DOCSLIB.ORG

Kendrick Shaun Edit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Diversity, Ecology & Recording of Lepidoptera . In brief. by Dr. Roger C. KENDRICK Director, C & R Wildlife, Hong Kong founder: Asian Lepidoptera Conservation Symposium Introduction to Lepidoptera • What is Lepidoptera (butterflies & moths) ? • Diversity • Survival Strategies • Ecological Services • Role in Wildlife Conservation • Introduction to Lepidoptera recording main unique field characters of butterflies and moths Lepidoptera = Greek for scale-winged 27 characters defining Lepidoptera: main ones on adult Lepidoptera are: - • Hairs on wing modified as scales; • Presence of haustellum (coiled proboscis – may be degenerate or lost in some taxa); • Presence of “vom Rath’s organ” in terminal segment of labial palp; • Fore tibia with movable “epiphysis” (antenna comb) on inner surface; • Median ocellus absent. Moth or Butterfly ? Not one character that is 100% definitive ! Guides….. Adult . Antennae; posture; wing coupling mechanism Pupa . Cocoon; cremaster; girdle Larva . Number of proleg pairs on abdomen (four or less) Daytime vs. nighttime & crepuscular . Lepidoptera Diversity • over 160,000 scientifically described species • 150,000 to 200,000 thought to be awaiting description or discovery! (mostly in the tropics) • many ecological niches and almost all terrestrial habitats occupied • many species / higher taxa specially adapted to particular ecological niche, thus good indicators of habitat change, environmental impact or “quality” Lepidoptera Phylogeny source: Mutanen et al., 2010 Diversity – Classification, name endings and rank • Superfamily - …….-oidea (e.g. Noctuoidea) • Family - ……..-idae (e.g. Erebidae) • Subfamily - ……..-inae (e.g. Boletobiinae) • Tribe - ……..-ini (e.g. Aventiini) • Genus, genera (gen., e.g. Laspeyria); subgenus (subgen.) • Species (sp., e.g. ruficeps, spp.) • Subspecies (ssp., sspp.) Diversity - Major Families (1) 58 “Microlepidoptera” families in HK, comprising >1,140 spp.; likely over 6,000 spp. in Malaysia and > 200,000 spp globally • Tineidae • Sesiidae • Gracillariidae • Zygaenidae • Yponomeutidae • Limacodidae • Oecophoridae • Thyrididae • Gelechiidae • Pyralidae • Tortricidae • Crambidae Diversity - Major Families (2 - butterflies) 6 “butterfly” families in Hong Kong, comprising about 250 spp; over 1,000 spp in Malaysia, about 25,000 species globally • Hesperiidae Skippers • Papilionidae Swallowtails • Pieridae Whites & Sulphurs • Lycaenidae Blues & Hairstreaks • Riodinidae Metalmarks • Nymphalidae Tigers, Crows, Nymphs, Browns, Fritillaries . Diversity - Major Families (3) 14 “Macrolepidoptera” families in Hong Kong comprising >1,260 spp; over 5,000 spp in Malaysia, perhaps 150,000 species globally • Saturniidae • Erebidae (inc. Arctiinae • Sphingidae & Lymantriinae ) • Geometridae • Nolidae • Notodontidae • Noctuidae Diversity – Comparison of Numbers of Species Globally – c. 160,000 described, a further 150,000 to 200,000 estimated Borneo – c. 4,500 “macro” + further 4,000 “micro” estimated GentinG Highlands, Malaysia – in excess of 6,000 species ! Fraser’s Hill, Malaysia – at least 3,000 moth species (in four years!) Taiwan – c. 4,000 recorded, addinG tens new to science most years United KinGdom – 2,500 species (just over 50 are butterfly species!), adding a few each year HonG KonG – c. 2,750 species recorded (~ 250 butterfly species); + 1,500 to 2,500 to find Survival Strategies – Adult Moths Mimicry plants & lichens: leaves, twigs, tree trunks, (colour and shape/posture) animals: mammal faces; snakes; unpalatable insects – spiders, wasps, Bees, poisonous moths & Butterflies; Bird droppings Survival Strategies – Adult Moths Sound detection of ultrasound to avoid bats; emitting sound to advertise unpalatability (Arctiinae) or pacify bees (Acherontia) Survival Strategies – Moth Larvae Mimicry plants & lichens: leaves, twigs, tree trunks, (colour and shape/posture) animals: snakes; bird droppings Survival Strategies – Moth Larvae Colour use of simple bold bright patterns to advertise unpalatability Concealment crypsis; leaf rolling; leaf mining; webs; stem borers; root feeders; nocturnal feeders Ecological Services Pollination Food resources Silk Nutrient Recycling Pest control Photo: Prof. R. Peigler Role of Lepidoptera in Wildlife Conservation high biodiversity, high relative abundance and relative ease of identification make moths: 1. a good group for monitoring effects of ecological processes and factors that affect these processes 2. indicate habitats and landscapes likely to be of high conservation value Role of Moths in Wildlife Conservation good for “hands on” demonstration of ecological strategies and connecting with nature Equipment & Familiarisation • Lights • Larvae • Traps • Photography • Nets • Weather • Baits • Keeping Records Lights Mercury vapour (MV) Actinic (ultraviolet/UV) Light Emitting Diode (LED) Tungsten (Incandescent) Halogen “Traps” Sheet – needs to be manned at all times. Good in the tropics Not good for abundance samples. Box – “Heath” and “Skinner” traps. Catch retention reasonable, but a long way from perfect. Bucket – “Robinson” trap most efficient design, but still well short of 100% catch retention. Large traps not very portable, smaller versions for use with actinic tubes more portable. Nets Sweep net Hand net Malaise trap Baits “Sugar” wine rope fruit Photo: Fritz Geller-Grimm faeces (via Wikipedia) synthetic pheromones others . Photo: D.E.Walter (http://homebuggarden.blogspot.hk /2014/06/winters-coming.html) Other important methods • Photography – have to stalk the subject(s), slow & steady on final approach; find good flower sources (e.g. Duranta, Lantana, Schefflera) • Rearing – essential to understand the ecological role of each species. Takes time, manpower and lots of TLC. Will result in finding many species not recorded at light traps. • Baiting – species specific pheromone traps, “sugar” or “mineral” or even other baits. Intensive effort, usually for only a limited number of species. Don’t always get the target audience! • Netting – useful for diurnal and crepuscular species, also finding larvae (sweeping). Photography digital camera macro function close focus control of flash best views to shoot for i.d. Getting close to butterflies and moths . Weather Adult Lepidoptera: avoid high wind & heavy rain; light rain / misty and warm conditions seem best for moths, butterflies are sun-worshippers; in HK night time min between 17°C and 28°C optimal; in UK between 8°C and ? (not warm enough) – in Malaysia & Singapore not much variation in any one place (so what happens if there’s a general rise in temperature?) larval searching: avoid heavy rain (everything washed away!) sugar/bait/pheromone: sunny weather with light breeze best Keeping Records • what was recorded; • kept in notebook or on computer database; • where seen/collected; • submit data to appropriate • when recorded; organisation • who made the observation; ( e.g. national or local nature • who made the id; society, biological records • sight record, voucher specimen centre, global data centre – (where kept), or photo; GBIF; iNaturalist). Identification . Adult stage - Larval stage • Wing pattern (lines across, • Number of prolegs on abdomen lines along, spots, scale tufts) • Body pattern • Wing shape • Appendages • Head features (eyes, antennae, • Hairs / tussocks labial palps); • Resting posture (flat, wings wrapped around body, tent like, deltoid, wings upright, other…..) Legal issues: Forests and Countryside Ordinance (Cap. 96); Wild Animals Protection Ordinance (Cap. 170); para 2 “…. “hunt” () includes any act immediately directed at the killing or capture of any wild animal or the taking of any nest, egg, or young of any wild animal; (Amended 58 of 1980 s. 2); “hunting appliance” () means any net, gin, snare, poison or poisoned weapon, bird lime, trap or bright light;” – applicable everywhere in HK ! Troides helena listed in Schedule 2, list of protected HK species Country Parks Ordinance (Cap. 208); “4 c (ii) to protect the vegetation and wild life inside country parks and special areas;” Protection of Endangered Species of Animals and Plants Ordinance (Cap. 586); - international trade of endangered taxa Troides spp. (Papilionidae); 2 species occur naturally in HK Thanks.
Recommended publications
  • Butterflies of Ontario & Summaries of Lepidoptera

    Butterflies of Ontario & Summaries of Lepidoptera

    ISBN #: 0-921631-12-X BUTTERFLIES OF ONTARIO & SUMMARIES OF LEPIDOPTERA ENCOUNTERED IN ONTARIO IN 1991 BY A.J. HANKS &Q.F. HESS PRODUCTION BY ALAN J. HANKS APRIL 1992 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION PAGE 1 2. WEATHER DURING THE 1991 SEASON 6 3. CORRECTIONS TO PREVIOUS T.E.A. SUMMARIES 7 4. SPECIAL NOTES ON ONTARIO LEPIDOPTERA 8 4.1 The Inornate Ringlet in Middlesex & Lambton Cos. 8 4.2 The Monarch in Ontario 8 4.3 The Status of the Karner Blue & Frosted Elfin in Ontario in 1991 11 4.4 The West Virginia White in Ontario in 1991 11 4.5 Butterfly & Moth Records for Kettle Point 11 4.6 Butterflies in the Hamilton Study Area 12 4.7 Notes & Observations on the Early Hairstreak 15 4.8 A Big Day for Migrants 16 4.9 The Ocola Skipper - New to Ontario & Canada .17 4.10 The Brazilian Skipper - New to Ontario & Canada 19 4.11 Further Notes on the Zarucco Dusky Wing in Ontario 21 4.12 A Range Extension for the Large Marblewing 22 4.13 The Grayling North of Lake Superior 22 4.14 Description of an Aberrant Crescent 23 4.15 A New Foodplant for the Old World Swallowtail 24 4.16 An Owl Moth at Point Pelee 25 4.17 Butterfly Sampling in Algoma District 26 4.18 Record Early Butterfly Dates in 1991 26 4.19 Rearing Notes from Northumberland County 28 5. GENERAL SUMMARY 29 6. 1990 SUMMARY OF ONTARIO BUTTERFLIES, SKIPPERS & MOTHS 32 Hesperiidae 32 Papilionidae 42 Pieridae 44 Lycaenidae 48 Libytheidae 56 Nymphalidae 56 Apaturidae 66 Satyr1dae 66 Danaidae 70 MOTHS 72 CONTINUOUS MOTH CYCLICAL SUMMARY 85 7.
  • Moths of the Douglas Lake Region (Emmet and Cheboygan Counties), Michigan: VI

    Moths of the Douglas Lake Region (Emmet and Cheboygan Counties), Michigan: VI

    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 35 Number 1 - Spring/Summer 2002 Number 1 - Article 10 Spring/Summer 2002 April 2002 Moths of the Douglas Lake Region (Emmet and Cheboygan Counties), Michigan: VI. Miscellaneous Small Families (Lepidoptera) Edward G. Voss University of Michigan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Voss, Edward G. 2002. "Moths of the Douglas Lake Region (Emmet and Cheboygan Counties), Michigan: VI. Miscellaneous Small Families (Lepidoptera)," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 35 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol35/iss1/10 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Voss: Moths of the Douglas Lake Region (Emmet and Cheboygan Counties), 2002 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 53 MOTHS OF THE DOUGLAS LAKE REGION (EMMET AND CHEBOYGAN COUNTIES), MICHIGAN: VI. MISCELLANEOUS SMALL FAMILIES (LEPIDOPTERA) Edward G. Voss1 ABSTRACT Forty-seven species in nine families of Lepidoptera (Hepialidae, Psychidae, Alucitidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Limacodidae, Thyrididae, Pterophoridae, Epiplemi- dae) are listed with earliest and latest recorded flight dates in Emmet and Cheboy- gan counties, which share the northern tip of the Lower Peninsula of Michigan. The records are from the principal institutional and private collections of Michigan moths and continue the documented listing of Lepidoptera in the region. ____________________ Emmet and Cheboygan counties share the northern tip of the Lower Peninsula of Michigan, the former bordered on the west by Lake Michigan and the latter, on the east by Lake Huron.
  • Contributions Toward a Lepidoptera (Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, Thyrididae, Drepanoidea, Geometro

    Contributions Toward a Lepidoptera (Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, Thyrididae, Drepanoidea, Geometro

    Contributions Toward a Lepidoptera (Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, Thyrididae, Drepanoidea, Geometroidea, Mimalonoidea, Bombycoidea, Sphingoidea, & Noctuoidea) Biodiversity Inventory of the University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Lab Hugo L. Kons Jr. Last Update: June 2001 Abstract A systematic check list of 489 species of Lepidoptera collected in the University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Lab is presented, including 464 species in the superfamilies Drepanoidea, Geometroidea, Mimalonoidea, Bombycoidea, Sphingoidea, and Noctuoidea. Taxa recorded in Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, and Thyrididae are also included. Moth taxa were collected at ultraviolet lights, bait, introduced Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), and by netting specimens. A list of taxa recorded feeding on P. notatum is presented. Introduction The University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Laboratory (NATL) contains 40 acres of natural habitats maintained for scientific research, conservation, and teaching purposes. Habitat types present include hammock, upland pine, disturbed open field, cat tail marsh, and shallow pond. An active management plan has been developed for this area, including prescribed burning to restore the upland pine community and establishment of plots to study succession (http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/natl.htm). The site is a popular collecting locality for student and scientific collections. The author has done extensive collecting and field work at NATL, and two previous reports have resulted from this work, including: a biodiversity inventory of the butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea & Papilionoidea) of NATL (Kons 1999), and an ecological study of Hermeuptychia hermes (F.) and Megisto cymela (Cram.) in NATL habitats (Kons 1998). Other workers have posted NATL check lists for Ichneumonidae, Sphecidae, Tettigoniidae, and Gryllidae (http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/insect.htm).
  • Faunal Diversity of Ajmer Aravalis Lepidoptera Moths

    Faunal Diversity of Ajmer Aravalis Lepidoptera Moths

    IOSR Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences (IOSR-JPBS) e-ISSN:2278-3008, p-ISSN:2319-7676. Volume 11, Issue 5 Ver. I (Sep. - Oct.2016), PP 01-04 www.iosrjournals.org Faunal Diversity of Ajmer Aravalis Lepidoptera Moths Dr Rashmi Sharma Dept. Of Zoology, SPC GCA, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India Abstract: Ajmer is located in the center of Rajasthan (INDIA) between 25 0 38 “ and 26 0 58 “ North 75 0 22” East longitude covering a geographical area of about 8481sq .km hemmed in all sides by Aravalli hills . About 7 miles from the city is Pushkar Lake created by the touch of Lord Brahma. The Dargah of khawaja Moinuddin chisti is holiest shrine next to Mecca in the world. Ajmer is abode of certain flora and fauna that are particularly endemic to semi-arid and are specially adapted to survive in the dry waterless region of the state. Lepidoptera integument covered with scales forming colored patterns. Availability of moths were more during the nights and population seemed to be Confined to the light areas. Moths are insects with 2 pair of broad wings covered with microscopic scales drably coloured and held flat when at rest. They do not have clubbed antennae. They are nocturnal. Atlas moth is the biggest moth. Keywords: Ajmer, Faunal diversity, Lepidoptera, Moths, Aravalis. I. Introduction Ajmer is located in the center of Rajasthan (INDIA) between 25 0 38 “ and 26 0 58 “ North Latitude and 73 0 54 “ and 75 0 22” East longitude covering a geographical area of about 8481sq km hemmed in all sides by Aravalli hills .
  • Quantifying Dispersal in British Noctuid Moths

    Quantifying Dispersal in British Noctuid Moths

    Quantifying dispersal in British noctuid moths Hayley Bridgette Clarke Jones Doctor of Philosophy University of York Biology September 2014 1 Abstract Dispersal is an important process in the ecology and evolution of organisms, affecting species’ population dynamics, gene flow, and range size. Around two thirds of common and widespread British macro-moths have declined in abundance over the last 40 years, and dispersal ability may be important in determining whether or not species persist in this changing environment. However, knowledge of dispersal ability in macro-moths is lacking because dispersal is difficult to measure directly in nocturnal flying insects. This thesis investigated the dispersal abilities of British noctuid moths to examine how dispersal ability is related to adult flight morphology and species’ population trends. Noctuid moths are an important taxon to study because of their role in many ecosystem processes (e.g. as pollinators, pests and prey), hence their focus in this study. I developed a novel tethered flight mill technique to quantify the dispersal ability of a range of British noctuid moths (size range 12 – 27 mm forewing length). I demonstrated that this technique provided measures of flight performance in the lab (measures of flight speed and distance flown overnight) that reflected species’ dispersal abilities reported in the wild. I revealed that adult forewing length was a good predictor of inter- specific differences in flight performance among 32 noctuid moth species. I also found high levels of intra-specific variation in flight performance, and both adult flight morphology and resource-related variables (amount of food consumed by individuals prior to flight, mass loss by adults during flight) contributed to this variation.
  • In Coonoor Forest Area from Nilgiri District Tamil Nadu, India

    In Coonoor Forest Area from Nilgiri District Tamil Nadu, India

    International Journal of Scientific Research in ___________________________ Research Paper . Biological Sciences Vol.7, Issue.3, pp.52-61, June (2020) E-ISSN: 2347-7520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26438/ijsrbs/v7i3.5261 Preliminary study of moth (Insecta: Lepidoptera) in Coonoor forest area from Nilgiri District Tamil Nadu, India N. Moinudheen1*, Kuppusamy Sivasankaran2 1Defense Service Staff College Wellington, Coonoor, Nilgiri District, Tamil Nadu-643231 2Entomology Research Institute, Loyola College, Chennai-600 034 Corresponding Author: [email protected], Tel.: +91-6380487062 Available online at: www.isroset.org Received: 27/Apr/2020, Accepted: 06/June/ 2020, Online: 30/June/2020 Abstract: This present study was conducted at Coonoor Forestdale area during the year 2018-2019. Through this study, a total of 212 species was observed from the study area which represented 212 species from 29 families. Most of the moth species were abundance in July to August. Moths are the most vulnerable organism, with slight environmental changes. Erebidae, Crambidae and Geometridae are the most abundant families throughout the year. The Coonoor Forestdale area was showed a number of new records and seems to supporting an interesting the monotypic moth species have been recorded. This preliminary study is useful for the periodic study of moths. Keywords: Moth, Environment, Nilgiri, Coonoor I. INTRODUCTION higher altitude [9]. Thenocturnal birds, reptiles, small mammals and rodents are important predator of moths. The Western Ghats is having a rich flora, fauna wealthy The moths are consider as a biological indicator of and one of the important biodiversity hotspot area. The environmental quality[12]. In this presentstudy moths were Western Ghats southern part is called NBR (Nilgiri collected and documented from different families at Biosphere Reserve) in the three states of Tamil Nadu, Coonoor forest area in the Nilgiri District.
  • Exploring Bycatch Diversity of Organisms in Whole Genome Sequencing of Erebidae Moths (Lepidoptera)

    Exploring Bycatch Diversity of Organisms in Whole Genome Sequencing of Erebidae Moths (Lepidoptera)

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.02.458197; this version posted September 3, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Exploring bycatch diversity of organisms in whole genome sequencing of Erebidae moths (Lepidoptera) Hamid Reza Ghanavi1, Victoria Twort1,2 and Anne Duplouy1,3 1 Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. 2 The Finnish Museum of Natural History Luomus, Zoology Unit, The University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland 3 Insect Symbiosis Ecology and Evolution, Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Program, The University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Corresponding Author: Hamid Reza Ghanavi Ecology Building, Sölvegatan 37, Lund, Skåne, 22362, Sweden Street Address, City, State/Province, Zip code, Country Email address: [email protected] ORCID: • Hamid Reza Ghanavi: 0000-0003-1029-4236 • Victoria Twort: 0000-0002-5581-4154 • Anne Duplouy: 0000-0002-7147-5199 Abstract Models estimate that up to 80% of all butterfly and moth species host vertically transmitted endosymbiotic microorganisms, which can affect the host fitness, metabolism, reproduction, population dynamics, and genetic diversity, among others. The supporting empirical data are however currently highly biased towards the generally more colourful butterflies, and include less information about moths. Additionally, studies of symbiotic partners of Lepidoptera bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.02.458197; this version posted September 3, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
  • Scientific Names of Pest Species in Tortricidae (Lepidoptera)

    Scientific Names of Pest Species in Tortricidae (Lepidoptera)

    RESEARCH Scientific Names of Pest Species in Tortricidae (Lepidoptera) Frequently Cited Erroneously in the Entomological Literature John W. Brown Abstract. The scientific names of several pest species in the moth meate the literature. For example, the subfamilial designation for family Tortricidae (Lepidoptera) frequently are cited erroneously in Olethreutinae (rather than Olethreutidae) was slow to be accepted contemporary entomological literature. Most misuse stems from the for many years following Obraztsov’s (1959) treatment of the group. fact that many proposed name changes appear in systematic treat- They even appear at both taxonomic levels (i.e., Olethreutinae and ments that are not seen by most members of the general entomologi- Olethreutidae) in different papers in the same issue of the Canadian cal community. Also, there is resistance among some entomologists Entomologist in the 1980s! (Volume 114 (6), 1982) Olethreutinae to conform to recently proposed changes in the scientific names of gradually was absorbed into the North America literature, espe- well-known pest species. Species names discussed in this paper are cially following publication of the Check List of the Lepidoptera Brazilian apple leafroller, Bonagota salubricola (Meyrick); western of America North of Mexico (Hodges 1983), which has served as a black-headed budworm, Acleris gloverana (Walsingham); and green standard for more than 20 years. budworm, Choristoneura retiniana (Walsingham). Generic names During preparation of a world catalog of Tortricidae (Brown discussed include those for false codling moth, Thaumatotibia leu- 2005), it became obvious to me that several taxonomically correct cotreta (Meyrick); grape berry moth, Paralobesia viteana (Clemens); combinations of important pest species were not in common use in pitch twig moth, Retinia comstockiana (Fernald); codling moth, the entomological literature.
  • The Microlepidoptera Section 1 Limacodidae Through Cossidae

    The Microlepidoptera Section 1 Limacodidae Through Cossidae

    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Technical Bulletins Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station 8-1-1983 TB109: A List of the Lepidoptera of Maine--Part 2: The icrM olepidoptera Section 1 Limacodidae Through Cossidae Auburn E. Brower Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/aes_techbulletin Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Brower, A.E. 1983. A list of the Lepidoptera of Maine--Part 2: The icrM olepidoptera Section 1 Limacodidae through Cossidae. Maine Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 109. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Technical Bulletins by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LIST OF THE LEPIDOPTERA OF MAINE Part 2 THE MICROLEPIDOPTERA Section I LIMACODIDAE THROUGH COSSIDAE Auburn E. Brower A JOINT PUBLICATION OF THE MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Maine Forest Service Division of Entomology, Augusta, Maine and the DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY. ORONO Maine Agricultural Experiment Station August 198! Representatives of the Diverse Groups of Included Microlepidoptera 1 Slug moth 2 Pyralid moth 3 Argyrid moth 4 Plume moth 5 Bell moth 6 Cosmopterygid moth 7 Gelechiid moth 8 Ethmiid moth 9 Gracilariid moth 10 Glyphipterygid moth 11 Aegeriid moth Inquiries regarding this bulletin may be sent to: Dr. Auburn E. Brower 8 Hospital Street Augusta, Maine 04330 A LIST OF THE LEPIDOPTERA OF MAINE Part 2 THE MICROLEPIDOPTERA Section I LIMACODIDAE THROUGH COSSIDAE Auburn E. Brower A JOINT PUBLICATION OF THE MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Maine Forest Service Division of Entomology, Augusta, Maine and the DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY.
  • Fernandez Triana Et Al Prasmodon

    Fernandez Triana Et Al Prasmodon

    JHR $$: Review@–@ (2014) of the Neotropical genus Prasmodon (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae)... 1 doi: 10.3897/JHR.@@.6748 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.pensoft.net/journals/jhr Review of the Neotropical genus Prasmodon (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae), with emphasis on species from Area de Conservación Guanacaste, northwestern Costa Rica Jose L. Fernandez-Triana1,2,†, James B. Whitfield3,‡, Alex M. Smith4,§, Winnie Hallwachs5,|, Daniel H. Janzen5,¶ 1 Department of Integrative Biology and the Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1 Canada 2 Canadian National Collection of Insects, 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6 Canada 3 Department of Entomology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA 4 Unité d’Entomologie fonctionnelle et évolutive, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Université de Liège, B-1030 Gembloux, Belgique; and Département d’entomologie, IRSNB, Rue Vautier 29, 1000 Bruxelles, Belgique 5 Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6018 USA † urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author: ‡ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author: § urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author: | urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author: ¶ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author: Corresponding author: Jose Fernandez-Triana ([email protected]) Academic editor: G. Broad | Received 4 December 2013 | Accepted 14 March2014 | Published @@ @@@@ 2014 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub: Citation: Fernández-Triana JL, Whitfield JB, Smith MA, Braet Y, Hallwachs W, Janzen DH (2014)Review of the Neotropical genus Prasmodon (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae),
  • The Vartian Collection Part I. Noctuoidea. Fibigeriana

    The Vartian Collection Part I. Noctuoidea. Fibigeriana

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Plate 1: 1. Dudusa nobilis; 2. Anticyra combusta; 3—4. Cerura vinula; 5—6. C. iberica; 7-8. C. delavoiei delavoiei; 9—11. C. delavoiei canariensis; 12—13. C. intermedia. 12 3 4 5 67 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Plate 102: 1—2. Dryobotodes carbonis europaea; 3—4. D. tenebrosa; 5. Blepharosis paspa; 6—7. B. grumi; 8—9. Bryopolia chamaeleon; 10—11. B. holosericea; 12—13. B. tsvetaevi; 14—15. B. virescens; 15. Bryoxena constricta; 16—17. B.tribulis; 18—20. B. centralasiae; 21—22. B. boursini; 23—26. Antitype chi; 27—28. A. jonis; 29—30. A. suda suda; 31—32. A. suda astfaelleri. 123 4 5 6 7 8 91011 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Plate 30: 1—2. Zanclognatha zelleralis; 3. Hydrillodes repugnalis; 4. Plusiodonta coelonota; 5. Oresia emarginata; 6. O. excavata; 7—8. Calyptra thalictri thalictri; 9—10. C. thalictri pallida; 11. C. hokkaida; 12. Eudocima okurai; 13. E. materna; 14—15. E. falonia; 16—17. Hypenodes humidalis; 18—19. H. orientalis; 20. H. turcomanica; 21. Schrankia balneorum; 22. S. costaestrigalis costaestrigalis; 23—24. S. costaestrigalis ssp. from Canary Islands; 25—26. S. taenialis; 27—28. Neachrostia kasyi; 29—30. Parascotia robiginosa. 1234 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 16 15 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Plate 58: 1—2.
  • The Immature Stages of Elachista Zonulae (Sruoga, 1992) (Lepidoptera: Elachistidae)

    The Immature Stages of Elachista Zonulae (Sruoga, 1992) (Lepidoptera: Elachistidae)

    © Entomologica Fennica. 12 February 2010 The immature stages of Elachista zonulae (Sruoga, 1992) (Lepidoptera: Elachistidae) Tomasz Baran Baran, T. 2009: The immature stages of Elachista zonulae (Sruoga, 1992) (Lepi- doptera: Elachistidae). Entomol. Fennica 20: 239244. The morphology of larva and pupa, as well as larval mines of Elachista zonulae (Sruoga, 1992) are described and illustrated for the first time. Carex firma Host is reported as a new host plant of the species; previously only Carex sempervirens Vill. was known to be host plant of E. zonulae. Some information on life history of this elachistid moth is also provided. The mature larva is 4.55.5 mm long. Pu- pation takes place usually at base of leaf blade of the food plant. The species is univoltine and hibernates as young larva. T. Baran, University of Rzeszów, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Cegielni- ana 12, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland; E-mail: [email protected] Received 12 November 2008, accepted 13 January 2009 1. Introduction 2. Material and methods A local, xeromontane elachistid moth Elachista The study was conducted in the Bia³ego Valley zonulae has relatively recently been described (950 m) and the Sarnia Ska³a Mt. (1,3501,370 from Central Asia (Sruoga & Puplesis 1992). In m) during 20042007 (Poland, the Tatra Mts.; Europe, it has so far been recorded only from UTM grid system DV 25). mountains of Slovakia, Poland (Tokár et al. 1999, For morphological research, 20 larvae, 14 pu- Tokár et al. 2002, Baran 2003), Austria, and pae, and 16 mines on Carex firma of Elachista France (Kaila & Varalda 2004) where it was en- zonulae were examined.