DOCSLIB.ORG

Undocuqueer: Interacting and Working Within the Intersection of LGBTQ and Undocumented

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Undocuqueer: Interacting and Working Within the Intersection of LGBTQ and Undocumented Undocuqueer: Interacting and Working within the Intersection of LGBTQ and Undocumented by Jesus Cisneros A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved April 2015 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Molly Ott, Co-Chair Gustavo Fischman, Co-Chair Kate Anderson ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY August 2015 UMI Number: 3716278 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI 3716278 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346 ABSTRACT Employing Queer Intersectionality, this study explored how undocuqueer activists made sense of, interacted and worked within the intersection of their LGBTQ and undocumented experience. Participants ascribed three overarching self-meanings: Vulnerability, Complexity, and Resilience. These self-meanings describe the ways participants perceived the interplay of their gender, sexuality and immigration status within the current sociopolitical context of the U.S. Recognizing their vulnerability within a state of illegibility, participants described a sense of exclusion within spaces of belonging, and wariness managing relationships with others; opting for more complex self-definitions, they resisted simplistic conceptions of identity that rendered their social locations invisible (e.g., homonormativity, heteronormativity, DREAMer); and describing themselves as resilient, they described surviving societal as well as familial rejection even when surviving seemed impossible to do so. Interacting and working within the intersection of gender, sexuality and immigration status, participants described identity negotiation and coming out as a form of resistance to institutionalized oppression, and resilience amidst simultaneous anti-immigrant, xenophobic and heterosexist power structures. Participants learned to live in multiple worlds at the same time, and embrace the multiplicity of their undocuqueer identity while seeking to bridge their communities through stories, activism and peer education. This study has implications for further understanding the way that queer politics and identity interact/ relate with various axes of inequality. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. v CHAPTER INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 Purpose Of Study ................................................................................................ 4 Significance Of Study ......................................................................................... 6 Research Questions ............................................................................................. 7 Definitions ........................................................................................................... 8 Sex, Gender And Sexuality ..................................................................... 8 Immigration Status .................................................................................. 10 Activism .................................................................................................. 10 Organization Of Study ........................................................................................ 11 REVIEW OF LITERATURE ......................................................................................... 12 Politics Of LGBTQ Rights In The U.S. .............................................................. 12 LGBTQ Activists .................................................................................... 15 Politics Of Immigrant Rights In The U.S. .......................................................... 17 Undocumented Activists ......................................................................... 20 Intersecting Politics Of LGBTQ Immigration In The U.S. ................................ 23 LGBTQ Undocumented Immigrants ...................................................... 26 Summary ............................................................................................................. 29 Conceptual Framework ....................................................................................... 30 Queer Theory .......................................................................................... 30 ii CHAPTER Page Intersectionality ....................................................................................... 34 Queer Intersectionality ............................................................................ 36 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................... 40 Narrative Inquiry ................................................................................................. 42 Study Context ...................................................................................................... 45 Participant Selection ........................................................................................... 46 Data Collection ................................................................................................... 48 Semi-Structured Interviews .................................................................... 48 Protocol ................................................................................................... 49 Researcher ........................................................................................................... 51 Ethical Considerations ........................................................................................ 53 Analytic Procedure .............................................................................................. 54 Trustworthiness ....................................................................................... 58 FINDINGS ..................................................................................................................... 59 Section 1: Meaning Making ................................................................................ 60 Vulnerability: Recognizing Illegibility Inscribed By Law ..................... 61 Exclusion Within Spaces Of Belonging ..................................... 69 Managing Interpersonal Experiences .......................................... 74 Complexity: Developing Complex Self-Definitions .............................. 85 Resisting Simplistic Conceptions Of Identity ............................. 89 Heteronormativity ........................................................... 94 Homonormativity .......................................................... 98 iii CHAPTER Page DREAMer ..................................................................... 102 Resilience: When Thriving Is (Im)Possible ............................................ 106 Surviving Social Rejection ......................................................... 110 Surviving Familial Rejection ...................................................... 114 Section 2: Interacting And Working Within ....................................................... 120 Identity Negotiation ................................................................................ 120 Coming Out ............................................................................................. 132 Bridging Communities Through Education ............................................ 141 DISCUSSION, CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS .............................................. 147 Discussion ........................................................................................................... 149 Implications ......................................................................................................... 156 Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 162 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 165 APPENDICES ................................................................................................................ 185 A INSTRUMENT ............................................................................................... 185 B CONSENT FORM .......................................................................................... 188 iv LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Participants .......................................................................................................... 48 2. Codebook ............................................................................................................ 57 3. Frequencies ......................................................................................................... 57 v CHAPTER 1: Introduction You can be ignorant or blinded like how I was, saying that one thing does not affect the other, but if you sit down and really analyze it, like how it affects your every single day—and it affects it so much! As an LGBT mainstream movement you are
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Diversity Committee Newsletter
    Diversity Committee Newsletter Vol. 1, No. 1 — May 2015 Diversity Matters: A Historical to Present-Day Look at the NJSBA’s Commitment to Diversity and Inclusion by Milagros Camacho, Diversity Committee Co-chair n recognition of the fact that New Jersey is one of tenure she instructed the General Counsel Executive the most diverse states in the country, the New Committee (GCEC) to study what steps the bar associa- I Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) has accepted tion could take to achieve greater diversity. The GCEC, the proposition that only by embracing diversity and after a full and comprehensive review of all relevant working diligently toward creating an environment of issues, published nearly 30 well-considered recom- universal inclusion can our association become the type mendations in a report entitled “Blueprint for Diversity.” of fellowship that truly reflects the needs of the greater The association took this report to heart, and many of community we represent and the ideals upon which the those recommendations became part of the fabric of our NJSBA was created. This truism, one repeatedly and association. collegially impressed upon us by visionaries such as One such recommendation was the creation of a Mel Narol and countless others, formed the basis upon committee that prepared a final report on the recom- which a nascent cause became a movement, and while mendations to implement the goal of increasing diver- gathering strength in the process eventually evolved into sity in the bar. This led to the creation of an Ad Hoc a standing committee charged with the responsibility Committee on Diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Opinion and Discourse on the Intersection of LGBT Issues and Race the Opportunity Agenda
    Opinion Research & Media Content Analysis Public Opinion and Discourse on the Intersection of LGBT Issues and Race The Opportunity Agenda Acknowledgments This research was conducted by Loren Siegel (Executive Summary, What Americans Think about LGBT People, Rights and Issues: A Meta-Analysis of Recent Public Opinion, and Coverage of LGBT Issues in African American Print and Online News Media: An Analysis of Media Content); Elena Shore, Editor/Latino Media Monitor of New America Media (Coverage of LGBT Issues in Latino Print and Online News Media: An Analysis of Media Content); and Cheryl Contee, Austen Levihn- Coon, Kelly Rand, Adriana Dakin, and Catherine Saddlemire of Fission Strategy (Online Discourse about LGBT Issues in African American and Latino Communities: An Analysis of Web 2.0 Content). Loren Siegel acted as Editor-at-Large of the report, with assistance from staff of The Opportunity Agenda. Christopher Moore designed the report. The Opportunity Agenda’s research on the intersection of LGBT rights and racial justice is funded by the Arcus Foundation. The statements made and views expressed are those of The Opportunity Agenda. Special thanks to those who contributed to this project, including Sharda Sekaran, Shareeza Bhola, Rashad Robinson, Kenyon Farrow, Juan Battle, Sharon Lettman, Donna Payne, and Urvashi Vaid. About The Opportunity Agenda The Opportunity Agenda was founded in 2004 with the mission of building the national will to expand opportunity in America. Focused on moving hearts, minds, and policy over time, the organization works with social justice groups, leaders, and movements to advance solutions that expand opportunity for everyone. Through active partnerships, The Opportunity Agenda synthesizes and translates research on barriers to opportunity and corresponding solutions; uses communications and media to understand and influence public opinion; and identifies and advocates for policies that improve people’s lives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cognitive Dissonance of Religious Liberty Discourse: Statutory Rights Masquerading As Constitutional Mandates
    THE COGNITIVE DISSONANCE OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY DISCOURSE: STATUTORY RIGHTS MASQUERADING AS CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATES MARCI A. HAMILTON* There is a cognitive dissonance in current religious liberty discourse. On the one hand, there are vulnerable groups emerging as strong rights holders in the culture, including LGBTQ, women, and children. On the other hand, there are the religious believers who cannot or will not fit this new social order into their worldview and, therefore, assert rights against it. In fact, the religious liberty “rights” asserted are not consti- tutional, but rather statutory.1 It is critically important that our public debate be built on this fact. Rights for the vulnerable are under attack by some religious actors who have sought to turn religious liberty into a weapon of exclusion, control, and harm. “Cognitive dissonance” is the “psychological conflict resulting from incongruous beliefs and attitudes held simultaneously,”2 and is often experienced as discomfort, which can lead the person to choose various routes away from the discomfort, such as denial or action.3 As politi- cally powerful religious actors experience unease in a culture they no longer control, there has been a multiplication of de- * Fox Professor of Practice, University of Pennsylvania. Thanks to the Federalist Society for bringing together experts with differing views on the most important topics of the day, and to John DiIulio, Leslie Griffin, Lia Howard, and Kathleen Kennedy Townsend for their thoughtful comments. 1. See, e.g., Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA), Pub. L. No. 103- 141, 107 Stat. 1488 (1993) (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBTQ History Timeline
    Timeline – University of Miami’s LGBTQ History Milestones 1975 · April: Gay Alliance was formed in early April 1975. Ana Roca and Buzz Stearns were the prime movers of the organization. · October: Gay Alliance organized the first social event attended by 125 guests. They were recognized as an official UM organization. Edward Graziani was listed as president. Professor Marian Grabowski, Rev. Tom Crowder (UM chaplain), and Open Door were listed as supporters. UM program “Open Door” was a gathering place for students staffed by student volunteers selected and trained by the Counselling Center psychologists. 1977 · February: Professor Marian Grabowski, who had a column titled “Across Mrs. G’s Desk” in TMH, wrote an essay titled “Gays Deserve Same Rights, Justice, and Liberty.” · June: Anita Bryant’s anti-gay rights movement emerged and remained a hot topic among students for the next few years. Her name appeared in Ibis from 1978 to 1980. 1978 · April: On-campus celebration of the National Gay Blue Jeans Day raised an exchange of opinions by gay and straight students. · The last time TMH listed a program by Gay Alliance was October 10, 1978. 1980 · February: Ad in THM shows that UM provided counseling on homosexuality for students. 1982 · April: TMH’s supportive coverage of gay lifestyle was criticized by one student and two students responded supporting the newspaper. 1985 · October: Sal O’Neal, UM Senior, wrote the article “Gay Student Seeks to Inform” about the gay community at UM and in Miami. He also wrote that Gay Alliance flamed out in 1977 after the graduation of the leader Dan Abraham.
    [Show full text]
  • REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS in the AGE of HUMAN RIGHTS Pro牛
    ALISA VON HAGEL & DANIELA MANSBACH REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS IN THE AGE OF HUMAN RIGHTS - Reproductive Rights in the Age of Human Rights Alisa Von Hagel • Daniela Mansbach Reproductive Rights in the Age of Human Rights Pro-life Politics from Roe to Hobby Lobby Alisa Von Hagel Daniela Mansbach University of Wisconsin University of Wisconsin Superior, WI , USA Superior, WI , USA ISBN 978-1-137-53951-9 ISBN 978-1-137-53952-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-53952-6 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016937740 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Teaching LGBTQ History and Heritage Leila J. Rupp LGBTQ
    1 Teaching LGBTQ History and Heritage Leila J. Rupp LGBTQ Heritage Initiative: Theme Study Chapter Imagine a world in which students could visit not just Civil War battlefields that raise the profound issues of slavery and what it means for states to be united, but also buildings that housed places that came to feel like home to people marginalized because of sexuality and gender, places that were important enough to defend against onslaughts by the police. That is the possibility that teaching the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) past through historic sites offers. The houses where famous and less known lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people lived, the commercial establishments they patronized and defended, and even places that mark a history of discrimination and violence offer the opportunity to make LGBTQ history a part of US history in a way that makes a difference for students, wherever they are learning history. A more inclusive history certainly matters to LGBTQ students, who suffer not just from bullying and other forms of discrimination but also from being deprived of a past. Many years ago, I was teaching an introductory US history course when I ran into a student from the class who was working in the local gay restaurant. He told me that he had never heard of Stonewall until I talked about it in a lecture on social movement of the 1960s. He was so excited to hear a mention of the gay past in a history class that he told his roommate about it. He also came out, since they had never discussed their sexual identities, and then the roommate came out to him.
    [Show full text]
  • IPGLBT's Pride Guide
    Pride Guide IPGLBT 2019 Letter from the Editor Last year, IPGLBT tried something different. We This year, we are also using the Pride flag that created the first edition of the Pride Guide with includes the black and brown stripe, introduced helpful information, programming examples, in June 2017 by the City of Philadelphia (with and featured resources and insights to help the help of IPG’s own Tierney). While not an offices and employees learn more about the “official” Pride flag, we feel the inclusion of the LGBTQ+ community. The feedback received black and brown stripe calls attention to the from employees and executives was extremely marginalization and, sometimes, intentional positive and also served as a catalyst for more exclusion of people of color from the LGBTQ+ employees across the network to learn more narrative. about and join IPGLBT. As always, something like this is a team But with all the good we are doing at IPG, the effort and I would like to thank David Azulay, LGBTQ+ community has taken a few hits in Christina Cairns, Barbara Harris, Melynda the last year as well. We have seen a roll back Rowe, and Jeremy Thomas as well as all the in protections for employment and public fabulous individuals who have taken time accommodations. We’ve seen the Pentagon out of their busy schedules to dial in for the issues a policy banning trans individuals national calls, push us to do more, and share from serving openly in the military and the their perspectives. I also want to thank the IPG Department of Health and Human Services Diversity & Inclusion Team including Heide (along with several state legislatures) working Gardner, Bridgette O’Neal, and Sandy Chum- to deny healthcare coverage to trans people.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgender Rights Section Newsletter
    Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgender Rights Section Newsletter Vol. 8, No. 1 — October 2015 Chair’s Corner by C.J. Griffin hen I became chair in May at the Annual Meeting, I acknowledged that I had big shoes to fill. Our immediate past chair, Robyn Gigl, did a tremendous job W leading the section. I wondered how I could ever lead as well as she did. What I realized was that no one ever can be Robyn—but no one can ever be CJ, either. As I reflect on prior years, I can say with certainty that each and every year since I have been involved, the chair has brought something unique and special to the section. We have already had two general membership meetings this year, so I hope that what I intend to bring to the section has become self-evident, but: • I seek to more actively engage new members by leading through small committees, such as our CLE Committee, Community Outreach Committee, Legislative Commit- tee, Networking/Social Committee, Diversity Working Group, and Strategic Planning Committee. I hope new faces will become more involved and grow into leadership positions within the section. • I aim to make our general membership meetings more personal, where we discuss important topics in small groups so we can get to know each other and everyone feels comfortable sharing their ideas and experiences with the common goal of making the section even better. • I want to lead us toward strategic thinking. What is our core mission? What is our short-term plan and what is our long-term plan? Where have we been and where are we going? How do we get there? • I strive to tackle diversity issues that exist within our section and within the NJSBA at large: exploring how we can be more diverse in terms of race, age, experience, and legal practice areas; engaging in internal cultural competency around issues such as gender, polyamory, and other topics that are unfamiliar to some of us; and making all members feel welcome and embraced.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Health Issues for LGBT Populations Information & Resource Kit
    Top Health Issues for LGBT Populations Information & Resource Kit Top Health Issues for LGBT Populations Information & Resource Kit U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Center for Substance Abuse Prevention TOP HEALTH ISSUES FOR LGBT POPULATIONS INFORMATION & RESOURCE KIT Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Top Health Issues for LGBT Populations Information & Resource Kit was prepared by Alexander Camacho, Ph.D., CHES, CADC, CPP of the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) at the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Nancy Kennedy, Dr.P.H., and Emily Novick, M.P.P., at CSAP, and George Marcelle provided guidance and comments during the development and review of this publication. Editing and graphic designing was prepared by Abt Associates Inc. under contract number HHSS283200700008I/ HHSS28342001T for SAMHSA, HHS. David Wilson at SAMHSA served as Government Project Officer for this task. DISCLAIMER The views, opinions, and content of this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or policies of SAMHSA or HHS. PUBLIC DOMAIN NOTICE All materials appearing in this publication are in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission from SAMHSA. Citation of the source is appreciated. The publication may not be reproduced or distributed for a fee without the specific, written authorization of the Office of Communications, SAMHSA. ELECTRONIC ACCESS This publication may be downloaded or ordered at http://store.samhsa.gov/. Or call SAMHSA at 1-877-SAMHSA-7 (1-877-726-4727) (English and Español).
    [Show full text]
  • A Timeline of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender History in the United States
    A Timeline of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender History in the United States Adapted with permission from Out of the Past: 400 Years of Lesbian and Gay History in America (Byard, E. 1997, www.pbs.org/outofthepast) with additions and updates from Bending the Mold: An Action Kit for Transgender Youth (NYAC & Lambda Legal); The American Gay Rights Movement: A Timeline; Just the Facts about Sexual Orientation and Youth: A Primer for Principals, Educators, and School Personnel (Just the Facts Coalition). Additional materials and study guide by GSAFE (www.gsafewi.org) 2 A Timeline of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender History in the United States READ MORE WATCH Ways to Use this Timeline This resource has primarily been adapted Six of the people featured on the PBS timeline are This timeline was designed as a starting point for from PBS Online’s Out of the Past: 400 Years profiled in the documentary Out of the Past and classroom and student club discussions, exploration, and Lesbian and Gay History in America (Byard, have been marked with the bolded words WATCH research. A sample lesson plan is included. However, E., 1997, www.pbs.org/outofthepast/). The on this document. These individuals are: there are many additional ways to use this resource. interactive timeline online allows users to click on dates to read details about people, • Michael Wigglesworth The timeline can be printed, copied, and posted in full or in policies, and events that have shaped the • Sarah Orne Jewett part in the classroom, on a bulletin board, or in a display lives of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and • Henry Gerber case.
    [Show full text]
  • Movements and Memory: the Making of the Stonewall Myth
    Movements and Memory: The Making of the Stonewall Myth Elizabeth A. Armstrong Suzanna M. Crage Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana University, Bloomington This article examines why the Stonewall riots became central to gay collective memory while other events did not. It does so through a comparative-historical analysis of Stonewall and four events similar to it that occurred in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and New York in the 1960s. The Stonewall riots were remembered because they were the first to meet two conditions: activists considered the event commemorable and had the mnemonic capacity to create a commemorative vehicle. That this conjuncture occurred in New York in 1969, and not earlier or elsewhere, was a result of complex political developments that converged in this time and place. The success of the national commemorative ritual planned by New York activists depended on its resonance, not only in New York but also in other U.S. cities. Gay community members found Stonewall commemorable and the proposed parade an appealing form for commemoration. The parade was amenable to institutionalization, leading it to survive over time and spread around the world. The Stonewall story is thus an achievement of gay liberation rather than an account of its origins. n the evening of June 27, 1969, New York sexual bar in Greenwich Village. This was not Opolice raided the Stonewall Inn, a homo- unusual: police raids of homosexual bars were common in New York and other American cities in the 1960s. This time, however, bar patrons Direct correspondence to Elizabeth A. Armstrong, fought back instead of passively enduring humil- Department of Sociology, Ballantine Hall 744, 1020 iating treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Pride Festival Buenos Aires, Argentina Texas Freedom Parade TBD TBD July 14 TBD U.S.A
    Major LGBT Global Events Updated December 1, 2013 Boston, Mass., U.S.A. Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A. Fire Island, N.Y., U.S.A. Humboldt, Calif., U.S.A. AMERICAS Boston Youth Pride 2014 Cleveland Pride Ascension Fire Island Humboldt Pride Parade Albany, N.Y., U.S.A. TBD Jun 28 TBD and Festival Capital Pride 2014 May 28 – Jun 8 Boston, Mass., U.S.A. Colorado Springs, Colo., Flagstaff, Ariz., U.S.A. TBD Latino Pride 2014 U.S.A. Pride in the Pines Indianapolis, Ind., U.S.A. Albany, N.Y., U.S.A. TBD Colorado Springs TBD Indy Pride Say It Loud! Black and Pride 2014 TBD Latino Gay Pride Boston, Mass., U.S.A. TBD Florianopolis, Brazil TBD Boston Dyke March Florianopolis Pride Indianapolis, Ind., U.S.A. Jun 13 Columbia, S.C., U.S.A. Feb 28 - Mar 5 Indiana Black Gay Pride Albuquerque, N.M., U.S.A. South Carolina Pride TBD Albuquerque Pride Boulder, Colo., U.S.A. Festival Fort Collins, Colo., U.S.A. Jun 31 Boulder PrideFest TBD Fort Collins PrideFest 2014 Jackson, Miss., U.S.A. TBD TBD Jackson Black Pride Allentown, Pa., U.S.A. Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A. TBD Pride in the Park 2014 Butte, Mont., U.S.A. Columbus Gay Pride Fort Lauderdale, Fla., Long Island, NY, U.S.A. Moncton, Canada Oklahoma City, Okla., Provincetown, Mass., San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A. Spencer, Ind., U.S.A. Bucharest, Romania Helsinki, Finland Munich, Germany Siegen, Germany Mumbai, India TBD Montana Pride Jun 20 – 21 U.S.A.
    [Show full text]