DOCSLIB.ORG

Threatened Species & Ecological Communities Regional Strategic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Threatened Species & Ecological Communities Regional Strategic Threatened Species & Ecological Communities Regional Strategic Management Plan South Coast Region, Western Australia June 2009 Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation for Australian Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts and South Coast Natural Resource Management Inc. This South Coast Threatened Species and Ecological Communities Strategic Management Plan has been prepared by Sandra Gilfillan, Polly Mitchell, Janet Newell, Alan Danks and Sarah Comer, of the Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation, South Coast Region. For bibliographic purposes this document should be cited as: Gilfillan, S., Mitchell, P., Newell, J., Danks, A. & Comer, S. (2009). South Coast Threatened Species and Ecological Communities Strategic Management Plan, Department of Environment and Conservation, Albany. South Coast Threatened Species and Ecological Communities Strategic Management Plan Department of Environment and Conservation South Coast Region 120 Albany Highway Albany WA 6330 FOREWORD This Strategic Management Plan is the result of a pilot project in regional threatened species recovery planning, initiated in 2004 by the Australian Government Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (DEWHA). The aim of this project was to investigate the feasibility of an integrated regional approach to threatened species recovery and threat abatement planning. The development of this Plan was managed by the Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) in partnership with DEWHA and the South Coast Natural Resource Management Inc. (South Coast NRM). This Plan is intended to guide threatened species recovery and threat abatement in the South Coast Region. It is intended to complement and not duplicate regional NRM planning and current threatened species Recovery Plans. This Plan has tested the feasibility of preparing a regional Recovery Plan under the guidelines for a Recovery Plan under the Commonwealths Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). The structure of this regional Plan meets most but not all of the requirements for a Recovery Plan under the EPBC Act. This Strategic Management Plan will operate from 2009, following endorsement by DEC and DEWHA. It will remain in force until such time as it is withdrawn or replaced. A review of the plan will be completed after 5 years. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Development of this Regional Strategic Management Plan began in 2004 with a project team of: Alan Danks Regional Leader Nature Conservation, DEC, South Coast Region Sarah Comer Regional Ecologist, DEC, South Coast Region Sandra Gilfillan Recovery Planner, DEC, South Coast Region As well as the project team the development of this Plan was guided by the Steering Committee: John Watson Regional Manager, DEC, South Coast Region Bruce McLaren DEWHA (formally AGDEH) John Blyth A/Manager WATSCU, DEC Liz Thorburn NHT WA Rob Edkins Chief Executive Officer, South Coast NRM (formally SCRIPT) Nathan McQuoid Biodiversity Officer, South Coast NRM (formally SCRIPT) Neil Blake South Coast NRM (formally SCRIPT) Neil Riches State NRM Biodiversity Facilitator, Australian Government This Plan has been written by Sandra Gilfillan, Polly Mitchell and Janet Newell (Recovery Planners, South Coast Region, DEC), under the guidance of Alan Danks and Sarah Comer. Thanks to many others involved in the development and provision of information for this Plan including Recovery Teams, Anne Cochrane (DEC Science Division) and Sarah Barrett (DEC South Coast Region). The majority of the funding support for the development of this Plan was provided by the Australian Government, with additional funding and in-kind support from DEC and South Coast NRM. TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY .....................................................................................................................................i 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................1 1.1 South Coast Region ..................................................................................................1 1.2 Rationale for this Regional Plan...............................................................................3 1.2.1 Trialing of a Regional Approach..............................................................................3 1.3 Scope of this Plan .....................................................................................................4 1.4 Objectives .................................................................................................................5 1.5 Regional Plan Evaluation .........................................................................................5 1.6 Relationship to Existing Regional Recovery and Threat Abatement Documents....5 1.7 Document Structure..................................................................................................6 1.8 Assessment of the Regional Approach.....................................................................6 2 LEGISLATIVE PROTECTION OF THREATENED SPECIES AND ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES...........................................................................................................................11 2.1 Legislative Protection.............................................................................................11 2.1.1 Commonwealth.......................................................................................................11 2.1.2 State ........................................................................................................................11 2.1.3 International Conventions and Agreements ...........................................................12 2.2 Listing of Threatened Species ................................................................................12 2.2.1 Commonwealth.......................................................................................................12 2.2.2 State ........................................................................................................................13 2.2.3 Alignment of State and Commonwealth Listed Species ........................................14 2.3 Non-legislative priority lists ...................................................................................14 2.4 Recovery Planning and Implementation.................................................................14 2.4.1 Recovery Plans .......................................................................................................15 2.4.2 Threatened Flora Management Programs...............................................................15 2.4.3 Recovery Teams .....................................................................................................15 2.4.4 Funding...................................................................................................................16 2.5 Land Tenure............................................................................................................16 2.5.1 Protected Areas.......................................................................................................17 2.5.2 Unallocated Crown Land........................................................................................17 2.5.3 Other Land Tenure..................................................................................................17 3 THREATENED SPECIES AND COMMUNITIES OCCURRING IN THE REGION. .....19 3.1 Threatened Species and Communities in the Region .............................................19 3.1.1 Threatened Fauna ...................................................................................................19 3.1.2 Threatened Flora.....................................................................................................20 3.1.3 Threatened Ecological Communities......................................................................25 3.2 Priority Species and Communities in the Region...................................................25 3.2.1 Priority Fauna .........................................................................................................25 3.2.2 Priority Flora...........................................................................................................26 3.2.3 Priority Ecological Communities ...........................................................................26 3.3 Distribution of Threatened Species Across the Region..........................................26 3.3.1 Threatened fauna records........................................................................................26 3.3.2 Threatened Flora Records.......................................................................................27 3.3.3 Threatened Ecological Community Records..........................................................28 3.3.4 All Threatened Species Records.............................................................................29 3.3.5 Limitation to use of Point Records.........................................................................29 4 THREATENING PROCESSES IN THE REGION ............................................................. 33 4.1 Primary Threatening Processes .............................................................................. 33 4.1.1 Inappropriate Fire Regimes.................................................................................... 33 4.1.2 Phytophthora Cinnamomi Infestation ...................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thymelaeaceae)
    Origin and diversification of the Australasian genera Pimelea and Thecanthes (Thymelaeaceae) by MOLEBOHENG CYNTHIA MOTS! Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree PHILOSOPHIAE DOCTOR in BOTANY in the FACULTY OF SCIENCE at the UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG Supervisor: Dr Michelle van der Bank Co-supervisors: Dr Barbara L. Rye Dr Vincent Savolainen JUNE 2009 AFFIDAVIT: MASTER'S AND DOCTORAL STUDENTS TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN This serves to confirm that I Moleboheng_Cynthia Motsi Full Name(s) and Surname ID Number 7808020422084 Student number 920108362 enrolled for the Qualification PhD Faculty _Science Herewith declare that my academic work is in line with the Plagiarism Policy of the University of Johannesburg which I am familiar. I further declare that the work presented in the thesis (minor dissertation/dissertation/thesis) is authentic and original unless clearly indicated otherwise and in such instances full reference to the source is acknowledged and I do not pretend to receive any credit for such acknowledged quotations, and that there is no copyright infringement in my work. I declare that no unethical research practices were used or material gained through dishonesty. I understand that plagiarism is a serious offence and that should I contravene the Plagiarism Policy notwithstanding signing this affidavit, I may be found guilty of a serious criminal offence (perjury) that would amongst other consequences compel the UJ to inform all other tertiary institutions of the offence and to issue a corresponding certificate of reprehensible academic conduct to whomever request such a certificate from the institution. Signed at _Johannesburg on this 31 of _July 2009 Signature Print name Moleboheng_Cynthia Motsi STAMP COMMISSIONER OF OATHS Affidavit certified by a Commissioner of Oaths This affidavit cordons with the requirements of the JUSTICES OF THE PEACE AND COMMISSIONERS OF OATHS ACT 16 OF 1963 and the applicable Regulations published in the GG GNR 1258 of 21 July 1972; GN 903 of 10 July 1998; GN 109 of 2 February 2001 as amended.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Flora and Vegetation Assessment Carrabungup Road, Nirimba Project No: EP20-102(01)
    Detailed Flora and Vegetation Assessment Carrabungup Road, Nirimba Project No: EP20-102(01) Prepared for Shire of Murray February 2021 Prepared for Shire of Murray Doc No.: EP20-102(05)--006 RAW| Version: 001 Detailed Flora and Vegetation Assessment Carrabungup Road, Nirimba Document Control Doc name: Detailed Flora and Vegetation Assessment Carrabungup Road, Nirimba Doc no.: EP20-102(05)--006 RAW Version Date Author Reviewer February 2021 Tom Atkinson TAA Rachel Weber RAW 1 Report prepared for client review © 2021 Emerge Associates All Rights Reserved. Copyright in the whole and every part of this document belongs to Emerge Associates and may not be used, sold, transferred, copied or reproduced in whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on any media to any person without the prior written consent of Emerge Associates. Project number: EP20-102(01)|February 2021 Page i Prepared for Shire of Murray Doc No.: EP20-102(05)--006 RAW| Version: 001 Detailed Flora and Vegetation Assessment Carrabungup Road, Nirimba Executive Summary The Shire of Murray engaged Emerge Associates (Emerge) to undertake a detailed flora and vegetation survey along section of Carrabungup Road in Nirimba (referred to herein as the ‘site’). Emerge were engaged to conduct a detailed assessment to provide information on the flora and vegetation values to inform a clearing permit application. As part of the assessment a desktop review of relevant background information was completed and a field survey was undertaken in September and December 2020. During the field survey an assessment was made on the type, condition and values of vegetation across the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Isopogons & Petrophiles
    ISOPOGONS & PETROPHILES The Association of Societies for Growing Australian Plants Isopogon & Petrophile Study Group Newsletter ISSN 1445-9493 Number 8 May 2006 Petrophile serruriae. Dryandra woodland, WA, September 2005. (See page 8 for more details about this species) CONTENTS 2 EDITORIAL 3 MEMBERS’ LETTERS & EMAILS 8 PETROPHILE SERRURIAE R.BR. 10 GLOSSARY, REFERENCES E DITORIAL Welcome to edition 8 of the Isopogon and I managed to get to the APS Geelong plant Petrophile study group newsletter. You’ll find sale about a month ago, which was fantastic. that this issue is a little thinner than previous As usual there were a large number of ones, as I have not had a great deal of growers from all over Victoria and interstate material sent to me. If anyone is sitting on with a huge variety of plants for sale. There an article for the newsletter, please send it in. were a few Isopogons, but not many Petrophiles All will be gratefully accepted and who available, but I did manage to pick up knows, you may (will more likely) find Isopogon baxteri and one labelled as Isopogon yourself immortalised in print. Thanks to all uncinatus, two species I have not previously those who have sent me letters and emails. seen for sale, and one’s I have admired and They all contain valuable information to looked for. They are planted out and I’ll let help our understanding of Isopogons and you know how they go. Isopogon uncinatus is Petrophiles. the rarest Isopogon and was thought to be I can’t believe its May already, the year is extinct until it was rediscovered in the 1980’s flying past.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Orchid Society South Australia
    Journal of the Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc Thelymitra Print Post Approved .Volume 32 Nº 10 PP 543662/00018 November 2008 NATIVE ORCHID SOCIETY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA PO BOX 565 UNLEY SA 5061 www.nossa.org.au. The Native Orchid Society of South Australia promotes the conservation of orchids through the preservation of natural habitat and through cultivation. Except with the documented official representation of the management committee, no person may represent the Society on any matter. All native orchids are protected in the wild; their collection without written Government permit is illegal. PRESIDENT SECRETARY Bill Dear: Cathy Houston Telephone 8296 2111 mob. 0413 659 506 telephone 8356 7356 Email: [email protected] VICE PRESIDENT Bodo Jensen COMMITTEE Bob Bates Thelma Bridle John Bartram John Peace EDITOR TREASURER David Hirst Marj Sheppard 14 Beaverdale Avenue Telephone 8344 2124 Windsor Gardens SA 5087 0419 189 188 Telephone 8261 7998 Email: [email protected] LIFE MEMBERS Mr R. Hargreaves† Mr. L. Nesbitt Mr H. Goldsack† Mr G. Carne Mr R. Robjohns† Mr R Bates Mr J. Simmons† Mr R Shooter Mr D. Wells† Mr W Dear Conservation Officer: Thelma Bridle Registrar of Judges: Les Nesbitt Field Trips Coordinator: Bob Bates 83429247 or 0402 291 904 or [email protected] Trading Table: Judy Penney Tuber bank Coordinator: Jane Higgs ph. 8558 6247; email: [email protected] New Members Coordinator: John Bartram ph: 8331 3541; email: [email protected] PATRON Mr L. Nesbitt The Native Orchid Society of South Australia, while taking all due care, take no responsibility for loss or damage to any plants whether at shows, meetings or exhibits.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloading Or Purchasing Online At
    On-farm Evaluation of Grafted Wildflowers for Commercial Cut Flower Production OCTOBER 2012 RIRDC Publication No. 11/149 On-farm Evaluation of Grafted Wildflowers for Commercial Cut Flower Production by Jonathan Lidbetter October 2012 RIRDC Publication No. 11/149 RIRDC Project No. PRJ-000509 © 2012 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-74254-328-4 ISSN 1440-6845 On-farm Evaluation of Grafted Wildflowers for Commercial Cut Flower Production Publication No. 11/149 Project No. PRJ-000509 The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication. The Commonwealth of Australia, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, RIRDC, the authors or contributors. The Commonwealth of Australia does not necessarily endorse the views in this publication. This publication is copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project
    Submission to Senate Inquiry: Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project: Potential Impacts on Matters of National Environmental Significance within Modelled Oil Spill Impact Areas (Summer and Winter 2A Model Scenarios) Prepared by Dr David Ellis (BSc Hons PhD; Ecologist, Environmental Consultant and Founder at Stepping Stones Ecological Services) March 27, 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 4 Summer Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................. 5 Winter Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................... 7 Threatened Species Conservation Status Summary ........................................... 8 International Migratory Bird Agreements ............................................................. 8 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 11 Methods .................................................................................................................... 12 Protected Matters Search Tool Database Search and Criteria for Oil-Spill Model Selection ............................................................................................................. 12 Criteria for Inclusion/Exclusion of Threatened, Migratory and Marine
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?
    Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica BACKHOUSE, GARY N. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 28- 43 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 28-43. 2007. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA GARY N. BACKHOUSE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia [email protected] KEY WORDS:threatened orchids Australia conservation status Introduction Many orchid species are included in this list. This paper examines the listing process for threatened Australia has about 1700 species of orchids, com- orchids in Australia, compares regional and national prising about 1300 named species in about 190 gen- lists of threatened orchids, and provides recommen- era, plus at least 400 undescribed species (Jones dations for improving the process of listing regionally 2006, pers. comm.). About 1400 species (82%) are and nationally threatened orchids. geophytes, almost all deciduous, seasonal species, while 300 species (18%) are evergreen epiphytes Methods and/or lithophytes. At least 95% of this orchid flora is endemic to Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Isopogon Uncinatus)
    Interim Recovery Plan No. 345 Albany Cone Bush (Isopogon uncinatus) Interim Recovery Plan 2014–2019 Department of Parks and Wildlife, Western Australia June 2014 Interim Recovery Plan for Isopogon uncinatus List of Acronyms The following acronyms are used in this plan: ADTFRT Albany District Threatened Flora Recovery Team BGPA Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority CALM Department of Conservation and Land Management CCWA Conservation Commission of Western Australia CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species CR Critically Endangered DEC Department of Environment and Conservation DAA Department of Aboriginal Affairs DPaW Department of Parks and Wildlife (also shown as Parks and Wildlife and the department) DRF Declared Rare Flora EN Endangered EPBC Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation IBRA Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia IRP Interim Recovery Plan IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature LGA Local Government Authority MRWA Main Roads Western Australia NRM Natural Resource Management PEC Priority Ecological Community RDL Department of Regional Development and Lands RP Recovery Plan SCB Species and Communities Branch SCD Science and Conservation Division SWALSC South West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council TEC Threatened Ecological Community TFSC Threatened Flora Seed Centre UNEP-WCMC United Nations Environment Program World Conservation Monitoring Centre VU Vulnerable WA Western Australia 2 Interim Recovery Plan for Isopogon uncinatus Foreword Interim Recovery Plans (IRPs) are developed within the framework laid down in Department of Parks and Wildlife Policy Statements Nos. 44 and 50 (CALM 1992; CALM 1994). Note: The Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM) formally became the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) in July 2006 and the Department of Parks and Wildlife in July 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • RECOVERY TEAM Annual Report
    RECOVERY TEAM Annual report THREATENED SPECIES AND/OR COMMUNITIES RECOVERY TEAM PROGRAM INFORMATION Recovery Team Albany Threatened Flora Reporting Period DATE FROM: 1/1/14 DATE TO: 31/12/14 Submission date 31 March Current membership Member Representing Sarah Comer DPAW Chair Sarah Barrett DPAW Exec Officer Members Linda Strahan Albany Wildflower Society Libby Sandiford Albany Wildflower Society John Tucker Community member Margaret Pieroni Community member Merle Bennett Ravensthorpe Wildflower Society Andrew Brown DPAW Dave Coates DPAW Anne Cochrane DPAW Rebecca Dillon DPAW Steve Hopper UWA 9/5/13 &12/11/13 Dates meetings were held Highlights of achievements for the 21 new populations or sub-populations of 11 Threatened flora previous 12 months suitable for were located. Of significance were new populations of Daviesia publication in WATSNU and pseudaphylla (CR), new sub-populations of Banksia brownii contribution to DEC annual report. (CR), Lambertia fairallii (CR) and Boronia clavata; and new Provide 1-2 paragraphs summarising populations of Gastrolobium humile (x4), Eucalyptus nutans total number of new populations and Eremophila denticulata ssp denticulata. located, surveys completed, list major management actions etc 43 new populations of priority flora were located including significant new populations of Allocasuarina sp Boxwood Hill (P1). and two species removed from the Priority flora list due to survey. 5000m2 of fencing (8 x 25x25m enclosures) was completed on Bluff Knoll within the Montane Heath & Thicket TEC . This will be critical for the protection and reproductive success of Critically Endangered Darwinia collina, Leucopogon gnaphalioides, Latrobea colophona and Andersonia axilliflora. The benefits of fencing were already evident by Dec 2014 and has enabled heavily grazed plants of species such as L.
    [Show full text]
  • Banksia Montana Mealybug)
    Short form Threatened species nomination form (Version Mar 2016) Abridged Threatened Species Nomination Form For nominations under the Common Assessment Method (CAM) where supporting information is available, but not in a format suitable for demonstrating compliance with the CAM, and assessment against the IUCN Red List threat status. Cover Page (Office use only) Species name (scientific and common name): Pseudococcus markharveyi (Banksia montana mealybug) Nomination for (addition, deletion, change): Addition Nominated conservation category and criteria: Critically Endangered: B1+2ab(iii) Scientific committee assessment of eligibility against the criteria: This assessment is consistent with the standards set out in Schedule 1, item 2.7 (h) and Yes No 2.8 of the Common Assessment Method Memorandum of Understanding. A. Population size reduction B. Geographic range C. Small population size and decline D. Very small or restricted population E. Quantitative analysis Outcome: Scientific committee meeting date: Scientific committee comments: Recommendation: Ministerial approval: Date of Gazettal/ Legislative effect: Page 1 of 10 Nomination summary (to be completed by nominator) Current conservation status Scientific name: Pseudococcus markharveyi Common name: Banksia montana mealybug Family name: Pseudococcidae Fauna Flora Nomination for: Listing Change of status Delisting 1. Is the species currently on any conservation list, either in a State or Territory, Australia or Internationally? Provide details of the occurrence and listing status for each jurisdiction in the following table 2. Is it present in an Australian jurisdiction, but not listed? State / Territory in Listing category i.e. Date listed or Listing criteria i.e. Jurisdiction which the species critically endangered assessed (or N/A) B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii) occurs or ‘none’ International (IUCN 12/03/2014 Critically Endangered B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v) Red List) National (EPBC Act) State / Territory 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Recovery Plan No. 370
    Interim Recovery Plan No. 370 Montane Heath and Thicket of the South West Botanical Province, above approximately 900 m above sea level (Eastern Stirling Range Montane Heath and Thicket Community) 2016-2021 October 2016 1 Foreword Interim Recovery Plans (IRPs) are developed within the framework laid down in Department of Parks and Wildlife Policy Statement No. 35 (DPaW 2015a) and Department of Parks and Wildlife Corporate Guideline No. 35 (DPaW 2015b). This Interim Recovery Plan replaces plan number 52 ‘Montane Heath and Thicket of the South West Botanical Province, above approximately 900 m above sea level (Eastern Stirling Range Montane Heath and Thicket Community) 1999-2001’ by S. Barrett. IRPs outline the recovery actions that are required to urgently address the threatening processes most affecting the ongoing survival of threatened taxa or ecological communities, and begin the recovery process. The department is committed to ensuring that threatened ecological communities are conserved through the preparation and implementation of Recovery Plans or Interim Recovery Plans and by ensuring that conservation action commences as soon as possible and always within one year of endorsement of that rank by the department’s Director of Science and Conservation. This IRP will operate from 4 December 2016 but will remain in force until withdrawn or replaced. It is intended that, if the ecological community is still listed as Threatened after five years, this Interim Recovery Plan will be replaced or updated. This IRP was approved by the Director of Science and Conservation on 4 December 2016. The provision of funds identified in this IRP is dependent on budgetary and other constraints affecting the department, as well as the need to address other priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Australian Wildlife Management Program No
    WESTERN AUSTRALIAN WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM NO. 33 Declared Rare and Poorly Known Flora in the Central Forest Region by Kim Williams Andrew Horan Scott Wood Andrew Webb 2001 Department of Conservation and Land Management Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre WA 6983 1 Department of Conservation and Land Management Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre WA 6983 This study was partly funded by the Endangered Species Program of Environment Australia (ESP Project No. 440) Department of Conservation and Land Management Western Australia 2001 ISSN 0816-9713 Cover photograph: Grevillea maccutcheonii by Andrew Brown Editorial..................................................................................................... Kim Williams, Andrew Horan Editors and page preparation....................................................Kim Williams, Andrew Horan, Jill Pryde Maps....................................................................................................................................Kim Williams 2 FOREWORD Western Australian Wildlife Management Programs are a series of publications produced by the Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM). The programs are prepared in addition to Regional Management Plans to provide detailed information and guidance for the management and protection of certain exploited or threatened species (e.g. Kangaroos, Noisy Scrub-bird and the Rose Mallee). This program provides a brief description of the appearance, distribution, habitat and conservation status of flora declared as
    [Show full text]