DOCSLIB.ORG

Site Profile of the South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Site Profile of the South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve The Ecology of the South Slough Estuary: Site Profile of the South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve Steven S. Rumrill South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve Charleston, Oregon The Ecology of the South Slough Estuary: Site Profile of the South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Steven S. Rumrill South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve Charleston, Oregon The Ecology of the South Slough Estuary: Site Profile of the South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve The Ecology of the South Slough Estuary: Site Profile of the South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve THE ECOLOGY OF THE SOUTH SLOUGH ESTUARY, OREGON: SITE PROFILE OF A NATIONAL ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE Steven S. Rumrill South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... i LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................. x ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................. xii PREFACE ................................................................................................................. xiii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE SOUTH SLOUGH ESTUARY 1.1 Coastal Components of the Lower Columbia Bioregion .................................. 1 1.1.1 Geological Setting ....................................................................................... 4 1.1.2 Coastal Climate, Ocean Currents and Upwelling ........................................ 6 1.1.3 Diversity of Habitats and Biotic Communities............................................ 10 1.2 Estuaries in the Lower Columbia Bioregion ...................................................... 14 1.2.1 Definition and Classification of Estuaries.................................................... 14 1.2.2 Regional Estuarine Management Concerns ................................................. 16 1.3 Coos Watershed and Estuary .............................................................................. 18 1.3.1 Physical Description of the Coos Estuary .................................................... 19 1.3.2 Biotic Resources of the Coos Estuary .......................................................... 24 1.4 South Slough Watershed and the South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve ....................................................................... 27 1.4.1 South Slough Watershed and Estuary .......................................................... 27 1.4.2 Recognition and Designation as a National Estuarine Research Reserve...... 30 1.4.3 South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve ..................................... 32 CHAPTER 2. GEOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 2.1 Coastal Geology within the Charleston Quadrangle......................................... 37 2.1.1 Coastal Tectonic Setting .............................................................................. 37 2.1.2 Geologic History of the South Slough Watershed ....................................... 37 2.1.3 Quaternary Geologic History ...................................................................... 42 2.1.4 Formation of Buried Peat Layers ................................................................. 43 2.1.5 Geomorphology of the South Slough Tidal Inlet ......................................... 45 2.1.6 Recent Alterations to the Geomorphology of the Tidal Channels................ 48 2.2 Regional and Local Climate Conditions ............................................................ 48 2.2.1 Seasonal Temperature, Precipitation, and Wind Patterns ............................. 48 2.2.2 Pulsed Storm Events .................................................................................... 49 2.3 Soils in the South Slough Watershed.................................................................. 50 2.3.1 Soils in Upland Forested Areas .................................................................... 51 2.3.2 Riparian Areas, Wetlands, and Saltmarshes.................................................. 52 2.3.3 Tideflats and Sandflats ................................................................................ 52 2.3.4 Subtidal Channel Sediments ....................................................................... 55 i The Ecology of the South Slough Estuary: Site Profile of the South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve 2.4 Hydrology of the South Slough Watershed ........................................................ 55 2.4.1 Principal Streams and Freshwater Inputs ..................................................... 55 2.4.2 Tidal Dynamics and Circulation Patterns.................................................... 59 2.5 Physiochemical Characteristics of the South Slough Estuary ........................... 64 2.5.1 Temperature and Salinity Cycles ................................................................. 64 2.5.2 Dissolved Oxygen and pH levels ................................................................. 68 2.5.3 Nutrients, Turbidity, and Dissolved Solids .................................................. 68 2.5.4 Water Quality within the South Slough Estuary.......................................... 70 2.5.5 Sediment Contaminants.............................................................................. 73 2.6 Accretion of Sediments in the South Slough Estuary ........................................ 74 2.7 Watershed Land Use and Ownership ................................................................. 74 CHAPTER 3. ESTUARINE HABITATS AND COMMUNITIES 3.1 Habitat Classification Scheme within the South Slough Estuary ..................... 77 3.2 Open Water and the Estuarine Water Column .................................................. 78 3.2.1 Estuarine Phytoplankton and Protist Communities .................................... 78 3.2.2 Neustonic Layer .......................................................................................... 82 3.2.3 Zooplankton Communities ......................................................................... 83 3.2.4 Nekton and Midwater Fish ......................................................................... 86 3.3 Tidal Channels and Subtidal Habitat................................................................. 91 3.3.1 Subtidal Macroalgae .................................................................................... 92 3.3.2 Subtidal and Sublittoral Invertebrates.......................................................... 92 3.3.3 Resident and Migratory Fish ....................................................................... 98 3.4 Sandflat and Mudflat Habitats ........................................................................... 105 3.4.1 Benthic Microphyton Communities and the Redox Potential Discontinuity 105 3.4.2 Eelgrass Communities ................................................................................. 109 3.4.3 Macrobenthic Algae and Seaweed Communities ......................................... 114 3.4.4 Meiofauna and Infaunal Invertebrates ......................................................... 116 3.4.5 Epibenthic Invertebrates.............................................................................. 133 3.5 Ecological Interactions within Estuarine Communities.................................... 133 3.5.1 Interspecific Interactions among Pacific Ghost Shrimp, Infaunal Invertebrates, and Predatory Sculpins.......................................................... 133 3.5.2 Alteration of Eelgrass Community Structure by Mariculture of Pacific Oysters .... 135 3.5.3 Regrowth and Recovery of Eelgrass Communities ....................................... 137 3.5.4 Diet and Ecological Role of Cutthroat Trout in Estuarine Tidal Channels .. 140 3.6 Introduction and Spread of Non-Indigenous Species........................................ 141 3.6.1 Extent of Estuarine Invasions by Non-Indigenous Aquatic Species.............. 141 3.6.2 Colonization of Tideflats by European Green Crabs.................................... 145 3.6.3 Spread and Community Alteration by Japanese Eelgrass ............................. 145 3.6.4 Future Management of Non-Indigenous Species in the South Slough Estuary .. 148 3.7 Emergent Saltmarshes ......................................................................................... 149 3.7.1 Geomorphology of South Slough Salt Marshes ........................................... 149 3.7.2 Emergent Salt Marsh Vegetation Communities ........................................... 150 3.7.3 Salt Marsh Invertebrates .............................................................................. 153 3.7.4 Ecological Importance of Salt Marshes ........................................................ 154 3.8 Hard Substrata and Anthropogenic Habitats .................................................... 155 3.9 Migratory Birds and Waterfowl .......................................................................... 158 3.10 Use of Estuarine Habitats by Mammals ............................................................. 159 ii The Ecology of the South Slough Estuary: Site Profile of the South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve CHAPTER 4. RIPARIAN COMMUNITIES AND UPLAND HABITATS 4.1 Riparian Habitats and Upland Forests in the Oregon Coast Range ................. 163 4.2 Riparian Habitats and Communities
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontiers in Zoology Biomed Central
    Frontiers in Zoology BioMed Central Research Open Access Functional chloroplasts in metazoan cells - a unique evolutionary strategy in animal life Katharina Händeler*1, Yvonne P Grzymbowski1, Patrick J Krug2 and Heike Wägele1 Address: 1Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany and 2Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Los Angeles, California, 90032-8201, USA Email: Katharina Händeler* - [email protected]; Yvonne P Grzymbowski - [email protected]; Patrick J Krug - [email protected]; Heike Wägele - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 1 December 2009 Received: 26 June 2009 Accepted: 1 December 2009 Frontiers in Zoology 2009, 6:28 doi:10.1186/1742-9994-6-28 This article is available from: http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/6/1/28 © 2009 Händeler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: Among metazoans, retention of functional diet-derived chloroplasts (kleptoplasty) is known only from the sea slug taxon Sacoglossa (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia). Intracellular maintenance of plastids in the slug's digestive epithelium has long attracted interest given its implications for understanding the evolution of endosymbiosis. However, photosynthetic ability varies widely among sacoglossans; some species have no plastid retention while others survive for months solely on photosynthesis. We present a molecular phylogenetic hypothesis for the Sacoglossa and a survey of kleptoplasty from representatives of all major clades. We sought to quantify variation in photosynthetic ability among lineages, identify phylogenetic origins of plastid retention, and assess whether kleptoplasty was a key character in the radiation of the Sacoglossa.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017
    Washington Natural Heritage Program List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017 The following list of animals known from Washington is complete for resident and transient vertebrates and several groups of invertebrates, including odonates, branchipods, tiger beetles, butterflies, gastropods, freshwater bivalves and bumble bees. Some species from other groups are included, especially where there are conservation concerns. Among these are the Palouse giant earthworm, a few moths and some of our mayflies and grasshoppers. Currently 857 vertebrate and 1,100 invertebrate taxa are included. Conservation status, in the form of range-wide, national and state ranks are assigned to each taxon. Information on species range and distribution, number of individuals, population trends and threats is collected into a ranking form, analyzed, and used to assign ranks. Ranks are updated periodically, as new information is collected. We welcome new information for any species on our list. Common Name Scientific Name Class Global Rank State Rank State Status Federal Status Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile Amphibia G5 S5 Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum Amphibia G5 S5 Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Amphibia G5 S3 Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii Amphibia G5 S5 Dunn's Salamander Plethodon dunni Amphibia G4 S3 C Larch Mountain Salamander Plethodon larselli Amphibia G3 S3 S Van Dyke's Salamander Plethodon vandykei Amphibia G3 S3 C Western Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum Amphibia G5 S5 Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa
    [Show full text]
  • Adhesion and Cohesion
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation International Journal of Dentistry Volume 2012, Article ID 951324, 8 pages doi:10.1155/2012/951324 Review Article Adhesion and Cohesion J. Anthony von Fraunhofer School of Dentistry, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA Correspondence should be addressed to J. Anthony von Fraunhofer, [email protected] Received 18 October 2011; Accepted 14 November 2011 Academic Editor: Cornelis H. Pameijer Copyright © 2012 J. Anthony von Fraunhofer. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The phenomena of adhesion and cohesion are reviewed and discussed with particular reference to dentistry. This review considers the forces involved in cohesion and adhesion together with the mechanisms of adhesion and the underlying molecular processes involved in bonding of dissimilar materials. The forces involved in surface tension, surface wetting, chemical adhesion, dispersive adhesion, diffusive adhesion, and mechanical adhesion are reviewed in detail and examples relevant to adhesive dentistry and bonding are given. Substrate surface chemistry and its influence on adhesion, together with the properties of adhesive materials, are evaluated. The underlying mechanisms involved in adhesion failure are covered. The relevance of the adhesion zone and its impor- tance with regard to adhesive dentistry and bonding to enamel and dentin is discussed. 1. Introduction molecular attraction by which the particles of a body are uni- ted throughout the mass. In other words, adhesion is any at- Every clinician has experienced the failure of a restoration, be traction process between dissimilar molecular species, which it loosening of a crown, loss of an anterior Class V restora- have been brought into direct contact such that the adhesive tion, or leakage of a composite restoration.
    [Show full text]
  • Bankia Setacea Class: Bivalvia, Heterodonta, Euheterodonta
    Phylum: Mollusca Bankia setacea Class: Bivalvia, Heterodonta, Euheterodonta Order: Imparidentia, Myida The northwest or feathery shipworm Family: Pholadoidea, Teredinidae, Bankiinae Taxonomy: The original binomen for Bankia the presence of long siphons. Members of setacea was Xylotrya setacea, described by the family Teredinidae are modified for and Tryon in 1863 (Turner 1966). William Leach distiguished by a wood-boring mode of life described several molluscan genera, includ- (Sipe et al. 2000), pallets at the siphon tips ing Xylotrya, but how his descriptions were (see Plate 394C, Coan and Valentich-Scott interpreted varied. Although Menke be- 2007) and distinct anterior shell indentation. lieved Xylotrya to be a member of the Phola- They are commonly called shipworms (though didae, Gray understood it as a member of they are not worms at all!) and bore into many the Terdinidae and synonyimized it with the wooden structures. The common name ship- genus Bankia, a genus designated by the worm is based on their vermiform morphology latter author in 1842. Most authors refer to and a shell that only covers the anterior body Bankia setacea (e.g. Kozloff 1993; Sipe et (Ricketts and Calvin 1952; see images in al. 2000; Coan and Valentich-Scott 2007; Turner 1966). Betcher et al. 2012; Borges et al. 2012; Da- Body: Bizarrely modified bivalve with re- vidson and de Rivera 2012), although one duced, sub-globular body. For internal anato- recent paper sites Xylotrya setacea (Siddall my, see Fig. 1, Canadian…; Fig. 1 Betcher et et al. 2009). Two additional known syno- al. 2012. nyms exist currently, including Bankia Color: osumiensis, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Dean Oz/Μ: ;Z: Date
    The evolutionary history of reproductive strategies in sculpins of the subfamily oligocottinae Item Type Thesis Authors Buser, Thaddaeus J. Download date 26/09/2021 18:39:58 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/4549 THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES IN SCULPINS OF THE SUBFAMILY OLIGOCOTTINAE By Thaddaeus J. Buser RECOMMENDED: Dr. Anne Beaudreau Dr. J. Andres Lopez Advisory Committee Chair Dr. Shannon Atkinson Fisheries Division Graduate Program Chair APPROVED: Dr. Michael Castellini ·. John Eichel erger Dean oZ/µ:_;z: Date THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES IN SCULPINS OF THE SUBFAMILY OLIGOCOTTINAE A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the University of Alaska Fairbanks in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Title Page MASTER OF SCIENCE By Thaddaeus J. Buser, B.Sc. Fairbanks, Alaska May 2014 v Abstract The sculpin subfamily Oligocottinae is a group of 17 nearshore species and is noteworthy for the fact that it contains both intertidal and subtidal species, copulating and non- copulating species, and many species with very broad geographic ranges. These factors, as well as the consistency with which the constituent genera have been grouped together historically, make the Oligocottinae an ideal group for the study of the evolution of a reproductive mode known as internal gamete association (IGA), which is unique to sculpins. I conducted a phylogenetic study of the oligocottine sculpins based on an extensive molecular dataset consisting of DNA sequences from eight genomic regions. From the variability present in those sequences, I inferred phylogenetic relationships using parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian inference. Results of these phylogenetic analyses show that some historical taxonomy and classifications require revision to align taxonomy with evolutionary relatedness.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records and Description of Two New Species Of
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 671: 131–153New (2017) records and description of two new species of carideans shrimps... 131 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.671.9081 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research New records and description of two new species of carideans shrimps from Bahía Santa María- La Reforma lagoon, Gulf of California, Mexico (Crustacea, Caridea, Alpheidae and Processidae) José Salgado-Barragán1, Manuel Ayón-Parente2, Pilar Zamora-Tavares2 1 Laboratorio de Invertebrados Bentónicos, Unidad Académica Mazatlán, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México 2 Centro Universitario de Ciencias Agrope- cuarias, Universidad de Guadalajara, México Corresponding author: José Salgado-Barragán ([email protected]) Academic editor: S. De Grave | Received 4 May 2016 | Accepted 22 March 2017 | Published 27 April 2017 http://zoobank.org/9742DC49-F925-4B4B-B440-17354BDDB4B5 Citation: Salgado-Barragán J, Ayón-Parente M, Zamora-Tavares P (2017) New records and description of two new species of carideans shrimps from Bahía Santa María-La Reforma lagoon, Gulf of California, Mexico (Crustacea, Caridea, Alpheidae and Processidae). ZooKeys 671: 131–153. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.671.9081 Abstract Two new species of the family Alpheidae: Alpheus margaritae sp. n. and Leptalpheus melendezensis sp. n. are described from Santa María-La Reforma, coastal lagoon, SE Gulf of California. Alpheus margaritae sp. n. is closely related to A. antepaenultimus and A. mazatlanicus from the Eastern Pacific and to A. chacei from the Western Atlantic, but can be differentiated from these by a combination of characters, especially the morphology of the scaphocerite and the first pereopods.
    [Show full text]
  • Nudibranch Range Shifts Associated with the 2014 Warm Anomaly in the Northeast Pacific
    Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences Volume 115 | Issue 1 Article 2 4-26-2016 Nudibranch Range Shifts associated with the 2014 Warm Anomaly in the Northeast Pacific Jeffrey HR Goddard University of California, Santa Barbara, [email protected] Nancy Treneman University of Oregon William E. Pence Douglas E. Mason California High School Phillip M. Dobry See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.oxy.edu/scas Part of the Marine Biology Commons, Population Biology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Goddard, Jeffrey HR; Treneman, Nancy; Pence, William E.; Mason, Douglas E.; Dobry, Phillip M.; Green, Brenna; and Hoover, Craig (2016) "Nudibranch Range Shifts associated with the 2014 Warm Anomaly in the Northeast Pacific," Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences: Vol. 115: Iss. 1. Available at: https://scholar.oxy.edu/scas/vol115/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by OxyScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences by an authorized editor of OxyScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nudibranch Range Shifts associated with the 2014 Warm Anomaly in the Northeast Pacific Cover Page Footnote We thank Will and Ziggy Goddard for their expert assistance in the field, Jackie Sones and Eric Sanford of the Bodega Marine Laboratory for sharing their observations and knowledge of the intertidal fauna of Bodega Head and Sonoma County, and David Anderson of the National Park Service and Richard Emlet of the University of Oregon for sharing their respective observations of Okenia rosacea in northern California and southern Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • Template Proceedings 1.Qxd
    Reprint from Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, ser. 4, vol. 62, 15 April 2015. © 2015 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Series 4, Volume 62, No. 6, pp. 191–205, 7 figs. April 15, 2015 Three New Species of Aglajid Cephalaspidean Mollusks from the Tropical Indo-Pacific of the Verde Island Passage Terrence Gosliner Department of Invertebrate Zoology, California Academy of Sciences, 55 Music Concourse Drive, San Francisco, CA 94118, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] Three new species of aglajid opisthobranchs are described from the Verde Island Passage of the Philippines. Philinopsis buntot sp. nov. is found from two localities in Batangas, Luzon. It is immediately recognizable and distinct from all other aglajids by its medial projection that extends from the posterior end of the posterior shield. Its penis has a lobate prostate and a bilobed penial papilla with a basal collar. The collar and the lobes of the papilla bear small spines around their margins. Philinopsis aliciae sp. nov., known only a single specimen from the Philippines, is similar to P. buntot, but lacks the distinctive tail or any posterior medial appendage. It has a simple penis, which lacks any trace of penial spines. Chelidonura alexisi sp. nov. is characterized by its black body, often with minute opaque white spots. It has a sim- ple penis with two cuticularized conical papillae, one situated near the middle and the other near the apex. This species is known from four specimens and a photo of a fifth specimen, also observed in the Philippines, on the southern side of the Verde Island Passage.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States And
    t a AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY QL 614 .A43 V.2 .A 4-3 AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY Special Publication No. 2 A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes -^ ru from the United States m CD and Canada (SECOND EDITION) A/^Ssrf>* '-^\ —---^ Report of the Committee on Names of Fishes, Presented at the Ei^ty-ninth Annual Meeting, Clearwater, Florida, September 16-18, 1959 Reeve M. Bailey, Chairman Ernest A. Lachner, C. C. Lindsey, C. Richard Robins Phil M. Roedel, W. B. Scott, Loren P. Woods Ann Arbor, Michigan • 1960 Copies of this publication may be purchased for $1.00 each (paper cover) or $2.00 (cloth cover). Orders, accompanied by remittance payable to the American Fisheries Society, should be addressed to E. A. Seaman, Secretary-Treasurer, American Fisheries Society, Box 483, McLean, Virginia. Copyright 1960 American Fisheries Society Printed by Waverly Press, Inc. Baltimore, Maryland lutroduction This second list of the names of fishes of The shore fishes from Greenland, eastern the United States and Canada is not sim- Canada and the United States, and the ply a reprinting with corrections, but con- northern Gulf of Mexico to the mouth of stitutes a major revision and enlargement. the Rio Grande are included, but those The earlier list, published in 1948 as Special from Iceland, Bermuda, the Bahamas, Cuba Publication No. 1 of the American Fisheries and the other West Indian islands, and Society, has been widely used and has Mexico are excluded unless they occur also contributed substantially toward its goal of in the region covered. In the Pacific, the achieving uniformity and avoiding confusion area treated includes that part of the conti- in nomenclature.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1. Bodega Marine Lab Student Reports on Polychaete Biology
    Appendix 1. Bodega Marine Lab student reports on polychaete biology. Species names in reports were assigned to currently accepted names. Thus, Ackerman (1976) reported Eupolymnia crescentis, which was recorded as Eupolymnia heterobranchia in spreadsheets of current species (spreadsheets 2-5). Ackerman, Peter. 1976. The influence of substrate upon the importance of tentacular regeneration in the terebellid polychaete EUPOLYMNIA CRESCENTIS with reference to another terebellid polychaete NEOAMPHITRITE ROBUSTA in regard to its respiratory response. Student Report, Bodega Marine Lab, Library. IDS 100 ∗ Eupolymnia heterobranchia (Johnson, 1901) reported as Eupolymnia crescentis Chamberlin, 1919 changed per Lights 2007. Alex, Dan. 1972. A settling survey of Mason's Marina. Student Report, Bodega Marine Lab, Library. Zoology 157 Alexander, David. 1976. Effects of temperature and other factors on the distribution of LUMBRINERIS ZONATA in the substratum (Annelida: polychaeta). Student Report, Bodega Marine Lab, Library. IDS 100 Amrein, Yost. 1949. The holdfast fauna of MACROSYSTIS INTEGRIFOLIA. Student Report, Bodega Marine Lab, Library. Zoology 112 ∗ Platynereis bicanaliculata (Baird, 1863) reported as Platynereis agassizi Okuda & Yamada, 1954. Changed per Lights 1954 (2nd edition). ∗ Naineris dendritica (Kinberg, 1867) reported as Nanereis laevigata (Grube, 1855) (should be: Naineris laevigata). N. laevigata not in Hartman 1969 or Lights 2007. N. dendritica taken as synonymous with N. laevigata. ∗ Hydroides uncinatus Fauvel, 1927 correct per I.T.I.S. although Hartman 1969 reports Hydroides changing to Eupomatus. Lights 2007 has changed Eupomatus to Hydroides. ∗ Dorvillea moniloceras (Moore, 1909) reported as Stauronereis moniloceras (Moore, 1909). (Stauronereis to Dorvillea per Hartman 1968). ∗ Amrein reported Stylarioides flabellata, which was not recognized by Hartman 1969, Lights 2007 or the Integrated Taxonomic Information System (I.T.I.S.).
    [Show full text]