Media Fragments
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2011 03 21-Final Bskyb CPBF Response 21 March
RESPONSE BY THE CAMPAIGN FOR PRESS AND BROADCASTING FREEDOM (CPBF) TO THE DCMS CONSULTATION ON THE PROPOSED NEWS CORPORATION TAKEOVER OF BSKYB. 1.1 THE CAMPAIGN FOR PRESS AND BROADCASTING FREEDOM The Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom (CPBF) is an independent organisation funded by its membership which links people working inside and outside the media. It works to improve diversity and accountability in the media and has campaigned since 1979 on a range of issues including ownership and control, censorship, public service broadcasting and media standards. For further details: www.cpbf.org.uk 1.2 The CPBF responded to the original Ofcom enquiry which reported on 31 December 2010. We argued in our evidence to Ofcom that the News Corporation/ BSkyB takeover would ‘represent a transformative shift in UK media ownership’. We had serious concerns about the impact of the proposed takeover on media plurality, but also more broadly on the competitive position of other UK media groups faced with the massive global resources (financial, marketing, programming) a merged News Corporation/BSkyB would be able to deploy. We also stressed the basic point, which goes right to the heart of media pluralism, that a merged company would be a powerful boost to the well-documented existing political and commercial power and influence which Rupert Murdoch, the chairman and CEO of News Corporation, already exerts within the UK. 1.3 We think this power and influence has been confirmed yet again. In particular we are puzzled and concerned by the decision taken by the Culture Secretary to substitute Ofcom’s original advice, which he was initially minded to accept, that the merger would give rise to serious media plurality concerns and therefore be referred to the Competition Commission, with a process that involved direct negotiations with News Corporation. -
Studies of Alternative Journalism, 2003-2016 by Tony Harcup
Extending our gaze beyond the mainstream: studies of alternative journalism, 2003-2016 By Tony Harcup A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Publication Department of Journalism Studies Faculty of Social Sciences University of Sheffield Submitted: October 2016 [Tony Harcup PhD by Publication: Extending our gaze beyond the mainstream] Extending our gaze beyond the mainstream: studies of alternative journalism, 2003-2016 SUMMARY The thesis comprises a series of nine studies that were all published in peer- reviewed journals or books between 2003 and 2016, accompanied and contextualised by a commentary setting out the coherence and significance of the research when viewed as a whole. This work is concerned with exploration of alternative media in general, and alternative journalism in particular. The submitted publications comprise separate studies that are linked thematically and point to the following conclusions: alternative journalism is not necessarily a failed project just because audiences tend to be small and the lifetime of any particular project tends to be short; there can be said to be a continuum of journalistic practice involving both mainstream and alternative media; and the reporting practices and ethical commitment found within alternative journalism can be seen as an expression of active citizenship. Taken together, the studies gathered in the submission make an original contribution to scholarship in the fields of alternative media and alternative journalism; in the process, they have much to say about journalism as a whole. As an original contribution to scholarship over a sustained period of enquiry, the thesis represents a substantial addition to our knowledge. -
Old Greshamian Magazine CONTENTS
Old Greshamian Magazine CONTENTS Calendar of Events ......................................................................................................3 Chairmans Notes ........................................................................................................4 Minutes of A.G.M....................................................................................................5-7 Accounts..................................................................................................................9-10 Staff Lists...............................................................................................................12-14 Obituaries..............................................................................................................16-41 News.......................................................................................................................43-55 The Edinburgh House Dinner .................................................................................56 Class of 1989 Reunion...............................................................................................56 The Old School House Dinner.................................................................................57 Reunion Dinner in Newquay ...................................................................................59 Philip Newell Awards...........................................................................................60-64 Marriages and Engagements ....................................................................................65 -
Ed Miliband Et Al Submission
Overview of submission of Ed Miliband, Sir Vince Cable, Kenneth Clarke and Lord Falconer to CMA on plurality and broadcasting standards issues raised by proposed acquisition by 21st Century Fox of Sky plc The attached document sets out our detailed case on why we believe the purchase of the remaining 61% of Sky by 21CF would operate against the public interest on grounds of plurality and broadcasting standards. References to page numbers in the text refer to this document unless otherwise stated. Plurality: Summary of Case 1. The issues for the CMA raised by the reference in respect of plurality are whether the bid threatens the diversity of viewpoints that are available and consumed and whether it would give one media owner too much influence over public opinion and the political agenda. 2. Our case is that Sky would come under the control of the Murdoch Family Trust as a result of the takeover and the takeover would undermine plurality on both of the tests required to be considered by the CMA. 3. It is uncontested that the Murdoch Family Trust (MFT) would enjoy exactly the same ownership rights of Sky post-takeover as it currently enjoys in relation to its UK newspaper titles. 21CF would own 100% of Sky, with the MFT owning 39% of 21CF, just as currently News Corp owns 100% of News UK (and therefore the print titles of that company), with the MFT owning 39% of News Corp. 4. It is clear from the record of the Murdochs, the words of Rupert Murdoch, and Murdoch employees that Mr Murdoch and his family exert total control over their UK newspapers through the MFT’s 39% stake in NewsCorp.