Inspector's Report ABP-308481-20
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
1 George's Quay Plaza
1 GEORGE’S QUAY PLAZA DUBLIN 2 CONTENTS 03 LOCATION 12 FLOOR PLANS 04 AERIAL VIEW 14 TRANSPORT 06 DESCRIPTION 16 CONTACT 10 AMENITIES LOCATION A landmark office This iconic development occupies a development situated strategic location between the IFSC, the south docklands and traditional Dublin 2. on the southern bank George’s Quay Plaza is recognised of the River Liffey in the as a prime commercial location with heart of Dublin’s CBD. world class occupiers including Pioneer Investments, Axa, Fidelity International, Ulster Bank and RBC Investor Services already in occupation. 2 3 AERIAL VIEW 1 GEORGE’S QUAY PLAZA STATE STREET THE NTMA THE AVIVA STADIUM THE CENTRAL BANK OF IRELAND CREDIT SUISSE PWC THE BORD GÁIS ENERGY THEATRE GOOGLE THE CONVENTION CENTRE DUBLIN THREE MOBILE VIRTU FINANCIAL CITADEL AXA BNY MELLON AIG HSBC BANK REALEX PAYMENTS PUBLICIS KBC BANK IRELAND BLOOMBERG MORGAN STANLEY HMH RIVERDEEP CITI BANK VERIZON DEPFA BANK BNP PARIBAS PEARSE ST STATION INFORMATICA RABOBANK SCOTIABANK INTESA SANPAOLO GENEVA TRADING SMBC JP MORGAN BANK GRANT THORNTON GAM FUND MANAGEMENT AEGON IRELAND KPMG ZURICH NORTHERN TRUST SOCIÉTÉ GÉNÉRALE SS&C SIG SUSQUEHANNA CONNOLLY STATION FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL TRINITY COLLEGE WELLS FARGO BANK OF MONTREAL THE CUSTOM HOUSE KBI GLOBAL INVESTORS BUSÁRAS TARA ST STATION ULSTER BANK THE IRISH TIMES 4 5 1 GEORGE’S QUAY PLAZA Grade A office building comprising approximately 150,000 sq ft of office accommodation over 11 floors. DESCRIPTION OCCUPIERS This iconic building has been designed to the highest standards and provides some of the most impressive office floors in the Dublin market with stunning views out over the river Liffey and The Custom House. -
REVISITING DUBLIN CITY QUAYS ASSIGNMENT 1: Interpreting & Understanding the Urban Narrative
REVISITING DUBLIN CITY QUAYS ASSIGNMENT 1: Interpreting & understanding the urban narrative ‘Dublin City Quays are the face of the city to the river. They are an essential part of what makes Dublin a special city. If we lose them we lose the soul of Dublin’ (Gerry Cahill, 1986) [Lombard, 1987] Rachel Loughrey ARCT 40020 UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE The Custom House and Georges Quay ‘Given its exceptional character this site offers the opportunity to make a unique piece of city in close proximity to the traditional urban centre’.(Benson et al.1987) Georges’ Quay and the area of the Custom House is a critical city block in Dublin located between the city and the port. City blocks are in a way like cells in a body, either helping the life and functioning of a city or blocking it like a cancer. This short report examines this way of analysing a city block. [Custom House and Georges’ Quay, 1980] [Custom House and Georges’ Quay, 2015] This analysis demonstrates that despite the best intentions of the planners, the city quay has turned out to have a cancerous negative impact on the city such as that the quay has failed in the following key criteria for healthy city blocks: 1.It is gated; shutting out diversity and pedestrians 2.It is nonfunctional excluding diversity 3.It is over scaled with no city green space, shutting out light and life to the street [photo:walking beside custom house] Georges’ city Quays and the Custom House in the 1980s were described as ‘largely redundant’.(Benson et al.1987) However since the area of the Custom House and Georges’ Quay ‘occupies a central and highly accessible waterfront location in the inner city’ (Benson et al.1987) it became a flame of interest for the government. -
DUBLIN 1756 to 1847 the Dublin of the Mid Eighteenth Century Captured by John Rocque in His That Had Begun to Use Steam Power
Dublin, from Blaquiere Bridge, Royal Canal, looking south, 1831, by George Petrie (Dublin delineated, p. 24) DUBLIN 1756 TO 1847 The Dublin of the mid eighteenth century captured by John Rocque in his that had begun to use steam power. Other legislation, however, addressed the Exact survey of the city and suburbs of Dublin was a sizeable city for the administration of the city or measures for improvement. The removal of certain period, indeed one of the largest in Europe,1 and had a mixture of impressive administrative functions from Dublin Corporation into bodies under central contemporary features alongside surviving medieval and early modern urban government control in the 1780s, such as paving, cleansing and lighting the fabric. The modern age was represented in fine public buildings, including streets, policing and responsibility for Dublin port, arose from allegations the substantial and impressive barracks, the Parliament House and Trinity of mismanagement by the corporation.5 As a result ad hoc bodies were College. The latter two defined a significant urban space at College Green that created to implement new measures such as the making of wide streets and was captured in engravings by Joseph Tudor (1753) and others (Plate 4). Some the improvement of Sackville Street and Marlborough Street, Rutland (later elements with their origins in the previous century were still impressive, such Parnell) Square, Merrion Square and the Circular Road. After the enactment of as the Royal Hospital at Kilmainham, the Liffey quays and St Stephen’s Green. the Union the flow of acts continued, though not at quite the same rate. -
EIS Metro North Volume 2 Book 7 of 7
Human Beings: 06 Radiation and stray current 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Study area 6.3 Impact assessment methodology 6.3.1 Magnitude 6.3.2 Significance 6.4 Impact assessment 6.4.1 Impact identification 6.4.2 Mitigation measures 6.4.3 Assessment of residual impacts 6.4.4 Summary of residual impacts Human Beings: Radiation and Stray Current and Stray Radiation Human Beings: This chapter of the EIS evaluates the potential for radiation (nuclear and electromagnetic) and stray current impacts to arise due to the construction and operation of the direct current, light rail traction systems associated with the proposed scheme in Area MN107. 6.1 Introduction Table 6.1 Study area This chapter of the EIS evaluates the potential Width of study for radiation (nuclear and electromagnetic) area (on both sides and stray current impacts to arise due to the Aspect of the alignment) construction and operation of the direct current, Potential impacts from 100m light rail traction systems associated with the Radiation and Stay Current proposed scheme in Area MN101. 6.2 STUDY AREA 6.3 Impact assessment methodologY The study area for this chapter is set out in Table The potential for EMI impacts has been assessed by: 6.1. EMI decreases very quickly with distance from the source at a ratio based on the square of the - Step 1: Selecting representative locations (cross distance between the source and the receptor. sections) of the alignment for detailed analysis; Disruption of normal household appliances - Step 2: Identifying representative scenarios usually occurs when magnetic field strengths of for detailed analysis (including failure modes 10 μT or more are present. -
Underwater Archaeological Survey, River Liffey
UNDERWATER & INTER-TIDAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT RIVER LIFFEY, 100M WEST OF O’CONNELL BRIDGE TO BUTT BRIDGE, DUBLIN CITY 08D094, 08R310 Client: The Railway Procurement Agency THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIVING COMPANY LTD. UNDERWATER & INTER-TIDAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT RIVER LIFFEY, 100M WEST OF O’CONNELL BRIDGE TO BUTT BRIDGE, DUBLIN CITY 08D094, 08R310 27 January 2008 Project Director Dr. Niall Brady Project Archaeologists Rex Bangerter MA Dr. Edward Pollard Brehon House, Kilkenny Road, Castlecomer, Co. Kilkenny [email protected] THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIVING COMPANY LTD. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 LIST OF FIGURES 3 LIST OF PLATES 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION 6 2.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 6 3.0 RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT 7 4.0 SURVEY METHODOLOGY 20 5.0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT 22 6.0 PROPOSED IMPACTS 35 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 36 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 38 Appendix 1- Chronological List of Quay Structures built along the 39 River Liffey on the North and South sides of the river. Appendix 2- List of RMP sites located in the vicinity of the River 41 Assessment Area. Appendix 3- Artefact Entries from the Topographic Files at the 43 National Museum of Ireland listed for the River Liffey. Appendix 4- Excavations Bulletin entries for River Liffey, River 45 Liffey Quays, and the North Wall. Appendix 5- Tabulated Dive Logs from the Underwater 53 Assessment. FIGURES AND PLATES 08D094, 08R310 RPA Metro North Underwater Archaeological Assessment River Liffey, Dublin EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Archaeological Diving Company Ltd (ADCO) was appointed by Irish Archaeological Consultancy Ltd (IAC), on behalf of the Railway Procurement Agency (RPA), to conduct non-disturbance quayside, inter- tidal, and underwater archaeological assessment of the River Liffey between O’Connell Bridge and Butt Bridge. -
Report Template Normal Planning Appeal
Inspector’s Report ABP 302980-18 Development Demolition of office building and construction of a 22 storey office and hotel building. Location Tara House, 2-16 Tara Street Dublin 2. Planning Authority Dublin City Council. Planning Authority Reg. Ref. 3794/18. Applicant(s) Tanat Ltd. Type of Application Permission. Planning Authority Decision To Refuse Permission. Type of Appeal First &Third Party. Appellant(s) Tanat Ltd. An Taisce. Observer(s) Kennedy Taverns Ltd. Ciaran Kennedy. Alstead Securities Ltd Date of Site Inspection 28th January, 2019. Inspector Breda Gannon ABP 302980-18 Inspector’s Report Page 1 of 83 Contents 1.0 Site Location and Description .............................................................................. 3 2.0 Proposed Development ....................................................................................... 3 3.0 Planning Authority Decision ................................................................................. 5 3.1. Decision ........................................................................................................ 5 3.2. Planning Authority Reports ........................................................................... 5 3.3. Prescribed Bodies ......................................................................................... 7 3.4. Third Party Observations .............................................................................. 8 4.0 Planning History ................................................................................................. 10 5.0 Policy -
Inspector's Report
An Bord Pleanála Inspector’s Report CASE REF: 29S.PA0012 Development: Redevelopment of Tara Street Station comprising a new and enlarged concourse and a commercial air rights development over. Tara Street Station, Tara Street, Dublin 2. Planning application: Planning Authority: Dublin City Council. Applicant: Iarnrod Eireann Type of Application: Application to Board under Section 37A of the Planning and Development 2000 as amended by the Planning and Development (Strategic Infrastructure) Act, 2006. Submissions from Prescribed Bodies • Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government. • Dublin Docklands Development Authority. • Rail Procurement Agency. • Railway Safety Commission. • Dublin Transportation Office. • Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources. Submission from Obervers • Mr. John Kennedy, Kennedy’s Taverns Ltd. • Mr. Colm Moore, Dublin Cycling Campaign (Oral Hearing only). • Mr. Damien Cassidy, National Conservation and Heritage Group Date of Site Inspection : 28th May 2009, 04th September 2009 and 11 th September ‘09. Inspector: Karla Mc Bride. PL 29S .PA0012 An Bord Pleanála Page 1 of 38 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 Pre-Planning Consultation with An Bord Pleanala As provided for under section 37B of the Planning and Development Act 2000, (as amended by the Planning and Development (Strategic Infrastructure) Act 2006), the applicant, Iarnrod Eireann, entered into discussions with An Bord Pleanala in relation to the proposed development (Case Ref. PC0047). Two meetings were held between An Bord Pleanala and Iarnrod Eireann on 27 th March 2008, and 25 th June 2008. The Board informed the applicant of its decision that the proposed redevelopment of Tara Street Station, Tara Street, Dublin 2 would be strategic infrastructure within the meaning of section 37A(2) (a) and (b) of the Act. -
DUBLIN 1610 to 1756 the Period of This Fascicle Is Framed by the Work of Two Important South-East
View from the Phoenix Park, c. 1753 (Tudor 3) DUBLIN 1610 TO 1756 The period of this fascicle is framed by the work of two important south-east. From the 1660s, the city authorities became heavily involved in cartographers — John Speed and John Rocque — whose maps of Dublin development alongside private entrepreneurs. While the earlier phase was are separated by 146 years. Although Speed’s map of 1610 (Map 5) depicts characterised by a traditional mentality in respect of facilities and buildings, an essentially late medieval city, there are features that distance the viewer development and planning on a broader canvas elicited fresh thinking: for from ‘Dublin’s complex and convoluted medieval imprint’.1 While the walls example, the privatisation of former communal land. Charles Brooking’s and gates of the city are prominently displayed, details of the intramural area cartographical and architectural depictions of Dublin in 1728 bear witness are limited and important sites, such as Christ Church Cathedral and Dublin not just to the evolution of these plans, but also to a third major development: Castle, contracted owing to the smallness of the map’s scale. In part, this the laying out of a ‘multi-centred metropolis’, born of grandiose and practical method of presentation permitted the inclusion of the four extramural suburbs, aspirations on the part of the state as well as civic leaders, and marked by allowing full play to the delineation of the two largest former monastic sites expansiveness in public architectural and infrastructural projects. Countering — those of St Mary’s Abbey and St Thomas’s Abbey — as well as St Patrick’s the centrifugal force of suburbanisation was a burgeoning official desire for Cathedral.