Outcome Evaluation of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director's Pioneer Award (NDPA), FY 2004-2005
Outcome Evaluation of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director‟s Pioneer Award (NDPA), FY 2004–2005 Final Report July 22, 2011 Prepared for the NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH G. Stephane Philogene, Ph.D. Project Officer Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives Office of the Director, NIH Prepared by Bhavya Lal—Task Leader Mary Elizabeth Hughes, Stephanie Shipp, Elizabeth C. Lee, Amy Marshall Richards, Adrienne Zhu IDA Science and Technology Policy Institute 1899 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 520 Washington DC 20006 Executive Summary Overview of Study The National Institutes of Health (NIH) launched the NIH Director‘s Pioneer Award (NDPA) in fiscal year (FY) 2004 ―to support individual scientists of exceptional creativity who propose pioneering approaches to major contemporary challenges in biomedical research‖ (NIH 2004). The NDPA program grew out of concerns that the traditional NIH peer review process had become overly conservative, and the belief that NIH required specific means to fund high-risk research.1 On the premise that great ideas are driven by individuals, and not necessarily by work plans, the program sought to find researchers who have the skills and creativity to take productive risks. The NDPA is a novel program that gave grantees extreme flexibility in how they could use the $2.5 million in direct costs provided to them through the grant.2 The NDPA represented a new way of funding biomedical and behavioral research for the NIH and, at the time it was launched, it was viewed by many as an experiment (NIH 2004; Culliton 2006).
[Show full text]