Election Update 2005: Mauritius

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Election Update 2005: Mauritius ELECTION UPDATE 2005 MAURITIUS Number 1 17 June 2005 Contents Election held Earlier than Expected 1 Constitutional and Legal Framework 2 Electoral Commissions 3 Capacity of the Electoral Management Bodies 4 Electoral System 5 Review of Previous Elections 7 Political Parties, Factionalism, Manifestoes and Financing 8 The Media 9 Civil Society 10 Election Conflict Management 11 Compiled by Amedee Darga EISA Editorial Team Jackie Kalley, Khabele Matlosa, Denis Kadima Published with the assistance of the New Zealand Embassy Elections held Earlier September 2005. As per the days nor more than 30 days than Expected Representation of People Act after the day on which the (1958), as subsequently writ is issued and the day on Mauritius is holding a amended, the President, which a poll is to take place, general election on July 3, acting in accordance with the shall be at least 15 days and 2005 to elect a new advice of the Prime Minister no more than 60 days, after parliament and thereby a shall, for the purpose of the day the nomination of new government. The term electing a new Parliament, candidates is received. of the outgoing government not later than 55 days after a started in September 2000. dissolution of Parliament This means that when the under section 57 of the 2000 – 2005 Parliament The general election is being Constitution, issue a writ of would have naturally been held ahead of normal election directed to the dissolved, on 20 September schedule and at a time of the returning officer of every 2005, there was a maximum incumbent’s choosing. The constituency, specifying the limit of up to 145 days for life of the parliament elected day of the election. Election holding the election, that is in 2000 ends on 11 day shall be not less than 15 up to 3 February 2006. election update 2005 Mauritius number 1 However, as a general rule The government presented election observers to observe elections are never held its national budget in April the election process in between January and the 2005 ahead of the normal Mauritius where, in beginning of April as this time in June and connection with an election, coincides with the cyclonic immediately after approval they have been – season and has a by parliament proceeded (a) designated to do so by concentration of religious with the dissolution. any international or regional festivals. So, one can Parliament was dissolved organisation; and reasonably conclude, it with effect from 24 April (b) with the approval of the would have been normal that 2005 and the President of the Electoral Supervisory the 2005 general election be Republic issued writs of Commission, authorised to held between September and election for the purpose of do so by the Electoral December 2005. electing a new Parliament on Commissioner. 9 May 2005, appointing 30 However, the Prime Minister May 2005 as nomination Political representation at decided to call the general day. The President further both national and local election six months earlier in appointed 3 July 2005, as the government level in order to avoid having to hold day on which the Poll is to Mauritius is through a fully a by-election in a particularly be held. competitive electoral difficult constituency. The process. Political by-election was caused by Constitutional and Legal representation is based on the resignation of a member Framework universal adult suffrage of parliament of the expressed through a secret opposition from constituency The provisions for ballot. The voting age is 18 No. 3. On applying the determining members of years and above. The life of provisions of the parliament, the appointment a parliament is for a Representation of People and functions of electoral maximum of five years. The Act, a by-election would management bodies, the members of the National have become due at the latest determination of election Assembly are elected at a in April 2005, i.e. seven dates and official nomination general election. Sixty-two months before the general of candidates, the members are elected on a election. The government registration of voters, the first past the post basis from feared losing the by-election election management and twenty-one constituencies. which could have a snowball challenge processes, the Additionally, eight other effect for the general mode of election, the mode members are appointed as election, with negative of voting, and the Best Loser members of consequences, especially appointment of additional parliament, thus giving a since it had already lost a by- seats (also known as best national assembly of election in December 2003. losers) are long and well seventy. The appointment is As per the law, the only way established in the made by the Electoral to avoid holding the by- Constitution of Mauritius, Supervisory Commission on election was for government the Representation of People the basis of a mechanism to dissolve parliament before Act 1968, and in the prescribed under the Section the date for the by-election National Assembly 5 of the First Schedule of the was due. As from the time of Regulations 1968 (4th Constitution and in a manner the dissolution, the clock Schedule Act) and 12/68. that ensures adequate starts ticking, as provided for The Representation of representation of the in the law. People Act was amended in officially recognised ethnic 2005 to provide for the first groups without changing the time, for international balance of forces between 2 election update 2005 Mauritius number 1 the parties as obtained persons who belong to Electoral Boundaries through direct suffrage. parties other than the most Commission, the Electoral successful party, shall be Supervisory Commission Section 5 (1) of the First ascertained, and so far as is and the Electoral Schedule of the Constitution possible that number of seats Commissioner. states the following: “In (out of the second 4 seats) order to ensure a fair and shall be allocated one by one Section 38 of the adequate representation of to the most successful Constitution stipulates the each community, there shall unreturned candidates (if following regarding the be 8 seats in the Assembly, any) belonging both to the structure of the Electoral additional to the 62 seats for most successful party and to Boundaries Commission and members representing the appropriate community. the Electoral Supervisory constituencies, which shall Where there is no unreturned Commission: so far as is possible be candidate of the appropriate (1) There shall be an allocated to persons community, seats will be Electoral Boundaries belonging to parties who allocated to the most Commission which shall have stood as candidates for successful unreturned consist of a chairman and not election as members at the candidates belonging to the less than two or more than general election but have not most successful party, seven other members been returned as members to irrespective of community. appointed by the President, represent constituencies”. acting in accordance with the The proclamation of the advice of the Prime Minister The term “community” here dissolution of the National which is tendered after the means “ethnic group”. Assembly is done by the latter has consulted the President of the Republic Leader of the Opposition. Section 5 (3) The first 4 of although the choice of the (2) There shall be an the 8 seats shall, so far as is date for dissolution is the Electoral Supervisory possible, each be allocated to prerogative of the Prime Commission which shall the most successful Minister. However, as per consist of a chairperson unreturned candidate, if any, the amendment of the appointed by the President in who is a member of a party Constitution in 1982 and as accordance with the advice and who belongs to the per section 57(2), the of the Judicial and Legal appropriate community, National Assembly is Service Commission and not regardless of which party he automatically dissolved five less than two or more than belongs to. years from the date of the seven other members first sitting. From the date of appointed by the President, “Appropriate community “in dissolution of the National acting in accordance with the the above section means the Assembly, the election advice of the Prime Minister community, which is most process follows a well tendered after the latter has under-represented. The basis established and well consulted the Leader of the for determining the under- rehearsed pattern. Opposition. representation is the 1972 (3) No person shall be population census figure. Electoral Commissions qualified for appointment as a member of the Electoral Section 5 (4) When the first Two bodies and one official Boundaries Commission or 4 seats (or as many as have the constitutional the Electoral Supervisory possible of those seats) have responsibility for the Commission if he is a been allocated, the preparation, management member of, or a candidate number of such seats that and oversight of the election for election to, the Assembly have been allocated to processes. These are the or any local authority or a 3 election update 2005 Mauritius number 1 public officer or a local functions relating to the chairman and two to seven government officer. registration and elections as members, all appointed by may be prescribed, and he the President “acting in Section 40 describes the shall keep the Electoral accordance with the advice office of the Electoral Supervisory Commission of the Prime Minister Commissioner: fully informed concerning tendered after the Prime (1) There shall be an the exercise of his functions Minister has consulted the Electoral Commissioner, and shall have the right to leader of the Opposition.”1 whose office shall be a attend meetings of the The Commission may “take public office and who shall Commission and to refer to into account representations be appointed by the Judicial the Commission for their made to it in respect of any and Legal Service advice or decisions regarding proposed alteration of a Commission.
Recommended publications
  • Sadc Electoral Observation Mission to the Republic of Mauritius Statement by the Hon. Maite Nkoana-Mashabane (Mp) Minister of In
    SADC ELECTORAL OBSERVATION MISSION TO THE REPUBLIC OF MAURITIUS STATEMENT BY THE HON. MAITE NKOANA-MASHABANE (MP) MINISTER OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND COOPERATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA AND HEAD OF THE SADC ELECTORAL OBSERVATION MISSION TO THE 2014 NATIONAL ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS IN THE REPUBLIC OF MAURITIUS, DELIVERED ON 11 DECEMBER 2014 Moka, Republic of Mauritius Mr. Abdool Rahman, Electoral Commissioner, Your Excellency, Dr Aminata Touré, Head of the African Union (AU) Election Observation Mission, Honourable Ellen Molekane, Deputy Minister of State Security of the Republic of South Africa, Ambassador Julius Tebello Metsing of the Kingdom of Lesotho, the incoming Chairperson and Ambassador Theresia Samaria of the Republic of Namibia, representing outgoing Chairperson of the SADC Organ Troika, respectively, Your Excellency, Ms. Emilie Mushobekwa, SADC Deputy Executive Secretary, Fellow Heads of International Electoral Observation Missions, High Commissioners, Ambassadors, and other Members of the Diplomatic Corps, Esteemed Leaders of Political Parties and Independent Candidates, Members of the Media and of Civil Society Organisations, 2 Distinguished Ladies and Gentlemen, We are gathered here this morning to share with you the preliminary findings of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Electoral Observation Mission (SEOM) to the National Assembly Elections in the Republic of Mauritius, held on 10 December 2014. We thank you for graciously honouring our invitation. Your Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, This year we have witnessed an unprecedented number of elections in the SADC region, in Malawi, South Africa, Mozambique, Botswana and Namibia. On Wednesday, 10 December, the people of Mauritius also participated in this festival of democracy. In January and February 2015, the Republic of Zambia and the Kingdom of Lesotho, will also go to the polls.
    [Show full text]
  • Debate No 35 of 2018 (UNREVISED)
    1 No. 35 of 2018 SIXTH NATIONAL ASSEMBLY PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) (UNREVISED) FIRST SESSION FRIDAY 07 DECEMBER 2018 2 CONTENTS PAPERS LAID QUESTION (Oral) MOTION ANNOUNCEMENT BILL (Public) ADJOURNMENT 3 THE CABINET (Formed by Hon. Pravind Kumar Jugnauth) Hon. Pravind Kumar Jugnauth Prime Minister, Minister of Home Affairs, External Communications and National Development Unit, Minister of Finance and Economic Development Hon. Ivan Leslie Collendavelloo, GCSK, Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Energy and Public SC Utilities Hon. Sir Anerood Jugnauth, GCSK, Minister Mentor, Minister of Defence, Minister for KCMG, QC Rodrigues Hon. Mrs Fazila Jeewa-Daureeawoo Vice-Prime Minister, Minister of Local Government and Outer Islands, Minister of Gender Equality, Child Development and Family Welfare Hon. Seetanah Lutchmeenaraidoo, GCSK Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade Hon. Yogida Sawmynaden Minister of Technology, Communication and Innovation Hon. Nandcoomar Bodha, GCSK Minister of Public Infrastructure and Land Transport Hon. Mrs Leela Devi Dookun-Luchoomun Minister of Education and Human Resources, Tertiary Education and Scientific Research Hon. Anil Kumarsingh Gayan, SC Minister of Tourism Dr. the Hon. Mohammad Anwar Husnoo Minister of Health and Quality of Life Hon. Prithvirajsing Roopun Minister of Arts and Culture Hon. Marie Joseph Noël Etienne Ghislain Minister of Social Security, National Solidarity, and Sinatambou Environment and Sustainable Development Hon. Mahen Kumar Seeruttun Minister of Agro-Industry and Food Security Hon. Ashit Kumar Gungah Minister of Industry, Commerce and Consumer Protection Hon. Maneesh Gobin Attorney General, Minister of Justice, Human Rights and Institutional Reforms Hon. Jean Christophe Stephan Toussaint Minister of Youth and Sports Hon. Soomilduth Bholah Minister of Business, Enterprise and Cooperatives 4 Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Debate No 37 of 2018 (UNREVISED)
    1 No. 37 of 2018 SIXTH NATIONAL ASSEMBLY PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) (UNREVISED) FIRST SESSION MONDAY 10 DECEMBER 2018 2 CONTENTS PAPERS LAID MOTION BILL (Public) ADJOURNMENT 3 THE CABINET (Formed by Hon. Pravind Kumar Jugnauth) Hon. Pravind Kumar Jugnauth Prime Minister, Minister of Home Affairs, External Communications and National Development Unit, Minister of Finance and Economic Development Hon. Ivan Leslie Collendavelloo, GCSK, Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Energy and Public SC Utilities Hon. Sir Anerood Jugnauth, GCSK, Minister Mentor, Minister of Defence, Minister for KCMG, QC Rodrigues Hon. Mrs Fazila Jeewa-Daureeawoo Vice-Prime Minister, Minister of Local Government and Outer Islands, Minister of Gender Equality, Child Development and Family Welfare Hon. Seetanah Lutchmeenaraidoo, GCSK Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade Hon. Yogida Sawmynaden Minister of Technology, Communication and Innovation Hon. Nandcoomar Bodha, GCSK Minister of Public Infrastructure and Land Transport Hon. Mrs Leela Devi Dookun-Luchoomun Minister of Education and Human Resources, Tertiary Education and Scientific Research Hon. Anil Kumarsingh Gayan, SC Minister of Tourism Dr. the Hon. Mohammad Anwar Husnoo Minister of Health and Quality of Life Hon. Prithvirajsing Roopun Minister of Arts and Culture Hon. Marie Joseph Noël Etienne Ghislain Minister of Social Security, National Solidarity, and Sinatambou Environment and Sustainable Development Hon. Mahen Kumar Seeruttun Minister of Agro-Industry and Food Security Hon. Ashit Kumar Gungah Minister of Industry, Commerce and Consumer Protection Hon. Maneesh Gobin Attorney General, Minister of Justice, Human Rights and Institutional Reforms Hon. Jean Christophe Stephan Toussaint Minister of Youth and Sports Hon. Soomilduth Bholah Minister of Business, Enterprise and Cooperatives 4 Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Democracy in Mauritius
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Stellenbosch University SUNScholar Repository Development with Social Justice? Social Democracy in Mauritius Letuku Elias Phaahla 15814432 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (International Studies) at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Professor Janis van der Westhuizen March 2010 ii Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the owner of the copyright thereof (unless to the extent explicitly otherwise stated) and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Signature:……………………….. Date:…………………………….. iii To God be the glory My dearly beloved late sisters, Pabalelo and Kholofelo Phaahla The late Leah Maphankgane The late Letumile Saboshego I know you are looking down with utmost pride iv Abstract Since the advent of independence in 1968, Mauritius’ economic trajectory evolved from the one of a monocrop sugar economy, with the latter noticeably being the backbone of the country’s economy, to one that progressed into being the custodian of a dynamic and sophisticated garment-dominated manufacturing industry. Condemned with the misfortune of not being endowed with natural resources, relative to her mainland African counterparts, Mauritius, nonetheless, was able to break the shackles of limited economic options and one of being the ‘basket-case’ to gradually evolving into being the upper-middle-income country - thus depicting it to be one of the most encouraging economies within the developing world.
    [Show full text]
  • Mauritius Country Report BTI 2018
    BTI 2018 Country Report Mauritius This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2018. It covers the period from February 1, 2015 to January 31, 2017. The BTI assesses the transformation toward democracy and a market economy as well as the quality of political management in 129 countries. More on the BTI at http://www.bti-project.org. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2018 Country Report — Mauritius. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2018. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Contact Bertelsmann Stiftung Carl-Bertelsmann-Strasse 256 33111 Gütersloh Germany Sabine Donner Phone +49 5241 81 81501 [email protected] Hauke Hartmann Phone +49 5241 81 81389 [email protected] Robert Schwarz Phone +49 5241 81 81402 [email protected] Sabine Steinkamp Phone +49 5241 81 81507 [email protected] BTI 2018 | Mauritius 3 Key Indicators Population M 1.3 HDI 0.781 GDP p.c., PPP $ 21088 Pop. growth1 % p.a. 0.1 HDI rank of 188 64 Gini Index 35.8 Life expectancy years 74.4 UN Education Index 0.758 Poverty3 % 3.2 Urban population % 39.5 Gender inequality2 0.380 Aid per capita $ 60.6 Sources (as of October 2017): The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2017 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2016. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $3.20 a day at 2011 international prices. Executive Summary Mauritius is not a transformation country in the classic sense.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMARY RECORDS of the PROCEEDINGS of the 128Th IPU ASSEMBLY Quito (Ecuador) 22-27 March 2013
    SUMMARY RECORDS OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 128th IPU ASSEMBLY Quito (Ecuador) 22-27 March 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page(s) Introduction ............................................................................................................ 5 Inaugural ceremony · Speech by Mr. Fernando Cordero Cueva, Speaker of the National Assembly of Ecuador .......................................................................................................... 6 · Speech by Mr. Philippe Douste-Blazy, United Nations Under-Secretary-General and Special Adviser on Innovative Financing for Development .......................... 6 · Speech by Mr. Abdelwahad Radi, President of the Inter-Parliamentary Union ..... 7 · Speech by Mr. Rafael Correa Delgado, President of the Republic of Ecuador ..... 8 Organization of the work of the Assembly · Election of the President and Vice-Presidents of the 128th Assembly and opening of the General Debate ........................................................................................ 11 · Consideration of requests for the inclusion of an emergency item in the Assembly agenda .......................................................................................... 26 29 · Final Assembly Agenda ...................................................................................... General Debate on the overall theme: From unrelenting growth to purposeful development “buen vivir": New approaches, new solutions ......................................... 11 · Interactive dialogue session on the place of democratic
    [Show full text]
  • BTI 2020 Country Report Mauritius
    BTI 2020 Country Report Mauritius This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2020. It covers the period from February 1, 2017 to January 31, 2019. The BTI assesses the transformation toward democracy and a market economy as well as the quality of governance in 137 countries. More on the BTI at https://www.bti-project.org. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2020 Country Report — Mauritius. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2020. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Contact Bertelsmann Stiftung Carl-Bertelsmann-Strasse 256 33111 Gütersloh Germany Sabine Donner Phone +49 5241 81 81501 [email protected] Hauke Hartmann Phone +49 5241 81 81389 [email protected] Robert Schwarz Phone +49 5241 81 81402 [email protected] Sabine Steinkamp Phone +49 5241 81 81507 [email protected] BTI 2020 | Mauritius 3 Key Indicators Population M 1.3 HDI 0.796 GDP p.c., PPP $ 23709 Pop. growth1 % p.a. 0.1 HDI rank of 189 66 Gini Index 38.5 Life expectancy years 74.5 UN Education Index 0.730 Poverty3 % 3.0 Urban population % 40.8 Gender inequality2 0.369 Aid per capita $ 9.2 Sources (as of December 2019): The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2019 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2019. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $3.20 a day at 2011 international prices. Executive Summary Mauritius is not a transformation country in the classic sense.
    [Show full text]
  • Despite Concerns About Electoral Commission and Conflict, Mauritians Value Open Elections
    Dispatch No. 327 | 4 November 2019 Despite concerns about electoral commission and conflict, Mauritians value open elections Afrobarometer Dispatch No. 327 | Sadhiska Bhoojedhur and Thomas Isbell Summary During the first weekend of October, the Mauritian prime minister dissolved Parliament and called a general election for November 7 – a surprise announcement that left both the electoral commission and political parties scrambling (Weekly, 2019). The current government has claimed several high-visibility successes, including the launch of the Metro Express light-rail public transport system, the elimination of some university fees for students, the introduction of minimum salary compensation and a negative income tax, and the inauguration of a sports complex (Duymun, 2018; Seegobin, 2019). But critics point to persistent challenges such as unemployment, corruption, and weaknesses in delivering health care, education, and other public services (Duymun, 2018). In light of the upcoming election, this dispatch uses Afrobarometer survey data from 2012- 2017 to explore popular attitudes toward elections among ordinary Mauritians. We find that while Mauritians overwhelmingly feel that their last national election was free and fair, their trust in the electoral commission has declined sharply. Nonetheless, most citizens support elections as the best way to choose their leaders and want multiparty competition to ensure that voters have real choices. Citizens’ priorities for government action, as of late 2017, were unemployment, poverty, and crime – issues on which the government’s performance received poor marks. Afrobarometer survey Afrobarometer heads a pan-African, nonpartisan research network that conducts public attitude surveys on democracy, governance, economic conditions, and related issues across Africa. Seven rounds of surveys were completed in up to 38 countries between 1999 and 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility Legislation Around the World: Emergent Varieties and National Experiences
    MANDATORY CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY LEGISLATION AROUND THE WORLD: EMERGENT VARIETIES AND NATIONAL EXPERIENCES Li-Wen Lin* INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 430 I.MANDATORY CSR DUE DILIGENCE............................................... 434 A. National Experience: France........................................... 435 II.MANDATORY CORPORATE PHILANTHROPY.................................. 439 A. National Experience (1): Mauritius ................................ 440 B. National Experience (2): India........................................ 442 III.MANDATORY CSR GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE........................... 445 A. National Experience: South Africa................................. 446 IV.MANDATORY GENERAL CSR DUTY (UNDER CORPORATE LAW) 449 A. National Experience (1): China ...................................... 449 B. National Experience (2): Indonesia ................................ 453 V.EVALUATION................................................................................. 457 A. The Impetus of the Law.................................................. 457 B. The Scope of Corporations Subject to the Law.............. 459 C. The Definition of CSR.................................................... 460 D. The Implementation of the Law ..................................... 461 E. The Function of the Law ................................................ 463 F. The Relationship Between the Laws and Beyond .......... 464 G. The Reform of the Law .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Commission on Constitutional and Electoral Reform 2001/02
    REPORT OF THE COMMISSION ON CONSTITUTIONAL AND ELECTORAL REFORM 2001/02 Introduction 1. In a society as lively and politically literate as Mauritius, it is not surprising that the Commission for Constitutional and Electoral Reform1 should be inundated with submissions2. Over a period of several weeks we received more than seventy written memoranda and heard oral representations during more than fifty sessions. We also organised three public sessions in Mauritius and one in Rodrigues. The task of sifting through the great mass of material was considerably assisted by the fact that, whether they came from organised political parties, cultural groups or concerned individuals, the depositions were forceful and articulate. We would like to express our appreciation to all the many persons, both exalted and humble, who contributed information, ideas and perspectives. In equal measure, we thank the Mauritian support team, whose outstanding logistical and administrative backup enabled us to handle this vast mass of material with great expedition. 2. If the volume of material was not unexpected, what was surprising, given the robust nature of political life in Mauritius, was the relatively high degree of consensus on the need for change in a number of key areas. Thus, virtually all the deponents accepted the idea that steps should be taken to strengthen guarantees of free and fair elections, particularly with regard to speed, security, finance and the need for an extensive code of conduct monitored by a strong and independent electoral supervisory body. There was also widespread acceptance of the necessity to correct the gross under-representation of opposition parties produced by the electoral system.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 MAURITIUS This File Contains Election Results for the National
    MAURITIUS This file contains election results for the National Assembly of Mauritius in 1967, 1976, 1982, 1983, 1987, 1991, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2014. YEAR Election Year CON_NAME Constituency Name CON_NO Constituency Number VALID Valid Votes Parti Mauricien Social Democrate (Social Democratic Mauritian Party) PMSD_N1 Candidate #1 Name PMSD_C1 Candidate #1 Community PMSD_V1 Candidate #1 Votes PMSD_N2 Candidate #2 Name PMSD_C2 Candidate #2 Community PMSD_V2 Candidate #2 Votes PMSD_N3 Candidate #3 Name PMSD_C3 Candidate #3 Community PMSD_V3 Candidate #3 Votes PMSD_N4 Candidate #4 Name PMSD_C4 Candidate #4 Community PMSD_V4 Candidate #4 Votes Independence Party IP_N1 Candidate #1 Name IP_C1 Candidate #1 Community IP_V1 Candidate #1 Votes IP_N2 Candidate #2 Name IP_C2 Candidate #2 Community IP_V2 Candidate #2 Votes IP_N3 Candidate #3 Name IP_C3 Candidate #3 Community IP_V3 Candidate #3 Votes IP_N4 Candidate #4 Name IP_C4 Candidate #4 Community IP_V4 Candidate #4 Votes IP_N5 Candidate #5 Name IP_C5 Candidate #5 Community IP_V5 Candidate #5 Votes National Socialist Workers Party NSWP_N1 Candidate #1 Name NSWP_C1 Candidate #1 Community NSWP_V1 Candidate #1 Votes NSWP_N2 Candidate #2 Name NSWP_C2 Candidate #2 Community 1 NSWP_V2 Candidate #2 Votes NSWP_N3 Candidate #3 Name NSWP_C3 Candidate #3 Community NSWP_V3 Candidate #3 Votes Mauritius Young Communist League MYCL_N1 Candidate #1 Name NYCL_C1 Candidate #1 Community MYCL_V1 Candidate #1 Votes Mauritius Liberation Front MLF_N1 Candidate #1 Name MLF_C1 Candidate #1 Community MLF_V1 Candidate
    [Show full text]
  • Dimpho Motsamai
    EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR ELECTORAL SUPPORT ESN - SA ELECTORAL SUPPORT NETWORK IN SOUTHERN AFRICA Democratic Republic of Congo United Republic PREVENTING AND of MITIGATINGTanzania ELECTORAL CONFLICTSeychelles Angola AND VIOLENCEMozambique Zambia Malawi Mauritius Madagascar ZimbabweFabio Bargiacchi, Victoria Florinder Editors Namibia Botswana Kondwani Chirambo, Thibaud Kurtz Co-editors Swaziland South Africa Lesotho Funded 75% by The European Union and 25% by The European Centre for Electoral Support Table of Content FOREWORD 2 PREFACE 7 INTRODUCTION 10 CHAPTER I - ELECTORAL CONFLICT PREVENTION FRAMEWORK 16 Handbook Purpose and Goal 17 Defining Election Related Conflict and Research Framework 19 A Regional Journey About Preventing Electoral Violence 19 Early Warning 28 CHAPTER II - CASE STUDIES 30 Regional SADC and Botswana / Kondwani Chirambo 31 Angola / Celestino Onesimo Setucula 61 Democratic Republic of the Congo / Robert Gerenge 76 Lesotho / Victor Shale 101 Madagascar / Juvence Ramasy 128 Malawi / Henry Chingaipe 148 Mauritius / Catherine Boudet 180 Mozambique / Johanna Nilsson 205 Namibia / Maximilian Weiland 230 South Africa / Dimpho Motsamai 255 Swaziland / Lungile Mnisi 278 United Republic of Tanzania and Zanzibar / Andrew Mushi and Alexander Makulilo 303 Zambia / Lee Habasonda 326 Zimbabwe / Jestina Mukoko 350 CHAPTER III - CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 378 Key Findings for the Region 379 Shared Regional Issues from the Case Studies 379 Regional Issues 382 Unique National Issues with Potential for Regional Focus 382 Conclusions 384
    [Show full text]