DOCSLIB.ORG

Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Clients - 2013 Based on Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Registry - 2012 to Present (Deprecated October 2015)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Clients - 2013 Based on Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Registry - 2012 to Present (Deprecated October 2015) Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Clients - 2013 Based on Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Registry - 2012 to present (Deprecated October 2015) FILING YEAR CLIENT NAME 2013 Optimo Holdings LLC 2013 North Coast Music Group, Inc 2013 Driven Solutions, LLC 2013 United Technologies Corporation 2013 Westfield Group 2013 Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corp 2013 Integrated Motor Club LLC 2013 Windfall Group 2013 Pace 2013 City Colleges of Chicago 2013 Belmont Assembly of God 2013 City Outdoor, Inc. 2013 Christian Heritage Training Center 2013 Linko, Funk 2013 SNL Realty LLC 2013 Chicago Neighborhood Initiatives 2013 PepsiCo., Inc 2013 Solstice on the Park, LLC 2013 ENVISTA 2013 YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago Page 1 of 55 10/02/2021 Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Clients - 2013 Based on Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Registry - 2012 to present (Deprecated October 2015) 2013 Wells Fargo Securities, LLC 2013 Chicago Helicopter Express 2013 Preferred - Halsted, LLC 2013 Pepsi Americas General Bottles 2013 CRM Properties Group LLC 2013 Northern Illinois Fire Sprinkler Advisory Board 2013 Great Lakes Prinicipals c/o CD-EB/EP Retail JV LLC 2013 Chicago Children's Museum 2013 Resurrection Health Care 2013 Westfield Concession Management, Inc. 2013 Howard Natinsky 2013 Inland Real EstateDevelopment corp. 2013 DirecTV, Inc. 2013 george K. baum & company 2013 Bethesda Home and Retirement Center 2013 Academy for Urban School Leadership 2013 Local 881 United Food and Commercial Workers 2013 U.S. Cost Incorporated 2013 Oyster Pail LLC 2013 Cigar Assn. of America 2013 Electrical Contractors' Association of City of Chicago 2013 West Humboldt Park Development Council Page 2 of 55 10/02/2021 Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Clients - 2013 Based on Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Registry - 2012 to present (Deprecated October 2015) 2013 PILSEN LITTLE VILLAGE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER, INC. 2013 John Buck Co. 2013 Mark IV Realty Group, Inc 2013 Focus Acquisitions, LLC 2013 Villa Capital Managers LLC 2013 Spectrum Real Estate Services, Inc 2013 Reilly, Pat 2013 ULICH Children's Advantage Network 2013 Alex Troyanovsky c/o Mokin Investments, Inc. 2013 Blinderman Construction Company, Inc. 2013 DJ Acquisitions Inc 2013 Sutherland LLC 2013 New Pisgah Baptist Church 2013 Randolph Tower City Apartments, LLC 2013 La Fournette 2013 LG Development Group 2013 ELECTRONIC KNOWLEDGE INTERCHANGE 2013 SSP America, Inc. 2013 Speedy Cash Holdings Corp. 2013 GRE DOR, LLC Page 3 of 55 10/02/2021 Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Clients - 2013 Based on Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Registry - 2012 to present (Deprecated October 2015) 2013 Breheny, Michael 2013 K. Hovnanian Homes 2013 CHICAGOLAND APARTMENT ASSOCIATION 2013 Rosenwald Courts Apartments 2013 Lawrences' Fisheries Inc 2013 Ghafari Associates LLC 2013 Mayfair Plaza 63, LLC 2013 Chicago Elite Builders, Inc c/o Sean Walsh 2013 Illinois Retail Merchants Association 2013 Clean Energy Fuels Corp. 2013 The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company 2013 Mark and Sonia Suzumoto 2013 Elderly Housing, Development and Operations Corp 2013 Ameresco Inc 2013 Lombardi, Nicholas / La Casa del Pueblo Inc 2013 Macerich 2013 Fidelity Investments Institutional Services Company, Inc 2013 General Growth Properties 2013 Sears Holdings Corporation 2013 Middlefork Capital LLC 2013 MillerCoors LLC 2013 Illinois Hotel and Lodging Association Page 4 of 55 10/02/2021 Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Clients - 2013 Based on Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Registry - 2012 to present (Deprecated October 2015) 2013 Stanley Orszula and Julie Griffiths 2013 Prologue, inc 2013 InSite Real Estate LLC 2013 MedImmune 2013 Anheuser Busch Companies 2013 Canadian National Railway 2013 Skyway Concession Company, LLC 2013 Reliable Asphalt Company 2013 ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN INTERNATIONAL 2013 HR Green, Inc. 2013 JEM Group, LLC 2013 Cai Restaurant 2013 Siebert Brandford Shank & Co., L.L.C. 2013 International Property Developers North America Inc 2013 Fifth Third Bank 2013 2650 Milwaukee LLC 2013 Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics 2013 Drs. Rana Abraham & Samer Abbas 2013 Lou Mitchell's Express, Inc 2013 The Gardner School 2013 Norfolk Southern Corporation Page 5 of 55 10/02/2021 Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Clients - 2013 Based on Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Registry - 2012 to present (Deprecated October 2015) 2013 Crescent Heights 2013 Crown Castle USA, Inc. 2013 Poonja, Ali & Faisal 2013 Mesirow Financial, Inc. 2013 Fakhoury, Khaldoun 2013 U.S. Cost Inc. 2013 Medstar Laboratory 2013 320 South Michigan Restaurant LLC 2013 Infor 2013 JCDecaux North America, Inc 2013 Ditka's Restaurant 2013 EZPAWN, Illinois, Inc 2013 American Progressive Bag Alliance 2013 Oliver Valenzuela 2013 Chicagoland Speedway 2013 Central States Ticket Brokers Assn. 2013 Integrated System International d%2fb%2fa ISI Energy Controls 2013 Loukas, Michael 2013 Pullman Park Development LLC 2013 Illinois Transportation Trade Association Page 6 of 55 10/02/2021 Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Clients - 2013 Based on Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Registry - 2012 to present (Deprecated October 2015) 2013 InTime Solutions 2013 ComEd 2013 Rosenwald Court Apartments 2013 Unite Here 2013 Mike Media Group, Inc 2013 Franklin Point Equities LLC 2013 Xerox Business Services, LLC 2013 Triangle Property Holdings, LLC 2013 Pradeep Patel 2013 Wrigley Rooftop Management Corp 2013 Campus Acquisitions, LLC 2013 Origin Capital Partners 2013 Chicago Carriage Cab Company 2013 Paladin Marketing Resources, Inc 2013 Credit Suisse Asset Management LLC 2013 Open Books 2013 Janus Capital Management LLC 2013 Blommer Chocolate Company 2013 Breathable Baby LLC 2013 Total Outdoor 2013 RedFlex Traffic Systems 2013 Bridgeview Bank & Trust Page 7 of 55 10/02/2021 Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Clients - 2013 Based on Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Registry - 2012 to present (Deprecated October 2015) 2013 Greater Southwest Development Corporation 2013 Federation of Women Contractors 2013 Safe Harbor Energy Resources 2013 Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC 2013 Sutherland, Mark 2013 Hudson Group 2013 Delta Dental of Illinois 2013 Siemens Industry Inc. 2013 Ansaldo STS USA, Inc 2013 Institute for Justice 2013 Illinois Bankers Assoc. 2013 TKG & Associates 2013 LYFE KITCHEN 2013 Rush University Medical Center 2013 The Mid 2013 BNY Mellon 2013 Sneed, Kyle 2013 1100 E 47th St. LLC 2013 Citibank, N.A. 2013 Mondelez Global LLC 2013 Tamvakis, George Page 8 of 55 10/02/2021 Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Clients - 2013 Based on Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Registry - 2012 to present (Deprecated October 2015) 2013 Gutierrez, Amalio 2013 Building Owners and Managers Association of Chicago 2013 Johnson Controls, Inc 2013 AG/CP West Bradley LLC 2013 Bank of America Corporation 2013 First Southwest Company 2013 St. Edmunds Redevelopment Corporation 2013 RMK Pulaski LLC 2013 CSX Corporation 2013 Bank of America NA 2013 Scottsdale Limited Partnership 2013 Motorola Solutions 2013 Barr, Richard 2013 Vector Media 2013 Shoreline Sightseeing 2013 Belmont-Central Chamber of Commerce 2013 Argo Tea 2013 Van Wagner Chicago, LLC 2013 YC20 LLC 2013 Construction Cost Systems, Inc. 2013 AT&T Illinois Page 9 of 55 10/02/2021 Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Clients - 2013 Based on Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Registry - 2012 to present (Deprecated October 2015) 2013 Irene Petri 2013 AMLI Residential / 900 South Clark Associates, LLC 2013 HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION 2013 Brinshore Development 2013 Wirtz Realty Corp 2013 Northwestern Capital Investment Partners, LLC 2013 Saul, Brad 2013 Citibank, NA 2013 Olympic South, Inc 2013 Somerset Place Realty LLC 2013 Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc. 2013 Bigane Paving Company 2013 Dish Network LLC 2013 Fordham Condominium Assoc. 2013 Monster Energy Company 2013 Heartland Cafe, LLC 2013 Christy Webber Landscapes 2013 AGB Investigative Services, Inc. 2013 Dynasty Group 2013 Friedman Properties 2013 River Bend Real Estate Investments, LLC Page 10 of55 10/02/2021 Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Clients - 2013 Based on Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Registry - 2012 to present (Deprecated October 2015) 2013 Richlind Corporation 2013 Boston Market Corporation 2013 CAA Hotel Owner LLC, c/o AJ Capital Partners LLC 2013 Northern Trust Corporation 2013 Teamsters Joint Council #25 2013 JCDecaux Airport Chicago, LLC 2013 Server Farm Realty LLC 2013 KPMG LLP 2013 Image Media Advertising, Inc 2013 Rice Financial Products Co. 2013 River Point LLC 2013 Premium Builders, Ltd. 2013 Wendy's Company 2013 Lebenthal & Co LLC 2013 South Chicago Packing Co 2013 Chicago Chop Shop LLC 2013 Verrus Mobile Technologies 2013 Utility Service Partners, Inc. 2013 NJOY, Inc. 2013 Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC 2013 Wright Advertising Page 11 of55 10/02/2021 Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Clients - 2013 Based on Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Registry - 2012 to present (Deprecated October 2015) 2013 Intermedix Corp 2013 CobbleSquare Place Associates, II 2013 Exelon Generation - Constellation Energy 2013 Emily's Limousine Service Co. 2013 Begyle Brewing, LLC 2013 AT&T 2013 Steans Family Foundation 2013 Standard Parking 2013 Republic Services & Allied Waste Transportation Inc 2013 Cambodian Association of Illinois 2013 Presence Health System 2013 Smart Hotels/Olympia Chicago LLC 2013 YC29 LLC 2013 Temco Machinery, Inc. 2013 Sterling Bay Companies 2013 Riot Fest Corporation 2013 Xerox State & Local Solutions 2013 Metropolis Investment Holdings 2013 1010 Lakeshore Association 2013 Sun Financial 2013 G A Paving L.L.C. Page 12 of55 10/02/2021 Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Clients - 2013 Based on Lobbyist Data - Lobbyist Registry - 2012 to present (Deprecated October 2015) 2013 Project Development Services Inc 2013
Load more

Recommended publications
  • June 2020 Project Management Oversight Report
    Project Management Oversight June 2020 REPORT ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT – JUNE 2020 Executive Summary This semi‐annual Report on Project Management Oversight details Service Board efforts in implementing their capital programs. Included are details on all state‐funded projects, regardless of budget, and all systemwide projects with budgets of $10 million or more, regardless of funding source. Information in this report was collected by direct interviews, project meetings, and documented submissions from Service Board project management teams. The RTA’s 2018‐2023 Regional Transit Strategic Plan, Invest in Transit, highlights $30 billion of projects that are needed to maintain and modernize the region’s transit network. To maintain and preserve the current system in a State of Good Repair (SGR), as well as address the backlog of deferred SGR projects, requires a capital investment of $2 to $3 billion per year. The Rebuild Illinois funding is planned to expedite overdue repair and replacement projects, reduce the backlog of deferred improvements, and move the system toward a state of good repair. It nearly doubles the previous five‐year regional capital program of $4.3 billion. The new funds enable real progress on the state of good repair, by allowing improvements and in some cases replace aging system assets. Due to the current events, there is a level of uncertainty around the PAYGO and State Bond funding, which is dependent on revenues that may not reach the previously projected levels in the current economy. At this time the Service Boards are continuing with the implementation of their capital programs and working through the grant application process for the Rebuild Illinois funding.
    [Show full text]
  • EFFICIENT Frontiernews & Updates Pg
    Click on article title to INSIDE THIS ISSUE jump to that page. SPECIALTHE REPORTS EDUCATION Editor’s Note pg. 2 Book Club pg. 10 25th Annual Dinner pg. 2-4 Investing in Senior Housing pg. 11 EFFICIENT FRONTIERNews & Updates pg. 11 SOCIAL EVENTS Educational Initiative: CFA Institute Research Multi-Group Networking Challenge Kicked Off In Chicago pg. 12 Happy Hour at Rivers pg. 5 Panel Discussion: Entitlements, Austerity, 7th Annual Golf Outing pg. 5 & 6 Taxes, and the Mortgage Crisis pg. 13 Poker Night and Networking at Scoozi pg. 6 CFA Society of Chicago Events Calendar pg. 7 MEMBERSHIP CFA Society of Chicago Career Progress – LUNCHEON PROGRAMS 134 N. LaSalle St. – Suite 1740 Personal News from the Workplace pg. 14 Chicago, IL 60602 Mark Anson, CFA pg. 7 Welcome New Members pg. 14 Leland Clemons on ETFs pg. 8 312-251-1301 Don Civgin CFO pg. 8 & 9 email: [email protected] Integrys Energy Group pg. 9 www.cfachicago.org THE EFFICIENT FRONTIER FALL ISSUE 2011 For our members: Free Career Management Events Written by: Heather Brilliant, CFA As we launch into 2012, setting goals and making plans for the new During these tumultuous economic times, I appreciate these year – both professionally and personally - I’d like to look back at successes and look forward to providing additional member some of the accomplishments of 2011. This year CFA Chicago grew benefits in 2012 as we continue to deliver quality career and membership to more than 4,000, hosted more than 60 events, and education events for our members. In this tough environment, I’m attracted top-notch speakers including Jeffrey Gundlach, Professor pleased to announce our biggest headline: career management Jeremy Siegel (who helped us attract nearly 800 guests to the 25th events will be FREE for all members through June 30, 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin Public Service Corporation Address of Principal Place of Business: 700 North Adams Street, P
    MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT OF ELECTRIC UTILITIES (MAJOR AND NON-MAJOR) This form is authorized by 1919 PA 419, as amended, being MCL 460.55 et seq.; and 1969 PA 306, as amended, being MCL 24.201 et seq. Filing of this form is mandatory. Failure to complete and submit this form will place you violation of state law. Report submitted for year ending: December 31, 2016 Present name of respondent: Wisconsin Public Service Corporation Address of principal place of business: 700 North Adams Street, P. O. Box 19001, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54307‐9001 Utility representative to whom inquires regarding this report may be directed: Name:Scott J. Maas Title: Controller‐ Corp Services Address: 700 North Adams Street, P. O. Box 19001 City:Green Bay State: WI Zip: 54307‐9001 Telephone, Including Area Code: (920) 433‐1421 If the utility name has been changed during the past year: Prior Name: Date of Change: Two copies of the published annual report to stockholders: []were forwarded to the Commission []will be forwarded to the Commission on or about Annual reports to stockholders: []are published [X] are not published FOR ASSISTANCE IN COMPLETION OF THIS FORM: Contact the Michigan Public Service Commission (Heather Cantin) at (517) 284-8266 or [email protected] OR forward correspondence to: Michigan Public Service Commission Financial Analysis & Audit Division (Heather Cantin) 7109 W Saginaw Hwy PO Box 30221 Lansing, MI 48909 MPSC FORM P‐521 (01‐15) INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT To The Board of Directors of Wisconsin Public Service Corporation Milwaukee, Wisconsin We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Wisconsin Public Service Corporation (the "Company"), which comprise the balance sheet — regulatory basis as of December 31, 2016, and the related statements of income — regulatory basis, retained earnings — regulatory basis, and cash flows — regulatory basis for the year then ended, included on pages 110 through 123 of the accompanying Michigan Public Service Commission Form P-521, and the related notes to the financial statements.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2019 Project Management Oversight Report
    REPORT ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT – JUNE 2019 Executive Summary This semi‐annual Report on Project Management Oversight details Service Board efforts in implementing their capital programs. Included are details on all state‐funded projects, regardless of budget, and all systemwide projects with budgets of $10 million or more, regardless of funding source. Information in this report was collected by direct interviews, project meetings, and documented submissions from Service Board project management teams. The RTA’s 2018‐2023 Regional Transit Strategic Plan, “Invest in Transit,” highlights $30 billion of projects that are needed to maintain and modernize the region’s transit network. To maintain and preserve the current system in a State of Good Repair (SGR), as well as address the backlog of deferred SGR projects, requires a capital investment of $2 to $3 billion per year. After nearly a decade without a State of Illinois capital program, transit in the RTA region will get a much‐needed infusion from the Rebuild Illinois bill passed on June 1, 2019 by the General Assembly. The RTA is looking forward to the implementation of this new state capital plan however there is a concern that the proposed funding for transit does not meet the current needs as identified in “Invest in Transit.” The 55 projects detailed in this report together represent $5,712,260,030 worth of construction, maintenance, and procurement. Many of these projects address outstanding capital needs, while others are directed toward compliance with federal requirements or enhancing customer experience, safety, and security. All of the state funded projects are within budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Pacific North Line Bridges Environmental Review
    ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Metra Union Pacific North Line Bridges Chicago, Illinois Metra Project Number: 2112 Prepared for: Metra 547 W. Jackson Boulevard Chicago, IL 60661-5717 Prepared by: V3 Companies of Illinois 7325 Janes Avenue Woodridge, IL 60517 February 4, 2011 Revised June 7, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0Introduction 1 2.0 Need for and Description of Proposed Action 2 3.0 Alternatives to the Proposed Action 3 4.0 Screening of Environmental Factors 4 5.0 Factors Requiring Further Analysis and/or Documentation 11 5.1 Noise and Vibration 11 5.2 Historic Properties and Parklands 19 5.3 Construction 19 5.4Aesthetics 21 5.5 Community Disruption 21 5.6 Hazardous Materials 22 6.0 Environmental Justice 25 6.1 Introduction 25 6.2Definitions 26 6.3Methodology 26 7.0 List of Agencies and Persons Contacted 28 8.0Summary 28 LIST OF TABLES Page Table 4.1 Summary Table of Environmental Factors 4 Table 5.1 Noise Impact Assessment at Rogers Park Montessori School 13 Table 5.2 Noise Impact Assessment at Nearest Ends of the 13 Two Side Townhome Buildings Table 5.3 Noise Impact Assessment at Middle Townhouse Building 14 Table 5.4 Environmental Regulatory Review for Sites near or 23 Adjacent To the Project Limits Table 6.1 Census Data 27 Table 7.1 Agencies and Persons Contacted 28 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Exhibits · Figure 1: Site Location Map · Figure 2: Architect¶s Rendering of Ravenswood Station Improvements · Figure 3: Zoning Map · Figure 4: Noise Receptor Location Map · Figure 5: National Wetland Inventory Map i · Figure 6: Flood Insurance Rate Map · Figure 7: Site Photographs Appendix B Agency Coordination · Illinois Department of Natural Resources · U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • NACD Public Company Full Board Members
    NACD Public Company Full Board Members: Rank | Company Rank | Company Rank | Company Rank | Company A.O. Smith Corp. Analog Devices Bridge Housing Corporation Clearwire Corp. AAA Club Partners Ansys, Inc. Briggs & Stratton Corp. Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. AARP Foundation Apogee Enterprises, Inc. Brightpoint, Inc. Cloud Peak Energy Inc. Aastrom Biosciences, Inc. Apollo Group, Inc. Bristow Group Inc. CME Group Acadia Realty Trust Applied Industrial Technologies, Broadwind Energy CoBiz, Inc. ACI Worldwide, Inc. Inc. Brookdale Senior Living Inc. Coherent, Inc. Acme Packet, Inc. Approach Resources, Inc. Bryn Mawr Bank Corporation Coinstar, Inc. Active Power, Inc. ArcelorMittal Buckeye Partners L.P. Colgate-Palmolive Co. ADA-ES, Inc. Arch Coal, Inc. Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. Collective Brands, Inc. Adobe Systems, Inc. Archer Daniels Midland Co. Bunge Limited Commercial Metals Co. Advance Auto Parts ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. CA Holding Community Health Systems Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. Arkansas Blue Cross Blue Shield CACI International, Inc. Compass Minerals Aerosonic Corp. Arlington Asset Investment Corp. Cal Dive International, Inc. Comverse Technology, Inc. Aetna, Inc. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. Calamos Asset Management, Inc. Conmed Corp. AFC Enterprises, Inc. Asbury Automobile Cameco Corp. Connecticut Water Service, Inc. AG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc. Aspen Technology, Inc. Cameron ConocoPhillips Agilent Technologies Associated Banc-Corp.5 Campbell Soup Co. CONSOL Energy Inc. Air Methods Corp. Assurant, Inc. Capella Education Co. Consolidated Edison Co. Alacer Gold Corp. Assured Guaranty Ltd. Capital One Financial Corp. Consolidated Graphics, Inc. Alaska Air Group, Inc. ATMI Capstead Mortgage Corp. Consolidated Water Co., Ltd. Alaska Communication Systems Atwood Oceanics, Inc. Cardtronics, Inc. Continental Resources, Inc. Group, Inc. Auxilium Pharmaceuticals Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Q3 2011 Chicago DT Office-Market Report V2.Indd
    Q3 2011 | DOWNTOWN OFFICE RESEARCH REPORT | THIRD QUARTER 2011 | DOWNTOWN CHICAGO | OFFICE CHICAGO OFFICE MARKET OVERVIEW Stable But Vulnerable Six consecutive quarters of positive demand in the Chicago CBD offi ce market would seem to insinuate a sustained recovery is on the horizon. Yet, despite vacancy rate decreases, the market remains in a vulnerable state, precariously teetering between stabilization and a second round of market softening. An unmistakable dichotomy exists in the market, with a strong divide in fundamentals based upon tenant size and asset quality. This dynamic has essentially resulted in two contrasting markets within MARKET INDICATORS the CBD – one with fi rming rental rates and constrained space options and another showing an Overall Chicago CBD abundance of availabilities and depressed market conditions. 3Q10 3Q11 Smaller tenants, defi ned as those occupying less than 25,000 square feet of space, are still benefi ting VACANCY RATE 16.1% 15.6% from a plethora of space options and landlords of buildings with high vacancy continue to compete aggressively for these tenants. This segment of the market remains a “tenant’s market” where rents ABSORPTION (SF) -378,946 582,266 and concessions are typically tenant-favorable. On the contrary, larger tenants are experiencing a RENTS $32.14 $31.32 lack of quality space options, resulting in a tightening market with fi rming rental rates. Additionally, over the last two years, an opportunity has existed for tenants to upgrade to higher quality buildings INVENTORY 140,514,843 140,514,843 at reduced pricing. As this fl ight to quality continues, the gap between top-tier Class A space and its Class B and C counterparts continues to widen, further segmenting the market.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2020 Project Management Oversight Report
    Project Management Oversight December 2020 REPORT ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT – DECEMBER 2020 Executive Summary This semi‐annual Report on Project Management Oversight details Service Board efforts in implementing their capital programs. Included are details on all state‐funded projects, regardless of budget, and all systemwide projects with budgets of $10 million or more, regardless of funding source. Information in this report was collected by direct , interviews project meetings, and documented submissions from Service Board project management teams. The RTA’s 2018‐2023 Regional Transit Strategic Plan, Invest in Transit, highlights $30 billion of projects that are needed to maintain and modernize the region’s transit network. To maintain and preserve the current system in a State of Good Repair (SGR), as well as address the backlog of deferred SGR projects, requires a capital investment of $2 to $3 billion per year. The Rebuild Illinois funding is planned to expedite overdue repair and replacement projects, reduce the backlog of deferred improvements, and move the system toward a state of good repair. It nearly doubles the previous five‐year regional capital program of $4.3 billion. The funds enable real progress on the state of good repair, by allowing improvements and in some cases replace aging system assets. Although this has been a difficult year due to operating funding shortfalls related to COVID‐19, the Service Boards are continuing with the implementation of their capital programs. This report includes, for the first time, 13 Rebuild Illinois projects representing $655 million in Rebuild Illinois funding. The 13 projects reported on have begun during this reporting period and have ongoing activities.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2018 Project Management Oversight Report
    June 2018 Project Management Oversight Prepared by the Department of Finance, Innovation & Technology REPORT ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT – JUNE 2018 Executive Summary This semi‐annual Report on Project Management Oversight details Service Board efforts in implementing their capital programs. Included are details on all state‐funded projects, regardless of budget, and all systemwide projects with budgets of $10 million or more, regardless of funding source. Information in this report was collected by direct interviews, project meetings, and documented submissions from Service Board project management teams. The State of Good Repair backlog for the region currently stands at $19.4 billion, and the 10‐ year capital need for normal reinvestment is $18.3 billion, which results in total 10‐year capital need of $37.7 billion. The 60 projects detailed in this report together represent $3,861,547,183 worth of construction, maintenance, and procurement. Many of these projects will address outstanding capital needs, while others are directed to compliance with federal requirements or enhancing customer experience, safety, and security. The majority of state funded projects are within budget, one project is under budget. 80% of the state funded projects are on schedule. Regarding change orders, some of the added budget came from decisions by the Service Boards to add value to projects or comply with federal requirements. Other change orders were mostly for unforeseen conditions, and a minimal amount was due to errors and omissions. There were also change orders that provided credit for value engineering and for unused allowance and deleted work. Although the progress being made on these projects is significant, current capital funding will not support much needed renewal of the region’s aging transit infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • First Name Last Name Company Title
    First Name Last Name Company Title Jerry Golden 3-GIS, LLC Chief Operating officer Alex Davies 3M Company Brendan Kennedy 3M Company Mower & Asssociates - PR Brian Brooks 3M Electrical Markets Division Lab Randy Flamm 3M Electrical Markets Division Sales David Iverson 3M Electrical Markets Division Lab Jane Kovacs 3M Electrical Markets Division PR Manager Lynette Lawson 3M Electrical Markets Division Marketing Kevin Pfaum 3M Electrical Markets Division Trade Show Mgr. Ed Scott 3M Electrical Markets Division Marketing Steve Willett 3M Electrical Markets Division Lab Corey Willson 3M Electrical Markets Division Sales Sinan Yordem 3M Electrical Markets Division Lab Tony Althaus A. Y. McDonald Mfg. Co. National Gas Sales Manager Nate Harbin A. Y. McDonald Mfg. Co. Midwest Gas Products Territory Manager Shannon Bromley A+ Corporation Product Manager Mark Imboden ABB, Inc. Channel Partner Manager Scott Peterson ABB, Inc. U.S. Sales manager Burton Reed ABB, Inc. Business Development Manager Brad Steer Accela Inc Sales Rep. Quan Vu Accela Right of Way Management Sales Rep Peter Johansson Accudyne Industries Executive Vice President David Bettinghaus Advance Engineering Corp. Regional Sales Manager Thomas Brown Advance Engineering Corp. President Martin Malcolm Advance Engineering Corporation Larry Head AECOM National Practice Leader, Gas Utilities Carrie Kozyrski AECOM Project Manager Mike Musial AECOM Director of Energy Services Steven Petto AECOM Alternative Delivery Manager, Power & Industrial James Savaiano AECOM Project Manager Scot Macomber
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is Most Impacted by the New Lease Accounting Standards?
    Who is Most Impacted by the New Lease Accounting Standards? An Analysis of the Fortune 500’s Leasing Obligations What Do Corporations Lease? Many companies lease (rather than buy) much of the equipment and real estate they use to run their business. Many of the office buildings, warehouses, retail stores or manufacturing plants companies run their operations from are leased. Many of the forklifts, trucks, computers and data center equipment companies use to run their business is leased. Leasing has many benefits. Cash flow is one. Instead of outlaying $300,000 to buy five trucks today you can make a series of payments over the next four years to lease them. You can then deploy the cash you saved towards other investments that appreciate in value. Also, regular replacement of older technology with the latest and greatest technology increases productivity and profitability. Instead of buying a server to use in your data center for five years, you can lease the machines and get a new replacement every three years. If you can return the equipment on time, you are effectively outsourcing the monetization of the residual value in the equipment to an expert third-party, the leasing company. Another benefit of leasing is the accounting, specifically the way the leases are reported on financial statements such as annual reports (10-Ks). Today, under the current ASC 840 standard, leases are classified as capital leases or operating leases. Capital leases are reported on the balance sheet. Operating leases are disclosed in the footnotes of your financial statements as “off balance sheet” operating expenses and excluded from important financial ratios such as Return on Assets that investors use to judge a company’s performance.
    [Show full text]
  • For Hire: Lobbyists Or the 99%? How Corporations Pay More for Lobbyists Than in Taxes
    For Hire: Lobbyists or the 99%? How Corporations Pay More for Lobbyists Than in Taxes A report by Public Campaign December 2011 Executive Summary Amidst a growing federal deficit and widespread economic insecurity for most Americans, some of the largest corporations in the country have avoided paying their fair share in taxes while spending millions to lobby Congress and influence elections. This report builds on a recent report on corporate tax dodging by Citizens for Tax Justice by examining lobbying expenditure data provided by the Center for Responsive Politics. We also look at publicly available data on job creation, federal campaign contributions, and executive compensation, to understand how these corporations have been spending their cash. Key Findings • The thirty big corporations analyzed in this report paid more to lobby Congress than they paid in federal income taxes for the three years between 2008 and 2010, despite being profitable. • Despite making combined profits totally $164 billion in that three-year period, the 30 companies combined received tax rebates totaling nearly $11 billion. • Altogether, these companies spent nearly half a billion dollars ($476 million) over three years to lobby Congress—that’s about $400,000 each day, including weekends. • In the three-year period beginning in 2009 through most of 2011, these large firms spent over $22 million altogether on federal campaigns. • These corporations have also spent lavishly on compensation for their top executives ($706 million altogether in 2010). Introduction Over the past few months, a growing Table 1. Three-Year Totals for U.S. Profits, Federal Income protest movement has shifted the Taxes Paid, and Lobbying Expenses, in Millions (2008-2010) debate about economic inequality in Company U.S.
    [Show full text]