Quantum Algebras and Integrable Boundaries in Ads/CFT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Quantum Algebras and Integrable Boundaries in Ads/CFT Quantum Algebras and Integrable Boundaries in AdS/CFT VIDAS REGELSKIS Dissertation submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of York Department of Mathematics September 2012 i Abstract This thesis studies quantum integrable structures such as Yangians and quantum affine algebras that arise in and are inspired by the AdS/CFT duality, with a primary emphasis on the exploration of integrable boundaries deeply hidden in the duality. The main goal of this thesis is to find novel algebraic structures and methods that could lead to new horizons in the theory of quantum groups and in the exploration of boundary effects in the gauge/gravity dualities. The main thrust of this work is the exploration of the AdS/CFT worlsheet scatter- ing theory and of integrable boundaries that manifest themselves as Dp-branes (p + 1- dimensional Dirichlet submanifolds) which are a necessary part of the superstring the- ory. The presence of these objects breaks some of the underlying symmetries and leads to boundary scattering theory governed by coideal subalgebras of the bulk symmetry. Here the boundary scattering theory for D3-, D5- and D7-branes is considered in detail, and the underlying boundary Yangian symmetries are revealed. The AdS/CFT worldsheet scattering theory is shown to be closely related to that of the deformed Hubbard chain. This similarity allows us to apply the quantum deformed approach to the boundary scattering theory. Such treatment of the system leads to quan- tum affine symmetries that manifest themselves in a very elegant and compact form. In such a way the symmetries of distinct boundaries that previously seemed to be unrelated to each other emerge in a uniform and coherent form. The quantum deformed approach also helps us to better understand the phenomena of the so-called secret symmetry. It is called secret due to its peculiar feature of appear- ing as a level-one generator of the Yangian of the system. However it does not have a Lie algebra (level-zero) analogue. This symmetry is shown to have origins in the quan- tum deformed model, where it manifest itselfs as two, level-one and level-minus-one, generators of the corresponding quantum affine algebra. ii Contents Abstract i Preface vi Acknowledgements vii Declaration viii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Integrability and the algebraic Bethe ansatz for spin chains . .2 1.2 Hopf algebras and the YBE . .8 1.3 Reflection algebras and the BYBE . 10 1.4 Integrability in AdS/CFT . 14 1.5 Outline . 19 2 Reflection algebras 21 2.1 Preliminaries . 23 2.1.1 Coideal subalgebras for quantum deformed algebras . 24 2.1.2 Coideal subalgebras for Yangian algebras . 32 2.2 Reflection algebras for Uq(slb(2)) ......................... 36 2.2.1 Singlet boundary . 36 2.2.2 Vector boundary . 38 2.3 Reflection algebras for Y(sl(2)) ......................... 41 2.3.1 Singlet boundary . 42 2.3.2 Vector boundary . 43 2.3.3 Yangian limit . 45 2.4 Reflection algebras for Uq(glb(1j1)) ........................ 47 2.4.1 Singlet boundary . 48 2.4.2 Vector boundary . 49 2.5 Reflection algebras for Y(gl(1j1)) ........................ 51 2.5.1 Singlet boundary . 52 2.5.2 Vector boundary . 53 2.5.3 Yangian limit . 55 A The Yangian limit of Uq(slb(2)) .......................... 57 iii iv 3 Integrable boundaries in AdS/CFT 59 3.1 Worldsheet scattering . 61 3.1.1 Underlying symmetries . 61 3.1.1.1 Lie algebra . 61 3.1.1.2 Yangian . 65 3.1.2 S-matrix . 67 3.2 Boundary scattering . 72 3.2.1 The spectrum of boundaries . 72 3.2.2 Reflected algebra . 73 3.3 Giant gravitons . 75 3.3.1 Y=0 giant graviton . 77 3.3.1.1 Boundary symmetries . 77 3.3.1.2 Boundary scattering . 78 3.3.1.3 Mirror model . 83 3.3.2 Z=0 giant graviton . 85 3.3.2.1 Boundary symmetries . 85 3.3.2.2 Boundary scattering . 88 3.4 D3-D7 brane system . 91 3.4.1 Z=0 D7-brane . 91 3.4.1.1 Boundary symmetries . 92 3.4.1.2 Boundary scattering . 93 3.4.2 Y=0 D7-brane . 95 3.5 D3-D5 brane system . 95 3.5.1 Achiral boundary conditions in the bosonic Principal Chiral Model 95 3.5.2 The D5-brane: general considerations . 99 3.5.3 The horizontal D5-brane . 104 3.5.4 The vertical D5-brane . 108 B Reflection matrices . 115 4 q-deformed scattering in AdS/CFT 119 4.1 Quantum affine algebra Qb ............................ 122 4.1.1 Quantum deformation of psu(2j2)C ................... 122 4.1.2 Affine Extension . 123 4.1.3 Quantum oscillators and representations . 125 4.1.3.1 q-Oscillators . 125 4.1.3.2 Affine extension . 128 4.1.3.3 Summary . 130 4.2 q-deformed S-matrix . 132 4.2.1 Scattering in subspace I . 134 4.2.2 Scattering in subspace II . 141 4.2.3 Scattering in subspace III . 143 4.2.4 Special cases of the S-matrix . 145 4.2.4.1 Fundamental S-matrix . 145 4.2.4.2 The S-matrix SQ1 ....................... 147 v 4.3 q-deformed boundary scattering . 148 4.3.1 Quantum affine coideal subalgebras . 148 4.3.2 Reflected algebra . 149 4.4 q-deformed Y=0 giant graviton . 151 4.4.1 Coideal subalgebra . 152 4.4.2 Boundary scattering . 154 4.5 q-deformed Z=0 giant graviton . 159 4.5.1 Coideal subalgebra . 159 4.5.2 Boundary scattering . 163 4.6 q-deformed Z=0 D7-brane . 163 4.6.1 Coideal subalgebra . 164 4.6.2 Boundary scattering . 165 C Elements of the S-matrix . 166 C.1 Subspace II . 166 C.2 Subspace III . 169 D Elements of the special cases of the S-matrix . 172 D.1 Elements of the fundamental S-matrix . 172 D.2 Elements of the S-matrix SQ1 ...................... 173 E Yang-Baxter equation . 176 F q-deformed reflection matrices . 177 5 Secret symmetries of the AdS/CFT scattering matrices 183 5.1 Secret symmetries of the S-matrix . 184 5.2 Secret symmetries of the K-matrices . 186 5.2.1 Y = 0 giant graviton . 186 5.2.2 D5-brane . 187 5.3 Secret symmetries of the q-deformed S-matrix . 190 5.3.1 The quantum affine superalgebra Uq(glb(1j1)) ............. 190 5.3.1.1 Chevalley-Serre realization . 190 5.3.1.2 Drinfeld’s second realization . 191 5.3.1.3 Fundamental representation . 192 5.3.2 The quantum affine superalgebra Uq(glb(2j2)) ............. 193 5.3.2.1 Drinfeld’s second realization . 193 5.3.2.2 Fundamental representation . 195 5.3.3 Deformed quantum affine algebra Qb .................. 199 5.3.3.1 Conventional affine limit . 200 5.3.3.2 q-deformed AdS/CFT: the Secret symmetry . 203 Conclusions and Outlook 207 Bibliography 209 vi Preface This manuscript will take the reader to a magical world of symmetries, where Yangian and quantum affine algebras converge. It will lead on a magnificent journey following a yellow-brick road of a superstring of infinite length and light-cone momentum through- 5 out the AdS5 × S spacetime. We will encounter various D-branes blocking our way and will find elegant integrable solutions giving a safe bypass from these obstacles. The experience gained will allow the reader a glimpse into an even more extraor- dinary world of quantum deformations, where the previously encountered structures emerge in completely new prospects and require more elaborate methods for being con- quered. The final part of the manuscript will lead to a quest for the origins of the secret sym- metry. This quest will require to scout through many strange worlds of quantum sym- metries that are fearlessly protecting secrets of the AdS/CFT. vii Acknowledgements I am very thankful to my PhD supervisor Niall MacKay for his support and inspiration over the past four years, and especially for bringing me to this fascinating field of re- search. I especially thank my collaborators, D. Correa, M. de Leeuw, T. Matsumoto, S. Mori- yama, A. Torrielli and C. Young, for the work we did together in the quest of integrability in the AdS/CFT duality, and without whom I would have not succeeded in having such a fruitful experience of research. I also want to thank all members of the AdS/CFT community, including Ch. Ahn, N. Beisert, A. Dekkel, N. Drukker, N. Gromov, B. Hoare, T. Lukowski, R. Nepomechie, B. Schwab, P. Vieira, K. Zoubos and many others for innumerable discussions, for inspir- ing talks I was honoured to listen to in many meetings that I was pleased to attend, even though sometimes I had to travel half of the globe, and for the many comments I have received upon my work. There are also a number of people outside the AdS/CFT community whom I want to thank. In particular I want to thank S. Kolb and P. Sutcliffe, whom I have benefited a lot from communicating with. I also what to thank all remembers of the Department of Mathematics of the Uni- versity of York, especially members of the mathematical physics group, H. Bostelmann, P. Bush, E. Corrigan, G. Delius, Ch. Fewster, E. Hawkins, A. Higuchi, D. Hunt, B. Kay, L. Loveridge, E. Sklyanin and B. Vicedo. I also want to take a change to thank S. Nor- vaisas for supervising me during my studies at Vilnius University, and also everyone with whom I had pleasure to have challenging discussions in fundamental physics, – A. Acus, Th. Gajdosik, A.
Recommended publications
  • 25 Years of Quantum Groups: from Definition to Classification A
    Acta Polytechnica Vol. 48 No. 2/2008 25 Years of Quantum Groups: from Definition to Classification A. Stolin In mathematics and theoretical physics, quantum groups are certain non-commutative, non-cocommutative Hopf algebras, which first appeared in the theory of quantum integrable models and later they were formalized by Drinfeld and Jimbo. In this paper we present a classification scheme for quantum groups, whose classical limit is a polynomial Lie algebra. As a consequence we obtain deformed XXX and XXZ Hamiltonians. Keywords: Lie bialgebra, quantum group, Yang-Baxter equation, quantization, classical twist, quantum twist, integrable model. 1 Definition of quantum groups, Lie Further, it is well-known that the Lie algebra L such that bialgebras and twists AAh = U()L is unique: In mathematics and theoretical physics, quantum groups L =Î{}aaaaAAh :()D =Ä+Ä11 . are certain non-commutative algebras that first appeared in h = the theory of quantum integrable models, and which were If A is a quantum group with AAUL(),thenL pos- then formalized by Drinfeld and Jimbo. sesses a new structure, which is called a Lie bialgebra structure Nowadays quantum groups are one of the most popular d, and it is given by: objects in modern mathematical physics. They also play a sig- - d()xaa=-hh1 (DD ()op ())mod , nificant role in other areas of mathematics. It turned out that quantum groups provide invariants of knots, and that they where a is an inverse image of x in A. In particular, the classi- can be used in quantization of Poisson brackets on manifolds. $ cal limit of Uq()g is g, the classical limit of Uq(g) is the affine Quantum groups gave birth to quantum geometry, quantum - calculus, quantum special functions and many other “quan- Kac-Moody algebra, which is a central extension of g[,uu 1 ], tum” areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Lectures on Representation Theory and Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov Equations, 1998 57 Marc Levine, Mixed Motives, 1998 56 Leonid I
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/surv/058 Selected Titles in This Series 58 Pavel I. Etingof, Igor B. Frenkel, and Alexander A. Kirillov, Jr., Lectures on representation theory and Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov equations, 1998 57 Marc Levine, Mixed motives, 1998 56 Leonid I. Korogodski and Yan S. Soibelman, Algebras of functions on quantum groups: Part I, 1998 55 J. Scott Carter and Masahico Saito, Knotted surfaces and their diagrams, 1998 54 Casper Goffman, Togo Nishiura, and Daniel Waterman, Homeomorphisms in analysis, 1997 53 Andreas Kriegl and Peter W. Michor, The convenient setting of global analysis, 1997 52 V. A. Kozlov, V. G. Maz'ya, and J. Rossmann, Elliptic boundary value problems in domains with point singularities, 1997 51 Jan Maly and William P. Ziemer, Fine regularity of solutions of elliptic partial differential equations, 1997 50 Jon Aaronson, An introduction to infinite ergodic theory, 1997 49 R. E. Showalter, Monotone operators in Banach space and nonlinear partial differential equations, 1997 48 Paul-Jean Cahen and Jean-Luc Chabert, Integer-valued polynomials, 1997 47 A. D. Elmendorf, I. Kriz, M. A. Mandell, and J. P. May (with an appendix by M. Cole), Rings, modules, and algebras in stable homotopy theory, 1997 46 Stephen Lipscomb, Symmetric inverse semigroups, 1996 45 George M. Bergman and Adam O. Hausknecht, Cogroups and co-rings in categories of associative rings, 1996 44 J. Amoros, M. Burger, K. Corlette, D. Kotschick, and D. Toledo, Fundamental groups of compact Kahler manifolds, 1996 43 James E. Humphreys, Conjugacy classes in semisimple algebraic groups, 1995 42 Ralph Freese, Jaroslav Jezek, and J.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1808.02294V4 [Math.QA]
    YANGIANS AND BAXTER’S RELATIONS HUAFENG ZHANG Abstract. We study a category O of representations of the Yangian associ- ated to an arbitrary finite-dimensional complex simple Lie algebra. We obtain asymptotic modules as analytic continuation of a family of finite-dimensional modules, the Kirillov–Reshetikhin modules. In the Grothendieck ring we es- tablish the three-term Baxter’s TQ relations for the asymptotic modules. We indicate that Hernandez–Jimbo’s limit construction can also be applied, re- sulting in modules over anti-dominantly shifted Yangians. Keywords: Yangians, asymptotic representations, tensor products. Mathematics Subject Classification: 17B37, 17B10, 17B80. Introduction Fix g to be a finite-dimensional complex simple Lie algebra, and ~ a non-zero complex number. The universal enveloping algebra of the current algebra g C C[t], ⊗ as a co-commutative Hopf algebra, can be deformed to the Yangian Y~(g). The latter is a Hopf algebra neither commutative nor co-commutative, and it contains the universal enveloping algebra of g as a sub-Hopf-algebra. In this paper we are interested in a category of representations of Y~(g). Its O objects are Y~(g)-modules which, viewed as g-modules, belong to the category of Bernstein–Gelfand–Gelfand (BGG for short) without integrability assumption [31]. Category contains all finite-dimensional modules, it is abelian and monoidal, and its GrothendieckO ring is commutative thanks to a highest weight classification of irreducible objects, a common phenomenon in Lie Theory. As a prototype, consider the Lie algebra sl2 of traceless two-by-two matrices. It admits the vector representation on C2 by matrix multiplication, and the infinite- dimensional Verma module Mx of highest weight x C.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Affine Algebras and Holonomic Difference Equations
    Commun. Math. Phys. 146, 1-60 (1992) Communicationsin Mathematical Physics Springer-Verlag 1992 Quantum Affine Algebras and Holonomic Difference Equations I.B. Frenkel 1 and N. Yu. Reshetikhin 2 1 Department of Mathematics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA 2 Department of Mathematics, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA Received September 19, 1991; in revised form November 15, 1991 Abstract. We derive new holonomic q-difference equations for the matrix coefficients of the products of intertwining operators for quantum affine algebra Uq(O) representa- tions of level k. We study the connection opertors between the solutions with different asymptotics and show that they are given by products of elliptic theta functions. We prove that the connection operators automatically provide elliptic solutions of Yang- Baxter equations in the "face" formulation for any type of Lie algebra g and arbitrary finite-dimensional representations of Uq(~). We conjecture that these solutions of the Yang-Baxter equations cover all elliptic solutions known in the contexts of IRF models of statistical mechanics. We also conjecture that in a special limit when q ---+ 1 these solutions degenerate again into Uq,(~) solutions with q' = exp \k-~9,]" We also study the simplest examples of solutions of our holonomic difference equations asso- ciated to Uq(~[(2)) and find their expressions in terms of basic (or q-)-hypergeometric series. In the special case of spin - g~ representations, we demonstrate that the connec- tion matrix yields a famous Baxter solution of the Yang-Baxter equation corresponding to the solid-on-solid model of statistical mechanics. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertex Algebras and Quantum Groups
    Vertex Algebras and Quantum Groups Yuly Billig (Carleton University), Michael Lau (Laval University), Antun Milas (SUNY-Albany), Kailash Misra (North Carolina State University) February 7 – February 12, 2016. 1 Overview of the Field During the twentieth century, the theory of Lie algebras, both finite- and infinite-dimensional, has been a major area of mathematical research with numerous applications. In particular, during the late 1970s and early 1980s, the representation theory of Kac-Moody Lie algebras (analogs of finite-dimensional semisimple Lie algebras) generated intense interest. The early development of the subject was driven by its remarkable connections with combinatorics, group theory, number theory, partial differential equations, and topology, as well as by its deep links with areas of physics, including integrable systems, statistical mechanics, and two-dimensional conformal field theory. In particular, the representation theory of an important class of infinite-dimensional Lie algebras known as affine Lie algebras led to the discovery of both vertex algebras and quantum groups in the mid-1980s. Motivated by the appearance of vertex operators in the construc- tion of the Moonshine module, Borcherds introduced vertex operator algebras as part of his proof of the Moonshine Conjectures in 1986. (He received the Fields Medal for this accomplishment in 1998.) These are the precise algebraic counterparts to chiral algebras in 2-dimensional conformal field theory as formalized by Belavin, Polyakov, and Zamolodchikov. Among other applications, these algebras play a crucial role in string theory, integrable systems, M-theory, and quantum gravity. In 1985, the interaction of affine Lie alge- bras with integrable systems led Drinfeld and Jimbo to introduce quantized universal enveloping algebras, or quantum groups, associated with symmetrizable Kac-Moody algebras.
    [Show full text]