Theology and the (Post)Apartheid Condition R Ian V Enter ( E Ditor)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UNIVERSITY OF THE FREE STATE VOLUME 1 THEOLOGICAL EXPLORATIONS THEOLOGY AND AND THEOLOGY THEOLOGY AND THE T ( ) HE (pos HE POST APARTHEID T CONDITION )apAR T HEID CONDI HEID T ION R ian V enter ( E ditor) Rian Venter EDITOR ISBN 978-1-920382-90-2 9 781920 382902 www.sun-e-shop.co.za Theology and the (post)apartheid condition: Genealogies and future directions Published by SUN MeDIA Bloemfontein under the SUN PReSS imprint. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2016 SUN MeDIA Bloemfontein and the Author(s) This publication was subjected to an independent double-blind peer evaluation by the Publisher. The author(s) and publisher have made every effort to obtain permission for and acknowledge the use of copyrighted material. Please refer enquiries to the publisher. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any electronic, photographic or mechanical means, including photocopying and recording on record, tape or laser disk, on microfilm, via the Internet, by e-mail, or by any other information storage and retrieval system, without prior written permission by the publisher. First edition 2016 ISBN 978-1-920382-90-2 (Print) ISBN 978-1-920382-91-9 (Online) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18820/9781920382919 Set in Adobe Garamond Pro 12/16 Cover design and typesetting by SUN MeDIA Bloemfontein. SUN PRESS is an imprint of AFRICAN SUN MeDIA. Academic, professional and reference works are published under this imprint in print and electronic format. This publication may be ordered directly from www.sun-e-shop.co.za. Produced by SUN MeDIA Bloemfontein. www.africansunmedia.co.za africansunmedia.snapplify.com (e-books) www.sun-e-shop.co.za Chapter 1 Mapping the (post)apartheid condition: Interrogating theological disciplines Rian Venter 1 1. Background: Discourses on theological education Reflection on theological education, internationally and in South Africa, displays a particular vibrant quality and the publications on this are like a never-ending stream. This could be indicative of dissatisfaction with the quality and relevance of the training, or a responsiveness to the demands of a drastically changing environment. In the context of this research project the shape of the state of scholarship on the academic study of theology is pertinent. What are the questions being asked and what are the issues addressed? An overview of the South Africa reflection conveys a sense of the realization of changing times, and also a wide range of interests. See for example contributions by Bosch (1991), Brown (1994), Buitendag (2014), Conradie (1997), Dames (2010), Deist (1994), Higgs (2015), Landman (2013), Lategan (1993), Lombaard (2016), Maluleke (2006), Naidoo (2008 & 2016), Naude (2004), Robinson and Smit (1996), Smit (1993), Trisk (2015) and Wethmar (1996). The contribution of South Africans to the massive World Council of Churches project Handbook of Theological Education in Africa(see Phiri & Werner 2013) should be carefully studied as it conveys an insight into some of the latest concerns in this reflection. There is interest in the future; a focus on new challenges like 1 Department of Systematic Theology, Faculty of Theology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa. 13 PART 1 GENERAL PERSPECTIVES HIV and Aids, violence to women, ecology, and natural sciences; and attention is given to confessional identity and spiritual formation. The emphasis on Africa is strong and explicit, and a few explorations attend to specific fields of study like Biblical Studies, Mission and Pastoral Theology. Despite its commendable wide and inclusive scope, what is not addressed is conspicuous: the space of the public university for studying theology, the discourse of transformation in higher education in South Africa, and the deeper and sophisticated reaches into epistemology as such. The specific contributions of the Faculty of Theology at the University of the Free State should be mentioned. In 2010, a conference was organised on the theme of ‘Faith, Religion and the Public University’ and the contributions were later published (see Venter 2011). The investigation was continued in 2012 with a focus on what epistemological transformation might entail and the various perspectives were published in the volume Transforming Theological Education (Venter & Tolmie 2012). It has become clear that the public university as public institution poses its own set of challenges to theology and this should be realised. Furthermore, the discourse on transformation is multi-layered and entails more than issues like the demographics of students, leadership and lecturers, but includes matters of language, symbols and institutional culture and ethos. And quite crucial – it requires an interrogation of the entire knowledge project, the knowledge transmitted in the curriculum and the knowledge generated in research. During these faculty projects, it has crystallised, gradually and increasingly, that knowledge is inevitably mediated by disciplines. Investigation of theological practices requires attention to individual study fields such as New Testament, Church History and Missiology. A specific form of discourse should be initiated: how are disciplines to be transformed? This should be theorised and a number of critical questions emerge here, for example, what is distinctive about a ‘discipline’, what is the relationship between a social condition and the character of a discipline, how do disciplines legitimatise or critique a social order, and what does disciplinary accountability entail? In the South African context, the critical relationship between theological disciplines and apartheid in this discourse becomes inevitable, as does the question of responsibility in the 14 Mapping the (post)apartheid condition post-1994 democratic era. The present research project intends to contribute to this theorisation. 2. Horizon: The (post)apartheid condition It would be possible to start with the disciplines, but another and more productive approach would be to enquire about the character of the horizon itself and then immediately one is confronted with a dilemma: how does one describe this? Obviously, a daunting task is at stake, a task fundamentally hermeneutical. A complex and multi-faceted reality is to be represented and to be distilled into a few manageable categories. This endeavour is also deeply fraught with the very concerns and interests of the cartographer. Five perspectives are suggested here. A first referent to name this horizon could hardly be anything else but apartheid itself. To name the situation ‘(post)apartheid’ instead of ‘post-apartheid’ signals the continued presence of the scars of this ideological and social experiment. South African has not yet left this behind and has not undone all the discriminatory practices. Doing theology is thinking with this reality as a constant cognitive companion. However, this implies more than mere memory; it implies an interpretation what this inherently and essentially entailed. Various evaluations have also been forwarded (see e.g. Dubow 2014:290-310). Doing responsible theology would at least require a minimal and working understanding of what shaped the mind of South Africans; what experiences formed the South African self. The insidious mentality to downplay the severity of apartheid should be resisted. A second interpretative strategy could be to identify the configuration of several constituent elements of South African public life. This is a distinct and evolving reality formed by politics, economics, social relations, culture, intellectual traditions and religion. Each one of these obviously warrants in-depth reflection and involves contestation. The emergence of patronage politics, the deepening of economic disparity and an alarming unemployment rate, the perpetuation of social alienation and racial prejudice, the pursuit of ethnic and exclusive identity manifestations, and the growth of reactionary and fundamentalistic religious affinities all deserve mentioning. The catalogue of descriptors has 15 PART 1 GENERAL PERSPECTIVES become fairly standardised: violence, intolerance, corruption, poverty, land, service delivery, etc. A sense of crisis is pervasively present. A large number of books have been published taking stock of the contemporary situation in recent years and the titles convey an undeniable impression of an emerging genre of pessimism. See for example, What’s Gone Wrong? South Africa on the Brink of Failed Statehood (Boraine 2014), A Rumour of Spring: South Africa after 20 Years of Democracy (Du Preez 2013), What if There Were no Whites in South Africa? (Haffajee 2015), How long will South Africa Survive: The Looming Crisis (Johnson 2015), We Have Now Begun Our Descent: How to Stop South Africa Losing its Way (Malala 2015), Wat Nou, Suid-Afrika? (Eloff 2016). It would be reductionist to describe the South African landscape in merely crisis vocabulary. It would be irresponsible to distort the face of a vibrant country with an immensely rich plurality. However, the psychological impact of these social dynamics is significant and should be accounted for. This generates a third perspective on the (post)apartheid condition – the pathology of its psychosociality.2 The presence of anger, fear, disillusionment and hopelessness in the South African collective psyche should not be underestimated. ‘Cynicism’ could be an appropriate label to capture this state of mind. Any theology should recognise this manifestation of the experience of the (post)apartheid condition. A certain distinctiveness