justicia H´ıdrica/Water Justice alliance (www.justiciahidrica.org). His research focuses on political ecology, water rights, legal pluralism, cultural politics, governmentality and social mobilisation. Among his latest books are “Water Justice” (with Perreault & Vos, Cambridge University Press, 2018), “Water, Power and Identity. The Cultural Politics of Water in the Andes” (Routledge, 2015) and “Out of the Mainstream: Water Rights, Politics and Identity” (with Getches & Guevara-Gil, Earthscan, 2010). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rutgerd Boelens/publications and http://www.cedla.uva.nl/20 research/researchers/pub list/Rutgerd Boelens pub.html. Bert Bruins is is a lecturer at the Water Resources Management group of Wageningen University. In addition to teaching, he was involved in a research program entitled ‘Hydropower development in the context of climate change—Exploring conflicts and fostering cooperation across scales and boundaries in the Eastern Himalayas’ and in various higher education capacity building projects (in Bangladesh, Benin, Ethiopia and Nepal). He is also the Programme Director of the BSc and MSc programmes on International Land and Water Management at Wageningen University. vii Preface to ”Contested Knowledges: Water Conflicts on Large Dams and Mega- Hydraulic Development” Since the early 1980s, large dams have been at the centre of intensely contentious debates regarding their profound social and environmental impacts. All over the world, the design, construction and operation of large dams are amongst the most prestigious, but also the most sensitive and contested, developmental issues. As a result of the long-fraught conflict and controversy regarding large dams, which has spanned over two decades, the World Commission on Dams (WCD) was constituted. In 2000, it published its renowned report Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making. The WCD is an independent, international commission comprised of leaders from all sides of the debate; it has proposed guidelines for improving dam performance and governance by incorporating principles of participation, equity and transparency. The WCD has, so far, conducted the most rigorous evaluation of the role and impact of large dams on society and the environment, and its formation was accompanied by hopes that broad-based agreements would be forged to control the adverse effects of large dams on society and the environment. Despite the WCD process, the issue of large dams continues to remain highly contentious with respect to the conflict over providing hydropower, irrigation and flood control to limited segments of society while devastating the basic rights and livelihoods of many others and damaging shared rivers and ecosystems. More recently, the debates on climate change, increasing energy demand and challenges to the use of fossil fuels have prompted a renewed interest in hydropower, which is increasingly promoted as a source of clean energy. In addition, traditional development banks and developers have been steadily challenged by competitors from the private sector and the Capital invested by rising and powerful economies, such as China, for positions as primary investors in large dams in Africa and Latin America. These private actors barely follow the WCD guidelines and have adopted aggressively competitive approaches to investment in large dams, often in combination with the goal of strengthening their interests in extractive industries, such
Recommended publications
  • Grand Inga Hydroelectric Project: an Overview | International Rivers 4/5/18, 10:06 AM Grand Inga Hydroelectric Project: an Overview
    Grand Inga Hydroelectric Project: An Overview | International Rivers 4/5/18, 10:06 AM Grand Inga Hydroelectric Project: An Overview The Grand Inga is the world’s largest proposed hydropower scheme. It is the centerpiece of a grand vision to develop a continent-wide power system. The Grand Inga mega-project is a priority project for a number of Africa development organizations, including the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD), the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC), East African Power Pool (EAPP) and ESKOM, Africa’s largest power utility, among others. The proposed dam is the fourth and largest of a series of dams that have been built or are proposed for the lower end of the Congo River in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Grand Inga will generate 40, 000 MW, and will be constructed in 6 phases of which the Inga III Dam is the first phase. The power generated would be double the capacity of the largest dam in the world, the Three Gorges Dam in China. Where is it? The Inga dams are located in western Democratic Republic of the Congo, 50 km upstream of the mouth of the Congo River, and 225 km (140 miles) south west of Kinshasa on the Congo River. The Congo River is the world’s second largest in terms of flow (42,000m3/s), after the Amazon, and the second longest river in Africa (4,700km), after the Nile River. It empties into the equatorial Atlantic Ocean creating what is famously known as the Congo Plume. The plume is a high productivity area arising from the rich nutrient flow from the river and is detected as far as 800km offshore.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grand Inga Dam
    THE GRAND INGA DAM The mighty Congo River drains half of central Africa, but curves around, avoiding major falls along its whole length except, as it is about to enter the Atlantic Ocean. And this fall is very unimpressive, merely 96 meters, but it has a flow of 42,5 cubic meters per second. The Congo flows through a series of channels and cataracts before debouching. This is why The Congo is not navigable from the sea and actually poses difficult access to the hinterland, There is an unimpressive drop of some 300 feet, but it is the fact of the enormous flow-rate through turbines and powers the project. The Inga Dams, located in western Democratic Republic of the Congo 140 miles southwest of Kinshasa, are hydroelectric dams on the Inga falls. The Grand Inga Dam is a proposed dam, and is the fourth and largest of the Inga Dams, 8 km from Inga I dam, 7.3 km from Inga II, and 6.5 km from the proposed Inga III. The dam has an expected generating capacity of 39,000 Megawatts (MW), with 52 Turbines, each with a capacity of 750 MW This is a significantly larger capacity than the Three Gorges Dam, which is currently known as the largest energy-generating body ever built. I & II exist, but are small and are in need of rehabilitation. Inga III and Grand Inga are two massive new hydroelectric stations in the pipeline (forgive the pun). Projections indicate that Inga III would generate 4,000-5,000 MW of electricity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fantasy of the Grand Inga Hydroelectric Project on the River Congo
    water Article The Fantasy of the Grand Inga Hydroelectric Project on the River Congo Jeroen Warner *, Sarunas Jomantas, Eliot Jones, Md. Sazzad Ansari and Lotje de Vries Sociology of Development and Change, Social Sciences Group, Wageningen University, 6706KN Wageningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] (S.J.); [email protected] (E.J.); [email protected] (M.S.A.); [email protected] (L.d.V.) * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Received: 5 May 2018; Accepted: 3 January 2019; Published: 26 February 2019 Abstract: The Congo River is the deepest in the world and second-longest in Africa. Harnessing its full hydropower potential has been an ongoing development dream of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and its more powerful regional allies. If completed, the Grand Inga complex near Kinshasa, the capital of the DRC, will be the largest dam project in the world. Its eight separate dams (Inga 1–8) are envisioned to be “lighting up and powering Africa”. Opponents claim, however, that the rewards will be outsourced to corporate mining interests rather than meeting the needs of the local population, and that the project is flawed economically, socially and environmentally. The planned construction of the Inga dams and associated infrastructure has been stuck in limbo since it was mooted in the 1960s; a fantasy rather than a reality. This article attempts to analyse the rivalry underlying the Grand Inga scheme beyond the “pro” and “contra” reports. Embracing Lacanian psychoanalysis and triangulating multiple sources, we seek to unmask Grand Inga as a potent fantasy. Whilst exhibiting its purpose to serve as a screen to protect both proponents of and opponents to the dam from encountering their own self-deception, we conclude the scheme to be at its most powerful whilst the dream remains unfulfilled.
    [Show full text]
  • CASE STUDY to Be “Dam”-Ed: Navigating Stakeholder Relations to Bring F Energy to Africa with Inga 3 Kate Gasparro LAD
    LAD CASE STUDY To be “dam”-ed: Navigating Stakeholder Relations to Bring f Energy to Africa with Inga 3 Kate Gasparro LAD ABOUT LAD The Leadership Academy for Development (LAD) trains government officials and business leaders from developing countries to help the private sector be a constructive force for economic growth and development. It teaches carefully selected participants how to be effective reform leaders, promoting sound public policies in complex and contentious settings. LAD is a project of the Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law, part of Stanford University’s Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, and is conducted in partnership with the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. To be “dam”-ed: Navigating Stakeholder Relations to Bring Energy to Africa with Inga 3 Introduction In December 2013, Rajiv Shah, USAID administrator, visited the Inga 3 dam site in the Democratic Republic of Congo. His visit brought political and media attention to Africa’s greatest hope for clean hydropower and renewed hope for the African continent. Shortly thereafter, in March 2014, the World Bank and the African Development Bank took the first steps toward making the Inga 3 dam project a reality when they committed $73.1 million and $33.4 million,i respectively, for project technical assistance. Later that year, in August 2014, the United States held the first ever U.S.-Africa Leaders Summit in Washington, DC. Over the three- day meeting, African heads of state met with U.S. officials to discuss several issues, including trade, investment, security and democracy. At the conclusion of the Summit, American companies pledged $14 billion to spur development across Africa and President Obama spoke about increasing aid dollars to the continent.ii During the Summit, there was considerable discussion around using infrastructure development as a vehicle for progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo Has Tremendous Hydropower Potential
    FRIDAY, JUNE 24, 2016 After years of turmoil, a promising future BY TIM CASHION of 8.4 percent growth for 2015 makes the DRC the eighth fastest-growing economy in the world that year. or observers of the Democratic Repub- The World Bank’s assessment of DRC’s potential lic of the Congo there is rarely good echoes a common view. Indeed, the potential is there news. Headlines always seem to indi- for all to see: vast natural resources waiting to be cate the country is aflame with violent exploited. The country clearly has all the natural conflict, fueled by ruthless parties who see the DRC as a place to grab what you can and make a fortune in the process. But that is all changing. A fragile peace is tak- “With 80 million hectares of Fing hold in the troubled Eastern Congo, where the arable land and over 1,100 conflict has been centered, and the DRC has turned minerals and precious metals in a tremendous string of growing gross domestic product (GDP) figures for the past few years. identified, the DRC has the In its country overview, the World Bank says: potential to become one “With 80 million hectares of arable land and over of the richest countries on 1,100 minerals and precious metals identified, the DRC has the potential to become one of the richest the African continent and a countries on the African continent and a driver of driver of African growth.” African growth.” World Bank Country Overview The Bank goes on to say: “After an economic slump in 2009 that brought the growth rate down to 2.8 percent due to the global financial crisis, the ingredients for prosperity.
    [Show full text]