Download Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download Thesis This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ What makes a painting sad? Brassey, Vanessa Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 09. Oct. 2021 What makes a painting sad? Vanessa Brassey A Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2020 This thesis includes work from two papers published in peer review journals: BRASSEY, V. 2019. The Implied Painter. Debates in Aesthetics, Volume 14(1) 15-29. BRASSEY, V. 2020. Still Moving. Debates in Aesthetics, Volume 15,1, 35-50. 1 This is not a love story. It is a whodunnit. In seven chapters 2 Table of Contents LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS .................................................................................................................. 6 ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................... 8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................. 9 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 11 THE PROJECT ........................................................................................................................................... 11 METHODOLOGICAL PRELIMINARIES ............................................................................................................. 13 1 THE ‘AIR’ OF FACES ................................................................................................................ 18 1.1 EMOTIONS AND EXPRESSIONS ....................................................................................................... 20 1.1.1 How can expressions be constituent parts of emotions? ........................................................... 21 1.1.2 Expressions as parts of the whole. ............................................................................................. 24 1.2 SEEING EMOTIONS ...................................................................................................................... 27 1.2.1 Seeing common sense ................................................................................................................ 28 1.2.2 What a perspective is, and what a perspective is on. ................................................................. 35 1.2.3 Seeing a part and having an experience of a whole ................................................................... 36 1.2.4 Paradigm and aesthetic cases ..................................................................................................... 42 2 PAINTING ............................................................................................................................... 45 2.1 WHAT MAKES A PAINTING? .......................................................................................................... 45 2.1.1 Necessary conditions .................................................................................................................. 46 2.2 WHAT MAKES A PAINTING SAD? ..................................................................................................... 48 2.2.1 The concept of pictorial expression ............................................................................................ 49 2.2.2 Who has analysed pictorial expression? ..................................................................................... 50 2.2.3 The persona theory of expression .............................................................................................. 52 2.3 AN INTUITIVE SOLUTION ............................................................................................................... 53 3 THE ‘AIR’ OF PAINTINGS ......................................................................................................... 61 3 3.1 IMPERSONALIST CONTOUR THEORIES ............................................................................................... 62 3.2 EXPRESSIVENESS AS EXPERIENCED RESEMBLANCE ............................................................................... 62 3.2.1 Evaluation of ‘experienced resemblance’ ................................................................................... 64 3.3 EXPRESSIVE LOOKS THAT INDICATE EMOTIONS ................................................................................... 67 3.4 Evaluation of ‘looks that function to indicate’ ............................................................................... 78 3.5 EXPRESSIVENESS AS SENSORY RESEMBLANCE ..................................................................................... 85 3.6 Evaluation of ‘sensory resemblance’ ............................................................................................. 97 4 THE ‘HEIR’ OF PAINTINGS ...................................................................................................... 108 4.1 EXPRESSIVENESS AS VISUAL METAPHOR .......................................................................................... 112 4.1.1 Evaluation of visual metaphor .................................................................................................. 114 4.2 EXPRESSIVENESS AS PERCEPTUAL METAPHOR .................................................................................. 116 4.2.1 Evaluation of the Perceptual Metaphor model ........................................................................ 122 4.3 METAPHORISING ....................................................................................................................... 127 4.3.1 Evaluation of Metaphorising .................................................................................................... 130 4.4 A BETTER THEORISATION OF PERSPECTIVES ...................................................................................... 133 5 THE ‘INHERITED’ PERSPECTIVE .............................................................................................. 141 5.1 ROBINSON’S IMPLIED PAINTER ...................................................................................................... 145 5.1.1 The challenge from Lopes ......................................................................................................... 148 5.1.2 An error ..................................................................................................................................... 148 5.1.3 Moving from (Pa) to (Pb) .......................................................................................................... 152 5.2 ROBINSON’S EMPATHIC VIEWER .................................................................................................... 155 5.2.1 What is ‘empathetic perspective-taking’? ................................................................................ 155 5.2.2. Criticisms ................................................................................................................................. 159 6 A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON EMOTIONS .................................................................................... 169 6.1 THE ACTUAL AND NON-ACTUAL PERSPECTIVE .................................................................................... 172 6.1.1. Actual perspectives .................................................................................................................. 172 6.1.2 Non-actual perspectives ........................................................................................................... 173 6.2 THE PERSPECTIVE YOU REPRESENT ................................................................................................. 176 6.3 THE PERSPECTIVE YOU REPRESENT ON THE PAINTING .......................................................................... 178 4 6.4 SEEING, VISUALISING AND REPRESENTING PERSPECTIVES ..................................................................... 180 6.4.1 Visualising ................................................................................................................................. 182 6.4.2 What makes a painting sad ....................................................................................................... 185 6.4.3 The epistemic role of mediating perspectives .........................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Effect of War on Art: the Work of Mark Rothko Elizabeth Leigh Doland Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2010 The effect of war on art: the work of Mark Rothko Elizabeth Leigh Doland Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Doland, Elizabeth Leigh, "The effect of war on art: the work of Mark Rothko" (2010). LSU Master's Theses. 2986. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2986 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EFFECT OF WAR ON ART: THE WORK OF MARK ROTHKO A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Liberal Arts in The Interdepartmental Program in Liberal Arts by Elizabeth Doland B.A., Louisiana State University, 2007 May 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………iii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………........1 2 EARLY LIFE……………………………………………………....3 Yale Years……………………………………………………6 Beginning Life as Artist……………………………………...7 Milton Avery…………………………………………………9 3 GREAT DEPRESSION EFFECTS………………………………...13 Artists’ Union………………………………………………...15 The Ten……………………………………………………….17 WPA………………………………………………………….19
    [Show full text]
  • Torturing the Artist: Celebrity and Trope in Media Representations of the Abstract Expressionists
    1 Torturing the Artist: Celebrity and Trope in Media Representations of the Abstract Expressionists A Senior Honors Thesis in the Department of Art and Art History By Phoebe Cavise Under the advisement of Professor Eric Rosenberg Professor Malcolm Turvey 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………………... 3 Introduction About the Paper ……………………………………………………………… 5 Definitions …………………………………………………………………… 8 Celebrity, Suicide, and Celebrity Suicides ………………………………….. 11 About the Process …………………………………………………………… 19 Chapter I. Pollock: Life, Death, and Everything In Between …………………………... 23 Chapter II. Pollock Background …………………………………………………………………. 44 Biopic: Portrait of a Genre ………………………………………………….. 49 Media within Media ………………………………………………………… 53 The Tools of Torture ………………………………………………………... 74 Chapter III. Rothko: Life, Death, and Everything After ……………………………….. 81 Chapter IV. Red Background …………………………………………………………………. 88 Reality and Red ……………………………………………………………... 91 Misery’s Company ………………………………………………………… 103 Productions and Press ……………………………………………………… 108 Chapter V. Directing Red ……………………………………………………………... 119 Conclusions………………………………………………………………………...….. 130 Bibliography ………………………………………………………………………….. 134 3 Acknowledgments First and foremost, thank you to Professor Eric Rosenberg for his complete faith in me. When I proposed a questionably-relevant thesis topic he accepted it wholeheartedly and has done nothing but encourage me every step of the way, even when many of those steps came later than planned. His enthusiasm was paramount to this paper’s completion. Thank you to Professor Ikumi Kaminishi who has advised the latter half of my college career. I am lucky to have worked with someone so supportive and brilliant, whose challenging Theories and Methods class forced me to become a better art historian. Thank you to Professor Malcolm Turvey for joining this project on a topic only half- related to the field in which he is so respected. I only wish my thesis could have been more relevant to his knowledge and utilized his expertise more.
    [Show full text]
  • Court Ruling in Rothko Case Shows Limits of Art-World Secrecy
    AiA Art News-service Court Ruling in Rothko Case Shows Limits of Art-World Secrecy ARTSY EDITORIAL BY ISAAC KAPLAN OCT 12TH, 2016 10:47 PM The United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. A lawsuit has offered a peek behind the normally closed doors that shield private art sales. The contentious six-year legal battle over a supposedly breached confidentiality agreement stemmed from the 2007 sale of a major Mark Rothko painting. The case pitted wealthy Texas widow Marguerite Hoffman against billionaire buyer David Martinez and L&M Arts, the now-defunct gallery that arranged the work’s $17.6 million purchase. Hoffman filed her suit in May 2010 after the work was re-sold for $31.4 million during a public auction at Sotheby’s, an act she claimed violated the original sale’s confidentiality agreement by disclosing that the 2007 sale had ever taken place. Some observers warned that if decided in Hoffman’s favor, the case could have meant that legal agreements ensuring a transaction’s secrecy could be used to effectively prohibit future sales of the art they governed. With little fanfare, a federal appellate court in Texas weighed in on the case of the so-called “Red Rothko” two weeks ago, ruling that the confidentiality agreement governing the original sale did not apply to the existence of the sale itself and, moreover, that the parties involved never intended it to. The appeals court’s verdict is a major victory for Martinez and L&M, and one that all but puts the strange case to bed.
    [Show full text]
  • Should I Invest in Art? Alexandra Eldridge [email protected]
    Sotheby's Institute of Art Digital Commons @ SIA MA Projects Student Scholarship and Creative Work 2016 Should I Invest in Art? Alexandra Eldridge [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.sia.edu/stu_proj Part of the Arts Management Commons, Finance and Financial Management Commons, Other Business Commons, and the Portfolio and Security Analysis Commons Recommended Citation Eldridge, Alexandra, "Should I Invest in Art?" (2016). MA Projects. 7. https://digitalcommons.sia.edu/stu_proj/7 This MA Project - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship and Creative Work at Digital Commons @ SIA. It has been accepted for inclusion in MA Projects by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ SIA. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Should I Invest in Art? By: Alexandra Eldridge 2016 Master’s Project Elizabeth Pergam Word Count: ~12,000 12/19/16 Table of Contents Background………………………………………………………………………………………2 Section I: The Market……………………………………………………………………………4 Art vs. stocks…………. .………………………………………………………………….8 Art vs. real estate …………………………………………………………………..…….10 Art vs. gold ………………………………………………………………………………11 Art vs. wine ……………………………………………………………………………...13 Art as commodity ………………………………………………………………………..13 Symbolic value …………………………………………………………………………..16 Transparency, insider trading, and access ……………………………………………….19 Section II: The Claims………………………………………………………………………….21 Art price indices ………………………………………………………………………....23 Diversification and non-correlation
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Rothko and His Art
    Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health SciO p Forschene n HUB for Sc i e n t i f i c R e s e a r c h ISSN 2474-7769 | Open Access RESEARCH ARTICLE Volume 3 - Issue 2 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.16966/2474-7769.127 Risk Factors in Suicide: Mark Rothko and His Art Hartman JJ* Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA *Corresponding author: Hartman JJ, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA, E-mail: [email protected] Received: 26 Aug, 2018 | Accepted: 17 Oct, 2018 | Published: 26 Oct, 2018 Citation: Hartman JJ (2018) Risk Factors in Suicide: Mark Rothko and His Art. J Psychiatry Ment Health 3(2): dx.doi.org/10.16966/2474- 7769.127 Copyright: © 2018 Hartman JJ. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract The purpose of this paper is to describe risk factors in the assessment of lethal suicidal intent by means of an examination of the artist Mark Rothko’s life history, his art, and his completed suicide. While Rothko’s suicidal crisis seems to have been touched off by a diagnosis of a dissecting aneurysm, other risk factors can be seen to have been operating since his childhood. This paper examines both the psychiatric risk factors like early object loss, recurrent depressions, substance abuse, and relationship disruption and as well as more intrapsychic risk factors like affect flooding, self and object splitting, narcissistic vulnerability, and unconscious fantasies of surviving the suicidal assault.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2018 • Volume 68 Number 8 MAGAZINE [email protected]
    PRSRT STD Riverside US POSTAGE County LAWYER PAID PERMIT #1054 Riverside County Bar Association RIVERSIDE, CA 4129 Main St., Ste. 100, Riverside, CA 92501 RCBA 951-682-1015 LRS 951-682-7520 September 2018 • Volume 68 Number 8 MAGAZINE www.riversidecountybar.com [email protected] In This Issue Opposing Counsel: David Porras Art, Science, Innovation and “The Law”— Amusement Rides and Attractions Art Valuation and the Internal Revenue Service The Riverside Art Museum Lessons from History: Protecting Artists and Art Owners from Losing Their Art Collecting Art in Riverside: A Few Thoughts Art at a U.S. Penitentiary Rothko’s Litigation Legacy Stolen Treasures: An Inquiry into the Repatriation of Cultural Property The Official Publication of the Riverside County Bar Association Ad - 8.5 x 11 PROTECTION IS IN OUR NATURE. For the past 40 years, Lawyers’ Mutual Insurance Company has been solely dedicated to protecting and advancing the practices of California lawyers. This is our expertise and we are proud to say that we have served over 40,000 lawyers and handled over 16,000 claims during this time. Our reputation of stability, consistency, and strength has been cultivated over the past 40 years, and we’re constantly evolving to serve the lawyers of California with the premier professional liability coverage and continued legal education resources. As a mutual with no outside shareholders, our members invest in and benefit from the Company’s stability. We have always valued our members above all, and we remain dedicated to protecting your future. Contact us at 818.565.5512 or [email protected] … so you can practice with peace of mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Rothko Moved Through Many Artistic Styles Until Reaching His Signature 1950S Motif of Soft, Rectangular Forms Floating on a Stained Field of Color
    "If you are only moved by color relationships, you are missing the point. I am interested in expressing the big emotions - tragedy, ecstasy, doom." SYNOPSIS A prominent figure among the New York School painters, Mark Rothko moved through many artistic styles until reaching his signature 1950s motif of soft, rectangular forms floating on a stained field of color. Heavily influenced by mythology and philosophy, he was insistent that his art was filled with content, and brimming with ideas. A fierce champion of social revolutionary thought, and the right to self- expression, Rothko also expounded his views in numerous essays and critical reviews. KEY IDEAS Highly informed by Nietzsche, Greek mythology, and his Russian-Jewish heritage, Rothko's art was profoundly imbued © The Art Story Foundation – All rights Reserved For more movements, artists and ideas on Modern Art visit www.TheArtStory.org with emotional content that he articulated through a range of styles that evolved from figurative to abstract. Rothko's early figurative work - including landscapes, still lifes, figure studies, and portraits - demonstrated an ability to blend Expressionism and Surrealism. His search for new forms of expression led to his color field paintings, which employed shimmering color to convey a sense of spirituality. Rothko maintained the social revolutionary ideas of his youth throughout his life. In particular he supported artist's total freedom of expression, which he felt was compromised by the market. This belief often put him at odds with the art world establishment, leading him to publicly respond to critics, and occasionally refuse commissions, sales and exhibitions. ARTIST BIOGRAPHY Childhood Born in Dvinsk, Russia (in what is now Latvia), Marcus Rothkovich was the fourth child born to Jacob and Anna Rothkovich.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Printing 600
    The End is the Beginning A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy from the University of New South Wales By LINDY LEE College of Fine Art, 2001 1 CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINALITY I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person. nor material which to a substantial extent has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. Any contnbution made to the · research by others, with whom I have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work. except to the extent that assistance from others in the project's design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged (Signed) ......................~~ :: .............. t........................................ [A_z_ . ABSTRACT The End is the Beginning Questions of loss and impermanence have always been central issues in my work. This thesis examines how beliefs about 'self' in relation to the Void/ death/ impermanence direct visuality in painting. My painting practice develops from a Zen Buddhist standpoint, which is used as the frame of reference for this thesis. For me, the two painters who have served as perpetual touchstones on this issue are Mark Rothko and Ad Reinhardt. examine how their beliefs and philosophical perspectives are embodied in their work. Further to this, I examine strands of their thinking, which are carried forward into my own.
    [Show full text]
  • James E. B. Breslin Research Archive on Mark Rothko, 1900-1994 (Bulk 1940-1990)
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt1t1nd961 Online items available Finding aid for the James E. B. Breslin research archive on Mark Rothko, 1900-1994 (bulk 1940-1990) Laurel McPhee and Andra Darlington. Finding aid for the James E. B. 2003.M.23 1 Breslin research archive on Mark Rothko, 1900-1994 (bulk 1... Descriptive Summary Title: James E. B. Breslin research archive on Mark Rothko Date (inclusive): 1900-1994 (bulk 1940-1990) Number: 2003.M.23 Creator/Collector: Breslin, James E. B., 1935- Physical Description: 18.7 Linear Feet(32 boxes, 1 flat file folder) Repository: The Getty Research Institute Special Collections 1200 Getty Center Drive, Suite 1100 Los Angeles 90049-1688 [email protected] URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10020/askref (310) 440-7390 Abstract: Archive assembled by James Breslin, professor at the University of California, Berkeley, as he researched and wrote Mark Rothko: a biography. The Russian-born American painter's life and work are the central subjects of the collection, situated in broad historical and artistic contexts with particular emphasis on Abstract Expressionism and the New York art world from the 1920s through the 1960s. Materials include interview recordings and transcripts, correspondence, financial and legal documents, photographs, clippings, assorted printed materials, and extensive notes. Request Materials: Request access to the physical materials described in this inventory through the catalog record for this collection. Click here for the access policy . Language: Collection material is in English Biographical/Historical Note James E. B. Breslin was born December 12, 1935, in Brooklyn, New York. He received a B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlling the Artful Con: Authentication and Regulation Leonard D
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 27 | Issue 5 Article 2 5-1976 Controlling the Artful Con: Authentication and Regulation Leonard D. DuBoff Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Leonard D. DuBoff, Controlling the Artful Con: Authentication and Regulation, 27 Hastings L.J. 973 (1976). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol27/iss5/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Controlling the Artful Con: Authentication and Regulation By LEONARD D. Du BOFF* Introduction IN appraising art, the signature affixed,1 the period of creation, and the expert's determination of authenticity are inextricably interwoven with the aesthetic appeal.' Perception of the artistic merits of a piece is also affected by these factors. Consequently, the discovery and disclo- sure that a once-accepted original is actually a copy or forgery creates confusion; 2 the market value plummets and critics pan once lauded works.3 An estimated 14 to 10 percent5 of all art transactions involve forgeries or fakes. While the percentage may seem small, the amount of money involved is impressive. 6 It has been suggested that every new art collection contains at least one fake; some collections contain little else.7 * B.E.S., 1968, Hofstra University; J.D., 1971, Brooklyn Law School. Associate Professor of Law, Lewis and Clark College; President, Oregon Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts, Inc.; Chairman, AALS Section on Law and the Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on Estate of Rothko: the Role of the Legal Advisor in Relation to the Artist
    Cleveland State Law Review Volume 26 Issue 4 Symposium: Art and Law Article 9 1977 Reflections on Estate of Rothko: The Role of the Legal Advisor in Relation to the Artist Gustave Harrow Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, Estates and Trusts Commons, and the Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Gustave Harrow, Reflections on Estate of Rothko: The Role of the Legal Advisor in Relation ot the Artist, 26 Clev. St. L. Rev. 573 (1977) available at https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev/vol26/iss4/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REFLECTIONS ON ESTATE OF ROTHKO: THE ROLE OF THE LEGAL ADVISOR IN RELATION TO THE ARTIST GUSTAVE HARROW* LONG PRIOR TO HIS TRAcIC end in 1970, Mark Rothko wrote: A picture lives by companionship, expanding and quickening in the eyes of the sensitive observer. It dies by the same token. It is, therefore, a risky and unfeeling act to send it out into the world. How often it must be permanently impaired by the eyes of the vulgar and cruelty of the impotent who would extend their affliction universally!1 Perhaps more than any acclaimed modern artist, Rothko was in- tensely concerned and preoccupied with the ultimate fate of his works.
    [Show full text]
  • Writings on Art Is the First Book to Bring Together the Artist's Other Written Works
    Mark Rothkc EDITED And with an introduction, annotations, AND CHRONOLOGY BY MIGUEL LOPEZ-REMIRO Mark Rothko (1903-1970), one of the greatest artists of the twentieth century, was engaged in the written discourse of his colleagues and critics throughout his life. While the essays and letters of many of his contem¬ poraries have been collected,, however, Rothko's writ¬ ings have only recently come to light, beginning with the critically acclaimed The Artist's Reality: Philosophies of Art (Yale University Press). Writings on Art is the first book to bring together the artist's other written works. It includes some ninety documents—including short essays, letters, statements, and lectures—written b Rothko over the course of his career. The texts are extensively annotated, and a chronolo y of the artist's life and work is also included. This provocative compilation of both published and unpublished writings from 1934 to 1969 contains a number of revelations about Rothko; the importance of writing for an artist who many believed had renounced the written word; the meaning of transmission and transition that he experienced as an art teacher at the Brooklyn Jewish Center Academy; his deep concern for meditation and spirituality; and his private relation¬ ships with such contem orary artists as Barnett Newman, Robert Motherwell, and Clyfford Still, as well as with journalists and curators. As was true also of The Artist's Reality, what emerges from this collectiory^anuanced picture of a sophisti¬ cated, deeply l<i^^^^^^le, and philosophical artist who was also articulate writer. ^3 s> OLIVER-WENDELL-HOLMES # f§) * LIB RARY S gjjpgr amphem altwrcL .
    [Show full text]