STUDY GUIDE: VECTOR CALCULUS 1. Glossary/Notation × = Vector

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

STUDY GUIDE: VECTOR CALCULUS 1. Glossary/Notation × = Vector STUDY GUIDE: VECTOR CALCULUS 1. Glossary/Notation × = vector cross product. If x1 = (x1; y1; z1); x2 = (x2; y2; z2), then the cross product is computed as the symbolic determinant 2 3 6 i j k 7 6 7 x1 × x2 = det 6 x1 y1 z1 7 : 46 57 x2 y2 z2 The cross product produces a vector perpendicular to both x1 and x2: ———————————————————————————————— · = scalar (“dot”) product. If x1 = (x1; y1; z1); x2 = (x2; y2; z2), then x1 · x2 = x1 x2 + y1y2 + z1z2: The dot product measures the angle θ between the two vectors: x · x 1 2 = cos θ: jx1j jx2j In particular, if the vectors are orthogonal, then their dot product is 0. ————————————————————————————————- coordinates and components/projections. If u is a unit vector, and x is an arbitrary vector, then the coordinate (aka “scalar component” or “scalar projection”) of x in the direction of u is compux = x · u: The projection of x in the direction of u, aka the vector projection of x onto u is projux = (x · u) u: The vector projection of x perpendicular to u (aka “orthogonal projec- tion”) is orthux = x − (x · u) u: ————————————————————————————————- 1 2 STUDY GUIDE: VECTOR CALCULUS magnitude and distance The magnitude (aka “length”) of a vector x = (x; y; z) is q jxj = x2 + y2 + z2; similarly in 2-D. The distance between two vectors x1 = (x1; y1; z1) and x2 = (x2; y2; z2) is the magnitude of the vector x1 − x2, i.e., q 2 2 2 dist(x1; x2) = jx1 − x2j = (x1 − x2) + (y1 − y2) + (z1 − z2) : ———————————————————————————————— @ @ @ r = @x ; @y ; @z = gradient. For a function f (x; y; z), we have ! @ f @ f @ f r f = ; ; = f ; f ; f ; @x @y @z x y z similarly in 2-D. ———————————————————————————————— r · = divergence. For a vector-valued function F = (P; Q; R), we have @P @Q @R r · F = div F = + + = P + Q + R ; @x @y @z x y z similarly in 2-D. ———————————————————————————————— r × = curl. For a vector valued function in 3-D, F = (P; Q; R)), we have 2 i j k 3 6 7 curl F = r × F = det 6 @ @ @ 7 : 6 @x @y @z 7 4 PQR 5 For a 2-D vector field F = (P; Q); the curl is simpler: @Q @P curl F = − : @x @y ———————————————————————————————— directional derivative. If u is a unit vector, then the directional derivative in the direction of u equals @ f = u · r f: @u Remark: the unit vector u may be constant, or it may be a variable vector field (i.e., which changes from point to point). For example, if n is the outer unit normal to a closed orientable surface S , then the “outer normal derivative” is @ f = n · r f: @n ———————————————————————————————— STUDY GUIDE: VECTOR CALCULUS 3 Chain Rule. Let f (x; y; z) 2 C1. Set r(u; v) = (x(u; v); y(u; v); z(u; v). Then @ f (r(u; v)) @r @ f (r(u; v)) @r = r f (r(u; v)) · ; = r f (r(u; v)) · : @u @u @v @v If r(t) = (x(t); y(t); z(t)is a parametrized curve, then d f (r(t)) dr = r f (r(t)) · : dt dt ———————————————————————————————— Derivative matrix and Jacobian • If f (x1; x2; :::; xn) = f1(x1; x2; :::; xn); f2(x1; x2; :::; xn); :::; fm(x1; x2; :::; xn) is a vector valued function from Rn ! Rm, then its derivative matrix is 2 @ f1 @ f1 @ f1 3 6 ::: 7 6 @x1 @x2 @xn 7 6 7 6 @ f @ f @ f 7 0 6 2 2 ::: 2 7 f (x) = 6 @x1 @x2 @xn 7 : 6 : : : 7 6 : : ::: : 7 6 7 4 @ fm @ fm ::: @ fm 5 @x1 @x2 @xn • If m = 1, then ! @ f @ f @ f f 0 = r f = ; ; :::; @x1 @x2 @xn is the usual gradient. In this case we say that f is differentiable at a given point x0 if f (x) − f (x ) − r f (x ) · (x − x ) lim 0 0 0 = 0: x!x0 jx − x0j • If n = m, then the derivative matrix f 0 is sometimes called the Jacobian ma- trix; the absolute value of its determinant is called the Jacobian. For example, if f (r; θ) = (r cos θ; r sin θ) is the co-ordinate transformation for polar co-ordinates, which we may also write as a column vector " # " # x r cos θ = ; y r sin θ then the Jacobian equals 2 @x @x 3 " # 6 7 cos θ −r sin θ det 6 @r ∂θ 7 = det = r: 46 @y @y 57 sin θ r cos θ @r ∂θ Thus when changing to polar co-ordinates in 2-D integrals, we have dx dy = r dr dθ: Similarly for 3-D spherical co-ordinates 2 x 3 2 ρ cos θ sin φ 3 6 7 6 7 6 y 7 = 6 ρ sin θ sin φ 7 ; 6 7 6 7 4 z 5 4 ρ cos φ 5 we may compute the Jacobian as ρ2 sin φ, so dx dy dz = ρ2 sin φ dρ dφ dθ: 4 STUDY GUIDE: VECTOR CALCULUS ds = arclength differential. For a parametric curve x(t) = (x(t); y(t); z(t)), we have q ds = (x0(t))2 + (y0(t))2 + (z0(t))2 dt q (or ds = (x0(t))2 + (y0(t))2 dt for a curve in 2-D). In the special case that the curve is a graph y = f (x), in 2-D, then the parametrization is x(x) = (x; f (x)) (or, if you prefer, x(t) = (t; f (t))) and q q ds = 1 + ( f 0(x))2 dx or ds = 1 + ( f 0(t))2 dt: ———————————————————————————————— dσ = surface area differential. For a parametrized surface r(u; v) = (x(u; v); y(u; v); z(u; v), we have @r @r dσ = × dudv: @u @v In the special case that the surface is a graph z = f (x; y), then we have the parametrization r(x; y) = (x; y; f (x; y)), and in this case q q 2 2 2 dσ = 1 + jr f (x; y)j dxdy = 1 + ( fx) + ( fy) dxdy: Remark: The textbook uses the notation dS in place of dσ. ———————————————————————————————— dS = n dσ = vector surface differerential Let r(u; v) = (x(u; v); y(u; v); z(u; v) be a parametrization of an orientable surface S . Then the vectors @r=@u and @r=@v are tangent to the surface, so @r @r that the cross product @u × @v is perpendicular to the surface. The vector surface differential is ! @r @r dS = n dσ = ± × dudv ; @u @v where n denotes a fixed choice of unit normal to the surface S . Here, ± is chosen depending on orientation. For example, if S is a closed surface @r @r (i.e., it encloses some 3-D region), and if @u × @v points outward, then @r × @r n = @u @v @r @r @u × @v is the outward unit normal, so if S has positive (i.e., outward) orientation, then @r @r ! @u × @v @r @r @r @r n dσ = × dudv = × dudv = dS: @r @r @u @v @u @v @u × @v ———————————————————————————————— @R = boundary of R. E.g., if R is the ball x2 + y2 + z2 ≤ 9, then @R is the sphere x2 + y2 + z2 = 9. ———————————————————————————————— STUDY GUIDE: VECTOR CALCULUS 5 2. Max-Min 2.1. Unconstrained Max-Min’s in 2D. Suppose that f (x; y) 2 C2 has a critical point at (x0; y0); i.e., r f (x0; y0) = 0: Consider the quantity 2 D = fxx fyy − fxy : The following “2nd derivative test” holds: • If D(x0; y0) > 0 and fxx(x0; y0) > 0, then f has a local min at (x0; y0): • If D(x0; y0) > 0 and fxx(x0; y0) < 0, then f has a local max at (x0; y0): • If D(x0; y0) < 0, then f has a saddle point at (x0; y0): • If D(x0; y0) = 0, the test is inconclusive. ———————————————————————————————— 2.2. Constrained Max-Min’s - Lagrange Multipliers. Consider f (x; y; z) subject to the constraint g(x; y; z) = k. The constrained extreme values of f can only occur where (x; y; z; λ) solves the system of equations (1) r f (x; y; z) = λrg(x; y; z); g(x; y; z) = k: In the case of multiple constraints g1(x; y; z) = k1; :::; gm(x; y; z) = km, one should solve the system (2) r f = λ1rg1 + ::: + λmrgm; g1(x; y; z) = k1; :::; gm(x; y; z) = km: NOTE: In principle, the Lagrange method only produces critical points, but often some ad hoc reasoning will allow one to determine whether the solution of the systems (1) or (2) does in fact yield a max or min. ———————————————————————————————— 3. Planes, Tangent Planes 3.1. Planes. The equation of the plane through the point x0, and perpendicular to a vector P is given by (3) P · (x − x0) = 0: Notice that this can also be written as P · x − c0 = 0; or P · x = c0; where c0 = P · x0: For example, 3x − 2y + 4z = 10 is the equation of a plane with perpendicular vector P = (3; −2; 4), because it can be re- written as (3; −2; 4) · (x; y; z) = 10: Sometimes it is convenient to normalize so that the perpendicular to the plane is a unit normal; e.g., for the previous plane, the magnitude of p p p (3; −2; 4) = 32 + (−2)2 + 42 = 9 + 4 + 16 = 30: 6 STUDY GUIDE: VECTOR CALCULUS Therefore, the unit normal n = p3 ; p−2 ; p4 ; so the plane can be re-written in normal- 30 30 30 ized form as ! 3 −2 4 10 (4) p ; p ; p · (x; y; z) = p : 30 30 30 30 ———————————————————————————————— 3.2.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 11. Three Dimensional Analytic Geometry and Vectors
    Chapter 11. Three dimensional analytic geometry and vectors. Section 11.5 Quadric surfaces. Curves in R2 : x2 y2 ellipse + =1 a2 b2 x2 y2 hyperbola − =1 a2 b2 parabola y = ax2 or x = by2 A quadric surface is the graph of a second degree equation in three variables. The most general such equation is Ax2 + By2 + Cz2 + Dxy + Exz + F yz + Gx + Hy + Iz + J =0, where A, B, C, ..., J are constants. By translation and rotation the equation can be brought into one of two standard forms Ax2 + By2 + Cz2 + J =0 or Ax2 + By2 + Iz =0 In order to sketch the graph of a quadric surface, it is useful to determine the curves of intersection of the surface with planes parallel to the coordinate planes. These curves are called traces of the surface. Ellipsoids The quadric surface with equation x2 y2 z2 + + =1 a2 b2 c2 is called an ellipsoid because all of its traces are ellipses. 2 1 x y 3 2 1 z ±1 ±2 ±3 ±1 ±2 The six intercepts of the ellipsoid are (±a, 0, 0), (0, ±b, 0), and (0, 0, ±c) and the ellipsoid lies in the box |x| ≤ a, |y| ≤ b, |z| ≤ c Since the ellipsoid involves only even powers of x, y, and z, the ellipsoid is symmetric with respect to each coordinate plane. Example 1. Find the traces of the surface 4x2 +9y2 + 36z2 = 36 1 in the planes x = k, y = k, and z = k. Identify the surface and sketch it. Hyperboloids Hyperboloid of one sheet. The quadric surface with equations x2 y2 z2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Topology the Classification Theorem for Surfaces by E
    An Introduction to Topology An Introduction to Topology The Classification theorem for Surfaces By E. C. Zeeman Introduction. The classification theorem is a beautiful example of geometric topology. Although it was discovered in the last century*, yet it manages to convey the spirit of present day research. The proof that we give here is elementary, and its is hoped more intuitive than that found in most textbooks, but in none the less rigorous. It is designed for readers who have never done any topology before. It is the sort of mathematics that could be taught in schools both to foster geometric intuition, and to counteract the present day alarming tendency to drop geometry. It is profound, and yet preserves a sense of fun. In Appendix 1 we explain how a deeper result can be proved if one has available the more sophisticated tools of analytic topology and algebraic topology. Examples. Before starting the theorem let us look at a few examples of surfaces. In any branch of mathematics it is always a good thing to start with examples, because they are the source of our intuition. All the following pictures are of surfaces in 3-dimensions. In example 1 by the word “sphere” we mean just the surface of the sphere, and not the inside. In fact in all the examples we mean just the surface and not the solid inside. 1. Sphere. 2. Torus (or inner tube). 3. Knotted torus. 4. Sphere with knotted torus bored through it. * Zeeman wrote this article in the mid-twentieth century. 1 An Introduction to Topology 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 2.6 Cylindrical and Spherical Coordinates
    Section 2.6 Cylindrical and Spherical Coordinates A) Review on the Polar Coordinates The polar coordinate system consists of the origin O,the rotating ray or half line from O with unit tick. A point P in the plane can be uniquely described by its distance to the origin r = dist (P, O) and the angle µ, 0 µ < 2¼ : · Y P(x,y) r θ O X We call (r, µ) the polar coordinate of P. Suppose that P has Cartesian (stan- dard rectangular) coordinate (x, y) .Then the relation between two coordinate systems is displayed through the following conversion formula: x = r cos µ Polar Coord. to Cartesian Coord.: y = r sin µ ½ r = x2 + y2 Cartesian Coord. to Polar Coord.: y tan µ = ( p x 0 µ < ¼ if y > 0, 2¼ µ < ¼ if y 0. · · · Note that function tan µ has period ¼, and the principal value for inverse tangent function is ¼ y ¼ < arctan < . ¡ 2 x 2 1 So the angle should be determined by y arctan , if x > 0 xy 8 arctan + ¼, if x < 0 µ = > ¼ x > > , if x = 0, y > 0 < 2 ¼ , if x = 0, y < 0 > ¡ 2 > > Example 6.1. Fin:>d (a) Cartesian Coord. of P whose Polar Coord. is ¼ 2, , and (b) Polar Coord. of Q whose Cartesian Coord. is ( 1, 1) . 3 ¡ ¡ ³ So´l. (a) ¼ x = 2 cos = 1, 3 ¼ y = 2 sin = p3. 3 (b) r = p1 + 1 = p2 1 ¼ ¼ 5¼ tan µ = ¡ = 1 = µ = or µ = + ¼ = . 1 ) 4 4 4 ¡ 5¼ Since ( 1, 1) is in the third quadrant, we choose µ = so ¡ ¡ 4 5¼ p2, is Polar Coord.
    [Show full text]
  • Area, Volume and Surface Area
    The Improving Mathematics Education in Schools (TIMES) Project MEASUREMENT AND GEOMETRY Module 11 AREA, VOLUME AND SURFACE AREA A guide for teachers - Years 8–10 June 2011 YEARS 810 Area, Volume and Surface Area (Measurement and Geometry: Module 11) For teachers of Primary and Secondary Mathematics 510 Cover design, Layout design and Typesetting by Claire Ho The Improving Mathematics Education in Schools (TIMES) Project 2009‑2011 was funded by the Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. The views expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. © The University of Melbourne on behalf of the international Centre of Excellence for Education in Mathematics (ICE‑EM), the education division of the Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute (AMSI), 2010 (except where otherwise indicated). This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution‑NonCommercial‑NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by‑nc‑nd/3.0/ The Improving Mathematics Education in Schools (TIMES) Project MEASUREMENT AND GEOMETRY Module 11 AREA, VOLUME AND SURFACE AREA A guide for teachers - Years 8–10 June 2011 Peter Brown Michael Evans David Hunt Janine McIntosh Bill Pender Jacqui Ramagge YEARS 810 {4} A guide for teachers AREA, VOLUME AND SURFACE AREA ASSUMED KNOWLEDGE • Knowledge of the areas of rectangles, triangles, circles and composite figures. • The definitions of a parallelogram and a rhombus. • Familiarity with the basic properties of parallel lines. • Familiarity with the volume of a rectangular prism. • Basic knowledge of congruence and similarity. • Since some formulas will be involved, the students will need some experience with substitution and also with the distributive law.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Curl and Divergence
    Sections 15.5-15.8: Divergence, Curl, Surface Integrals, Stokes' and Divergence Theorems Reeve Garrett 1 Curl and Divergence Definition 1.1 Let F = hf; g; hi be a differentiable vector field defined on a region D of R3. Then, the divergence of F on D is @ @ @ div F := r · F = ; ; · hf; g; hi = f + g + h ; @x @y @z x y z @ @ @ where r = h @x ; @y ; @z i is the del operator. If div F = 0, we say that F is source free. Note that these definitions (divergence and source free) completely agrees with their 2D analogues in 15.4. Theorem 1.2 Suppose that F is a radial vector field, i.e. if r = hx; y; zi, then for some real number p, r hx;y;zi 3−p F = jrjp = (x2+y2+z2)p=2 , then div F = jrjp . Theorem 1.3 Let F = hf; g; hi be a differentiable vector field defined on a region D of R3. Then, the curl of F on D is curl F := r × F = hhy − gz; fz − hx; gx − fyi: If curl F = 0, then we say F is irrotational. Note that gx − fy is the 2D curl as defined in section 15.4. Therefore, if we fix a point (a; b; c), [gx − fy](a; b; c), measures the rotation of F at the point (a; b; c) in the plane z = c. Similarly, [hy − gz](a; b; c) measures the rotation of F in the plane x = a at (a; b; c), and [fz − hx](a; b; c) measures the rotation of F in the plane y = b at the point (a; b; c).
    [Show full text]
  • Curl, Divergence and Laplacian
    Curl, Divergence and Laplacian What to know: 1. The definition of curl and it two properties, that is, theorem 1, and be able to predict qualitatively how the curl of a vector field behaves from a picture. 2. The definition of divergence and it two properties, that is, if div F~ 6= 0 then F~ can't be written as the curl of another field, and be able to tell a vector field of clearly nonzero,positive or negative divergence from the picture. 3. Know the definition of the Laplace operator 4. Know what kind of objects those operator take as input and what they give as output. The curl operator Let's look at two plots of vector fields: Figure 1: The vector field Figure 2: The vector field h−y; x; 0i: h1; 1; 0i We can observe that the second one looks like it is rotating around the z axis. We'd like to be able to predict this kind of behavior without having to look at a picture. We also promised to find a criterion that checks whether a vector field is conservative in R3. Both of those goals are accomplished using a tool called the curl operator, even though neither of those two properties is exactly obvious from the definition we'll give. Definition 1. Let F~ = hP; Q; Ri be a vector field in R3, where P , Q and R are continuously differentiable. We define the curl operator: @R @Q @P @R @Q @P curl F~ = − ~i + − ~j + − ~k: (1) @y @z @z @x @x @y Remarks: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Analytic Geometry
    STATISTIC ANALYTIC GEOMETRY SESSION 3 STATISTIC SESSION 3 Session 3 Analytic Geometry Geometry is all about shapes and their properties. If you like playing with objects, or like drawing, then geometry is for you! Geometry can be divided into: Plane Geometry is about flat shapes like lines, circles and triangles ... shapes that can be drawn on a piece of paper Solid Geometry is about three dimensional objects like cubes, prisms, cylinders and spheres Point, Line, Plane and Solid A Point has no dimensions, only position A Line is one-dimensional A Plane is two dimensional (2D) A Solid is three-dimensional (3D) Plane Geometry Plane Geometry is all about shapes on a flat surface (like on an endless piece of paper). 2D Shapes Activity: Sorting Shapes Triangles Right Angled Triangles Interactive Triangles Quadrilaterals (Rhombus, Parallelogram, etc) Rectangle, Rhombus, Square, Parallelogram, Trapezoid and Kite Interactive Quadrilaterals Shapes Freeplay Perimeter Area Area of Plane Shapes Area Calculation Tool Area of Polygon by Drawing Activity: Garden Area General Drawing Tool Polygons A Polygon is a 2-dimensional shape made of straight lines. Triangles and Rectangles are polygons. Here are some more: Pentagon Pentagra m Hexagon Properties of Regular Polygons Diagonals of Polygons Interactive Polygons The Circle Circle Pi Circle Sector and Segment Circle Area by Sectors Annulus Activity: Dropping a Coin onto a Grid Circle Theorems (Advanced Topic) Symbols There are many special symbols used in Geometry. Here is a short reference for you:
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Topology
    2 Surface topology 2.1 Classification of surfaces In this second introductory chapter, we change direction completely. We dis- cuss the topological classification of surfaces, and outline one approach to a proof. Our treatment here is almost entirely informal; we do not even define precisely what we mean by a ‘surface’. (Definitions will be found in the following chapter.) However, with the aid of some more sophisticated technical language, it not too hard to turn our informal account into a precise proof. The reasons for including this material here are, first, that it gives a counterweight to the previous chapter: the two together illustrate two themes—complex analysis and topology—which run through the study of Riemann surfaces. And, second, that we are able to introduce some more advanced ideas that will be taken up later in the book. The statement of the classification of closed surfaces is probably well known to many readers. We write down two families of surfaces g, h for integers g ≥ 0, h ≥ 1. 2 2 The surface 0 is the 2-sphere S . The surface 1 is the 2-torus T .For g ≥ 2, we define the surface g by taking the ‘connected sum’ of g copies of the torus. In general, if X and Y are (connected) surfaces, the connected sum XY is a surface constructed as follows (Figure 2.1). We choose small discs DX in X and DY in Y and cut them out to get a pair of ‘surfaces-with- boundaries’, coresponding to the circle boundaries of DX and DY.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculus Terminology
    AP Calculus BC Calculus Terminology Absolute Convergence Asymptote Continued Sum Absolute Maximum Average Rate of Change Continuous Function Absolute Minimum Average Value of a Function Continuously Differentiable Function Absolutely Convergent Axis of Rotation Converge Acceleration Boundary Value Problem Converge Absolutely Alternating Series Bounded Function Converge Conditionally Alternating Series Remainder Bounded Sequence Convergence Tests Alternating Series Test Bounds of Integration Convergent Sequence Analytic Methods Calculus Convergent Series Annulus Cartesian Form Critical Number Antiderivative of a Function Cavalieri’s Principle Critical Point Approximation by Differentials Center of Mass Formula Critical Value Arc Length of a Curve Centroid Curly d Area below a Curve Chain Rule Curve Area between Curves Comparison Test Curve Sketching Area of an Ellipse Concave Cusp Area of a Parabolic Segment Concave Down Cylindrical Shell Method Area under a Curve Concave Up Decreasing Function Area Using Parametric Equations Conditional Convergence Definite Integral Area Using Polar Coordinates Constant Term Definite Integral Rules Degenerate Divergent Series Function Operations Del Operator e Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Deleted Neighborhood Ellipsoid GLB Derivative End Behavior Global Maximum Derivative of a Power Series Essential Discontinuity Global Minimum Derivative Rules Explicit Differentiation Golden Spiral Difference Quotient Explicit Function Graphic Methods Differentiable Exponential Decay Greatest Lower Bound Differential
    [Show full text]
  • 10A– Three Generalizations of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus MATH 22C
    10A– Three Generalizations of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus MATH 22C 1. Introduction In the next four sections we present applications of the three generalizations of the Fundamental Theorem of Cal- culus (FTC) to three space dimensions (x, y, z) 3,a version associated with each of the three linear operators,2R the Gradient, the Curl and the Divergence. Since much of classical physics is framed in terms of these three gener- alizations of FTC, these operators are often referred to as the three linear first order operators of classical physics. The FTC in one dimension states that the integral of a function over a closed interval [a, b] is equal to its anti- derivative evaluated between the endpoints of the interval: b f 0(x)dx = f(b) f(a). − Za This generalizes to the following three versions of the FTC in two and three dimensions. The first states that the line integral of a gradient vector field F = f along a curve , (in physics the work done by F) is exactlyr equal to the changeC in its potential potential f across the endpoints A, B of : C F Tds= f(B) f(A). (1) · − ZC The second, called Stokes Theorem, says that the flux of the Curl of a vector field F through a two dimensional surface in 3 is the line integral of F around the curve that S R 1 C 2 bounds : S CurlF n dσ = F Tds (2) · · ZZS ZC And the third, called the Divergence Theorem, states that the integral of the Divergence of F over an enclosed vol- ume is equal to the flux of F outward through the two dimensionalV closed surface that bounds : S V DivF dV = F n dσ.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces 3
    DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY OF CURVES AND SURFACES 3. Regular Surfaces 3.1. The definition of a regular surface. Examples. The notion of surface we are going to deal with in our course can be intuitively understood as the object obtained by a potter full of phantasy who takes several pieces of clay, flatten them on a table, then models of each of them arbitrarily strange looking pots, and finally glue them together and flatten the possible edges and corners. The resulting object is, formally speaking, a subset of the three dimensional space R3. Here is the rigorous definition of a surface. Definition 3.1.1. A subset S ⊂ R3 is a1 regular surface if for any point P in S one can find an open subspace U ⊂ R2 and a map ϕ : U → S of the form ϕ(u, v)=(x(u, v),y(u, v), z(u, v)), for (u, v) ∈ U with the following properties: 1. The function ϕ is differentiable, in the sense that the components x(u, v), y(u, v) and z(u, v) have partial derivatives of any order. 2 3 2. For any Q in U, the differential map d(ϕ)Q : R → R is (linear and) injective. 3. There exists an open subspace V ⊂ R3 which contains P such that ϕ(U) = V ∩ S and moreover, ϕ : U → V ∩ S is a homeomorphism2. The pair (U, ϕ) is called a local parametrization, or a chart, or a local coordinate system around P . Conditions 1 and 2 say that (U, ϕ) is a regular patch.
    [Show full text]
  • Approaching Green's Theorem Via Riemann Sums
    APPROACHING GREEN’S THEOREM VIA RIEMANN SUMS JENNIE BUSKIN, PHILIP PROSAPIO, AND SCOTT A. TAYLOR ABSTRACT. We give a proof of Green’s theorem which captures the underlying intuition and which relies only on the mean value theorems for derivatives and integrals and on the change of variables theorem for double integrals. 1. INTRODUCTION The counterpoint of the discrete and continuous has been, perhaps even since Eu- clid, the essence of many mathematical fugues. Despite this, there are fundamental mathematical subjects where their voices are difficult to distinguish. For example, although early Calculus courses make much of the passage from the discrete world of average rate of change and Riemann sums to the continuous (or, more accurately, smooth) world of derivatives and integrals, by the time the student reaches the cen- tral material of vector calculus: scalar fields, vector fields, and their integrals over curves and surfaces, the voice of discrete mathematics has been obscured by the coloratura of continuous mathematics. Our aim in this article is to restore the bal- ance of the voices by showing how Green’s Theorem can be understood from the discrete point of view. Although Green’s Theorem admits many generalizations (the most important un- doubtedly being the Generalized Stokes’ Theorem from the theory of differentiable manifolds), we restrict ourselves to one of its simplest forms: Green’s Theorem. Let S ⊂ R2 be a compact surface bounded by (finitely many) simple closed piecewise C1 curves oriented so that S is on their left. Suppose that M F = is a C1 vector field defined on an open set U containing S.
    [Show full text]