Drainage Network Development in the Pannonian Basin1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Drainage Network Development in the Pannonian Basin1 Drainage network development in the Pannonian Basin1 River and history The Danube has been involved in several significant events of world history, just to According to the archives, the word Danube mention some of them: Attila the Hun, the was already known as early as in the 7th cen- leader of the Hunnic Empire rushed along tury BC. The Greek called its lower river sec- the Danube (406–453 AD) as far as the tion situated between the Iron Gates and the Catalaunian Plains to fight with the Western Black Sea Ister. After occupying Illyria in 168 world. Charlemagne and his troops also BC, the Romans called the river Danubius and marched along the river to put down the they established that Ister and Danubius were reign of the Avars. The Danube is the second the same river. Julius Caesar used the name longest river in Europe (after the Volga). The Danube for the first time. The river was wor- total length of the river is 2,860 km, including shipped as a deity during the Roman Empire the Hungarian section as long as 417 km. The (Kádár, L. 1980). The word Danube is of Celtic 140-km-long river section between Oroszvár origin and it means “water”, “river”. It was and the Ipoly estuary (Szob) marks the bor- transmitted into the Hungarian language by der between Hungary and Slovakia. The the northern Slavic nations. Its foreign versions Danube reaches Hungary as a large river. (Danube, Donau, Danubio, Dunaj, Dunarea, Dunav, etc.) are of ancient origin as well. The headspring of the river Danube has The Hungarian section of the Danube not been known for so long as it would be expected. Herodotus (484–408 BC) believed As a result of river regulations, the that the source of the Danube was in the Hungarian section of the Danube is not en- Pyrenees. During the Second Punic War tirely navigable. The river regulations carried (218–201 BC) the Romans realized while they out at the end of the 19th century and at the were crossing the lower section of Rhone beginning of the 20th century converted the that Herodotus had been wrong. Later, natural river into an artificial channel. they suspected that the Danube originated The Danube enters the Little Hungarian in the mountains of Bretagne away from Plain at the meeting point of the Alps and the the Pyrenees. However, that presumption White Carpathians at 130 m a.s.l. After flow- was proved to be mistaken, too. The false ing through the so called “Porta Hungarica” assumption was clarified during the Gallic at Devin (today a district of Bratislava), the Wars (58–51 BC) waged by the Roman pro- Danube reaches the Little Hungarian Plain consul Julius Caesar who, however, did not transporting an immense amount of alluvial manage to find the spring of the Danube sediments (pebbles, sand, silt). The sediment and assumed that the river originated in the transport mainly results from floods, the fre- Southern Alps. In the end, the source of the quency of which has decreased significantly river, namely the Black Forest was discov- since the construction of the Austrian and ered only in 14–16 AD. Slovakian dams (Gabčíkovo Dams). 1 Firstly published: Schweitzer, F. 2015. Drainage network development in the Pannonian Basin. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 64. 2. 101–119. 171 The largest European island can be found There are river sections where river down- in the Little Hungarian Plain. It is called cutting is as frequent as valley filling. In that “Golden Garden”, involving the Szigetköz case erosion and deposition alternate each as the Hungarian part and the Zitny Ostrov other. That’s why the valley is neither down (in Hungarian ‘Csallóköz’), as the Slovakian cut nor filled with alluvium to a great extent. part of the alluvial fan. The vicinity of the For example, between Bratislava (Slovakia) two regions is an endless plain, the surface of and Gönyű (Hungary) filling is the most which is built up of point bars. The Danube typical river function, therefore, most of the flows on the top of the alluvial fan where Danube sediment reaching the country are the main channel had changed its direction deposited there. The (relatively fast) fluvial quite frequently before the river regulation deposition resulted in the development of works. River bar evolution made the Danube anabranches. Between Gönyű and Komárom meander and change its flow resulting in the not only deposition but also transportation development of several alluvial fans. Thus, can be detected since the bedload is partly the Danube had no main channel even at the transported away. beginning of the 19th century. The huge alluvial fan consists of two types: The archeological findings confirm that the a younger, low-lying alluvial plain, involving navigable main channel of the Roman era is Szigetköz, the Moson Plain and the Hanság equivalent to the contemporary Moson Danube. Plain with the alluvial plain of River Rába. The region also serves as one of the most sig- The older and higher situated deltaic and nificant drinking water supply of the northern alluvial plain involves, among others, the part of the Transdanubia and the southern part Parndorf Plain and the Bana Hill (Figure 1). of Slovakia. The gold of the “Golden Garden” is At the northern edge of the Gerecse Hills, the drinking water itself. The main responsibil- the flood plain of the Danube becomes nar- ity of the authorities and the scientific world rower, at Esztergom it widens again, then in is to preserve that treasure. It is a fundamen- the Visegrád Gorge it is only narrow strips tal interest to restore the water balance prior following the river banks. Between Vác and to the construction of the Gabčíkovo Dams to Budapest the floodplain of the river is well- maintain and protect the strategic drinking wa- defined with clear boundaries, characterized ter supplies. The water regime and the water by embayments of various size. It follows the balance of the Danube are controlled mainly river, especially the left riverbank as far as by the precipitation received by the catchment the southern boundary of the country with areas of the Austrian Alps and Prealps as well a varying width (15–25 km). In many places, as the melt water of snow and glaciers. both on the right and left riverbanks, ex- tensive depressions occupy the floodplain (Bulla, B. 1941; Erdélyi, M. 1955; Pécsi, M. Fluvial land-forming processes of the 1959; Scheuer, Gy. and Schweitzer, F. 1984). Danube Some examples: the Kalocsa and the Baja Depressions on the left riverbank; the Érd, The immediate vicinity of the river is formed the Adony, the Paks-Tengelic-Sárköz and the by river-bed changes. The Hungarian sec- Mohács Depressions on the right riverbank tion of the river can be characterized by dissected by landslide-effected high bluffs of river down-cutting and valley filling. Upper 40–50 m height. Lots of islands are attached to courses are rare along the Hungarian section the feet of the bluffs which are the remnants of the river. Even the Visegrád Gorge cannot of larger landslides eroded by the Danube. be considered as a pure incising valley type The current Danube is flowing from North as point bars can be observed in several plac- to South. According to the geomorphologic es. Valley filling is not very frequent either, investigations and radiometric data, dur- rather a transient type of cutting and filling. ing the last interglacial period which was 172 Fig. 1. The area between the Parndorf Plain and the Bana Hill (by Pécsi, M. 1959) warm and humid, the direction of flow of be measured in decades and centuries but in the Danube was NW–SE, therefore the riv- geologic time. So it is not a coincidence that er was flowing through the Danube–Tisza the history of Central Europe’s largest river Interfluve. The direction of flow followed has been investigated for almost 150 years the series of depressions getting younger (Sóbányi, Gy. 1893; Halaváts, Gy. 1898; and younger southwards. However, the Cvijić, J. 1908, 1910; Lóczy, L. 1913; Strömpl, Danube changed its direction over time and G. 1913; Cholnoky, J. 1929; Noszky, J. 1933; started to erode the high bluffs of the right Prinz, Gy. 1936; Szádeczky-Kardoss, E. 1939; Danube riverbank descending in the direc- Bulla, B. 1941; Mottl, M. 1941; Mihálcz, I. tion of the Danube–Tisza Interfluve. The 1953; Sümeghy, J. 1953; Fink, J. and Majdan, area of high bluffs was as wide as 10–15 km H. 1954; Kádár, L. 1955; Kéz, A. 1956; Pécsi, and it stretched as far as the western edge of M. 1959; Scheuer, Gy. and Schweitzer, F. the current Danube–Tisza Interfluve 80,000– 1988; Gábris, Gy. 2006). 100,000 years ago. The Solt Hill and the Tétel During that period several theories have Hill are buttes representing the remnants of come into being. The aim has been to locate the former bluff of Mezőföld (Figure 2). the gravel deposits situated above 300–330 m The sand dunes of Illancs being an alluvial a.s.l. and below 100–110 m a.s.l. in time ac- fan (172 m a.s.l) also originate from Mezőföld. cording to the relevant scientific disciplines. The alluvial fan had evolved before the Most of the syntheses (Penck, A. 1894) are Danube changed its direction of flow. in connection with theories on climatically induced fluvial terraces classified by Alpine glacial chronology. Geomorphologists asso- The evolution of the Danube in brief ciate the evolution of the fluvial terraces of the Danube with the fluvial system changes The evolution of the “ancient” Danube as related to the last four major Alpine glacia- well as that of the current river have taken tions.
Recommended publications
  • Neogene and Quaternary Stratigraphy Actual Terminology and Nomenclature
    ONE DAY WORKSHOP NEOGENE AND QUATERNARY STRATIGRAPHY ACTUAL TERMINOLOGY AND NOMENCLATURE Belgrade, September 20, 2013 Programme & Abstracts Segment of the ICS-IUGS International Chronostratigraphic Chart v2013/1 for the last 33.9 Ma (source: http://www.stratigraphy.org/ICSchart/ChronostratChart2013- 01.pdf) ISBN 978-86-86053-13-8 SERBIAN GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY Commission on Neogene Commission on Quaternary Stratigraphy, Paleontology and Tectonics Division NEOGENE AND QUATERNARY STRATIGRAPHY ACTUAL TERMINOLOGY AND NOMENCLATURE Programme & Abstracts Volume Edited by: Ljupko Rundić Tivadar Gaudenyi Mladjen Jovanović ONE DAY WORKSHOP Belgrade, September 20, 2013 NEOGENE AND QUATERNARY STRATIGRAPHY ACTUAL TERMINOLOGY AND NOMENCLATURE Programme & Abstracts Volume Edited by: Ljupko Rundić Tivadar Gaudenyi Mladjen Jovanović For the Publisher: Zoran Stevanović (President of the Serbian Geological Society) Publisher: Serbian Geological Society, Kamenička 6, 11000 Belgrade Printed by: NS Digiprint, Laze Lazarevića 9, 21000 Novi Sad Circulation: 100 CIP - Katalogizacija u publikaciji Biblioteka Matice srpske, Novi Sad 551.7:001.4(048.3) One Day Workshop "Neogene and Quaternary Stratigraphy - Actual Terminology and Nomenclature" (2013 ; Beograd) Programme & Abstracts / One Day Workshop "Neogene and Quaternary Stratigraphy - Actual Terminology and Nomenclature", Belgrade, September 20, 2013 ; [edited by Ljupko Rundić, Tivadar Gaudenyi, Mlađen Jovanović]. - Belgrade : Serbian Geological Society, 2013 (Novi Sad : NS Digiprint). - 53 str.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Resource Analysis of Shale Gas and Shale Oil in Europe
    Draft Report for DG JRC in the Context of Contract JRC/PTT/2015/F.3/0027/NC "Development of shale gas and shale oil in Europe" European Unconventional Oil and Gas Assessment (EUOGA) Geological resource analysis of shale gas and shale oil in Europe Deliverable T4b mmmll Geological resource analysis of shale gas/oil in Europe June 2016 I 2 Geological resource analysis of shale gas/oil in Europe Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................. 3 Abstract ........................................................................................................... 6 Executive Summary ........................................................................................... 7 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 8 Item 4.1 Setup and distribute a template for uniformly describing EU shale plays to the National Geological Surveys .........................................................................12 Item 4.2 Elaborate and compile general and systematic descriptions of the shale plays from the NGS responses ....................................................................................15 T01, B02 - Norwegian-Danish-S. Sweden – Alum Shale .........................................16 T02 - Baltic Basin – Cambrian-Silurian Shales ......................................................22 T03 - South Lublin Basin, Narol Basin and Lviv-Volyn Basin – Lower Paleozoic Shales ......................................................................................................................37
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphometrical Method for Delineation of Plains - Case Study of the South-Eastern (Serbian) Segment of the Pannonian Plain
    Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, May 2012, Vol. 7, No. 2, p. 239 - 248 GEOMORPHOMETRICAL METHOD FOR DELINEATION OF PLAINS - CASE STUDY OF THE SOUTH-EASTERN (SERBIAN) SEGMENT OF THE PANNONIAN PLAIN Jelena ĆALIĆ, Tivadar GAUDENYI, Marko V. MILOŠEVIĆ, Dragoljub ŠTRBAC & Milovan MILIVOJEVIĆ Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić” of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Đure Jakšića 9, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Usage of the terms Pannonian Basin and Pannonian Plain in physical and regional geography is often characterised by vague spatial extent, especially in Serbian geographical literature. The aims of this paper are directed towards establishing a method which would define a plain in geomorphological and geomorphometrical sense. Although the case study is focused on definition of the actual boundary of the Pannonian Plain in Serbia, the method of delineation can be used on other locations as well, especially in the wider area of the Pannonian (Carpathian) Basin. The method relies on the numerical analysis of a digital terrain model, which produced the value of the surface roughness coefficient. By combining the geomorphometrical analysis with spatial extent of characteristic lithologies (Quaternary) and morphological processes (dominant fluvial aggradation and eolian process), the exact delineation of the Pannonian Plain in Serbia was carried out. As opposed to some earlier opinions, the Pannonian Plain extends further to the south from the Sava and the Danube Rivers, encompassing also the lower parts of the Drina, Kolubara, Velika Morava and Mlava basins. Within Serbia, the Pannonian Plain occupies 24,450 km2, which is 27.6% of the territory of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Magyar Állami Földtani Intézet Évkönyve 70. Kötet 1. Füz. (1987.)
    DELIMITATION AND CORRELATION OF THE PONTIAN AND THE MESSINIAN STAGES ON THE BASIS OF MALACOFAUNA by P. M. Stevanovic Introduction. in the present review of some of the latest attempts to correlate the Messinian in the Mediterranean province and the Pontian of the Paratethys, reference is made foremostly to the published papers from the 7th RCMNS Congress in Athens and the rich literature on the Pontian used in preparing the book “The Pontian” to be edited and published in Yugoslavia in the book series “Chronostratigraphie und Neostratotypen in der zentralen Paratethys”. My speculations are based on the results of general malacofauna considerations and my field investigations in various regions of the Paratethys in Greece and Italy. In a paper recently published under the title “Die Äquivalente des Tortoniano und Messiniano in der zentralen Paratethys”, it is claimed that after the Badenian, stages from the Mediterranean can be correlated with those from the Paratethys only “mit Hilfe radiometrischen Daten” or only of mammals (Papp and Steininger, 1979), thus excluding other possible correlations. While certain authors, like J. Senes, maintain the “equivalence de Page du Messinien et du Pontién supérieur” (Senes, 1981, p. 54), another group of palaeo- malacologists have a different approach to the Messinian/Pontian correlation, cor­ recting their concept with the time (G illet, 1958, 1963, 1969; Selli, 1960, 1973; P app, Steininger and G eorgiades-D ikeoulia, 1978; Balesio, A rchambault- G uézou, 1980; Stevanovic, 1963, 1966; A rchambault-G uézou, Ilina et al., 1979; Papp, 1980; Ilina, 1980; R ögl and Steininger, 1983; and others). Approaches of other specialist to the Messinian/Pontian relationship such as of mammalogists, ostracodologists, micropalaeontologists, palynologists,geochemists, geophysicists, etc are not considered in the present paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeogene and Neogene
    Palaeogene and Neogene MICHAEL W RASSER, MATHIAS HARZHAUSER (co-ordinators), OLGA Y. ANISTRATENKO, VITALIY V. ANISTRATENKO, DAVIDE BASSI, MIRKO BELAK, JEAN-PIERRE BERGER, GIANLUCA BIANCHINI, SAFET CICIC, VLASTA COSOVIC, NELA DOLA.KOVA., KATICA DROBNE, SORIN FILIPESCU, KARL GÜRS, SA.RKA HLADILOVA., HAZIM HRVATOVIC, BOGOMIR JELEN, _ JACEK ROBERT KASINSKI, MICHAL KOVA.C, POLONA KRALJ, TIHOMIR MARJANAC, EMÖ MA.RTON, PAOLO MIETTO, ALAN MORO, ANDRA.S NAGYMAROSY, JAMES H. NEBELSICK, SLAVOMIR NEHYBA, BOJAN OGORELEC, NESTOR OSZCZYPKO, DAVOR PAVELIC,, RAJKO PAVLOVEC, JERNEJ PAVSIC, PAVLA PETROVA, MARCIN PIWOCKI, MARIJAN POLJAK, NEVIO PUGLIESE, REJHANA REDZEPOVIC, HELENA RIFELJ, REINHARD ROETZEL, DRAGOMIR SKABERNE, VUBOMIR SLIVA, GERDA STANDKE, GIORGIO TUNIS, DIONYZ VASS, MICHAEL WAGREICH & FRANK WESSELINGH Over the last 65 Ma, our world assumed its modem shape. This Miocene to Plioeene sueeessor Lake Pannon. At its maximum timespan is divided into the Palaeogene Period, lasting from 65 extent, the Paratethys extended from the Rhöne Basin in Franee to 23 Ma and the Neogene, which extends up to the present day towards Inner Asia. Subsequently, it was partitioned into a (see Gradstein & Ogg (2004) and Gregory et al. (2005) for smaller western part eonsisting of the Western and the Central diseussion about the Quaternary). Paratethys and the larger Eastern Paratethys. The Western Throughout the Cenozoie Era, Afriea was moving towards Paratethys eomprises the Rhöne Basin and the Alpine Foreland Eurasia in a northward direetion and with a eountercloekwise Basin of Switzerland, Bavaria and Austria. The Central Para- rotation. Numerous mieroplates in the Mediterranean area were tethys extends from the Vienna Basin in the west to the eompressed, gradually fusing, and Eurasiaunderwent a shift from Carpathian Foreland in the east where it abuts the area of the a marine arehipelago to eontinental environments, related to the Eastem Paratethys.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiniferites Cruciformis, Pterocysta Cruciformis and Galeacysta Etrusca: Morphology and Palaeoecology
    Palynology ISSN: 0191-6122 (Print) 1558-9188 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tpal20 Spiniferites cruciformis, Pterocysta cruciformis and Galeacysta etrusca: morphology and palaeoecology Peta Mudie, André Rochon, Keith Richards, Shannon Ferguson & Sophie Warny To cite this article: Peta Mudie, André Rochon, Keith Richards, Shannon Ferguson & Sophie Warny (2018) Spiniferitescruciformis, Pterocystacruciformis and Galeacystaetrusca: morphology and palaeoecology, Palynology, 42:sup1, 135-161, DOI: 10.1080/01916122.2018.1465737 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/01916122.2018.1465737 © 2018 The Author(s). Published by AASP – The Palynological Society Published online: 14 Dec 2018. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 28 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tpal20 PALYNOLOGY 2018, VOL. 42, NO. S1, 135–161 https://doi.org/10.1080/01916122.2018.1465737 Spiniferites cruciformis, Pterocysta cruciformis and Galeacysta etrusca: morphology and palaeoecology Peta Mudiea, Andre Rochonb, Keith Richardsc,d, Shannon Fergusone and Sophie Warnye aGeological Survey Canada-Atlantic, Dartmouth, Canada; bISMER, UniversiteduQuebec a Rimouski, Rimouski, Canada; cKrA Stratigraphic Ltd., Conwy, UK; dInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; eDepartment of Geology and Geophysics, and Museum of Natural Science, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA ABSTRACT KEYWORDS Miocene to modern sediments of the Ponto-Caspian basins and Mediterranean Sea are uniquely distin- Cruciform cyst; guished by presence of gonyaulacacean cysts with ellipsoid to cruciform endocysts and highly variable chronostratigraphy; ectocystal features, including pterate (wing-like) and galeate (helmet-like) outer wall layers.
    [Show full text]
  • D5.2 Transboundary Utilisation Model
    GeoCom – FP7 CONCERTO – 239515 TRANSBOUNDARY UTILISATION MODEL D5.2 – Final version WP Leader: P9 – University of Szeged. Key Contributors: P1, P14 2012 GeoCom The water base model of the Szeged – Morahalom – Subotica triangle WP5.2. Transboundary issues of the utilization of geothermal energy University of Szeged 2012. WP5.2 Transboundary issues of the utilization of geothermal energy The most significant thermal water resource in the Carpathian Basin can be found under the territory of the Hungarian-Serbian border, in the Szeged-Morahalom-Subotica triangle. The abstraction for extensive and complex utilization is currently being started on both sides of the border. For the safe and sustainable abstraction, and its international monitoring, it is necessary to determine the hydrogeological-hydrodynamic features of the common thermal water base, and to elaborate a two-phase 4D model of the water base for the mapping of the water resource and its gas content. 2 Tartalom Geological environment ............................................................................................................. 4 Geological evolution, geothermal features, thermal water supply ................................... 4 Presentation of the porous Neogene formations in the SE part of the Great Plain, with special regard to the thermal water-bearing Pannonian layers. ...................................... 6 Hydrogeological, hydrodynamic features of the Southeast Great Plain .......................... 8 The geology of Vojvodina ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]