Community Change: a Nder Son a Nd Patr Ici a a Ici Patr Nd a Son Nder

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Community Change: a Nder Son a Nd Patr Ici a a Ici Patr Nd a Son Nder edited By Karen CommunityFul Change: B r ight- Community Change: a nderson and Patricia Theories, Practice, and Evidence Practice, and Theories, Theories, Practice, and Evidence edited By Karen FulBr ight-a nderson and Patricia ausPos a us P os 06-001 Community Change: Theories, Practice, and Evidence edited By Karen FulBr ight-a nderson and Patricia ausPos Extended Uses The Aspen Institute encourages the use of this document. Reproductions in whole or in part are allowable without permission provided appropriate documentation is given. To Order Additional copies of Community Change: Theories, Practice, and Evidence can be obtained from: The Aspen Institute Fulfillment Office P.O. Box 222 109 Houghton Lab Lane Queenstown, Maryland 21658 Phone: 410-820-5338 Fax: 410-827-9174 E-mail: [email protected] Copyright © 2006 by The Aspen Institute The Aspen Institute One Dupont Circle Washington, D.C. 20036-1133 Published in the United States of America in 2006 by The Aspen Institute. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN # 0-89843-444-0 Pub. No.: 06-001 Suggested citation: Aspen Institute Roundtable on Community Change. Community Change: Theories, Practice, and Evidence. Edited by Karen Fulbright-Anderson and Patricia Auspos. Washington, D.C.: Aspen Institute, 2006. About the Aspen Institute Roundtable on Community Change he Roundtable on Community Change was established as a forum in Twhich leaders working on some of the country’s most innovative and promising efforts to revitalize poor communities can meet to discuss the lessons that are being learned by community initiatives across the country and to work on common challenges they are facing. Since 1995, the Roundtable has focused on the problems associated with evaluating community-based interventions and has issued several publications exploring various dimensions of evaluation theory, methods, measurement, and analysis. (See www.aspenroundtable.org.) This volume complements that line of work by distilling, from research and ex- perience, the theories of change that appear to be guiding community change efforts and synthesizing evidence about the effectiveness of these efforts. The Roundtable’s other work includes projects to: increase understanding of the ways in which structural racism affects poor communities and the pros- pects for revitalization and improvements in the life chances of their residents; examine the contribution of community-building strategies to improving so- cial, economic, and civic outcomes for children, youth, families, and neighbor- hoods; build the capacity of local governments and communities to work more effectively toward common goals; and explore and apply innovative learning methodologies to community-building topics. Acknowledgments e are indebted to the numerous people who assisted us in the develop- Wment and production of this volume. The editors thank, first and fore- most, the authors who contributed their work to this volume. We are grateful as well to those who served as project advisors, providing early guidance for this work. Accordingly, we would like to extend our thanks to: Prudence Brown, Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago; Phillip Clay, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; James Connell, Institute for Research and Reform in Education; Claudia Coulton, Case Western Reserve University; Ronald Register, Murtis H. Taylor Multi-Service Center; Margaret Beale Spencer, University of Pennsylvania; and Carol Weiss, Harvard University. Bennett Harrison, who is now deceased, was also an important member of this advisory group. In addition, we benefited from the guidance and financial support provided by Bonnie Politz of the Center for Youth Development and Policy Research at the Academy for Educational Development. Support from the following philanthropies made this volume possible: The Annie E. Casey Foundation, The Edna McConnell Clark Foundation, The Ford Foundation, The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, The F. B. Heron Foundation, The W. K. Kellogg Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, The Pew Charitable Trusts, The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and The Rockefeller Foundation. Developing and producing this volume would not have been possible without the financial sup- port of these organizations, and for this we are grateful. The editors would like to thank Julia Vitullo-Martin for her insightful and conscientious editing and Thebe Street in Minneapolis for creating the design and layout and overseeing the printing of this volume. We would also like to thank Marcus Weiss from the Economic Develop- ment Assistance Consortium and colleagues from the Institute for Education and Social Policy at New York University for their insightful reviews. Roundtable staff members Andrea A. Anderson and Anne Kubisch were helpful to us in many ways as we produced this volume. We thank them for their assistance and for being such good colleagues. Finally, the Aspen Roundtable staff benefits from incredible leadership and support. The co- chairs of the Roundtable—Harold Richman and Lisbeth Schorr—and our Roundtable members provide inspiration, wisdom, and guidance on all of the staff’s activities. The authors and editors are solely responsible for the accuracy of the state- ments and interpretations contained within this publication. Such interpreta- tions do not necessarily reflect the views of the contributing foundations. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION Community Change: Implications for Complex Community Initiatives Karen Fulbright-a nder son 9 PART 1 | PROMOTING CHANGE THROUGH COMMUNITY LEVEL INTERVENTIONS Chapter 1 | Social Capital and Community Building a ndr e a a. a nderson and sharon Milligan 21 Chapter 2 | Promoting Safe and Healthy Neighborhoods: What Research Tells Us about Intervention a Mie M. schucK a nd dennis p. rosenbauM 61 Chapter 3 | Improving a Neighborhood’s Residential Environment: Pathways to Physical and Social Change Melv in l a pr a de a nd patr ici a auspos 141 Chapter 4 | Community Economic Development and Community Change héctor cor dero-guzM á n a nd patr ici a auspos 195 PART 2 | PROMOTING CHANGE THROUGH COMMUNITY BASED INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY INTERVENTIONS Chapter 5 | Community Action and Youth Development: What Can Be Done and How Can We Measure Progress? Michell e a lberti g a Mbone 269 Chapter 6 | Theories of Change for Community Interventions in Education g ail Meister 323 Chapter 7 | Social Service Systems Reform in Poor Neighborhoods: What We Know and What We Need to Find Out ch a r l es bru ner 387 Chapter 8 | Community-Focused Efforts to Increase Employment: Strategies, Theories of Change, Outcomes, and Measures patr ici a auspos 483 Contributors 552 INTRODUCTION Community Change: Implications for Complex Community Initiatives Karen Fulbright-a nder son iterature on urban community dynamics is replete with examinations of Lthe process of decline. This focus on decline is evident in early and contem- porary examinations of community life. As Phillip Clay observed in 1979: The last ten years have witnessed an unprecedented analysis of the prob- lems of the cities. The maladies of urban areas have been trumpeted by politicians, the media, and professional and academic journals. This de- preciation is associated with the widespread and continuing loss of middle- class households, the exodus of industry and consequent loss of jobs, the decline of many public institutions, and the growing loss of confidence in city neighborhoods as desirable places to live.1 Nearly twenty years later, Dennis Keating and Janet Smith noted little change in the focus of urban theorists, researchers and observers: Theories of neighborhood change identify conditions that alter the status quo of urban neighborhoods. Particular attention has been given to the physical, institutional, and social factors that cause neighborhoods to be- come unstable or to decline.2 Page 10 | Karen Fulbright-Anderson These examinations of the causes of inner-city blight have been helpful in rais- ing awareness about the severity of the problems faced by poor communities, but do little to inform efforts to promote positive community change. The abil- ity of residents, community-based organizations, funders, and policymakers to strengthen communities could surely be facilitated by information about interventions and factors that promote positive change in communities and foster community resilience. A growing body of literature has begun to document encouraging lessons about interventions and factors that contribute to positive changes in commu- nities. While the evidence base is, for the most part, neither strong nor robust enough to provide definitive answers to some of the most vexing questions about community change, the literature points to promising areas that deserve sustained, careful attention. The purpose of this volume is to pull such insights together in one place. The volume includes reviews of literature from the following programmatic areas, hereafter referred to as strands—community building, neighborhood safe- ty, education, employment, economic development, housing, youth development, and social services. The authors draw on the experiences of a range of commu- nity-based efforts to bring about positive community change, including formal organizations, such as community development corporations and comprehensive community initiatives, and less formal associations of community residents. The comprehensive community initiatives (CCIs) to which the
Recommended publications
  • 2004 Inside Front Cover of Book Is Blank MICHIGAN HISTORICAL CENTER 2004 Annual Report
    2004 Inside Front cover of book is blank MICHIGAN HISTORICAL CENTER 2004 Annual Report © 2005 Michigan Historical Center This annual report was produced by the staff of Michigan History magazine, a part of the Michigan Historical Center, Michigan Department of History, Arts and Libraries. www.michiganhistory.org This page is blank. Table of Contents Administration ....................................................................5 Michigan History.................................................................9 Archaeology.....................................................................13 Records Management .......................................................17 Michigan Historical Museum .............................................21 State Archives...................................................................27 State Historic Preservation Office .......................................31 Commissions....................................................................43 Donors ............................................................................47 2004 ANNUAL REPORT | 5 ADMINISTRATION n 1873 a joint legislative resolution directed the state librarian to collect “books, pamphlets, or papers pertaining to the Ihistory of Michigan,” as well as “Indian relics, and curiosities of any kind,” and to make the “cabinet so collected . open for the inspection of all persons.” Two years later, the state made its first appropriation for preserving its history—one thousand dollars to sup- port the Pioneer Society of Michigan in its
    [Show full text]
  • Theory of Change Primer
    Theory of Change Primer A STAP Advisory Document November 2020 LEAD STAP AUTHOR: Mark Stafford Smith STAP CONTRIBUTORS: Rosie Cooney, Graciela Metternicht, Blake Ratner, Jamidu Katima, Saleem Ali, and Rosina Bierbaum STAP SECRETARIAT CONTRIBUTORS: Christopher Whaley and Guadalupe Durón SUGGESTED CITATION: Stafford Smith, M. 2020. Theory of Change Primer, A STAP Advisory Document. Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel to the Global Environment Facility. Washington, D.C. COPYRIGHT: This work is shared under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivative Works License. ABOUT STAP: The Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel (STAP) provides independent scientific and technical advice to the GEF on its strategies, programs and projects. https://stapgef.org ABOUT GEF: The Global Environment Facility (GEF) was established on the eve of the 1992 Rio Earth Summit to help tackle our planet’s most pressing environmental problems. Since then, the GEF has provided close to $20.5 billion in grants and mobilized an additional $112 billion in co-financing for more than 4,800 projects in 170 countries. Through its Small Grants Programme, the GEF has provided support to nearly 24,000 civil society and community initiatives in 133 countries. http://www.thegef.org COPY EDITOR: Emily Youers DESIGN AND LAYOUT: Phoenix Design Aid A/S, Denmark COVER PHOTOS: Ron Ramtang, Marius Dobilas, Marion Smith – Byers, Lucy Brown, Tati Nova photo Mexico, Jimmy Tran, Uwe Bergwitz, by VLADGRIN Theory of Change Primer A STAP Advisory Document November 2020 CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Using Theory of Change to Design and Evaluate Public Health Interventions: a Systematic Review Erica Breuer1*, Lucy Lee2, Mary De Silva2 and Crick Lund1
    Breuer et al. Implementation Science (2016) 11:63 DOI 10.1186/s13012-016-0422-6 SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Open Access Using theory of change to design and evaluate public health interventions: a systematic review Erica Breuer1*, Lucy Lee2, Mary De Silva2 and Crick Lund1 Abstract Background: Despite the increasing popularity of the theory of change (ToC) approach, little is known about the extent to which ToC has been used in the design and evaluation of public health interventions. This review aims to determine how ToCs have been developed and used in the development and evaluation of public health interventions globally. Methods: We searched for papers reporting the use of “theory of change” in the development or evaluation of public health interventions in databases of peer-reviewed journal articles such as Scopus, Pubmed, PsychInfo, grey literature databases, Google and websites of development funders. We included papers of any date, language or study design. Both abstracts and full text papers were double screened. Data were extracted and narratively and quantitatively summarised. Results: A total of 62 papers were included in the review. Forty-nine (79 %) described the development of ToC, 18 (29 %) described the use of ToC in the development of the intervention and 49 (79 %) described the use of ToC in the evaluation of the intervention. Although a large number of papers were included in the review, their descriptions of the ToC development and use in intervention design and evaluation lacked detail. Conclusions: The use of the ToC approach is widespread in the public health literature. Clear reporting of the ToC process and outputs is important to strengthen the body of literature on practical application of ToC in order to develop our understanding of the benefits and advantages of using ToC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Communities That Care Coalition Model for Improving Community Health Through Clinical– Community Partnerships: a Population Health Case Report
    Discussion Paper The Communities That Care Coalition Model for Improving Community Health through Clinical– Community Partnerships: A Population Health Case Report Jeanette Voas, Katherine Allen, and Ruth Potee May 6, 2016 The Communities That Care Coalition Model for Improving Community Health through Clinical–Community Partnerships: A Population Health Case Study Jeanette Voas and Katherine Allen of Partnership for Youth Ruth Potee of Valley Medical Group BACKGROUND In rural western Massachusetts, a coalition with members from many sectors of the community has been working for more than a decade to support youth well-being and reduce youth substance abuse. In that time, youth drinking, cigarette smoking, and marijuana use have declined substantially, as have targeted risk factors underlying problem behaviors. The Communities That Care Coalition serves a region encompassing 30 townships in Franklin County and the North Quabbin region, with a population of 87,000 distributed over 894 square miles. The region is economically depressed, with median household income 20 percent lower than the state median. The four largest towns (Greenfield, Athol, Montague, and Orange) are all low-income centers (median income 28, 30, 32, and 33 percent below the state level respectively), with many urban-style problems despite the rural surroundings (U.S. Census Bureau, 2010, 2013). In 2002, representatives from the local hospital (Baystate Franklin Medical Center), local government, schools, social services, law enforcement, business, and faith-based organizations
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Barack Obama, 2014 Remarks at Michigan State
    Administration of Barack Obama, 2014 Remarks at Michigan State University in East Lansing, Michigan February 7, 2014 The President. Hello, Spartans! Go Green! Audience members. Go White! The President. [Laughter] Oh, thank you so much. Everybody, have a seat here. The—it's good to be at Michigan State. Thank you, Ben, for that wonderful introduction. Give Ben a big round of applause. He's got his beautiful family right here. How did Dad do? Was he pretty good? Where—yes, there he is. He did good? I thought he did great. It is good to be in East Lansing. It's good to be with all of you here today. I'm here because I've heard about all the great things that you're doing. And I want to thank Mayor Triplett and President Simon for hosting us. I am also here to do some scouting on my brackets. [Laughter] I just talked to Coach Izzo; Spartans are looking pretty good. I know things were a little wild for a while, had some injuries. But the truth is that Coach Izzo, he always paces so that you peak right at the tournament. [Applause] That's a fact. Then I got a chance to meet Mark Dantonio. All right. So you've already got a Rose Bowl victory. You guys are—you're greedy. [Laughter] You want to win everything. But it's wonderful to be here. I love coming to Michigan. Mainly, I love coming to Michigan because of the people. But I also love coming here because there are few places in the country that better symbolize what we've been through together over these last 4, 5 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Ids Working Paper
    IDS WORKING PAPER Volume 2017 No 499 Theories of Change for Promoting Empowerment and Accountability in Fragile and Conflict-Affected Settings Duncan Green October 2017 This paper is published in association with the Action for Empowerment and Accountability Research Programme (A4EA). Action for Empowerment and Accountability Research Programme In a world shaped by rapid change, the Action for Empowerment and Accountability Research programme focuses on fragile, conflict and violence affected settings to ask how social and political action for empowerment and accountability emerges in these contexts, what pathways it takes, and what impacts it has. A4EA is implemented by a consortium consisting of: the Institute of Development Studies (IDS), the Accountability Research Center (ARC), the Collective for Social Science Research (CSSR), the Institute of Development and Economic Alternatives (IDEAS), Itad, Oxfam GB, and the Partnership for African Social and Governance Research (PASGR). Research focuses on five countries: Egypt, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nigeria, and Pakistan. A4EA is funded by UK aid from the UK government. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the official policies of our funder. Theories of Change for Promoting Empowerment and Accountability in Fragile and Conflict-Affected Settings Duncan Green IDS Working Paper 499 © Institute of Development Studies 2017 ISSN: 2040-0209 ISBN: 978-1-78118-405-9 A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library. This is an Open Access paper distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International licence, which permits downloading and sharing provided the original authors and source are credited – but the work is not used for commercial purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2000CTC Book-V=Zerox
    COMMUNITIES THAT CARE COMMUNITIES THAT CARE INFORMATION PACKET Developmental Research and Programs, Inc. Seattle, Washington © 2000, 2001 DEVELOPMENTAL RESEARCH AND PROGRAMS, INC. PAGE 1 COMMUNITIES THAT CARE What is the Communities That Care operating system? The Communities That Care® (CTC) operating system provides research-based tools to help communities promote the positive development of children and youth and prevent adolescent prob- lem behaviors that get in the way of positive development, includ- ing substance abuse, delinquency, teen pregnancy, school dropout and violence. CTC is • Inclusive–engaging all areas of the community in promoting healthy development. • Proactive–identifying and addressing priority areas before young people become involved in problem behaviors by targeting early predictors of problems rather than waiting until problems have become entrenched in young people’s lives. • Based on over 30 years of rigorous research from a variety of fields-sociology, psychology, education, public health, criminol- ogy, medicine, and organizational development. • Community-specific–rather than a “cookie cutter” approach. Each community or neighborhood uses it’s own data-based profile to craft a comprehensive long-range plan for strengthen- ing existing resources and filling identified gaps with tested, effective programs, policies and practices. How can CTC promote the healthy development of children and youth? The Communities That Care operating system helps communities • Engage all members of the community who have a
    [Show full text]
  • Theory of Change
    THEORY OF CHANGE UNDAF CAMPANION GUIDANCE 1 ! UNDAF COMPANION GUIDANCE: THEORY OF CHANGE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 3 ................................................................................................................................. 2. THE CONCEPT 4 What is a theory of change? ............................................................................................................................. 4 Purpose: Why use a theory of change? .............................................................................................................. 4 Methodology: How to develop a theory of change? .............................................................................................. 4 Key principles for developing a theory of change ................................................................................................ 5 Key steps for developing a theory of change ...................................................................................................... 5 3. MOVING FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE ................................................................................. 6 Step 1: Focus ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Step 2: Change analysis .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Chicago School of Sociology
    Sociology 915 Professor Mustafa Emirbayer Spring Semester 2011 O f fice: 8141 Sewell Social Science Thursdays 5-8 PM Office Telephone: 262-4419 Classroom: 4314 Sewell Social Science Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Thursdays 12-1 PM http://ssc.wisc.edu/~emirbaye/ The Chicago School of Sociology Overview of the Course: This course will encompass every aspect of the Chicago School: its philosophic origins, historical development, theoretical innovations, use of ethnographic and other methods, and contributions to such areas as urban studies, social psychology, race relations, social organization and disorganization, ecology, and marginality. Chronologically, it will cover both the original Chicago School (interwar years) and the Second Chicago School (early postwar period). Readings: Because of the open-endedness of the syllabus, no books will be on order at the bookstore. Students are expected to procure their own copies of books they wish to own. A number of books (dozens) will be on reserve at the Social Science Reference Library (8th floor of Sewell Social Science Building). In addition, many selections will be available as pdf files at Learn@UW. For future reference, this syllabus will also be available at Learn@UW. Grading Format: Students’ grades for this course will be based on two different requirements, each of which will contribute 50% to the final grade. First, students will be evaluated on a final paper. Second, they will be graded on their class attendance and participation. More on each of these below. Final Paper: One week after the final class meeting of the semester (at 5 p.m. that day), a final paper will be due.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Format to Brian [email protected]
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 111 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 156 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, APRIL 28, 2010 No. 61 House of Representatives The House met at 10 a.m. and was PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs and oth- called to order by the Speaker pro tem- The SPEAKER pro tempore. Will the ers reaped millions of dollars in bo- pore (Mr. ISRAEL). gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. nuses even as the economy was crash- ing. These synthetic CDOs were syn- f COBLE) come forward and lead the House in the Pledge of Allegiance. thetic garbage. DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER Mr. COBLE led the Pledge of Alle- Unscrupulous individuals on Wall Street PRO TEMPORE giance as follows: worsened the financial crisis by creating gar- The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the bage, selling it and betting against it. Oh, they United States of America, and to the Repub- drove away with a garbage truck full of cash. fore the House the following commu- lic for which it stands, one nation under God, nication from the Speaker: Let’s ban the creation and sale of them, and indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. prevent this from ever happening again. WASHINGTON, DC, f April 28, 2010. f I hereby appoint the Honorable STEVE ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER ISRAEL to act as Speaker pro tempore on this PRO TEMPORE AMERICANS ABROAD FACE day. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The BANKING ROADBLOCKS NANCY PELOSI, Speaker of the House of Representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Essays
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Essays in American Political Behavior A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Robert Bond Committee in charge: Professor James Fowler, Chair Professor Charles Elkan Professor David Huber Professor Thad Kousser Professor Gary Jacobson 2013 Copyright Robert Bond, 2013 All rights reserved. The dissertation of Robert Bond is approved, and it is accept- able in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2013 iii DEDICATION My grandparents – Harry Bycroft, Betty Bycroft, Ronald Bond, and Lucy Stockton – did not live to see the completion of this dissertation. It is dedicated to their lives and their memory. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page . iii Dedication . iv Table of Contents . v List of Figures . vii List of Tables . x Acknowledgements . xii Vita and Publications . xiii Abstract of the Dissertation . xiv Chapter 1 Social Information and Participation . 1 1.1 Introduction . 2 1.2 Social norms and voting behavior . 4 1.3 Experimental Process and Results . 6 1.4 Discussion . 18 Chapter 2 The Dynamic Spread of Voting . 21 2.1 Introduction . 22 2.2 Peer effects and voting . 23 2.3 Data and methods . 24 2.4 Matching . 26 2.5 Calculation of Treatment Effect . 28 2.6 Results . 28 2.7 Discussion . 32 2.8 Conclusion . 33 Chapter 3 Estimating Ideology using Facebook’s ‘Like’ Data . 36 3.1 Introduction . 37 3.2 Facebook ‘Like’ Data . 39 3.3 Using Facebook data to scale ideological positions . 42 3.3.1 Model of liking .
    [Show full text]
  • Methodological Brief No.2: Theory of Change
    Methodological Briefs Impact Evaluation No. 2 Theory of Change Patricia Rogers UNICEF OFFICE OF RESEARCH The Office of Research is UNICEF’s dedicated research arm. Its prime objectives are to improve international understanding of issues relating to children’s rights and to help facilitate full implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child across the world. The Office of Research aims to set out a comprehensive framework for research and knowledge within the organization, in support of UNICEF’s global programmes and policies, and works with partners to make policies for children evidence-based. Publications produced by the Office are contributions to a global debate on children and child rights issues and include a wide range of opinions. The views expressed are those of the authors and/or editors and are published in order to stimulate further dialogue on impact evaluation methods. They do not necessarily reflect the policies or views of UNICEF. OFFICE OF RESEARCH METHODOLOGICAL BRIEFS UNICEF Office of Research Methodological Briefs are intended to share contemporary research practice, methods, designs, and recommendations from renowned researchers and evaluators. The primary audience is UNICEF staff who conduct, commission or interpret research and evaluation findings to make decisions about programming, policy and advocacy. This brief has undergone an internal peer review. The text has not been edited to official publication standards and UNICEF accepts no responsibility for errors. Extracts from this publication may be freely reproduced with due acknowledgement. Requests to utilize larger portions or the full publication should be addressed to the Communication Unit at [email protected] To consult and download the Methodological Briefs, please visit http://www.unicef-irc.org/KM/IE/ For readers wishing to cite this document we suggest the following form: Rogers, P.
    [Show full text]