DOCSLIB.ORG

Playing the Game of Video Game Classification Game Over for Europe?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Playing the Game of Video Game Classification Game Over for Europe? Master Thesis 2016 – 2017 Tilburg University Faculty of Law LL.M. Law and Technology Playing the game of video game classification Game Over for Europe? Author: Stephan van der Velden ANR: 964836 Under the supervision of: Dr. C.M.K.C. Cuijpers ABSTRACT Over the last few decades the video game industry transformed into one of the fastest growing and most profitable entertainment industries in the world. The global video game market is estimated to generate US$99.6 billion in 2016. Despite this significant economic footprint in our society it is surprising to see no specific legislation has been established in relation to video games and intellectual property laws - more specifically copyright laws. This thesis shall dive into video game qualification within the European Copyright Framework with a dualistic goal – establishing where video games fall within our current European copyright framework and determine whether these video games are sufficiently protected within said framework. To reach the goals above, this thesis will analyze video games and its characteristics, study how a video game fits within the regimes of protection of computer programs and audiovisual works, assess the qualification methods for said regimes within Europe in relation to video games and briefly discuss an alternative tailor-made regime for video games. The aim of this thesis is to establish if and how video games are qualified within the European copyright framework and strives to provide an overview of potential issues that arise with such a qualification. Consequently, it should become apparent whether video games are in need of better protection within the European copyright framework. As such, the results of this thesis should provide some support for ongoing (legislative) debates on copyright protection of video games. Keywords: video games, copyright, audiovisual works, computer programs, regimes of protection, distributive qualification, unitary qualification. 1 FOREWORD Player authorship and transformative use of video games was initially the main research question of this thesis. However, during the early research sessions it became apparent that the classification discussion of video games is still ongoing. Thus, it seems appropriate and effective to tackle video game classification before engaging in any research topic in relation to player authorship. The latter being a valid opportunity for further research. After this longer than expected journey, and as tradition dictates, I would like to express my gratitude to several persons for their patience, support and guidance whilst writing this thesis. Firstly, I would like to thank my supervisor Colette Cuijpers for her patience, helpful and extreme swift remarks and feedback, and allowing me in finalizing the topic I envisioned. Secondly, I would like to thank my direct colleagues and my manager Christine FLOBERT- POLI at SAP for their support and for providing me with the necessary capacity to finalize this research. Thirdly, a special appreciation to my girlfriend Eirini Tserepi for her relentless patience but unquestionable support during this process. She has ensured to keep me motivated during this process and assured finalization of the research. I hope you enjoy your reading. Stephan van der Velden Utrecht, July 9, 2017 2 ABBREVIATIONS ECJ European Court of Justice EU The European Union FPS First Person Shooters GUI Graphical User Interface IPR Intellectual property right PC Personal Computer ROMS Microcircuit Chips RPG Role Playing Games TPS Third Person Shooters TRIPS Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights USA United States of America WCT WIPO Copyright Treaty WIPO World Intellectual Property Organization WTO World Trade Organization 3 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 6 1.1. Background ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.2. Research questions ............................................................................................................ 8 1.3. Limitations ............................................................................................................................. 9 1.4. Thesis Structure .................................................................................................................. 9 2. What is in the game? ......................................................................................................... 11 2.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 11 2.2. Video game characteristics ........................................................................................... 11 2.3. The video game industry ............................................................................................... 13 2.3.1. Categorizing video games ..................................................................................... 13 2.4. Stakeholders within the gaming industry ............................................................... 15 3. Copyright Framework ........................................................................................................ 17 3.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 17 3.2. Global copyright perspective ....................................................................................... 18 3.3. Acquis Communautaire .................................................................................................. 19 3.3.1. CPD ................................................................................................................................ 20 3.3.2. InfoSoc ......................................................................................................................... 21 3.4. Copyright elements and principles ............................................................................ 22 3.4.1. Rationale of copyright ............................................................................................. 22 3.4.2. Ownership in Copyright.......................................................................................... 23 3.4.3. The scope of Copyright? ........................................................................................ 23 3.4.4. Duration of protection ............................................................................................ 25 3.4.5. Originality principle .................................................................................................. 26 3.4.6. Copyright and related rights ................................................................................ 29 3.5. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 30 4. Two regimes of protection.............................................................................................. 31 4.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 31 4.2. Audiovisual works............................................................................................................. 31 4.3. Computer programs ........................................................................................................ 34 4.4. The rules of audiovisual works .................................................................................... 36 4.5. The rules of computer programs ................................................................................ 39 4 4.6. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 40 5. Video games versus the regimes of protection ................................................. 41 5.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 41 5.2. Video games as computer programs? ...................................................................... 41 5.2.1. How do video games play with computer programs? ................................ 42 5.3. Video games as Audiovisual Works? ......................................................................... 44 5.3.1. How do video games play with audiovisual works? .................................... 45 5.4. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 47 6. European qualification methods ................................................................................. 49 6.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 49 6.2. Unitary approach as Audiovisual or Computer Program ................................... 49 6.3. Distributive classification of video games ............................................................... 51 6.4. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 53 7. A tailor-made regime for video games? ................................................................. 54 7.1. Conclusion ..........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Building a Poker Playing Agent Based on Game Logs Using Supervised Learning
    FACULDADE DE ENGENHARIA DA UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO Building a Poker Playing Agent based on Game Logs using Supervised Learning Luís Filipe Guimarães Teófilo Mestrado Integrado em Engenharia Informática e Computação Orientador: Professor Doutor Luís Paulo Reis 26 de Julho de 2010 Building a Poker Playing Agent based on Game Logs using Supervised Learning Luís Filipe Guimarães Teófilo Mestrado Integrado em Engenharia Informática e Computação Aprovado em provas públicas pelo Júri: Presidente: Professor Doutor António Augusto de Sousa Vogal Externo: Professor Doutor José Torres Orientador: Professor Doutor Luís Paulo Reis ____________________________________________________ 26 de Julho de 2010 iv Resumo O desenvolvimento de agentes artificiais que jogam jogos de estratégia provou ser um domínio relevante de investigação, sendo que investigadores importantes na área das ciências de computadores dedicaram o seu tempo a estudar jogos como o Xadrez e as Damas, obtendo resultados notáveis onde o jogador artificial venceu os melhores jogadores humanos. No entanto, os jogos estocásticos com informação incompleta trazem novos desafios. Neste tipo de jogos, o agente tem de lidar com problemas como a gestão de risco ou o tratamento de informação não fiável, o que torna essencial modelar adversários, para conseguir obter bons resultados. Nos últimos anos, o Poker tornou-se um fenómeno de massas, sendo que a sua popularidade continua a aumentar. Na Web, o número de jogadores aumentou bastante, assim como o número de casinos online, tornando o Poker numa indústria bastante rentável. Além disso, devido à sua natureza estocástica de informação imperfeita, o Poker provou ser um problema desafiante para a inteligência artificial. Várias abordagens foram seguidas para criar um jogador artificial perfeito, sendo que já foram feitos progressos nesse sentido, como o melhoramento das técnicas de modelação de oponentes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mathematical Analysis of Games, Focusing on Variance
    The Mathematical Analysis of Games, Focusing on Variance Dr. ir. Tom Verhoeff, TU Eindhoven Last November, I gave a lunch talk on game analysis for W.I.S.V. Mathematically interesting questions are: Given the game's state, `Christiaan Huygens'. If you missed it, you can catch up here. how do you decide your best move? Which player can force the best Games, Mathematics, and Decisions outcome from the start? What is the (long-term) optimum result? Games have always been loved by mathematicians. Because of their A Strategic Coin Game (usually) well-defined rules, games admit a formal analysis, sometimes Let us dive into a simple strategic coin game. The two players, with surprising results. It is impossible to provide comprehensive Alice and Bob, simultaneously and secretly each choose 0 (head) or coverage in this article. Instead, I will give an overview and focus on 1 (tail)1. After committing their choices, the payoff is determined by the role of variance, which is often overlooked. the matrix in Figure 2. Alice receives e 2 from Bob when the choices J¨orgBewersdorff wrote a nice book on applying mathematics to the Bob chooses analysis of games [2]. I recommend it to the mathematically inclined reader. It classifies games according to the sources of uncertainty 0 1 that confront the players, also see Figure 1. m m Combinatorial Games generate uncertainty by the many ways in which 0 " 1 2 moves can be combined, in spite of the fact that the players have Alice chooses m open access to all information.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications of Game Theory in Project Management: a Structured Review and Analysis
    mathematics Review Applications of Game Theory in Project Management: A Structured Review and Analysis Mahendra Piraveenan Faculty of Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; [email protected] Received: 30 July 2019; Accepted: 4 September 2019; Published: 17 September 2019 Abstract: This paper provides a structured literature review and analysis of using game theory to model project management scenarios. We select and review thirty-two papers from Scopus, present a complex three-dimensional classification of the selected papers, and analyse the resultant citation network. According to the industry-based classification, the surveyed literature can be classified in terms of construction industry, ICT industry or unspecified industry. Based on the types of players, the literature can be classified into papers that use government-contractor games, contractor–contractor games, contractor-subcontractor games, subcontractor–subcontractor games or games involving other types of players. Based on the type of games used, papers using normal-form non-cooperative games, normal-form cooperative games, extensive-form non-cooperative games or extensive-form cooperative games are present. Also, we show that each of the above classifications plays a role in influencing which papers are likely to cite a particular paper, though the strongest influence is exerted by the type-of-game classification. Overall, the citation network in this field is sparse, implying that the awareness of authors in this field about studies by other academics is suboptimal. Our review suggests that game theory is a very useful tool for modelling project management scenarios, and that more work needs to be done focusing on project management in ICT domain, as well as by using extensive-form cooperative games where relevant.
    [Show full text]
  • An Instrument to Build a Gamer Clustering Framework According to Gaming Preferences and Habits
    Computers in Human Behavior 62 (2016) 353e363 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Computers in Human Behavior journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/comphumbeh Full length article An instrument to build a gamer clustering framework according to gaming preferences and habits * Borja Manero a, c, , Javier Torrente b, Manuel Freire c, Baltasar Fernandez-Manj on c a Harvard University, USA b University College of London, UK c Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain article info abstract Article history: In the era of digital gaming, there is a pressing need to better understand how people's gaming pref- Received 20 October 2015 erences and habits affect behavior and can inform educational game design. However, instruments Received in revised form available for such endeavor are rather informal and limited, lack proper evaluation, and often yield re- 1 March 2016 sults that are hard to interpret. In this paper we present the design and preliminary validation (involving Accepted 31 March 2016 N ¼ 754 Spanish secondary school students) of a simple instrument that, based on a 10-item Game Preferences Questionnaire (GPQ), classifies participants into four ‘clusters’ or types of gamers, allowing for easy interpretation of the results. These clusters are: (1) Full gamers, covering individuals that play all Keywords: fi Educational games kinds of games with a high frequency; (2) Hardcore gamers, playing mostly rst-person shooters and Classification of gamers sport games; (3) Casual gamers, playing moderately musical, social and thinking games; and (4) Non- Gaming preferences and habits gamers, who do not usually play games of any kind. The instrument may have uses in psychology and Instruments for serious games behavioral sciences, as there is evidence suggesting that attitudes towards gaming affects personal at- Applied games titudes and behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • How Video Games Expose Children to Gambling
    Gambling on games How video games expose children to gambling Gambling themes, simulated gambling and outright gambling for objects with monetary value are found in a range of video games, including some of the most popular. Changes to the classification system to restrict gambling content to adults would go some way to addressing this problem. Discussion paper Bill Browne February 2020 About The Australia Institute The Australia Institute is an independent public policy think tank based in Canberra. It is funded by donations from philanthropic trusts and individuals and commissioned research. We barrack for ideas, not political parties or candidates. Since its launch in 1994, the Institute has carried out highly influential research on a broad range of economic, social and environmental issues. About the Centre for Responsible Technology The Australia Institute established the Centre for Responsible Technology to give people greater influence over the way technology is rapidly changing our world. The Centre will collaborate with academics, activists, civil society and business to shape policy and practice around network technology by raising public awareness about the broader impacts and implications of data-driven change and advocating policies that promote the common good. Our philosophy As we begin the 21st century, new dilemmas confront our society and our planet. Unprecedented levels of consumption co-exist with extreme poverty. Through new technology we are more connected than we have ever been, yet civic engagement is declining. Environmental neglect continues despite heightened ecological awareness. A better balance is urgently needed. The Australia Institute’s directors, staff and supporters represent a broad range of views and priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Real-Time Rule-Based Classification of Player Types in Computer Games
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto Real-time rule-based classification of player types in computer games Ben Cowley, Darryl Charles, Michaela Black & Ray Hickey User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction The Journal of Personalization Research ISSN 0924-1868 User Model User-Adap Inter DOI 10.1007/s11257-012-9126-z 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer Science+Business Media B.V.. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self- archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your work, please use the accepted author’s version for posting to your own website or your institution’s repository. You may further deposit the accepted author’s version on a funder’s repository at a funder’s request, provided it is not made publicly available until 12 months after publication. 1 23 Author's personal copy User Model User-Adap Inter DOI 10.1007/s11257-012-9126-z ORIGINAL PAPER Real-time rule-based classification of player types in computer games Ben Cowley · Darryl Charles · Michaela Black · Ray Hickey Received: 8 September 2011 / Accepted in revised form: 16 July 2012 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Abstract The power of using machine learning to improve or investigate the expe- rience of play is only beginning to be realised. For instance, the experience of play is a psychological phenomenon, yet common psychological concepts such as the typology of temperaments have not been widely utilised in game design or research.
    [Show full text]
  • Generic Interface for Developing Abstract Strategy Games
    Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto Generic Interface for Developing Abstract Strategy Games Ivo Miguel da Paz dos Reis Gomes Master in Informatics and Computing Engineering Supervisor: Luís Paulo Reis (PhD) February 2011 Generic Interface for Developing Abstract Strategy Games Ivo Miguel da Paz dos Reis Gomes Master in Informatics and Computing Engineering Approved in oral examination by the committee: Chair: António Augusto de Sousa (PhD) External Examiner: Pedro Miguel Moreira (PhD) Supervisor: Luís Paulo Reis (PhD) 11th February 2011 Abstract Board games have always been a part of human societies, being excellent tools for con- veying knowledge, express cultural ideals and train thought processes. To understand their cul- tural and intellectual significance is not only an important part of anthropological studies but also a pivotal catalyst in advances in computer sciences. In the field of Artificial Intelligence in particular, the study of board games provides ways to understand the relations between rule sets and playing strategies. As board games encompass an enormous amount of different types of game mechanics, the focus shall be put on abstract strategy games to narrow the study and to circumvent the problems derived from uncertainty. The aim of this work is to describe the research, planning and development stages for the project entitled “Generic Interface for Developing Abstract Strategy Games”. The project con- sists in the development of a generic platform capable of creating any kind of abstract strategy game, and is essentially divided in three phases: research on board games and related topics, design and specification of a system that could generate such games and lastly the development of a working prototype.
    [Show full text]
  • Impartial Intersection Restriction Games
    Impartial Intersection Restriction Games by Melissa Huggan A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Pure Mathematics Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario c 2015 Melissa Huggan Abstract Intersection restriction games are games played on hypergraphs in which options for a player are restricted based on previous play via some intersection property. This paper focuses on two games within this class: Arc-Kayles and a Triple Packing game. Arc-Kayles is a game where, on their turn, players remove an edge and all adjacent edges from a graph. Together, players are forming a maximal matching. The Triple Packing game is a combinatorial design game where players are choosing triples such that no two triples chosen share a pair. Both games are played under normal play. We give new results for Arc-Kayles played on a special star graph and the wheel graph as well as partial results for the Triple Packing game played on the complete graph. ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. Brett Stevens. Brett's knowledge and insight into mathematical connections has been very inspirational to my academic curiosity. Brett has provided me with invaluable national and international academic opportunities which expanded my mathematical thinking to new creative levels. I would also like to thank my examination committee members for their suggestions and thought-provoking questions throughout my thesis defence. My committee members include: Dr. Kevin Cheung from the School of Mathematics and Statistics at Carleton University; Dr. Jason Etele from the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Carleton University; and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Unifying Game Ontology: a Faceted Classification of Game Elements
    Unifying Game Ontology: A Faceted Classification of Game Elements Michael S. Debus This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) at the IT University of Copenhagen. Title: Unifying Game Ontology: A Faceted Classification of Game Elements Candidate: Michael S. Debus [email protected] Supervisor: Espen Aarseth Examination Committee: Dr. Hanna Wirman Dr. Aki Järvinen Prof. Frans Mäyrä This research has received funding from the European ResearchCouncil (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant Agreement No [695528] – MSG: Making Sense of Games). Resumé I mindst hundrede år er spil blevet defineret og klassificeret. I de sidste to årtier er der dog opstået en forøget forskningsmæssig interesse for hvad spil er og består af. For at at udvikle en mere entydig terminologi for spil og deres bestanddele, undersøger denne afhandling spillets ontologi i to henseende. Med en tilgang inspireret af Wittgenstein, belyser jeg de forskellige betydninger der knytter sig til udtrykket ’spil’. Jeg fremlægger en ikke-udtømmende oversigt over fem underliggende ideer, der tjener som områder hvor man kan finde spils såkaldte familie-ligheder: spil som genstande, forløb, systemer, holdninger og ud fra deres udvikling og distribution. Jeg introducerer dernæst en række ontologiske begreber, for at kunne eksplicitere den forståelse af spil, som tages i anvendelse i denne afhandling. Spil er ’specifikker’ – samlinger af anonyme ’partikulærer’ – som enten kan være materialiseret (som genstande) eller instantieret (som forløb). Jeg vil dernæst, ud fra en ludologisk tilgang, undersøge spils underliggende formelle system. En række begreber fra biblioteksvidenskaben danner rammen for en analyse af de distinktioner der bliver anvendt i seksten forskellige spil-klassificeringer.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Player Zero Sum Multi-Stage Game Analysis Using Coevolutionary Algorithm
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2019 Two Player Zero Sum Multi-Stage Game Analysis Using Coevolutionary Algorithm Sumedh Sopan Nagrale Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Commons Repository Citation Nagrale, Sumedh Sopan, "Two Player Zero Sum Multi-Stage Game Analysis Using Coevolutionary Algorithm" (2019). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 2175. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/2175 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TWO PLAYER ZERO SUM MULTI-STAGE GAME ANALYSIS USING COEVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM. A Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Electrical Engineering By SUMEDH SOPAN NAGRALE B.E.,University of Mumbai, 2012 2019 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL April 24, 2019 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Sumedh Sopan Nagrale ENTITLED Two Player Zero Sum Multi-Stage Game Analysis Using Coevolutionary Algorithm BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DE- GREE OF Master of Science in Electrical Engineering. Luther Palmer, III, Ph.D. Thesis Director. Fred D. Garber, Ph.D. Chair, Department of Electrical Engineering Committee on Final Examination: Luther Palmer, III, Ph.D. Pradeep Misra, Ph.D. Xiaodong Zhang, Ph.D. Barry Milligan, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Facet Analysis of Video Game Genres
    Facet Analysis of Video Game Genres Jin Ha Lee1, Natascha Karlova1, Rachel Ivy Clarke1, Katherine Thornton1 and Andrew Perti2 1 University of Washington, Information School 2 Seattle Interactive Media Museum Abstract Genre is an important feature for organizing and accessing video games. However, current descriptors of video game genres are unstandardized, undefined, and embedded with multiple information dimensions. This paper describes the development of a more complex and sophisticated scheme consisting of 12 facets and 358 foci for describing and representing video game genre information. Using facet analysis, the authors analyzed existing genre labels from scholarly, commercial, and popular sources, and then synthesized them into discrete categories of indexing terms. This new, more robust scheme provides a framework for improved intellectual access to video games along multiple dimensions. Keywords: genre, facet analysis, video game, interactive media Citation: Lee, J. H., Karlova, N., Clarke, R. I., Thornton, K., & Perti, A. (2014). Facet Analysis of Video Game Genres. In iConference 2014 Proceedings (p. 125–139). doi:10.9776/14057 Copyright: Copyright is held by the authors. Acknowledgements: We thank Dr. Joseph Tennis (University of Washington, Information School) and Michael Carpenter (Seattle Interactive Media Museum) for their contributions to the project. We also thank the University of Washington’s Office of Research for their financial support for this research. Contact: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 1 Introduction As video games increase in popularity, users expect efficient and intelligent access to them, similar to their access to other media. Game designers, manufacturers, scholars, educators, players and parents of young gamers all need meaningful ways of finding, accessing, and interpreting video games.
    [Show full text]
  • Is It All a Game? Understanding the Principles of Gamification
    Business Horizons (2015) 58, 411—420 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification a, b a a Karen Robson *, Kirk Plangger , Jan H. Kietzmann , Ian McCarthy , a Leyland Pitt a Beedie School of Business, Simon Fraser University, 500 Granville Street, Vancouver, BC V6C 1W6, Canada b King’s College London, University of London, Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 9NH, UK KEYWORDS Abstract There is growing interest in how gamification–—defined as the application Gamification; of game design principles in non-gaming contexts–—can be used in business. However, Experience; academic research and management practice have paid little attention to the Mechanics; challenges of how best to design, implement, manage, and optimize gamification Dynamics; strategies. To advance understanding of gamification, this article defines what it is Emotions; and explains how it prompts managers to think about business practice in new and Behavior change; innovative ways. Drawing upon the game design literature, we present a framework of Motivation; three gamification principles–—mechanics, dynamics, and emotions (MDE)–—to explain American Idol how gamified experiences can be created. We then provide an extended illustration of gamification and conclude with ideas for future research and application opportu- nities. # 2015 Kelley School of Business, Indiana University. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 1. Press play to start employees and customers with game-like incentives (e.g., competitions among financial traders, leader- Games are everywhere. We play games while trav- boards for salespeople, participation badges). eling, while relaxing, or while at work, simply to However, increasing engagement and rewarding create enjoyable experiences for ourselves and for desired behavior with such incentives has always others.
    [Show full text]