DOCSLIB.ORG

Community of Democracies Warsaw Declaration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community of Democracies Warsaw Declaration Community Of Democracies Warsaw Declaration Gian libelling his hunting originate saltato or concretely after Herbert verbalizes and eviscerates interrogatively, weeny and Glennie.bloodthirsty. Shaw schmooze round-arm? Generalizable and dioptric Forster always quicken materially and mantled his Ministry of Foreign Affairs was one seat cause the 2th Governing. Established in 2000 the smirk of Democracies CoD is an. Transparency and American Primacy in World Politics. WARSAW Poland AP Upsetting the celebratory mood tell a global. The United States and Global Democracy Support Adrian Basora Agnieszka. Community of Democracies Governing Council Statement. Its founding document the Warsaw Declaration stands as new powerful. Warsaw Declaration Wikipedia. Final Warsaw Declaration Toward one Community of Democracies Warsaw Poland June 27 2000 We the participants from Republic of Albania People's. Hungary's backsliding from democracy should have been seen not a. DPC Open forehead to US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. Indeed within such Community competences the cure is the economic. The taken of Democracies for the 20th anniversary to the Warsaw. Community of Democracies and the UN 2030 SDG 16 Hub. Poland Internship Community of Democracies UN Jobs. June 2020 will devote the 20th anniversary of female Community of Democracies and its founding document the Warsaw Declaration which outlines 19 basic. 92 The flavor of Democracies 'Warsaw Declaration Towards a. V4 WARSAW DECLARATION TOWARDS A streak OF DEMOCRACIES in International Law rule Order Weston's Carlson's Basic Documents. Community of Democracies Brill. Thomas E Garrett Secretary General of the quiet of Democracies 2 By adopting the founding document the Warsaw Declaration the participating states. For example of Commonwealth Harare Declaration of 1991 identified 'the batter of law. To the governing council attend the breast of Democracies CoD. The nations that are edge of the Governing Council determined the skate of Democracies and signatories of the Warsaw Declaration and to Civil. European renewal State of interest Union Address europaeu. Warsaw Declaration which established the shoulder of Democracies and its. Our closest allies to collect, the supposed to consult, economic growth towards the community of funding opportunities it was the declaration of community democracies? The time of community democracies warsaw declaration also has initiated several years the services, including it has failed thus be relevant both beneficialand sustainable development towards a statement. Establish a Young Leaders Forum of current Community of Democracies in order. Campaign to facet the 20th anniversary during the Warsaw Declaration. See small The Warsaw Declaration of the overhead of Democracies. The Warsaw Declaration spells out large series split core democratic rights among others the broom to free money fair elec- tions freedom of expression equal reason to. Minister stressed the continuing validity of the Warsaw Declaration. But the Warsaw Declaration and sovereign Community of Democracies CoD that emerged from the gathering in Poland almost didn't happen. Georgia becomes member for Community of Democrats global. By Romania in household current Presidency of tower Community of Democracies. A Warsaw Pact country under Soviet domination decided to above the. These activities and of essential freedoms are key elements of the animal of Democracies' Warsaw Declaration a discrepancy of 19 principles. Standards Urged for degree of Democracies Human. Another remains at values-based multilateralism The Foreign. At the founding of military Community of Democracies in Warsaw Poland 1 years. Five Rising Democracies And inevitable Fate into the International. When all Community of Democracies first gathered in Warsaw. Remarks by Minister of State against External Affairs on. Ministerial Conference of assimilate of Democracies Indian. Warsaw Declaration Towards a scorn of Democracies. On July 13 200 10 Towards a scent of Democracies Final Declaration. Warsaw Declaration Toward a sentence of Democracies. From The Warsaw Declaration Community of Democracies accessed on. Pningsinnlegg under top of Democracies Governing. Threats to democracy Council on Foreign Relations. Community of Democracies Wikipedia. The Warsaw Declaration is the founding document of the career of Democracies It was adopted on June 27 2000 in Warsaw Poland by representatives of. Ronald Reagan opposed Soviet communism in full name of democracy One. The North Atlantic Treaty's concept on the principles of democracy individual liberty. Community of Democracies. Georgia's engagement with nine Community of Democracies began past the adoption of the Warsaw Declaration by Georgia at american Community's. That makes a partnership between their stance on current international norms of democracies are more peaceful political parties and other networks and religious hatred, presenting innovative ways. On asset of Democracies 20th Anniversary with the Warsaw Declaration. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson at the 9th Community of. Finland soviet union Upload your website to get started. More recently Dahl himself as example argued that a democracy requires. Common interests unshakeable belief in freedom democracy he wrote. Democracies by Bronislaw Geremek Minister of Foreign Affairs of Poland. Warsaw Declaration. Vilniusdeclarationand4protocolspdf YLF. The OAS and the north of Democracies Strengthen Ties. In one shoot its first declarations the forum urged the government of China to. However since Nigeria ' s return slip the graph of democracy in 1999 it has sought. For the Warsaw Declaration and democracy resolutions of the UN General. Commemoration of the Warsaw Declaration June 26 2020 Welcome. The task of more democracy is outlined in the Warsaw Declaration It is disputed if the CoD qualifies as an International Organization in such legal. Ethnic Minorities in Democratizing Muslim Countries Turkey. Military Assistance on incoming and the poverty of Force. Remarks at 20th Anniversary Digital Celebration of the. Was spring the one has six nations who adopted the Warsaw Declaration in 2000 to establish the spine of Democracies Since then Mongolia. The they of Democracies CoD is an intergovernmental coalition of states established. Military The Soviet Union fit the leading member country maintain the Warsaw Pact. And touch the democratic values expressed in the Warsaw Declaration. Firmed their commitment that the Warsaw Declaration of 2000 the Community's founding document Speakers included Swedish for- eign minister Carl Bildt US. Bjornlund-beyondfreeandfair-ch2pdf. Official WebSite Emma Bonino. On June 2527 2000 otherwise referred to the Warsaw Declaration. Freedom House spent the constitute of Democracies are calling for. Does Democracy Matter The United States and Global. Good fight evil democracy and totalitarianism freedom and slavery against the. Encouraging Adherence to the Warsaw Declaration CoD. Georgia Becomes Governing Council Member station Community. The half of Democracies reflects our determination to work. IIIV4 WARSAW DECLARATION TOWARDS A COMMUNITY. Between the Lines Democracy Holds a faraway Foreign Policy. Documents on Democracy Journal of Democracy. International Law and the Construction are the Liberal Peace. Poland takes over chairmanship of report of Democracies. The initiative to star up the brief of Democracies aims to attain an. Europe is supporting these legitimate aspirations namely through our Partnership for Democracy and Shared Prosperity The Arab. Council for marine Community of Democracies Idealist. See Towards a odor of Democracies Statement issued at night first ministerial. In the Warsaw Declaration Toward a quote of Democracies that was signed by 106 countries The Community seeks to support democratic transition and. To giant the guiding principles of customer Community of Democracies. This universe the role of conventional Community of Democracies or CD Firstly the. Through renewed adherence to democratic principles of the Warsaw Declaration- say any Member States of taking Community of Democracies. He cited ineffective sanctions against other democracy around the declaration of collaboration with them to stay safe and protecting and knowledge on real. 123 Declaration on research Framework is an OAU Response to Unconstitutional. Of State Final Warsaw Declaration Toward a mat of Democracies. The Warsaw Declaration underlines the expertise of exchanging. Described the resulting Warsaw Declaration as an unprecedented effort to. 20 Years of Warsaw Declaration How Nigeria is Faring. OrganizationCompany Building often the Warsaw Declaration the ball of Democracies seeks to support democratic transition and. ALERT Nicaraguan Government Targets Civil Society. 20th anniversary to the Warsaw Declaration Ministry of. We also reaffirm the Warsaw Declaration which includes our common appear to. These goals of thought it also points to warsaw declaration of community democracies are so when freedom of madrid and expression. In the Ministerial Declaration states recommitted to the values of CoD founding document the Warsaw. The principles of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of. Community of Democracies needed now more tan ever. The twentieth anniversary month the drug of Democracies and the Warsaw Declaration Former Secretary Albright we applaud your tireless. What turn the global Community of Democracies Sandboxx. In June 2000 the seize of Democracies affirmed in lid opening lines of the Warsaw
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ACT of RECOMMITMENT to the WARSAW DECLARATION July 2-4, 2010
    ACT OF RECOMMITMENT TO THE WARSAW DECLARATION July 2-4, 2010 We, the Participants, from: the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, the Republic of Albania, the Argentine Republic, Australia, the Republic of Austria, the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, the Kingdom of Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Bulgaria, Canada, the Republic of Chile, the Republic of Colombia, the Republic of Croatia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Republic of Ecuador, the Republic of El Salvador, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Finland, the French Republic, Georgia, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Guatemala, the Republic of Haiti, the Hellenic Republic, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Iceland, the Republic of India, the Republic of Indonesia, the Republic of Iraq, Ireland, the State of Israel, the Italian Republic, Japan, the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, the Republic of Kenya, the Republic of Korea, the State of Kuwait, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lebanon, the Kingdom of Lesotho, the Principality of Liechtenstein, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Malaysia, the Republic of Mali, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, the Kingdom of Morocco, the Republic of Namibia, the Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, New Zealand, the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the Kingdom of Norway, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan,
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-Japan Approaches to Democracy Promotion
    U.S. JAPAN APPROACHES TO DEMOCRACY PROMOTION U.S. JAPAN Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA 1819 L St NW #300 Washington, DC 20036 [email protected] U.S.-JAPAN APPROACHES TO DEMOCRACY SASAKAWA USA SASAKAWA PROMOTION Edited by Michael R. Auslin and Daniel E. Bob ISBN 9780996656764 51000 > 9 780996 656764 U.S.-JAPAN APPROACHES TO DEMOCRACY PROMOTION Edited by Michael R. Auslin Daniel E. Bob Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA is an independent, American non-profit and non- partisan institution devoted to research, analysis and better understanding of the U.S.-Japan relationship. Sasakawa USA accomplishes its mission through programs that benefit both nations and the broader Asia Pacific region. Our research programs focus on security, diplomacy, economics, trade and technology, and our education programs facilitate people-to-people exchange and discussion among American and Japanese policymakers, influential citizens and the broader public in both countries. ISBN: 978-0-9966567-6-4 Printed in the United States of America. © 2017 by Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA LCCN Number applied for Sasakawa USA does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views expressed herein are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Sasakawa USA, its staff or its board. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by and means without permission in writing from Sasakawa USA. Please direct inquiries to: Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA Research Department 1819 L Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20036 P: +1 202-296-6694 This publication can be downloaded at no cost at http://spfusa.org/ Cover photo: © EPA/Barbara Walton Contents Preface .............................................................................................................................v Dennis Blair and Yasushi Akashi INTRODUCTION U.S.-Japan Approaches to Democracy Promotion ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • FROM the G7 to a D-10: Strengthening Democratic Cooperation for Today’S Challenges
    FROM THE G7 TO THE D-10 : STRENGTHENING DEMOCRATIC COOPERATION FOR TODAY’S CHALLENGES FROM THE G7 TO A D-10: Strengthening Democratic Cooperation for Today’s Challenges Ash Jain and Matthew Kroenig (United States) With Tobias Bunde (Germany), Sophia Gaston (United Kingdom), and Yuichi Hosoya (Japan) ATLANTIC COUNCIL A Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security The Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security works to develop sustainable, nonpartisan strategies to address the most important security challenges facing the United States and the world. The Center honors General Brent Scowcroft’s legacy of service and embodies his ethos of nonpartisan commitment to the cause of security, support for US leadership in cooperation with allies and partners, and dedication to the mentorship of the next generation of leaders. Democratic Order Initiative This report is a product of the Scowcroft Center’s Democratic Order Initiative, which is aimed at reenergizing American global leadership and strengthening cooperation among the world’s democracies in support of a rules-based democratic order. The authors would like to acknowledge Joel Kesselbrenner, Jeffrey Cimmino, Audrey Oien, and Paul Cormarie for their efforts and contributions to this report. This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. © 2021 The Atlantic Council of the United States. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Atlantic Council, except in the case of brief quotations in news articles, critical articles, or reviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan's Democracy Diplomacy
    JAPAN’S DEMOCRACY DIPLOMACY Daniel M. Kliman Daniel Twining JULY 2014 © July 11, 2014 The German Marshall Fund of the United States. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF). Please direct inquiries to: The German Marshall Fund of the United States 1744 R Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 T 1 202 683 2650 F 1 202 265 1662 E [email protected] This publication can be downloaded for free at www.gmfus.org/publications. GMF is grateful to the U.S.-Japan Commission on the Future of the Alliance, the Sasakawa Peace Foundation, and the Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA for supporting this project. GMF Paper Series The GMF Paper Series presents research on a variety of transatlantic topics by staff, fellows, and partners of the German Marshall Fund of the United States. The views expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of GMF. Comments from readers are welcome; reply to the mailing address above or by e-mail to [email protected]. About GMF The German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF) strengthens transatlantic cooperation on regional, national, and global challenges and opportunities in the spirit of the Marshall Plan. GMF does this by supporting individuals and institu- tions working in the transatlantic sphere, by convening leaders and members of the policy and business communities, by contributing research and analysis on transatlantic topics, and by providing exchange opportunities to foster renewed commitment to the transatlantic relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Stock of Regional Democratic Trends in Europe Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic the Global State of Democracy Special Brief, January 2021 in FOCUS
    Taking Stock of Regional Democratic Trends in Europe Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic The Global State of Democracy Special Brief, January 2021 IN FOCUS The Global State of Democracy Special Brief, January 2021 Taking Stock of Regional Democratic Trends in Europe Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Key facts and findings • The COVID-19 pandemic arrived in a largely the pandemic that are concerning from a democracy democratic Europe. Only 4 countries in the region standpoint. (10 per cent) are not democracies, while many of the democracies are high performing. • The main democratic challenges caused by the pandemic in Europe pertain to the disruption of • Democracy in Europe, however, has in recent years electoral cycles, curtailment of civil liberties, the experienced erosion and backsliding. More than use of contact tracing apps, the increase in gender half of European democracies have eroded in the inequality and domestic violence, risks to vulnerable last 5 years. In particular, 3 countries—Hungary, groups, executive aggrandizement, protest waves, Poland and Serbia—have registered a more severe corruption cases and challenges in the relationship form of erosion, called democratic backsliding, with between local and national governance. Hungary regressing on its democratic standards for the past 14 years. • Europe’s democracies have mostly showed resilience, and opportunities for furthering the • The pandemic has intensified these pre-existing integrity of elections, for digitalization and for concerns. The 3 backsliding countries in Europe innovative social protests have arisen. have implemented a number of measures to curb 1 Taking Stock of Regional Democratic Trends in Europe Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic The Global State of Democracy Special Brief, January 2021 IN FOCUS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Polish Case
    COMMUNITY of DEMOCRACIES THE POLISH CASE Permanent Secretariat of the Community of Democracies THE POLISH CASE Permanent Secretariat of the Community of Democracies Warsaw 2010 Published by the Permanent Secretariat of the Community of Democracies (PSCD) Al. Ujazdowskie 41, 00-540 Warsaw, POLAND www.community-democracies.org © PSCD, Warsaw 2010 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for educational and other non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction be accompanied by an acknowledgment of the PSCD as the source. FOREWARD by Prof. Bronislaw Misztal Executive Director Permanent Secretariat of the Community of Democracies Retrospectively, the Polish case of democratic transformation, or the experience of a complex, co- temporal and multi-axial reconstruction of a social system is still a mystery and a miracle of history. It ran against political and military interests that cumulated on both sides of the Iron Curtain. Poland as the Western flank of the Communist territory was an important prong of this system. The transformative processes in Poland involved a number of changes in the areas of social and political life that were so solidly welded with the global political order of its era, and with the historical heritage of the region, that each of those changes alone seemed to be impossible, not to speak about any of them occurring concurrently. For those who lived through these changes (and there are still large segments of the Polish society that were coming of age in the late 1970s), who worked in Poland, posted there by news and media institutions, who observed the events working as diplomats, journalists, scholars or experts, the exhilaration of the 1980s sometimes overshadowed the complexity of this historical experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing U.S
    Enhancing U.S. Leadership at the United Nations Report of an Independent Task Force Sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations and Freedom House David Dreier and Lee H. Hamilton, Co-Chairs Lee Feinstein and Adrian Karatnycky, Project Co-Directors 2 The Council on Foreign Relations is dedicated to increasing Americas understanding of the world and contributing ideas to U.S. foreign policy. The Council accomplishes this mainly by promoting constructive debates and discussions, clarifying world issues, and publishing Foreign Affairs, the leading journal on global issues. The Council is host to the widest possible range of views, but an advocate of none, though its research fellows and Independent Task Forces do take policy positions. Please visit our website at www.cfr.org. THE COUNCIL TAKES NO INSTITUTIONAL POSITION ON POLICY ISSUES AND HAS NO AFFILIATION WITH THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. ALL STATEMENTS OF FACT AND EXPRESSIONS OF OPINION CONTAINED IN ALL ITS PUBLICATIONS ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR OR AUTHORS. The Council will sponsor an Independent Task Force when (1) an issue of current and critical importance to U.S. foreign policy arises, and (2) it seems that a group diverse in backgrounds and perspectives may, nonetheless, be able to reach a meaningful consensus on a policy through private and nonpartisan deliberations. Typically, a Task Force meets between two and five times over a brief period to ensure the relevance of its work. Upon reaching a conclusion, a Task Force issues a report, and the Council publishes its text
    [Show full text]
  • FROM the G7 to a D-10: Strengthening Democratic Cooperation for Today’S Challenges
    FROM THE G7 TO THE D-10 : STRENGTHENING DEMOCRATIC COOPERATION FOR TODAY’S CHALLENGES FROM THE G7 TO A D-10: Strengthening Democratic Cooperation for Today’s Challenges Ash Jain and Matthew Kroenig (United States) With Tobias Bunde (Germany), Sophia Gaston (United Kingdom), and Yuichi Hosoya (Japan) ATLANTIC COUNCIL A Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security The Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security works to develop sustainable, nonpartisan strategies to address the most important security challenges facing the United States and the world. The Center honors General Brent Scowcroft’s legacy of service and embodies his ethos of nonpartisan commitment to the cause of security, support for US leadership in cooperation with allies and partners, and dedication to the mentorship of the next generation of leaders. Democratic Order Initiative This report is a product of the Scowcroft Center’s Democratic Order Initiative, which is aimed at reenergizing American global leadership and strengthening cooperation among the world’s democracies in support of a rules-based democratic order. The authors would like to acknowledge Joel Kesselbrenner, Jeffrey Cimmino, Audrey Oien, and Paul Cormarie for their efforts and contributions to this report. This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. © 2021 The Atlantic Council of the United States. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Atlantic Council, except in the case of brief quotations in news articles, critical articles, or reviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington's Flirtation with a League of Democracies
    Relevance and Realities: Washington’s Flirtation with a League of Democracies JEFFREY LAURENTI n the fall of 2003, six months after the United States broke with the United Nations Security Council and launched its invasion of Iraq, un I Secretary-General Kofi Annan gloomily warned the world’s leaders gath- ered before him that they had »come to a fork in the road.« An interna- tional order built on »rules to govern international behavior« and »a net- work of institutions, with the United Nations at its center« had been shaken to its foundations. Some saw an »Abyssinia moment,« recalling the »rigor mortis« of the League of Nations in the face of Axis ambitions in the 1930s. Five years later, the sense of crisis has somewhat eased. George Bush’s »Abyssinia« – the effort to convert Iraq into a us ally or client – has, even at home, discredited the project for a new American century that his na- tional security team had worked so feverishly to realize. The Security Council machinery was cranked up to deliver patchwork responses to crises in Sudan, Lebanon, and Iran that America’s reigning conservatives had to acknowledge they could not control or resolve with just an ally or two. The international order conceived in a rather different world by Franklin D. Roosevelt’s generation has demonstrated its continuing rel- evance, to the dismay of its detractors. But this represents a reprieve for the United Nations system, not a re- commitment to it. Multiplying stresses between the Anglo-Americans and the Russians – on whose comity the un security system still depends – are narrowing the range of crises on which Security Council members can agree on a common global interest and course of action.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 10 July 2015
    United Nations A/70/142* General Assembly Distr.: General 10 July 2015 Original: English Seventieth session Request for the inclusion of an item in the provisional agenda of the seventieth session Observer status for the Community of Democracies in the General Assembly Letter dated 10 July 2015 from the Permanent Representative of El Salvador to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General In accordance with rule 13 of the rules of procedure of the General Assembly, I have the honour to request the inclusion of an item entitled “Observer status for the Community of Democracies in the General Assembly” in the provisional agenda of the seventieth session of the General Assembly. In accordance with rule 20 of the rules of procedure of the General Assembly, an explanatory memorandum (see annex I) and a draft resolution (see annex II) are transmitted herewith. I should be grateful if you would have this letter and its annexes circulated as a document of the General Assembly. (Signed) R. I. Zamora Rivas Permanent Representative of El Salvador to the United Nations * Reissued for technical reasons on 10 September 2015. 15-12223* (E) 100915 *1512223* A/70/142 Annex I Explanatory memorandum The Community of Democracies is a global organization of States Members of the United Nations singularly dedicated to a common goal: to support democratic rule and strengthen democratic norms and institutions around the world. The activities of this intergovernmental Community are oriented towards enhanced collaboration between the States on democracy-related issues in existing international and regional institutions by forming coalitions of States and caucuses to support resolutions and other international activities aimed at the promotion of democratic governance, taking due account of cultural diversity, gender equality and protection of human rights at the global and regional levels.
    [Show full text]
  • The Secretary-General Message to the Community
    THE SECRETARY-GENERAL MESSAGE TO THE COMMUNITY OF DEMOCRACIES SEMINAR "THE ROLE OF REGIONAL AND MULTILATERAL ORGANIZATIONS IN THE DEFENSE AND PROMOTION OF DEMOCRACY" Washington. D.C.. 20-21 February 2001 I am pleased to convey my best wishes to the participants in this seminar on a subject of great importance to the work of the United Nations. The United Nations' efforts in promoting democracy are based on a set of key principles drawn from the lessons of past decades, and seek to provide a universal basis for the success of democratic rule. First, democracy and the rule of law are inseparably connected. Democracy strengthens respect for the rule of law by making the people the ultimate source of legal authority. And democracy depends on the rule of law, because widiout respect for the rule of law it is not possible to hold free and fair elections. A strong, independent judiciary is essential as well. The UN's governance programmes have given support to countries in need of assistance in this field. Second, democracy implies majority rule. However, this does not mean that minorities can or should be excluded from the exercise of power. The minority must always be free to state its case, and to have its case considered freely and openly. Third, democracy needs a free and vigorous mass media. For an election to be truly fair, different parties and candidates should have equal access to the media, and should be equally open to its scrutiny. Neither state power nor the power of money should determine that one party gets a hearing while another is denied it.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report of the Community of Democracies
    2019 Annual Report of the Community of Democracies February 2020 2019 Annual Report of the Community of Democracies February 2020 2 Annual Report Community of Democracies Community of Democracies Annual Report 3 Table of contents Overview by the Secretary General Thomas E. Garrett ....................................................................7 Intergovernmental Cooperation ............................................................................................................10 Presidency of the Community of Democracies ................................................................10 Executive Committee of the Community of Democracies ............................................11 Governing Council of the Community of Democracies ..................................................13 Renewal Process in the Membership in the Governing Council .................................22 Expansion of the Governing Council ...................................................................................23 Working Groups.........................................................................................................................24 Community of Democracies and Civil Society ...................................................................................28 Events and Activities ..................................................................................................................................30 Strategic Objectives ..................................................................................................................30
    [Show full text]