DOCSLIB.ORG

Goodwin Sands Aggregate Dredging Environmental Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Goodwin Sands Aggregate Dredging Environmental Statement REPORT Goodwin Sands Aggregate Dredging Environmental Statement Volume I - Non-Technical Summary Client: Dover Harbour Board Reference: I&BPB2107R001D01 Revision: 01/Final Date: 16 May 2016 O p e n HASKONINGDHV UK LTD. 2 Abbey Gardens Great College Street London SW1P 3NL Industry & Buildings VAT registration number: 792428892 +44 207 2222115 T [email protected] E royalhaskoningdhv.com W Document title: Goodwin Sands Aggregate Dredging Environmental Statement Document short title: Reference: I&BPB2107R001D01 Revision: 01/Final Date: 16 May 2016 Project name: Goodwin Sands Aggregate Dredging Project number: PB2107 Author(s): Jack Douglas, Caroline Price Drafted by: Jack Douglas, Caroline Price Checked by: Steve Challinor Date / initials: SC 16/05/2016 Approved by: Nicola Clay Date / initials: NC 16/05/2016 Classification Open Disclaimer No part of these specifications/printed matter may be reproduced and/or published by print, photocopy, microfilm or by any other means, without the prior written permission of HaskoningDHV UK Ltd.; nor may they be used, without such permission, for any purposes other than that for which they were produced. HaskoningDHV UK Ltd. accepts no responsibility or liability for these specifications/printed matter to any party other than the persons by whom it was commissioned and as concluded under that Appointment. The quality management system of HaskoningDHV UK Ltd. has been certified in accordance with ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001. 16 May 2016 I&BPB2107R001D01 i O p e n Table of Contents Non- Technical Summary 1 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of this NTS 1 1.2 The Proposed Dredging Scheme 1 1.3 Need for the Proposed Dredging Scheme 1 1.4 Structure of this NTS 1 2 Project Description 2 2.1 Introduction 2 2.2 Dredging Methodology and Timings 2 2.2.1 Methodology 2 2.2.2 Dredging Cycles and Programme 3 2.3 Consideration of Alternatives 4 3 The EIA Process 5 3.1 Legislative Requirements 5 3.2 Impact Assessment 5 4 Consultation 7 5 Existing Environment 8 5.1 Nature Conservation Designations 8 5.2 Physical and Chemical Environment 11 5.2.1 Coastal Processes and Hydrodynamics 11 5.2.2 Marine Water and Sediment Quality 12 5.3 Biological Environment 13 5.3.1 Benthic Ecology 13 5.3.2 Fish Ecology 13 5.3.3 Marine Mammals 14 5.3.4 Ornithology 15 5.4 Human Environment 16 5.4.1 Commercial and Recreational Navigation 16 5.4.2 Commercial and Recreational Fisheries 17 5.4.3 Archaeology and Historic Environment 17 5.4.4 Other Commercial and Recreational Activities 18 5.4.5 Coastal Protection and Flood Defence 20 6 Predicted Impacts and Recommended Mitigation Measures 22 6.1 Environmental Impacts 22 16 May 2016 I&BPB2107R001D01 ii O p e n 6.2 Water Framework Directive Compliance Assessment 31 6.3 Cumulative Impact Assessment 31 7 Conclusions 33 16 May 2016 I&BPB2107R001D01 iii O p e n Non- Technical Summary 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose of this NTS This ‘Non-Technical Summary’ (NTS) provides an overview of the findings of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process relating to DHB’s application for a Marine Licence to dredge aggregate from the Goodwin Sands, and reported in the Goodwin Sands Aggregate Dredging Environmental Statement (ES). The NTS is a standalone document which aims to use non-technical language – where possible – to describe the background to and need for the proposed Goodwin Sands aggregate dredging scheme (hereafter referred to as the proposed dredging scheme), and how it complies with the current marine licensing and regulatory regime. It describes the proposed dredging scheme, the baseline environmental conditions, the main predicted positive (beneficial) and negative (adverse) environmental impacts, and the recommended mitigation measures that are to be put in place to prevent or reduce significant adverse impacts. The ES and NTS have been prepared in accordance with the Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 (as amended by the Marine Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Amended) Regulations 2011), so as to provide the necessary supporting information for the required marine licence. The NTS summarises the ES and, although its format broadly follows that of the ES, some changes have been made so as to provide a more readable and concise summary. Photographs, tables and figures have been included to illustrate certain points or features; it should be noted that the figures are those provided in the ES, but without the typical figure template which provides information on the source of the data, figure version, etc. 1.2 The Proposed Dredging Scheme The Goodwin Sands Aggregate Dredging Scheme (hereafter referred to as the proposed dredging scheme) is a component of DHB’s wider development within the Western Docks at the Port of Dover (the Port), known as the Dover Western Docks Revival (DWDR) development. As part of the DWDR development there is a requirement for aggregate (i.e. sand) for land reclamation works and berth construction works. It is proposed that up to 2.5 million m3 of aggregate will be dredged from the South Goodwin Sands and transported along a vessel transit route to the DWDR site at the Port. The proposed dredge area, vessel transit route and the Port are shown in Figure 1.1. The location of the proposed dredge area is within the South Goodwin Sands sandbank system. The Goodwin Sands sandbank system is a dynamic, highly mobile environment that contains significant volumes of aggregate resource of various grading for coastal defence, coastal development and construction to supply a range of markets and projects. This important aggregate resource includes South Sand Head, Area 342 (an area historically dredged by DHB as a source of aggregate for port development), 16 May 2016 I&BPB2107R001D01 1 385000 390000 395000 400000 ± 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 7 7 6 6 5 5 Legend: Proposed Dredge Area Vessel Transit Route 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 6 6 5 5 Client: Project: Dover Harbour Goodwin Sands Board Aggregate Dredging Environmental Statement Title: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proposed Vessel Transit Route 5 5 6 6 6 6 5 5 Figure: Drawing No: 1.1 PB2107/ES/013 Revision: Date: Drawn: Checked: Size: Scale: 02 09/03/2016 JE DC A4 1:100,000 Port of Dover 01 11/11/2015 JE DC A4 1:100,000 Co-ordinate system: WGS 1984 UTM Zone 31N 0 2 4 © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd. Charts from MarineFIND.co.uk © Crown copyright, 2015. 0 0 0 Kilometres All rights reserved. Licence No EK001-0645-MF0095. Not to be used for navigation. 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 6 6 5 385000 390000 395000 400000 5 O p e n 1.3 Need for the Proposed Dredging Scheme The proposed dredging scheme is required to construct the DWDR development. The DWDR development will bring major regeneration to the Port’s Western Docks and maintain current jobs while creating new ones (Port of Dover, 2015). The existing cargo facilities at the Eastern Docks are constrained by land space and berth size and DHB wishes to expand its cargo business and provide larger and improved facilities for customers. The DWDR scheme will create new land space for the construction of new cargo handling facilities and the relocation of the cargo terminal from the Eastern Docks to the Western Docks will enable its expansion to meet customers’ requirements. The DWDR scheme will also create a new marina and waterfront and provide a significant addition to the leisure and amenity offering of Dover. 1.4 Structure of this NTS This section of the NTS (Section 1) provides an introduction and details of how to access or request copies of the ES, while Section 2 provides a summary of the proposed works. Section 3 provides a summary of the relevant legislation, consenting requirements and explains why an EIA was needed. Section 4 provides a summary of the consultation undertaken with key stakeholders to inform the EIA process. Section 5 describes, in summary, the existing baseline environmental conditions of the study area. Section 6 summarises the predicted impacts of the proposed dredging scheme on the physical, chemical, biological and human environment, and provides more details of the major and moderate negative and positive impacts to provide the reader with an understanding of how these impacts were established. All predicted impacts and proposed mitigation measures are presented in a summary table. Section 6 also summarises the cumulative impacts predicted (that is, the impacts of the proposed dredging scheme in cumulation with the impacts of other plans and proposed projects about which sufficient information is available to inform the assessment). Section 6 also summarises the findings of the Water Framework Directive (WFD) compliance assessment. This assessment is subject to different regulatory procedures to the EIA process. Finally, Section 7 presents the overall conclusions of the EIA process. 16 May 2016 I&BPB2107R001D01 1 O p e n 2 Project Description 2.1 Introduction DHB is proposing to dredge up to 2.5 million m3 of aggregate (generally comprising fine to coarse sand) from South Goodwin Sands, located approximately 19km north east of the Port of Dover. Dredging will be undertaken using one or two trailing suction hopper dredgers (TSHDs) and the aggregate will be transported within the dredger(s) along a vessel transit route to the DWDR site at the Port’s Western Docks for use as fill material for land reclamation works and bund construction works. The proposed dredge area is located on the western side of South Goodwin Sands (see Figure 1.1). It covers an area of 3.9km2 and extends from the Kellet Gut channel south west along the western side of the South Calliper sandbank.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Advisory Committee on Historic Wreck Sites Annual Report 2009 (April 2009 - March 2010)
    Department for Culture, Media and Sport Architecture and Historic Environment Division Advisory Committee on Historic Wreck Sites Annual Report 2009 (April 2009 - March 2010) Compiled by English Heritage for the Advisory Committee on Historic Wreck Sites. Text was also contributed by Cadw, Historic Scotland and the Environment and Heritage Service, Northern Ireland. s e vi a D n i t r a M © Contents ZONE ONE – Wreck Site Maps and Introduction UK Designated Shipwrecks Map ......................................................................................3 Scheduled and Listed Wreck Sites Map ..........................................................................4 Military Sites Map .................................................................................................................5 Foreword: Tom Hassall, ACHWS Chair ..........................................................................6 ZONE TWO – Case Studies on Protected Wreck Sites The Swash Channel, by Dave Parham and Paola Palma .....................................................................................8 Archiving the Historic Shipwreck Site of HMS Invincible, by Brandon Mason ............................................................................................................ 10 Recovery and Research of the Northumberland’s Chain Pump, by Daniel Pascoe ............................................................................................................... 14 Colossus Stores Ship? No! A Warship Being Lost? by Todd Stevens ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The American Ship, Northeastern Victory, Which Was Wrecked on the Goodwin Saiids in 1946
    The American ship, Northeastern Victory, which was wrecked on the Goodwin Saiids in 1946 £\) THE DOVER SOCIETY FOUNDED IN 1988 Registered with the Civic trust, Affiliated to the Kent Federation of Amenity Societies Registered Charity No. 299954 PRESIDENTS Brigadier M aurice A therton CBE VICE-PRESIDENTS: Howard Blackett, Ivan Green, Peter Johnson, Miss Lillian Kay, Peter Marsh, The Rt. Hon. The Lord Rees, Jonathan Sloggett, Tferry Sutton, Miss Christine Waterman, Jack Woolford and Martin Wright THE COMMITTEE C h airm an & Press Secretary: Tbrry Sutton MBE 17 Bewsbury Cross Lane, Whitfield, Dover CT16 3HB Tfel: 01304 820122 V ice-Ch a irm a n: Derek Leach OBE 24 Riverdale, River, Dover CT17 OGX Tfel: 01304 823926 H o n . Secretary: William Naylor "Wood End", 87 Leybume Road, Dover CT16 1SH Tfel: 01304 211276 H o n . T reasurer: Mike Weston 71 Castle Avenue, Dover CT16 1EZ Tfel: 01304 202059 M embership Secretary: Sheila Cope 53 Park Avenue, Dover CT16 1HD Tfel: 01304 211348 Social Secretary: Joan Liggett 19 Castle Avenue, Dover CT16 1HA Tfel: 01304 214886 E ditor: Merril Lilley 5 East Cliff, Dover CT16 1LX Tfel: 01304 205254 C hairm an of P lanning S ub-Com m ittee: Jack Woolford 1066 Green Lane, Tfemple Ewell, Dover CT16 3AR Tfel: 01304 330381 Cowgate P roject C o-o r d in a io r : Hugh Gordon 59 Castle Avenue, Dover CT16 1EZ Tfel: 01304 205115 A rchivist: Dr S.S.G. H ale 34 Church Hill, Tfemple Ewell, Dover CT16 3DR Tfel: 01304 825670 Jeremy Cope, Lesley Gordon, Anthony Lane, Mike McFarnell, Ken Wraight Content 2 EDITORIAL 4 PLANNING
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeological Evaluation of Wetlands
    98084_Report_Cover_2A_outline 16/6/06 11:38 am Page 1 Report prepared by Lis Dyson, Ellen Heppell, Casper Johnson and Marnix Pieters with Cecile Baeteman, Jan Bastiaens, Katrien Cousserier, Koen Deforce, Isabel Jansen, Erwin Meylemans, Liesbet Schietecatte, Liesbeth Theunissen, Robert van Heeringen, Johan van Laecke and Inge Zeebroek This project has received European Regional Development Funding through the INTERREG IIIB Community initiative 98084_Report_Cover_2A_outline 16/6/06 11:38 am Page 2 © The authors and Kent County Council on behalf of the Planarch Partnership. Maidstone 2006 ISBN 1 901509 75 3 98084_Report_Cover_2A_outline 16/6/06 11:38 am Page 3 Report prepared by Lis Dyson, Casper Johnson (Kent County Council), Ellen Heppell (Essex County Council), and Marnix Pieters (VIOE) with Cecile Baeteman, (Koninklijk Belgisch Instituut voor Natuurwetenschappen), Liesbeth Theunissen, Robert van Heeringen (ROB), Katrien Cousserier, Isabel Jansen (CAI), Koen Deforce, Jan Bastiaens, Erwin Meylemans, Liesbet Schietecatte, Johan van Laecke and Inge Zeebroek (VIOE) May 2006 © The authors and Kent County Council on behalf of the Planarch partners Maidstone 2006 ISBN 1 901509 761 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY…………………………………………………………….………..….i 1. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………..…..1 2. WETLAND MAP FOR NWE by K. Cousserier ………………………………………………13 3. PLANARCH 2 PILOT STUDIES 3.1 THE STUMBLE, ESSEX by E. Heppell………………………………………………23 3.2 THE BELGIAN POLDERS, FLANDERS: A TEST CASE 2002-2006 by M. Pieters, L. Schietecatte, I. Zeebroek, E. Meylemans, I. Jansen & J. van Laecke…………………………………………………………………………39 3.3 KENT by L. Dyson ……………………………………………………………………..55 3.4 THE THREAT OF DESICCATION - RECENT WORK ON THE IN SITU MONITORING OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL WETLAND SITES IN THE NETHERLANDS by R.M. van Heeringen & E.M.
    [Show full text]
  • British Birds |
    VOL. XLVIII JULY No. 7 1955 BRITISH BIRDS DO ENGLISH WOODPIGEONS MIGRATE ? By DAVID LACK (Edward Grey Institute, Oxford) and M. G. RIDPATH (Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Tolworth) INTRODUCTION THE object of this short paper is to draw attention to a curious problem in the hope that others will help in solving it. The obser­ vations here described, made independently by Lack round Oxford and by Ridpath in Kent and Sussex, cannot be satisfactorily interpreted until more is known from other parts of England. At first, each of us supposed that we had chanced on a big autumn migration of Woodpigeons (Cohimba palumbus), but now we are doubtful. The earlier literature on the migration of Woodpigeons was reviewed by Alexander (1940) and re-summarized by Snow (1953). So far as England is concerned the evidence was conflicting. In the autumn, there might be an arrival from Scandinavia into East Anglia and from north-western France into S.E. England, while a S.W. movement was seen for many years in the Stour valley, Worcestershire. That is all, and as yet it is quite uncertain whether the apparent increase in Woodpigeons in southern England in autumn is due to purely local aggregation or to migration and, if to migration, whether this comes from northern Britain, Scandi­ navia or France. OBSERVATIONS ROUND OXFORD (D. LACK) In 1953, during an autumn watch for visible migration on Boars Hill, just outside Oxford, big flights of Woodpigeons were noted going south in the early mornings during the last few days of October. At first they were dismissed as feeding movements from a roost, but over 400 individuals passed on 30th October and they flew high like migrants.
    [Show full text]
  • South Foreland Lighthouse Access Statement
    South Foreland Lighthouse Access Statement The Front, St Margaret’s Bay, Dover, Kent, CT15 6HP T: 01304 853281 E: [email protected] Introduction 1. The lighthouse is situated on the iconic White Cliffs of Dover 2 miles from the White Cliffs Visitor Centre. The grounds are grassed with a pebble driveway. 2. There is limited mobile phone reception at the property 3. Assistance dogs are welcome throughout and water is provided outside the lighthouse and in the tearoom courtyard 4. Access to the lighthouse tower can be challenging with 73 stairs to the top some of which are narrow and difficult to climb 5. We recommend that all visitors with access needs call ahead to discuss their visit with a member of staff Arrival & Parking Facilities 1. On-site parking is only available to disabled visitors if booked in advance. All other visitors park at the White Cliffs of Dover and walk to site following the waymarked footpath (2 miles). 2. Visitors who have arranged to park in the grounds park on the grass near the lighthouse tower. This area is sloping and can be muddy and uneven. Disabled visitors can be dropped off closer to the tower or tearoom if arranged in advance. 3. The paths around the lighthouse are made of 25mm stones which are challenging when using a wheelchair. WCs 1. There is an accessible toilet in the main toilet block with wider doors 2. Both the main door and the toilet door are manually operated 3. The bathroom is 2m x 1.8m with a 410mm high toilet with left hand transfer.
    [Show full text]
  • An Economic Plan for Broadstairs 2016
    AN ECONOMIC PLAN FOR BROADSTAIRS 2016 In 1851 Charles Dickens wrote Our English Watering Place, an essay to his favourite seaside holiday resort – Broadstairs: ‘since I have been idling at the window here, the tide has risen. The boats are dancing on the bubbling water; the colliers are afloat again; the white-bordered waves rush in; the children Do chase the ebbing Neptune, and do fly him When he comes back; the radiant sails are gliding past the shore, and shining on the far horizon; all the sea is sparkling, heaving, swelling up with life and beauty, this bright morning’ Our English Watering Place, Charles Dickens (1851) CONTENTS 1 Introduction 2. Background 3 Broadstairs & St Peter's Coastal Community Team 4. Local area 5. Community 6. Economy 7. Related Initiatives 8. Ambition 9. Needs of the community 10. SWOT analysis 11. Data 12 Delivering the Plan 12.1 Key projects 12.2 Short term goals/ actions for the first 6 months 12.3. Medium term goals/actions 12.4 Performance measures 12.5. Long term goals: strategic plan beyond 5 years 12.6 Barriers 12.7 Resources 12.8 Costs 12.9 Value 12.10 Funding 12.11. Maximising resources 13 Communications 13.1. Consultation 13.2. Communication and Engagement with partners and other bodies 13.3 Communication with community 14 Logistics 14.1. Management of the Team. 14.2 Support Structure 14.3 Costs 14.4 Sustainability 14.5 Areas of Specific Interest 1. INTRODUCTION Broadstairs & St Peter's is a charming and attractive resort town situated on the Isle of Thanet, on the eastern edge of Kent.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime (PDF, 1.2
    South East Research Framework Resource Assessment and Research Agenda for Maritime (2012 with additions in 2013 and 2019) Maritime Gustav Milne (with contributions by Luke Barber, Polydora Baker, Joe Flatman and Dave Hooley) Contents Resource Assessment ................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 Submerged Landscapes...................................................................................... 2 The Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund (with Dr J Flatman) ............................ 3 Nautical archaeology in south-east England: a resource assessment .................... 7 Figure 1 The Dover Bronze Age boat under excavation. Kent County Council . 10 Nautical Archaeology underwater, on land and in the inter-tidal zone (including a summary of marine management practice by Dave Hooley) ............................. 10 Wrecks and Hulks ............................................................................................. 11 Boats, 'barges' and ships ................................................................................... 12 Small boats ........................................................................................................ 13 Boats ................................................................................................................. 14 'Barges' .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Beach Sustainability and Biodiversity on Eastern Channel Coasts
    Beach Sustainability and Biodiversity on Eastern Channel Coasts Interim Report of the Beaches At Risk (BAR) Project January 2005 BAR: BEACHES AT RISK Beaches at Risk is a partnership project part funded by the European Union Regional Development Fund, under the INTERREG III programme. The principal partners are: University of Sussex East Sussex County Council Université de Rouen in association with the Université de Caen Université du Littoral, Dunkerque For further information visit the project web site at www.geog.sussex.ac.uk/BAR or contact the BAR Project Leader Dr Cherith Moses, Department of Geography, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9QJ. Phone +44 (0)1273 877037. Fax. +44 (0)1273 677196. E-mail [email protected]. Interim Report of the Beaches At Risk (BAR) Project BEACH SUSTAINABILITY AND BIODIVERSITY ON EASTERN CHANNEL COASTS English project team: University of Sussex, Department of Geography Executive team: Dr Cherith Moses (Overall Project Leader) Dr David Robinson Dr Rendel Williams (Deputy Project Leader) Research team: Dr Uwe Dornbusch Jerome Curoy Faye Gillespie Elinor Low Tamsin Watt East Sussex County Council, Environment Group Ecology team: Dr Kate Cole Dr Alex Tait (Deputy Project Leader) Tracey Younghusband Organisations supporting the project through match funding: Brighton and Hove City Council Environment Agency Pevensey Coastal Defence Ltd. Posford Haskoning Ltd. Associated organisations: English Nature, Hastings Borough Council, Kent County Council, Lewes District Council, National
    [Show full text]
  • Cultura E Civiltà the White Cliffs of Dover Trascrizione the White Cliffs of Dover Form Part of the Coastline of England Facing
    Cultura e Civiltà The White Cliffs of Dover Trascrizione The White Cliffs of Dover form part of the coastline of England facing France. The cliffs are as high as 350 feet in some places. They have a striking appearance because the cliff face is made of chalk with streaks of black flint. Thousands of years ago, the whole area was under the sea. Lots of very small sea creatures died and over the years their bones and shells were pressed together and became chalk. They gradually rose up, becoming white cliffs. Erosion from the seawater keeps the cliffs white and where the sea cannot reach them, they are covered by vegetation. The White Cliffs of Dover are often considered a symbol of England because they are the last sight that travelers see when they leave England, and the first thing they see when they arrive. In fact, at the point where they rise, England is only 21 miles from the French coast. These cliffs were an important part of the defenses of Britain during both World Wars. However, their importance goes much farther back in history. The White Cliffs of Dover stood tall through several invasion attempts, from Julius Caesar in 55 BC to Hitler’s Nazis in 1940. Under the Romans, the Cliffs were used as the base for a lighthouse. In the Middle Ages, Dover Castle, nicknamed ‘The Key to England’ because of its strategic location, was built there. It is the largest castle in England. During the Napoleonic Wars, prisoners of the castle carved secret tunnels under the Cliffs, which Winston Churchill later used as his World War II headquarters.
    [Show full text]
  • Filming at the White Cliffs of Dover & South Foreland Lighthouse
    Filming at the White Cliffs of Dover & South Foreland Lighthouse The White Cliffs of Dover office, 1 Centenary Cottages, Langdon Cliffs, Upper Road, Dover, Kent – CT16 1HJ. Sat-Nav CT15 5NA Call our dedicated filming and locations office on 020 7824 7128 or 020 7824 7129 • The filming & locations office issue filming contracts, check insurance and set fees. They will issue you with a filming application form and liaise with on-site staff regarding the feasibility of what you want to do. The application form is not a permit to film, permission is granted if the property can accommodate you and a filming contract is issued by this office and signed by both parties. • This office does not deal with: student photo shoots and filming, wedding photos, news crews or radio. Please direct queries to 01304 207326 or [email protected] • All crews must hold £5m worth of public liability insurance (or the equivalent in their currency.) No crew of any size can film at a National Trust site without this. • We welcome reccie visits and are happy to meet you to discuss your filming needs – please call the filming and location team to arrange a visit. • Great shots of the cliff are easily accessible with a 2 minute walk from our car park. • There is limited access to the cliff-top for vehicles – however access for vehicles can be arranged to selected locations if arranged in advance with the filming office. • There is no access to the beach below the cliffs from our land. • The lighthouse is not usually open everyday of the week, so private access can be arranged if required.
    [Show full text]
  • Seascape Character Assessment Report
    Seascape Character Assessment for the South East Inshore marine plan area MMO 1134: Seascape Character Assessment for the South East Inshore marine plan area September 2018 Report prepared by: Land Use Consultants (LUC) Project funded by: European Maritime Fisheries Fund (ENG1595) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Version Author Note 0.1 Sally Marshall First draft desk-based report completed May 2015 Kate Ahern 1.0 Kate Ahern Updated draft final report following stakeholder consultation, August 2018 1.1 Chris Graham, MMO Comments David Hutchinson 2.0 Kate Ahern Final report, September 2018 2.1 Chris Sweeting Independent QA © Marine Management Organisation 2018 You may use and re-use the information featured on this website (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. Visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/ to view the licence or write to: Information Policy Team The National Archives Kew London TW9 4DU Email: [email protected] Information about this publication and further copies are available from: Marine Management Organisation Lancaster House Hampshire Court Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 7YH Tel: 0300 123 1032 Email: [email protected] Website: www.gov.uk/mmo Disclaimer This report contributes to the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) evidence base which is a resource developed through a large range of research activity and methods carried out by both MMO and external experts. The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of MMO nor are they intended to indicate how MMO will act on a given set of facts or signify any preference for one research activity or method over another.
    [Show full text]
  • Folkestone & Hythe District Heritage Strategy
    EB 11.14b Folkestone & Hythe District Heritage Strategy Appendix 1: Theme 4b The District’s Maritime Coast – Wrecks 1 | P a g e PROJECT: Folkestone & Hythe District Heritage Strategy DOCUMENT NAME: Theme 4(b): Wrecks Version Status Prepared by Date V01 INTERNAL DRAFT F Clark 18.01.17 Comments - First draft of text. No illustrations, photographs or figures. Need to finalise references. Could add to “Unprotected Wrecks” with data from HER if needed? Version Status Prepared by Date V02 RETURNED DRAFT D Whittington 16.11.18 Update back from FHDC Version Status Prepared by Date V03 CONSULTATION DRAFT F Clark 29.11.18 Comments – Check through and title page inserted. Version Status Prepared by Date V04 Version Status Prepared by Date V05 2 | P a g e 4(b) Wrecks 1. Summary The Channel and Strait of Dover is one of the busiest shipping lanes in the world. They have been the setting for a range of maritime activities and events going back to ancient times which also reflects the growing importance of various ports along the Kentish coastline, such as the Cinque Ports. The Channel has seen the arrival of invasion fleets and raiding vessels going back to the Roman period, and has been the scene of a number of naval conflicts. It has often acted as a frontline defence during times of warfare, and then in times of peace is an important trading route for both visiting vessels and those on route to other national and international ports. It is therefore unsurprising that a number of vessels have been lost to the sea over the years and now comprise a valuable collection of wrecks off the coast of the district.
    [Show full text]