Inspector's Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inspector's Report An Bord Pleanála Inspector’s Report CASE REF: 29S.PA0012 Development: Redevelopment of Tara Street Station comprising a new and enlarged concourse and a commercial air rights development over. Tara Street Station, Tara Street, Dublin 2. Planning application: Planning Authority: Dublin City Council. Applicant: Iarnrod Eireann Type of Application: Application to Board under Section 37A of the Planning and Development 2000 as amended by the Planning and Development (Strategic Infrastructure) Act, 2006. Submissions from Prescribed Bodies • Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government. • Dublin Docklands Development Authority. • Rail Procurement Agency. • Railway Safety Commission. • Dublin Transportation Office. • Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources. Submission from Obervers • Mr. John Kennedy, Kennedy’s Taverns Ltd. • Mr. Colm Moore, Dublin Cycling Campaign (Oral Hearing only). • Mr. Damien Cassidy, National Conservation and Heritage Group Date of Site Inspection : 28th May 2009, 04th September 2009 and 11 th September ‘09. Inspector: Karla Mc Bride. PL 29S .PA0012 An Bord Pleanála Page 1 of 38 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 Pre-Planning Consultation with An Bord Pleanala As provided for under section 37B of the Planning and Development Act 2000, (as amended by the Planning and Development (Strategic Infrastructure) Act 2006), the applicant, Iarnrod Eireann, entered into discussions with An Bord Pleanala in relation to the proposed development (Case Ref. PC0047). Two meetings were held between An Bord Pleanala and Iarnrod Eireann on 27 th March 2008, and 25 th June 2008. The Board informed the applicant of its decision that the proposed redevelopment of Tara Street Station, Tara Street, Dublin 2 would be strategic infrastructure within the meaning of section 37A(2) (a) and (b) of the Act. The current application to An Bord Pleanala is made on foot of that decision. Oral Hearing An oral hearing was held in respect of this application on Tuesday 28 th July and Wednesday 29 th July and a summary of the proceedings is attached. 2.0 SITE AND DEVELOPMENT DETAILS 2.1 The site. The site is located in the Georges Quay area of Dublin City Centre, to the south of the River Liffey, to the east of O’Connell Bridge and to the south east of Butt Bridge. The site is bounded by Tara Street, Georges Quay, Luke Street, Poolbeg Street and the existing loop railway line. Liberty Hall, the Custom House and the IFSC are located on the opposite side of the River Liffey while the pyramidal Pricewaterhouse Copper and Ulster bank buildings are located to the east of the site. Kennedy’s public house, which is a protected structure, is located to the northwest of the site on the corner of Tara Street and Georges Quay. Photographs and maps in Appendix 1 serve to describe the site and location in some detail. 2.2 Proposed Development. A 10-year planning permission is being sought to redevelop Tara Street Station: • Demolish a number of existing structures: o Nos. 2, 4, 6, & 8-16 Tara Street. o Station ticket office and ancillary accommodation. o The Sub Lounge (formerly O’Reillys) under the existing arches. • Construct a new 20,990sq.m. 15-storey development comprising: o A glazed triple height concourse /office entrance from Tara Street with granite flank wall to west of Kennedy’s public house (Protected Structure). PL 29S .PA0012 An Bord Pleanála Page 2 of 38 o Increased station concourse (1,800sq.m.) with access from Tara Street and Georges Quay. o New station ancillary accommodation. o 342sq.m of retail floorspace for commuters. o Escalator, lift and stair access to platform level. o 14,990sq.m. of offices on 10 levels over the station concourse and northbound platform with an entrance from the corner of Tara Street and Poolbeg Street (16,355sq.m. inclusive of office and plant areas). o Mechanical plant on 13 th and 14 th floors (1,365sq.m.) o 10 disabled car parking and 150 cycle spaces for office users at basement level. o Basement level accessed by car lift off Poolbeg Street. o Glazed roof over platforms between Georges Quay and Poolbeg Street. 2.3 Environmental Impact Statement The EIS submitted with the planning application was prepared in accordance with Part X of the Planning and Development Regulations. The impact of the proposed development was assessed under all the relevant headings with respect to human beings, flora and fauna, landscape and visibility, cultural heritage, soils, water, services, transportation, noise, air quality, waste management, interactions and alternatives. The content and scope of the EIS is considered to be adequate and in compliance with Planning Regulations. No likely significant adverse impacts were identified and mitigation measures were proposed where moderate impacts were identified. 2.4 Need for development The applicant submits that the proposed development is needed to improve facilities for passengers using Tara Street Station. The station is a central station along the DART line which runs from Malahide in North Dublin to Greystones in Co. Wicklow as well as serving suburban rail. They state that this station is one of the busiest in the network, it is the closest station to the City Centre and it also serves the Docklands area which includes the IFSC on the opposite side of the River Liffey. Iarnrod Eireann identified several objectives for the redevelopment of the station: • To double passenger capacity of Tara Street DART by improving all station operating facilities and amenities. • To greatly improve pedestrian spaces associated with the station at all levels, establishing views between the platforms and the street. • To create a distinctive landmark building which will identify the new station and add to the modern cityscape of Dublin. • To facilitate greater interchange of transport (bus/rail). PL 29S .PA0012 An Bord Pleanála Page 3 of 38 3.0 PLANNING HISTORY Reg. Reg. 0158/00 – PP sought for a new station concourse with a mixed use air rights development, AI request not complied with. Reg. Ref.0948/01 – PP granted for a new station concourse with a 10-storey office development with restaurant over station concourse, decision upheld following a Third Party appeal under PL 29S 128164. Reg. Ref. 2813/01 – PP granted for a new station entrance off Townsend Street. 4.0 NATIONAL AND REGIONAL PLANNING POLICY Extracts of the relevant policy documents are contained in Appendix 2 to this report. 4.1 National Development Plan The National Development Plan involves a major economic investment by the Government to invest in the infrastructure of the State in a coherent manner in line with other policy initiatives and transport infrastructure is a key element. The Plan acknowledges the economic importance of the Greater Dublin Area and envisages further development in this area “in a more compact and sustainable manner” by promoting “higher density development around a strengthened public transport grid.” It is a key objective of the Plan to radically upgrade public transport systems particularly in the Greater Dublin Area by providing increased investment in public transport expenditure which will in turn facilitate increased use of public transport. 4.2 National Spatial Strategy 2002-2020 The NSS sets out a national planning framework to co-ordinate future development and planning throughout the country in a sustainable manner and to consolidate the physical growth of Dublin while recognising its national and international importance. 4.3 Regional Planning Guidelines for the Greater Dublin Area. The Guidelines, which provide a long term planning framework for the development of the Greater Dublin Area, seek to consolidate development, increase overall densities and facilitate the provision of improved public transport. 4.4 Dublin Transport Office – A Platform for Change 2000-2016 This strategy comprises two main elements. The first element seeks to reduce the growth in travel while maintaining economic progress which would be largely achieved by a shift from private to public transport plus greater numbers either walking or cycling. The second element involves infrastructure and service improvements including the development of Metro North, the DART Underground (Interconnector) and better public transport facilities together with better use of M50 and national routes. The strategy identifies Tara Street Station as a suitable site for an interchange between DART/suburban rail and the proposed METRO. PL 29S .PA0012 An Bord Pleanála Page 4 of 38 4.5 Transport 21 Transport 21 is a capital investment framework under the National Development Plan through which the transport system in Ireland will be developed between 2006 and 2015. This framework will address the twin challenges of past investment backlogs and continuing growth in transport demand. The projects and programmes that make up Transport 21 will aim to: • Increase accessibility. • Ensure sustainability. • Expand capacity. • Increase use. • Enhance quality. Transport 21 is made up of two investment programmes – a national programme and a programme for the Greater Dublin area. The main objectives of the GDA programme are which are of relevant to the proposed development are set out below: • To develop Metro North and Metro West. • To construct the Suburban Rail Interconnector providing a tunnelled link between Heuston Station and the Docklands, via St. Stephen’s Green and linking with the Northern line. • To extend the LUAS network to the Docklands, Citywest, Bray and construct a new line from St Stephen's Green to Liffey Junction
Recommended publications
  • 1 George's Quay Plaza
    1 GEORGE’S QUAY PLAZA DUBLIN 2 CONTENTS 03 LOCATION 12 FLOOR PLANS 04 AERIAL VIEW 14 TRANSPORT 06 DESCRIPTION 16 CONTACT 10 AMENITIES LOCATION A landmark office This iconic development occupies a development situated strategic location between the IFSC, the south docklands and traditional Dublin 2. on the southern bank George’s Quay Plaza is recognised of the River Liffey in the as a prime commercial location with heart of Dublin’s CBD. world class occupiers including Pioneer Investments, Axa, Fidelity International, Ulster Bank and RBC Investor Services already in occupation. 2 3 AERIAL VIEW 1 GEORGE’S QUAY PLAZA STATE STREET THE NTMA THE AVIVA STADIUM THE CENTRAL BANK OF IRELAND CREDIT SUISSE PWC THE BORD GÁIS ENERGY THEATRE GOOGLE THE CONVENTION CENTRE DUBLIN THREE MOBILE VIRTU FINANCIAL CITADEL AXA BNY MELLON AIG HSBC BANK REALEX PAYMENTS PUBLICIS KBC BANK IRELAND BLOOMBERG MORGAN STANLEY HMH RIVERDEEP CITI BANK VERIZON DEPFA BANK BNP PARIBAS PEARSE ST STATION INFORMATICA RABOBANK SCOTIABANK INTESA SANPAOLO GENEVA TRADING SMBC JP MORGAN BANK GRANT THORNTON GAM FUND MANAGEMENT AEGON IRELAND KPMG ZURICH NORTHERN TRUST SOCIÉTÉ GÉNÉRALE SS&C SIG SUSQUEHANNA CONNOLLY STATION FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL TRINITY COLLEGE WELLS FARGO BANK OF MONTREAL THE CUSTOM HOUSE KBI GLOBAL INVESTORS BUSÁRAS TARA ST STATION ULSTER BANK THE IRISH TIMES 4 5 1 GEORGE’S QUAY PLAZA Grade A office building comprising approximately 150,000 sq ft of office accommodation over 11 floors. DESCRIPTION OCCUPIERS This iconic building has been designed to the highest standards and provides some of the most impressive office floors in the Dublin market with stunning views out over the river Liffey and The Custom House.
    [Show full text]
  • REVISITING DUBLIN CITY QUAYS ASSIGNMENT 1: Interpreting & Understanding the Urban Narrative
    REVISITING DUBLIN CITY QUAYS ASSIGNMENT 1: Interpreting & understanding the urban narrative ‘Dublin City Quays are the face of the city to the river. They are an essential part of what makes Dublin a special city. If we lose them we lose the soul of Dublin’ (Gerry Cahill, 1986) [Lombard, 1987] Rachel Loughrey ARCT 40020 UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE The Custom House and Georges Quay ‘Given its exceptional character this site offers the opportunity to make a unique piece of city in close proximity to the traditional urban centre’.(Benson et al.1987) Georges’ Quay and the area of the Custom House is a critical city block in Dublin located between the city and the port. City blocks are in a way like cells in a body, either helping the life and functioning of a city or blocking it like a cancer. This short report examines this way of analysing a city block. [Custom House and Georges’ Quay, 1980] [Custom House and Georges’ Quay, 2015] This analysis demonstrates that despite the best intentions of the planners, the city quay has turned out to have a cancerous negative impact on the city such as that the quay has failed in the following key criteria for healthy city blocks: 1.It is gated; shutting out diversity and pedestrians 2.It is nonfunctional excluding diversity 3.It is over scaled with no city green space, shutting out light and life to the street [photo:walking beside custom house] Georges’ city Quays and the Custom House in the 1980s were described as ‘largely redundant’.(Benson et al.1987) However since the area of the Custom House and Georges’ Quay ‘occupies a central and highly accessible waterfront location in the inner city’ (Benson et al.1987) it became a flame of interest for the government.
    [Show full text]
  • DUBLIN 1756 to 1847 the Dublin of the Mid Eighteenth Century Captured by John Rocque in His That Had Begun to Use Steam Power
    Dublin, from Blaquiere Bridge, Royal Canal, looking south, 1831, by George Petrie (Dublin delineated, p. 24) DUBLIN 1756 TO 1847 The Dublin of the mid eighteenth century captured by John Rocque in his that had begun to use steam power. Other legislation, however, addressed the Exact survey of the city and suburbs of Dublin was a sizeable city for the administration of the city or measures for improvement. The removal of certain period, indeed one of the largest in Europe,1 and had a mixture of impressive administrative functions from Dublin Corporation into bodies under central contemporary features alongside surviving medieval and early modern urban government control in the 1780s, such as paving, cleansing and lighting the fabric. The modern age was represented in fine public buildings, including streets, policing and responsibility for Dublin port, arose from allegations the substantial and impressive barracks, the Parliament House and Trinity of mismanagement by the corporation.5 As a result ad hoc bodies were College. The latter two defined a significant urban space at College Green that created to implement new measures such as the making of wide streets and was captured in engravings by Joseph Tudor (1753) and others (Plate 4). Some the improvement of Sackville Street and Marlborough Street, Rutland (later elements with their origins in the previous century were still impressive, such Parnell) Square, Merrion Square and the Circular Road. After the enactment of as the Royal Hospital at Kilmainham, the Liffey quays and St Stephen’s Green. the Union the flow of acts continued, though not at quite the same rate.
    [Show full text]
  • EIS Metro North Volume 2 Book 7 of 7
    Human Beings: 06 Radiation and stray current 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Study area 6.3 Impact assessment methodology 6.3.1 Magnitude 6.3.2 Significance 6.4 Impact assessment 6.4.1 Impact identification 6.4.2 Mitigation measures 6.4.3 Assessment of residual impacts 6.4.4 Summary of residual impacts Human Beings: Radiation and Stray Current and Stray Radiation Human Beings: This chapter of the EIS evaluates the potential for radiation (nuclear and electromagnetic) and stray current impacts to arise due to the construction and operation of the direct current, light rail traction systems associated with the proposed scheme in Area MN107. 6.1 Introduction Table 6.1 Study area This chapter of the EIS evaluates the potential Width of study for radiation (nuclear and electromagnetic) area (on both sides and stray current impacts to arise due to the Aspect of the alignment) construction and operation of the direct current, Potential impacts from 100m light rail traction systems associated with the Radiation and Stay Current proposed scheme in Area MN101. 6.2 STUDY AREA 6.3 Impact assessment methodologY The study area for this chapter is set out in Table The potential for EMI impacts has been assessed by: 6.1. EMI decreases very quickly with distance from the source at a ratio based on the square of the - Step 1: Selecting representative locations (cross distance between the source and the receptor. sections) of the alignment for detailed analysis; Disruption of normal household appliances - Step 2: Identifying representative scenarios usually occurs when magnetic field strengths of for detailed analysis (including failure modes 10 μT or more are present.
    [Show full text]
  • Underwater Archaeological Survey, River Liffey
    UNDERWATER & INTER-TIDAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT RIVER LIFFEY, 100M WEST OF O’CONNELL BRIDGE TO BUTT BRIDGE, DUBLIN CITY 08D094, 08R310 Client: The Railway Procurement Agency THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIVING COMPANY LTD. UNDERWATER & INTER-TIDAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT RIVER LIFFEY, 100M WEST OF O’CONNELL BRIDGE TO BUTT BRIDGE, DUBLIN CITY 08D094, 08R310 27 January 2008 Project Director Dr. Niall Brady Project Archaeologists Rex Bangerter MA Dr. Edward Pollard Brehon House, Kilkenny Road, Castlecomer, Co. Kilkenny [email protected] THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIVING COMPANY LTD. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 LIST OF FIGURES 3 LIST OF PLATES 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION 6 2.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 6 3.0 RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT 7 4.0 SURVEY METHODOLOGY 20 5.0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT 22 6.0 PROPOSED IMPACTS 35 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 36 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 38 Appendix 1- Chronological List of Quay Structures built along the 39 River Liffey on the North and South sides of the river. Appendix 2- List of RMP sites located in the vicinity of the River 41 Assessment Area. Appendix 3- Artefact Entries from the Topographic Files at the 43 National Museum of Ireland listed for the River Liffey. Appendix 4- Excavations Bulletin entries for River Liffey, River 45 Liffey Quays, and the North Wall. Appendix 5- Tabulated Dive Logs from the Underwater 53 Assessment. FIGURES AND PLATES 08D094, 08R310 RPA Metro North Underwater Archaeological Assessment River Liffey, Dublin EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Archaeological Diving Company Ltd (ADCO) was appointed by Irish Archaeological Consultancy Ltd (IAC), on behalf of the Railway Procurement Agency (RPA), to conduct non-disturbance quayside, inter- tidal, and underwater archaeological assessment of the River Liffey between O’Connell Bridge and Butt Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Template Normal Planning Appeal
    Inspector’s Report ABP 302980-18 Development Demolition of office building and construction of a 22 storey office and hotel building. Location Tara House, 2-16 Tara Street Dublin 2. Planning Authority Dublin City Council. Planning Authority Reg. Ref. 3794/18. Applicant(s) Tanat Ltd. Type of Application Permission. Planning Authority Decision To Refuse Permission. Type of Appeal First &Third Party. Appellant(s) Tanat Ltd. An Taisce. Observer(s) Kennedy Taverns Ltd. Ciaran Kennedy. Alstead Securities Ltd Date of Site Inspection 28th January, 2019. Inspector Breda Gannon ABP 302980-18 Inspector’s Report Page 1 of 83 Contents 1.0 Site Location and Description .............................................................................. 3 2.0 Proposed Development ....................................................................................... 3 3.0 Planning Authority Decision ................................................................................. 5 3.1. Decision ........................................................................................................ 5 3.2. Planning Authority Reports ........................................................................... 5 3.3. Prescribed Bodies ......................................................................................... 7 3.4. Third Party Observations .............................................................................. 8 4.0 Planning History ................................................................................................. 10 5.0 Policy
    [Show full text]
  • Inspector's Report ABP-308481-20
    Inspector’s Report ABP-308481-20 Development Amendments to previously permitted development, Reg. Ref. 3794/18 / ABP Ref. 302980-18 , Change of use at ground floor level from hotel/restaurant entrance foyer to restaurant/cafe/retail foyer- Change of use of the hotel to office at 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th floor level and change of use of hotel/office to retail/cafe/restaurant at 5th floor level. Location Site of 0.2 ha bound by Georges Quay to the north, Tara Street to the west, Poolbeg Street to the south and Tara Street Station to the east. The site includes lands of the former Tara House, 2-16 Tara Street, Dublin 2, D02 W597 Planning Authority Dublin City Council South Planning Authority Reg. Ref. 3165/20 Applicant(s) Tanat Limited Type of Application Permission ABP-308481-20 Inspector’s Report Page 1 of 18 Planning Authority Decision Refuse Type of Appeal First / Third Party Appellant(s) Tanat Limited Observer(s) TII Date of Site Inspection 08th February 2021 Inspector Colin McBride ABP-308481-20 Inspector’s Report Page 2 of 18 1.0 Site Location and Description The site is located between the city centre to the west and the docklands to the east and to the south of the River Liffey in Dublin 2. It comprises an urban land block (c 0.2 ha) that is bounded to the north by George’s Quay, to the east by Tara Street and to the south by Poolbeg Street. The site lies immediately adjacent to Tara Street station and includes part of the station concourse.
    [Show full text]
  • DUBLIN 1610 to 1756 the Period of This Fascicle Is Framed by the Work of Two Important South-East
    View from the Phoenix Park, c. 1753 (Tudor 3) DUBLIN 1610 TO 1756 The period of this fascicle is framed by the work of two important south-east. From the 1660s, the city authorities became heavily involved in cartographers — John Speed and John Rocque — whose maps of Dublin development alongside private entrepreneurs. While the earlier phase was are separated by 146 years. Although Speed’s map of 1610 (Map 5) depicts characterised by a traditional mentality in respect of facilities and buildings, an essentially late medieval city, there are features that distance the viewer development and planning on a broader canvas elicited fresh thinking: for from ‘Dublin’s complex and convoluted medieval imprint’.1 While the walls example, the privatisation of former communal land. Charles Brooking’s and gates of the city are prominently displayed, details of the intramural area cartographical and architectural depictions of Dublin in 1728 bear witness are limited and important sites, such as Christ Church Cathedral and Dublin not just to the evolution of these plans, but also to a third major development: Castle, contracted owing to the smallness of the map’s scale. In part, this the laying out of a ‘multi-centred metropolis’, born of grandiose and practical method of presentation permitted the inclusion of the four extramural suburbs, aspirations on the part of the state as well as civic leaders, and marked by allowing full play to the delineation of the two largest former monastic sites expansiveness in public architectural and infrastructural projects. Countering — those of St Mary’s Abbey and St Thomas’s Abbey — as well as St Patrick’s the centrifugal force of suburbanisation was a burgeoning official desire for Cathedral.
    [Show full text]