DOCSLIB.ORG

Edward J. Balleisen Fraud: an American History from Barnum to Madoff

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Edward J. Balleisen Fraud: an American History from Barnum to Madoff Edward J. Balleisen Fraud: An American History from Barnum to Madoff A Companion Bibliography Primary Sources Archival Collections Chicago History Museum. Better Business Bureau of Metropolitan Chicago Records, ca. 1929–2003. Denver Public Library. Dan Bell Papers. Duke University. Paris Cleveland Gardner Papers, David M. Rubinstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library. Harvard University. Louis E. Kirstein Collection, Historical Collections, Baker Library, Harvard Business School. National Archives. Fraud Order Case Files and Fraud Order Hearings, Records of the Post Office Department, Record Group 28, Entries 50 and 55. New York City Better Business Bureau. Historical Clippings Files. New York Stock Exchange Archives. Records on Stock Frauds. Rutgers Library. Consumers Research Papers, Special Collections Library. Books and Reports Acid Truths about the Better Business Bureau of Saint Louis. St. Louis, 1930. Annotation and Cases on What Constitutes False, Misleading, or Deceptive Advertising or Promotional Practices. Rochester, 1959. Fraud and Fair Dealing in Stocks! New York, 1880. The Highly Interesting and Important Trial of Dr. T.W. Dyott. Philadelphia, 1839. The Rogues and Rogueries of New York. New York, 1865. The Stock Privilege Rig: A Thorough Exposure of a Fascinating Fraud. Brooklyn, 1875 Affiliated Better Business Bureaus. A Guide for Retail Store Advertising. Boston, 1932. Alabama State Office of Consumer Protection. Annual Reports. American Association of Retired Persons, A Report on the Survey of Older Consumer Behavior. Washington, DC, 1990. American Medical Association. Medical Mail Order Frauds. Chicago, 1915. Andreas, Alfred. History of Chicago, vol. 3. Chicago, 1886. Associated Advertising Clubs of the World. The Most Dangerous Enemy of the Oil Industry. New York, 1919. Association of Better Business Bureaus. A Guide for Retail Advertising and Selling. New York, 1956. Attorney General of the State of New York. Annual Reports. Better Business Bureau of Los Angeles. Second Annual Report. Los Angeles, 1931. Better Business Bureau of St. Louis. Telling the Public. St. Louis, 1926. Bennett, DeRobigne M. The Champions of the Church: Their Crimes and Persecutions. New York, 1878. Bennett, DeRobigne M. The World’s Sages, Thinkers, and Reformers. New York, 1876. Bigelow, Melville M. The Law of Fraud and the Procedure Pertaining the Redress Thereof, 2 vols. Boston, 1877. Bishop, James, Jr. and Henry W. Hubbard. Let the Seller Beware. Washington, DC, 1968. Blackstone, William. Commentaries on the Laws of England, 12th ed. London, 1795. Boardman, Henry A. The Bible in the Counting-House. Philadelphia, 1853. Bolton, J. H. The Rogues and Rogueries of New York. New York, 1865. Brooks, John. Once in Golconda: A True Story of Wall Street, 1920–1938. New York, 1968. Browne, Edward F. Socialism or Empire: A Danger. Omaha, 1906. Busch, Moritz. Wanderungen zwischen die Hudson und Mississippi 1851 und 1852. Stuttgart, 1854. California State Department of Consumer Affairs, Annual Reports. California State Department of Education, California Basic Adult Education: Examples of Lesson Plans in Elementary Subjects for Adults. Sacramento, 1972. California State Department of Justice, What to Do When You Have Been Cheated. Sacramento, 1965. California Trial Lawyers Association, How Not to Be Cheated and Who to Contact If You Are. Sacramento, 1972. Calkins, Earnest Elmo and Ralph Holden. Modern Advertising. New York, 1905. Callan, John F. The Military Laws of the United States. Philadelphia, 1863. Chapman, Clowry. The Law of Advertising and Sales and Related Business Law, vol. 1. Denver, 1908. Chynoweth James B. and William H. Bruckner. American Manures; and Farmers’ and Planters’ Guide. Philadelphia, 1871. Clews, Henry. Twenty-Eight Years in Wall Street: Fraud and Fair Dealing in Stocks! An Exposé. New York, 1888. Coleman, George S. “Public Service Commissions,” in Some Legal Phases of Corporate Financing, Reorganization, and Regulation. New York, 1916. Columbus Better Business Bureau. Annual Report. Columbus, 1929. Columbus BBB. The Pig Squeals! Columbus, 1934. Comstock, Anthony. Frauds Exposed; or, How the People Are Deceived and Robbed, and Youth Corrupted, Being a Full Exposure of Various Schemes Operated through the Mails. New York, 1880. Conyngton, Hugh R. Financing an Enterprise, Vol III: The Financing. New York, 1923. Cormier, Frank. Wall Street’s Shady Side. Washington, DC, 1962. Council of Better Business Bureaus. Challenge to American Business. New York, 1971. Cushing, Marshall. The Story of Our Post Office. Boston, 1893. Dana, Charles A. Recollections of the Civil War. New York, 1899. Dewey, Charles S. Federal Cooperation to Prevent Fraud. St. Louis, 1926. Dicey, Albert Venn. Lectures Introductory to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. London, 1886. Dickens, Charles. American Notes for General Circulation, Vol. 2. London, 1842. Earling, Peter R. Whom to Trust: A Treatise on Mercantile Credit. Chicago, 1890. Eddy, Arthur Jerome. The New Competition, 4th edition. New York, 1920. Ellison, E. Jerome and Frank W. Brock. The Run for Your Money. New York, 1935. Facts You Should Know about Your Better Business Bureau: Public Service in the Public Interest. New York, n.d. Federal Trade Commission. Guide against Bait Advertising. Washington, D.C. 1959. Federal Trade Commission. Guides against Deceptive Advertising of Guarantees. Washington, D.C., 1960. Federal Trade Commission. Guides against Deceptive Pricing. Washington, D.C., 1958. Federal Trade Commission. Annual Reports. Field, John. Personality: An Address to the 5th Annual Convention of the NACM. New York, 1900. Flynn, John T. Investment Trusts Gone Wrong! New York, 1930. Foster, George G. New York in Slices. New York, 1849. Fowler, William W. Twenty Years of Inside Life in Wall Street. New York, 1880. Freedley, Edward T. Money: How to Get, How to Keep, and How to Use It. London, 1853. Galbraith, John Kenneth. The Great Crash: 1929. New York, 1961. Giles, Alfred E. Societies for the Suppression of Vice: Are They Beneficial or Injurious? Boston, 1883. Grannan, Joseph C. Grannan’s Warning against Fraud. Cincinnati, 1889. Greene, Asa. The Perils of Pearl Street: Including a Taste of the Dangers of Wall Street. New York, 1834. Greene, Edward L. Activities of the National Better Business Bureau, 1927–28. New York, 1928. Harrington, Bates. How ’Tis Done: A Thorough Ventilation of the Numerous Schemes Conducted by Wandering Canvassers, Together with the Various Advertising Dodges for the Swindling of the Public. Chicago, 1879. Henderson, Gerald C. The Federal Trade Commission: A Study in Administrative Law and Procedure. New York, 1924. Herbert, Henry William. Tricks and Traps of Chicago. New York, 1859. Herbert, Henry William. Tricks and Traps of New York City. Boston, 1857. Hill, John, Jr. Gold Bricks of Speculation: A Study of Speculation and Its Counterfeits, and an Exposé of the Methods of Bucketshop and “Get-Rich-Quick” Swindles. Chicago, 1904. Holbrook, James. Ten Years Among the Mail Bags. New York, 1856. Holton, J. H. The Rogues and Rogueries of New York. New York, 1865. Hord, Wirt D. Lost Dollars: or, The Pirates of Promotion. Cincinnati, 1924. Johnson, Samuel W. Essays on Peat, Muck, and Commercial Manures. Hartford, 1859. Kansas City Better Business Bureau. Protecting Legitimate Business and the Public: 1928 Annual Report. Kansas City, 1928. Kenner, H. J. Business Self-Discipline. New York, 1927. Kenner, H. J. The Fight for Truth in Advertising: A Story of What Business Has Done and Is Doing to Establish and Maintain Accuracy and Fair Play in Advertising and Selling for the Public's Protection. New York, 1936. Kenner, H. J. You and the Integrity of Business: An Address to the Rotary Club of New York. New York, 1929. Koester, Frank. The Price of Inefficiency. New York, 1913. Lawson, Thomas W. Frenzied Finance: The Crime of Amalgamated. New York, 1905. Lee, Alfred McClung. The Daily Newspaper in America. New York, 1937. Leech, D. D. T. List of the Post Offices in the United States. Washington, DC, 1857. Lefevre, Edwin. Reminiscences of a Stock Operator. New York, 1923. Lewis, Edward G. Order Number Ten: Being Cursory Comments on Some of the Effects of the Great American Fraud Order. St. Louis, 1911. Loss, Louis and Edward M. Cowett. Blue Sky Law. Boston, 1958. Mack, Ruth P. Controlling Retailers: A Study of Cooperation and Control in the Retail Trade with Special Reference to the NRA. New York, 1936. Madden, Edwin C. The U.S. Government’s Shame: The Story of the Great Lewis Case. Detroit, 1908. Manhattan Board of Commerce. Do Better Business Bureaus Better Business? New York, 1930. Mapes, Dorchester. Why I Am a Member! New York, 1900. Margolius, Sidney. Buyer, Be Wary! New York, 1965. McCall, John A. The Regulation of Life Insurance in the United States and Foreign Countries. New Haven, 1904. Meagher, Thomas Francis. The Commercial Agency “System” of the United States and Canada Exposed: Is the Secret Inquisition a Curse or a Benefit? New York, 1876. Medbury, James K. Men and Mysteries of Wall Street. Boston, 1870. Melville, Herman. The Confidence-Man: His Masquerade. London, 1857. Morford, Henry. The Days of Shoddy. New York, 1863. Morse, Sidney. The Siege of University City: The Dreyfus Case of America. University City, MO, 1912. National Association of Credit Men. About the National Fund for Credit Protection. New York, 1925. National Association of Credit Men. Commerce and the Credit Crook. New York, 1925. New Jersey Center for Consumer Education, Selected Audio-Visual Materials for Consumer Education. Edison, NJ, 1974. New York City Better Business Bureau. The Record: Recounting the Advertising Price Claims of R. H. Macy & Company, Inc., and the Position of the Better Business Bureau of New York City, Inc., in Respect Thereto. New York, 1926. New York City Better Business Bureau. Blocking the Return of the Stock Swindler. New York, 1933. New York City Better Business Bureau. Facts, Then Action: A Merchandise Report, 1925–1930. New York, 1930. New York City Better Business Bureau. Helping Business and the NRA. New York, 1933. New York City Better Business Bureau. Safeguarding the Integrity of Business.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comment Letter on File No. S7-12-06
    1 Nancy Morris 8/29/06 Secretary Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, DC RE: Amendments to Regulation SHO (Release No. 34-54154 File No. S7-12-06) Ms. Morris and SEC Commissioners, My name is Dr. Jim DeCosta and I thank you for this opportunity to comment on these much-needed amendments to Reg SHO. In studying the 51-page circular attached to the proposed amendments I can see that the SEC has put in a great deal of time and thought into this process and your efforts have been duly noted by the investment community and are greatly appreciated. On the other hand though I see that there are those among you that still don’t appreciate the pandemic nature of this systemic “Fraud on the market” or the emergent nature of it as victimized corporations are drowning today in a sea of unaddressed and archaic delivery failures. These unaddressed delivery failures have in turn procreated often unexercisable “Share entitlements” that nearly all investors believe to be legitimate “Shares” that they can vote and receive tax preferential treatment of cash dividends from. Nothing could be further from the truth, however, yet these mere “Share entitlements” are readily sellable as if they were legitimate shares and are capable of inflicting massive dilutional damage upon the share structures of targeted corporations when their numbers and their lifespan are not scrutinized meticulously and kept in check as per the Congressional Mandate of the DTCC management. I’d like to make some suggestions starting in more of a macro sense and then follow it up with some specific suggestions as to amending Reg SHO.
    [Show full text]
  • Legitimizing Pay to Play: Marketizing Radio Content Through a Responsive Auction Mechanism
    LEGITIMIZING PAY TO PLAY: MARKETIZING RADIO CONTENT THROUGH A RESPONSIVE AUCTION MECHANISM Alon Rotem* I. INTRODUCTION ............................................. 130 II. RADIO REGULATION BACKGROUND / HISTORY ........ 131 A. Government Enforced Public Interest Standards...... 131 B. Marketization of the Public Interest Doctrine ........ 133 C. The Impact of the 1996 Telecommunications Act on License Renewals .................................... 134 III. PAYOLA RULES ............................................ 135 A. Payola Rules Impact on the Recording Industry ...... 136 B. A Brief History of Payola Transgressions ............ 137 C. Falloutfrom Recent Payola Prosecution .............. 139 D. Modern Payola Rules Ambiguity ..................... 139 IV. IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGY AND AUCTIONS ON BROAD- CAST SCARCITY ............................................ 140 A. The Rise and Evolution of Technology-Driven A uctions ....... ..................................... 141 B. Applying the Auction Mechanism to Radio Content Programm ing ........................................ 141 * J.D. Candidate 2007, University of California, Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law. B.S. Managerial Economics, 2001, University of California, Davis. I would like to thank my wife, Nicole, parents, Doron and Batsheva, and brothers, Tommy and Jonathan for their love, support, and encouragement. Additionally, I would like to thank Professor Howard Shelanski for his wisdom and guidance in the "Telecommunications Law & Policy" class for which this comment was written. Special thanks to Paul Cohune, who has generously de- voted his time to editing this and virtually every paper I have written in the last 10 years, to Zach Katz for sharing his profound knowledge of the music industry, and to my future col- leagues at Ropes & Gray, LLP. I am also very grateful for the assistance of the editors of the UCLA Entertainment Law Review. Mr. Rotem welcomes comments at alon.rotem@ gmail.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Francine Mckenna, Adjunct Professor American University Kogod School of Business
    American Accounting Association 25th Annual Ethics Research Symposium 3:40 pm – 4:30 pm 10.1 The Future of the Accounting Profession: Regaining the Public Trust Moderator: William F. Miller, University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire Panelists: • Francine McKenna, American University • Steven Mintz, California Polytechnic State Univ. San Luis Obispo • Rick Kravitz, Editor in Chief: The CPA Journal, Texas A&M School of Law Francine McKenna, Adjunct Professor American University Kogod School of Business Auditors as Whistleblowers 1 AUDITORS AS WHISTLEBLOWERS We all know corporate accountants and other finance and operations professionals can be Dodd-Frank whistleblowers to the SEC. So can independent analysts. I call it the “Harry Markopolos provision.” State Street forex settlement is notch in belt for Madoff whistleblower “Markopolos spent years on Bernie Madoff’s trail and tried to warn regulators about the fraud, but he was largely ignored. It’s a frustrating experience he documented in his book, No One Would Listen: A True Financial Thriller.” Whistleblower award for NYSE fine goes to HFT critic “This is the first whistleblower award by the SEC under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 to reward an independent third party for analysis of a potential securities law violation, a model prompted by the experience of an unsuccessful outsider, Madoff whistleblower Harry Markopolos.” 2 AUDITORS AS WHISTLEBLOWERS: CAN INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL AUDITORS BE DODD-FRANK WHISTLEBLOWERS? Anthony Menendez: Former EY auditor, Brett Whitaker, former EY Senior Tax Manager and Director of Tax at Mattel CPA, CFE and former Halliburton Director of Technical Accounting • Whitaker blew the whistle to The Wall Street Journal on an accounting error that led Mattel to understate Research and Training its loss in the prior third quarter.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554
    Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 December 13, 2007 DA 07-4925 In Reply Refer to: 1800B3-RDH Released: December 14, 2007 Mr. Mark N. Lipp, Esq. Wiley Rein LLP 1776 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 In re: Multicultural Radio Broadcasting Licensee, LLC Station KAZN(AM), Pasadena, California Facility ID No. 51426 File No. BR-20050801CWN Multicultural Radio Broadcasting Licensee, LLC Station KAHZ(AM), Pomona, California Facility ID No. 61814 File No. BR-20050801CVN Polyethnic Broadcasting Licensee, LLC1 Station KMRB(AM), San Gabriel, California Facility ID No. 52913 File No. BR-20050801DCK Informal Objections to Applications for License Renewal Dear Mr. Lipp: This letter concerns the above-noted applications (collectively, the “Applications”) filed by Multicultural Radio Broadcasting Licensee, LLC to renew its licenses for Stations KAZN(AM), Pasadena, California and KAHZ(AM), Pomona, California, and by Polyethnic Broadcasting Licensee, LLC to renew its license for Station KMRB(AM), San Gabriel, California (collectively, the “Stations”). Also before us are three separate Informal Objections filed on October 31, 2005, by Liu-Chun Lin 1 Polyethnic Broadcasting Licensee, LLC, was the Licensee of Station KMRB(AM) at the time of the filing of the instant application for renewal of station license. On November 27, 2006, an Application for Consent to Assign Broadcast Station Construction Permit or License (BAL-20061114ADK) was granted by the Commission. Pursuant to this application, the License for Station KMRB(AM) was voluntarily assigned from Polyethnic Broadcasting Licensee, LLC, to Multicultural Radio Broadcasting Licensee, LLC. Both entities are controlled by the same individual and the assignment was sought as part of the merger of these two entities.
    [Show full text]
  • AUDITING DUE DILIGENCE in LAW and ETHICS: the PONZI “FEEDER FUND” CASES Albert D
    REVIEW OF BUSINESS & FINANCE CASE STUDIES ♦ Volume 3 ♦ Number 1 ♦ 2012 AUDITING DUE DILIGENCE IN LAW AND ETHICS: THE PONZI “FEEDER FUND” CASES Albert D. Spalding, Jr., Wayne State University ABSTRACT Financial accounting is an information conveyance process. When financial auditors issue an opinion in regard to financial statements, the auditors are providing assurance that those financial statements fairly represent the entity, and are prepared in accordance with the relevant standards. If there is a problem with the financial statements for which an unqualified audit opinion has been issued, the auditors may be questioned in regard to their compliance with professional technical and ethical standards that require competency, honesty, and full disclosure. These questions may be asked by the auditors’ professional organizations, such as the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), by government regulators who authorize the performance of auditing services, and by the judges and juries of the judicial system. This paper considers how the judiciary, in particular, takes into account auditors’ technical and ethical standards when auditors are sued for professional negligence and negligent misrepresentation. This investigation is done within the context of the recent lawsuits against auditors of “feeder funds” that invested with Ponzi scam artists such as Bernard Madoff. This paper concludes that the auditing profession has a “teachable moment” in the wake of the feeder fund failures, and should not overlook this opportunity to upgrade its ethical standards. JEL: K23; M42; M48 KEYWORDS: Auditing, financial disclosure, due diligence, negligent misrepresentation, accountants’ liability, professional ethics, Ponzi, feeder funds. INTRODUCTION inancial auditing is a professional discipline that requires both the technical skills and ethics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Law and Aeconomics of Mutual Fund Investment-Adviser Fiduciaries: Jones V
    Nova Law Review Volume 35, Issue 2 2011 Article 5 The Law and aEconomics of Mutual Fund Investment-Adviser Fiduciaries: Jones v. Harris Associates L.P. George Steven Swan∗ ∗ Copyright c 2011 by the authors. Nova Law Review is produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress). https://nsuworks.nova.edu/nlr Swan: The Law and aEconomics of Mutual Fund Investment-Adviser Fiduciar THE LAW AND ECONOMICS OF MUTUAL FUND INVESTMENT-ADVISER FIDUCIARIES: JONES v. HARRIS ASSOCIATES L.P. GEORGE STEVEN SWAN, S.J.D.* I. INTRO DUCTIO N ................................................................................... 394 II. GARTENBERG v. MERRILL LYNCH ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. .............. 396 III. INTERLUDE: EASTERBROOK AND FISCHEL ON FIDUCIARY DUTY ...... 401 IV. JONES v. HARRIS ASSOCIATES L.P........................................................ 405 V. THE GHOST OF JONES W ALKS ............................................................ 412 A. The Law and Economics of Executive Compensation............... 412 1. The Shareholders Snooze ................................................. 413 2. The D irectors D oze .......................................................... 416 3. The Ideal of Fiduciary Duty ............................................. 419 B. The Law and Economics of the HarrisAssociates Fees ........... 422 1. The Competition Conundrum .......................................... 423 2. Price D iscrimination ........................................................ 426 3. Inform ational Disclosure ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PB DATE Dec BO
    DOCUMENT RESUME A 'ED 203 274 CG 015 276 Homeless Youth: The Saga of "Pushouts" and . "Throwaways" in America. Report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-Sixth Congress, Second Session; INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C. Senate Committee on the Judiciary. PB DATE Dec BO . NOTE 2520: Not available in paper ;copy dui to small 4/41ILAHLE FROM Superintendent.of Documents,'M.S. Government Printing Offitei Washington, DC '20402. EDRS PRICE MFOtlilus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS: *Adolescents: *Child. AbuSe:',,,Chi.lid,Neglect: Family Orobiems:.HelpinT:RelatiOnship:', Juvenile Courts; *Parent Child RelatiOnthip: PrOblem.Zolving: *RuhawayWViolencei *youth Rrograms juisTgApT This report of the-,SenateSubcommittee,on the Comstitution examines the' )henOmenon OehOieljets yoUthoinCluding the population, fheirfamiliese. survival tactics, the availabiLityof services, and futureoutlOokSA SectiOnretriewingths:legal constraints imposed on young people Aidhaffect their, ability to 1iVe: on their own.,it folloWecf,b/ a review of the agenclesserving: 11,0MelesSyouth With dita,:aimpressionSdoliected:from;0 Interviews.. A:desdpiptiOnof runaway litogratsthroughoUt.the:United Stites. ncluded. Data frOm ou.6'sits pto.greOnyiSitsanUinterviei0 with. agency personnel,,policeofficets,:and InvenileAUstiCe, 'corrections, public assistanCes, mental health4 and childcare personnel, are reported. 4:41 .are .'also included frbm case reOardSof runaways and interviews )Conducted.with-homeless youth about. the quality of their liveti StirViValHtethrigues,'difficult,ies'endOuntered in obtaining,foodo shelterand:'emPloyment and their. hopes for*Oefuture.HS'lle appendices contain the Juvenile Justice and.:Runtway yoUth acts and amendments, additiOnalreports on hoieless youth and child-abuse, and interview ,torms for agency'Tersonnel and.youthS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Economy, Economic Crisis, and White-Collar Crime
    Contents Volume 9 • Issue 3 • August 2010 SPECIAL ISSUE The Global Economy, Economic Crisis, and White-Collar Crime EDITORIAL INTRODUCTION White-collar crime and the Great Recession .......................................................................429 Neal Shover, Peter Grabosky WALLS OF SECRECY AND SILENCE RESEARCH ARTICLE. Walls of secrecy and silence: The Madoff case ..........................................435 and cartels in the construction industry Henk van de Bunt POLICY ESSAY. Secrecy, silence, and corporate crime reforms ..................................................455 William S. Laufer POLICY ESSAY. Silent or invisible? Governments and corporate financial crimes .....................467 John Minkes POLICY ESSAY. How to effectively get crooks like Bernie Madoff in Dutch .............................475 Henry N. Pontell, Gilbert Geis POLICY ESSAY. Getting our attention .......................................................................................483 Nancy Reichman SERIOUS TAX FRAUD AND NONCOMPLIANCE RESEARCH ARTICLE. Serious tax fraud and noncompliance: A review of evidence ....................493 on the differential impact of criminal and noncriminal proceedings Michael Levi POLICY ESSAY. Criminal prosecution within responsive regulatory practice ............................515 Valerie Braithwaite POLICY ESSAY. Fairness matters—more than deterrence: .........................................................525 Class bias and the limits of deterrence Paul Leighton POLICY ESSAY. Serious tax noncompliance: Motivation
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S4590
    S4590 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE April 17, 2007 Montana State Legislature. Both the independent music community on forceable standards. I have no reason houses of the legislature approved this airplay and rules of engagement. I to believe that the potential good from legislation unanimously. Thirteen want to especially commend Commis- these agreements will not be fulfilled, other States have anti-REAL ID legis- sioner Adelstein for his tireless work but we can’t allow backsliding, espe- lation that has passed one of the to bring these groups together and cially after the 3-year term of the de- houses of the legislature. In Montana then-Attorney General Spitzer for crees expires. This means that the FCC and the rest of these States, opposition spearheading the initial investigation will need to maintain vigorous and to this poorly constructed law is bipar- that has led to State and now Federal continued oversight. I urge the FCC to tisan. settlements. take the next step of building on this That is why I am pleased to once I was encouraged to see internal busi- first wave of settlements and reaching again offer my support for the Identi- ness reforms, increased recordkeeping agreements or taking enforcement ac- fication Security Enhancement Act, in- for transactions between labels and tion against the other stations impli- troduced by Senator AKAKA and Sen- radio stations and unfettered access to cated by the Spitzer investigation. ator SUNUNU—another bipartisan show these records by the FCC as part of the f consent decrees. While these provisions of opposition to the REAL ID Act.
    [Show full text]
  • INTOXICATED WRONGDOERS AFTER MONTANA V. EGELHOFF
    IMPLICIT REDEFINITIONS, EVIDENTIARY PROSCRIPTIONS, AND GUILTY MINDS: INTOXICATED WRONGDOERS AFTER MONTANA v. EGELHOFF BRETT G. SWEITZERt You heard all about drugs. Sin ain't sin when good folks take a little pill, smoke a little marijuana. "I really didn't intend to kill that police offi- cer." I don't buy that and I don't believe you do. A man doesn't take pills and take dope and drink whiskey and not be accountable for what he does. That'sjust an excuse. -From the prosecutor's argument to the jury in Mississippi v. Lanier INTRODUCTION In July 1992, James Egelhoff was in northwestern Montana camp- ing and picking mushrooms. 2 He carried no personal items save the clothes he was wearing and a .38-caliber handgun. While camping, he met two other mushroom harvesters, Roberta Payola and John Christianson. OnJuly 12, Egelhoff, Payola, and Christianson sold the mushrooms they had collected, bought some beer, and spent the day drinking at bars and a private party. Sometime after 9:00 P.M., the trio left the party and continued drinking while driving around in Christianson's car. t B.A. 1993, Colgate University; J.D. Candidate 1998, University of Pennsylvania. Acknowledgments of helpful comments and overlooked errors are customary. As to the first, I thank my wife, Lisa Mathewson, for her many insightful comments, and the editors of the Law Review for their tireless efforts in putting this Comment in order. As to the second, I adopt the poet's modesty: I washed thy face, but more defects I saw, And rubbing off a spot still made a flaw.
    [Show full text]
  • Drawing the Line: a Guide to Avoiding Illegal Content for the On-Air
    COMMUNICATIONS / BROADCAST Special Advisory to Broadcasters September 2001 Drawing the Line: A Guide to Avoiding Illegal Content for the On-Air Familiarity with Commission rules regarding on-air content should be part of an effective "bottom- Performer line" strategy. In most cases, editorial judgments made in advance, especially in the case of Introduction 1 syndicated or pre-recorded programming, can Obscenity 1 prevent illegal content from reaching the air. Indecency 2 Therefore, it is important for those involved with The Fairness Doctrine 4 the implementation of on-air programming to be Personal Attacks 4 up-to-date with the boundary lines that the FCC Political Editorializing 5 and the courts have drawn to distinguish legal from Libel and Invasion of Privacy 5 illegal on-air content. Libel 5 Commercial Disparagement 6 This guide is not meant to constitute legal advice or Invasion of Privacy 6 to represent an exhaustive survey of permissible Rebroadcasting Telephone and impermissible on-air activity. Rather, it is Conversations 6 intended to provide general information to the Rebroadcasting Emergency on-air performer regarding FCC rules and policies Communications 7 in 15 areas that directly affect on-air speech. Often, Airing "Bartnicki" Material 8 a violation in one of these areas can result in fines, TV News Crew "Ride-Alongs" 8 broadcast license renewal difficulties, or challenges Payola/Plugola 9 under civil and criminal laws. If a planned on-air Illegal Lotteries and Contests 10 activity raises questions of potential liability for the Illegal Lotteries 10 station, do not hesitate to contact us, since legal Illegal Contests and advice should always be obtained for specific facts Promotions 11 and circumstances as the need arises.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court Southern District of New York
    Case 1:12-mc-00115-JSR Document 355 Filed 09/24/12 Page 1 of 52 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Adv. Pro. No. 08-01789 (BRL) Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 12-mc-0115 (JSR) BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, Defendant. In re: MADOFF SECURITIES TRUSTEE’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANTS’ SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS REGARDING THE STANDARD FOR THE “GOOD FAITH” AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, New York 10111 Telephone: (212) 589-4200 Facsimile: (212) 589-4201 Attorneys for Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Substantively Consolidated SIPA Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC and Estate of Bernard L. Madoff Case 1:12-mc-00115-JSR Document 355 Filed 09/24/12 Page 2 of 52 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ................................................................................................... 2 PROCEDURAL HISTORY........................................................................................................... 5 ARGUMENT ................................................................................................................................. 6 I. THE TRUSTEE HAS MET HIS PLEADING BURDEN WITH RESPECT TO INITIAL AND SUBSEQUENT TRANSFEREES ....................... 6 A. The Trustee Has Pleaded the Elements of His Claims Under 11 U.S.C. §§ 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a) ............................................................ 6 B. The Trustee Need Not Allege the Defendants’
    [Show full text]