Cognitive Dissonance Cognitive Dissonance in Construction Bookkeepers Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cognitive Dissonance Cognitive Dissonance in Construction Bookkeepers Contents Cognitive Dissonance Cognitive Dissonance In Construction Bookkeepers Contents 1 Cognitive dissonance 1 1.1 Relationship between cognitions ..................................... 1 1.1.1 Magnitude of dissonance ..................................... 1 1.2 Reducing ................................................. 1 1.3 Theory and research ........................................... 2 1.3.1 Belief disconfirmation paradigm ................................. 2 1.3.2 Induced-compliance paradigm .................................. 2 1.3.3 Free-choice paradigm ...................................... 3 1.3.4 Effort justification paradigm ................................... 3 1.4 Examples ................................................. 4 1.4.1 “The Fox and the Grapes” .................................... 4 1.4.2 Other related phenomena ..................................... 4 1.5 Applications of research ......................................... 5 1.5.1 Education ............................................. 5 1.5.2 Therapy .............................................. 5 1.5.3 Promoting healthy and pro-social behavior ............................ 5 1.5.4 Consumer behavior ........................................ 5 1.5.5 Social engineering ........................................ 6 1.6 Challenges and alternative theories .................................... 6 1.6.1 Self-perception theory (Bem) .................................. 6 1.6.2 Balance theory (“P-O-X” Theory) (Heider) ........................... 7 1.6.3 Cost-benefit analysis (Dupuit) .................................. 7 1.6.4 Self-discrepancy theory (Higgins) ................................ 7 1.6.5 Averse consequences vs. inconsistency (Cooper & Fazio) .................... 8 1.6.6 Free-choice paradigm criticism (Chen et al.) ........................... 8 1.6.7 Action and/or motivation based model (Harmon-Jones) ..................... 8 1.7 Neuroscience findings ........................................... 8 1.8 Modeling in neural networks ....................................... 9 1.9 See also .................................................. 9 i ii CONTENTS 1.10 References ................................................ 10 1.11 Further reading .............................................. 13 1.12 External links ............................................... 13 2 Motivation 14 2.1 Types of theories and models ....................................... 14 2.2 Psychological theories ........................................... 14 2.2.1 Rational motivations ....................................... 14 2.2.2 Incentive theories: intrinsic and extrinsic motivation ....................... 14 2.2.3 Behaviorist theories ....................................... 15 2.2.4 Push and pull ........................................... 17 2.2.5 Self-control ............................................ 18 2.2.6 Drives ............................................... 18 2.2.7 Drive-reduction theory ...................................... 18 2.2.8 Cognitive dissonance theory ................................... 18 2.2.9 Content theories .......................................... 19 2.2.10 Temporal motivation theory .................................... 20 2.2.11 Achievement motivation ..................................... 20 2.2.12 Cognitive theories ......................................... 21 2.2.13 Models of behavior change .................................... 22 2.2.14 Thematic Apperception Test ................................... 22 2.2.15 Intrinsic motivation and the 16 basic desires theory ........................ 22 2.2.16 Attribution theory ......................................... 22 2.2.17 Approach versus avoidance .................................... 23 2.3 Practical applications ........................................... 23 2.3.1 Employee motivation ....................................... 23 2.3.2 Drugs Use and Abuse ....................................... 24 2.3.3 Education ............................................. 24 2.3.4 Business .............................................. 26 2.3.5 Games ............................................... 27 2.4 See also .................................................. 28 2.5 References ................................................. 28 2.6 Further reading .............................................. 32 2.7 External links ............................................... 33 3 Effort justification 34 3.1 Theory and research ............................................ 34 3.2 Implications ................................................ 34 3.3 Competing views ............................................. 34 CONTENTS iii 3.4 References ................................................. 35 3.5 Text and image sources, contributors, and licenses ............................ 36 3.5.1 Text ................................................ 36 3.5.2 Images .............................................. 37 3.5.3 Content license .......................................... 38 Chapter 1 Cognitive dissonance In psychology, cognitive dissonance is the mental stress 1. The importance of cognitions: The more the elements or discomfort experienced by an individual who holds two are personally valued, the greater the magnitude of the or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values at the same dissonant relationship. time; performs an action that is contradictory to one or more beliefs, ideas, or values; or is confronted by new information 2. Ratio of cognitions: The proportion of dissonant to that conflicts with existing beliefs, ideas, or values.[1][2] consonant elements Leon Festinger's theory of cognitive dissonance focuses on The pressure to reduce cognitive dissonance is a function of how humans strive for internal consistency. An individual the magnitude of this dissonance.[1] who experiences inconsistency (dissonance) tends to be- come psychologically uncomfortable, and is motivated to try to reduce this dissonance—as well as actively avoid sit- uations and information likely to increase it.[1] 1.2 Reducing Cognitive dissonance theory is founded on the assumption 1.1 Relationship between cognitions that individuals seek consistency between their expectations and their reality. Because of this, people engage in a pro- cess called “dissonance reduction” to bring their cognitions Individuals can adjust their attitudes or actions in vari- and actions in line with one another. This creation of uni- ous ways. Adjustments result in one of three relation- formity allows for a lessening of psychological tension and ships between two cognitions or between a cognition and distress. According to Festinger, dissonance reduction can a behavior.[1] be achieved in four ways.[1] In an example case where a per- son has adopted the attitude that they will no longer eat high Consonant relationship Two cognitions/actions that are fat food, but eats a high-fat doughnut, the four methods of consistent with one another (e.g., not wanting to get reduction are: intoxicated while out, then ordering water instead of alcohol) 1. Change behavior or cognition (“I will not eat any more Irrelevant relationship Two cognitions/actions that are of this doughnut”) unrelated to one another (e.g., not wanting to get in- toxicated while out, then tying your shoes) 2. Justify behavior or cognition by changing the conflict- ing cognition (“I'm allowed to cheat every once in a Dissonant relationship Two cognitions/actions that are while”) inconsistent with one another (e.g., not wanting to get intoxicated while out, then consuming a large quantity 3. Justify behavior or cognition by adding new cognitions of alcohol) (“I'll spend 30 extra minutes at the gym to work this off”) 1.1.1 Magnitude of dissonance 4. Ignore or deny any information that conflicts with ex- isting beliefs (“This doughnut is not high in fat”) The amount of dissonance produced by two conflicting cog- nitions or actions (as well as the subsequent psychological Categorization is used by humans to simplify the world distress) depends on two factors: around them. How categorization happens is usually what 1 2 CHAPTER 1. COGNITIVE DISSONANCE is the most noticeable or basic categories; race, gender, and be resurrected from the dead.[7] Some have suggested the age. Once these groups are identified, a set of attributes same process might explain the belief two thousand years (emotions/attitudes) towards that group come into mind as ago that Jesus was resurrected from the dead.[8] well. These attributes are prejudices (whether positive or negative) and are expectations held over individuals who might not identify with the labeled group.[3] 1.3.2 Induced-compliance paradigm 1.3 Theory and research See also: Forced compliance theory In Festinger and Carlsmith's classic 1959 experiment, stu- Most of the research on cognitive dissonance takes the form dents were asked to spend an hour on boring and tedious of one of four major paradigms. Important research gen- tasks (e.g., turning pegs a quarter turn, over and over again). erated by the theory has been concerned with the conse- The tasks were designed to generate a strong, negative at- quences of exposure to information inconsistent with a prior titude. Once the subjects had done this, the experimenters belief, what happens after individuals act in ways that are asked some of them to do a simple favour. They were asked inconsistent with their prior attitudes, what happens after to talk to another subject (actually an actor) and persuade individuals make decisions, and the effects of effort ex- the impostor that
Recommended publications
  • Disorders of Volition Are Characterized by an Impairment Related to the Implementation of Decisions
    1 Toward a Science of Volition Wolfgang Prinz, Daniel Dennett, and Natalie Sebanz This book aims at improving our understanding of the processes supporting volun- tary action by looking at conditions in which the will is impaired or even breaks down. We use this introductory chapter to prepare the ground for contributions by philoso- phers, psychologists, neuroscientists, and psychiatrists that tackle the experience of acting intentionally, the ability to make decisions and implement one’s goals, and the many ways in which the experience and the exertion of willful behavior can be dis- turbed. In the first part of this introduction, we describe the status of the will as we see it in present and past thinking. In the second part of the chapter, we provide an overview of the contributions in this book. 1.1 Studying the Will When trying to decipher the forbidding complexity of the mind/brain, the standard simplifying assumption is that it is an “input–output system” in which perception goes in and (control of) action eventually comes out. We experimenters then work from the outside in, first getting control and understanding of the peripheral input systems, and postponing difficult questions about the center, which is shrouded in fog and mystery. This makes sense but risks distorting our vision of the whole, since we seldom if ever find ways of even posing questions about the requirements for the more central components that must eventually get transformed into the highest levels of outbound or “inside-out” traffic. This potential for distortion is exacerbated by two further sources of distraction: introspection and the demands of free will.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dissertation Entitled Exploring Common Antecedents of Three Related Decision Biases by Jonathan E. Westfall Submitted As Parti
    A Dissertation Entitled Exploring Common Antecedents of Three Related Decision Biases by Jonathan E. Westfall Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology __________________________ Advisor: Dr. J. D. Jasper __________________________ Dr. S. D. Christman __________________________ Dr. R. E. Heffner __________________________ Dr. K. L. London __________________________ Dr. M. E. Doherty __________________________ Graduate School The University of Toledo August 2009 Exploring Common Antecedents ii Copyright © 2009 – Jonathan E. Westfall This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced in any manner without the expressed written permission of the author. Exploring Common Antecedents iii An Abstract of Exploring Common Antecedents of Three Related Decision Biases Jonathan E. Westfall Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for The Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology The University of Toledo August 2009 “Decision making inertia” is a term loosely used to describe the similar nature of a variety of decision making biases that predominantly favor a decision to maintain one course of action over switching to a new course. Three of these biases, the sunk cost effect, status-quo bias, and inaction inertia are discussed here. Combining earlier work on strength of handedness and the sunk cost effect along with new findings regarding counterfactual thought, this work principally seeks to determine if counterfactual thought may drive the three decision biases of note while also analyzing common relationships between the biases, strength of handedness, and the variables of regret and loss aversion. Over a series of experiments, it was found that handedness differences did exist in the three biases discussed, that amount and type of counterfactuals generated did not predict choice within the status-quo bias, and that the remaining variables potentially thought to drive the biases presented did not link causally to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Bsc Chemistry
    ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Subject COMMERCE Paper No and 1: Management concept and organisational behaviour Title Module No and 19: Content Theories of Motivation Title Module Tag COM_P1_M19 COMMERCE PAPER 1: Management concept and organisational behaviour MODULE No. : 19: Content Theories of Motivation ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Learning Outcomes 2. Introduction 3. Concept of Motivation 4. Theories of Motivation 4.1 Content theory of motivation 4.2 Process theory of motivation 4.3 Basic Difference between Content theories and Process Theories 5. Content theories 5.1Abraham Maslow’s Need Hierarchy theory: based on needs 5.2Clayton Alderfer’s ERG theory: based on needs 5.3 McClellands learned need theory: based on needs 5.4 Fredrick Herzberg’s two factor theory: based on factors 5.5 Douglas McGregor’s Theory X and theory Y: based on personality 5.6 Comparison between different content theories 6. Summary COMMERCE PAPER 1: Management concept and organisational behaviour MODULE No. : 19: Content Theories of Motivation ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. Learning Outcomes After studying this module, we shall be able to Define the content theories of motivation Learn about different content theories of motivation. Apply the understanding of different motivation theories to enhance the contribution of the
    [Show full text]
  • Does Musical Behavior Promote Affiliation?
    DOES MUSICAL BEHAVIOR PROMOTE AFFILIATION? A Dissertation by CINDY KAY HARMON-JONES Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2011 Major Subject: Psychology Does Musical Behavior Promote Affiliation? Copyright 2011 Cindy Kay Harmon-Jones DOES MUSICAL BEHAVIOR PROMOTE AFFILIATION? A Dissertation by CINDY KAY HARMON-JONES Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Co-Chairs of Committee, Brandon Schmeichel Gerianne Alexander Committee Members, Aaron Taylor Jeffrey Winking Head of Department, Ludy T. Benjamin August 2011 Major Subject: Psychology iii ABSTRACT Does Musical Behavior Promote Affiliation? (August 2011) Cindy Kay Harmon-Jones, B.S., Excelsior College; M.S., Texas A&M University Co-Chairs of Advisory Committee: Dr. Brandon Schmeichel Dr. Gerianne Alexander Past research suggested that greater rhythmic complexity in musical behavior increases affiliation in small groups. The current research tested the hypothesis that musical behavior including melody would promote affiliation. In the current experiment, a video showed models either singing nonsense syllables in unison or speaking identical syllables in synchrony. Participants were assigned to either imitate, or merely listen to, the videos. Participants perceived both the synchronous speaking condition and singing conditions as musical behavior. In the imitate conditions, synchronous speaking produced more affiliation and ingroup favoritism and less embarrassment than singing, whereas in the listen-only conditions, affiliation, ingroup favoritism, and embarrassment did not differ between singing and speaking.
    [Show full text]
  • Motivation Is the Driving Force by Which Humans Achieve Their Goals
    Definition: Motivation is defined as the process that initiates, guides and maintains goal-oriented behaviors. Motivation is what causes us to act, whether it is getting a glass of water to reduce thirst or reading a book to gain knowledge. It involves the biological, emotional, social and cognitive forces that activate behavior. In everyday usage, the term motivation is frequently used to describe why a person does something. For example, you might say that a student is so motivated to get into a clinical psychology program that she spends every night studying. Components of Motivation There are three major components to motivation: activation, persistence and intensity. Activation involves the decision to initiate a behavior, such as enrolling in a psychology class. Persistence is the continued effort toward a goal even though obstacles may exist, such as taking more psychology courses in order to earn a degree although it requires a significant investment of time, energy and resources. Finally, intensity can be seen in the concentration and vigor that goes into pursuing a goal. For example, one student might coast by without much effort, while another student will study regularly, participate in discussions and take advantage of research opportunities outside of class. Extrinsic Vs. Intrinsic Motivation Different types of motivation are frequently described as being either extrinsic or intrinsic. Extrinsic motivations are those that arise from outside of the individual and often involve rewards such as trophies, money, social recognition or praise. Intrinsic motivations are those that arise from within the individual, such as doing a complicated cross-word puzzle purely for the personal gratification of solving a problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Dissonance Theory Has Been Reformulated by Some Authors Since the Original Statement (Festinger, 1957) Ap- Peared in T
    Japanese Psychological Research 1980, Vol.22, No.1, 32-41 ATTRIBUTION OF PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND DISSONANCE REDUCTION HARUKI SAKAI AND KIYOSHI ANDOW 1 University of Tokyo The relationship between personal responsibility and dissonance reduction was investigated in a situation where an individual had to undergo a negative consequence caused by an agent beyond his control, i.e., by chance. Eighty participants received either strong or weak electric shock, depending on the oddness or evenness of spots of a die thrown either by the experimenter (Ex- perimenter-Caused condition) or by the participant himself (Participant- Caused condition). It was found that participants in the Participant-Caused condition evaluated electric shocks less painful, estimated their heart rates to be less faster, and perceived the experimenter more intelligent and favorable than participants in the Experimenter-Caused condition. These results were interpreted as lending support to the newly reformulated dissonance theory. Cognitive dissonance theory has been tion may be observed only to the degree reformulated by some authors since the that the individual sees himself as re- original statement (Festinger, 1957) ap- sponsible for bringing cognitions into an peared in the late 1950s. Brehm and inconsistent relationship (p. 10). Cohen (1962) stated that dissonance was These reformulations cited above clearly aroused only when an individual was concerned with the necessary conditions bound by a behavioral commitment to for dissonance arousal, and it may be said, one of the inconsistent cognitions. Aron- as Greenwald and Ronis (1978) pointed son (1968) stressed that the self concept or out, that dissonance theory has evolved some other firmly held expectancy must along a direction of convergence with be involved for dissonance to be aroused ideas from the tradition of self theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Hierarchy of Needs – Abraham Maslow; 1943 (Content Theory)
    Hierarchy of Needs – Abraham Maslow; 1943 (Content Theory) What is the Theory? Maslow’s hierarchy of needs is a theory in psychology proposed by the American psychologist Abraham Maslow in his 1943 paper “A Theory of Human Motivation”. Maslow developed a theory that suggests we are motivated to satisfy five basic needs. These needs are arranged in a hierarchy. Maslow suggests that we seek first to satisfy the lowest level of needs. Once this is done, we seek to satisfy each higher level of need until we have satisfied all five needs. While modern research shows some shortcomings with this theory, Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Theory remains an important and simple motivation tool for managers to understand and apply. The Hierarchy of Needs is as follows: 1. Physiological Needs (basic issues of survival such as salary, stable employment, able to eat/drink/sleep well) 2. Security Needs (stable physical and emotional environment issues such as benefits, pension, safe work environment, and fair work practices; job security) 3. “Belongingness” Needs (social acceptance issues such as friendship or cooperation on the job; feeling part of a group/team) 4. Esteem Needs (positive self-image and respect and recognition issues such as job titles, nice work spaces, and prestigious job assignments; being recognised for achievements/improvements) 5. Self-Actualization Needs (achievement issues such as workplace autonomy, challenging work, and subject matter expert status on the job, the need for personal growth and development) Extracts taken from https://managementisajourney.com/motivation-applying-maslows-hierarchy-of-needs-theory/ 1 Hierarchy of Needs – Abraham Maslow; 1943 (Content Theory) How to Apply this Theory to the Workplace 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Work Volition from Proactive Personality Trait Among University Students Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Proaktif Kişil
    Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu University Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi Kastamonu Education Journal Ocak 2018 Cilt:26 Sayı:1 January 2018 Volume:26 Issue:1 Kastamonu - TÜRKİYE Kastamonu - TURKEY Predicting Work Volition From Proactive Personality Trait Among University Students Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Proaktif Kişiliklerinin Çalışma İradesi Algısındaki Yordayıcı Rolü Hilal BÜYÜKGÖZEa aHacettepe Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye. Özet Abstract Bu araştırmada, üniversite öğrencilerinin çalışma iradesi düzeylerinin The current study aimed to elaborate on how work volition of university proaktif kişilik özellikleri ile ilişkisi ve proaktif kişiliğin çalışma iradesindeki students associated with proactive personality trait, and to what extent açıklama gücü belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Katılımcılar, 242’si kadın ve 110’u proactive personality predicted work volition. Participants consisted of erkek olmak üzere 352 üniversite öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. Bulgular, erkek 352 university students including 242 females and 110 males. Findings katılımcıların kadınlara göre daha yüksek çalışma iradesine sahip olduğunu demonstrated that male university students had stronger work volition göstermiştir. Katılımcıların çalışma iradesi ve proaktif kişilik özelliği ile orta perceptions than female students. Further, a positive, moderate level düzeyde ve aynı yönlü bir ilişki olduğu belirlenirken, kariyer engeli algısı relationship between work volition and proactive personality was explored, ile proaktif kişilik arasında
    [Show full text]
  • On Consciousness As a Sense a Communication of the Intractable Studies Institute Patrick M
    Theoretical. On Consciousness as a Sense A Communication of the Intractable Studies Institute Patrick M. Rael, Director, IntractableStudiesInstitute.org SM SM Definitions of Consciousness Conclusion Consciousness has several conflicting definitions. The definition we will solve This can be generalized: In the mind, a sensory neuron fires and a sensation here includes: def - The state of being characterized by sensation, emotion, occurs, whether color, taste, smell, etc. There is nothing that would rule out a volition, thought, and awareness of something within oneself. special sensor that when fired produces the sense of consciousness! This is distinguished from other senses as it’s source is internal, not external. The logical function could be sense of: Analysis Consciousness = OR(Thought,Emotion,Volition,Introspection) From the Communication “Pretty Good Sentience” we see that sensor input of C = OR(TEVI) red, green and blue light into the eye are 1) detected, and equally or more importantly are 2) sensed as a color. These are the 3 primary colors the human eye can sense. Additionally the human eye can sense night vision brightness, which mostly lacks colors, it’s more black and white brightness. It is seemingly impossible to present externally what a persons sensation of a color like red is, Source Destination Sense except to compare to other things that match redness. Everyone, except for color-blind people, agrees the crayon labeled red is red, so people can communicate sensed colors to each other. But nobody knows if a persons Photon → eye cone Neuron(s) Primary color R,G,B sensation of redness is actually the same as another persons.
    [Show full text]
  • Spontaneous Hypnosis in the Ÿ Or En Sic Context
    Spontaneous Hypnosis in the ÿ or en sic Context John 0.Beahrs, MD "Hypnosis" denotes either specific phenomena (altered volition, perception, cog- nition, and recall) or interpersonal transactions that often elicit them. Basic research leads to paradox: hypnosis is validated, and shown to be dissociative in essence, at the same time that neither its phenomena nor transactions can be separated from those of everyday living without logical absurdity. This paradox can be resolved by assuming that consciousness and volition are complex, occurring simultaneously at many levels in the same waking individual. Hypnotic-like phenomena and transac- tions occur spontaneously, in either covert or overt forms. The former are pervasive, whereas the latter are often associated with psychological trauma. Forensic impli- cations are twofold: for criminal responsibility, and the reliability of eyewitness testimony. Hypnotic-like states and transactions are rarely affirmed as an insanity defense because at some level these subjects are aware of what they are doing and why. Diminished capacity and mitigation of sentence are more appropriate defense strategies. Several conflicted traditions of case law have evolved to protect eyewitness testimony from hypnotic-like distortions in cognition, perception, and memory that can occur either during or outside of formal hypnotic procedures. These include the admissibility of posthypnotic testimony, due process safeguards at eyewitness identification procedures, and the admissibility of expert testimony on the findings of eyewitness research. These areas are inseparable from one another and demand a systematic coordinated approach. The word "hypnosis" is used to denote nomena include a shift toward either certain unexplained phenomena, subjective nonvolition (a hand "just interpersonal transactions that often lifts"), altered perception that can in- elicit them, or a formal ritualistic pro- clude positive and negative hallucina- cedure.
    [Show full text]
  • Boswell Et Al., 2010
    Running head: SCHOOLS OF PSYCHOTHERAPY 1 Schools of Psychotherapy and the Beginnings of a Scientific Approach James F. Boswell, Brian A. Sharpless, Leslie S. Greenberg, Laurie Heatherington, Jonathan D. Huppert, Jacques P. Barber, Marvin R. Goldfried, and Louis G. Castonguay Running head: SCHOOLS OF PSYCHOTHERAPY 2 Abstract The theoretical, clinical, and empirical foundations of psychotherapy come from five primary movements that still exist today, continue to evolve, and remain scientifically productive: psychodynamic, cognitive-behavioral, humanistic, systemic, and integrative. The goal of this chapter is to examine the philosophical, clinical, and scientific underpinnings of each of these major traditions in detail. Experts in these five approaches will describe: (a) the model of psychopathology (especially focusing upon etiological and maintenance factors emphasized in assessment and case formulation); (b) the focus and specific techniques used in treatment planning and implementation; (c) the hypothesized therapeutic mechanisms of change; and (d) the outcome literature/empirical support for each modality. We conclude with a look toward the future of the science of psychotherapy and the scientist-practitioner model of psychotherapy. Keywords : psychotherapy, psychodynamic therapy, cognitive-behavior therapy, humanistic therapy, systemic therapy, integrative therapy Running head: SCHOOLS OF PSYCHOTHERAPY 3 Schools of Psychotherapy and the Beginnings of a Scientific Approach If defined as a “talking cure,” psychotherapy has a very long
    [Show full text]
  • Teachers Job Satisfaction and Motivation for School Effectiveness: an Assessment
    Teachers Job Satisfaction and Motivation for School Effectiveness: An Assessment Nwachukwu Prince Ololube University of Helsinki Finland. Abstract Significantly, job satisfaction and motivation are very essential to the continuing growth of educational systems around the world and they rank alongside professional knowledge and skills, center competencies, educational resources as well as strategies, in genuinely determining educational success and performance. This study assessed the differences and relationship between the level of teachers’ job satisfaction, motivation and their teaching performance in Rivers State of Nigeria. A questionnaire titled ‘TEJOSAMOQ’ was used to collect data for the study. While the data for the study was analyzed using multiple statistical procedures: mean point value, standard deviation, and variance, t-test of significance and One-way-analysis of variance (ANOVA). The survey results revealed that teacher related sources of job satisfaction seem to have a greater impact on teaching performance, as teachers are also dissatisfied with the educational policies and administration, pay and fringe benefits, material rewards and advancement. Background to the Study The relevance of job satisfaction and motivation are very crucial to the long-term growth of any educational system around the world. They probably rank alongside professional knowledge and skills, center competencies, educational resources and strategies as the veritable determinants of educational success and performance. Professional knowledge, skills and center competencies occur when one feels effective in one’s behavior. In other words, professional knowledge, skills and competencies can be seen when one is taking on and mastering challenging tasks directed at educational success and performance (Filak & Sheldon, 2003). The above factors are closely similar to efficacy, and, of course, it is well known that many teachers lose or fail to develop self-efficacy within educational settings (Dweck, 1999).
    [Show full text]